Introduction
Cancer continues to pose a major global health challenge, with nearly 19 million new diagnoses and around 10 million fatalities annually [ 1 , 2 ]. Despite notable progress in targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which have significantly improved survival in several patients, their impact is constrained by challenges such as treatment resistance and disease recurrence or progression. These events limit the chance of disease control by currently available therapeutics, emphasizing the need of innovative, personalized strategies. While targeted therapies and immunotherapies offer enhanced precision by focusing on specific molecular targets or leveraging the immune system, unfortunately, their success is not universal. This is largely due to cancer’s complexity and heterogeneity, which result in differential sensitivity among patients, as well as high costs and logistic hurdles associated with these treatments, making widespread accessibility difficult.
RNA-based therapies, particularly those involving non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), like microRNAs (miRNAs), represent a new emerging frontier, a promising alternative to address these challenges [ 3 ]. MiRNAs are the most studied class of regulatory ncRNAs of approximately 20–24 nucleotides, which regulate gene expression by binding to complementary sequences on messenger RNAs (mRNAs), leading to mRNA degradation or translation inhibition. Through this post-transcriptional regulation, miRNAs influence critical biological processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and metabolism, thereby helping maintain cellular homeostasis. Dysregulation of miRNAs can disrupt these processes, contributing to the development of diseases, including cancer, by either promoting oncogenic pathways or hampering tumor-suppressive functions [ 4 , 5 ].
MiRNA-based therapies exploit the dual role of miRNAs in cancer, targeting either oncogenic miRNAs (oncomiRs) or tumor-suppressive miRNAs to restore balance. Oncogenic miRNAs, when overexpressed, can drive tumor progression, whereas downregulated tumor-suppressive miRNAs fail to inhibit malignant growth. Therapeutic strategies include the use of miRNA mimics to restore the function of downregulated tumor-suppressive miRNAs or miRNA inhibitors (antimiRs) to neutralize overexpressed oncomiRs. Given their small size and chemical properties, miRNAs are conducive to synthesis and can be packaged into delivery systems tailored to target tumor cells specifically. This targeted approach could reduce the off-target effects seen in conventional treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, potentially minimizing damage to healthy cells [ 6 , 7 ].
As research advances, miRNA-based therapies hold potential to enrich oncology with personalized treatment options tailored to the unique miRNA profiles of individual tumors. This approach could not only enhance therapeutic efficacy but also mitigate adverse effects, thus leading to better outcomes for patients battling this complex disease [ 8 , 9 ].
MiRNA dysregulation in cancer
The dysregulation of miRNAs in solid tumors and hematological malignancies highlights the complex role that these molecules play in cancer development and progression [ 10 , 11 ].
Some miRNAs, such as miR-21 and miR-221, are frequently overexpressed in various cancers and promote tumorigenesis by targeting key tumor suppressor genes. For instance, miR-21, which is upregulated in breast, lung, gastric, and brain cancers, inhibits tumor suppressors like PTEN, PDCD4, and TPM1, thereby enhancing tumor growth, metastasis, and chemoresistance [ 12 ]. Similarly, miR-221 is highly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma, melanoma, colon cancer and renal cell carcinoma, where it downregulates cell cycle inhibitors like p27 and p57 to promote uncontrolled proliferation [ 13 – 16 ]. Other upregulated miRNAs, including miR-155, miR-182, and miR-200b, exhibit tumor-specific expression patterns, contributing to processes such as cell proliferation, cell survival, invasion, and metastasis.
Conversely, the downregulation of tumor suppressor miRNAs removes their inhibitory effects on oncogenic pathways, further driving tumor progression. For example, miR-143 and miR-145 are downregulated in bladder, breast, lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers [ 17 , 18 ], while the Let-7 family is suppressed in lung cancer, where its loss leads to the unchecked activity of oncogenes such as RAS and HMGA2 [ 19 ]. Similarly, miR-126 and miR-125b are reduced in breast, lung, and gastric cancers, underscoring their importance in apoptosis and cellular differentiation [ 20 , 21 ]. Finally, the miR-34 family is a tumor-suppressive miRNA in diverse cancer types, raising high interest in a broad-spectrum therapeutic approach [ 22 ]. This dual role of miRNAs highlights their complexity, as miR-21 and miR-221, while largely oncogenic, may also participate in immune regulation or stress responses depending on the tumor context. The tumor-specific dysregulation patterns of miRNAs not only demonstrate their diverse biological roles but also emphasize their potential as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarkers. A detailed summary of the key miRNAs dysregulated across solid tumors is provided in Table 1 , illustrating the overlap and tumor-specific expression patterns of these molecules.
Table 1 Expression patterns of key MiRNAs in solid tumors Solid Tumor Upregulated miRNAs/Oncogene miRNAs Downregulated miRNAs/Tumor Suppressor miRNAs Bladder Cancer miR-21, miR-182, miR-200a, miR-23b, miR-1274a miR-125b, miR-145, miR-200c, miR-143, miR-218, miR-497, miR-665 Brain Cancer miR-17/92, miR-21, miR-221, miR-222 miR-7, miR-34a, miR-124, miR-128, miR-136, miR-153, miR-137, miR-199b, miR-324-5p, miR-326, miR-451 Breast Cancer miR-10b, miR-21, miR-155, miR-210, miR-10b, miR-27a, miR-141, miR-766 miR-31, miR-125b, miR-205, let-7, miR-7, miR-30, miR-34a, miR-125, miR-127, miR-140, miR-143 Cervical Cancer miR-10a, miR-21, miR-221 miR-34a, miR-143, miR-145 Colorectal Cancer miR-17-5p, miR-21, miR-155, miR-126, miR-145, miR-155-5p, miR-592, miR-1274a miR-34a, miR-143, miR-145, miR-137-3p, miR-3622a Esophageal Cancer miR-21, miR-25, miR-155 miR-100, miR-143, miR-145 Gastric Cancer miR-21, miR-106b, miR-221, miR-21, miR-25, miR-27a, miR-93, miR-106b, miR-155 miR-101, miR-126, miR-218, let-7, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-122a, miR-141, miR-143, miR-876 Hepatocellular Carcinoma miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, miR-224, miR-21, miR-25, miR-27a, miR-93 miR-122, miR-125b, miR-199a, let-7, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-141, miR-451 Head and Neck Cancer miR-106b, miR-142-3p, miR-423, miR-6728, miR-99a, miR-20a, miR-19b miR-375, miR-125b, let-7a Lung Cancer miR-21, miR-31, miR-155, miR-210, miR-17-92, miR-21, miR-31, miR-518b, miR-629 miR-34a, miR-126, miR-200b, let-7, miR-1, miR-124a, miR-125a, miR-183, miR-190b Melanoma miR-21, miR-182, miR-221, miR-21, miR-221, miR-222 miR-34b, miR-137, miR-211, miR-7, miR-493 Ovarian Cancer miR-21, miR-200a, miR-200b, let-7, miR-199a, miR-223 miR-100, miR-125b, miR-145, miR-126, miR-134, miR-377 Pancreatic Cancer miR-21, miR-155, miR-210, miR-200b miR-34a, miR-101, miR-124, miR-142 Prostate Cancer miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, miR-141 miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-145, let-7c, miR-34, miR-125b Renal Cell Carcinoma miR-21, miR-210, miR-221, miR-19, miR-25, miR-1274a, miR-142, miR-154 miR-543 miR-106a, miR-199a, miR-363, miR-384, miR-622 Thyroid Cancer miR-146b, miR-221, miR-222 miR-1, miR-138, miR-206
Table 1
Expression patterns of key MiRNAs in solid tumors
| Solid Tumor | Upregulated miRNAs/Oncogene miRNAs | Downregulated miRNAs/Tumor Suppressor miRNAs |
| Bladder Cancer | miR-21, miR-182, miR-200a, miR-23b, miR-1274a | miR-125b, miR-145, miR-200c, miR-143, miR-218, miR-497, miR-665 |
| Brain Cancer | miR-17/92, miR-21, miR-221, miR-222 | miR-7, miR-34a, miR-124, miR-128, miR-136, miR-153, miR-137, miR-199b, miR-324-5p, miR-326, miR-451 |
| Breast Cancer | miR-10b, miR-21, miR-155, miR-210, miR-10b, miR-27a, miR-141, miR-766 | miR-31, miR-125b, miR-205, let-7, miR-7, miR-30, miR-34a, miR-125, miR-127, miR-140, miR-143 |
| Cervical Cancer | miR-10a, miR-21, miR-221 | miR-34a, miR-143, miR-145 |
| Colorectal Cancer | miR-17-5p, miR-21, miR-155, miR-126, miR-145, miR-155-5p, miR-592, miR-1274a | miR-34a, miR-143, miR-145, miR-137-3p, miR-3622a |
| Esophageal Cancer | miR-21, miR-25, miR-155 | miR-100, miR-143, miR-145 |
| Gastric Cancer | miR-21, miR-106b, miR-221, miR-21, miR-25, miR-27a, miR-93, miR-106b, miR-155 | miR-101, miR-126, miR-218, let-7, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-122a, miR-141, miR-143, miR-876 |
| Hepatocellular Carcinoma | miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, miR-224, miR-21, miR-25, miR-27a, miR-93 | miR-122, miR-125b, miR-199a, let-7, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-141, miR-451 |
| Head and Neck Cancer | miR-106b, miR-142-3p, miR-423, miR-6728, miR-99a, miR-20a, miR-19b | miR-375, miR-125b, let-7a |
| Lung Cancer | miR-21, miR-31, miR-155, miR-210, miR-17-92, miR-21, miR-31, miR-518b, miR-629 | miR-34a, miR-126, miR-200b, let-7, miR-1, miR-124a, miR-125a, miR-183, miR-190b |
| Melanoma | miR-21, miR-182, miR-221, miR-21, miR-221, miR-222 | miR-34b, miR-137, miR-211, miR-7, miR-493 |
| Ovarian Cancer | miR-21, miR-200a, miR-200b, let-7, miR-199a, miR-223 | miR-100, miR-125b, miR-145, miR-126, miR-134, miR-377 |
| Pancreatic Cancer | miR-21, miR-155, miR-210, miR-200b | miR-34a, miR-101, miR-124, miR-142 |
| Prostate Cancer | miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, miR-141 | miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-145, let-7c, miR-34, miR-125b |
| Renal Cell Carcinoma | miR-21, miR-210, miR-221, miR-19, miR-25, miR-1274a, miR-142, miR-154 miR-543 | miR-106a, miR-199a, miR-363, miR-384, miR-622 |
| Thyroid Cancer | miR-146b, miR-221, miR-222 | miR-1, miR-138, miR-206 |
Similarly, the dysregulation of miRNAs in hematological malignancies significantly contributes to cancer onset, progression, and resistance to therapy, reflecting their diverse roles as oncogenes or tumor suppressors [ 23 ]. In multiple myeloma (MM), for example, miR-21 and miR-221 are frequently upregulated, enhancing cell survival, proliferation, and drug resistance [ 24 , 25 ], while tumor suppressive miRNAs like miR-29b and miR-34a are downregulated [ 26 , 27 ], contributing to disease aggressiveness and poor prognosis. Similarly, in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), upregulated miRNAs such as miR-21, miR-221, miR-155, and miR-181a promote leukemogenesis by enhancing cell proliferation and shortening survival [ 28 – 31 ], whereas the downregulation of miR-34a, miR-29b, and miR-223 removes critical checkpoints on cell cycle regulation and apoptosis, enabling malignant growth [ 29 ]. Moreover, it has been shown that miRNA expression signatures are associated with cytogenetics and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and some miRNA expression patterns correlate with survival [ 32 ]. Notably, miR-21 emerges as a common oncogenic factor across various hematological malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), underscoring its potential as both a biomarker and therapeutic target [ 33 ]. In DLBCL and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), upregulated miR-17, miR-155, and miR-210 contribute to tumor progression, while downregulated miR-34a, miR-144, and miR-150 highlight their tumor suppressive roles [ 34 ]. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) further exemplifies this dual nature, with miR-21 and miR-155 acting as oncogenes, along with the frequent loss of tumor suppressor miRNAs like miR-146 and miR-150, demonstrate common pathways that drive hematological malignancies [ 35 ]. These findings emphasize the therapeutic potential of targeting specific miRNAs to control leukemogenesis and lymphomagenesis. Table 2 summarizes the expression patterns of key miRNAs in hematological malignancies, offering a comprehensive view of their oncogenic and tumor suppressive roles.
