MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fmed.2026.1842016

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in medicine · 2026

Benchmark evaluation of multi-modal large language models for ophthalmic diagnosis in real world.

Huang Shoujun, Chen Junhong, Wang Jiaoman, Zhang Ping, Du Wending, Hong Yuan, Kong Dexing, Lou Wei, Lai Mingying, Yang Weihua

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly demonstrating substantial potential in the medical domain, particularly in image-intensive specialties such as ophthalmology. Although cutting-edge models like ChatGPT-4o and Qwen-VL 2.5 have shown strong performance on general-domain tasks, real-world clinical benchmarks for rigorously assessing their diagnostic capabilities in specialized medical contexts remain limited. To address this gap, we constructed a carefully curated benchmark dataset comprising 295 pathologically confirmed ophthalmic cases with representative clinical presentations. Using this dataset, we systematically evaluated nine leading MLLMs, including both open-source and proprietary models. The results showed that models such as HAIBU-ReMUD and ChatGPT-4o achieved comparatively strong diagnostic accuracy and consistency, with performance in some settings approaching that of human experts. These findings suggest that current MLLMs are showing encouraging feasibility for real-world clinical applications and provide a basis for further investigation of their integration into ophthalmology practice.

Для цитирования: Huang Shoujun, Chen Junhong, Wang Jiaoman, Zhang Ping, Du Wending, Hong Yuan, Kong Dexing, Lou Wei, Lai Mingying, Yang Weihua. Benchmark evaluation of multi-modal large language models for ophthalmic diagnosis in real world.. Frontiers in medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1842016.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.