MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/tmi.12385

Медицинская библиотека · Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2014

Risk factors associated with human Rift Valley fever infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nicholas Dennis E, Jacobsen Kathryn H, Waters Nigel M

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for human Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) infection.

METHODS

A systematic review identified 17 articles reporting on 16 studies examining risk factors for RVFV. Pooled odds ratios (pOR) were calculated for exposures examined in four or more studies.

RESULTS

Being male [pOR = 1.4 (1.0, 1.8)], contact with aborted animal tissue [pOR = 3.4 (1.6, 7.3)], birthing an animal [pOR = 3.2 (2.4, 4.2)], skinning an animal [pOR = 2.5 (1.9, 3.2)], slaughtering an animal [pOR = 2.4 (1.4, 4.1)] and drinking raw milk [pOR = 1.8 (1.2, 2.6)] were significantly associated with RVF infection after meta-analysis. Other potential risk factors include sheltering animals in the home and milking an animal, which may both involve contact with animal body fluids.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the identified risk factors, use of personal protective equipment and disinfectants by animal handlers may help reduce RVFV transmission during outbreaks. Milk pasteurisation and other possible preventive methods require further investigation.

Для цитирования: Nicholas Dennis E, Jacobsen Kathryn H, Waters Nigel M. Risk factors associated with human Rift Valley fever infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.. Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH. 2014. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12385.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.