Table 2 Expression patterns of key MiRNAs in hematological malignancies Hematopoietic Malignancy Upregulated miRNAs Downregulated miRNAs Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) miR-21, miR-155, miR-181a miR-34a, miR-126, miR-150 Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) miR-10b, miR-21, miR-155, miR-181a miR-34a, miR-29b, miR-223 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) miR-21, miR-155 miR-15a, miR-16-1, miR-34a Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) miR-21, miR-181b miR-30a, miR-223 Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) miR-17, miR-21, miR-155, miR-222 miR-34a, miR-144, miR-181a Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) miR-21, miR-155, miR-210 miR-26a, miR-125b, miR-150 Multiple Myeloma (MM) miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, miR-223 miR-29b, miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-155
Table 2
Expression patterns of key MiRNAs in hematological malignancies
| Hematopoietic Malignancy | Upregulated miRNAs | Downregulated miRNAs |
| Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) | miR-21, miR-155, miR-181a | miR-34a, miR-126, miR-150 |
| Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) | miR-10b, miR-21, miR-155, miR-181a | miR-34a, miR-29b, miR-223 |
| Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) | miR-21, miR-155 | miR-15a, miR-16-1, miR-34a |
| Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) | miR-21, miR-181b | miR-30a, miR-223 |
| Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) | miR-17, miR-21, miR-155, miR-222 | miR-34a, miR-144, miR-181a |
| Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) | miR-21, miR-155, miR-210 | miR-26a, miR-125b, miR-150 |
| Multiple Myeloma (MM) | miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, miR-223 | miR-29b, miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-155 |
Despite the association of upregulated miRNAs with oncogenic activity, not all upregulated miRNAs act as oncogenes. Their function and classification can depend heavily on cellular context and target interactions, which may vary among cancer types. Some miRNAs exhibit dual roles, acting as both oncogenes and tumor suppressors depending on the tumor microenvironment and specific signaling pathways involved [ 36 ]. Recognizing the nuanced role of miRNAs in cancer can aid in developing targeted miRNA-based therapies for a wide array of malignancies.
MiRNA replacement and Inhibition strategies
miRNA-based therapeutic strategies, including miRNA replacement and inhibition, are emerging as promising approaches for cancer treatment, offering the potential to restore or suppress the function of specific miRNAs that are dysregulated in various solid and hematological malignancies [ 37 – 40 ]. miRNA mimics, which are synthetic versions of natural miRNAs, are designed to replace the lost tumor-suppressive functions of these miRNAs. These mimics are introduced into cancer cells to restore the activity of miRNAs like let-7 [ 41 ], miR-34a [ 27 , 42 , 43 ], or miR-29b [ 26 , 44 – 49 ] which are often downregulated in malignancies. By reactivating these tumor-suppressive miRNAs, miRNA mimics can suppress tumor growth, induce apoptosis, and inhibit metastasis. Many preclinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of miRNA mimics in reducing tumor growth and improving the response to conventional therapies, making them attractive candidates for therapeutic development.
On the other hand, miRNA inhibitors (also called antimiRs) are antisense oligonucleotides designed to block the activity of oncogenic miRNAs that are upregulated in cancers. These inhibitors are typically intended to bind the target miRNA and prevent it from interacting with its mRNA targets, thus reversing the oncogenic effects of miRNAs. By targeting and inhibiting specific oncomiRs, such as miR-21 [ 24 , 50 – 52 ], miR-221 [ 14 , 25 , 53 – 57 ], and miR-17/92 cluster [ 58 ], these inhibitors can restore the activity of tumor suppressor pathways, reduce cell proliferation, and also enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapy [ 59 , 60 ]. Figure 1 illustrates the biogenesis pathway of miRNAs, the effects of their dysregulation in tumor cells, and their potential as targets for miRNA-based therapeutic approaches.
Fig. 1 miRNA Biogenesis and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer. miRNAs biogenesis is a multi-step process that begins in the nucleus where are transcribed as pri-miRNAs by RNA polymerase II. Then the pri-miRNAs are cleaved by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex into precursor pre-miRNAs that leave the cytoplasm by Exportin-5 where the enzyme Dicer further processes pre-miRNAs into mature miRNAs. The mature miRNAs are incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), where they guide degradation or repression of target mRNAs, ultimately affecting protein production. miRNAs regulate genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and differentiation, their dysregulation is often linked to cancer. They can act as either: OncomiRs (Oncogenic miRNAs)– Promote cancer by suppressing tumor suppressor genes, or Tumor Suppressor miRNAs– Prevent cancer by inhibiting oncogenes. This makes miRNAs promising therapeutic targets in cancer by miRNA inhibition– blocking oncomiRs with ASOs or miRNA mimics– restoring tumor suppressor miRNAs to suppress cancer growth

Both miRNA mimics and inhibitors face challenges related to delivery mechanisms, stability in the bloodstream, and off-target effects. To overcome these barriers, innovative delivery systems, such as nanoparticles and liposomes, are being developed to efficiently deliver miRNA-based drugs to the tumor site while minimizing systemic toxicity. Furthermore, understanding the context-dependent functions of miRNAs is crucial for optimizing their therapeutic application. Therefore, the ability to precisely target specific miRNA pathways in distinct cancer contexts will be critical for the success of miRNA-based therapies.
Therefore, miRNA replacement and inhibition strategies have the potential to expand the landscape of cancer therapy by offering a selectively targeted approach to modulate the expression of key regulators of tumorigenesis. The development of miRNA mimics and inhibitors as therapeutic agents has shown promising results in preclinical and early clinical trials, and ongoing research is focused on refining delivery systems and improving specificity to ensure their clinical success in treating cancer.
Delivery systems and stability challenges of miRNA-based therapies
The successful development of miRNA-based therapeutics for cancer treatment relies on addressing critical challenges, including the instability of miRNAs in circulation and their limited ability to penetrate target cells. Due to their susceptibility to rapid degradation by RNases and their hydrophilic, negatively charged nature, effective delivery systems are essential to enhance miRNA stability, bioavailability and specificity.
Among the most promising solutions for delivery are lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), polymeric nanoparticles, and exosomes. LNPs shield miRNAs from enzymatic degradation, enable controlled release, and facilitate cellular uptake. They can be further modified with targeting ligands, such as antibodies or peptides, to improve delivery precision, thereby minimizing off-target effects and enhancing therapeutic outcomes. LNPs have shown considerable success in RNA-based therapies, including siRNA and mRNA treatments, and are now being explored extensively for miRNA delivery in cancer models [ 61 ]. Similarly, polymeric nanoparticles, particularly those made from biocompatible materials like PLGA (poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)), offer tumor-specific delivery by responding to stimuli such as pH shifts or enzymatic activity within the tumor microenvironment [ 62 ]. This enables controlled, localized miRNA release, which enhances therapeutic efficacy. Exosome-based delivery systems have also gained traction due to the natural role of exosomes in intercellular communication [ 63 ]. These vesicles efficiently transport miRNAs without triggering immune responses, offering superior biocompatibility compared to synthetic nanoparticles. Additionally, exosomes can be engineered to carry higher miRNA payloads and deliver them selectively to target cells. However, challenges remain in the large-scale production and clinical translation of exosome-based therapies [ 64 ].
For improved stability, high affinity and specificity of binding, Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) represent a promising approach. LNAs are chemically modified RNA analogs with a rigid ribose structure that confers resistance to nuclease degradation while significantly enhancing affinity for target miRNAs. LNAs have demonstrated success in inhibiting oncogenic miRNAs, such as miR-21 [ 24 ] and miR-221 [ 56 ], as well as the inhibition mediated by LNA-miR-361 [ 65 ]. LNA-miR-29b [ 66 ] and LNA-miR-34a [ 67 ] demonstrated efficient tumor cell growth modulation in vitro and in vivo. By silencing oncomiRs, LNAs can restore tumor suppressor gene function, inhibit tumor progression, and provide prolonged therapeutic effects, reducing the need for frequent dosing and improving patient compliance [ 68 – 70 ].
Other innovative tools include CRISPR-Cas9-based systems, which allow for precise manipulation of miRNA expression directly at the genomic level. These interventions enable durable and highly specific regulation of miRNA activity, holding significant potential for treating cancers driven by miRNA dysregulation [ 71 ]. Furthermore, miRNA sponges, engineered constructs that sequester specific miRNAs, have emerged as tools to inhibit harmful miRNAs that contribute to tumor growth [ 72 ]. Delivery of these constructs using nanoparticles or liposomes ensures stability and efficient intracellular uptake. Lastly, small molecules capable of modulating miRNA expression are being explored as adjuncts, either enhancing tumor-suppressive miRNAs (e.g., miR-34a, let-7) or inhibiting oncogenic miRNAs.
Although viral vectors, such as adenoviruses and lentiviruses, are efficient tools for miRNA delivery due to their high gene transfer potential, they are challenging for eliciting immune responses and mutagenic risks. Ongoing advancements aim to optimize these vectors to balance their efficiency with safety [ 73 ].
In summary, continued innovation in delivery platforms, such as lipid nanoparticles, polymeric carriers, exosomes, LNAs, and genome-editing tools, remains crucial for overcoming the limitations of miRNA-based therapeutics. These technologies not only enhance the stability, targeting, and bioavailability of miRNAs but also minimize side effects, ultimately improving the efficacy and clinical translation of miRNA-based cancer therapies.
Off-target effects and toxicity
miRNA-based therapies, including the use of miRNA mimics and miRNA inhibitors, offer significant promise for cancer treatment but hold concerns over off-target effects, immune responses, and unintended toxicity. Off-target effects, wherein miRNA mimics or inhibitors bind to and regulate unintended genes, represent a primary challenge. Taking into account that miRNAs can target multiple mRNA transcripts due to their partial complementarity, synthetic miRNAs may inadvertently affect various cellular pathways, potentially disrupting normal cell functions or even promoting oncogenesis in non-cancerous tissues [ 74 , 75 ]. For example, miRNA mimics that restore tumor-suppressive functions could downregulate essential genes in healthy cells, while anti-miRs aimed at antagonizing oncogenic miRNAs may suppress non pro-tumors miRNAs with sequences similarity, leading to undesirable effects [ 76 ].
Another layer of complexity arises from the delivery systems used for miRNA therapeutics, which include, as above mentioned, lipid nanoparticles, polymeric carriers, and viral vectors. These systems may also introduce toxicity. Lipid nanoparticles, commonly used for miRNA delivery, can disrupt cell membranes and accumulate in organs, like the liver, causing hepatic toxicity and inflammation [ 77 ]. Viral vectors, while effective in delivering genetic material, pose risks such as insertional mutagenesis, which can lead to oncogenesis due to unintended integration into the host genome [ 78 ]. Furthermore, chemical modifications applied to enhance the stability of miRNAs, such as 2’-O-methyl or LNA modifications, can increase immune activation, as these alterations may trigger toll-like receptors (TLRs) on immune cells, leading to inflammatory responses and tissue damage [ 79 ].
Immune responses are another critical concern, as miRNA-based therapies can inadvertently activate both local and systemic immune reactions. Delivery systems, particularly lipid-based nanoparticles, can activate the complement system, leading to hypersensitivity reactions and, in severe cases, anaphylaxis, a phenomenon known as complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA) [ 80 ]. Innate immune activation is also possible, as some RNA molecules are recognized as pathogenic by TLRs, resulting in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [ 81 ]. To mitigate these issues, researchers are investigating immune compliant strategies, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating on nanoparticles, to reduce immunogenicity; however, these modifications can reduce delivery efficiency and may introduce additional challenges [ 82 ].
Adding to the complexity of this scenario is the fact that miRNAs can exhibit context-dependent functions, meaning that a miRNA functioning as a tumor suppressor in one cancer type may act as an oncogene in another. For example, while miR-21 is often upregulated in various cancers and is generally targeted as an oncomiR, it may play protective roles in other tissues or conditions. Introducing anti-miR-21 in such contexts could harm normal cells or even worsen certain conditions, emphasizing the need for thorough evaluation of each miRNA’s roles across different biological settings [ 7 ]. This context-dependency, combined with miRNAs’ broad regulatory functions, underscores the need for precise targeting and a deep understanding of each candidate’s effects to avoid adverse side effects and optimize therapeutic outcomes [ 83 ].
