Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2007
Treatment of hydrosalpinx in the patient undergoing assisted reproduction.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Strandell Annika
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with hydrosalpinx are a recognized group with poor prognosis in in-vitro fertilization. This review presents evidence for the effectiveness of different treatment options.
RECENT FINDINGS: Theories explaining the mechanisms behind the impaired outcome of in-vitro fertilization still focus on the hydrosalpingeal fluid. Gamete and embryotoxic effects have been demonstrated, but it is not a consistent finding. Endometrial receptivity may be altered by the reduced expression of cytokines and integrins important to implantation, and reduced endometrial and subendometrial blood flows may play a role. The rationale for treatments to improve the results of in-vitro fertilization is based on interruption of the leakage of hydrosalpinx fluid into the uterine cavity. Laparoscopic salpingectomy has been evaluated in a large randomized trial and proved effective in restoring birth rates. Proximal tubal ligation may also be effective according to one smaller randomized trial. Other suggested methods such as transvaginal drainage have been poorly investigated.
SUMMARY: Pre-in-vitro fertilization salpingectomy is the only method that has proved effective in restoring birth rates in patients with hydrosalpinx. The underlying mechanism explaining reduced implantation and embryo development awaits further research.
RECENT FINDINGS: Theories explaining the mechanisms behind the impaired outcome of in-vitro fertilization still focus on the hydrosalpingeal fluid. Gamete and embryotoxic effects have been demonstrated, but it is not a consistent finding. Endometrial receptivity may be altered by the reduced expression of cytokines and integrins important to implantation, and reduced endometrial and subendometrial blood flows may play a role. The rationale for treatments to improve the results of in-vitro fertilization is based on interruption of the leakage of hydrosalpinx fluid into the uterine cavity. Laparoscopic salpingectomy has been evaluated in a large randomized trial and proved effective in restoring birth rates. Proximal tubal ligation may also be effective according to one smaller randomized trial. Other suggested methods such as transvaginal drainage have been poorly investigated.
SUMMARY: Pre-in-vitro fertilization salpingectomy is the only method that has proved effective in restoring birth rates in patients with hydrosalpinx. The underlying mechanism explaining reduced implantation and embryo development awaits further research.