DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113468
Mapping diabetic eye exam non-adherence across urban-rural communities: A GIS-based regional analysis of socioeconomic disadvantage in the Rochester, NY Metropolitan Statistical Area.
Аннотация
AIMS: Diabetic eye examinations prevent vision loss, yet adherence varies across communities. We examined ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA)-level socioeconomic and spatial determinants of diabetic eye exam non-adherence across the Rochester, NY Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional GIS analysis of adults with diabetes in a university-affiliated primary care network. Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)-defined eye exam adherence was aggregated by patient address ZIP code to ZCTAs. Predictors were poverty rate, Medicaid enrollment, and rurality. Analyses included community-type comparisons, ordinary least-squares regression, stratified regression, and bivariate choropleth mapping.
RESULTS
Mean non-adherence was 33.2%. Mean rates were similar in urban, suburban, and rural ZCTAs (33.2%, 31.9%, and 33.7%; F = 0.23, p = 0.795), although rural ZCTAs showed greater variability. Poverty was associated with non-adherence in univariate analysis (β = 0.304, p < 0.001) and after adjustment for rurality and Medicaid enrollment (β = 0.342, p < 0.001). Medicaid enrollment was significant only in univariate analysis. Rurality was not associated overall. GIS maps showed overlap between high non-adherence, poverty, and Medicaid in urban core ZCTAs.
CONCLUSIONS
GIS mapping can help health systems identify priority ZCTAs for teleophthalmology, mobile eye care, patient navigation, referral support, and targeted primary care outreach.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.