Introduction
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the management of hematologic malignancies, providing durable responses even in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. 1 , 2 , 3 However, significant challenges with CAR-T-cell therapy include the risk of life-threatening toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, the requirement for individualized, cumbersome cell manufacturing, and substantial costs with autologous generation, limiting accessibility and the feasibility of this therapeutic strategy. 4 , 5 Additionally, the autologous derivation of CAR-T cells from heavily pretreated patients may compromise product quality and quantity. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 Ultimately, the complex logistics of generating autologous CAR-T cells impede timely deployment for many patients in need. 10
In contrast, natural killer (NK) cells, which are innate immune effector cells, offer specific immunotherapeutic advantages. 11 NK cells rapidly identify and kill malignant or virally infected cells without previous sensitization through a diverse array of activating and inhibitory receptors on target cells. 12 They recognize missing-self signals on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I–negative targets, release cytotoxic granules containing perforin and granzyme B (GZMB) to induce apoptosis, and mediate both direct cytolytic and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). 13 Their inherent antitumor functionality, suitability for allogeneic use without risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and lower risk of cytokine storm position them as a viable platform for cell therapy. 11 CAR-NK cells combine innate cytotoxic functions of NK cells with CAR-driven specificity, addressing several limitations of CAR T-cell therapy. 14 CAR-NK cells can be generated from diverse sources, enabling “off-the-shelf” allogeneic therapies. 5 Although investigation is underway to generate allogeneic, off-the-shelf CAR-T cells with genetic modifications to reduce GVHD risk, this often disrupts the T-cell receptor, compromising CAR-T-cell quality and their intrinsic T-cell functionality. 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 This is avoided with CAR-NK cells, which do not require such genetic engineering for allogeneic implementation. Early trials, including our group’s phase 1/2 study of umbilical cord blood (CB)-derived CD19-targeting CAR-NK cells for relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies, have shown promising efficacy and safety with NK cell persistence for >1 year. 19 , 20 , 21
Despite their potential, CAR-NK cell therapy is challenged by limited persistence, immunosuppression by tumor cells, and metabolic constraints. 4 , 5 , 11 , 22 This review examines engineering and manufacturing strategies, addresses biological and tumor-specific barriers, and highlights emerging preclinical and clinical advances optimizing the therapeutic potential of CAR-NK cells.
CAR-NK cell manufacturing
CAR-NK cells can be generated from various sources, including CB, peripheral blood (PB), NK cell lines, and pluripotent stem cells (PSCs; Figure 1 ). Each source has distinct benefits and limitations, influencing the efficacy and phenotype of derived CAR-NK cells ( Table 1 ). Expansion and cryopreservation considerations are key for scalable CAR-NK cell therapeutic application. Finally, the design and delivery of CAR constructs for NK cells involve tailoring intracellular signaling motifs, vector elements, or selecting gene delivery approaches, which all affect efficiency, safety, and therapeutic durability. Figure 1. Derivation and application of CAR-NK cell therapy. CAR-NK cells can be produced from multiple sources, such as PBMCs and CB from which NK cells are isolated, PSCs differentiated into NK cells, or the NK-92 cell line established from a patients with NHL and requiring irradiation before clinical application. Introduction of the CAR transgene into NK cells can be achieved through retroviral or lentiviral transduction, mRNA electroporation, or transposon systems, with additional genetic modifications, such as CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing, possible during this process. After expansion, CAR-NK cells are cryopreserved to create good manufacturing practice–compliant, off-the-shelf cell therapy banks for clinical use. PBMCs, PB mononuclear cells; QC, quality control. Figure created with biorender.com . Manzar GS. (2026) https://BioRender.com/ao35jjm . Table 1. Comparison of cell origins that can be utilized to derive CAR-NK cells PBMCs CB NK-92 cells PSCs Availability Readily available, autologous or allogeneic donors Banked units widely available, 1 unit can treat multiple patients Established master cell banks; unlimited supply Potentially unlimited supply Variability High donor-to-donor variability Moderate donor variability mitigated with CB unit selection Minimal variability Low variability with standardized cell lines Risk of tumorigenicity Very low Very low Requires irradiation to prevent malignant proliferation Theoretical risk from reprogramming/genetic instability and undifferentiated cells Expandability Low NK frequency; requires robust ex vivo expansion High proliferative capacity supporting large-scale expansion Rapid and efficient clinical expansion to clinical scale High expansion potential Maturity or phenotype Mature NK phenotype Relatively immature but highly proliferative with good persistence Activated phenotype, potent cytotoxicity Often immature phenotype, low CD16 and KIR expression Transduction efficiency Generally low, requires optimization Moderate to high genetic engineering efficiency High genetic engineering efficiency Highly amenable to precise genetic engineering In vivo persistence Variable, may be limited by exhaustion and host rejection Favorable persistence seen clinically Limited persistence due to mandatory irradiation Limited persistence seen clinically, under investigation Off-the-shelf feasibility Limited, autologous manufacturing frequent Strong Strong Strong Clinical experience Early-to-intermediate clinical evaluation; fewer trials compared with CB-based products Most advanced clinical experience with demonstrated safety and efficacy in phase 1 trials Multiple phase 1 trials showing safety and transient efficacy with limited persistence Early clinical translation; limited but emerging clinical experience Notable issues Self-MHC inhibition (autologous); donor variability; expansion challenges Donor unit selection critical Requires repeated dosing; irradiation limits persistence Time- and labor-intensive derivation; regulatory and safety considerations PBMCs, CB, the NK-92 cell line, and PSCs are all potential sources for CAR-NK cell therapy. Each has unique advantages and challenges, which are highlighted in the table. KIR, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors; PBMCs, PB mononuclear cells.

Table 1.
Comparison of cell origins that can be utilized to derive CAR-NK cells
PBMCs, CB, the NK-92 cell line, and PSCs are all potential sources for CAR-NK cell therapy. Each has unique advantages and challenges, which are highlighted in the table. KIR, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors; PBMCs, PB mononuclear cells.
