Assessment of the adequacy of the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Genomics standard for the representation of somatic testing reports.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Enabling the unambiguous communication of cancer genetic testing results and the corresponding therapeutic implications of identified genetic variants is of major clinical importance. In this report, we assess the adequacy of the Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Genomics Reporting Implementation Guide, version 3 (also known as "FHIR Genomics") for the structured communication of semantic objects typically appearing in real-world somatic testing reports.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The GenomeX project team, part of the CodeX FHIR Accelerator, performed the following assessment: (1) gather a convenience sample of public somatic reports; (2) create a representative somatic report that includes a wide range of observations taken from the sample reports; and (3) structure the representative somatic report using the FHIR Genomics standard.
RESULTS
Attempted encodings were categorized into 1 of the 4 buckets: (1) full encoding possible (eg, DNA variants); (2) full encoding with potential variability (eg, therapeutic implications); (3) partial encoding (eg, genomic study details); and (4) not encoded (ie, FHIR Genomics has no explicit or acceptable semantic target, such as for coarsely granular pertinent negatives). In our sample somatic report, 47 semantic objects were noted, of which 87% had either full encoding or full encoding with potential variability.
CONCLUSION
While dynamic real-world requirements, as exemplified by cancer genomics, often arise more rapidly than can be standardized, we conclude that the FHIR Genomics version 3 standard is sufficiently robust for the communication of current actionable somatic testing results.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.