PloS one · 2026
The impact of ethnic self-identity on post-migration social integration of young rural to urban migrants in China: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Tianning
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Post-migration social integration is a pressing concern for young ethnic-minority migrants in urban China. This study examines how ethnic self-identity shapes this integration process from the migrant's own lived perspectives. Using an interpretative phenomenological approach, we regard young migrants as subjects of meaning-making rather than objects to be measured. Ecological systems theory, social identity theory, and social cognitive models provide the analytical frameworks for understanding how ethnic identity is negotiated within destination-city contexts.
METHODS: We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with ethnic migrant youths from Miao, Tujia, and Zangzu (Tibetan) groups who had relocated to Wuhan, Hubei Province. Data were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, with cross-case patterning organized through thematic procedures.
RESULTS: Analysis identified five interconnected experiential dimensions of ethnic self-identity that influence social integration: ethnic self-categorization, ethnic versus local language proficiency, ethnic and cultural practices, perceived ethnicity- based discrimination and bicultural identity integration.
CONCLUSION: Ethnic self-identity functions as a two-sided mechanism: it simultaneously provides psychological protection against discrimination and sustains ethnic group cohesion, yet also creates social boundaries that complicate host-community integration. These findings highlight the need for policies and interventions that address both identity-based support and structural barriers to integration.
METHODS: We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with ethnic migrant youths from Miao, Tujia, and Zangzu (Tibetan) groups who had relocated to Wuhan, Hubei Province. Data were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, with cross-case patterning organized through thematic procedures.
RESULTS: Analysis identified five interconnected experiential dimensions of ethnic self-identity that influence social integration: ethnic self-categorization, ethnic versus local language proficiency, ethnic and cultural practices, perceived ethnicity- based discrimination and bicultural identity integration.
CONCLUSION: Ethnic self-identity functions as a two-sided mechanism: it simultaneously provides psychological protection against discrimination and sustains ethnic group cohesion, yet also creates social boundaries that complicate host-community integration. These findings highlight the need for policies and interventions that address both identity-based support and structural barriers to integration.