| PBMCs | CB | NK-92 cells | PSCs | |
| Availability | Readily available, autologous or allogeneic donors | Banked units widely available, 1 unit can treat multiple patients | Established master cell banks; unlimited supply | Potentially unlimited supply |
| Variability | High donor-to-donor variability | Moderate donor variability mitigated with CB unit selection | Minimal variability | Low variability with standardized cell lines |
| Risk of tumorigenicity | Very low | Very low | Requires irradiation to prevent malignant proliferation | Theoretical risk from reprogramming/genetic instability and undifferentiated cells |
| Expandability | Low NK frequency; requires robust ex vivo expansion | High proliferative capacity supporting large-scale expansion | Rapid and efficient clinical expansion to clinical scale | High expansion potential |
| Maturity or phenotype | Mature NK phenotype | Relatively immature but highly proliferative with good persistence | Activated phenotype, potent cytotoxicity | Often immature phenotype, low CD16 and KIR expression |
| Transduction efficiency | Generally low, requires optimization | Moderate to high genetic engineering efficiency | High genetic engineering efficiency | Highly amenable to precise genetic engineering |
| In vivo persistence | Variable, may be limited by exhaustion and host rejection | Favorable persistence seen clinically | Limited persistence due to mandatory irradiation | Limited persistence seen clinically, under investigation |
| Off-the-shelf feasibility | Limited, autologous manufacturing frequent | Strong | Strong | Strong |
| Clinical experience | Early-to-intermediate clinical evaluation; fewer trials compared with CB-based products | Most advanced clinical experience with demonstrated safety and efficacy in phase 1 trials | Multiple phase 1 trials showing safety and transient efficacy with limited persistence | Early clinical translation; limited but emerging clinical experience |
| Notable issues | Self-MHC inhibition (autologous); donor variability; expansion challenges | Donor unit selection critical | Requires repeated dosing; irradiation limits persistence | Time- and labor-intensive derivation; regulatory and safety considerations |
NK cell sources
PB is a readily accessible source of mature NK cells with a short differentiation period. Autologous PB-derived NK cells carry minimal immune rejection risk but may have reduced efficacy because of self-MHC–based inhibition or suboptimal functionality due to previous treatments or health issues. 23 Allogeneic PB-derived NK cells are thus preferred and can be isolated from healthy donors to treat multiple patients but face the issue of donor-dependent variability. PB-derived NK cells require expansion due to the naturally low NK cell frequency, 24 and are challenged by lower transduction efficiency and exhaustion from prolonged activation. 25 Cytokine cocktails, feeder cells, and metabolic supplements are being optimized to enhance PB NK cell expansion and function. 26 , 27 , 28
CB provides NK cells with high proliferative capacity, supporting large-scale expansion for off-the-shelf CAR-NK therapies to treat many patients from 1 cord. 29 Current expansion methods enable the production of therapeutic-grade CAR-NK cells from CB at clinical scales, yielding robust antitumor function and durable persistence. 30 , 31 We reported the first-in-human phase 1/2 trial using CD19-CAR-NK cells derived from CB to treat R/R hematological malignancies, demonstrating strong clinical potency and an excellent safety profile, highlighting CB as a source for effective CAR-NK cell therapies. 20 As with allogeneic PB, donor variability affects CB-derived NK cells. Correlative analysis of our clinical trial identified that CB units with ≤8 × 10 7 nucleated red blood cells and a collection-to-cryopreservation time of ≤24 hour represented the strongest predictors of superior outcomes and CAR-NK cell functionality. 20 These observations emphasize the critical role of donor selection in allogeneic cell therapy development.
Derived in 1992 from the PB of a 50-year-old man with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), NK-92 is an NK cell line notable for ease of expansion to therapeutic quantities with minimal variability and can be readily engineered to express CARs. However, NK-92 cells must be irradiated before infusion to prevent uncontrolled in vivo proliferation and mitigate tumorigenic risk. Irradiated NK-92 cells were safe and showed encouraging short-term antitumor activity in clinical trials, but their limited persistence in patients may reduce long-term efficacy and necessitates multiple infusions for sustained benefit. 32 , 33 , 34
Human embryonic stem cells or induced PSCs (iPSCs) can produce large batches of CAR-NK cells with consistent properties, offering potentially unlimited expansion potential for off-the-shelf therapeutic application and reducing donor variability. Limitations include cumbersome, time-intensive, and inefficient derivation of NK cells with potential immature phenotypes evidenced by low killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors and CD16 expression. 35 The reprogramming process also introduces the risk of genetic aberrations with tumorigenic potential. 36 Nevertheless, protocol improvements continue to reveal substantial potential for stem cell–derived CAR-NK cell therapies that have translated into clinical application. 37 , 38
NK cell expansion and cryopreservation
Ex vivo expansion is essential for therapeutic application of NK cells due to their low frequency and the large quantities needed for clinical use. Various expansion strategies are used, such as cytokine supplementation; coculture with feeder cells such as modified K562 expressing membrane-bound cytokines; and feeder-free, particle-based methods. 31 These techniques support robust NK cell proliferation but require several weeks to achieve clinically relevant cell numbers. Additional challenges include optimizing gene transduction or gene editing efficiency, while sustaining proliferative capacity and NK cell viability. 39 , 40 , 41 The K562 cell line, derived from a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis, is the most commonly used feeder for NK cell expansion. Because K562 cells retain tumorigenic properties, irradiation is required before coculture, but incomplete removal can result in residual K562 cells in the final NK cell product. This necessitates stringent US Food and Drug Administration regulations to prevent feeder cell contamination in clinical-grade NK cell preparations. 42 Alternative expansion platforms, such as artificial antigen-presenting cells or feeder-free, particle-based techniques, are under investigation to enhance safety and regulatory compliance for clinical use. 39
Cryopreservation is crucial for large-scale, off-the-shelf clinical application of NK cell therapies. However, unlike T cells, which generally maintain cytotoxic function after freeze-thaw cycles, NK cells experience markedly reduced viability, recovery, and functionality after thawing, impairing their expansion, persistence, and cytotoxicity in vivo. 43 , 44 Several biological variables underlie these disparities. NK cells possess greater granularity than T cells due to abundant preformed cytotoxic granules. 45 They also express innate, germ line–encoded activating receptors that detect stress ligands (eg, MHC class I chain-related protein A/B and UL16-binding proteins) on damaged cells. 46 These features make NK cells more susceptible to apoptosis after cryopreservation, likely from cryoinjury-induced GZMB leakage or fratricide triggered by stress-induced NK cell receptor activation. 47 Overcoming cryopreservation-associated challenges are essential for effective deployment of off-the-shelf NK cell therapies.
CAR construction and expression
CARs enable immune cells to recognize and target cancer cells in an antigen-specific manner. Structurally, CARs consist of an ectodomain, which is often a single-chain variable fragment conferring antigen specificity, a hinge region providing flexibility and stability, a transmembrane domain to link extracellular and intracellular components, and intracellular signaling plus costimulatory domains that activate immune responses. 48 , 49 , 50 Once a CAR extracellular domain binds to the target antigen, the intracellular signaling domain spurs signaling cascades that stimulate NK cell cytotoxicity. The choice of domain sources affects stability, function, and persistence, and includes CD8α, CD28, or immunoglobulin for hinge and transmembrane elements, or CD3ζ, 4-1BB, or CD28 for intracellular signaling components. 50 , 51 The vector backbone that delivers CAR transgenes to NK cells contains promoters that regulate CAR expression and influence activity. Polyadenylation signals on the vector stabilize CAR mRNA and support efficient translation of the CAR protein. 52 , 53
To exploit innate NK cell signaling, CAR-NK designs may incorporate NK-specific motifs, such as DNAX-activating protein 10 (DAP10), DNAX-activating protein 12 (DAP12), 2B4/CD244, or DNAX-acessory molecule 1 (DNAM1), alongside traditional CD3ζ-based signaling, aiming to exploit NK-specific natural costimulatory mechanisms and maximize activation. 54 , 55 , 56 Studies comparing different endodomains indicate that CD28-based costimulation with CD3ζ enhances CAR-NK cytotoxicity and persistence in hematologic and solid tumor models, as opposed to NK-specific DAP10 and DAP12, or bicentric 4-1BB endodomains. 57 However, optimal costimulatory domains can vary by disease contexts and therapeutic indications.
