The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception · 2002
Factors leading to the removal of the intrauterine implant Gynefix.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bonacho I, Gómez-Besteiro M I, Pita S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of expulsion of the Gynefix intrauterine implant, to analyze the variables associated with the above and to examine the efficacy of this intrauterine contraceptive model in users at the Municipal Family Planning Center-SERGAS in A Coruña, Spain.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed on all women (n = 358) who had a Gynefix implant inserted from March 1998 to September 2000.
RESULTS: The accumulated incidence of implant expulsion was 6.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-9.9) with a pregnancy rate of 0.6% (95% CI 0.09-2.2). The probability of implant removal decreases with the rise in the number of implants that have been inserted by the professional. A multivariate analysis adjusted for age, number of implants and uterine position showed that the position of the uterus was the variable that independently determined the probability of removal.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that retroflexion of the uterus increases the probability of removal.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed on all women (n = 358) who had a Gynefix implant inserted from March 1998 to September 2000.
RESULTS: The accumulated incidence of implant expulsion was 6.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-9.9) with a pregnancy rate of 0.6% (95% CI 0.09-2.2). The probability of implant removal decreases with the rise in the number of implants that have been inserted by the professional. A multivariate analysis adjusted for age, number of implants and uterine position showed that the position of the uterus was the variable that independently determined the probability of removal.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that retroflexion of the uterus increases the probability of removal.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultConfidence IntervalsContraceptionDevice RemovalFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine Device ExpulsionIntrauterine DevicesMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RatePregnancy, UnwantedProbabilityProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSpain