m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Annals of hematology · 2026

Natural killer cells, macrophages and dendritic cells as innate immune therapies for blood cancers.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Oriquat G, Abdulsahib WK, Abdulsahib WK, Ismael SH, Roopashree R, Patro PS, Nellore J, Mukherjee G, Chauhan AS, Musayeva S

Аннотация

Innate immune cells are emerging as powerful allies in the fight against blood cancers. Natural Killer (NK) cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs)—once viewed mainly as supporting players—are now at the forefront of next-generation immunotherapies, owing to their rapid, antigen-independent tumor recognition and potent effector functions. This review highlights their distinct anti-tumor roles: NK cells’ cytotoxicity and “missing-self” recognition, the dual and adaptable nature of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment (TME), and the antigen-presenting capabilities of DCs that bridge innate and adaptive immunity. We further examine transformative therapeutic strategies, including adoptive NK cell transfer, CAR-engineered NK cells (CAR-NK), CAR-macrophages (CAR-M), and DC vaccines, with a focus on clinical outcomes and safety—particularly the encouraging toxicity profile of CAR-NK cells. Despite these advances, major challenges persist, including limited persistence and homing of infused cells, TME-driven immunosuppression, and potential on-target/off-tumor effects. To overcome these barriers, synergistic approaches that integrate innate immune therapies with checkpoint inhibitors, conventional treatments, innovative engineering, and precise modulation of the TME will be essential. These strategies hold the promise of translating scientific breakthroughs into durable, safe, and widely accessible treatments for patients with hematological malignancies.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Introduction

The immune system plays a central role in protecting the host against both infectious agents and malignant transformation. This defense relies on coordinated interactions between innate and adaptive immune components that together determine whether abnormal cells are eliminated or allowed to persist. Innate immunity represents the first line of defense and is characterized by rapid, antigen-independent responses that are particularly relevant during the early stages of tumor development. Among innate immune cells, natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) have emerged as key regulators of cancer immunosurveillance and therapeutic response [ 1 , 2 ].

For many years, cancer immunotherapy has focused predominantly on adaptive immune mechanisms, particularly T cell–mediated responses, which have led to major therapeutic advances. However, the inherent capabilities of innate immune cells, which include their antigen-independent recognition of malignant cells, swift effector functions, and a generally favorable safety profile with reduced off-target toxicities, position them as highly attractive targets for novel therapeutic interventions, especially within the context of hematological malignancies [ 1 , 3 ]. The rapid and non-specific nature of innate immunity confers a distinct advantage in the initial control of tumor progression compared to the comparatively slower, antigen-specific responses characteristic of adaptive immunity. This inherent speed and broad recognition suggest that harnessing innate immune cells could provide a quicker therapeutic onset, a particularly critical factor in the management of aggressive blood cancers where rapid intervention can significantly impact patient outcomes [ 4 ].

Despite their intrinsic potency, tumors have evolved sophisticated strategies to suppress immune responses, leading to pervasive immune evasion [ 1 ]. The development of complex signaling pathways by tumors to subvert immune surveillance highlights a fundamental challenge: even the most potent innate immune cells face a formidable battle against an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). This necessitates therapeutic strategies that extend beyond mere activation of innate cells; they must also actively counteract the TME-mediated suppression to ensure sustained and effective anti-tumor responses [ 5 ]. This comprehensive review will delve into the fundamental biology of NK cells, macrophages, and DCs, explore their current applications in the immunotherapy of blood cancers, critically assess the challenges encountered during [ 6 ]clinical translation, and illuminate innovative strategies aimed at enhancing their anti-tumor efficacy [ 7 ]. To strengthen coverage of recent advances, we updated the NK cell sections using a structured PubMed search combining terms related to NK cell therapy, hematological malignancies, CAR-NK cells, and tumor microenvironment–mediated immune suppression, with emphasis on clinically relevant studies and major mechanistic reviews [ 8 – 11 ].

Natural killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapies for blood cancers

Fundamental anti-tumor mechanisms of NK cells

Natural Killer (NK) cells are circulating innate lymphocytes endowed with the remarkable ability to directly eliminate metastatic cancer cells without requiring prior activation by antigen-presenting cells [ 1 ]. Their discovery in the 1970s stemmed from their spontaneous reactivity against tumor cells [ 12 , 13 ]. The cytotoxic prowess of NK cells is meticulously regulated by a delicate balance between activating and inhibitory receptors expressed on their surface [ 1 ]. Upon engagement with target cells, NK cells unleash their cytotoxic potential by releasing granules containing perforin and granzymes, which induce target cell death [ 12 , 14 ].

An important mechanism of NK cell-mediated anti-tumor activity is the “missing self” recognition mechanism. Through this process, NK cells efficiently detect and rapidly destroy tumor cells that have downregulated their Major Histocompatibility Complex class I (MHC-I) expression [ 1 , 15 ]. This mechanism is particularly relevant for blood cancers, as malignant cells frequently downregulate MHC-I as a strategy to evade detection and elimination by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. NK cells are uniquely equipped to target a common immune evasion strategy employed by cancer, rendering them invaluable in scenarios where T-cell responses might be compromised due to antigen presentation issues [ 16 ]. Beyond their direct cytotoxic capabilities, NK cells function as crucial orchestrators of broader immune responses. They secrete a repertoire of cytokines, including interferon-gamma (IFNγ), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), along with various chemokines [ 17 ]. These soluble mediators serve to activate other immune cells, such as T and B cells, thereby amplifying and boosting adaptive immunity [ 1 , 18 ]. Furthermore, a fascinating aspect of NK cell biology is the existence of a subgroup that can exhibit memory-like recall responses, blurring the traditional distinctions between innate and adaptive immunity [ 1 , 19 ]. Their inherent ability to circulate extensively within the blood and lymphatic streams empowers NK cells to effectively contain hematological malignancies and control metastatic dissemination throughout the body [ 12 , 20 , 21 ]. In addition to direct recognition of malignant cells, NK cells play a central role in mediating the therapeutic effects of antibody-based immunotherapies through Fc receptor–dependent mechanisms.

Monoclonal antibodies, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and NK cell engagers in blood cancers

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent one of the earliest and most successful forms of cancer immunotherapy and remain a cornerstone of treatment for several hematological malignancies. A major mechanism underlying their clinical efficacy is antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), a process primarily mediated by NK cells through engagement of the Fc receptor CD16 (FcγRIIIa). Upon binding of the antibody Fc region to CD16, NK cells become activated and induce targeted killing of antibody-coated malignant cells through the release of cytotoxic granules and pro-inflammatory cytokines [ 22 , 23 ].

In B-cell malignancies, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab, obinutuzumab, and ofatumumab are widely used in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Their therapeutic activity relies not only on direct signaling effects but also on efficient recruitment of NK cells to mediate ADCC, which has been shown to correlate with clinical response [ 12 , 20 – 23 ]. Similarly, in multiple myeloma, the anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody elotuzumab is approved for clinical use and exerts its anti-myeloma activity largely through NK cell activation and ADCC, highlighting the central role of NK cells in antibody-based immunotherapy [ 12 , 20 , 21 ].

Beyond conventional monoclonal antibodies, next-generation NK cell–engaging platforms have been developed to further enhance ADCC. Bispecific killer cell engagers (BiKEs) are engineered molecules that simultaneously bind CD16 on NK cells and tumor-associated antigens on malignant cells, thereby promoting targeted NK cell activation. Trispecific killer cell engagers (TriKEs) extend this concept by incorporating an additional stimulatory component, often interleukin-15 (IL-15), to enhance NK cell proliferation, persistence, and cytotoxic function. Early preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that BiKEs and TriKEs can significantly augment NK cell–mediated anti-tumor responses in hematological malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma, offering a promising bridge between antibody therapy and adoptive NK cell approaches [ 24 – 26 ].

Collectively, monoclonal antibodies, BiKEs, and TriKEs underscore the therapeutic relevance of endogenous NK cells and highlight how NK cell–mediated cytotoxicity can be effectively harnessed without the need for cellular infusion. These strategies complement adoptive NK cell transfer and CAR-NK therapies and provide flexible, off-the-shelf immunotherapeutic options for patients with blood cancers.

Adoptive NK cell transfer strategies and clinical outcomes

Recent leukemia-focused syntheses summarize the major NK therapeutic modalities across leukemia subtypes and highlight key translational barriers, including persistence, trafficking, and leukemic immune evasion [ 9 , 27 ]. Clinical investigations have explored diverse sources of NK cells for ACT, including ex vivo expanded NK cell lines (e.g., NK-92), peripheral blood-derived NK cells, and umbilical cord blood-derived NK cells [ 27 , 28 ]. These therapeutic approaches have demonstrated varying degrees of efficacy, ranging from transient anti-leukemia activity to sustained remission in carefully selected patient cohorts [ 27 , 29 ]. A significant advantage of NK cell ACT lies in its generally favorable safety profile, characterized by a minimal incidence of severe adverse effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [ 30 ]. For instance, a Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating “off-the-shelf” activated NK cells (aNK) in patients with refractory/relapsed AML reported no dose-limiting toxicities or any grade 3–4 toxicities definitively related to aNK cell infusions [ 31 , 32 ].

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-NK cell advancements and their unique advantages

Building upon the success of T cell engineering, NK cells can also be genetically modified with Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CARs) to precisely direct their specificity towards malignant cells [ 30 ]. CAR-NK cells present several unique advantages over their CAR-T cell counterparts. They may exhibit reduced sensitivity to tumor escape mechanisms caused by CAR antigen loss, primarily because they retain their intrinsic CAR-independent cytotoxicity [ 30 , 33 ]. Furthermore, CAR-NK cells demonstrate a significantly reduced risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). This improved safety profile is directly attributable to the intrinsic biology of NK cells, which secrete substantially lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and IL-10, upon engaging with target cells compared to T cells [ 30 , 34 ]. This causal link implies that CAR-NK therapies could offer a significantly safer and more tolerable treatment profile, potentially broadening their applicability to a wider patient population, including those who may be less tolerant of the high-grade toxicities sometimes associated with CAR-T cell therapies [ 35 ]. This favorable safety profile may allow CAR-NK cells to be combined with other immunotherapeutic or cytotoxic agents that are difficult to administer alongside CAR-T cells [ 35 , 36 ]. Early clinical data in CD19-positive B-cell malignancies support the feasibility of cord blood–derived CAR-NK cells, including encouraging response rates and a low incidence of major toxic effects such as severe CRS or neurotoxicity [ 30 , 37 ]. Additionally, CAR-NK cells may mitigate on-target, off-tumor side effects, such as bone marrow suppression, which can occur with some CAR-T cell therapies that target antigens also expressed on hematopoietic stem cells (e.g., CD33) [ 38 ]. Current research is intensely focused on strategies to enhance CAR-NK cell persistence, broaden their therapeutic targets, and refine manufacturing processes to improve accessibility and scalability [ 30 , 39 , 40 ] (Fig. 1 ). Fig. 1 Overview of NK cell–based immunotherapy strategies in blood cancers. ( A ) Adoptive NK cell transfer: NK cells derived from peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood, or NK cell lines are expanded and activated ex vivo using cytokines and growth factors prior to infusion to target malignant cells. ( B ) CAR-NK cells: NK cells are genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), enhancing tumor specificity while retaining native NK receptor–mediated cytotoxicity. ( C ) Key advantages of CAR-NK therapy compared with CAR-T therapy: CAR-NK cells have demonstrated a lower incidence of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity in early clinical studies and may reduce antigen-escape risk through CAR-independent killing mechanisms

Fig. 1 Overview of NK cell–based immunotherapy strategies in blood cancers. ( A ) Adoptive NK cell transfer: NK cells derived from peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood, or NK ce…
Fig. 1 Overview of NK cell–based immunotherapy strategies in blood cancers. ( A ) Adoptive NK cell transfer: NK cells derived from peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood, or NK cell lines are expanded and activated ex vivo using cytokines and growth factors prior to infusion to target malignant cells. ( B ) CAR-NK cells: NK cells are genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), enhancing tumor specificity while retaining native NK receptor–mediated cytotoxicity. ( C ) Key advantages of CAR-NK therapy compared with CAR-T therapy: CAR-NK cells have demonstrated a lower incidence of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity in early clinical studies and may reduce antigen-escape risk through CAR-independent killing mechanisms

Challenges in NK cell therapy: Persistence, homing, and tumor microenvironment resistance

Despite the encouraging clinical outcomes, persistent challenges continue to limit the widespread efficacy of NK cell-based therapies. These include limited NK cell persistence in vivo, the potential for disease relapse, and considerable heterogeneity in patient responses [ 27 ]. The therapeutic effectiveness of NK cell infusion, particularly against solid tumors, is significantly hampered by inadequate tumor infiltration and insufficient persistence and activation within the complex tumor microenvironment (TME) [ 41 ].

