The Medical journal of Australia · 1995
Emergency contraception. General practitioner knowledge, attitudes and practices in New South Wales.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weisberg E, Fraser I S, Carrick S E, Wilde F M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of general practitioners in New South Wales regarding the provision of emergency contraception.
DESIGN: Randomised group comparison of 100 rural and 100 urban general practitioners (GPs) by questionnaire.
RESULTS: Eighty-four rural and 76 urban GPs responded. More rural GPs were knowledgeable about emergency contraception than urban GPs (95% v. 78%), and more women knew about it than men. More urban GPs frequently prescribed emergency contraception than rural GPs (26% v. 6%) and female GPs prescribed it more readily than male GPs (22% v. 12%). There was great variation in the regimens prescribed, especially among rural GPs. Twenty-five per cent of urban GPs and 31% of rural GPs did not offer women information about emergency contraception, while 16% of both groups included such information in any discussion about contraceptive options, and 18% gave information only if requested by the woman. More than 60% of the GPs would provide information about emergency contraception as a back-up to use of barrier methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The sex, attitude and knowledge of the GPs influence the likelihood of women being made aware of or being given emergency contraception in NSW. There is a need to further educate both the public and practitioners about emergency contraception.
DESIGN: Randomised group comparison of 100 rural and 100 urban general practitioners (GPs) by questionnaire.
RESULTS: Eighty-four rural and 76 urban GPs responded. More rural GPs were knowledgeable about emergency contraception than urban GPs (95% v. 78%), and more women knew about it than men. More urban GPs frequently prescribed emergency contraception than rural GPs (26% v. 6%) and female GPs prescribed it more readily than male GPs (22% v. 12%). There was great variation in the regimens prescribed, especially among rural GPs. Twenty-five per cent of urban GPs and 31% of rural GPs did not offer women information about emergency contraception, while 16% of both groups included such information in any discussion about contraceptive options, and 18% gave information only if requested by the woman. More than 60% of the GPs would provide information about emergency contraception as a back-up to use of barrier methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The sex, attitude and knowledge of the GPs influence the likelihood of women being made aware of or being given emergency contraception in NSW. There is a need to further educate both the public and practitioners about emergency contraception.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceContraceptive DevicesContraceptives, PostcoitalCounselingDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationEmergenciesFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleNew South WalesPatient Education as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Rural HealthSex FactorsUrban Health