MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12028-008-9087-6

Медицинская библиотека · Neurocritical care · 2008

The coagulopathy of acute liver failure and implications for intracranial pressure monitoring.

Munoz Santiago J, Rajender Reddy K, Lee William, Acute Liver Failure Study Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The development of coagulopathy in acute liver failure (ALF) is universal. The severity of the coagulopathy is often assessed by determination of the prothrombin time and International Normalized Ratio (INR).

DISCUSSION: In more than 1,000 ALF cases, the severity of the coagulopathy was moderate in 81% (INR 1.5-5.0), severe in 14% (INR 5.0-10.0), and very severe in 5% (INR > 10.0). Certain etiologies were associated with more severe coagulopathy, whereas ALF caused by fatty liver of pregnancy had the least severe coagulopathy.

METHODS

Management consisted of transfusions of FFP in 92%. Overall, FFP administered during the first week of admission amounted to 13.7 +/- 15 units.

RESULTS

Patients who received an ICP monitor had significantly more FFP transfused than those managed without ICP monitor (22.7 +/- 2.4 vs. 12.3 +/- 0.8 units FFP; P < 0.001). Only a minority of patients developed gastrointestinal bleeding or had an intracranial pressure monitor installed.

CONCLUSION

Further research is necessary to explore the reasons clinicians transfuse ALF patients with large amounts of FFP in the absence of active bleeding or invasive procedures.

Для цитирования: Munoz Santiago J, Rajender Reddy K, Lee William, Acute Liver Failure Study Group. The coagulopathy of acute liver failure and implications for intracranial pressure monitoring.. Neurocritical care. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-008-9087-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.