The TME presents a formidable array of barriers that causally contribute to NK cell dysfunction and impaired activity. Recent work has detailed how the tumor microenvironment suppresses NK-cell metabolism, trafficking, and receptor signaling, contributing to reduced cytotoxicity and impaired persistence. In addition to soluble mediators such as TGF-β and adenosine, suppressive myeloid populations and chronic stimulation can drive dysfunctional NK phenotypes within tumors and leukemic niches, emphasizing that overcoming microenvironmental suppression is central to effective NK-based immunotherapy [ 6 , 8 , 10 ]. These include: Metabolic features: Hypoxia, elevated levels of adenosine, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and prostaglandins negatively impact NK cell activity and survival [ 37 , 41 ]. Cellular components: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) actively suppress NK cell-dependent anti-cancer immunity [ 41 , 42 ].

The various TME factors, both metabolic and cellular, actively suppress NK cell function. This indicates that simply infusing NK cells, even highly potent ones, may be insufficient if the TME remains hostile. Therefore, future therapeutic strategies must not only enhance the intrinsic properties of NK cells, such as their persistence and homing capabilities, but also actively modulate or “reprogram” the TME to establish a more permissive environment conducive to sustained NK cell function [ 43 , 44 ]. This underscores the critical need for multi-pronged approaches that combine cell therapy with TME-targeting agents. In myeloid leukemia (ML), NK cells frequently exhibit more severe functional exhaustion compared to T cells, characterized by impaired cytotoxicity, reduced cytokine production, and diminished proliferative capacity, further highlighting the impact of the TME on NK cell efficacy [ 45 ].

Strategies to enhance NK cell cytotoxic activity and clinical efficacy

To overcome the existing limitations, novel protocols are being developed to enhance NK cell expansion and persistence [ 45 ]. Strategies aimed at improving NK cell cytotoxicity ex vivo include treatment with various cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-15, IL-2, or a combination of IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 [ 24 , 25 ]. The use of feeder cell lines, including K562, RPMI8866, or EBV-LCL, often genetically altered to express specific factors, also serves to boost NK cell expansion and activation [ 24 , 26 ].

Enhancing the homing and migration of NK cells to tumor sites is a crucial area of research. Factors such as integrins, selectins, and chemokine receptors (e.g., S1P5, CX3CR1, CXCR4, VLA-4, CCL3, CXCR6, CCR5, CCL25-CCR9) play significant roles in regulating NK cell trafficking and recruitment to peripheral tissues, including the TME [ 45 – 47 ]. Interestingly, conventional chemotherapy can paradoxically enhance anti-tumor immunity. It achieves this by inducing immunogenic cell death, which leads to the release of tumor-associated antigens and damage-associated molecular patterns that activate immune responses [ 48 , 49 ]. Chemotherapy can also promote dendritic cell maturation and improve CD8 + T cell activation through efficient antigen presentation [ 48 ]. Furthermore, certain chemotherapeutic agents can enhance NK cell infiltration into tumors by modulating the TME and immune responses, upregulating NK cell-activating ligands on cancer cells, and promoting the release of activating cytokines like IL-2 and IFN-γ [ 48 , 50 ]. This suggests that chemotherapy can prime the TME for subsequent NK cell-based therapies. Personalized therapeutic approaches, guided by the specific characteristics of NK cell subsets (e.g., CD16 + expression or elevated NKG2A + NK cell infiltration within the TME), may involve combination strategies with monoclonal antibodies (e.g., anti-CD20) or co-administration with NKG2A inhibitors (e.g., monalizumab) to optimize therapeutic outcomes [ 45 , 51 ].

Macrophage-based immunotherapies for blood cancers

The dual role of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment: M1 vs. M2 polarization

Macrophages are highly abundant innate immune cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME), present throughout all stages of tumor progression. 3 While macrophages possess inherent tumoricidal capabilities when activated in vitro, they paradoxically adopt a predominantly pro-tumoral phenotype in vivo, particularly within established tumors [ 52 , 53 ]. This pro-tumoral phenotype, often referred to as M2-like polarization, is consistently associated with poor prognosis across many cancer types, including various hematologic malignancies [ 54 , 55 ].

M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) actively contribute to tumor progression through a multitude of mechanisms. They stimulate angiogenesis, enhance tumor cell invasion, motility, intravasation, and extravasation, and promote persistent tumor growth [ 52 , 56 ]. Critically, these TAMs also induce profound immunosuppression within the TME, actively preventing effective anti-tumor attacks by NK cells and T cells [ 52 , 57 ]. However, classically activated M1 macrophages are recognized for their anti-tumoral functions, exhibiting robust Th1-like inflammatory responses [ 58 , 59 ]. The TME, heavily influenced by signals from tumor cells and various cytokines (e.g., TGF-β, lactic acid, sonic hedgehog (Shh)), causally biases macrophages towards the M2 pro-tumoral phenotype [ 52 , 60 ]. Thus, simply activating macrophages might be insufficient; a sustained anti-tumor effect requires strategies to actively repolarize or prevent M2 polarization. This makes TME modulation a critical co-strategy for any macrophage-based immunotherapy [ 61 ].

Strategies for repolarizing tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)

Given their remarkable plasticity, macrophages are highly responsive to environmental stimuli, presenting unique opportunities for therapeutic re-differentiation or targeted ablation [ 52 , 62 , 63 ]. A key therapeutic objective in cancer immunotherapy is the repolarization of TAMs from their pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype to an anti-tumorigenic M1 phenotype [ 64 , 65 ]. Emerging strategies to achieve this include targeting macrophage-derived and cancer cell-derived exosomes, which are known mediators of tumor immune evasion and M2 polarization [ 64 , 66 ]. Bacterial therapy also represents a novel approach, utilizing specific bacterial strains that stimulate M1 polarization (e.g., Listeria monocytogenes ) to induce the repolarization of TAMs [ 64 ]. Furthermore, nanocarriers are being investigated as precise delivery systems for therapeutic agents into the TME, aiming to selectively repolarize M2 macrophages [ 64 , 67 , 68 ].

Adoptive macrophage transfer and its therapeutic potential

Adoptively transferred macrophages, when optimally activated ex vivo, function as a potent cellular cancer therapeutic platform [ 69 ]. These engineered macrophages are capable of eliciting systemic immune responses, infiltrating tumors effectively, and exerting direct anti-tumor effects [ 69 ]. Their unique ability to coordinate multi-armed anti-tumor immune attacks involves the participation of diverse lymphocyte populations, including CD8 + T cells, NK cells, and CD4 + T cells, thereby inducing a “hot” tumor transition [ 70 – 72 ]. Macrophages’ natural function as antigen-presenting cells and their inherent tumor-homing capability make them particularly attractive candidates for adoptive transfer therapies [ 69 ]. Ex vivo activation cocktails, typically comprising interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), polyinosinic: polycytidylic acid, and anti-CD40 antibody, can significantly enhance their therapeutic potency prior to administration [ 70 ].

CD47 blockade and its impact on macrophage-mediated phagocytosis

CD47, a cell surface protein ubiquitously expressed on both healthy and malignant cells, plays a crucial role in immune evasion by interacting with signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) on myeloid cells. This interaction transmits a “don’t eat me” signal, effectively preventing cancer cells from immune detection and phagocytosis by macrophages [ 73 ]. CD47 blockade, a therapeutic strategy that disrupts this inhibitory signal, enables phagocytic immune cells like macrophages to recognize and eliminate cancer cells [ 73 , 74 ]. Preclinical studies have consistently demonstrated that CD47 blockade significantly enhances the phagocytosis of cancer cells by macrophages and promotes broader anti-tumor immune responses [ 73 ].

The CD47-SIRPα axis represents a fundamental immune checkpoint that cancer cells exploit to evade phagocytic clearance. Blocking this interaction directly causes the restoration of macrophage phagocytic activity, implying that CD47 blockade could serve as a potent sensitizer for other immunotherapies or even conventional treatments by removing a key “brake” on innate immune cell function [ 75 ]. However, this interaction also plays a crucial physiological role in protecting normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and red blood cells (RBCs) from being phagocytosed by macrophages [ 76 ]. This implies a critical challenge: therapies targeting CD47 must carefully navigate potential on-target, off-tumor toxicities, necessitating meticulous dose optimization or the development of more specific targeting strategies to spare healthy cells while effectively eliminating malignant ones [ 77 ].

Emergence of CAR-macrophages (CAR-M) and their distinct mechanisms

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-engineered macrophages (CAR-M) represent a promising and innovative approach to enhance cancer recognition and overcome some of the limitations observed with CAR-T cells, particularly in the context of solid tumors [ 64 ]. CAR-M cells offer distinct advantages, including enhanced infiltration and survival capabilities within the challenging TME, and a diverse array of anti-tumor mechanisms [ 64 ]. Beyond direct tumor cell elimination, CAR-M cells are capable of reprogramming macrophages towards an M1 phenotype, thereby contributing to a more immunostimulatory TME [ 64 , 78 ].

First-generation CAR-M constructs typically comprise an extracellular single-chain variable fragment (scFv) for specific tumor antigen recognition (e.g., CD19, HER2) and an intracellular signaling domain (e.g., CD3ζ, FcγR) [ 79 ]. Second-generation CAR-M designs aim to further improve antigen presentation and T cell activation by incorporating additional intracellular cytoplasmic domains [ 79 ]. An anti-HER2 CAR-M (CT-0508) has successfully entered a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial for patients with recurrent or metastatic HER-2 overexpressing solid tumors, demonstrating encouraging early results and receiving fast track designation from the FDA [ 79 , 80 ].Despite these advancements, challenges persist, including the limited in vivo expansion and persistence of CAR-M cells, the potential for off-target toxicity due to the expression of targeted tumor-associated antigens on healthy cells, and the possibility of immunogenicity arising from non-self components of the CAR construct or gene-transfer vectors [ 79 , 81 ].

Dendritic cell-based immunotherapies for blood cancers

Dendritic cells as professional antigen-presenting cells and their link to adaptive immunity

Dendritic cells (DCs) are recognized as key sentinels and professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that critically bridge the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system [ 82 ]. They are indispensable for initiating and sustaining effective T-cell-mediated anti-tumor immune responses, while also playing a vital role in maintaining immune tolerance [ 82 ]. DCs possess a unique ability to interpret diverse environmental stimuli, efficiently capture, process, and present both self and non-self antigens to T cells, thereby priming highly specific antigen-driven immune responses [ 82 , 83 ].