Strategies for gene delivery in CAR-NK cell engineering
Various delivery methods can be used in CAR-NK cell production, including viral or nonviral approaches. Retroviruses integrate efficiently into dividing NK cells and have shown success in phase 1/2 clinical trials, achieving 68% progression-free survival and a favorable safety profile. 19 , 20 Of note, RD114-pseudotyped retroviruses outperform gamma retroviruses and lentiviruses in NK cell transduction. 58 , 59 Lentiviruses, which transduce both dividing and resting NK cells, often have lower transduction efficiency, limiting widespread application. 52 When pseudotyped with the baboon envelope, lentiviruses have improved transduction efficiency and promising preclinical efficacy. 60 , 61
The Sleeping Beauty transposon system involves a “cut-and-paste” approach to integrate CAR transgenes into NK cell genomes. However, because these integrations are semirandom, transposase-based methods may carry a risk of oncogenic transformation. Indeed, piggyBac transposase-engineered CAR-T cells led to malignancy in treated patients with cancer. 62 Newer methods in CAR-NK cell generation combined minicircle DNA and a Sleeping Beauty transposase system, demonstrating preferential integration into safer genomic harbors, with robust antitumor activity. 63
Finally, mRNA electroporation uses electrical pulses to transiently permeabilize NK cell membranes, introducing short-lived CAR-encoding mRNA that does not integrate in host genomes. This nonviral method enables temporary CAR expression, reducing long-term toxicity, insertional mutagenesis risk, off-tumor side effects, and regulatory burden. 64 It is especially useful for early-phase studies or when safety of a new CAR target is uncertain.
Advantages of CAR-NK cell–based therapy
CAR-NK cells present notable advantages over CAR-T cells, particularly as allogeneic products, due to their favorable safety and lower manufacturing costs, described hereafter and in Figure 2 . Figure 2. Summary of the major strengths and drawbacks of CAR-T cell therapy and CAR-NK cell therapy. Favorable features or benefits are highlighted in green checkmarks, and limitations or challenges are shaded in red crosses. KIR, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors; LDC, lymphodepleting chemotherapy; PBMCs, PB mononuclear cells; TCR, T-cell receptor; TME, tumor microenvironment. Figure created with biorender.com . Manzar GS. (2026) https://BioRender.com/nd03tji .

Scalability, allogeneic use, and cost reduction
There are active efforts looking to derive allogeneic, “off-the-shelf” CAR-T cells with deletion of the native T-cell receptor (T-cell receptor alpha constant, or TRAC, knockout) to reduce the risk of GVHD, but this further reduces CAR-T-cell quantity and quality, with compromised innate functionality due to disruption of the T-cell receptor. 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 Unlike CAR-T cells, which carry the risk of GVHD even with HLA matching, 65 NK cells do not induce GVHD, enabling safe allogeneic use even in HLA-mismatched settings. 66 If suitably cryopreserved, CAR-NK cells become a rapid, scalable, and cost-effective off-the-shelf therapy. This eliminates lengthy patient-specific manufacturing from potentially heavily pretreated patients, reduces costs, and accelerates treatment initiation in the setting of rapidly progressing disease. 67 Of note, as discussed above, cryopreservation adversely affects CAR-NK cells both in quality and quantity, which is a challenge in allogeneic, scalable, off-the-shelf use that merits continued investigation for improvement.
Favorable safety profile
CAR-T-cell therapy can cause severe toxicities such as CRS and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), leading to prolonged hospitalization and high costs. The massive release of proinflammatory “cytokine storm” by activated effector cells results in systemic inflammation that drive high fever, hypotension, hypoxia, and multiorgan dysfunction. Severe CRS (grade ≥3) occurs in up to 30% of patients receiving CAR-T-cell therapy, with rates varying by CAR design and disease setting. 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ICANS manifests in up to 50% of patients after CAR-T-cell therapy. 68 , 70 Recent findings also describe atypical neurotoxicities, such as parkinsonism and movement disorders, in patients with multiple myeloma after CAR-T-cell therapy, implicating possible off-tumor effects on the basal ganglia or alternative neuroinflammatory pathways beyond classical ICANS. 72 , 73 In contrast, CAR-NK cell therapy in early trials have not shown grade ≥3 CRS or neurotoxicity, with most side effects limited to manageable cytopenias, grade ≤2 CRS, or mild infusion reactions. 19 , 20 , 34 , 38 The favorable side effect profile of CAR-NK cells may be due to their lower persistence and cytokine release but, for now, still underscores the superior safety profile of CAR-NK cells.
Dual innate and CAR-mediated antitumor function
NK cells possess innate germ line–encoded activating receptors such as NKG2D, NKp46, NKp30, NKp44, NKG2C, DNAM-1, and CD16, allowing them to kill malignant cells by both natural cytotoxicity and ADCC. CAR-NK cells combine engineered and innate mechanisms for cytotoxicity, without a need for previous sensitization, potentially limiting antigen escape in heterogenous tumors. 74
Challenges with CAR-NK cell therapy
Despite showing promise against hematologic malignancies, 19 , 38 CAR-NK cells face several important limitations. Opportunities for progress include boosting expansion, enhancing persistence, and improving resistance to exhaustion. 75
Limited persistence
Unmodified NK cells have a natural life span of ∼2 weeks and generally fail to persist or expand in vivo unless sustained by endogenous cytokines. 75 Genetic engineering to induce cytokine armoring such as with interleukin-15 (IL-15) 75 or IL-21 76 in NK cells improves persistence and long-term function and has been successful in clinical trials. 19 Still, tumor-derived immunosuppressive factors can accelerate NK apoptosis, and chronic activation by tumor exposure can drive exhaustion and activation-induced cell death.
Metabolic and nutrient constraints
Tumors rapidly consume glucose, amino acids, and lipids, depriving NK cells of critical nutrients needed for their metabolism, survival, and cytotoxicity. 77 Immunosuppressive byproducts prostaglandin E2 and lactic acid disrupt key NK signaling pathways, including in distant metastases from patients. 78 , 79 In tissue biopsies containing human colorectal cancer metastasis–resident NK cells, lactate induces apoptosis through acidification and mitochondrial dysfunction. 80 Overcoming these constraints is a focus of research aiming to enhance NK cell fitness and resilience.