Overall, miRNA mimics and anti-miRNA inhibitors hold substantial therapeutic potential but must overcome significant hurdles related to off-target effects, toxicity, and immune response. Refining delivery systems, minimizing immune activation, and improving targeting specificity remain crucial areas of research to ensure the safe and effective clinical application of these therapies [ 77 ]. Figure 2 recapitulates the main challenges of miRNA-based therapeutics.
Fig. 2 Strengths and Challenges in miRNA-Based Therapeutic Approaches. miRNA-based therapies show significant promise for cancer treatment, but various challenges must be addressed. Chemical modifications of ASOs or advanced delivery systems help overcome key issues, including: delivery efficiency, stability and degradation, off-target effects, immune response, scalability and manufacturing, regulatory and clinical validation

Regulatory challenges and commercial hurdles
The development and commercialization of miRNA therapeutics face significant regulatory and manufacturing hurdles. One of the primary regulatory challenges for miRNA therapies, whether miRNA mimics or miRNA inhibitors, is meeting stringent quality control and safety standards required for clinical use. Given the complexity of miRNA molecules, regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA require rigorous formal proofs on the safety, efficacy, and specificity before approval of miRNA-based treatments. A major concern is off-target effects, as miRNAs regulate multiple mRNAs, potentially leading to unintended interactions that could affect non-cancerous cells and contribute to toxicity [ 74 , 84 ].
Furthermore, delivery systems used to ensure miRNA stability and targeting, such as lipid nanoparticles, viral vectors and conjugated oligonucleotide approaches, introduce additional regulatory scrutiny. These delivery platforms must demonstrate not only effective tissue and cellular targeting but also minimal immunogenicity and systemic toxicity. Regulatory agencies require comprehensive biodistribution, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies to assess how miRNA therapeutics are absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and eliminated [ 85 ].The long-term persistence of miRNA drugs in non-target tissues is another safety concern that must be formally addressed in preclinical models according to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards before moving to human trials.
Manufacturing problems further challenge the clinical translation of miRNA therapeutics. Unlike small-molecule, miRNAs are inherently unstable and susceptible to degradation, making batch-to-batch consistency and quality control a critical concern. Even minor modifications in the manufacturing process can impact the stability and efficacy of miRNA products. Regulatory authorities mandate Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliance, requiring manufacturers to validate each batch’s purity, potency, and stability through advanced analytical techniques and process controls that can be costly and technically challenging [ 86 , 87 ]. Additionally, many miRNA-based drugs incorporate chemical modifications (e.g., 2’-O-methyl, phosphorothioate linkages) to enhance stability and reduce immunogenicity, which must be rigorously tested to ensure they do not alter the therapeutic efficacy or introduce unintended toxicities [ 88 ].
From a regulatory perspective, the approval pathway for miRNA-based therapies follows the evolving framework established for oligonucleotide-based drugs. Guidelines such as ICH M3(R2) outline the necessary toxicology, biodistribution, and long-term safety assessments, required before clinical trials can commence. Additionally, companion diagnostics (CDx) may be required if miRNA therapies are designed for biomarker-driven patient stratification, further adding to the regulatory burden. The FDA’s Breakthrough Therapy Designation or EMA’s PRIME (Priority Medicines) program may offer accelerated pathways for promising miRNA therapies, but meeting these criteria requires substantial early-stage clinical evidence.
From a commercial perspective, the high costs associated with the development and production of miRNA therapies, compounded by the stringent regulatory requirements, may deter investment and delay market entry. Pharmaceutical companies must allocate relevant resourced to developing precise and scalable delivery platforms. miRNA drugs need to be thoroughly evaluated for their cost-effectiveness. This involves assessing the overall cost of development (including research, clinical trials, regulatory approvals, and manufacturing related to the potential value in terms of health benefits. For miRNA-based therapies an additional challenge can be due to overlapping patents on miRNA sequences, chemical modifications, and delivery technologies, potentially limiting commercial viability [ 89 , 90 ].
A comprehensive analysis of the potential market size for miRNA-based therapies is critical. This includes a clear assessment of the number of patients who could benefit from miRNA drugs in different diseases (such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, or neurological disorders). Additionally, the need of addressing global therapy needs should be considered, considering regional differences in healthcare infrastructure and accessibility to advanced treatments with special refer to low-medium income countries. On the other hand, a larger target population, coupled with the ability to treat multiple diseases, enhance the commercial potential of miRNA-based therapies.
Moreover, pricing for miRNA drugs must reflect the treatment’s novelty, potential benefits, and costs. However, it is also essential to consider how prices are set in the context of competition with existing therapies. If the price of miRNA drugs is set too high, it may limit their accessibility, particularly in markets with reduced healthcare resources. On the other hand, pricing it too low could undercut the revenue potential needed to cover research and development costs. A balanced approach to pricing, considering the payer landscape, reimbursement strategies, and economic constraints in different markets, is essential for the commercial success of miRNA drugs.
Despite these challenges, advances in artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery, high-throughput screening and next-generation delivery technologies are helping to accelerate the clinical translation of miRNA therapeutics. With regulatory frameworks evolving to accommodate RNA-based drugs, addressing safety, manufacturing and commercial scalability will be key to unlocking the full therapeutic potential of miRNA-based interventions.
However, the entire field of RNA therapeutics exhibits greater plasticity compared to other approaches. This was demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic by the rapid availability of vaccines just months after virus was sequenced, as well as the swift adaptation to next- generation, mutation-driven vaccines. The same applies to miRNA therapeutics, which benefit from enhanced modelling through artificial intelligence prediction tools.
In conclusion, while miRNA therapies hold high potential, the path to regulatory approval and commercial success is fraught with challenges. Ensuring consistent quality, addressing safety concerns and developing effective, scalable manufacturing processes are essential to overcoming regulatory hurdles. These regulatory and commercial challenges underscore the need for ongoing research and innovation to optimize miRNA therapeutic development, enhance delivery strategies, and reduce manufacturing costs to lead to market successfully these promising treatments [ 7 , 91 ].
Current clinical trials and outcomes on MiRNA therapeutics in cancer treatments
miRNA-based therapies in clinical trials can be broadly categorized into two strategies: miRNAs as drugs which substantially refer to miRNA mimics to restore tumor-suppressive miRNA expression, and miRNAs as targets, which focus on miRNA inhibitors or a variety of inhibitory approaches, including ASOs, LNAs or miRNA sponges, to silence oncogenic miRNAs. Table 3 list the most relevant recent clinical trial in the treatment of solid and hematological malignancies.
Table 3 Most relevant recent clinical trial in the treatment of solid and hematological malignancies Target miRNA Drug Molecular Type Modification & Delivery Cancer target Stage ID Status Route of Administration Sponsor/ Company Reference miR-34a MRX34 Mimic Liposome-formulated (NOV40) Liver cancer, NSCLC, renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma, melanoma, advanced solid tumors Phase I/Ib NCT01829971 Completed NCT02862145Terminated Intravenous Mirna Therapeutics [ 92 ], [ 93 ] miR-16 TARGOmiRs Mimic Bacterial minicell-derived EVs Malignant pleural mesothelioma, NSCLC Phase I NCT02369198 Completed Intravenous Asbestos Diseases Research Foundation [ 94 ] miR-193a INT-1B3 Mimic Lipid nanoparticle Advanced Solid Tumors Phase I/Ib NCT04675996Terminated Intravenous InteRNA miR-221 LNA-i-miR-221 Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) LNA-modified Advanced solid tumors, multiple myeloma, refractory hepatocarcinoma Phase I NCT04811898Completed Intravenous Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy [ 53 ] miR-155 Cobomarsen Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) PS backbone modification Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (Mycosis Fungoides Subtype), DLBCL Phase I/ II NCT02580552Completed NCT03713320Terminated Intravenous miRagen Therapeutics, Inc miR-10b TTX-MC138 AMO Dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticle Advanced solid tumors Phase 0 Phase I/II NCT05908773Completed NCT06260774Recruiting Intravenous TransCode Therapeutics miR-21 Lademirsen Chemically modified ASO PS-modified backbone Alport syndrome, renal disfunction Phase II NCT02855268Terminated Subcutaneous Genzyme, a Sanofi Company [ 99 ]
Table 3
Most relevant recent clinical trial in the treatment of solid and hematological malignancies
| Target miRNA | Drug | Molecular Type | Modification & Delivery | Cancer target | Stage | ID Status | Route of Administration | Sponsor/ Company | Reference |
| miR-34a | MRX34 | Mimic | Liposome-formulated (NOV40) | Liver cancer, NSCLC, renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma, melanoma, advanced solid tumors | Phase I/Ib | NCT01829971 Completed NCT02862145Terminated | Intravenous | Mirna Therapeutics | [ 92 ], [ 93 ] |
| miR-16 | TARGOmiRs | Mimic | Bacterial minicell-derived EVs | Malignant pleural mesothelioma, NSCLC | Phase I | NCT02369198 Completed | Intravenous | Asbestos Diseases Research Foundation | [ 94 ] |
| miR-193a | INT-1B3 | Mimic | Lipid nanoparticle | Advanced Solid Tumors | Phase I/Ib | NCT04675996Terminated | Intravenous | InteRNA | |
| miR-221 | LNA-i-miR-221 | Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) | LNA-modified | Advanced solid tumors, multiple myeloma, refractory hepatocarcinoma | Phase I | NCT04811898Completed | Intravenous | Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy | [ 53 ] |
| miR-155 | Cobomarsen | Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) | PS backbone modification | Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (Mycosis Fungoides Subtype), DLBCL | Phase I/ II | NCT02580552Completed NCT03713320Terminated | Intravenous | miRagen Therapeutics, Inc | |
| miR-10b | TTX-MC138 | AMO | Dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticle | Advanced solid tumors | Phase 0 Phase I/II | NCT05908773Completed NCT06260774Recruiting | Intravenous | TransCode Therapeutics | |
| miR-21 | Lademirsen | Chemically modified ASO | PS-modified backbone | Alport syndrome, renal disfunction | Phase II | NCT02855268Terminated | Subcutaneous | Genzyme, a Sanofi Company | [ 99 ] |
One of the most prominent examples of miRNAs as drugs is MRX34, a liposome-formulated mimic of miR-34a, a well-characterized tumor suppressor. Notably, miR-34a was the first miRNA mimic tested in cancer patients, marking a major milestone in the clinical translation of miRNA therapeutics. By restoring miR-34a expression, MRX34 aimed to suppress oncogenic pathways and induce apoptosis. MRX34 was evaluated in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation Phase I clinical trial ( NCT01829971 ), given intravenously twice weekly (BIW) for three weeks in 4-week cycles, with oral dexamethasone premedication, to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, PKs, and clinical activity. Results in forty-seven patients with various solid tumors including liver cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, lymphoma, and other advanced solid tumors indicated acceptable safety and showed evidence of antitumor activity in a subset of patients with refractory advanced solid tumors. The MTD for the BIW schedule was 110 mg/m2 for non-HCC and 93 mg/m2 for HCC patients84 defined as recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) [ 92 ]. In an expansion cohorts consisting in 85 adults with various solid tumors refractory to standard treatments, MRX34 used at the RP2D was observed a manageable toxicity profile in most patients and some clinical activity. A multicenter Phase 1B study ( NCT02862145 ) included 3 cycles of MRX34 treatment given over an approximately 8 week period was designed to investigate the biomarkers, PKs and PDs in patients with melanoma patients with easily accessible lesions. Unfortunately, the trial was terminated due to severe immune-related adverse events (AEs), that resulted in four patient deaths, underscoring safety and delivery challenges in the miRNA mimic therapy [ 93 ].
Another innovative approach involving miRNA mimics is TARGOmiRs, a bacterial minicell-derived extracellular vesicle delivery system carrying a mimic of miR-16. This therapy was evaluated in a traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation Phase I trial ( NCT02369198 ) for malignant pleural mesothelioma and NSCLC, treated via 20 min intravenous infusion (IV) either once or twice a week (3 days apart) at a dose of 5 × 10 9 per week, in 27 patients included in five dose cohorts. By reintroducing miR-16, a key tumor suppressor, TARGOmiRs demonstrated acceptable safety profile and early sign of tumor-suppressive effects with one patient (5%) achieving a partial response and 15 (68%) had stable disease, warrants further clinical investigation in larger studies [ 94 ].
