Performance of life support breathing apparatus for under-ice diving operations.

INTRODUCTION

Single-hose scuba regulators dived in very cold water may suffer first- or second-stage malfunction, yielding complete occlusion of air flow or massive freeflow that rapidly expends a diver's air supply.

PURPOSE: This study, conducted in Antarctica, evaluated the under-ice performance of a sampling of commercially available regulators.

METHODS

Seventeen science divers logged a total of 305 dives in -1.86°C seawater under 6-meter-thick Antarctic fast-ice over two field seasons in 2008 and 2009. Dive profiles had an average depth of 30 msw and dive time of 29 minutes, including a mandatory three-minute safety stop at 6 msw. Sixty-nine unmodified regulator units (17 models) from 12 different manufacturers underwent standardized pre-dive regulator care and were randomly assigned to divers. Depths and times of onset of second-stage regulator freeflow were recorded.

RESULTS

In 305 dives, there were 65 freeflows. The freeflows were not evenly distributed across the regulator brands. Regulator failure rates fell into two categories (⟨ 11% and ⟩ 26%). The regulators classified for the purpose of the test as "acceptable" (⟨ 11% failure rate: Dive-Rite Jetstream, Sherwood Maximus SRB3600, Poseidon Xstream Deep, Poseidon Jetstream, Sherwood Maximus SRB7600, Poseidon Cyklon, Mares USN22 Abyss) experienced only nine freeflows out of 146 exposures for a 6% overall freeflow incidence. Those classified as "unacceptable" (⟨ 26% failure rate) suffered 56 freeflows out of 159 exposures (35% freeflow incidence.).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to expectations, the pooled incidences for the seven best performing regulators was significantly different by Chi-square test from the 10 remaining regulators (P ⟨ 0.001).