MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/dewb.12226

Медицинская библиотека · Developing world bioethics · 2019

Video-recording complex health interactions in a diverse setting: Ethical dilemmas, reflections and recommendations.

Scott Megan, Watermeyer Jennifer, Wessels Tina-Marie

СтатьяPersonal NarrativeПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Video-recording healthcare interactions provides important opportunities for research and service improvement. However, this method brings about tensions, especially when recording sensitive topics. Subsequent reflection may compel the researcher to engage in ethical and moral deliberations. This paper presents experiences from a South African genetic counselling study which made use of video-recordings to understand communicative processes in routine practice. Video-recording as a research method, as well as contextual and process considerations are discussed, such as researching one's own field, issues of trust and anonymity, the challenge of providing true informed consent and capturing details which may cause psychological harm. Several recommendations for research practice in diverse healthcare settings are made. This includes the value of reflective pieces, the importance of retrospective consent, disclosure of the limitations to anonymity, as well as the collective responsibility of those involved to produce ethical research. These recommendations have value for genetic counselling and other healthcare fields.

Для цитирования: Scott Megan, Watermeyer Jennifer, Wessels Tina-Marie. Video-recording complex health interactions in a diverse setting: Ethical dilemmas, reflections and recommendations.. Developing world bioethics. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12226.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.