American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2017
Randomized trial of high- and low-fidelity simulation to teach intrauterine contraception placement.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nippita Siripanth, Haviland Miriam J, Voit Sara F, Perez-Peralta Judith, Hacker Michele R, Paul Maureen E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: High-fidelity simulation creates conditions that resemble real circumstances, and can help teach procedures such as intrauterine contraception placement. Its impact on skill retention has not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate novice learners' skills, attitudes, and knowledge on placement of intrauterine contraception when trained using a high-fidelity commercially available simulator compared with a low-fidelity simulator.
STUDY DESIGN: We recruited senior nurse practitioner students and interns in obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine inexperienced with intrauterine contraception placement. In this unblinded, randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to practice within a high-fidelity simulator group or a coasterlike model group. We evaluated intrauterine contraception placement skills, self-perceived comfort and competence, and knowledge before and after simulation, as well as at 3 months. Our primary outcome was the change in scores for intrauterine contraception placement skills before and after practice. Assuming a standard deviation of 15 points, we needed 10 participants per group to detect a 20-point difference in scores with 80% power.
RESULTS: From June through July 2014, 60 participants enrolled; 59 completed the initial study visit and 1 withdrew. In all, 48 (80%) completed the second study visit at 3 months. Demographic characteristics were similar for the randomization groups. We observed an improvement in intrauterine contraception placement skills for both groups following practice on simulators (P < .01); the proportion that improved was similar (20% for the high-fidelity simulator group and 15% for the coaster group, P = .55). Increases in self-perceived comfort and competence with placing copper, levonorgestrel 52-mg, and levonorgestrel 13.5-mg devices were similar (all P ≥ .11). Knowledge assessment scores were comparable between the 2 groups postsimulation (73% for the high-fidelity simulator group and 80% for the coaster group, P = .29) and at 3 months (87% for both groups, P = 1.0).
CONCLUSION: Trainees' knowledge, intrauterine contraception placement skills, and self-perceived comfort and competence were comparable whether they used high- or low-fidelity simulators.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate novice learners' skills, attitudes, and knowledge on placement of intrauterine contraception when trained using a high-fidelity commercially available simulator compared with a low-fidelity simulator.
STUDY DESIGN: We recruited senior nurse practitioner students and interns in obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine inexperienced with intrauterine contraception placement. In this unblinded, randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to practice within a high-fidelity simulator group or a coasterlike model group. We evaluated intrauterine contraception placement skills, self-perceived comfort and competence, and knowledge before and after simulation, as well as at 3 months. Our primary outcome was the change in scores for intrauterine contraception placement skills before and after practice. Assuming a standard deviation of 15 points, we needed 10 participants per group to detect a 20-point difference in scores with 80% power.
RESULTS: From June through July 2014, 60 participants enrolled; 59 completed the initial study visit and 1 withdrew. In all, 48 (80%) completed the second study visit at 3 months. Demographic characteristics were similar for the randomization groups. We observed an improvement in intrauterine contraception placement skills for both groups following practice on simulators (P < .01); the proportion that improved was similar (20% for the high-fidelity simulator group and 15% for the coaster group, P = .55). Increases in self-perceived comfort and competence with placing copper, levonorgestrel 52-mg, and levonorgestrel 13.5-mg devices were similar (all P ≥ .11). Knowledge assessment scores were comparable between the 2 groups postsimulation (73% for the high-fidelity simulator group and 80% for the coaster group, P = .29) and at 3 months (87% for both groups, P = 1.0).
CONCLUSION: Trainees' knowledge, intrauterine contraception placement skills, and self-perceived comfort and competence were comparable whether they used high- or low-fidelity simulators.