The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception · 2019
Effect of cost on early removal of contraceptive implants: a prospective cohort study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lozano Manuel, Obiol María Antonia, Peiró Juanjo, Ramada José María
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the cost of subdermal etonogestrel implant (SEI) on the continuation rate one year after insertion, and to assess the reasons given by users to remove the implant before the expiration date.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study conducted among 265 women who chose the SEI as a contraceptive method in a sexual and reproductive health center in the eastern region of Spain, between October/2012 and October/2017. The sample was divided into two cohorts depending on the cost of the implant for the user (free-of-charge or requiring partial payment). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the cumulative removal rates of free implants with partially paid implants within the first year of insertion. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for confounders.
RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, no significant associations were found between the cost of the implant and its removal within a year of insertion. No significant associations were found in the reasons given for implant removal and for the duration of implant use.
CONCLUSIONS: Cost was not associated with SEI continuation rates within the first year of use. No other significant variables were found to explain implant removal within one year of use.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study conducted among 265 women who chose the SEI as a contraceptive method in a sexual and reproductive health center in the eastern region of Spain, between October/2012 and October/2017. The sample was divided into two cohorts depending on the cost of the implant for the user (free-of-charge or requiring partial payment). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the cumulative removal rates of free implants with partially paid implants within the first year of insertion. Cox proportional hazards models were used to control for confounders.
RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, no significant associations were found between the cost of the implant and its removal within a year of insertion. No significant associations were found in the reasons given for implant removal and for the duration of implant use.
CONCLUSIONS: Cost was not associated with SEI continuation rates within the first year of use. No other significant variables were found to explain implant removal within one year of use.