DCs constitute a heterogeneous population of immune cells, encompassing various subsets such as conventional DCs (cDCs, including cDC1s and cDC2s), plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), and monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs), each endowed with specialized functions [ 84 ]. For instance, cDC1s are particularly adept at cross-presenting tumor-associated antigens to CD8 + T lymphocytes, a function critical for robust anti-tumor immunity [ 84 ]. Plasmacytoid DCs are prominent producers of type I interferons and can exhibit both anti-tumor and, paradoxically, tumor-promoting roles [ 83 , 84 ]. The pivotal role of DCs in bridging innate and adaptive immunity implies that their proper function is causally necessary for a robust, sustained anti-tumor adaptive immune response. If DCs become dysfunctional, for example, due to suppression within the tumor microenvironment [ 84 ], the entire adaptive immune response against cancer is profoundly compromised. This highlights that DC-based therapies are not merely about activating T cells, but about restoring a fundamental immunological pathway often subverted in cancer, making them critical for the conversion of “cold” tumors into “hot” ones [ 85 ].

Dendritic cell vaccine approaches for hematological malignancies

Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccination represents an established approach for harnessing a patient’s own immune system to eliminate tumor cells [ 86 ]. The primary objective of DC vaccines is to induce tumor-specific effector T cells capable of reducing tumor mass and, crucially, to establish immunological memory to prevent disease relapse [ 87 ]. DCs are often referred to as “nature’s adjuvants” due to their superior capacity for antigen acquisition, processing, and presentation, coupled with their high expression of co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory molecules that dictate immune activation or anergy [ 86 , 88 ].

In the context of hematological malignancies, DC vaccines have undergone evaluation in numerous preclinical and early clinical trials, yielding promising results that demonstrate their potential to elicit specific cytotoxic immune responses against residual cancer cells [ 89 ]. Various methodologies involve priming autologous DCs ex vivo with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and co-stimulatory molecules before re-infusion into the patient [ 89 ].

Strategies to improve dendritic cell antigen presentation and activation

An effective DC vaccine must possess and maintain several critical characteristics: it must efficiently migrate to lymph nodes, exhibit a mature, Th1-polarizing phenotype that is stably expressed after infusion, and present antigen for a sufficient duration to elicit a robust T-cell response capable of eliminating a tumor [ 90 , 91 ]. Strategies aimed at enhancing antigen delivery into DCs are paramount for improving overall vaccination efficacy [ 92 ]. Antigen sources can vary, including peptides (which are fast and simple but often HLA-restricted), tumor lysates, or whole tumor cells [ 90 ]. The use of overlapping peptide libraries that cover entire tumor antigens can overcome issues of HLA restriction and epitope escape, thereby broadening the T-cell repertoire [ 90 ].

Genetic modification, such as through vector-transduced or transfected DCs, can ensure more stable and long-term antigen presentation compared to simply pulsing DCs with peptides [ 90 ]. For effective T-cell activation, DCs require three crucial “signals”: antigen presented as peptide epitopes on MHC molecules; membrane-bound co-stimulatory molecules like CD80 and CD86; and soluble co-stimulatory molecules, particularly the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12 [ 90 ].Furthermore, in vivo targeting of DCs offers a promising avenue to simplify vaccine production by generating antigen-specific DCs under more physiological conditions, circumventing the need for ex vivo cell isolation and manipulation [ 90 ] (Fig. 2 ). Fig. 2 Schematic overview of dendritic cell (DC) biology and therapeutic applications. Left panel: DCs as professional antigen-presenting cells capture and process antigens, presenting them to T cells via MHC molecules and delivering co-stimulatory signals, thereby bridging innate and adaptive immunity. Middle panel: DC vaccine approach for hematological malignancies—patient-derived DCs are primed ex vivo with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and co-stimulatory molecules, then re-infused to stimulate tumor-specific T cell responses. Right panel: Strategies to enhance DC antigen presentation and activation—antigen loading, upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86) and cytokines (IL-12), and in vivo targeting to optimize migration, T cell activation, and durable anti-tumor immunity

Fig. 2 Schematic overview of dendritic cell (DC) biology and therapeutic applications. Left panel: DCs as professional antigen-presenting cells capture and process antigens, prese…
Fig. 2 Schematic overview of dendritic cell (DC) biology and therapeutic applications. Left panel: DCs as professional antigen-presenting cells capture and process antigens, presenting them to T cells via MHC molecules and delivering co-stimulatory signals, thereby bridging innate and adaptive immunity. Middle panel: DC vaccine approach for hematological malignancies—patient-derived DCs are primed ex vivo with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and co-stimulatory molecules, then re-infused to stimulate tumor-specific T cell responses. Right panel: Strategies to enhance DC antigen presentation and activation—antigen loading, upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86) and cytokines (IL-12), and in vivo targeting to optimize migration, T cell activation, and durable anti-tumor immunity

Limitations of current DC vaccine strategies and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

Despite their considerable potential, DC-based vaccines have encountered several barriers that have limited their effectiveness in clinical trials [ 89 ]. Major limitations include the variable activation state of the DCs, the inherent challenge of ensuring stable maturation and efficient migration to lymph nodes in vivo, and the difficulty in directly assessing antigen-specific T-cell sensitization post-vaccination [ 87 , 89 ].

The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) represents a significant impediment, profoundly hindering DC function by altering their phenotype and promoting dysfunction or tolerogenicity [ 84 ]. This is particularly evident in “cold” tumors, where immunostimulatory cells are downregulated [ 93 , 94 ]. The TME’s ability to induce DC dysfunction and tolerogenicity directly causes a failure to launch effective anti-tumor T-cell responses, even in the presence of tumor antigens. These results indicates that DC vaccine efficacy is intrinsically linked to the TME’s immune status. Therefore, successful DC-based therapies, especially in advanced or “cold” tumors, will likely require pre-conditioning or concomitant strategies to neutralize TME-mediated immunosuppression and ensure DCs mature into an immunostimulatory phenotype rather than a tolerogenic one. DCs can, in certain contexts, inadvertently induce immune tolerance (e.g., through T-cell deletion or the expansion of regulatory T cells) rather than potent anti-tumor activity, which can severely limit vaccine success [ 89 ]. Tumor progression and existing immune dysfunction in advanced disease stages may also render DC-based vaccines more efficacious when applied in earlier disease stages [ 89 , 95 ]. Traditional DC vaccines often struggle with limited therapeutic efficacies and immune-related side effects, underscoring the pressing need for new generations of DC vaccine platforms [ 93 ].

Next-Generation DC vaccine platforms

To address the limitations of current DC vaccine strategies, new generations of DC vaccines are being developed. These include biomaterial-based vaccines, approaches that induce immunogenic cell death, mRNA-pulsed DCs, and DC small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-based vaccines, as well as tumor sEV-based DC vaccines [ 93 ]. These advanced platforms aim to target a broader spectrum of intracellular antigens, effectively prime naive tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells (a capability that distinguishes them from immune checkpoint blockades), and generate long-lived memory CD8 + T cells to prevent tumor relapse [ 93 , 96 ].

Synergistic approaches and overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

Cross-talk between innate immune cells and adaptive immunity

Innate immune cells are not merely direct effectors; they play a crucial role in shaping the cytokine and chemokine milieu of the tumor microenvironment (TME), thereby significantly influencing dendritic cell (DC) activation and the differentiation of effector T cells [ 22 ]. Productive cross-talk between innate cells and T cells can substantially bolster T cell function and proliferation, as exemplified by neutrophil-T cell interactions [ 22 , 97 ]. Furthermore, intratumoral innate leukocytes can engage in beneficial cross-talk with other innate cells; for instance, activated eosinophils have been shown to promote the M1 polarization of intratumoral macrophages, shifting them towards an anti-tumor phenotype [ 22 ]. A particularly important interaction is the NK-DC cross-talk, which, often mediated by FcγRIIIa on NK cells, can enhance DC maturation and the subsequent priming of anti-tumor CD8 + T cells [ 22 , 98 ]. The multifaceted roles of innate cells, encompassing direct cytotoxicity, TME modulation, and bridging to adaptive immunity, indicate that combining therapies targeting different innate cell functions could lead to synergistic effects. This suggests a causal chain where direct killing, coupled with TME modulation and adaptive priming, results in an enhanced and more durable anti-tumor response. This also implies that innate cell therapies are not just alternatives but essential partners for adaptive immunotherapies [ 99 ].

Combination strategies involving NK cells, macrophages, and DCs with conventional therapies or checkpoint inhibitors

Novel therapeutic strategies are increasingly focusing on targeting innate immunity to enhance anti-tumor responses. These include the therapeutic stimulation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and the DNA sensing cGAS/STING pathway [ 22 ]. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can effectively recruit innate effector cells, including NK cells, neutrophils, and other myeloid cells, to kill tumor cells through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [ 22 ]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-CTLA-4, anti-GITR, anti-OX40) may exert their anti-tumor activity by selectively depleting regulatory T cells (Tregs) via ADCC and/or antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), mediated by FcγR-expressing macrophages and other innate immune effectors [ 22 , 23 ].

Conventional chemotherapy, while primarily cytotoxic, can paradoxically enhance anti-tumor immunity by inducing immunogenic cell death, which releases tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [ 48 , 100 ]. It also promotes DC maturation, improves CD8 + T cell activation, and increases NK cell infiltration and activity [ 48 ]. However, chemotherapy can also promote pro-tumor inflammation and M2 macrophage polarization within the TME [ 48 , 101 ]. This presents a significant paradox: chemotherapy, while beneficial for some immune aspects, simultaneously causes detrimental effects like pro-tumor inflammation and M2 polarization. This contradiction implies that combining chemotherapy with innate immune cell therapies requires careful consideration and strategic timing. It suggests that therapies aimed at repolarizing M2 macrophages or dampening TME inflammation might be crucial adjuncts to chemotherapy, transforming its dual nature into a more consistently pro-immunogenic effect [ 102 ] (Fig. 3 ). Fig. 3 Schematic representation of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing anti-tumor immunity by engaging innate immune mechanisms. PRR stimulation via TLRs and the cGAS/STING pathway promotes innate immune activation against tumor cells. Therapeutic antibodies recruit NK cells and other innate effectors to mediate ADCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-CTLA-4, anti-GITR, anti-OX40) can deplete Tregs through ADCC/ADCP, enhancing anti-tumor immunity. Chemotherapy induces immunogenic cell death, leading to DC maturation, CD8⁺ T cell activation, and NK cell infiltration, while also potentially causing pro-tumor inflammation and M2 macrophage polarization, highlighting the need for combination approaches to counteract these adverse effects

Fig. 3 Schematic representation of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing anti-tumor immunity by engaging innate immune mechanisms. PRR stimulation via TLRs and the cGAS/…
Fig. 3 Schematic representation of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing anti-tumor immunity by engaging innate immune mechanisms. PRR stimulation via TLRs and the cGAS/STING pathway promotes innate immune activation against tumor cells. Therapeutic antibodies recruit NK cells and other innate effectors to mediate ADCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-CTLA-4, anti-GITR, anti-OX40) can deplete Tregs through ADCC/ADCP, enhancing anti-tumor immunity. Chemotherapy induces immunogenic cell death, leading to DC maturation, CD8⁺ T cell activation, and NK cell infiltration, while also potentially causing pro-tumor inflammation and M2 macrophage polarization, highlighting the need for combination approaches to counteract these adverse effects

Targeting the tumor microenvironment to enhance innate immune cell function

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a critical determinant of therapeutic efficacy, often characterized by profound immunosuppression and the downregulation of immunostimulatory cells [ 93 ]. Strategies aimed at overcoming TME limitations are therefore essential for enhancing both the numbers and functions of effector T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [ 93 , 103 ]. Repolarizing tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from an M2 (pro-tumorigenic) to an M1 (anti-tumorigenic) phenotype is a key TME-modulating strategy [ 58 ]. CD47 blockade directly disrupts a pivotal TME-mediated immune evasion mechanism, thereby unleashing phagocytic cells [ 73 , 104 ]. The overarching goal of these strategies is to convert immunologically “cold” tumors, which are unresponsive to many immunotherapies, into “hot” tumors, characterized by robust immune cell infiltration and activity [ 70 , 105 ].

