Медицинская библиотека · International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2020

Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Lyubenova Anita, Neupane Dipika, Levis Brooke, Wu Yin, Sun Ying, He Chen, Krishnan Ankur, Bhandari Parash M, Negeri Zelalem, Imran Mahrukh, Rice Danielle B, Azar Marleine, Chiovitti Matthew J, Saadat Nazanin, Riehm Kira E, Boruff Jill T, Ioannidis John P A, Cuijpers Pim, Gilbody Simon, Kloda Lorie A, Patten Scott B, Shrier Ian, Ziegelstein Roy C, Comeau Liane, Mitchell Nicholas D, Tonelli Marcello, Vigod Simone N, Aceti Franca, Barnes Jacqueline, Bavle Amar D, Beck Cheryl T, Bindt Carola, Boyce Philip M, Bunevicius Adomas, Chaudron Linda H, Favez Nicolas, Figueiredo Barbara, Garcia-Esteve Lluïsa, Giardinelli Lisa, Helle Nadine, Howard Louise M, Kohlhoff Jane, Kusminskas Laima, Kozinszky Zoltán, Lelli Lorenzo, Leonardou Angeliki A, Meuti Valentina, Radoš Sandra N, García Purificación N, Pawlby Susan J, Quispel Chantal, Robertson-Blackmore Emma, Rochat Tamsen J, Sharp Deborah J, Siu Bonnie W M, Stein Alan, Stewart Robert C, Tadinac Meri, Tandon S Darius, Tendais Iva, Töreki Annamária, Torres-Giménez Anna, Tran Thach D, Trevillion Kylee, Turner Katherine, Vega-Dienstmaier Johann M, Benedetti Andrea, Thombs Brett D

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies.

METHODS

We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID.

RESULTS

Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (≥9 to ≥14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS ≥ 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS ≥ 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS ≥14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%).

CONCLUSION

EPDS ≥14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation.

Для цитирования: Lyubenova Anita, Neupane Dipika, Levis Brooke, Wu Yin, Sun Ying, He Chen, Krishnan Ankur, Bhandari Parash M, Negeri Zelalem, Imran Mahrukh, Rice Danielle B, Azar Marleine, Chiovitti Matthew J, Saadat Nazanin, Riehm Kira E, Boruff Jill T, Ioannidis John P A, Cuijpers Pim, Gilbody Simon, Kloda Lorie A, Patten Scott B, Shrier Ian, Ziegelstein Roy C, Comeau Liane, Mitchell Nicholas D, Tonelli Marcello, Vigod Simone N, Aceti Franca, Barnes Jacqueline, Bavle Amar D, Beck Cheryl T, Bindt Carola, Boyce Philip M, Bunevicius Adomas, Chaudron Linda H, Favez Nicolas, Figueiredo Barbara, Garcia-Esteve Lluïsa, Giardinelli Lisa, Helle Nadine, Howard Louise M, Kohlhoff Jane, Kusminskas Laima, Kozinszky Zoltán, Lelli Lorenzo, Leonardou Angeliki A, Meuti Valentina, Radoš Sandra N, García Purificación N, Pawlby Susan J, Quispel Chantal, Robertson-Blackmore Emma, Rochat Tamsen J, Sharp Deborah J, Siu Bonnie W M, Stein Alan, Stewart Robert C, Tadinac Meri, Tandon S Darius, Tendais Iva, Töreki Annamária, Torres-Giménez Anna, Tran Thach D, Trevillion Kylee, Turner Katherine, Vega-Dienstmaier Johann M, Benedetti Andrea, Thombs Brett D. Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.. International journal of methods in psychiatric research. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1860.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Depression Depression, Postpartum Major Depressive Disorder Female Humans Pregnancy Prevalence Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

Подготовка и перевод публикации

Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление

Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.