A lipid-nanoparticle formulated with a double stranded chemically-modified miR-193a-3p mimic is also under investigation in a Phase I/Ib trial ( NCT04675996 ) based on promising preclinical findings [ 95 , 96 ]. miR-193b acts as a tumor suppressor, and its transient restoration through lipid nanoparticle (LNP), formulated with chemically modified miR-193b (INT-1B3) mimic treatments has strong anti-leukemic effects in a clinically relevant system based on PDXs triggering a long-term T cell mediated immune response against tumor antigens via the induction of immunogenic cell death and modulation of the tumor microenvironment. INT-1B3 clinical investigations were performed in a two-phase dose escalation first-in-human study, to evaluate the safety, PKs, PDs, and preliminary efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. Both in phase 1 and phase 1b patients were treated with 60-min IV infusions twice per week in 21-day cycles. Unfortunately, the study was terminated for insufficient funding and to our knowledge, no clinical outcome has been reported.
On the other hand, therapies targeting oncogenic miRNAs (miRNAs as target) have shown considerable therapeutic promise. A landmark example is the recently completed study on LNA-i-miR-221, the very first LNA miRNA-inhibitor evaluated in cancer patients with refractory advanced disease. In this phase I, dose-escalation trial ( NCT04811898 ), LNA-i-miR-221 demonstrated an excellent safety profile and promising clinical activity. Patients with progressive cancers received IV infusions of LNA-i-miR-221. No grade 3–4 toxicities or dose-limiting toxicities was observed, and the MTD was not reached. Notably, 50% of patients achieved disease control (stable disease), and one patient with colorectal cancer experienced a durable partial response lasting over three years and presently is still alive. PD analyses confirmed the downregulation of miR-221 and the upregulation of its canonical targets, CDKN1B/p27 and PTEN. These encouraging findings support further the clinical development of LNA-i-miR-221 as a promising novel therapeutic agent to be investigated in a phase II study for solid tumors [ 53 ].
Another, LNA-ASO is Cobomarsen (MRG-106), targeting miR-155, a miRNA highly implicated in hematological malignancies [ 97 ]. Cobomarsen is being investigated in Phase I and II trials ( NCT02580552 ; NCT03713320 ) for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Using chemically stabilized ASOs with phosphorothioate (PS) backbones, Cobomarsen aims to inhibit miR-155, thereby restoring normal gene expression and reducing tumor progression [ 97 , 98 ]. Phase I was successfully completed, demonstrating favorable and safety profile across 45 patients treated with 75 mg intra tumoral or 300, 600, 900 mg IV dose and improvements in disease and quality of life over the first 100 days on study drug. Phase II study (SOLAR) was then expanded to include patients with CLL, DLBCL, and ATLL diseases, characterized by increased miR-155 expression. Patients received 300 or 600 mg infusions that showed similar efficacy and tolerability, offering the most consistent response rate based on skin mSWAT scores in Phase 1 study. However, it was ultimately terminated for changes in firm strategies rather than for safety concerns or lack of efficacy.
The investigational agent TTX-MC138 represents another miRNA-targeted approach. TTX-MC138, LNA-based antagomirs, TransCode’s proprietary, was delivered to metastatic sites by aminated dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles, to specifically inhibits miR-10b, a key miRNA driving tumor metastasis. In the Phase 0 microdose trial ( NCT05908773 ), in subjects with advanced solid tumors and radiographically confirmed metastases, was assessed the PK and biodistribution of TTX-MC138 as determined by PET-MRI. The phase I/II multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study of TTX-MC138 ( NCT06260774 ) is now recruiting patients with advanced solid tumors. Three study periods are designed: Screening (up to 28 days), treatment is based on 28-day cycles, with dosing on Day 1, and survival follow- up. Each 28-day cycle includes 1 dose of study drug administered as an IV on Day 1, starting from 0.4 mg/kg to 3.2 mg/kg or MTD assessment. TTX-MC138 aims to suppress metastatic progression, offering a novel therapeutic option for patients with highly invasive cancers.
Additionally, Lademirsen, an ASO targeting miR-21, is being evaluated in a Phase II trial with a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period followed by an open-label period ( NCT02855268 ). The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of miR-21 inhibition on rate of eGFR decline in adults with Alport syndrome (AS) at risk of rapid disease progression. MiR-21 is an established oncomiR overexpressed in various cancers, contributing to tumor proliferation and chemoresistance. By silencing miR-21, Lademirsen seeks to reverse oncogenic processes and restore tumor suppressor gene function. Preclinical models of AS disease have suggested that targeting miR-21 may slow the decline in kidney function in individuals affected by the disease. Forty-three adults with AS participated and 28 completed 48 weeks of double-blind treatment. No significant differences between groups were identified in eGFR at any timepoint. The study results summarize that while anti-miR-21 therapy with Lademirsen was generally well-tolerated with an acceptable safety profile, no meaningful improvement in rate of kidney function decline in adults with AS at risk of rapidly progressive disease was however observed [ 99 ].
Collectively, these clinical trials demonstrate a growing interest for the therapeutic potential of miRNA-based strategies, including the use of miRNA mimics to restore tumor suppressors or miRNA inhibitors to silence oncogenic miRNAs. Advances in delivery systems, such as lipid nanoparticles, extracellular vesicles, and nanoparticle-based carriers, alongside chemically stabilized oligonucleotides like LNAs are driving the clinical success of these treatments. Despite challenges related to delivery optimization and immune responses, ongoing trials underscore the feasibility of miRNA-based therapies and their potential to transform cancer treatment.
An outstanding point is the effect of miRNA therapeutics on patient quality of life. Although this aspect can be formally addressed only on large patient cohorts by assessing Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs), the first-in-human study by Tassone et al. provided preliminary evidence of an improvement of neurotoxicity symptoms in late-stage cancer patients treated with LNA-i-miR-221. This finding may have a solid rationale in the pleiotropic effects of miR-221 on neuronal conduction (unpublished results).
Future directions and conclusion
The progression of miRNA-based therapeutics from preclinical studies to clinical trials marks a significant advancement in precision oncology. Despite challenges such as delivery specificity and potential toxicity, ongoing innovations are enhancing miRNA stability and refining targeted delivery systems to overcome these obstacles.
An exciting future direction lies in the potential for combining miRNA-based therapies with existing treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapies. These synergistic approaches may enhance therapeutic efficacy by leveraging miRNA’s ability to regulate multiple oncogenic pathways and improve tumor sensitivity to conventional treatments. Additionally, miRNA-based therapies could play a pivotal role in addressing drug resistance and treating metastatic cancers, where current treatment options remain limited.
It must be considered that miRNAs can play a regulatory role which might be context dependent. While the expression of the miR-221/222 can have a favourable prognostic role at diagnosis as recently demonstrated by Soureas et al. [ 100 ], it appears to become an highly remarkable therapeutic target in refractory disease where its inhibition may lead to tumor growth control by inducing senescence and dormancy, which might be detrimental in drug sensitive disease under active treatment. This concept may lead to a paradigm change in tumor treatment based on longitudinal monitoring of the disease by single cell genomics or epigenomic signatures in the circulating tumor fractions offering the opportunity to select treatment timing.
A challenging issue is the use of novel study designs for early trials including biomodulatory effects as co-primary endpoints in seamless platform developmental paths which may derive major benefit from Artificial Intelligence. Another and correlated transformative aspect is the use of miRNA expression profiles for tailoring treatments to individual patients. By identifying unique predictive miRNA signatures, clinicians could better stratify patients, and design personalized therapeutic regimens, thereby advancing the goals of precision medicine.
Future research will likely focus on optimizing delivery systems, minimizing off-target effects, and expanding the clinical applications of miRNA therapies. Furthermore, studies exploring the combination of miRNA modulation with immune checkpoint inhibitors or CAR-T cell therapies could unlock new avenues for immuno-oncology.
Ultimately, miRNA therapeutics hold the promise of revolutionizing cancer care, offering a multifaceted approach to target both oncogenic drivers and tumor-supportive microenvironments. With continued advancements, miRNA-based treatments may emerge as integral components of next-generation oncology protocols, providing innovative solutions for improving patient outcomes in resistant advanced cancers.
The original online version of this article was revised: author, Maria Teresa Di Martino, was incorrectly tagged.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
2/24/2026
The original online version of this article was revised: author, Maria Teresa Di Martino, was incorrectly tagged.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) for its continued support of miRNA and non-coding RNA research (Projects No. 9980, 16695, and 21588). This support enabled the clinical translation of the first miRNA inhibitor in cancer patients and provided the scientific foundation for this review article.
Author contributions
M.T.D.M., P.T. and P.T. wrote and revised the manuscript.