Immunosuppressive cells and biochemical factors
Regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and M2 tumor-associated macrophages secrete immunosuppressive cytokines including prostaglandin E2, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), and IL-10, which inhibit NK function. 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 TGF-β blocks mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, and dampens NK cell glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, inducing NK cell metabolic dysfunction in metastatic breast cancer and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 Both TGF-β and IL-10 reduce expression of key activation receptors such as CD16 and NKG2D. 89 Our group described how AML blasts exhaust NK cells in a cell-cell contact–dependent manner through the TGF-β/SMAD/basic leucine zipper ATF-like transcription factor axis, driving epigenetic scaring of NK cells. 88 MDSCs inhibit NK cell function by downregulating NKG2D, and CD3ζ, a key subunit of the NK-activating receptors NKp46, NKp30, and CD16. 90 , 91 Regulatory T cells, M2 tumor-associated macrophages, and MDSCs also impair NK cell degranulation and IFN-γ secretion in a contact-dependent manner. 81 , 82 , 84
NK cell memory
Unlike T cells, the memory state in NK cells is poorly defined, particularly in the context of cancer. Although NK cell memory subsets have been described during viral infections or toxic exposures, cancer-provoked memory is limited and often manifests as transient hyperactivation rather than long-lived antigen-specific persistence capable of surveillance and clonal expansion that occurs in T cells. 92 Protocols using cytokines such as IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 can create memory-like NK cells and improve long-term cytotoxicity, but their efficacy varies by tumor type, and recurrence remains a problem. 92 , 93
Challenges in target selection
Selecting tumor-specific antigens is a major challenge because evolving tumors can mutate, downregulate, or lose antigens, causing immune escape and heterogeneity. CAR-NK cells, with both direct CAR-targeted killing and intrinsic cytotoxicity, may partially overcome this, but antigen escape remains a hurdle.
CAR-NK cells also conversely risk attacking normal tissues expressing the target antigen, termed “on-target, off-tumor” effects. Tumor-specific antigens that are expressed only on cancer cells are preferred, but tumor-associated antigens are common and may be expressed on normal cells at lower levels. Even with tumor-specific antigens, fratricide can occur via trogocytosis, which is when NK cells acquire antigen from target cells, leading to self-recognition and NK cell death. 94 Our group described the prevention of trogocytosis-mediated fratricide by engineering NK cells with a logic-gated dual-CAR system, in which 1 CAR activates upon binding a tumor-specific antigen, and a second CAR delivers an inhibitory signal upon recognizing an NK self-antigen. 94
Preclinical approaches to improve CAR-NK cell function
Modern preclinical research on CAR-NK cells focuses on enhancing persistence, potency, and safety by reprogramming cell metabolism, engineering cytokine support, suppressing inhibitory signals, exploring combinatorial strategies, creating multispecific or tandem CARs, and incorporating safety switches.
Targeting metabolic checkpoints
NK cell metabolism is pivotal for their antitumor activity. mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) is a crucial metabolic regulator, necessary for producing effector molecules such as IFN-γ and GZMB, and supporting NK cell maturation. 95 , 96 Amino acid transporters such as SLC1A5 and SLC7A5 activate metabolic regulators such as mTORC1 and c-Myc, which drive NK cell growth and function. 97 CISH encodes cytokine-inducible Src homology 2, a protein that inhibits IL-15 and IL-2 signaling in NK cells. 67 , 98 , 99 Our group demonstrated that CRISPR–associated protein 9–mediated deletion of CISH removes cytokine signaling brakes, boosts protein kinase B/mTORC1 and c-MYC signaling, enhances metabolic fitness, and increases CAR-NK cytotoxicity, especially in IL-15–secreting CAR-NK cells. 100 Recently, we identified that the transcription factor cyclic AMP response element modulator restricts key effector genes in NK cells and serves as a transcriptional checkpoint in NK cell stimulation. 101 Deleting the cyclic AMP response element modulator improves chromatin accessibility, proliferation, glycolytic capacity, and antitumor activity. Additionally, the transcription factor sterol regulatory element-binding protein supports cytokine-induced metabolic reprogramming to enhance NK function. 102 Thus, metabolic bottlenecks can be targeted to enhance the potency and resilience of CAR-NK cells.
Boosting persistence and expansion with embedded cytokine support
A key challenge is CAR-NK cell persistence in vivo, because NK cells are naturally short-lived and require cytokines for survival after infusion. Initially, systemic infusions of exogenous cytokines, such as IL-2 and IL-15, were used to enhance NK cell expansion and survival, but adverse effects such as capillary leak syndrome have limited this strategy. 22 , 103 An approach that has shown feasibility in the clinic is implementing CAR constructs with embedded proinflammatory cytokine support to improve their persistence and antitumor function. IL-15 armoring produces NK cells with notable efficacy and prolonged persistence of up to a year in responder recipients, even in HLA-mismatched settings. 19 , 75 IL-15 armored CAR-NK cell function is further enhanced with deletion of the checkpoint CISH , as described earlier. 100 CAR-NK cells engineered with expression of IL-12 show improved metabolic fitness and antitumor activity. 104 We also reported that NK cells armored with IL-21 demonstrate superior persistence and durable in vivo efficacy against human glioblastoma xenografts in mice. 76
Memory-like NK cells can be induced by exposure to IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18, yielding NK cells that persist longer and have greater antitumor potency. 92 , 105 Synergy between the memory-like phenotype and CARs has been demonstrated, with CD19-CAR memory-like NK cells exhibiting superior survival, proliferation, and cytotoxicity in vivo against NK-resistant lymphoma in NSG murine models, compared with unmodified memory-like NK cells. 93
Gene editing approaches to boost potency and curb inhibition
Tumors may use suppressive elements, such as TGF-β, which curtails cytokine secretion and NK metabolic fitness by inhibiting mTOR pathways, leading to reduced efficacy. 67 , 86 , 87 Knockout of TGFBR2 in CAR-NK cells, prevents TGF-β1–mediated NK cell dysfunction in B acute lymphoblastic leukemia and glioblastoma models. 106 , 107 Tumors also upregulate ligands for inhibitory NK cell receptors, such as NKG2A, T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domains (TIGIT), and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM3), curbing NK cell activation. Disrupting these inhibitory signals by knockdown or pharmacologic blockade prevents NK cell dysfunction. 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 NKG2A knockout enhanced the potency of anti-CD33 CAR-NK cells.
Combination therapies
CAR-NK cells can be combined with checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies to improve efficacy.
Checkpoint inhibition
Antibodies that block NK inhibitory receptors can synergize with CAR-NK treatment by preventing dysfunction and boosting antitumor immunity in both NK cells and T cells. 113 , 114 Pharmacological checkpoint inhibitors allow greater flexibility than genetic alterations, permitting titratable and temporally controlled immune enhancement.
