MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1044/2026_jslhr-25-00753

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026

False Belief Understanding in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Thomaidou Vaia, Bougioukas Konstantinos I, Peleka Panagiota, Metallidou Panagiota

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the performance of deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children who use cochlear implants (CIs) or hearing aids (HAs) with their typically hearing (TH) peers on false belief (FB) understanding tasks.

METHOD: Data were synthesized from 13 studies comprising 292 participants 1.92-14.03 years of age. A multilevel random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, followed by metaregression to examine the effects of age, mean age at onset, type of hearing amplifier, type of FB task, and method of response.

RESULTS

Results indicated significantly lower performance in DHH children (g = -0.854, 95% confidence interval [-1.110, -0.599], p < .001) compared to their TH peers. Additionally, the CIs/HAs group showed a possible sensitivity when assessed with implicit tasks using eye gazing as a method of response.

CONCLUSION

The results supported previous evidence on the essential role of language in FB skills development and indicated that performance in DHH children may be critically influenced by variability in task demands and method of response.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33228822.

Для цитирования: Thomaidou Vaia, Bougioukas Konstantinos I, Peleka Panagiota, Metallidou Panagiota. False Belief Understanding in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR. 2026. DOI: 10.1044/2026_jslhr-25-00753.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.