To provide a comprehensive overview of the current translational landscape and the challenges being addressed, the following tables (Tables 1 and 2 ) summarize key clinical trials and the strategies employed to enhance innate immune cell therapies. Table 1 Clinical trials of innate immune cell therapies in blood cancers Cell Type Therapy Type Target Malignancy Phase of Trial Key Findings (Efficacy/Safety Highlights) Relevant Citations NK Cell Adoptive Transfer Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Phase 1 Feasible, safe (“off-the-shelf” aNK), no dose-limiting toxicities or grade 3–4 toxicities, transient activity in some patients. [ 31 ] NK Cell Adoptive Transfer Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Various Varying efficacy (transient activity to sustained remission), favorable safety (minimal CRS/GVHD), limited persistence. [ 27 ] NK Cell CAR-NK Cells B cell malignancies Early Clinical Promising efficacy, response rates comparable to CAR-T cells, lower rates of severe adverse effects (CRS). [ 30 ] Macrophage CAR-M (CT-0508) HER-2 overexpressing solid tumors (not blood cancer, but relevant for CAR-M development) Phase 1 Encouraging results, fast track designation. [ 79 ] Dendritic Cell DC Vaccine Hematological Malignancies Preclinical/Early Clinical Promising results, potential for specific cytotoxic immune response against residual cancer cells. [ 89 ] Table 2 Challenges and strategies to enhance innate immune cell therapies Challenge Relevant Cell Type(s) Proposed Strategy Mechanism of Action Relevant Citations Limited Cell Persistence NK, Macrophage, DC Cytokine treatment (IL-15, IL-2), Feeder cell lines, Genetic engineering (CAR-NK, CAR-M) Promotes expansion, survival, and sustained anti-tumor function. [ 45 Poor Homing/Infiltration NK, Macrophage Genetic engineering (e.g., chemokine receptor expression), Chemotherapy pre-treatment Enhances migration to tumor sites, modulates TME for better infiltration. [ 45 ] Immunosuppressive TME NK, Macrophage, DC TME modulation (e.g., repolarizing TAMs), CD47 blockade, Combination with checkpoint inhibitors Neutralizes suppressive factors, enhances phagocytosis, re-educates immune cells. [ 41 ] On-target/Off-tumor Toxicity CAR-NK, CAR-M, CD47 blockade Refined CAR design, Specific antigen selection, Careful dose optimization Minimizes recognition of healthy cells, balances efficacy with safety. [ 38 ] Functional Exhaustion NK, Macrophage, DC TME modulation, Combination therapies, Advanced engineering Counters TME-induced suppression, restores cytotoxic and proliferative capacity. [ 45 ] Antigen Escape (for CAR-based) CAR-NK, CAR-M Retained CAR-independent cytotoxicity (NK), Multi-antigen targeting Maintains anti-tumor activity even if CAR target is lost. [ 30 ]

Table 1
Clinical trials of innate immune cell therapies in blood cancers

Cell TypeTherapy TypeTarget MalignancyPhase of TrialKey Findings (Efficacy/Safety Highlights)Relevant Citations
NK CellAdoptive TransferAcute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)Phase 1Feasible, safe (“off-the-shelf” aNK), no dose-limiting toxicities or grade 3–4 toxicities, transient activity in some patients.[ 31 ]
NK CellAdoptive TransferAcute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)VariousVarying efficacy (transient activity to sustained remission), favorable safety (minimal CRS/GVHD), limited persistence.[ 27 ]
NK CellCAR-NK CellsB cell malignanciesEarly ClinicalPromising efficacy, response rates comparable to CAR-T cells, lower rates of severe adverse effects (CRS).[ 30 ]
MacrophageCAR-M (CT-0508)HER-2 overexpressing solid tumors (not blood cancer, but relevant for CAR-M development)Phase 1Encouraging results, fast track designation.[ 79 ]
Dendritic CellDC VaccineHematological MalignanciesPreclinical/Early ClinicalPromising results, potential for specific cytotoxic immune response against residual cancer cells.[ 89 ]

Table 2
Challenges and strategies to enhance innate immune cell therapies

ChallengeRelevant Cell Type(s)Proposed StrategyMechanism of ActionRelevant Citations
Limited Cell PersistenceNK, Macrophage, DCCytokine treatment (IL-15, IL-2), Feeder cell lines, Genetic engineering (CAR-NK, CAR-M)Promotes expansion, survival, and sustained anti-tumor function.[ 45
Poor Homing/InfiltrationNK, MacrophageGenetic engineering (e.g., chemokine receptor expression), Chemotherapy pre-treatmentEnhances migration to tumor sites, modulates TME for better infiltration.[ 45 ]
Immunosuppressive TMENK, Macrophage, DCTME modulation (e.g., repolarizing TAMs), CD47 blockade, Combination with checkpoint inhibitorsNeutralizes suppressive factors, enhances phagocytosis, re-educates immune cells.[ 41 ]
On-target/Off-tumor ToxicityCAR-NK, CAR-M, CD47 blockadeRefined CAR design, Specific antigen selection, Careful dose optimizationMinimizes recognition of healthy cells, balances efficacy with safety.[ 38 ]
Functional ExhaustionNK, Macrophage, DCTME modulation, Combination therapies, Advanced engineeringCounters TME-induced suppression, restores cytotoxic and proliferative capacity.[ 45 ]
Antigen Escape (for CAR-based)CAR-NK, CAR-MRetained CAR-independent cytotoxicity (NK), Multi-antigen targetingMaintains anti-tumor activity even if CAR target is lost.[ 30 ]

Conclusion and future perspectives

Recent advances in immunotherapy have expanded the focus beyond adaptive immune cells to include innate immune effectors as clinically relevant therapeutic agents in hematological malignancies. NK cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells contribute to anti-tumor immunity through distinct yet interconnected mechanisms, including direct cytotoxicity, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and initiation of adaptive immune responses. Harnessing these properties has led to the development of adoptive NK cell therapies, CAR-engineered innate immune cells, and dendritic cell–based vaccines.

Despite these remarkable advancements, the path to widespread clinical success is fraught with persistent challenges. Limited in vivo persistence and suboptimal homing to tumor sites remain critical hurdles for all three cell types. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, characterized by metabolic barriers and suppressive cellular components, profoundly hinders the function of these innate immune effectors, often leading to their exhaustion or tolerogenic reprogramming. Furthermore, the potential for on-target, off-tumor toxicities, as exemplified by CD47 blockade’s impact on healthy hematopoietic cells, necessitates meticulous therapeutic design.

The future of innate immunity-based immunotherapies for blood cancers lies in a multi-pronged, synergistic approach. Continued research must focus on:

Enhanced Cell Persistence and Homing : Developing sophisticated strategies to overcome the limitations of in vivo longevity and targeted tumor infiltration for NK cells, macrophages, and DCs. This includes optimizing cell expansion protocols and engineering cells with improved trafficking capabilities. Precision TME Modulation : Designing therapies that specifically neutralize immunosuppressive factors and cells within the TME while simultaneously promoting pro-immunogenic signals. This involves understanding the intricate interplay of cytokines, metabolites, and cellular components that dictate the TME’s immune status. Multi-modal and Personalized Approaches : Exploring rational combinations of innate cell therapies with conventional treatments (e.g., chemotherapy), immune checkpoint inhibitors, or other immunotherapies. Such approaches must be meticulously tailored to individual patient and tumor characteristics, moving towards precision medicine. Advanced Engineering : Leveraging cutting-edge technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, synthetic biology, and nanotechnology to create “smart” immune cells. These next-generation cells could possess enhanced anti-tumor functions, inherent resistance to TME-induced suppression, and improved safety profiles, potentially even secreting TME-modulating factors. Biomarker Discovery : Identifying robust predictive biomarkers for patient response to innate immune cell therapies is paramount. Such biomarkers will guide treatment selection, enable early identification of non-responders, and optimize therapeutic outcomes. Addressing Relapse Mechanisms : A deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying tumor relapse post-therapy, including antigen escape and the re-education of the TME, is crucial for designing durable therapeutic strategies.

The ultimate goal is to translate these scientific breakthroughs into safe, durable, and widely accessible therapeutic options that offer sustained remission and improved quality of life for patients battling hematological malignancies. The concerted efforts across fundamental biology, translational research, and clinical trials will be indispensable in realizing the full therapeutic potential of harnessing innate immunity.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author contributions

Ghaleb Oriquat, Waleed K. Abdulsahib, Sajida Hussein Ismael, R. Roopashree, Pradeepta Sekhar Patro, Jayshree Nellore, Gunjan Mukherjee, Ashish Singh Chauhan, Saodat Musayeva contributed to the conception, design, and drafting of the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

1. Yu Y The function of NK cells in tumor metastasis and NK Cell-Based immunotherapy Cancers (Basel) 2023 15 8 2323 37190251 10.3390/cancers15082323 PMC10136863 Yu Y (2023) The function of NK cells in tumor metastasis and NK Cell-Based immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 15(8):2323 37190251 10.3390/cancers15082323 PMC10136863

2. Peterson EE Barry KC The natural Killer-Dendritic cell immune axis in Anti-Cancer immunity and immunotherapy Front Immunol 2020 11 621254 33613552 10.3389/fimmu.2020.621254 PMC7886798 Peterson EE, Barry KC (2020) The natural Killer-Dendritic cell immune axis in Anti-Cancer immunity and immunotherapy. Front Immunol 11:621254 33613552 10.3389/fimmu.2020.621254 PMC7886798

3. Zhang Y Zhang Z The history and advances in cancer immunotherapy: Understanding the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their therapeutic implications Cell Mol Immunol 2020 17 8 807 821 32612154 10.1038/s41423-020-0488-6 PMC7395159 Zhang Y, Zhang Z (2020) The history and advances in cancer immunotherapy: Understanding the characteristics of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and their therapeutic implications. Cell Mol Immunol 17(8):807–821 32612154 10.1038/s41423-020-0488-6 PMC7395159

4. Wang R Lan C Benlagha K Camara NOS Miller H Kubo M The interaction of innate immune and adaptive immune system MedComm 2024 2020 5 10 e714 10.1002/mco2.714 PMC11401974 39286776 Wang R, Lan C, Benlagha K, Camara NOS, Miller H, Kubo M et al (2020) The interaction of innate immune and adaptive immune system. MedComm 2024 5(10):e714 10.1002/mco2.714 PMC11401974 39286776

5. Yenyuwadee S Aliazis K Wang Q Christofides A Shah R Patsoukis N Immune cellular components and signaling pathways in the tumor microenvironment Semin Cancer Biol 2022 86 Pt 2 187 201 35985559 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.08.004 PMC10735089 Yenyuwadee S, Aliazis K, Wang Q, Christofides A, Shah R, Patsoukis N et al (2022) Immune cellular components and signaling pathways in the tumor microenvironment. Semin Cancer Biol 86(Pt 2):187–201 35985559 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.08.004 PMC10735089