Funding
Institutional funds.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All the authors agree to publish this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
1. Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2020 CA Cancer J Clin 2020 70 1 7 30 31912902 10.3322/caac.21590 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. 31912902 10.3322/caac.21590
2. Sung H Ferlay J Siegel RL Laversanne M Soerjomataram I Jemal A Bray F Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin 2021 71 3 209 49 33538338 10.3322/caac.21660 Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. 33538338 10.3322/caac.21660
3. Blandino G Dinami R Marcia M Anastasiadou E Ryan BM Palcau AC Fattore L Regazzo G Sestito R Loria R The new world of RNA diagnostics and therapeutics J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023 42 1 189 10.1186/s13046-023-02752-8 37507791 PMC10386627 Blandino G, Dinami R, Marcia M, Anastasiadou E, Ryan BM, Palcau AC, Fattore L, Regazzo G, Sestito R, Loria R, et al. The new world of RNA diagnostics and therapeutics. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42(1):189. 37507791 10.1186/s13046-023-02752-8 PMC10386627
4. He L Hannon GJ MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation Nat Rev Genet 2004 5 7 522 31 10.1038/nrg1379 15211354 He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(7):522–31. 15211354 10.1038/nrg1379
5. Hayes J Peruzzi PP Lawler S MicroRNAs in cancer: biomarkers, functions and therapy Trends Mol Med 2014 20 8 460 9 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.06.005 25027972 Hayes J, Peruzzi PP, Lawler S. MicroRNAs in cancer: biomarkers, functions and therapy. Trends Mol Med. 2014;20(8):460–9. 25027972 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.06.005
6. Garzon R Marcucci G Croce CM Targeting MicroRNAs in cancer: rationale, strategies and challenges Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010 9 10 775 89 10.1038/nrd3179 20885409 PMC3904431 Garzon R, Marcucci G, Croce CM. Targeting MicroRNAs in cancer: rationale, strategies and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(10):775–89. 20885409 10.1038/nrd3179 PMC3904431
7. Rupaimoole R Slack FJ MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017 16 3 203 22 10.1038/nrd.2016.246 28209991 Rupaimoole R, Slack FJ. MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(3):203–22. 28209991 10.1038/nrd.2016.246
8. Calin GA Croce CM MicroRNA signatures in human cancers Nat Rev Cancer 2006 6 11 857 66 10.1038/nrc1997 17060945 Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(11):857–66. 17060945 10.1038/nrc1997
9. Nana-Sinkam SP Croce CM Clinical applications for MicroRNAs in cancer Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013 93 1 98 104 10.1038/clpt.2012.192 23212103 Nana-Sinkam SP, Croce CM. Clinical applications for MicroRNAs in cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(1):98–104. 23212103 10.1038/clpt.2012.192
10. Melo SA Esteller M Dysregulation of MicroRNAs in cancer: playing with fire FEBS Lett 2011 585 13 2087 99 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.009 20708002 Melo SA, Esteller M. Dysregulation of MicroRNAs in cancer: playing with fire. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(13):2087–99. 20708002 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.009
11. Chen PS Su JL Hung MC Dysregulation of MicroRNAs in cancer J Biomed Sci 2012 19 1 90 10.1186/1423-0127-19-90 23075324 PMC3482395 Chen PS, Su JL, Hung MC. Dysregulation of MicroRNAs in cancer. J Biomed Sci. 2012;19(1):90. 23075324 10.1186/1423-0127-19-90 PMC3482395
12. Zhang X Liu C Li H Guo L Effects of miR-21 on proliferation and apoptosis of WT cells via PTEN/Akt pathway Exp Ther Med 2020 19 3 2155 60 32104279 10.3892/etm.2019.8376 PMC7027200 Zhang X, Liu C, Li H, Guo L. Effects of miR-21 on proliferation and apoptosis of WT cells via PTEN/Akt pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19(3):2155–60. 32104279 10.3892/etm.2019.8376 PMC7027200
13. Di Martino MT Arbitrio M Caracciolo D Cordua A Cuomo O Grillone K Riillo C Carida G Scionti F Labanca C miR-221/222 as biomarkers and targets for therapeutic intervention on cancer and other diseases: A systematic review Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2022 27 1191 224 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.02.005 35282417 PMC8891816 Di Martino MT, Arbitrio M, Caracciolo D, Cordua A, Cuomo O, Grillone K, Riillo C, Carida G, Scionti F, Labanca C, et al. miR-221/222 as biomarkers and targets for therapeutic intervention on cancer and other diseases: A systematic review. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2022;27:1191–224. 35282417 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.02.005 PMC8891816
14. Ali A Grillone K Ascrizzi S Carida G Fiorillo L Ciliberto D Staropoli N Tagliaferri P Tassone P Di Martino MT LNA-i-miR-221 activity in colorectal cancer: A reverse translational investigation Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2024 35 2 102221 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102221 38868363 PMC11168481 Ali A, Grillone K, Ascrizzi S, Carida G, Fiorillo L, Ciliberto D, Staropoli N, Tagliaferri P, Tassone P, Di Martino MT. LNA-i-miR-221 activity in colorectal cancer: A reverse translational investigation. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2024;35(2):102221. 38868363 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102221 PMC11168481
15. Di Martino MT Rossi M Caracciolo D Gulla A Tagliaferri P Tassone P Mir-221/222 are promising targets for innovative anticancer therapy Expert Opin Ther Targets 2016 20 9 1099 108 10.1517/14728222.2016.1164693 26959615 Di Martino MT, Rossi M, Caracciolo D, Gulla A, Tagliaferri P, Tassone P. Mir-221/222 are promising targets for innovative anticancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20(9):1099–108. 26959615 10.1517/14728222.2016.1164693
16. Fornari F Gramantieri L Ferracin M Veronese A Sabbioni S Calin GA Grazi GL Giovannini C Croce CM Bolondi L MiR-221 controls CDKN1C/p57 and CDKN1B/p27 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma Oncogene 2008 27 43 5651 61 10.1038/onc.2008.178 18521080 Fornari F, Gramantieri L, Ferracin M, Veronese A, Sabbioni S, Calin GA, Grazi GL, Giovannini C, Croce CM, Bolondi L, et al. MiR-221 controls CDKN1C/p57 and CDKN1B/p27 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2008;27(43):5651–61. 18521080 10.1038/onc.2008.178
17. Wu J, Zhu Y, Liu D, Cong Q, Bai C. Biological functions and potential mechanisms of miR–143–3p in cancers (Review). Oncol Rep 2024, 52(3). 10.3892/or.2024.8772 PMC11253085 38994765
18. Mozammel N Amini M Baradaran B Mahdavi SZB Hosseini SS Mokhtarzadeh A The function of miR-145 in colorectal cancer progression; an updated review on related signaling pathways Pathol Res Pract 2023 242 154290 10.1016/j.prp.2022.154290 36621158 Mozammel N, Amini M, Baradaran B, Mahdavi SZB, Hosseini SS, Mokhtarzadeh A. The function of miR-145 in colorectal cancer progression; an updated review on related signaling pathways. Pathol Res Pract. 2023;242:154290. 36621158 10.1016/j.prp.2022.154290
19. Kumar MS Erkeland SJ Pester RE Chen CY Ebert MS Sharp PA Jacks T Suppression of non-small cell lung tumor development by the let-7 MicroRNA family Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008 105 10 3903 8 10.1073/pnas.0712321105 18308936 PMC2268826 Kumar MS, Erkeland SJ, Pester RE, Chen CY, Ebert MS, Sharp PA, Jacks T. Suppression of non-small cell lung tumor development by the let-7 MicroRNA family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(10):3903–8. 18308936 10.1073/pnas.0712321105 PMC2268826
20. Jalil AT Abdulhadi MA Al-Ameer LR Abbas HA Merza MS Zabibah RS Fadhil AA The emerging role of microRNA-126 as a potential therapeutic target in cancer: a comprehensive review Pathol Res Pract 2023 248 154631 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154631 37393667 Jalil AT, Abdulhadi MA, Al-Ameer LR, Abbas HA, Merza MS, Zabibah RS, Fadhil AA. The emerging role of microRNA-126 as a potential therapeutic target in cancer: a comprehensive review. Pathol Res Pract. 2023;248:154631. 37393667 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154631
21. Huang K Dong S Li W Xie Z The expression and regulation of microRNA-125b in cancers Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2013 45 10 803 5 10.1093/abbs/gmt073 23800395 Huang K, Dong S, Li W, Xie Z. The expression and regulation of microRNA-125b in cancers. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2013;45(10):803–5. 23800395 10.1093/abbs/gmt073
22. Zhang L Liao Y Tang L MicroRNA-34 family: a potential tumor suppressor and therapeutic candidate in cancer J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2019 38 1 53 10.1186/s13046-019-1059-5 30717802 PMC6360685 Zhang L, Liao Y, Tang L. MicroRNA-34 family: a potential tumor suppressor and therapeutic candidate in cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):53. 30717802 10.1186/s13046-019-1059-5 PMC6360685
23. Lawrie CH MicroRNAs in hematological malignancies Blood Rev 2013 27 3 143 54 10.1016/j.blre.2013.04.002 23623930 Lawrie CH. MicroRNAs in hematological malignancies. Blood Rev. 2013;27(3):143–54. 23623930 10.1016/j.blre.2013.04.002
24. Leone E Morelli E Di Martino MT Amodio N Foresta U Gulla A Rossi M Neri A Giordano A Munshi NC Targeting miR-21 inhibits in vitro and in vivo multiple myeloma cell growth Clin Cancer Res 2013 19 8 2096 106 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3325 23446999 PMC4147955 Leone E, Morelli E, Di Martino MT, Amodio N, Foresta U, Gulla A, Rossi M, Neri A, Giordano A, Munshi NC, et al. Targeting miR-21 inhibits in vitro and in vivo multiple myeloma cell growth. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(8):2096–106. 23446999 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3325 PMC4147955
25. Di Martino MT Gulla A Cantafio ME Lionetti M Leone E Amodio N Guzzi PH Foresta U Conforti F Cannataro M In vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity of miR-221/222 inhibitors in multiple myeloma Oncotarget 2013 4 2 242 55 10.18632/oncotarget.820 23479461 PMC3712570 Di Martino MT, Gulla A, Cantafio ME, Lionetti M, Leone E, Amodio N, Guzzi PH, Foresta U, Conforti F, Cannataro M, et al. In vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity of miR-221/222 inhibitors in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2013;4(2):242–55. 23479461 10.18632/oncotarget.820 PMC3712570
26. Amodio N Bellizzi D Leotta M Raimondi L Biamonte L D’Aquila P Di Martino MT Calimeri T Rossi M Lionetti M miR-29b induces SOCS-1 expression by promoter demethylation and negatively regulates migration of multiple myeloma and endothelial cells Cell Cycle 2013 12 23 3650 62 10.4161/cc.26585 24091729 PMC3903716 Amodio N, Bellizzi D, Leotta M, Raimondi L, Biamonte L, D’Aquila P, Di Martino MT, Calimeri T, Rossi M, Lionetti M, et al. miR-29b induces SOCS-1 expression by promoter demethylation and negatively regulates migration of multiple myeloma and endothelial cells. Cell Cycle. 2013;12(23):3650–62. 24091729 10.4161/cc.26585 PMC3903716
27. Di Martino MT Leone E Amodio N Foresta U Lionetti M Pitari MR Cantafio ME Gulla A Conforti F Morelli E Synthetic miR-34a mimics as a novel therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma: in vitro and in vivo evidence Clin Cancer Res 2012 18 22 6260 70 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1708 23035210 PMC4453928 Di Martino MT, Leone E, Amodio N, Foresta U, Lionetti M, Pitari MR, Cantafio ME, Gulla A, Conforti F, Morelli E, et al. Synthetic miR-34a mimics as a novel therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma: in vitro and in vivo evidence. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(22):6260–70. 23035210 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1708 PMC4453928
28. Zhang L Bu Z Shen J Shang L Chen Y Zhang P Wang Y MicroRNA-221 regulates cell activity and apoptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia via regulating PTEN Exp Ther Med 2021 22 4 1133 10.3892/etm.2021.10567 34504582 PMC8383336 Zhang L, Bu Z, Shen J, Shang L, Chen Y, Zhang P, Wang Y. MicroRNA-221 regulates cell activity and apoptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia via regulating PTEN. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(4):1133. 34504582 10.3892/etm.2021.10567 PMC8383336
