MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/ani16111714

Медицинская библиотека · Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026

Phytase in Pig Diets: Technical and Economic Evaluation.

Sanches Danilo de Souza, Kiefer Charles, Brumatti Ricardo Carneiro, Nascimento Karina Marcia Ribeiro de Souza, Santos Luan Souza Dos, Corassa Anderson, Garcia Elis Regina de Moraes, de Andrade Gislaine da Cunha, Giannesi Giovana Cristina

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Despite the widespread use of phytase in swine diets, there is a need to update the current evidence on its effects on performance, carcass traits, and economic outcomes. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of phytase supplementation on growth performance, carcass traits, and economic returns in growing-finishing pigs, combining meta-analysis with economic modeling. A systematic review (Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Scopus) revealed 1049 studies, 17 of which met the inclusion criteria (PRISMA). Three treatments were considered: a basal diet (BD), a reduced-P diet without phytase (DRP), and a reduced-P diet with phytase (DRP + P), with effect sizes expressed as weighted mean differences (WMDs). The meta-analysis included performance traits (daily feed intake, DFI; daily weight gain, DWG; feed conversion, FC; and final weight, FW) and carcass traits (carcass weight, CW; carcass yield, CY; backfat thickness, BT; loin eye area, LEA; lean meat percentage, LMP; and lean meat yield, LMY). With respect to BD vs. DRP, P reduction impaired performance and decreased ADG, DFI, and final weight (p < 0.001), especially at reductions ≥0.12%. In DRP + P vs. BD, phytase had no significant effects on performance (WMD = 0.008 kg/day) or carcass traits. In DRP + P vs. DRP, phytase improved performance (ADG: +0.068 kg/day; DFI: +0.106 kg/day; FW: +4.630 kg; FC: -0.115; p < 0.001), with stronger effects in males and at greater P reductions. In DRP + P vs. DB, carcass traits were not significantly affected, whereas DB vs. DRP reduced LEA (WMD = -1.820, p < 0.00), and DRP + P vs. DRP produced subgroup-dependent changes in CW, LEA, and LMY according to sex, phytase source, and diet composition. Economically, phytase increased profit by up to US$ 2.66 (vs. BD) and US$ 5.14 (vs. DRP), remaining advantageous even with enzyme price increases of up to 4×. Overall, phytase supplementation improved performance and economic returns, representing an effective strategy for the development of swine production systems.

Для цитирования: Sanches Danilo de Souza, Kiefer Charles, Brumatti Ricardo Carneiro, Nascimento Karina Marcia Ribeiro de Souza, Santos Luan Souza Dos, Corassa Anderson, Garcia Elis Regina de Moraes, de Andrade Gislaine da Cunha, Giannesi Giovana Cristina. Phytase in Pig Diets: Technical and Economic Evaluation.. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/ani16111714.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.