Chemotherapy
Besides their own cytotoxicity, standard chemotherapies can sensitize tumor cells by upregulating activating ligands and increasing susceptibility to CAR-NK cell killing. 115 Cisplatin did not impair the viability and function of anti-CD133 CAR-NK-92 cells but increased their antitumor potency. 116
Targeted therapy
Preclinical research in lung and colon cancer demonstrated that agents such as kinase inhibitors (eg, regorafenib), proteasome inhibitors, and stimulator of interferon genes agonists (eg, rocaglamide) can synergize with CAR-NK therapy by increasing NK cell infiltration, activation, and tumor control. 117 , 118
Multispecific and tandem CARs to target multiple tumor antigens
A hurdle is the identification of tumor antigens with high specificity and stable expression, because heterogeneity or antigen loss enable immune escape and off-target effects introduce toxicity. Dual or multispecific CARs, designed to target >1 antigen simultaneously, address antigen escape and can help minimize off-target effects. For example, CAR-NK cells expressing both anti-CD19 CAR and high-affinity CD16–mediated ADCC when combined with monoclonal antibodies, preferentially targeting tumor cells, and surmounting antigen loss and tumor heterogeneity in B-cell malignancies, mediating superior preclinical outcomes. 74 Clinically, the ability to leverage ADCC to boost adoptive NK cell therapy was recently validated in our phase 1 trial, in which CB-derived NK cells were administered alongside a bispecific innate cell engager targeting CD16 on NK cells and CD30 on tumor cells. The combination yielded a 92.9% overall response rate (ORR) and a 66.7% complete response (CR) rate in patients with R/R CD30 + lymphoma. 119
Given the risk for on-target, off-tumor toxicity, CAR constructs are now being designed with suicide switches such as inducible caspase 9 used by our group to allow selective elimination of CAR-NK cells with AP1903 (rimiducid) in cases of severe toxicity. 30
Clinical experience of CAR-NK cells in hematological malignancies
Worldwide, the number of CAR-NK cell clinical trials is growing. A search on clinicaltrials.gov for “CAR-NK cells” identifies 123 trials, most of which are phase 1 or early phase 1, with select phase 1/2 trials. Fifteen trials focus on autoimmune diseases, 1 targets COVID-19, and 38 trials focus on solid tumors, but most anticancer CAR-NK trials address hematological malignancies, with 69 total. Four of these have completed accrual, of which 3 have published outcomes on CD19-targeted CAR-NK cells, cited in various earlier sections. 19 , 21 , 38
Our initial experience reported outcomes in 11 heavily pretreated patients with heterogenous R/R hematological malignancies treated with CB-derived IL-15 armored CD19-CAR-NK cells. We demonstrated 7 CRs and 1 partial response within 30 days, with persistence of CAR-NK cells for up to 1 year, even with HLA mismatch. 19 Our follow-up study in 37 heavily pretreated patients revealed an ORR of 48.6% at both day 30 and day 100, with CR rates of 27% (day 30) and 29.7% (day 100), and a 1-year CR rate of 37.8%. 20 The 1-year CR rate was highest in low-grade NHL at 83% and lower for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with or without Richter transformation (20% and 50%, respectively) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 29%). Responses were generally rapid and durable, with most early CRs persisting at 6 months. Patients achieving day-30 CR had a 70% chance of maintaining CR at 1 year. Correlative analysis showed that CB units with ≤8 × 10 7 nucleated red blood cells and a collection-to-cryopreservation interval of ≤24 hours strongly associated with favorable outcomes, underscoring the importance of donor selection. 20
Another clinical trial of FT596, an off-the-shelf iPSC-derived CD19-CAR-NK cell product engineered with IL-15, given without (n = 18) or with (n = 68) rituximab showed similarly high response rates and safety but lower persistence of the NK cells. 38 Among 86 heavily pretreated patients, the CR rate and ORR were 85% and 100%, respectively, for follicular lymphoma, and 25% and 38%, respectively, for LBCLs. Patients with de novo DLBCL had a low CR rate of 5%, but exclusion of these patients from the LBCL group improved the CR rate and ORR to 64% and 82%, respectively. Of note, 20 patients in this trial received previous CAR-T-cell therapy, and the ORR was 45%, with 30% CR among these patients. Persistence of CAR-NK cells was limited to 15 days, but response once achieved was durable. Of note, cryopreservation of CAR-NK cells was implemented in this trial, unlike our trial, which we deployed before optimizing patented cryopreservation techniques.
A third phase 1 trial from China was recently published in which 8 patients with R/R LBCL received a 3-dose regimen of freshly generated CB-derived CD19-CAR-NK cells equipped with 4-1BB and CD3ζ signaling endodomains. 21 The ORR was 62.5%, with a CR rate of 50%. Three patients had durable CR past 1 year, and 1 patient had durable CR beyond 2 years. CAR-NK cell persistence correlated with response, with 1 patient with CR showing CAR copies detectable by quantitative polymerase chain reaction at 15 months after infusion, and another patient with partial response harboring CAR copies at 3 months. The lack of CAR copies 2 weeks after infusion correlated with the absence of response. In addition, CAR-NK cells of patients with progressive disease showed elevated TGF-β signaling in relation to increased CBLB-mediated ubiquitination, reduced cytotoxicity, and lower antigen presentation activity.
Emerging work that is only published in abstract form includes SENTI-202-101, a PB-derived CAR-NK cell therapy with bivalent CD33 OR FLT3 NOT EMCN logic-gated system to target CD33 + or Flt3 + AML cells, while protecting normal hematopoietic progenitor cells expressing endomucin to circumvent on-target off-tumor toxicity. 120 Applied to 6 patients with AML, the authors reported no dose-limiting toxicities and transient cytopenias attributed to lymphodepleting chemotherapy, with 3 patients achieving measurable residual disease–negative CRs, and 1 patient showing complete remission with partial hematologic recovery. 120 Announced only in abstract form as well, FT522 is an iPSC-derived CD19-CAR-NK cell product genetically edited to express (1) IL-15/IL-15 receptor fusion for persistence, (2) high-affinity noncleavable CD16 Fc receptor to enhance ADCC, (3) CD38 deletion to augment mitochondrial respiratory capacity and resilience against oxidative stress, and (4) a novel alloimmune defense receptor to target 4-1BB–expressing host cells that may harm CAR-NK cells, enabling NK persistence in the allogeneic host immune system. 121 Tested in 3 patients with R/R B-cell malignancies, CRs were seen in 2 patients with low-grade follicular and marginal zone lymphomas; the third patient with DLBCL had progressive disease.
Thus, CAR-NK cell therapy holds tremendous promise against hematological malignancies, with highest efficacy seen in low-grade NHL. As the widening portfolio of trials increases, further insights into CAR-NK cell therapy are anticipated. Most of the other currently accruing trials originate in China and prioritize safety as the main end point, with secondary measures including efficacy, quality of life, and immune markers such as NK cell persistence and cytokine levels. Some studies, including with FT596, reported outpatient administration, underscoring the favorable safety profile. 38
Side effects of CAR-NK cell therapy
Thus far, clinical trials of CAR-NK cells in hematological malignancies have reported manageable side effects, such as transient cytopenias, mild infusion reactions, or grade ≤2 CRS. 19 , 21 , 34 , 38 There have been no documented cases of grade ≥3 CRS, ICANS, tumor lysis syndrome, or GVHD, complications commonly seen with CAR-T cells. Safety was the primary outcome of our trial. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy caused reversible hematological toxicity, and only 1 patient developed grade 1 CRS (2.7%). The FT596 trial described grade 1 CRS in 6% of patients receiving FT596 alone, or grade ≤2 CRS in 13% of patients receiving FT596 with rituximab. In all 3 trials, no patient developed neurotoxicity or GVHD.
