MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2005.07.005

Медицинская библиотека · Accident; analysis and prevention · 2005

Hospitalisation for injuries among Finnish conscripts in 1990-1999.

Mattila Ville M, Parkkari Jari, Korpela Heikki, Pihlajamäki Harri

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe the incidence, trends and nature of hospitalisation for injuries among Finnish conscripts between 1990 and 1999.

STUDY DESIGN AND

SETTING

A hospital discharge register study on the hospitalisation for injuries with a follow-up of 213509-person-years.

RESULTS

During the 10-year study period, altogether 20016 hospitalisations for injuries were registered. Over this period, the annual incidence of hospitalisation for injuries declined with 26%, from 113.3 (95% CI: 108.7-118.0) per 1000 conscripts in 1990 to 84.1 (95% CI: 80.0-88.2) in 1999. Summer and autumn were the seasons with the highest incidence rates. Half of the injuries were sprains, strains, or fractures, and in half of the injuries, the anatomical location involved was the lower limb. The leading external causes of injuries were falls (31.8%) and injuries inflicted by foreign objects or machinery (18.5%).

CONCLUSION

Although hospitalisations for injuries declined between 1990 and 1999, injuries are still an important cause of morbidity in the Finnish Defence Forces. Further studies to evaluate the risk factors and mechanisms of injuries are needed to develop effective prevention strategies.

Для цитирования: Mattila Ville M, Parkkari Jari, Korpela Heikki, Pihlajamäki Harri. Hospitalisation for injuries among Finnish conscripts in 1990-1999.. Accident; analysis and prevention. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.07.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.