MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Folia medica · 2005

Clinical evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity treatment with 5% potassium nitrate dentifrice.

Tzanova S, Ivanova Z, Velinova S

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To evaluate the desensitizing effect of a Bulgarian-made dentifrice containing 5% potassium nitrate in a double-blind experiment.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

The study included 40 clinically healthy individuals aged 23 to 60 years, who complained of increased sensitivity to thermal, chemical and mechanical stimuli in 462 teeth. The recruited patients were allocated into two groups: 20 patients were treated with the Sensi I dentifrice, and the other 20--the Sensi II dentifrice. The outcome of treatment was evaluated by any alteration in pain sensitiveness in response to different stimuli and changes in the threshold of electrical excitability.

RESULTS

The Sensi I toothpaste (containing 5% potassium nitrate) was found to have a better desensitizing effect than the Sensi II placebo toothpaste (P < 0.01). The Sensi I dentifrice caused a rise in the threshold of electrical excitability of sensitive teeth with clinically intact enamel (P < 0.01), teeth with erosions (P < 0.05) and teeth with exposed root surfaces (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Sensi toothpaste, containing 5% potassium nitrate, demonstrated a pronounced anesthetizing effect; it can be used successfully for treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity of teeth with clinically intact enamel, erosions and exposed root surfaces due to gingival recessions.

Для цитирования: Tzanova S, Ivanova Z, Velinova S. Clinical evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity treatment with 5% potassium nitrate dentifrice.. Folia medica. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.