MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1071/ah070024

Медицинская библиотека · Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association · 2007

Implications of conflicting definitions of probability to health risk communication: a case study of familial cancer and genetic counselling.

O'Doherty Kieran C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The question of what probability actually is has long been debated in philosophy and statistics. Although the concept of probability is fundamental to many applications in the health sciences, these debates are generally not well known to health professionals. This paper begins with an outline of some of the different interpretations of probability. Examples are provided of how each interpretation manifests in clinical practice. The discipline of genetic counselling (familial cancer) is used to ground the discussion. In the second part of the paper, some of the implications that different interpretations of probability may have in practice are examined. The main purpose of the paper is to draw attention to the fact that there is much contention as to the nature of the concept of probability. In practice, this creates the potential for ambiguity and confusion. This paper constitutes a call for deeper engagement with the ways in which probability and risk are understood in health research and practice.

Для цитирования: O'Doherty Kieran C. Implications of conflicting definitions of probability to health risk communication: a case study of familial cancer and genetic counselling.. Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association. 2007. DOI: 10.1071/ah070024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.