Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021
Clinical implementation of algorithm-based embryo selection is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in single vitrified warmed euploid embryo transfers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Friedenthal Jenna, Hernandez-Nieto Carlos, Roth Rose Marie, Slifkin Richard, Gounko Dmitry, Lee Joseph A, Nazem Taraneh, Briton-Jones Christine, Copperman Alan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess whether utilization of a mathematical ranking algorithm for assistance with embryo selection improves clinical outcomes compared with traditional embryo selection via morphologic grading in single vitrified warmed euploid embryo transfers (euploid SETs).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a single, academic center from September 2016 to February 2020 was performed. A total of 4320 euploid SETs met inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Controls included all euploid SETs in which embryo selection was performed by a senior embryologist based on modified Gardner grading (traditional approach). Cases included euploid SETs in which embryo selection was performed using an automated algorithm-based approach (algorithm-based approach). Our primary outcome was implantation rate. Secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate and clinical loss rate.
RESULTS: The implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate were significantly higher when using the algorithm-based approach compared with the traditional approach (65.3% vs 57.8%, p<0.0001 and 54.7% vs 48.1%, p=0.0001, respectively). After adjusting for potential confounding variables, utilization of the algorithm remained significantly associated with improved odds of implantation (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04, 2.18, p=0.03) ongoing pregnancy/live birth (aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.38, 2.86, p=0.0002), and decreased odds of clinical loss (aOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21, 0.84, p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical implementation of an automated mathematical algorithm for embryo ranking and selection is significantly associated with improved implantation and ongoing pregnancy/live birth as compared with traditional embryo selection in euploid SETs.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a single, academic center from September 2016 to February 2020 was performed. A total of 4320 euploid SETs met inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Controls included all euploid SETs in which embryo selection was performed by a senior embryologist based on modified Gardner grading (traditional approach). Cases included euploid SETs in which embryo selection was performed using an automated algorithm-based approach (algorithm-based approach). Our primary outcome was implantation rate. Secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate and clinical loss rate.
RESULTS: The implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate were significantly higher when using the algorithm-based approach compared with the traditional approach (65.3% vs 57.8%, p<0.0001 and 54.7% vs 48.1%, p=0.0001, respectively). After adjusting for potential confounding variables, utilization of the algorithm remained significantly associated with improved odds of implantation (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04, 2.18, p=0.03) ongoing pregnancy/live birth (aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.38, 2.86, p=0.0002), and decreased odds of clinical loss (aOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21, 0.84, p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical implementation of an automated mathematical algorithm for embryo ranking and selection is significantly associated with improved implantation and ongoing pregnancy/live birth as compared with traditional embryo selection in euploid SETs.