6. Guillerey C NK cells in the tumor microenvironment Adv Exp Med Biol 2020 1273 69 90 33119876 10.1007/978-3-030-49270-0_4 Guillerey C (2020) NK cells in the tumor microenvironment. Adv Exp Med Biol 1273:69–90 33119876 10.1007/978-3-030-49270-0_4

7. Sayegh M Ma S Yu J Application of natural killer immunotherapy in blood cancers and solid tumors Curr Opin Oncol 2023 35 5 446 452 37551952 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000968 PMC10786322 Sayegh M, Ma S, Yu J (2023) Application of natural killer immunotherapy in blood cancers and solid tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 35(5):446–452 37551952 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000968 PMC10786322

8. Myers JA Miller JS Exploring the NK cell platform for cancer immunotherapy Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021 18 2 85 100 32934330 10.1038/s41571-020-0426-7 PMC8316981 Myers JA, Miller JS (2021) Exploring the NK cell platform for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18(2):85–100 32934330 10.1038/s41571-020-0426-7 PMC8316981

9. Malchiodi ZX Fitzgerald A Galvano E Weiner LM Identification of molecules mediating natural killer cell-pancreatic stellate cell interactions Cancer Res 2022 82 12Supplement 6169 Malchiodi ZX, Fitzgerald A, Galvano E, Weiner LM (2022) Identification of molecules mediating natural killer cell-pancreatic stellate cell interactions. Cancer Res 82(12Supplement):6169

10. Kaweme NM Zhou F Optimizing NK Cell-Based immunotherapy in myeloid leukemia: abrogating an immunosuppressive microenvironment Front Immunol 2021 12 683381 34220833 10.3389/fimmu.2021.683381 PMC8247591 Kaweme NM, Zhou F (2021) Optimizing NK Cell-Based immunotherapy in myeloid leukemia: abrogating an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Front Immunol 12:683381 34220833 10.3389/fimmu.2021.683381 PMC8247591

11. Liu E Marin D Banerjee P Macapinlac HA Thompson P Basar R Use of CAR-Transduced natural killer cells in CD19-Positive lymphoid tumors N Engl J Med 2020 382 6 545 553 32023374 10.1056/NEJMoa1910607 PMC7101242 Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P, Macapinlac HA, Thompson P, Basar R et al (2020) Use of CAR-Transduced natural killer cells in CD19-Positive lymphoid tumors. N Engl J Med 382(6):545–553 32023374 10.1056/NEJMoa1910607 PMC7101242

12. Mattiola I Immune circuits to shape natural killer cells in cancer Cancers (Basel) 2021 13 13 3225 34203391 10.3390/cancers13133225 PMC8267947 Mattiola I (2021) Immune circuits to shape natural killer cells in cancer. Cancers (Basel) 13(13):3225 34203391 10.3390/cancers13133225 PMC8267947

13. da Silva LHR da Catharino LCC Silva VJ Evangelista GCM Barbuto JAM The war is on: the immune system against Glioblastoma-How can NK cells drive this battle? Biomed 2022 10 2 400 10.3390/biomedicines10020400 PMC8962431 35203609 da Silva LHR, Catharino LCC, da Silva VJ, Evangelista GCM, Barbuto JAM (2022) The war is on: the immune system against Glioblastoma-How can NK cells drive this battle? Biomed 10(2):400 10.3390/biomedicines10020400 PMC8962431 35203609

14. Ham H Medlyn M Billadeau DD Locked and loaded: mechanisms regulating natural killer cell lytic granule biogenesis and release Front Immunol 2022 13 871106 35558071 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871106 PMC9088006 Ham H, Medlyn M, Billadeau DD (2022) Locked and loaded: mechanisms regulating natural killer cell lytic granule biogenesis and release. Front Immunol 13:871106 35558071 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871106 PMC9088006

15. Bozward AG Warricker F Oo YH Khakoo SI Natural killer cells and regulatory T cells cross talk in hepatocellular carcinoma: exploring therapeutic options for the next decade Front Immunol 2021 12 643310 33995362 10.3389/fimmu.2021.643310 PMC8120158 Bozward AG, Warricker F, Oo YH, Khakoo SI (2021) Natural killer cells and regulatory T cells cross talk in hepatocellular carcinoma: exploring therapeutic options for the next decade. Front Immunol 12:643310 33995362 10.3389/fimmu.2021.643310 PMC8120158

16. Cornel AM Mimpen IL Nierkens S MHC class I downregulation in cancer: underlying mechanisms and potential targets for cancer immunotherapy Cancers (Basel) 2020 12 7 1760 32630675 10.3390/cancers12071760 PMC7409324 Cornel AM, Mimpen IL, Nierkens S (2020) MHC class I downregulation in cancer: underlying mechanisms and potential targets for cancer immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 12(7):1760 32630675 10.3390/cancers12071760 PMC7409324

17. Paul S Lal G The molecular mechanism of natural killer cells function and its importance in cancer immunotherapy Front Immunol 2017 8 1124 28955340 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01124 PMC5601256 Paul S, Lal G (2017) The molecular mechanism of natural killer cells function and its importance in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol 8:1124 28955340 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01124 PMC5601256

18. Zhao H Wu L Yan G Chen Y Zhou M Wu Y Inflammation and tumor progression: signaling pathways and targeted intervention Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021 6 1 263 34248142 10.1038/s41392-021-00658-5 PMC8273155 Zhao H, Wu L, Yan G, Chen Y, Zhou M, Wu Y et al (2021) Inflammation and tumor progression: signaling pathways and targeted intervention. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6(1):263 34248142 10.1038/s41392-021-00658-5 PMC8273155

19. Sun JC Lopez-Verges S Kim CC DeRisi JL Lanier LL NK cells and immune memory J Immunol 2011 186 4 1891 1897 21289313 10.4049/jimmunol.1003035 PMC4410097 Sun JC, Lopez-Verges S, Kim CC, DeRisi JL, Lanier LL (2011) NK cells and immune memory. J Immunol 186(4):1891–1897 21289313 10.4049/jimmunol.1003035 PMC4410097

20. Terrazzano G Carbone E NK cells blur the frontier between innate and acquired immunity Front Immunol 2012 3 400 23293641 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00400 PMC3534153 Terrazzano G, Carbone E (2012) NK cells blur the frontier between innate and acquired immunity. Front Immunol 3:400 23293641 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00400 PMC3534153

21. Gonzalez-Rodriguez AP Villa-Álvarez M Sordo-Bahamonde C Lorenzo-Herrero S Gonzalez S NK cells in the treatment of hematological malignancies J Clin Med 2019 8 10 1557 31569769 10.3390/jcm8101557 PMC6832953 Gonzalez-Rodriguez AP, Villa-Álvarez M, Sordo-Bahamonde C, Lorenzo-Herrero S, Gonzalez S (2019) NK cells in the treatment of hematological malignancies. J Clin Med 8(10):1557 31569769 10.3390/jcm8101557 PMC6832953

22. Rameshbabu S Labadie BW Argulian A Patnaik A Targeting innate immunity in cancer therapy Vaccines (Basel) 2021 9 2 138 33572196 10.3390/vaccines9020138 PMC7916062 Rameshbabu S, Labadie BW, Argulian A, Patnaik A (2021) Targeting innate immunity in cancer therapy. Vaccines (Basel) 9(2):138 33572196 10.3390/vaccines9020138 PMC7916062

23. Lo Nigro C Macagno M Sangiolo D Bertolaccini L Aglietta M Merlano MC NK-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in solid tumors: biological evidence and clinical perspectives Ann Transl Med 2019 7 5 105 31019955 10.21037/atm.2019.01.42 PMC6462666 Lo Nigro C, Macagno M, Sangiolo D, Bertolaccini L, Aglietta M, Merlano MC (2019) NK-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in solid tumors: biological evidence and clinical perspectives. Ann Transl Med 7(5):105 31019955 10.21037/atm.2019.01.42 PMC6462666

24. Vogler M Shanmugalingam S Särchen V Reindl LM Grèze V Buchinger L Unleashing the power of NK cells in anticancer immunotherapy J Mol Med (Berl) 2022 100 3 337 349 34374809 10.1007/s00109-021-02120-z PMC8843917 Vogler M, Shanmugalingam S, Särchen V, Reindl LM, Grèze V, Buchinger L et al (2022) Unleashing the power of NK cells in anticancer immunotherapy. J Mol Med (Berl) 100(3):337–349 34374809 10.1007/s00109-021-02120-z PMC8843917

25. Leong JW Chase JM Romee R Schneider SE Sullivan RP Cooper MA Preactivation with IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 induces CD25 and a functional high-affinity IL-2 receptor on human cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 2014 20 4 463 473 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.01.006 PMC3959288 24434782 Leong JW, Chase JM, Romee R, Schneider SE, Sullivan RP, Cooper MA et al (2014) Preactivation with IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 induces CD25 and a functional high-affinity IL-2 receptor on human cytokine-induced memory-like natural killer cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 20(4):463–473 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.01.006 PMC3959288 24434782

26. Tarannum M Romee R Shapiro RM Innovative strategies to improve the clinical application of NK Cell-Based immunotherapy Front Immunol 2022 13 859177 35401529 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859177 PMC8990319 Tarannum M, Romee R, Shapiro RM (2022) Innovative strategies to improve the clinical application of NK Cell-Based immunotherapy. Front Immunol 13:859177 35401529 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859177 PMC8990319

27. Rady M Mostafa M Dida G Sabet F Abou-Aisha K Watzl C Adoptive NK cell therapy in AML: progress and challenges Clin Exp Med 2025 25 1 41 39820676 10.1007/s10238-025-01559-5 PMC11748472 Rady M, Mostafa M, Dida G, Sabet F, Abou-Aisha K, Watzl C (2025) Adoptive NK cell therapy in AML: progress and challenges. Clin Exp Med 25(1):41 39820676 10.1007/s10238-025-01559-5 PMC11748472

28. Golden RJ Fesnak AD Clinical development of natural killer cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors Transfus Apher Sci 2021 60 1 103065 33468407 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103065 PMC10029926 Golden RJ, Fesnak AD (2021) Clinical development of natural killer cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors. Transfus Apher Sci 60(1):103065 33468407 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103065 PMC10029926

29. Zhao X Cai L Hu Y Wang H Cord-Blood natural killer Cell-Based immunotherapy for cancer Front Immunol 2020 11 584099 33193399 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584099 PMC7642255 Zhao X, Cai L, Hu Y, Wang H (2020) Cord-Blood natural killer Cell-Based immunotherapy for cancer. Front Immunol 11:584099 33193399 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584099 PMC7642255

30. Jørgensen LV Christensen EB Barnkob MB Barington T The clinical landscape of CAR NK cells Exp Hematol Oncol 2025 14 1 46 40149002 10.1186/s40164-025-00633-8 PMC11951618 Jørgensen LV, Christensen EB, Barnkob MB, Barington T (2025) The clinical landscape of CAR NK cells. Exp Hematol Oncol 14(1):46 40149002 10.1186/s40164-025-00633-8 PMC11951618

31. Cerrano M Ruella M Perales MA Vitale C Faraci DG Giaccone L The advent of CAR T-Cell therapy for lymphoproliferative neoplasms: integrating research into clinical practice Front Immunol 2020 11 888 32477359 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00888 PMC7235422 Cerrano M, Ruella M, Perales MA, Vitale C, Faraci DG, Giaccone L et al (2020) The advent of CAR T-Cell therapy for lymphoproliferative neoplasms: integrating research into clinical practice. Front Immunol 11:888 32477359 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00888 PMC7235422

