EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2019
Personalised fractional flow reserve: a novel concept to optimise myocardial revascularisation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gosling Rebecca C, Morris Paul D, Lawford Patricia V, Hose D Rodney, Gunn Julian P
Аннотация
AIMS: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) represents the percentage reduction in coronary flow relative to a hypothetically normal artery; however, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) seldom achieves physiological normality (FFR 1.00), particularly in the context of diffuse disease. In this study we describe a method for calculating the vessel-specific maximal achievable FFR (FFRmax) providing a personalised assessment of what PCI can achieve.
METHODS AND RESULTS: FFR measurements were obtained from 71 patients (100 arteries) undergoing angiography. Three-dimensional (3D) coronary anatomy was reconstructed from angiographic images. An ideal intervention, in which all stenoses are removed, was modelled, and the FFRmax calculated. The "personalised" FFR (FFRpers) was calculated as measured FFR/FFRmax. PCI was performed in 52 vessels and post-PCI FFR measured in 50. FFRmax was compared to post-PCI measured FFRs. The mean FFRmax was 0.92 (±0.04). This was on average 0.04 (±0.05) higher than the corresponding post-PCI measured FFR (p<0.001). FFRpers was significantly higher (0.06±0.04) than measured FFR (p<0.001), indicating that FFR overestimates flow restoration achievable with PCI.
CONCLUSIONS: A patient's maximal achievable FFR can now be determined prior to PCI. This approach provides a more realistic assessment of the physiological benefit of PCI than is implied by baseline FFR and may prevent unnecessary intervention.
METHODS AND RESULTS: FFR measurements were obtained from 71 patients (100 arteries) undergoing angiography. Three-dimensional (3D) coronary anatomy was reconstructed from angiographic images. An ideal intervention, in which all stenoses are removed, was modelled, and the FFRmax calculated. The "personalised" FFR (FFRpers) was calculated as measured FFR/FFRmax. PCI was performed in 52 vessels and post-PCI FFR measured in 50. FFRmax was compared to post-PCI measured FFRs. The mean FFRmax was 0.92 (±0.04). This was on average 0.04 (±0.05) higher than the corresponding post-PCI measured FFR (p<0.001). FFRpers was significantly higher (0.06±0.04) than measured FFR (p<0.001), indicating that FFR overestimates flow restoration achievable with PCI.
CONCLUSIONS: A patient's maximal achievable FFR can now be determined prior to PCI. This approach provides a more realistic assessment of the physiological benefit of PCI than is implied by baseline FFR and may prevent unnecessary intervention.