MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.005

Медицинская библиотека · Contraception · 2010

Postexposure prophylaxis for victims of sexual assault: treatments and attitudes of emergency department physicians.

Bakhru Arvind, Mallinger Julie B, Fox Michelle C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) are the primary source of care for victims of sexual assault (SA). Provision of emergency contraception (EC) to these women has previously been noted to be sporadic. Completeness of care for victims of SA and the barriers to complete care are further investigated in this study.

STUDY

DESIGN

All ED attending physicians in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia were identified and contacted for participation; 35% completed the survey. Practice patterns were analyzed for the 67% of physicians who do not refer SA victims to other hospitals.

RESULTS

We found that 83% of physicians "always" or "usually" offer EC, but only half prescribe EC more than 48 h postassault. While most (89%) typically offer prophylaxis for STDs other than HIV, only 45% offer or counsel on HIV prophylaxis. Physician attitudes and hospital protocols were significant modifiers.

CONCLUSION

Sexual assault victims are often not offered comprehensive care including prophylaxis against pregnancy and all STDs including HIV. Additional research is warranted to determine why physicians do not routinely offer HIV prophylaxis after SA.

Для цитирования: Bakhru Arvind, Mallinger Julie B, Fox Michelle C. Postexposure prophylaxis for victims of sexual assault: treatments and attitudes of emergency department physicians.. Contraception. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.