Chest · 1997
The effect of a peak flow-based action plan in the prevention of exacerbations of asthma.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cowie R L, Revitt S G, Underwood M F, Field S K
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a symptom-based and a peak flow-based action plan in preventing acute exacerbations in subjects with poorly controlled asthma.
DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial in which subjects who had required urgent treatment for their asthma were allocated to receive no action plan, a symptom-based plan, or a peak flow-based action plan.
SETTING: A university hospital asthma clinic.
POPULATION: One hundred fifty subjects were recruited after attending an emergency department or a clinic for urgent treatment of asthma.
INTERVENTIONS: All subjects received evaluation and education for asthma before being randomly allocated to receive no action plan, a symptom-based action plan, or a peak flowmeter and a peak flow-based action plan.
MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were assessed by questionnaire at 3 and 6 months after enrollment with questions relating to their asthma control and their need for urgent treatment or hospital admission for asthma.
RESULTS: At 6 months after enrollment, although all three intervention groups experienced improvement in their asthma control, there was a striking reduction in emergency department visits for asthma only in the peak flow-based action plan group (p=0.006). No significant difference in emergency visits was apparent between the symptom-based action plan and no action plan groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a peak flow-based action plan is effective, at least in the short term, in protecting patients with asthma against severe exacerbations of their disease.
DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial in which subjects who had required urgent treatment for their asthma were allocated to receive no action plan, a symptom-based plan, or a peak flow-based action plan.
SETTING: A university hospital asthma clinic.
POPULATION: One hundred fifty subjects were recruited after attending an emergency department or a clinic for urgent treatment of asthma.
INTERVENTIONS: All subjects received evaluation and education for asthma before being randomly allocated to receive no action plan, a symptom-based action plan, or a peak flowmeter and a peak flow-based action plan.
MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were assessed by questionnaire at 3 and 6 months after enrollment with questions relating to their asthma control and their need for urgent treatment or hospital admission for asthma.
RESULTS: At 6 months after enrollment, although all three intervention groups experienced improvement in their asthma control, there was a striking reduction in emergency department visits for asthma only in the peak flow-based action plan group (p=0.006). No significant difference in emergency visits was apparent between the symptom-based action plan and no action plan groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a peak flow-based action plan is effective, at least in the short term, in protecting patients with asthma against severe exacerbations of their disease.