IVF patient subgroups benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a prospective multicentre cohort study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improve the ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer and reduce miscarriage rate in patients with advanced maternal age (AMA), recurrent implantation failure (RIF), recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), or both, without affecting cumulative pregnancy rate?

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of 260 patients undergoing PGT-A aged 36 years or over (AMA group), with a history of three or more blastocyst transfers without birth (RIF group), two or more early pregnancy losses (RPL group), or all. Trophectoderm biopsy was conducted day 5 or 6, and comprehensive chromosome screening was used for PGT-A before single frozen embryo transfer (PGT-A-FET). A total of 3060 patients undergoing single conventional frozen embryo transfer (FET) served as a historical reference group.

RESULTS

Patients had increased odds of positive serum beta-HCG after PGT-A-FET compared with FET in the AMA (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.21) and RIF (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.14) groups. The PGT-A-FET group significantly improved the odds of ongoing pregnancy in the AMA (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.18), RIF (OR 3.96, 95% CI 2.60 to 6.04) and RPL (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.52 to 5.21) groups. The odds of pregnancy loss were significantly reduced with PGT-A-FET in the AMA (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.64), RIF (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.26) and RPL (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.53) groups. Cumulative pregnancy rate did not differ between PGT-A and conventional cycles (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.10).

CONCLUSIONS

PGT-A improved the odds of ongoing pregnancy and reduced the odds of pregnancy loss in all groups. The cumulative pregnancy rate did not differ between PGT-A and conventional cycles. Findings should be interpreted in the context of the observational design.