In comparison, among CAR-T-cell recipients, 57% to 93% experienced grade ≥1 CRS, and 13% to 32% grade ≥3 CRS. 122 Thus, both the frequency and severity of CRS are lower in CAR-NK cell therapy. Neurotoxicity such as ICANS occurs in up to 50% of patients after CAR-T-cell therapy. 68 , 70 The favorable side effect profile of NK-based therapies is attributed to their lower persistence and cytokine release.
To further enhance safety, some CAR-NK cell products include inducible suicide genes to enable their rapid, controlled elimination if necessary. 30 Although CAR-NK cell therapy demonstrates favorable safety, ongoing patient monitoring and systematic evaluation in clinical trials remain essential.
Conclusions and future directions
CAR-NK cell therapy delivers promising safety and early efficacy in hematologic malignancies. Although still in its infancy, the future of CAR-NK cell therapy is focused on unlocking the full potential of scalable, accessible, and effective immunotherapies for solid tumors and autoimmune diseases through advancements in construct engineering and manufacturing strategies. Optimizing cryopreservation methods and logistics will ensure rapid availability, viability, and functionality of NK cells after thawing, minimizing vein-to-vein time for patients across global settings. Although manufacturing costs and affordability with cell therapies remain a major concern, in our practice, the high scalability of CB-derived NK cells, optimal expansion and cryopreservation methods, high-fidelity gene editing approaches, and streamlined enterprise-scale good manufacturing practice processes have contributed to an affordable product with which broad accessibility is feasible and financial toxicity is orders of magnitude lower than for CAR-T cells. Concomitantly, rapid progress in precise gene editing technologies, including CRISPR screening approaches, enables the generation of next-generation CAR-NK cells with enhanced cytotoxicity, metabolic resilience, and resistance to immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments. 109 The integration of CAR-NK cell therapy with other anticancer modalities is conceivable in clinical settings, and is being intensively explored in preclinical settings and some early phase clinical trials. Additionally, strategies involving multispecific, tandem, or logic gated CAR constructs capable of integrating dual-antigen sensing, combinatorial signaling, or Boolean “AND/OR” logic gating, may circumvent tumor heterogeneity and minimize off-tumor effects through precise cellular activation. Ultimately, future clinical success of CAR-NK cell therapies depends on improving persistence and potency broadly across cancers, combining scalable manufacturing, robust cryopreservation, advanced gene editing, rational combination therapies, and innovative CAR designs, together catalyzing a new era of safer, more effective, and universally accessible cellular immunotherapy.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: M.D. and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center have an institutional financial conflict of interest with Takeda Pharmaceutical for the licensing of the chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cell technology. M.D. participates on the scientific advisory board of Cellsbin, Aurigene, and Bruker Cellular Analysis. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
1 Abramson JS Palomba ML Gordon LI Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study Lancet 396 10254 2020 839 852 32888407 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31366-0
2 Locke FL Ghobadi A Jacobson CA Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial Lancet Oncol 20 1 2019 31 42 30518502 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30864-7 PMC6733402
3 Schuster SJ Tam CS Borchmann P Long-term clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas (JULIET): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study Lancet Oncol 22 10 2021 1403 1415 34516954 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00375-2
4 Sterner RC Sterner RM CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies Blood Cancer J 11 4 2021 69 33824268 10.1038/s41408-021-00459-7 PMC8024391
5 Basar R Daher M Rezvani K Next-generation cell therapies: the emerging role of CAR-NK cells Blood Adv 4 22 2020 5868 5876 33232480 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002547 PMC7686910
6 Wang Y Tong C Lu Y Characteristics of premanufacture CD8(+)T cells determine CAR-T efficacy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Signal Transduct Target Ther 8 1 2023 409 37875502 10.1038/s41392-023-01659-2 PMC10598004
7 Cuffel A Allain V Faivre L Real-world characteristics of T-cell apheresis and clinical response to tisagenlecleucel in B-cell lymphoma Blood Adv 6 15 2022 4657 4660 35728051 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007057 PMC9636323
8 Iacoboni G Navarro V Martin-Lopez AA Recent bendamustine treatment before apheresis has a negative impact on outcomes in patients with large B-cell lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy J Clin Oncol 42 2 2024 205 217 37874957 10.1200/JCO.23.01097
9 Dulobdas V Kirkwood AA Serpenti F Risk factors for CAR T-cell manufacturing failure and patient outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma: a report from the UK National CAR T Panel Blood Cancer J 15 1 2025 30 40032870 10.1038/s41408-025-01225-9 PMC11876324
10 Gajra A Zalenski A Sannareddy A Jeune-Smith Y Kapinos K Kansagra A Barriers to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies in clinical practice Pharmaceut Med 36 3 2022 163 171 35672571 10.1007/s40290-022-00428-w PMC9217916
11 Rafei H Rezvani K Advances and challenges in chimeric antigen receptor-natural killer cell immunotherapy for cancer Br J Haematol 206 2 2025 443 446 39622255 10.1111/bjh.19939 PMC11844749
12 Lanier LL Five decades of natural killer cell discovery J Exp Med 221 8 2024 e20231222 10.1084/jem.20231222 PMC11157086 38842526
13 Mace EM Human natural killer cells: form, function, and development J Allergy Clin Immunol 151 2 2023 371 385 36195172 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.09.022 PMC9905317
14 Oei VYS Siernicka M Graczyk-Jarzynka A Intrinsic functional potential of NK-cell subsets constrains retargeting driven by chimeric antigen receptors Cancer Immunol Res 6 4 2018 467 480 29459477 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0207
15 Kagoya Y Guo T Yeung B Genetic ablation of HLA class I, class II, and the T-cell receptor enables allogeneic T cells to be used for adoptive T-cell therapy Cancer Immunol Res 8 7 2020 926 936 32321775 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0508
16 Jo S Das S Williams A Endowing universal CAR T-cell with immune-evasive properties using TALEN-gene editing Nat Commun 13 1 2022 3453 35773273 10.1038/s41467-022-30896-2 PMC9247096
