MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685354

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology · 1996

The role of radiology in the Oklahoma City bombing.

Nye P J, Tytle T L, Jarman R N, Eaton B G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of radiologic services in the assessment of injuries and identification of deceased victims of the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Okla.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In cooperation with the Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center Disaster Studies Group, all victims of the Oklahoma City bombing who were treated in hospitals were evaluated. All radiologic studies performed in these patients during a 4-week period after the bombing were recorded. Major injuries incurred by the victims were noted but were not documented. In addition, assistance provided by radiologic services to the medical examiner's office for identification of deceased victims was assessed.

RESULTS

On the day of the bombing, 99% (480 of 485) of the imaging studies performed were either plain radiography, primarily of the extremities and chest, or computed tomography (CT), half of which were of the head. Six deceased victims were identified solely by means of characteristics on radiographs.

CONCLUSION

Almost all bombing-related radiologic studies were either plain radiography or CT. Other modalities had only limited roles. In deceased victims, plain radiography aided identification, and in many other victims it allowed localization of materials that were potential pieces of evidence.

Для цитирования: Nye P J, Tytle T L, Jarman R N, Eaton B G. The role of radiology in the Oklahoma City bombing.. Radiology. 1996. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685354.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.