29. Mendiola-Soto DK, Barcenas-Lopez DA, Perez-Amado CJ, Cruz-Miranda GM, Mejia-Arangure JM, Ramirez-Bello J, Hidalgo-Miranda A, Jimenez-Morales S. MiRNAs in hematopoiesis and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Mol Sci 2023, 24(6). 10.3390/ijms24065436 PMC10049736 36982511
30. Liang C Li Y Wang LN Zhang XL Luo JS Peng CJ Tang WY Huang LB Tang YL Luo XQ Up-regulated miR-155 is associated with poor prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and promotes cell proliferation targeting ZNF238 Hematology 2021 26 1 16 25 10.1080/16078454.2020.1860187 33357126 Liang C, Li Y, Wang LN, Zhang XL, Luo JS, Peng CJ, Tang WY, Huang LB, Tang YL, Luo XQ. Up-regulated miR-155 is associated with poor prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and promotes cell proliferation targeting ZNF238. Hematology. 2021;26(1):16–25. 33357126 10.1080/16078454.2020.1860187
31. Verduci L Azzalin G Gioiosa S Carissimi C Laudadio I Fulci V Macino G microRNA-181a enhances cell proliferation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia by targeting EGR1 Leuk Res 2015 39 4 479 85 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.01.010 25740602 Verduci L, Azzalin G, Gioiosa S, Carissimi C, Laudadio I, Fulci V, Macino G. microRNA-181a enhances cell proliferation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia by targeting EGR1. Leuk Res. 2015;39(4):479–85. 25740602 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.01.010
32. Garzon R Volinia S Liu CG Fernandez-Cymering C Palumbo T Pichiorri F Fabbri M Coombes K Alder H Nakamura T MicroRNA signatures associated with cytogenetics and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia Blood 2008 111 6 3183 9 10.1182/blood-2007-07-098749 18187662 PMC2265455 Garzon R, Volinia S, Liu CG, Fernandez-Cymering C, Palumbo T, Pichiorri F, Fabbri M, Coombes K, Alder H, Nakamura T, et al. MicroRNA signatures associated with cytogenetics and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2008;111(6):3183–9. 18187662 10.1182/blood-2007-07-098749 PMC2265455
33. Feng YH Tsao CJ Emerging role of microRNA-21 in cancer Biomed Rep 2016 5 4 395 402 10.3892/br.2016.747 27699004 PMC5038362 Feng YH, Tsao CJ. Emerging role of microRNA-21 in cancer. Biomed Rep. 2016;5(4):395–402. 27699004 10.3892/br.2016.747 PMC5038362
34. Sole C Arnaiz E Lawrie CH MicroRNAs as biomarkers of B-cell lymphoma Biomark Insights 2018 13 1177271918806840 10.1177/1177271918806840 30349178 PMC6195009 Sole C, Arnaiz E, Lawrie CH. MicroRNAs as biomarkers of B-cell lymphoma. Biomark Insights. 2018;13:1177271918806840. 30349178 10.1177/1177271918806840 PMC6195009
35. Parsa-Kondelaji M Musavi M Barzegar F Abbasian N Rostami M M RS Modi SSH Nikfar M A AM-B: dysregulation of MiRNA expression in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia at diagnosis: a systematic review Biomark Med 2023 17 24 1021 9 10.2217/bmm-2023-0575 38230979 Parsa-Kondelaji M, Musavi M, Barzegar F, Abbasian N, Rostami M, M RS, Modi SSH, Nikfar M. A AM-B: dysregulation of MiRNA expression in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia at diagnosis: a systematic review. Biomark Med. 2023;17(24):1021–9. 38230979 10.2217/bmm-2023-0575
36. Lu J Getz G Miska EA Alvarez-Saavedra E Lamb J Peck D Sweet-Cordero A Ebert BL Mak RH Ferrando AA MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers Nature 2005 435 7043 834 8 10.1038/nature03702 15944708 Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435(7043):834–8. 15944708 10.1038/nature03702
37. Tagliaferri P Rossi M Di Martino MT Amodio N Leone E Gulla A Neri A Tassone P Promises and challenges of MicroRNA-based treatment of multiple myeloma Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2012 12 7 838 46 10.2174/156800912802429355 22671926 PMC3504921 Tagliaferri P, Rossi M, Di Martino MT, Amodio N, Leone E, Gulla A, Neri A, Tassone P. Promises and challenges of MicroRNA-based treatment of multiple myeloma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2012;12(7):838–46. 22671926 10.2174/156800912802429355 PMC3504921
38. Amodio N Di Martino MT Neri A Tagliaferri P Tassone P Non-coding RNA: a novel opportunity for the personalized treatment of multiple myeloma Expert Opin Biol Ther 2013 13 Suppl 1 S125 137 10.1517/14712598.2013.796356 23692413 Amodio N, Di Martino MT, Neri A, Tagliaferri P, Tassone P. Non-coding RNA: a novel opportunity for the personalized treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13(Suppl 1):S125–137. 23692413 10.1517/14712598.2013.796356
39. Caracciolo D Montesano M Altomare E Scionti F Di Martino MT Tagliaferri P Tassone P The potential role of MiRNAs in multiple myeloma therapy Expert Rev Hematol 2018 11 10 793 803 10.1080/17474086.2018.1517041 30148649 Caracciolo D, Montesano M, Altomare E, Scionti F, Di Martino MT, Tagliaferri P, Tassone P. The potential role of MiRNAs in multiple myeloma therapy. Expert Rev Hematol. 2018;11(10):793–803. 30148649 10.1080/17474086.2018.1517041
40. Grillone K Riillo C Scionti F Rocca R Tradigo G Guzzi PH Alcaro S Di Martino MT Tagliaferri P Tassone P Non-coding RNAs in cancer: platforms and strategies for investigating the genomic dark matter J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2020 39 1 117 10.1186/s13046-020-01622-x 32563270 PMC7305591 Grillone K, Riillo C, Scionti F, Rocca R, Tradigo G, Guzzi PH, Alcaro S, Di Martino MT, Tagliaferri P, Tassone P. Non-coding RNAs in cancer: platforms and strategies for investigating the genomic dark matter. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):117. 32563270 10.1186/s13046-020-01622-x PMC7305591
41. Trang P Medina PP Wiggins JF Ruffino L Kelnar K Omotola M Homer R Brown D Bader AG Weidhaas JB Regression of murine lung tumors by the let-7 MicroRNA Oncogene 2010 29 11 1580 7 10.1038/onc.2009.445 19966857 PMC2841713 Trang P, Medina PP, Wiggins JF, Ruffino L, Kelnar K, Omotola M, Homer R, Brown D, Bader AG, Weidhaas JB, et al. Regression of murine lung tumors by the let-7 MicroRNA. Oncogene. 2010;29(11):1580–7. 19966857 10.1038/onc.2009.445 PMC2841713
42. Scognamiglio I Di Martino MT Campani V Virgilio A Galeone A Gulla A Gallo Cantafio ME Misso G Tagliaferri P Tassone P Transferrin-conjugated snalps encapsulating 2’-O-methylated miR-34a for the treatment of multiple myeloma Biomed Res Int 2014 2014 217365 10.1155/2014/217365 24683542 PMC3943297 Scognamiglio I, Di Martino MT, Campani V, Virgilio A, Galeone A, Gulla A, Gallo Cantafio ME, Misso G, Tagliaferri P, Tassone P, et al. Transferrin-conjugated snalps encapsulating 2’-O-methylated miR-34a for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:217365. 24683542 10.1155/2014/217365 PMC3943297
43. Di Martino MT Campani V Misso G Gallo Cantafio ME Gulla A Foresta U Guzzi PH Castellano M Grimaldi A Gigantino V In vivo activity of miR-34a mimics delivered by stable nucleic acid lipid particles (SNALPs) against multiple myeloma PLoS ONE 2014 9 2 e90005 10.1371/journal.pone.0090005 24587182 PMC3937395 Di Martino MT, Campani V, Misso G, Gallo Cantafio ME, Gulla A, Foresta U, Guzzi PH, Castellano M, Grimaldi A, Gigantino V, et al. In vivo activity of miR-34a mimics delivered by stable nucleic acid lipid particles (SNALPs) against multiple myeloma. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e90005. 24587182 10.1371/journal.pone.0090005 PMC3937395
44. Botta C Cuce M Pitari MR Caracciolo D Gulla A Morelli E Riillo C Biamonte L Gallo Cantafio ME Prabhala R MiR-29b antagonizes the pro-inflammatory tumor-promoting activity of multiple myeloma-educated dendritic cells Leukemia 2018 32 4 1003 15 10.1038/leu.2017.336 29158557 PMC5886056 Botta C, Cuce M, Pitari MR, Caracciolo D, Gulla A, Morelli E, Riillo C, Biamonte L, Gallo Cantafio ME, Prabhala R, et al. MiR-29b antagonizes the pro-inflammatory tumor-promoting activity of multiple myeloma-educated dendritic cells. Leukemia. 2018;32(4):1003–15. 29158557 10.1038/leu.2017.336 PMC5886056
45. Rossi M Pitari MR Amodio N Di Martino MT Conforti F Leone E Botta C Paolino FM Del Giudice T Iuliano E miR-29b negatively regulates human osteoclastic cell differentiation and function: implications for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease J Cell Physiol 2013 228 7 1506 15 10.1002/jcp.24306 23254643 Rossi M, Pitari MR, Amodio N, Di Martino MT, Conforti F, Leone E, Botta C, Paolino FM, Del Giudice T, Iuliano E, et al. miR-29b negatively regulates human osteoclastic cell differentiation and function: implications for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228(7):1506–15. 23254643 10.1002/jcp.24306
46. Amodio N Di Martino MT Foresta U Leone E Lionetti M Leotta M Gulla AM Pitari MR Conforti F Rossi M miR-29b sensitizes multiple myeloma cells to bortezomib-induced apoptosis through the activation of a feedback loop with the transcription factor Sp1 Cell Death Dis 2012 3 11 e436 10.1038/cddis.2012.175 23190608 PMC3542610 Amodio N, Di Martino MT, Foresta U, Leone E, Lionetti M, Leotta M, Gulla AM, Pitari MR, Conforti F, Rossi M, et al. miR-29b sensitizes multiple myeloma cells to bortezomib-induced apoptosis through the activation of a feedback loop with the transcription factor Sp1. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3(11):e436. 23190608 10.1038/cddis.2012.175 PMC3542610
47. Amodio N Leotta M Bellizzi D Di Martino MT D’Aquila P Lionetti M Fabiani F Leone E Gulla AM Passarino G DNA-demethylating and anti-tumor activity of synthetic miR-29b mimics in multiple myeloma Oncotarget 2012 3 10 1246 58 10.18632/oncotarget.675 23100393 PMC3717964 Amodio N, Leotta M, Bellizzi D, Di Martino MT, D’Aquila P, Lionetti M, Fabiani F, Leone E, Gulla AM, Passarino G, et al. DNA-demethylating and anti-tumor activity of synthetic miR-29b mimics in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2012;3(10):1246–58. 23100393 10.18632/oncotarget.675 PMC3717964
48. Kimura Y Ohzawa H Miyato H Kaneko Y Saito A Takahashi K Tojo M Yamaguchi H Kurashina K Saito S MiR-29b May suppresses peritoneal metastases through Inhibition of the mesothelial-mesenchymal transition (MMT) of human peritoneal mesothelial cells Sci Rep 2022 12 1 205 10.1038/s41598-021-04065-2 34997082 PMC8742040 Kimura Y, Ohzawa H, Miyato H, Kaneko Y, Saito A, Takahashi K, Tojo M, Yamaguchi H, Kurashina K, Saito S, et al. MiR-29b May suppresses peritoneal metastases through Inhibition of the mesothelial-mesenchymal transition (MMT) of human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):205. 34997082 10.1038/s41598-021-04065-2 PMC8742040
49. Liu YL, Yang WH, Chen BY, Nie J, Su ZR, Zheng JN, Gong ST, Chen JN, Jiang D, Li Y. miR–29b suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma Ascites H22 cells via regulating TGF–beta1 and p53 signaling pathway. Int J Mol Med 2021, 48(2). 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4990 PMC8249050 34184070
50. Rossi M Altomare E Botta C Gallo Cantafio ME Sarvide S Caracciolo D Riillo C Gaspari M Taverna D Conforti F miR-21 antagonism abrogates Th17 tumor promoting functions in multiple myeloma Leukemia 2021 35 3 823 34 10.1038/s41375-020-0947-1 32632096 Rossi M, Altomare E, Botta C, Gallo Cantafio ME, Sarvide S, Caracciolo D, Riillo C, Gaspari M, Taverna D, Conforti F, et al. miR-21 antagonism abrogates Th17 tumor promoting functions in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2021;35(3):823–34. 32632096 10.1038/s41375-020-0947-1
51. Pitari MR Rossi M Amodio N Botta C Morelli E Federico C Gulla A Caracciolo D Di Martino MT Arbitrio M Inhibition of miR-21 restores RANKL/OPG ratio in multiple myeloma-derived bone marrow stromal cells and impairs the resorbing activity of mature osteoclasts Oncotarget 2015 6 29 27343 58 10.18632/oncotarget.4398 26160841 PMC4694994 Pitari MR, Rossi M, Amodio N, Botta C, Morelli E, Federico C, Gulla A, Caracciolo D, Di Martino MT, Arbitrio M, et al. Inhibition of miR-21 restores RANKL/OPG ratio in multiple myeloma-derived bone marrow stromal cells and impairs the resorbing activity of mature osteoclasts. Oncotarget. 2015;6(29):27343–58. 26160841 10.18632/oncotarget.4398 PMC4694994
