Journal of vitreoretinal diseases · 2026
Effect of Topical Bromfenac 0.09% on Pain Following Intravitreal Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Achuck Kathryn, Soares Rebecca, Solish Danielle, Popovic Marko, Felfeli Tina, Muni Rajeev, Shah Chirag, Baskin Darrell, Hsu Jason, Garg Sunir
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of topical bromfenac 0.09% on pain following intravitreal (IVT) injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications in patients diagnosed as having choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration or other etiologies, diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, or macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion.
METHODS: A total of 78 adult patients scheduled to receive bilateral anti-VEGF IVT injections were randomized to receive topical bromfenac 0.09% in 1 eye and artificial tears in the fellow eye (control) immediately before the anti-VEGF treatment at 2 academic institutions from March 2021 to June 2022. Pain was evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (score range, 0-10) and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (score range, 0-5) at baseline (preinjection) and 5 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours following injection. Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for statistical comparisons.
RESULTS: In total, 156 eyes were analyzed. Mean baseline pain scores were similar between the bromfenac 0.09% and control groups. Five minutes after injection, eyes randomized to receive bromfenac 0.09% had significantly less pain compared with control eyes receiving artificial tears, on both the Wong-Baker FACES scale (mean raw score, 2.29 vs 2.79; P = .0275) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (mean raw score, 1.13 vs 2.36; P = .0135). No significant difference in pain scores was noted at 6 hours or 24 hours post-IVT injection.
CONCLUSIONS: Bromfenac 0.09% solution administered to the study eye before IVT anti-VEGF injection reduced pain 5 minutes after injection in comparison with artificial tears. There was no difference in pain between the 2 groups at 6 hours or 24 hours post-IVT injection.
METHODS: A total of 78 adult patients scheduled to receive bilateral anti-VEGF IVT injections were randomized to receive topical bromfenac 0.09% in 1 eye and artificial tears in the fellow eye (control) immediately before the anti-VEGF treatment at 2 academic institutions from March 2021 to June 2022. Pain was evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (score range, 0-10) and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (score range, 0-5) at baseline (preinjection) and 5 minutes, 6 hours, and 24 hours following injection. Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used for statistical comparisons.
RESULTS: In total, 156 eyes were analyzed. Mean baseline pain scores were similar between the bromfenac 0.09% and control groups. Five minutes after injection, eyes randomized to receive bromfenac 0.09% had significantly less pain compared with control eyes receiving artificial tears, on both the Wong-Baker FACES scale (mean raw score, 2.29 vs 2.79; P = .0275) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (mean raw score, 1.13 vs 2.36; P = .0135). No significant difference in pain scores was noted at 6 hours or 24 hours post-IVT injection.
CONCLUSIONS: Bromfenac 0.09% solution administered to the study eye before IVT anti-VEGF injection reduced pain 5 minutes after injection in comparison with artificial tears. There was no difference in pain between the 2 groups at 6 hours or 24 hours post-IVT injection.