Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2012
An investigational ovarian stimulation protocol increased significantly the psychological burden in women with premature ovarian failure.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Awwad Johnny T, Ghazeeri Ghina S, Hannoun Antoine, Isaacson Keith, Abou-Abdallah Michel, Farra Chantal G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychological impact (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) of an investigational ovarian stimulation protocol in women with premature ovarian failure (POF).
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study.
POPULATION: Ten women with POF.
METHODS: Women with idiopathic POF were placed on three consecutive treatment cycles consisting of gonadotropin ovarian stimulation after estrogen priming, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pituitary desensitization, and corticosteroid immune suppression.
RESULTS: Median anxiety and depression scores increased significantly from baseline following three consecutive treatment cycles from 4.0 (range 2.0-8.0) to 11.0 (range 10.0-14.0) (p-value 0.041) and from 1.5 (range 0-6.0) to 9.0 (range 7.0-10.0) (p-value 0.039), respectively. There were nine "probable" anxiety (90%) and three "probable" depression (30%) cases on the final treatment cycle compared with none (0%) on baseline (p-value 0.004 and 0.250, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of investigational ovarian stimulation protocols in women with idiopathic POF was associated with excessive psychological strain. Women with POF should be cautioned against the potentially harmful aspect of similar treatments of unproven benefit.
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study.
POPULATION: Ten women with POF.
METHODS: Women with idiopathic POF were placed on three consecutive treatment cycles consisting of gonadotropin ovarian stimulation after estrogen priming, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pituitary desensitization, and corticosteroid immune suppression.
RESULTS: Median anxiety and depression scores increased significantly from baseline following three consecutive treatment cycles from 4.0 (range 2.0-8.0) to 11.0 (range 10.0-14.0) (p-value 0.041) and from 1.5 (range 0-6.0) to 9.0 (range 7.0-10.0) (p-value 0.039), respectively. There were nine "probable" anxiety (90%) and three "probable" depression (30%) cases on the final treatment cycle compared with none (0%) on baseline (p-value 0.004 and 0.250, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of investigational ovarian stimulation protocols in women with idiopathic POF was associated with excessive psychological strain. Women with POF should be cautioned against the potentially harmful aspect of similar treatments of unproven benefit.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAnxietyBuserelinChorionic GonadotropinDepressionEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansInfertility, FemaleInsemination, ArtificialLongitudinal StudiesMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMenotropinsOvaryOvulation InductionPrednisonePrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproductive Control AgentsUltrasonographyYoung Adult