MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckae093

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of public health · 2024

Genetic counselling legislation and practice in cancer in EU Member States.

McCrary J Matt, Van Valckenborgh Els, Poirel Hélène A, de Putter Robin, van Rooij Jeroen, Horgan Denis, Dierks Marie-Luise, Antonova Olga, Brunet Joan, Chirita-Emandi Adela, Colas Chrystelle, Dalmas Miriam, Ehrencrona Hans, Grima Claire, Janavičius Ramūnas, Klink Barbara, Koczok Katalin, Krajc Mateja, Lace Baiba, Leitsalu Liis, Mistrik Martin, Paneque Milena, Primorac Dragan, Roetzer Katharina M, Ronez Joelle, Slámová Lucie, Spanou Elena, Stamatopoulos Kostas, Stoklosa Tomasz, Strang-Karlsson Sonja, Szakszon Katalin, Szczałuba Krzysztof, Turner Jacqueline, van Dooren Marieke F, van Zelst-Stams Wendy A G, Vassallo Loredana-Maria, Wadt Karin A W, Žigman Tamara, Ripperger Tim, Genuardi Maurizio, Van den Bulcke Marc, Bergmann Anke Katharina

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Somatic and germline genetic alterations are significant drivers of cancer. Increasing integration of new technologies which profile these alterations requires timely, equitable and high-quality genetic counselling to facilitate accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making by patients and their families in preventive and clinical settings. This article aims to provide an overview of genetic counselling legislation and practice across European Union (EU) Member States to serve as a foundation for future European recommendations and action.

METHODS

National legislative databases of all 27 Member States were searched using terms relevant to genetic counselling, translated as appropriate. Interviews with relevant experts from each Member State were conducted to validate legislative search results and provide detailed insights into genetic counselling practice in each country.

RESULTS

Genetic counselling is included in national legislative documents of 22 of 27 Member States, with substantial variation in legal mechanisms and prescribed details (i.e. the 'who, what, when and where' of counselling). Practice is similarly varied. Workforce capacity (25 of 27 Member States) and genetic literacy (all Member States) were common reported barriers. Recognition and/or better integration of genetic counsellors and updated legislation and were most commonly noted as the 'most important change' which would improve practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights substantial variability in genetic counselling across EU Member States, as well as common barriers notwithstanding this variation. Future recommendations and action should focus on addressing literacy and capacity challenges through legislative, regulatory and/or strategic approaches at EU, national, regional and/or local levels.

Для цитирования: McCrary J Matt, Van Valckenborgh Els, Poirel Hélène A, de Putter Robin, van Rooij Jeroen, Horgan Denis, Dierks Marie-Luise, Antonova Olga, Brunet Joan, Chirita-Emandi Adela, Colas Chrystelle, Dalmas Miriam, Ehrencrona Hans, Grima Claire, Janavičius Ramūnas, Klink Barbara, Koczok Katalin, Krajc Mateja, Lace Baiba, Leitsalu Liis, Mistrik Martin, Paneque Milena, Primorac Dragan, Roetzer Katharina M, Ronez Joelle, Slámová Lucie, Spanou Elena, Stamatopoulos Kostas, Stoklosa Tomasz, Strang-Karlsson Sonja, Szakszon Katalin, Szczałuba Krzysztof, Turner Jacqueline, van Dooren Marieke F, van Zelst-Stams Wendy A G, Vassallo Loredana-Maria, Wadt Karin A W, Žigman Tamara, Ripperger Tim, Genuardi Maurizio, Van den Bulcke Marc, Bergmann Anke Katharina. Genetic counselling legislation and practice in cancer in EU Member States.. European journal of public health. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae093.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.