MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10815-022-02409-z

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022

Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.

Vaiarelli Alberto, Cimadomo Danilo, Gennarelli Gianluca, Guido Maurizio, Alviggi Carlo, Conforti Alessandro, Livi Claudia, Revelli Alberto, Colamaria Silvia, Argento Cindy, Giuliani Maddalena, De Angelis Carlo, Matteo Maria, Canosa Stefano, D'Alfonso Angela, Cimadomo Valentino, Rienzi Laura, Ubaldi Filippo Maria

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Our primary objective was to assess whether immediately undergoing a second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) for advanced-maternal-age and/or poor-ovarian-reserve (AMA/POR) patients obtaining ≤ 3 blastocysts for preimplantation-genetic-testing-for-aneuploidies (PGT-A) is more efficient than the conventional-approach.

METHODS

All AMA/POR patients obtaining ≤ 3 blastocysts after conventional-stimulation between 2017 and 2019 were proposed DuoStim, and 143 couples accepted (DuoStim-group) and were matched for the main confounders to 143 couples who did not accept (conventional-group). GnRH-antagonist protocol with recombinant-gonadotrophins and agonist trigger, intra-cytoplasmatic-sperm-injection (ICSI) with ejaculated sperm, PGT-A and vitrified-warmed euploid single-blastocyst-transfer(s) were performed. The primary outcome was the cumulative-live-birth-delivery-rate per intention-to-treat (CLBdR per ITT) within 1 year. If not delivering, the conventional-group had 1 year to undergo another conventional-stimulation. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

The CLBdR was 10.5% in the conventional-group after the first attempt. Only 12 of the 128 non-pregnant patients returned (165 ± 95 days later; drop-out = 116/128,90.6%), and 3 delivered. Thus, the 1-year CLBdR was 12.6% (N = 18/143). In the DuoStim-group, the CLBdR was 24.5% (N = 35/143; p = 0.01), 2 women delivered twice and 13 patients have other euploid blastocysts after a LB (0 and 2 in the conventional-group). DuoStim resulted in an incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio of 23,303€. DuoStim was costlier and more effective in 98.7% of the 1000 pseudo-replicates generated through bootstrapping, and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves unveiled that DuoStim would be more cost-effective than the conventional-approach at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 23,100€.

CONCLUSIONS

During PGT-A treatments in AMA/POR women, DuoStim can be suggested in progress to rescue poor blastocyst yields after conventional-stimulation. It might indeed prevent drop-out or further aging between attempts.

Для цитирования: Vaiarelli Alberto, Cimadomo Danilo, Gennarelli Gianluca, Guido Maurizio, Alviggi Carlo, Conforti Alessandro, Livi Claudia, Revelli Alberto, Colamaria Silvia, Argento Cindy, Giuliani Maddalena, De Angelis Carlo, Matteo Maria, Canosa Stefano, D'Alfonso Angela, Cimadomo Valentino, Rienzi Laura, Ubaldi Filippo Maria. Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02409-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.