32. Heslop HE Stadtmauer EA Levine JE Ballen KK Chen YB DeZern AE Blood and marrow transplant clinical trials network state of the science symposium 2021: looking forward as the network celebrates its 20th Year Transplant Cell Ther 2021 27 11 885 907 34461278 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.08.016 PMC8556300 Heslop HE, Stadtmauer EA, Levine JE, Ballen KK, Chen YB, DeZern AE et al (2021) Blood and marrow transplant clinical trials network state of the science symposium 2021: looking forward as the network celebrates its 20th Year. Transplant Cell Ther 27(11):885–907 34461278 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.08.016 PMC8556300

33. Bashiri Dezfouli A Yazdi M Pockley AG Khosravi M Kobold S Wagner E NK cells armed with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR): roadblocks to successful development Cells 2021 10 12 3390 34943898 10.3390/cells10123390 PMC8699535 Bashiri Dezfouli A, Yazdi M, Pockley AG, Khosravi M, Kobold S, Wagner E et al (2021) NK cells armed with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR): roadblocks to successful development. Cells 10(12):3390 34943898 10.3390/cells10123390 PMC8699535

34. Peng L Sferruzza G Yang L Zhou L Chen S CAR-T and CAR-NK as cellular cancer immunotherapy for solid tumors Cell Mol Immunol 2024 21 10 1089 1108 39134804 10.1038/s41423-024-01207-0 PMC11442786 Peng L, Sferruzza G, Yang L, Zhou L, Chen S (2024) CAR-T and CAR-NK as cellular cancer immunotherapy for solid tumors. Cell Mol Immunol 21(10):1089–1108 39134804 10.1038/s41423-024-01207-0 PMC11442786

35. Kong Y Li J Zhao X Wu Y Chen L CAR-T cell therapy: developments, challenges and expanded applications from cancer to autoimmunity Front Immunol 2024 15 1519671 39850899 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1519671 PMC11754230 Kong Y, Li J, Zhao X, Wu Y, Chen L (2024) CAR-T cell therapy: developments, challenges and expanded applications from cancer to autoimmunity. Front Immunol 15:1519671 39850899 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1519671 PMC11754230

36. Joshi DC Sharma A Prasad S Singh K Kumar M Sherawat K Novel therapeutic agents in clinical trials: emerging approaches in cancer therapy Discov Oncol 2024 15 1 342 39127974 10.1007/s12672-024-01195-7 PMC11317456 Joshi DC, Sharma A, Prasad S, Singh K, Kumar M, Sherawat K et al (2024) Novel therapeutic agents in clinical trials: emerging approaches in cancer therapy. Discov Oncol 15(1):342 39127974 10.1007/s12672-024-01195-7 PMC11317456

37. Kotsafti A Scarpa M Castagliuolo I Scarpa M Reactive oxygen species and antitumor immunity-from surveillance to evasion Cancers (Basel) 2020 12 7 1748 32630174 10.3390/cancers12071748 PMC7409327 Kotsafti A, Scarpa M, Castagliuolo I, Scarpa M (2020) Reactive oxygen species and antitumor immunity-from surveillance to evasion. Cancers (Basel) 12(7):1748 32630174 10.3390/cancers12071748 PMC7409327

38. Huang R Wang X Yan H Tan X Ma Y Wang M Safety and efficacy of CD33-targeted CAR-NK cell therapy for relapsed/refractory AML: preclinical evaluation and phase I trial Exp Hematol Oncol 2025 14 1 1 39748428 10.1186/s40164-024-00592-6 PMC11694373 Huang R, Wang X, Yan H, Tan X, Ma Y, Wang M et al (2025) Safety and efficacy of CD33-targeted CAR-NK cell therapy for relapsed/refractory AML: preclinical evaluation and phase I trial. Exp Hematol Oncol 14(1):1 39748428 10.1186/s40164-024-00592-6 PMC11694373

39. Zhong Y Liu J Emerging roles of CAR-NK cell therapies in tumor immunotherapy: current status and future directions Cell Death Discov 2024 10 1 318 38987565 10.1038/s41420-024-02077-1 PMC11236993 Zhong Y, Liu J (2024) Emerging roles of CAR-NK cell therapies in tumor immunotherapy: current status and future directions. Cell Death Discov 10(1):318 38987565 10.1038/s41420-024-02077-1 PMC11236993

40. Gurney M O’Dwyer M Realizing innate potential: CAR-NK cell therapies for acute myeloid leukemia Cancers (Basel) 2021 13 7 1568 33805422 10.3390/cancers13071568 PMC8036691 Gurney M, O’Dwyer M (2021) Realizing innate potential: CAR-NK cell therapies for acute myeloid leukemia. Cancers (Basel) 13(7):1568 33805422 10.3390/cancers13071568 PMC8036691

41. Tong L Jiménez-Cortegana C Tay AHM Wickström S Galluzzi L Lundqvist A NK cells and solid tumors: therapeutic potential and persisting Obstacles Mol Cancer 2022 21 1 206 36319998 10.1186/s12943-022-01672-z PMC9623927 Tong L, Jiménez-Cortegana C, Tay AHM, Wickström S, Galluzzi L, Lundqvist A (2022) NK cells and solid tumors: therapeutic potential and persisting Obstacles. Mol Cancer 21(1):206 36319998 10.1186/s12943-022-01672-z PMC9623927

42. Raskov H Orhan A Gaggar S Gögenur I Cancer-Associated fibroblasts and Tumor-Associated macrophages in cancer and cancer immunotherapy Front Oncol 2021 11 668731 34094963 10.3389/fonc.2021.668731 PMC8172975 Raskov H, Orhan A, Gaggar S, Gögenur I (2021) Cancer-Associated fibroblasts and Tumor-Associated macrophages in cancer and cancer immunotherapy. Front Oncol 11:668731 34094963 10.3389/fonc.2021.668731 PMC8172975

43. Miao L Lu C Zhang B Li H Zhao X Chen H Advances in metabolic reprogramming of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment on the impact of NK therapy J Transl Med 2024 22 1 229 38433193 10.1186/s12967-024-05033-w PMC10909296 Miao L, Lu C, Zhang B, Li H, Zhao X, Chen H et al (2024) Advances in metabolic reprogramming of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment on the impact of NK therapy. J Transl Med 22(1):229 38433193 10.1186/s12967-024-05033-w PMC10909296

44. Liu S Zhang X Wang W Li X Sun X Zhao Y Metabolic reprogramming and therapeutic resistance in primary and metastatic breast cancer Mol Cancer 2024 23 1 261 39574178 10.1186/s12943-024-02165-x PMC11580516 Liu S, Zhang X, Wang W, Li X, Sun X, Zhao Y et al (2024) Metabolic reprogramming and therapeutic resistance in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Mol Cancer 23(1):261 39574178 10.1186/s12943-024-02165-x PMC11580516

45. Zhang L Zhao Y Dong Y Jiang X NK cell-based immunotherapy strategies for myeloid leukemia Front Immunol 2025 16 1621885 40726987 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1621885 PMC12301322 Zhang L, Zhao Y, Dong Y, Jiang X (2025) NK cell-based immunotherapy strategies for myeloid leukemia. Front Immunol 16:1621885 40726987 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1621885 PMC12301322

46. Ran GH Lin YQ Tian L Zhang T Yan DM Yu JH Natural killer cell homing and trafficking in tissues and tumors: from biology to application Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022 7 1 205 35768424 10.1038/s41392-022-01058-z PMC9243142 Ran GH, Lin YQ, Tian L, Zhang T, Yan DM, Yu JH et al (2022) Natural killer cell homing and trafficking in tissues and tumors: from biology to application. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7(1):205 35768424 10.1038/s41392-022-01058-z PMC9243142

47. Cho S Choi SH Maeng E Park H Ryu KS Park KS Boosting tumor homing of endogenous natural killer cells via therapeutic secretomes of chemically primed natural killer cells J Immunother Cancer 2025 13 3 010371 10.1136/jitc-2024-010371 PMC11883546 40044578 Cho S, Choi SH, Maeng E, Park H, Ryu KS, Park KS (2025) Boosting tumor homing of endogenous natural killer cells via therapeutic secretomes of chemically primed natural killer cells. J Immunother Cancer 13(3):010371 10.1136/jitc-2024-010371 PMC11883546 40044578

48. Guo JH Afzal A Ahmad S Saeed G Rehman A Saddozai UAK Novel strategies to overcome tumor immunotherapy resistance using CAR NK cells Front Immunol 2025 16 1550652 40510336 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550652 PMC12159078 Guo JH, Afzal A, Ahmad S, Saeed G, Rehman A, Saddozai UAK et al (2025) Novel strategies to overcome tumor immunotherapy resistance using CAR NK cells. Front Immunol 16:1550652 40510336 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550652 PMC12159078

49. Huang X Ren Q Yang L Cui D Ma C Zheng Y Immunogenic chemotherapy: great potential for improving response rates Front Oncol 2023 13 1308681 38125944 10.3389/fonc.2023.1308681 PMC10732354 Huang X, Ren Q, Yang L, Cui D, Ma C, Zheng Y et al (2023) Immunogenic chemotherapy: great potential for improving response rates. Front Oncol 13:1308681 38125944 10.3389/fonc.2023.1308681 PMC10732354

50. Masmoudi D Villalba M Alix-Panabières C Natural killer cells: the immune frontline against Circulating tumor cells J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2025 44 1 118 40211394 10.1186/s13046-025-03375-x PMC11983744 Masmoudi D, Villalba M, Alix-Panabières C (2025) Natural killer cells: the immune frontline against Circulating tumor cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 44(1):118 40211394 10.1186/s13046-025-03375-x PMC11983744

51. Bald T Krummel MF Smyth MJ Barry KC The NK cell-cancer cycle: advances and new challenges in NK cell-based immunotherapies Nat Immunol 2020 21 8 835 847 32690952 10.1038/s41590-020-0728-z PMC8406687 Bald T, Krummel MF, Smyth MJ, Barry KC (2020) The NK cell-cancer cycle: advances and new challenges in NK cell-based immunotherapies. Nat Immunol 21(8):835–847 32690952 10.1038/s41590-020-0728-z PMC8406687

52. Noy R Pollard JW Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy Immunity 2014 41 1 49 61 25035953 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010 PMC4137410 Noy R, Pollard JW (2014) Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy. Immunity 41(1):49–61 25035953 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010 PMC4137410

53. Huang R Kang T Chen S The role of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor immune evasion J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024 150 5 238 38713256 10.1007/s00432-024-05777-4 PMC11076352 Huang R, Kang T, Chen S (2024) The role of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor immune evasion. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 150(5):238 38713256 10.1007/s00432-024-05777-4 PMC11076352

54. Mantovani A Sica A Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity Curr Opin Immunol 2010 22 2 231 237 20144856 10.1016/j.coi.2010.01.009 Mantovani A, Sica A (2010) Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr Opin Immunol 22(2):231–237 20144856 10.1016/j.coi.2010.01.009

55. Hao NB Lü MH Fan YH Cao YL Zhang ZR Yang SM Macrophages in tumor microenvironments and the progression of tumors Clin Dev Immunol 2012 2012 948098 22778768 10.1155/2012/948098 PMC3385963 Hao NB, Lü MH, Fan YH, Cao YL, Zhang ZR, Yang SM (2012) Macrophages in tumor microenvironments and the progression of tumors. Clin Dev Immunol 2012:948098 22778768 10.1155/2012/948098 PMC3385963

