Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology · 2009
[Natural cycle versus ovulation induction cycle in intrauterine insemination].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Li, Liu Qi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of the natural cycle and ovulation induction cycle in intrauterine insemination (IUI) for infertile couples of different ages.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 746 IUI cycles for 363 infertile couples, who were divided into a natural cycle (NC) and an ovulation induction cycle (OIC) group. The two groups were respectively subdivided into a < 35 yr and a > or = 35 yr age group, and, according to the drugs used, the OIC group was again divided into subgroups of clomiphene citrate + Progynova (CC + P), menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and CC + HMG. The rates of clinical pregnancy, abortion and delivery were compared among different groups.
RESULTS: The pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the NC than in the OIC group (11.35% versus 19.61%, P < 0.01), but the rates of abortion and delivery had no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05), nor did the rate of clinical pregnancy among the subgroups of CC + P, HMG and CC + HMG (18.00%, 25.00% and 19.35%, P > 0.05). The < 35-year-old patients showed statistically lower rates of pregnancy and delivery in the NC than in the OIC group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), while the > or = 35-year-olds exhibited no significant differences in the rates of clinical pregnancy, abortion and delivery between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The ovulation induction cycle could achieve a higher pregnancy rate than the natural cycle in IUI, whether with CC + P, HMG or CC + HMG, particularly for the infertile patients under 35 years. But the natural cycle is preferable for the > or = 35-year-olds.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 746 IUI cycles for 363 infertile couples, who were divided into a natural cycle (NC) and an ovulation induction cycle (OIC) group. The two groups were respectively subdivided into a < 35 yr and a > or = 35 yr age group, and, according to the drugs used, the OIC group was again divided into subgroups of clomiphene citrate + Progynova (CC + P), menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and CC + HMG. The rates of clinical pregnancy, abortion and delivery were compared among different groups.
RESULTS: The pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the NC than in the OIC group (11.35% versus 19.61%, P < 0.01), but the rates of abortion and delivery had no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05), nor did the rate of clinical pregnancy among the subgroups of CC + P, HMG and CC + HMG (18.00%, 25.00% and 19.35%, P > 0.05). The < 35-year-old patients showed statistically lower rates of pregnancy and delivery in the NC than in the OIC group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), while the > or = 35-year-olds exhibited no significant differences in the rates of clinical pregnancy, abortion and delivery between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The ovulation induction cycle could achieve a higher pregnancy rate than the natural cycle in IUI, whether with CC + P, HMG or CC + HMG, particularly for the infertile patients under 35 years. But the natural cycle is preferable for the > or = 35-year-olds.