MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2001

A comparative study of raw and prepared semen samples from two consecutive days.

Makkar G, Ng E H, Yeung W S, Ho P C

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To study and compare raw and prepared semen samples from two consecutive days by conventional sperm parameters, various motility characteristics of spermatozoa determined by computer-aided sperm analysis and calcium ionophore-induced acrosome reaction.

STUDY

DESIGN

Semen samples of male partners in couples undergoing 81 cycles of double intrauterine insemination were studied. The first sample was produced after abstinence of 2-7 days and the second, 24 hours after the first. Both samples were processed by isolate sperm separation medium.

RESULTS

Semen volume, sperm concentration and total motile spermatozoa were significantly reduced in day 2 raw and prepared samples, whereas normal morphology, motility characteristics and percentage of acrosome-reacted spermatozoa increased significantly in day 2 inseminated samples as compared to day 1. Oligospermic, asthenospermic and teratozoospermic samples showed a significant improvement in concentration, various motility characteristics and normal morphology of spermatozoa in day 2 samples as compared to day 1.

CONCLUSION

Men with normal samples showed improvements in normal morphology and acrosome-reacted spermatozoa, whereas those with subnormal semen samples from day 1 showed a significant improvement in concentration, various spermatozoal velocities and normal morphology on day 2.

Для цитирования: Makkar G, Ng E H, Yeung W S, Ho P C. A comparative study of raw and prepared semen samples from two consecutive days.. The Journal of reproductive medicine. 2001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.