52. Javanmard SH Vaseghi G Ghasemi A Rafiee L Ferns GA Esfahani HN Nedaeinia R Therapeutic Inhibition of microRNA-21 (miR-21) using locked-nucleic acid (LNA)-anti-miR and its effects on the biological behaviors of melanoma cancer cells in preclinical studies Cancer Cell Int 2020 20 384 10.1186/s12935-020-01394-6 32788885 PMC7418194 Javanmard SH, Vaseghi G, Ghasemi A, Rafiee L, Ferns GA, Esfahani HN, Nedaeinia R. Therapeutic Inhibition of microRNA-21 (miR-21) using locked-nucleic acid (LNA)-anti-miR and its effects on the biological behaviors of melanoma cancer cells in preclinical studies. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:384. 32788885 10.1186/s12935-020-01394-6 PMC7418194
53. Tassone P Di Martino MT Arbitrio M Fiorillo L Staropoli N Ciliberto D Cordua A Scionti F Bertucci B Salvino A Safety and activity of the first-in-class locked nucleic acid (LNA) miR-221 selective inhibitor in refractory advanced cancer patients: a first-in-human, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study J Hematol Oncol 2023 16 1 68 10.1186/s13045-023-01468-8 37365583 PMC10294514 Tassone P, Di Martino MT, Arbitrio M, Fiorillo L, Staropoli N, Ciliberto D, Cordua A, Scionti F, Bertucci B, Salvino A, et al. Safety and activity of the first-in-class locked nucleic acid (LNA) miR-221 selective inhibitor in refractory advanced cancer patients: a first-in-human, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16(1):68. 37365583 10.1186/s13045-023-01468-8 PMC10294514
54. Santolla MF Lappano R Cirillo F Rigiracciolo DC Sebastiani A Abonante S Tassone P Tagliaferri P Di Martino MT Maggiolini M miR-221 stimulates breast cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) through selective interference with the A20/c-Rel/CTGF signaling J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2018 37 1 94 10.1186/s13046-018-0767-6 29716623 PMC5930435 Santolla MF, Lappano R, Cirillo F, Rigiracciolo DC, Sebastiani A, Abonante S, Tassone P, Tagliaferri P, Di Martino MT, Maggiolini M, et al. miR-221 stimulates breast cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) through selective interference with the A20/c-Rel/CTGF signaling. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):94. 29716623 10.1186/s13046-018-0767-6 PMC5930435
55. Gulla A Di Martino MT Gallo Cantafio ME Morelli E Amodio N Botta C Pitari MR Lio SG Britti D Stamato MA A 13 Mer LNA-i-miR-221 inhibitor restores drug sensitivity in Melphalan-Refractory multiple myeloma cells Clin Cancer Res 2016 22 5 1222 33 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0489 26527748 PMC4775414 Gulla A, Di Martino MT, Gallo Cantafio ME, Morelli E, Amodio N, Botta C, Pitari MR, Lio SG, Britti D, Stamato MA, et al. A 13 Mer LNA-i-miR-221 inhibitor restores drug sensitivity in Melphalan-Refractory multiple myeloma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(5):1222–33. 26527748 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0489 PMC4775414
56. Di Martino MT Gulla A Gallo Cantafio ME Altomare E Amodio N Leone E Morelli E Lio SG Caracciolo D Rossi M In vitro and in vivo activity of a novel locked nucleic acid (LNA)-inhibitor-miR-221 against multiple myeloma cells PLoS ONE 2014 9 2 e89659 10.1371/journal.pone.0089659 24586944 PMC3931823 Di Martino MT, Gulla A, Gallo Cantafio ME, Altomare E, Amodio N, Leone E, Morelli E, Lio SG, Caracciolo D, Rossi M, et al. In vitro and in vivo activity of a novel locked nucleic acid (LNA)-inhibitor-miR-221 against multiple myeloma cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e89659. 24586944 10.1371/journal.pone.0089659 PMC3931823
57. Callegari E Elamin BK Giannone F Milazzo M Altavilla G Fornari F Giacomelli L D’Abundo L Ferracin M Bassi C Liver tumorigenicity promoted by microRNA-221 in a mouse Transgenic model Hepatology 2012 56 3 1025 33 10.1002/hep.25747 22473819 Callegari E, Elamin BK, Giannone F, Milazzo M, Altavilla G, Fornari F, Giacomelli L, D’Abundo L, Ferracin M, Bassi C, et al. Liver tumorigenicity promoted by microRNA-221 in a mouse Transgenic model. Hepatology. 2012;56(3):1025–33. 22473819 10.1002/hep.25747
58. Morelli E Biamonte L Federico C Amodio N Di Martino MT Gallo Cantafio ME Manzoni M Scionti F Samur MK Gulla A Therapeutic vulnerability of multiple myeloma to MIR17PTi, a first-in-class inhibitor of pri-miR-17-92 Blood 2018 132 10 1050 63 10.1182/blood-2018-03-836601 29997223 PMC6128086 Morelli E, Biamonte L, Federico C, Amodio N, Di Martino MT, Gallo Cantafio ME, Manzoni M, Scionti F, Samur MK, Gulla A, et al. Therapeutic vulnerability of multiple myeloma to MIR17PTi, a first-in-class inhibitor of pri-miR-17-92. Blood. 2018;132(10):1050–63. 29997223 10.1182/blood-2018-03-836601 PMC6128086
59. Li S Li Q Lu J Zhao Q Li D Shen L Wang Z Liu J Xie D Cho WC Targeted Inhibition of miR-221/222 promotes cell sensitivity to cisplatin in Triple-Negative breast Cancer MDA-MB-231 cells Front Genet 2019 10 1278 10.3389/fgene.2019.01278 32010177 PMC6971202 Li S, Li Q, Lu J, Zhao Q, Li D, Shen L, Wang Z, Liu J, Xie D, Cho WC, et al. Targeted Inhibition of miR-221/222 promotes cell sensitivity to cisplatin in Triple-Negative breast Cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Front Genet. 2019;10:1278. 32010177 10.3389/fgene.2019.01278 PMC6971202
60. Arghiani N Matin MM miR-21: A key small molecule with great effects in combination Cancer therapy Nucleic Acid Ther 2021 31 4 271 83 10.1089/nat.2020.0914 33891511 Arghiani N, Matin MM. miR-21: A key small molecule with great effects in combination Cancer therapy. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2021;31(4):271–83. 33891511 10.1089/nat.2020.0914
61. Xue HY Guo P Wen WC Wong HL Lipid-Based nanocarriers for RNA delivery Curr Pharm Des 2015 21 22 3140 7 10.2174/1381612821666150531164540 26027572 PMC4618487 Xue HY, Guo P, Wen WC, Wong HL. Lipid-Based nanocarriers for RNA delivery. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(22):3140–7. 26027572 10.2174/1381612821666150531164540 PMC4618487
62. Yang J, Zeng H, Luo Y, Chen Y, Wang M, Wu C, Hu P. Recent applications of PLGA in drug delivery systems. Polym (Basel) 2024, 16(18). 10.3390/polym16182606 PMC11435547 39339068
63. Chen H Yao H Chi J Li C Liu Y Yang J Yu J Wang J Ruan Y Pi J Engineered exosomes as drug and RNA co-delivery system: new hope for enhanced therapeutics? Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023 11 1254356 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1254356 37823027 PMC10562639 Chen H, Yao H, Chi J, Li C, Liu Y, Yang J, Yu J, Wang J, Ruan Y, Pi J, et al. Engineered exosomes as drug and RNA co-delivery system: new hope for enhanced therapeutics? Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1254356. 37823027 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1254356 PMC10562639
64. Kimiz-Gebologlu I Oncel SS Exosomes: Large-scale production, isolation, drug loading efficiency, and biodistribution and uptake J Control Release 2022 347 533 43 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.027 35597405 Kimiz-Gebologlu I, Oncel SS. Exosomes: Large-scale production, isolation, drug loading efficiency, and biodistribution and uptake. J Control Release. 2022;347:533–43. 35597405 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.027
65. Ogawa H Nakashiro KI Tokuzen N Kuribayashi N Goda H Uchida D MicroRNA-361-3p is a potent therapeutic target for oral squamous cell carcinoma Cancer Sci 2020 111 5 1645 51 10.1111/cas.14359 32086979 PMC7226181 Ogawa H, Nakashiro KI, Tokuzen N, Kuribayashi N, Goda H, Uchida D. MicroRNA-361-3p is a potent therapeutic target for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2020;111(5):1645–51. 32086979 10.1111/cas.14359 PMC7226181
66. Chen HX Xu XX Tan BZ Zhang Z Zhou XD MicroRNA-29b inhibits angiogenesis by targeting VEGFA through the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways in endometrial carcinoma Cell Physiol Biochem 2017 41 3 933 46 10.1159/000460510 28222438 Chen HX, Xu XX, Tan BZ, Zhang Z, Zhou XD. MicroRNA-29b inhibits angiogenesis by targeting VEGFA through the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways in endometrial carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;41(3):933–46. 28222438 10.1159/000460510
67. Wu X Cheng YL Matthen M Yoon A Schwartz GK Bala S Taylor AM Momen-Heravi F Down-regulation of the tumor suppressor miR-34a contributes to head and neck cancer by up-regulating the MET oncogene and modulating tumor immune evasion J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2021 40 1 70 10.1186/s13046-021-01865-2 33596979 PMC7890893 Wu X, Cheng YL, Matthen M, Yoon A, Schwartz GK, Bala S, Taylor AM, Momen-Heravi F. Down-regulation of the tumor suppressor miR-34a contributes to head and neck cancer by up-regulating the MET oncogene and modulating tumor immune evasion. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):70. 33596979 10.1186/s13046-021-01865-2 PMC7890893
68. Di Martino MT Arbitrio M Caracciolo D Scionti F Tagliaferri P Tassone P Dose-Finding study and pharmacokinetics profile of the novel 13-Mer antisense miR-221 inhibitor in Sprague-Dawley rats Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2020 20 73 85 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.01.036 32146420 PMC7058714 Di Martino MT, Arbitrio M, Caracciolo D, Scionti F, Tagliaferri P, Tassone P. Dose-Finding study and pharmacokinetics profile of the novel 13-Mer antisense miR-221 inhibitor in Sprague-Dawley rats. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;20:73–85. 32146420 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.01.036 PMC7058714
69. Fonsi M Fulbert J Billat PA Arbitrio M Tagliaferri P Tassone P Di Martino MT Scaling approaches for the prediction of human clearance of LNA-i-mir-221: A retrospective validation Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov 2024 7 100197 10.1016/j.crphar.2024.100197 39188553 PMC11345919 Fonsi M, Fulbert J, Billat PA, Arbitrio M, Tagliaferri P, Tassone P, Di Martino MT. Scaling approaches for the prediction of human clearance of LNA-i-mir-221: A retrospective validation. Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov. 2024;7:100197. 39188553 10.1016/j.crphar.2024.100197 PMC11345919
70. Kim K Kim HH Lee CH Kim S Cheon GJ Kang KW Chung JK Youn H Therapeutic efficacy of modified anti-miR21 in metastatic prostate cancer Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020 529 3 707 13 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.05.215 32736696 Kim K, Kim HH, Lee CH, Kim S, Cheon GJ, Kang KW, Chung JK, Youn H. Therapeutic efficacy of modified anti-miR21 in metastatic prostate cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;529(3):707–13. 32736696 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.05.215
71. Behrouzian Fard G Ahmadi MH Gholamin M Amirfakhrian R Saberi Teimourian E Karimi MA Hosseini Bafghi M CRISPR-Cas9 technology: as an efficient genome modification tool in the cancer diagnosis and treatment Biotechnol Bioeng 2024 121 2 472 88 10.1002/bit.28603 37986642 Behrouzian Fard G, Ahmadi MH, Gholamin M, Amirfakhrian R, Saberi Teimourian E, Karimi MA, Hosseini Bafghi M. CRISPR-Cas9 technology: as an efficient genome modification tool in the cancer diagnosis and treatment. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2024;121(2):472–88. 37986642 10.1002/bit.28603
72. Ebert MS Sharp PA MicroRNA sponges: progress and possibilities RNA 2010 16 11 2043 50 10.1261/rna.2414110 20855538 PMC2957044 Ebert MS, Sharp PA. MicroRNA sponges: progress and possibilities. RNA. 2010;16(11):2043–50. 20855538 10.1261/rna.2414110 PMC2957044
73. Xie J Burt DR Gao G Adeno-associated virus-mediated MicroRNA delivery and therapeutics Semin Liver Dis 2015 35 1 81 8 10.1055/s-0034-1397352 25632938 PMC4460833 Xie J, Burt DR, Gao G. Adeno-associated virus-mediated MicroRNA delivery and therapeutics. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(1):81–8. 25632938 10.1055/s-0034-1397352 PMC4460833
74. Chakraborty C Sharma AR Sharma G Lee SS Therapeutic advances of MiRNAs: A preclinical and clinical update J Adv Res 2021 28 127 38 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.012 33364050 PMC7753224 Chakraborty C, Sharma AR, Sharma G, Lee SS. Therapeutic advances of MiRNAs: A preclinical and clinical update. J Adv Res. 2021;28:127–38. 33364050 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.012 PMC7753224
75. Li Z Rana TM Molecular mechanisms of RNA-triggered gene Silencing machineries Acc Chem Res 2012 45 7 1122 31 10.1021/ar200253u 22304792 PMC3398549 Li Z, Rana TM. Molecular mechanisms of RNA-triggered gene Silencing machineries. Acc Chem Res. 2012;45(7):1122–31. 22304792 10.1021/ar200253u PMC3398549