17 Wiebking V Lee CM Mostrel N Genome editing of donor-derived T-cells to generate allogenic chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells: optimizing alphabeta T cell-depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Haematologica 106 3 2021 847 858 32241852 10.3324/haematol.2019.233882 PMC7928014
18 Stenger D Stief TA Kaeuferle T Endogenous TCR promotes in vivo persistence of CD19-CAR-T cells compared to a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TCR knockout CAR Blood 136 12 2020 1407 1418 32483603 10.1182/blood.2020005185 PMC7612202
19 Liu E Marin D Banerjee P Use of CAR-transduced natural killer cells in CD19-positive lymphoid tumors N Engl J Med 382 6 2020 545 553 32023374 10.1056/NEJMoa1910607 PMC7101242
20 Marin D Li Y Basar R Safety, efficacy and determinants of response of allogeneic CD19-specific CAR-NK cells in CD19(+) B cell tumors: a phase 1/2 trial Nat Med 30 3 2024 772 784 38238616 10.1038/s41591-023-02785-8 PMC10957466
21 Lei W Liu H Deng W Safety and feasibility of 4-1BB co-stimulated CD19-specific CAR-NK cell therapy in refractory/relapsed large B cell lymphoma: a phase 1 trial Nat Cancer 6 5 2025 786 800 40251398 10.1038/s43018-025-00940-3 PMC12122374
22 Wang W Liu Y He Z Breakthrough of solid tumor treatment: CAR-NK immunotherapy Cell Death Discov 10 1 2024 40 38245520 10.1038/s41420-024-01815-9 PMC10799930
23 Anfossi N Andre P Guia S Human NK cell education by inhibitory receptors for MHC class I Immunity 25 2 2006 331 342 16901727 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.06.013
24 Becker PS Suck G Nowakowska P Selection and expansion of natural killer cells for NK cell-based immunotherapy Cancer Immunol Immunother 65 4 2016 477 484 26810567 10.1007/s00262-016-1792-y PMC4826432
25 Fujisaki H Kakuda H Imai C Mullighan CG Campana D Replicative potential of human natural killer cells Br J Haematol 145 5 2009 606 613 19344420 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07667.x PMC2776622
26 Denman CJ Senyukov VV Somanchi SS Membrane-bound IL-21 promotes sustained ex vivo proliferation of human natural killer cells PLoS One 7 1 2012 e30264 10.1371/journal.pone.0030264 PMC3261192 22279576
27 Lapteva N Durett AG Sun J Large-scale ex vivo expansion and characterization of natural killer cells for clinical applications Cytotherapy 14 9 2012 1131 1143 22900959 10.3109/14653249.2012.700767 PMC4787300
28 Zhang C Kadu S Xiao Y Sequential exposure to IL21 and IL15 during human natural killer cell expansion optimizes yield and function Cancer Immunol Res 11 11 2023 1524 1537 37649085 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-23-0151 PMC10618651
29 Zhao X Cai L Hu Y Wang H Cord-blood natural killer cell-based immunotherapy for cancer Front Immunol 11 2020 584099 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584099 PMC7642255 33193399
30 Liu E Tong Y Dotti G Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity Leukemia 32 2 2018 520 531 28725044 10.1038/leu.2017.226 PMC6063081
31 Liu E Ang SOT Kerbauy L GMP-compliant universal antigen presenting cells (uAPC) promote the metabolic fitness and antitumor activity of armored cord blood CAR-NK cells Front Immunol 12 2021 626098 10.3389/fimmu.2021.626098 PMC7952299 33717142
32 Gong JH Maki G Klingemann HG Characterization of a human cell line (NK-92) with phenotypical and functional characteristics of activated natural killer cells Leukemia 8 4 1994 652 658 8152260
33 Snyder KM Hullsiek R Mishra HK Expression of a recombinant high affinity IgG Fc receptor by engineered NK cells as a docking platform for therapeutic mAbs to target cancer cells Front Immunol 9 2018 2873 30574146 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02873 PMC6291448
34 Burger MC Forster MT Romanski A Intracranial injection of natural killer cells engineered with a HER2-targeted chimeric antigen receptor in patients with recurrent glioblastoma Neuro Oncol 25 11 2023 2058 2071 37148198 10.1093/neuonc/noad087 PMC10628939
35 Goldenson BH Zhu H Wang YM Umbilical cord blood and iPSC-derived natural killer cells demonstrate key differences in cytotoxic activity and KIR profiles Front Immunol 11 2020 561553 10.3389/fimmu.2020.561553 PMC7593774 33178188
36 Fu X Wu S Li B Xu Y Liu J Functions of p53 in pluripotent stem cells Protein Cell 11 1 2020 71 78 31691903 10.1007/s13238-019-00665-x PMC6949194
37 Khodayari H Khodayari S Ebrahimi E Stem cells-derived natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: current protocols, feasibility, and benefits of ex vivo generated natural killer cells in treatment of advanced solid tumors Cancer Immunol Immunother 70 12 2021 3369 3395 34218295 10.1007/s00262-021-02975-8 PMC10992832
38 Ghobadi A Bachanova V Patel K Induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cells in B-cell lymphoma: a phase 1, first-in-human trial Lancet 405 10473 2025 127 136 39798981 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02462-0 PMC11827677
39 Lapteva N Szmania SM van Rhee F Rooney CM Clinical grade purification and expansion of natural killer cells Crit Rev Oncog 19 1-2 2014 121 132 24941378 10.1615/critrevoncog.2014010931 PMC4095851
40 Maia A Tarannum M Lerias JR Building a better defense: expanding and improving natural killer cells for adoptive cell therapy Cells 13 5 2024 451 10.3390/cells13050451 PMC10930942 38474415
41 Oyer JL Croom-Perez TJ Hasan MF PM21-particle stimulation augmented with cytokines enhances NK cell expansion and confers memory-like characteristics with enhanced survival Front Immunol 15 2024 1383281 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1383281 PMC11070970 38711506
42 Fernandez A Navarro-Zapata A Escudero A Optimizing the procedure to manufacture clinical-grade NK cells for adoptive immunotherapy Cancers (Basel) 13 3 2021 577 10.3390/cancers13030577 PMC7867223 33540698
43 Mark C Czerwinski T Roessner S Cryopreservation impairs 3-D migration and cytotoxicity of natural killer cells Nat Commun 11 1 2020 5224 33067467 10.1038/s41467-020-19094-0 PMC7568558
44 Miller JS Rooney CM Curtsinger J Expansion and homing of adoptively transferred human natural killer cells in immunodeficient mice varies with product preparation and in vivo cytokine administration: implications for clinical therapy Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 20 8 2014 1252 1257 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.05.004 PMC4099265 24816582
45 Orange JS Formation and function of the lytic NK-cell immunological synapse Nat Rev Immunol 8 9 2008 713 725 19172692 10.1038/nri2381 PMC2772177
46 Ferrari de Andrade L Tay RE Pan D Antibody-mediated inhibition of MICA and MICB shedding promotes NK cell-driven tumor immunity Science 359 6383 2018 1537 1542 29599246 10.1126/science.aao0505 PMC6626532