56. Yang Q Guo N Zhou Y Chen J Wei Q Han M The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in tumor progression and relevant advance in targeted therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2020 10 11 2156 2170 33304783 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.04.004 PMC7714989 Yang Q, Guo N, Zhou Y, Chen J, Wei Q, Han M (2020) The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in tumor progression and relevant advance in targeted therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B 10(11):2156–2170 33304783 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.04.004 PMC7714989

57. Basak U Sarkar T Mukherjee S Chakraborty S Dutta A Dutta S Tumor-associated macrophages: an effective player of the tumor microenvironment Front Immunol 2023 14 1295257 38035101 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1295257 PMC10687432 Basak U, Sarkar T, Mukherjee S, Chakraborty S, Dutta A, Dutta S et al (2023) Tumor-associated macrophages: an effective player of the tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol 14:1295257 38035101 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1295257 PMC10687432

58. Chettri D Satapathy BP Yadav R Uttam V Jain A Prakash H CAR-macrophages: tailoring cancer immunotherapy Front Immunol 2024 15 1532833 39877364 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1532833 PMC11772431 Chettri D, Satapathy BP, Yadav R, Uttam V, Jain A, Prakash H (2024) CAR-macrophages: tailoring cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol 15:1532833 39877364 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1532833 PMC11772431

59. Qian Y Yin Y Zheng X Liu Z Wang X Metabolic regulation of tumor-associated macrophage heterogeneity: insights into the tumor microenvironment and immunotherapeutic opportunities Biomark Res 2024 12 1 1 38185636 10.1186/s40364-023-00549-7 PMC10773124 Qian Y, Yin Y, Zheng X, Liu Z, Wang X (2024) Metabolic regulation of tumor-associated macrophage heterogeneity: insights into the tumor microenvironment and immunotherapeutic opportunities. Biomark Res 12(1):1 38185636 10.1186/s40364-023-00549-7 PMC10773124

60. Hinshaw DC Hanna A Lama-Sherpa T Metge B Kammerud SC Benavides GA Hedgehog signaling regulates metabolism and polarization of mammary Tumor-Associated macrophages Cancer Res 2021 81 21 5425 5437 34289986 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1723 PMC8563376 Hinshaw DC, Hanna A, Lama-Sherpa T, Metge B, Kammerud SC, Benavides GA et al (2021) Hedgehog signaling regulates metabolism and polarization of mammary Tumor-Associated macrophages. Cancer Res 81(21):5425–5437 34289986 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1723 PMC8563376

61. Ghebremedhin A Athavale D Zhang Y Yao X Balch C Song S Tumor-Associated macrophages as major immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment Cancers (Basel) 2024 16 19 10.3390/cancers16193410 PMC11475569 39410029 Ghebremedhin A, Athavale D, Zhang Y, Yao X, Balch C, Song S (2024) Tumor-Associated macrophages as major immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 16:19 10.3390/cancers16193410 PMC11475569 39410029

62. Stout RD Suttles J Functional plasticity of macrophages: reversible adaptation to changing microenvironments J Leukoc Biol 2004 76 3 509 513 15218057 10.1189/jlb.0504272 PMC1201486 Stout RD, Suttles J (2004) Functional plasticity of macrophages: reversible adaptation to changing microenvironments. J Leukoc Biol 76(3):509–513 15218057 10.1189/jlb.0504272 PMC1201486

63. Ricketts TD Prieto-Dominguez N Gowda PS Ubil E Mechanisms of macrophage plasticity in the tumor environment: manipulating activation state to improve outcomes Front Immunol 2021 12 642285 34025653 10.3389/fimmu.2021.642285 PMC8139576 Ricketts TD, Prieto-Dominguez N, Gowda PS, Ubil E (2021) Mechanisms of macrophage plasticity in the tumor environment: manipulating activation state to improve outcomes. Front Immunol 12:642285 34025653 10.3389/fimmu.2021.642285 PMC8139576

64. Park KS Gottlieb AP Janes ME Prakash S Kapate N Suja VC Adoptively transferred macrophages for cancer immunotherapy J Immunother Cancer 2025 13 5 010437 10.1136/jitc-2024-010437 PMC12104917 40413021 Park KS, Gottlieb AP, Janes ME, Prakash S, Kapate N, Suja VC et al (2025) Adoptively transferred macrophages for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 13(5):010437 10.1136/jitc-2024-010437 PMC12104917 40413021

65. Reis-Sobreiro M Teixeira da Mota A Jardim C Serre K Bringing macrophages to the frontline against cancer: current immunotherapies targeting macrophages Cells 2021 10 9 2364 34572013 10.3390/cells10092364 PMC8464913 Reis-Sobreiro M, Teixeira da Mota A, Jardim C, Serre K (2021) Bringing macrophages to the frontline against cancer: current immunotherapies targeting macrophages. Cells 10(9):2364 34572013 10.3390/cells10092364 PMC8464913

66. Tan S Tang H Wang Y Xie P Li H Zhang Z Tumor cell-derived exosomes regulate macrophage polarization: emerging directions in the study of tumor genesis and development Heliyon 2023 9 9 e19296 37662730 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19296 PMC10474436 Tan S, Tang H, Wang Y, Xie P, Li H, Zhang Z et al (2023) Tumor cell-derived exosomes regulate macrophage polarization: emerging directions in the study of tumor genesis and development. Heliyon 9(9):e19296 37662730 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19296 PMC10474436

67. Wang S Wang J Chen Z Luo J Guo W Sun L Targeting M2-like tumor-associated macrophages is a potential therapeutic approach to overcome antitumor drug resistance NPJ Precis Oncol 2024 8 1 31 38341519 10.1038/s41698-024-00522-z PMC10858952 Wang S, Wang J, Chen Z, Luo J, Guo W, Sun L et al (2024) Targeting M2-like tumor-associated macrophages is a potential therapeutic approach to overcome antitumor drug resistance. NPJ Precis Oncol 8(1):31 38341519 10.1038/s41698-024-00522-z PMC10858952

68. Sabit H Pawlik TM Radwan F Abdel-Hakeem M Abdel-Ghany S Wadan AS Precision nanomedicine: navigating the tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer immunotherapy and targeted drug delivery Mol Cancer 2025 24 1 160 40457437 10.1186/s12943-025-02357-z PMC12131435 Sabit H, Pawlik TM, Radwan F, Abdel-Hakeem M, Abdel-Ghany S, Wadan AS et al (2025) Precision nanomedicine: navigating the tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer immunotherapy and targeted drug delivery. Mol Cancer 24(1):160 40457437 10.1186/s12943-025-02357-z PMC12131435

69. Gao J Liang Y Wang L Shaping polarization of Tumor-Associated macrophages in cancer immunotherapy Front Immunol 2022 13 888713 35844605 10.3389/fimmu.2022.888713 PMC9280632 Gao J, Liang Y, Wang L (2022) Shaping polarization of Tumor-Associated macrophages in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol 13:888713 35844605 10.3389/fimmu.2022.888713 PMC9280632

70. Chen Q Guo X Ma W Opportunities and challenges of CD47-targeted therapy in cancer immunotherapy Oncol Res 2023 32 1 49 60 38188674 10.32604/or.2023.042383 PMC10767231 Chen Q, Guo X, Ma W (2023) Opportunities and challenges of CD47-targeted therapy in cancer immunotherapy. Oncol Res 32(1):49–60 38188674 10.32604/or.2023.042383 PMC10767231

71. Yang S Wang Y Jia J Fang Y Yang Y Yuan W Advances in engineered macrophages: A new frontier in cancer immunotherapy Cell Death Dis 2024 15 4 238 38561367 10.1038/s41419-024-06616-7 PMC10985090 Yang S, Wang Y, Jia J, Fang Y, Yang Y, Yuan W et al (2024) Advances in engineered macrophages: A new frontier in cancer immunotherapy. Cell Death Dis 15(4):238 38561367 10.1038/s41419-024-06616-7 PMC10985090

72. Aizaz M Khan A Khan F Khan M Musad Saleh EA Nisar M The cross-talk between macrophages and tumor cells as a target for cancer treatment Front Oncol 2023 13 1259034 38033495 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259034 PMC10682792 Aizaz M, Khan A, Khan F, Khan M, Musad Saleh EA, Nisar M et al (2023) The cross-talk between macrophages and tumor cells as a target for cancer treatment. Front Oncol 13:1259034 38033495 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259034 PMC10682792

73. Liu Y Weng L Wang Y Zhang J Wu Q Zhao P Deciphering the role of CD47 in cancer immunotherapy J Adv Res 2024 63 129 158 39167629 10.1016/j.jare.2023.10.009 PMC11380025 Liu Y, Weng L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Wu Q, Zhao P et al (2024) Deciphering the role of CD47 in cancer immunotherapy. J Adv Res 63:129–158 39167629 10.1016/j.jare.2023.10.009 PMC11380025

74. Jiang C Sun H Jiang Z Tian W Cang S Yu J Targeting the CD47/SIRPα pathway in malignancies: recent progress, difficulties and future perspectives Front Oncol 2024 14 1378647 39040441 10.3389/fonc.2024.1378647 PMC11261161 Jiang C, Sun H, Jiang Z, Tian W, Cang S, Yu J (2024) Targeting the CD47/SIRPα pathway in malignancies: recent progress, difficulties and future perspectives. Front Oncol 14:1378647 39040441 10.3389/fonc.2024.1378647 PMC11261161

75. Logtenberg MEW Scheeren FA Schumacher TN The CD47-SIRPα immune checkpoint Immunity 2020 52 5 742 752 32433947 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.011 PMC7340539 Logtenberg MEW, Scheeren FA, Schumacher TN (2020) The CD47-SIRPα immune checkpoint. Immunity 52(5):742–752 32433947 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.011 PMC7340539

76. Wang S Yang Y Ma P Zha Y Zhang J Lei A CAR-macrophage: an extensive immune enhancer to fight cancer EBioMedicine 2022 76 103873 35152151 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103873 PMC8844597 Wang S, Yang Y, Ma P, Zha Y, Zhang J, Lei A et al (2022) CAR-macrophage: an extensive immune enhancer to fight cancer. EBioMedicine 76:103873 35152151 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103873 PMC8844597

77. Guan F Wang R Yi Z Luo P Liu W Xie Y Tissue macrophages: origin, heterogenity, biological functions, diseases and therapeutic targets Signal Transduct Target Ther 2025 10 1 93 40055311 10.1038/s41392-025-02124-y PMC11889221 Guan F, Wang R, Yi Z, Luo P, Liu W, Xie Y et al (2025) Tissue macrophages: origin, heterogenity, biological functions, diseases and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther 10(1):93 40055311 10.1038/s41392-025-02124-y PMC11889221

78. Morva A Arroyo AB Andreeva L Tapia-Abellán A Luengo-Gil G Unleashing the power of CAR-M therapy in solid tumors: a comprehensive review Front Immunol 2025 16 1615760 40574837 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1615760 PMC12198237 Morva A, Arroyo AB, Andreeva L, Tapia-Abellán A, Luengo-Gil G (2025) Unleashing the power of CAR-M therapy in solid tumors: a comprehensive review. Front Immunol 16:1615760 40574837 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1615760 PMC12198237

79. Shi Y Li X Dong Y Yuan H Wang Y Yang R Exploring the potential of CAR-macrophage therapy Life Sci 2025 361 123300 39643037 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123300 Shi Y, Li X, Dong Y, Yuan H, Wang Y, Yang R (2025) Exploring the potential of CAR-macrophage therapy. Life Sci 361:123300 39643037 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123300

