MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/24725838.2025.2612656

Медицинская библиотека · IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors · 2026

Comparison of Crane Safety Standards: A Human Factors Perspective.

Tiwari Pratikshya, Zhu Weihang, McSweeney Kevin

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSWe compared offshore crane safety standards in the United States, United Kingdom, and Norway, focusing on human factors contributing to incidents. High similarity was found in maintenance procedures, hand signals, and communication, reflecting shared priorities like adhering to manufacturer recommendations and enforcing substance abuse policies. Moderate alignment was observed in inspection intervals, personal protective equipment requirements, and personnel roles, with some variation in specific practices. Notable gaps were identified in training, lift categorization, and personnel qualifications, with the United States emphasizing certification timelines, while the United Kingdom and Norway focus on ongoing competence. These findings highlight strengths in each standard and offer a roadmap for harmonizing global practices. Practitioners can use these results to benchmark current practices, address gaps, and reduce human error. By aligning international standards, practitioners can develop more effective training, improve communication protocols, and implement consistent safety measures, ultimately enhancing the reliability and safety of offshore lifting operations.

Для цитирования: Tiwari Pratikshya, Zhu Weihang, McSweeney Kevin. Comparison of Crane Safety Standards: A Human Factors Perspective.. IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors. 2026. DOI: 10.1080/24725838.2025.2612656.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.