MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/healthcare13222934

Медицинская библиотека · Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025

A Study on the Acceptance of Smart Cane Technology Among Chinese Older Adults.

Chen Yibing, An Yi, Chen Zihao, Luh Dingbang, Xia Tiansheng

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

Although smart products improve older adults' quality of life, their acceptance and usage of smart assistive devices remain relatively low, and the influencing factors remain unclear.

Methods

This study takes canes, which are commonly used by older adults, as the research object. To explore older adults' acceptance of smart canes and the influencing factors, we constructed an integrated framework based on the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which incorporates multiple variables: Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Attitude (ATT), Social Influence (SI), Safety Trust (ST), Self-Efficacy (SE), and Behavioral Intention (BI). A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect 232 valid responses, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed for data analysis.

Results

The results indicate that factors including PU, PEOU, and SI have significant impacts on older adults' ATT towards using smart canes, their SE, and BI. Among these factors, ATT and SE play a mediating role between PU, PEOU, SI, and BI in using smart canes.

Conclusions

The practical implications of the current results are discussed with the aim of providing empirical evidence for the development and application of smart assistive devices for older adults.

Для цитирования: Chen Yibing, An Yi, Chen Zihao, Luh Dingbang, Xia Tiansheng. A Study on the Acceptance of Smart Cane Technology Among Chinese Older Adults.. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2025. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13222934.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.