80. Reiss KA Angelos MG Dees EC Yuan Y Ueno NT Pohlmann PR CAR-macrophage therapy for HER2-overexpressing advanced solid tumors: a phase 1 trial Nat Med 2025 31 4 1171 1182 39920391 10.1038/s41591-025-03495-z Reiss KA, Angelos MG, Dees EC, Yuan Y, Ueno NT, Pohlmann PR et al (2025) CAR-macrophage therapy for HER2-overexpressing advanced solid tumors: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med 31(4):1171–1182 39920391 10.1038/s41591-025-03495-z

81. Saeidpour Masouleh S Nasiri K Ostovar Ravari A Saligheh Rad M Kiani K Sharifi Sultani A Advances and challenges in CAR-T cell therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Biomark Res 2025 13 1 69 40312353 10.1186/s40364-025-00783-1 PMC12044960 Saeidpour Masouleh S, Nasiri K, Ostovar Ravari A, Saligheh Rad M, Kiani K, Sharifi Sultani A et al (2025) Advances and challenges in CAR-T cell therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Biomark Res 13(1):69 40312353 10.1186/s40364-025-00783-1 PMC12044960

82. Marciscano AE Anandasabapathy N The role of dendritic cells in cancer and anti-tumor immunity Semin Immunol 2021 52 101481 34023170 10.1016/j.smim.2021.101481 PMC8545750 Marciscano AE, Anandasabapathy N (2021) The role of dendritic cells in cancer and anti-tumor immunity. Semin Immunol 52:101481 34023170 10.1016/j.smim.2021.101481 PMC8545750

83. Boscardin SB Dudziak D Münz C Rosa DS Editorial: Harnessing the participation of dendritic cells in immunity and tolerance Front Immunol 2020 11 595841 33117409 10.3389/fimmu.2020.595841 PMC7575758 Boscardin SB, Dudziak D, Münz C, Rosa DS (2020) Editorial: Harnessing the participation of dendritic cells in immunity and tolerance. Front Immunol 11:595841 33117409 10.3389/fimmu.2020.595841 PMC7575758

84. Del Prete A Salvi V Soriani A Laffranchi M Sozio F Bosisio D Dendritic cell subsets in cancer immunity and tumor antigen sensing Cell Mol Immunol 2023 20 5 432 447 36949244 10.1038/s41423-023-00990-6 PMC10203372 Del Prete A, Salvi V, Soriani A, Laffranchi M, Sozio F, Bosisio D et al (2023) Dendritic cell subsets in cancer immunity and tumor antigen sensing. Cell Mol Immunol 20(5):432–447 36949244 10.1038/s41423-023-00990-6 PMC10203372

85. Chang RB Beatty GL The interplay between innate and adaptive immunity in cancer shapes the productivity of cancer immunosurveillance J Leukoc Biol 2020 108 1 363 376 32272502 10.1002/JLB.3MIR0320-475R PMC7377219 Chang RB, Beatty GL (2020) The interplay between innate and adaptive immunity in cancer shapes the productivity of cancer immunosurveillance. J Leukoc Biol 108(1):363–376 32272502 10.1002/JLB.3MIR0320-475R PMC7377219

86. Palucka K Banchereau J Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells Nat Rev Cancer 2012 12 4 265 277 22437871 10.1038/nrc3258 PMC3433802 Palucka K, Banchereau J (2012) Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells. Nat Rev Cancer 12(4):265–277 22437871 10.1038/nrc3258 PMC3433802

87. Cintolo JA Datta J Mathew SJ Czerniecki BJ Dendritic cell-based vaccines: barriers and opportunities Future Oncol 2012 8 10 1273 1299 23130928 10.2217/fon.12.125 PMC4260651 Cintolo JA, Datta J, Mathew SJ, Czerniecki BJ (2012) Dendritic cell-based vaccines: barriers and opportunities. Future Oncol 8(10):1273–1299 23130928 10.2217/fon.12.125 PMC4260651

88. Santos PM Butterfield LH Dendritic Cell-Based cancer vaccines J Immunol 2018 200 2 443 449 29311386 10.4049/jimmunol.1701024 PMC5880540 Santos PM, Butterfield LH (2018) Dendritic Cell-Based cancer vaccines. J Immunol 200(2):443–449 29311386 10.4049/jimmunol.1701024 PMC5880540

89. Pyzer AR Avigan DE Rosenblatt J Clinical trials of dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines in hematologic malignancies Hum Vaccin Immunother 2014 10 11 3125 3131 25625926 10.4161/21645515.2014.982993 PMC4514037 Pyzer AR, Avigan DE, Rosenblatt J (2014) Clinical trials of dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines in hematologic malignancies. Hum Vaccin Immunother 10(11):3125–3131 25625926 10.4161/21645515.2014.982993 PMC4514037

90. Rea D Johnson ME Havenga MJ Melief CJ Offringa R Strategies for improved antigen delivery into dendritic cells Trends Mol Med 2001 7 3 91 94 11286763 10.1016/s1471-4914(01)01948-7 Rea D, Johnson ME, Havenga MJ, Melief CJ, Offringa R (2001) Strategies for improved antigen delivery into dendritic cells. Trends Mol Med 7(3):91–94 11286763 10.1016/s1471-4914(01)01948-7

91. Irvine DJ Aung A Silva M Controlling timing and location in vaccines Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2020 158 91 115 32598970 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.019 PMC7318960 Irvine DJ, Aung A, Silva M (2020) Controlling timing and location in vaccines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 158:91–115 32598970 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.019 PMC7318960

92. Lee KW Yam JWP Mao X Dendritic cell vaccines: A shift from conventional approach to new generations Cells 2023 12 17 2147 37681880 10.3390/cells12172147 PMC10486560 Lee KW, Yam JWP, Mao X (2023) Dendritic cell vaccines: A shift from conventional approach to new generations. Cells 12(17):2147 37681880 10.3390/cells12172147 PMC10486560

93. Moynihan KD Irvine DJ Roles for innate immunity in combination immunotherapies Cancer Res 2017 77 19 5215 5221 28928130 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1340 PMC5647817 Moynihan KD, Irvine DJ (2017) Roles for innate immunity in combination immunotherapies. Cancer Res 77(19):5215–5221 28928130 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1340 PMC5647817

94. Ghosh M Lenkiewicz AM Kaminska B The interplay of tumor vessels and immune cells affects immunotherapy of glioblastoma Biomedicines 2022 10 9 2292 36140392 10.3390/biomedicines10092292 PMC9496044 Ghosh M, Lenkiewicz AM, Kaminska B (2022) The interplay of tumor vessels and immune cells affects immunotherapy of glioblastoma. Biomed 10(9):2292 36140392 10.3390/biomedicines10092292 PMC9496044

95. Fucikova J Palova-Jelinkova L Bartunkova J Spisek R Induction of tolerance and immunity by dendritic cells: mechanisms and clinical applications Front Immunol 2019 10 2393 31736936 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02393 PMC6830192 Fucikova J, Palova-Jelinkova L, Bartunkova J, Spisek R (2019) Induction of tolerance and immunity by dendritic cells: mechanisms and clinical applications. Front Immunol 10:2393 31736936 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02393 PMC6830192

96. Morgan DM Horton BL Bhandarkar V Van R Dinter T Zagorulya M Expansion of tumor-reactive CD8(+) T cell clonotypes occurs in the spleen in response to immune checkpoint Blockade Sci Immunol 2024 9 99 eadi3487 39270006 10.1126/sciimmunol.adi3487 PMC11580689 Morgan DM, Horton BL, Bhandarkar V, Van R, Dinter T, Zagorulya M et al (2024) Expansion of tumor-reactive CD8(+) T cell clonotypes occurs in the spleen in response to immune checkpoint Blockade. Sci Immunol 9(99):eadi3487 39270006 10.1126/sciimmunol.adi3487 PMC11580689

97. Lu C Liu Y Ali NM Zhang B Cui X The role of innate immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and research progress in anti-tumor therapy Front Immunol 2022 13 1039260 36741415 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1039260 PMC9893925 Lu C, Liu Y, Ali NM, Zhang B, Cui X (2022) The role of innate immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and research progress in anti-tumor therapy. Front Immunol 13:1039260 36741415 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1039260 PMC9893925

98. Chen S Saeed A Liu Q Jiang Q Xu H Xiao GG Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023 8 1 207 37211559 10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1 PMC10200802 Chen S, Saeed A, Liu Q, Jiang Q, Xu H, Xiao GG et al (2023) Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther 8(1):207 37211559 10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1 PMC10200802

99. Li C Yu X Han X Lian C Wang Z Shao S Innate immune cells in tumor microenvironment: A new frontier in cancer immunotherapy iScience 2024 27 9 110750 39280627 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110750 PMC11399700 Li C, Yu X, Han X, Lian C, Wang Z, Shao S et al (2024) Innate immune cells in tumor microenvironment: A new frontier in cancer immunotherapy. iScience 27(9):110750 39280627 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110750 PMC11399700

100. Kim R Kin T Current and future therapies for Immunogenic cell death and related molecules to potentially cure primary breast cancer Cancers (Basel) 2021 13 19 10.3390/cancers13194756 PMC8507525 34638242 Kim R, Kin T (2021) Current and future therapies for Immunogenic cell death and related molecules to potentially cure primary breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 13:19 10.3390/cancers13194756 PMC8507525 34638242

101. Saeed AF Tumor-Associated macrophages: polarization, immunoregulation, and immunotherapy Cells 2025 14 10 741 40422244 10.3390/cells14100741 PMC12110377 Saeed AF (2025) Tumor-Associated macrophages: polarization, immunoregulation, and immunotherapy. Cells 14(10):741 40422244 10.3390/cells14100741 PMC12110377

102. D’Alterio C Scala S Sozzi G Roz L Bertolini G Paradoxical effects of chemotherapy on tumor relapse and metastasis promotion Semin Cancer Biol 2020 60 351 361 31454672 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.019 D’Alterio C, Scala S, Sozzi G, Roz L, Bertolini G (2020) Paradoxical effects of chemotherapy on tumor relapse and metastasis promotion. Semin Cancer Biol 60:351–361 31454672 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.019

103. Sadeghi Rad H Monkman J Warkiani ME Ladwa R O’Byrne K Rezaei N Understanding the tumor microenvironment for effective immunotherapy Med Res Rev 2021 41 3 1474 1498 33277742 10.1002/med.21765 PMC8247330 Sadeghi Rad H, Monkman J, Warkiani ME, Ladwa R, O’Byrne K, Rezaei N et al (2021) Understanding the tumor microenvironment for effective immunotherapy. Med Res Rev 41(3):1474–1498 33277742 10.1002/med.21765 PMC8247330

104. Su P Li O Ke K Jiang Z Wu J Wang Y Targeting tumor–associated macrophages: critical players in tumor progression and therapeutic strategies (Review) Int J Oncol 2024 64 6 60 38695252 10.3892/ijo.2024.5648 PMC11087038 Su P, Li O, Ke K, Jiang Z, Wu J, Wang Y et al (2024) Targeting tumor–associated macrophages: critical players in tumor progression and therapeutic strategies (Review). Int J Oncol 64(6):60 38695252 10.3892/ijo.2024.5648 PMC11087038

105. Imani S Farghadani R Roozitalab G Maghsoudloo M Emadi M Moradi A Reprogramming the breast tumor immune microenvironment: cold-to-hot transition for enhanced immunotherapy J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2025 44 1 131 40281554 10.1186/s13046-025-03394-8 PMC12032666 Imani S, Farghadani R, Roozitalab G, Maghsoudloo M, Emadi M, Moradi A et al (2025) Reprogramming the breast tumor immune microenvironment: cold-to-hot transition for enhanced immunotherapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 44(1):131 40281554 10.1186/s13046-025-03394-8 PMC12032666

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты