MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/ani16020201

Медицинская библиотека · Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026

Linguistic and Material Ways of Communicating with Cows-The Dung Pusher as a Semiotic Resource.

Jääskeläinen Anni

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study examines how farm workers working with cattle talk to and interact with these non-human animals. This study presents linguistic animal studies and multi-species pragmatics, and it is based on fieldwork, interviews, and video recordings from several types of Finnish dairy farms. This study concentrates especially on one facet of human-cattle interaction: how humans use dung pushers and other sticks when communicating with cows. Thus, it draws on the materiality of language. It is shown how objects, bodies, and spaces, as well as words and linguistic constructions, are meaningful in human-animal interaction. Videoed recordings are analysed with multimodal conversation analysis. It is shown how dung pushers and snow stakes are used when steering cows, making them stand up, and pointing at things. It is then shown how these objects become 'meaning-carriers' for humans and for cows. For example, the dung pusher acquires four different meaning qualities for the human participants in the cattle barns: floor-cleaner quality, shepherd's-crook quality, pointer quality, and weapon quality. The study examines how the cows' and humans' Umwelts, the subjective meaning universes of these species and their constituent individuals, influence interaction on farms and how and why the dung pusher becomes a semiotic resource.

Для цитирования: Jääskeläinen Anni. Linguistic and Material Ways of Communicating with Cows-The Dung Pusher as a Semiotic Resource.. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/ani16020201.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.