76. Davis ME Zuckerman JE Choi CH Seligson D Tolcher A Alabi CA Yen Y Heidel JD Ribas A Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered SiRNA via targeted nanoparticles Nature 2010 464 7291 1067 70 10.1038/nature08956 20305636 PMC2855406 Davis ME, Zuckerman JE, Choi CH, Seligson D, Tolcher A, Alabi CA, Yen Y, Heidel JD, Ribas A. Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered SiRNA via targeted nanoparticles. Nature. 2010;464(7291):1067–70. 20305636 10.1038/nature08956 PMC2855406
77. Reichmuth AM Oberli MA Jaklenec A Langer R Blankschtein D mRNA vaccine delivery using lipid nanoparticles Ther Deliv 2016 7 5 319 34 10.4155/tde-2016-0006 27075952 PMC5439223 Reichmuth AM, Oberli MA, Jaklenec A, Langer R, Blankschtein D. mRNA vaccine delivery using lipid nanoparticles. Ther Deliv. 2016;7(5):319–34. 27075952 10.4155/tde-2016-0006 PMC5439223
78. Bessis N GarciaCozar FJ Boissier MC Immune responses to gene therapy vectors: influence on vector function and effector mechanisms Gene Ther 2004 11 Suppl 1 S10 17 10.1038/sj.gt.3302364 15454952 Bessis N, GarciaCozar FJ, Boissier MC. Immune responses to gene therapy vectors: influence on vector function and effector mechanisms. Gene Ther. 2004;11(Suppl 1):S10–17. 15454952 10.1038/sj.gt.3302364
79. Robbins M Judge A MacLachlan I SiRNA and innate immunity Oligonucleotides 2009 19 2 89 102 10.1089/oli.2009.0180 19441890 Robbins M, Judge A, MacLachlan I. SiRNA and innate immunity. Oligonucleotides. 2009;19(2):89–102. 19441890 10.1089/oli.2009.0180
80. Szebeni J Complement activation-related pseudoallergy: a new class of drug-induced acute immune toxicity Toxicology 2005 216 2–3 106 21 10.1016/j.tox.2005.07.023 16140450 Szebeni J. Complement activation-related pseudoallergy: a new class of drug-induced acute immune toxicity. Toxicology. 2005;216(2–3):106–21. 16140450 10.1016/j.tox.2005.07.023
81. Bartlett DW Su H Hildebrandt IJ Weber WA Davis ME Impact of tumor-specific targeting on the biodistribution and efficacy of SiRNA nanoparticles measured by multimodality in vivo imaging Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007 104 39 15549 54 10.1073/pnas.0707461104 17875985 PMC1978218 Bartlett DW, Su H, Hildebrandt IJ, Weber WA, Davis ME. Impact of tumor-specific targeting on the biodistribution and efficacy of SiRNA nanoparticles measured by multimodality in vivo imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(39):15549–54. 17875985 10.1073/pnas.0707461104 PMC1978218
82. Alsaleh NB Brown JM Immune responses to engineered nanomaterials: current Understanding and challenges Curr Opin Toxicol 2018 10 8 14 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.11.011 29577105 PMC5863933 Alsaleh NB, Brown JM. Immune responses to engineered nanomaterials: current Understanding and challenges. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2018;10:8–14. 29577105 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.11.011 PMC5863933
83. Lam JK Chow MY Zhang Y Leung SW SiRNA versus MiRNA as therapeutics for gene Silencing Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2015 4 9 e252 10.1038/mtna.2015.23 26372022 PMC4877448 Lam JK, Chow MY, Zhang Y, Leung SW. SiRNA versus MiRNA as therapeutics for gene Silencing. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2015;4(9):e252. 26372022 10.1038/mtna.2015.23 PMC4877448
84. Bader AG Brown D Winkler M The promise of MicroRNA replacement therapy Cancer Res 2010 70 18 7027 30 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2010 20807816 PMC2940943 Bader AG, Brown D, Winkler M. The promise of MicroRNA replacement therapy. Cancer Res. 2010;70(18):7027–30. 20807816 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2010 PMC2940943
85. Robbins PD Ghivizzani SC Viral vectors for gene therapy Pharmacol Ther 1998 80 1 35 47 10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00020-5 9804053 Robbins PD, Ghivizzani SC. Viral vectors for gene therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 1998;80(1):35–47. 9804053
86. Mitragotri S Burke PA Langer R Overcoming the challenges in administering biopharmaceuticals: formulation and delivery strategies Nat Rev Drug Discov 2014 13 9 655 72 10.1038/nrd4363 25103255 PMC4455970 Mitragotri S, Burke PA, Langer R. Overcoming the challenges in administering biopharmaceuticals: formulation and delivery strategies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13(9):655–72. 25103255 10.1038/nrd4363 PMC4455970
87. Lee SWL Paoletti C Campisi M Osaki T Adriani G Kamm RD Mattu C Chiono V MicroRNA delivery through nanoparticles J Control Release 2019 313 80 95 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.007 31622695 PMC6900258 Lee SWL, Paoletti C, Campisi M, Osaki T, Adriani G, Kamm RD, Mattu C, Chiono V. MicroRNA delivery through nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2019;313:80–95. 31622695 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.007 PMC6900258
88. van Rooij E Kauppinen S Development of MicroRNA therapeutics is coming of age EMBO Mol Med 2014 6 7 851 64 10.15252/emmm.201100899 24935956 PMC4119351 van Rooij E, Kauppinen S. Development of MicroRNA therapeutics is coming of age. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6(7):851–64. 24935956 10.15252/emmm.201100899 PMC4119351
89. Zhu Y Zhu L Wang X Jin H RNA-based therapeutics: an overview and prospectus Cell Death Dis 2022 13 7 644 10.1038/s41419-022-05075-2 35871216 PMC9308039 Zhu Y, Zhu L, Wang X, Jin H. RNA-based therapeutics: an overview and prospectus. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(7):644. 35871216 10.1038/s41419-022-05075-2 PMC9308039
90. Zhang C Zhang B RNA therapeutics: updates and future potential Sci China Life Sci 2023 66 1 12 30 10.1007/s11427-022-2171-2 36100838 PMC9470505 Zhang C, Zhang B. RNA therapeutics: updates and future potential. Sci China Life Sci. 2023;66(1):12–30. 36100838 10.1007/s11427-022-2171-2 PMC9470505
91. Chen Y Gao DY Huang L In vivo delivery of MiRNAs for cancer therapy: challenges and strategies Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015 81 128 41 10.1016/j.addr.2014.05.009 24859533 PMC5009470 Chen Y, Gao DY, Huang L. In vivo delivery of MiRNAs for cancer therapy: challenges and strategies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;81:128–41. 24859533 10.1016/j.addr.2014.05.009 PMC5009470
92. Beg MS Brenner AJ Sachdev J Borad M Kang YK Stoudemire J Smith S Bader AG Kim S Hong DS Phase I study of MRX34, a liposomal miR-34a mimic, administered twice weekly in patients with advanced solid tumors Invest New Drugs 2017 35 2 180 8 10.1007/s10637-016-0407-y 27917453 PMC5893501 Beg MS, Brenner AJ, Sachdev J, Borad M, Kang YK, Stoudemire J, Smith S, Bader AG, Kim S, Hong DS. Phase I study of MRX34, a liposomal miR-34a mimic, administered twice weekly in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2017;35(2):180–8. 27917453 10.1007/s10637-016-0407-y PMC5893501
93. Hong DS Kang YK Borad M Sachdev J Ejadi S Lim HY Brenner AJ Park K Lee JL Kim TY Phase 1 study of MRX34, a liposomal miR-34a mimic, in patients with advanced solid tumours Br J Cancer 2020 122 11 1630 7 10.1038/s41416-020-0802-1 32238921 PMC7251107 Hong DS, Kang YK, Borad M, Sachdev J, Ejadi S, Lim HY, Brenner AJ, Park K, Lee JL, Kim TY, et al. Phase 1 study of MRX34, a liposomal miR-34a mimic, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(11):1630–7. 32238921 10.1038/s41416-020-0802-1 PMC7251107
94. van Zandwijk N Pavlakis N Kao SC Linton A Boyer MJ Clarke S Huynh Y Chrzanowska A Fulham MJ Bailey DL Safety and activity of microRNA-loaded minicells in patients with recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma: a first-in-man, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study Lancet Oncol 2017 18 10 1386 96 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30621-6 28870611 van Zandwijk N, Pavlakis N, Kao SC, Linton A, Boyer MJ, Clarke S, Huynh Y, Chrzanowska A, Fulham MJ, Bailey DL, et al. Safety and activity of microRNA-loaded minicells in patients with recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma: a first-in-man, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1386–96. 28870611 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30621-6
95. Duurland CL Gunst T Boer HCD Bosch M Telford BJ Vos RM Xie X Zang M Wang F Shao Y INT-1B3, an LNP formulated miR-193a-3p mimic, promotes anti-tumor immunity by enhancing T cell mediated immune responses via modulation of the tumor microenvironment and induction of Immunogenic cell death Oncotarget 2024 15 470 85 10.18632/oncotarget.28608 39007281 PMC11247534 Duurland CL, Gunst T, Boer HCD, Bosch M, Telford BJ, Vos RM, Xie X, Zang M, Wang F, Shao Y, et al. INT-1B3, an LNP formulated miR-193a-3p mimic, promotes anti-tumor immunity by enhancing T cell mediated immune responses via modulation of the tumor microenvironment and induction of Immunogenic cell death. Oncotarget. 2024;15:470–85. 39007281 10.18632/oncotarget.28608 PMC11247534
96. Issa H Bhayadia R Winkler R Swart LE Heckl D Klusmann JH Preclinical testing of miRNA-193b-3p mimic in acute myeloid leukemias Leukemia 2023 37 7 1583 7 10.1038/s41375-023-01937-6 37311946 PMC10317836 Issa H, Bhayadia R, Winkler R, Swart LE, Heckl D, Klusmann JH. Preclinical testing of miRNA-193b-3p mimic in acute myeloid leukemias. Leukemia. 2023;37(7):1583–7. 37311946 10.1038/s41375-023-01937-6 PMC10317836
97. Seto AG Beatty X Lynch JM Hermreck M Tetzlaff M Duvic M Jackson AL Cobomarsen, an oligonucleotide inhibitor of miR-155, co-ordinately regulates multiple survival pathways to reduce cellular proliferation and survival in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma Br J Haematol 2018 183 3 428 44 10.1111/bjh.15547 30125933 Seto AG, Beatty X, Lynch JM, Hermreck M, Tetzlaff M, Duvic M, Jackson AL. Cobomarsen, an oligonucleotide inhibitor of miR-155, co-ordinately regulates multiple survival pathways to reduce cellular proliferation and survival in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(3):428–44. 30125933 10.1111/bjh.15547
98. Anastasiadou E Seto AG Beatty X Hermreck M Gilles ME Stroopinsky D Pinter-Brown LC Pestano L Marchese C Avigan D Cobomarsen, an oligonucleotide inhibitor of miR-155, slows DLBCL tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo Clin Cancer Res 2021 27 4 1139 49 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3139 33208342 PMC8287597 Anastasiadou E, Seto AG, Beatty X, Hermreck M, Gilles ME, Stroopinsky D, Pinter-Brown LC, Pestano L, Marchese C, Avigan D, et al. Cobomarsen, an oligonucleotide inhibitor of miR-155, slows DLBCL tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(4):1139–49. 33208342 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3139 PMC8287597
99. Gale DP Gross O Wang F Esteban de la Rosa RJ Hall M Sayer JA Appel G Hariri A Liu S Maski M A randomized controlled clinical trial testing effects of Lademirsen on kidney function decline in adults with Alport syndrome Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024 19 8 995 1004 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000458 38829703 PMC11321738 Gale DP, Gross O, Wang F, Esteban de la Rosa RJ, Hall M, Sayer JA, Appel G, Hariri A, Liu S, Maski M, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial testing effects of Lademirsen on kidney function decline in adults with Alport syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024;19(8):995–1004. 38829703 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000458 PMC11321738
100. Soureas K Malandrakis P Papadimitriou MA Minopoulos C Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I Liacos CI Gavriatopoulou M Kastritis E Dimopoulos MA Scorilas A Refining precision prognostics in multiple myeloma: loss of miR-221/222 cluster in CD138 + plasma cells results in short-term progression and worse treatment outcome Blood Cancer J 2025 15 1 41 10.1038/s41408-025-01248-2 40089465 PMC11910569 Soureas K, Malandrakis P, Papadimitriou MA, Minopoulos C, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Liacos CI, Gavriatopoulou M, Kastritis E, Dimopoulos MA, Scorilas A, et al. Refining precision prognostics in multiple myeloma: loss of miR-221/222 cluster in CD138 + plasma cells results in short-term progression and worse treatment outcome. Blood Cancer J. 2025;15(1):41. 40089465 10.1038/s41408-025-01248-2 PMC11910569