Renal failure · 2018
Assessment of preeclampsia risk by use of serum ionized magnesium-based equation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kreepala Chatchai, Kitporntheranunt Maethaphan, Sangwipasnapaporn Worrawat, Rungsrithananon Warit, Wattanavaekin Krittanont
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a common medical complication in pregnancy. It has been reported to be associated with decreased serum magnesium levels. However, there has not been evidence demonstrating utilization of change in magnesium for prediction of preeclampsia. The purpose of this study was to develop magnesium fraction-based equations which took other significant clinical risk factors into consideration for prediction of preeclampsia.
METHODS: We collected serum total and ionized magnesium ionized magnesium levels from 84 pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia after week 20 of pregnancy. The ionized magnesium fraction was then calculated by the percentage ratio of ionized and total magnesium level.
RESULTS: Sixty-four (76.19%) women had normal pregnancy and 20 (23.81%) developed preeclampsia. The ionized magnesium fraction was significantly lower in preeclampsia group (23.95 ± 4.7% vs. 26.28 ± 2.3%, p = .04). Additionally, lower ionized magnesium fraction (24.67%), teenage and elderly primigravida were significantly associated with preeclampsia (OR = 4.41, 95% CI: 1.46-13.40, OR = 5.47, 95% CI: 1.85-35.42 and OR = 11.11, 95% CI: 1.09-113.78, respectively). Consequently, we attempted to develop ionized magnesium fraction-based equations calculate risk scores for preeclampsia. The area of ROC for predictive accuracy of the model was 0.77 (p < .001) and ROC suggested that the score of 0.27 would be a threshold for screening preeclampsia with 70% sensitivity and 81% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: Ionized magnesium fraction may have been appropriate for screening of preeclampsia. We suggested blood testing on total and ionized magnesium concentrations as well as calculation of ionized magnesium fraction in addition to routine antenatal care for better screening of the disease.
METHODS: We collected serum total and ionized magnesium ionized magnesium levels from 84 pregnant women diagnosed with preeclampsia after week 20 of pregnancy. The ionized magnesium fraction was then calculated by the percentage ratio of ionized and total magnesium level.
RESULTS: Sixty-four (76.19%) women had normal pregnancy and 20 (23.81%) developed preeclampsia. The ionized magnesium fraction was significantly lower in preeclampsia group (23.95 ± 4.7% vs. 26.28 ± 2.3%, p = .04). Additionally, lower ionized magnesium fraction (24.67%), teenage and elderly primigravida were significantly associated with preeclampsia (OR = 4.41, 95% CI: 1.46-13.40, OR = 5.47, 95% CI: 1.85-35.42 and OR = 11.11, 95% CI: 1.09-113.78, respectively). Consequently, we attempted to develop ionized magnesium fraction-based equations calculate risk scores for preeclampsia. The area of ROC for predictive accuracy of the model was 0.77 (p < .001) and ROC suggested that the score of 0.27 would be a threshold for screening preeclampsia with 70% sensitivity and 81% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: Ionized magnesium fraction may have been appropriate for screening of preeclampsia. We suggested blood testing on total and ionized magnesium concentrations as well as calculation of ionized magnesium fraction in addition to routine antenatal care for better screening of the disease.