47 Berjis A Muthumani D Aguilar OA Pretreatment with IL-15 and IL-18 rescues natural killer cells from granzyme B-mediated apoptosis after cryopreservation Nat Commun 15 1 2024 3937 38729924 10.1038/s41467-024-47574-0 PMC11087472
48 Li W Wang X Zhang X Aziz AUR Wang D CAR-NK cell therapy: a transformative approach to overcoming oncological challenges Biomolecules 14 8 2024 1035 10.3390/biom14081035 PMC11352442 39199421
49 Stoiber S Cadilha BL Benmebarek MR Lesch S Endres S Kobold S Limitations in the design of chimeric antigen receptors for cancer therapy Cells 8 5 2019 472 10.3390/cells8050472 PMC6562702 31108883
50 Rafiq S Hackett CS Brentjens RJ Engineering strategies to overcome the current roadblocks in CAR T cell therapy Nat Rev Clin Oncol 17 3 2020 147 167 31848460 10.1038/s41571-019-0297-y PMC7223338
51 Zuccolotto G Penna A Fracasso G PSMA-specific CAR-engineered T cells for prostate cancer: CD28 outperforms combined CD28-4-1BB “super-stimulation” Front Oncol 11 2021 708073 10.3389/fonc.2021.708073 PMC8511814 34660275
52 Allan DSJ Chakraborty M Waller GC Systematic improvements in lentiviral transduction of primary human natural killer cells undergoing ex vivo expansion Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 20 2021 559 571 33665226 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.01.008 PMC7890427
53 Milone MC Fish JD Carpenito C Chimeric receptors containing CD137 signal transduction domains mediate enhanced survival of T cells and increased antileukemic efficacy in vivo Mol Ther 17 8 2009 1453 1464 19384291 10.1038/mt.2009.83 PMC2805264
54 Lindner SE Johnson SM Brown CE Wang LD Chimeric antigen receptor signaling: functional consequences and design implications Sci Adv 6 21 2020 eaaz3223 10.1126/sciadv.aaz3223 PMC7314561 32637585
55 Gong Y Klein Wolterink RGJ Wang J Bos GMJ Germeraad WTV Chimeric antigen receptor natural killer (CAR-NK) cell design and engineering for cancer therapy J Hematol Oncol 14 1 2021 73 33933160 10.1186/s13045-021-01083-5 PMC8088725
56 Melo Garcia L Gangadharan A Banerjee P Overcoming CD226-related immune evasion in acute myeloid leukemia with CD38 CAR-engineered NK cells Cell Rep 44 1 2025 115122 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115122 PMC11838179 39754720
57 Acharya S Basar R Daher M CD28 costimulation augments CAR signaling in NK cells via the LCK/CD3zeta/ZAP70 signaling axis Cancer Discov 14 10 2024 1879 1900 38900051 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-0096 PMC11452288
58 Muller S Bexte T Gebel V High cytotoxic efficiency of lentivirally and alpharetrovirally engineered CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cells against acute lymphoblastic leukemia Front Immunol 10 2019 3123 32117200 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03123 PMC7025537
59 Suerth JD Morgan MA Kloess S Efficient generation of gene-modified human natural killer cells via alpharetroviral vectors J Mol Med (Berl) 94 1 2016 83 93 26300042 10.1007/s00109-015-1327-6
60 Colamartino ABL Lemieux W Bifsha P Efficient and robust NK-cell transduction with baboon envelope pseudotyped lentivector Front Immunol 10 2019 2873 31921138 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02873 PMC6927467
61 Tarannum M Dinh K Vergara J CAR memory-like NK cells targeting the membrane proximal domain of mesothelin demonstrate promising activity in ovarian cancer Sci Adv 10 28 2024 eadn0881 10.1126/sciadv.adn0881 PMC11244547 38996027
62 Bishop DC Clancy LE Simms R Development of CAR T-cell lymphoma in 2 of 10 patients effectively treated with piggyBac-modified CD19 CAR T cells Blood 138 16 2021 1504 1509 34010392 10.1182/blood.2021010813
63 Bexte T Botezatu L Miskey C Engineering of potent CAR NK cells using non-viral sleeping beauty transposition from minimalistic DNA vectors Mol Ther 32 7 2024 2357 2372 38751112 10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.05.022 PMC11287004
64 Chu Y Hochberg J Yahr A Targeting CD20+ aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma by anti-CD20 CAR mRNA-modified expanded natural killer cells in vitro and in NSG mice Cancer Immunol Res 3 4 2015 333 344 25492700 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0114
65 Han H Wang L Ding Y Extracorporeal photopheresis as a promising strategy for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease after CAR T-cell therapy Blood Adv 8 11 2024 2675 2690 38359409 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012463 PMC11170151
66 Heipertz EL Zynda ER Stav-Noraas TE Current perspectives on “off-the-shelf” allogeneic NK and CAR-NK cell therapies Front Immunol 12 2021 732135 10.3389/fimmu.2021.732135 PMC8671166 34925314
67 Daher M Rezvani K Outlook for new CAR-based therapies with a focus on CAR NK cells: what lies beyond CAR-engineered T cells in the race against cancer Cancer Discov 11 1 2021 45 58 33277313 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0556 PMC8137521
68 Brudno JN Kochenderfer JN Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: mechanisms, manifestations and management Blood Rev 34 2019 45 55 30528964 10.1016/j.blre.2018.11.002 PMC6628697
69 Xiao X Huang S Chen S Mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity of CAR T-cell therapy and associated prevention and management strategies J Exp Clin Cancer Res 40 1 2021 367 34794490 10.1186/s13046-021-02148-6 PMC8600921
70 Jain MD Smith M Shah NN How I treat refractory CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy Blood 141 20 2023 2430 2442 36989488 10.1182/blood.2022017414 PMC10329191
71 Schubert ML Schmitt M Wang L Side-effect management of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy Ann Oncol 32 1 2021 34 48 33098993 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.478
72 Van Oekelen O Aleman A Upadhyaya B Neurocognitive and hypokinetic movement disorder with features of parkinsonism after BCMA-targeting CAR-T cell therapy Nat Med 27 12 2021 2099 2103 34893771 10.1038/s41591-021-01564-7 PMC8678323
73 Ellithi M Elsallab M Lunning MA Neurotoxicity and rare adverse events in BCMA-directed CAR T cell therapy: a comprehensive analysis of real-world FAERS data Transpl Cell Ther 31 2 2025 71.e1 71.e14 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.12.002 39672542
74 Cichocki F Goodridge JP Bjordahl R Dual antigen-targeted off-the-shelf NK cells show durable response and prevent antigen escape in lymphoma and leukemia Blood 140 23 2022 2451 2462 35917442 10.1182/blood.2021015184 PMC9918847
75 Li L Mohanty V Dou J Loss of metabolic fitness drives tumor resistance after CAR-NK cell therapy and can be overcome by cytokine engineering Sci Adv 9 30 2023 eadd6997 10.1126/sciadv.add6997 PMC10371011 37494448
76 Shanley M Daher M Dou J Interleukin-21 engineering enhances NK cell activity against glioblastoma via CEBPD Cancer Cell 42 8 2024 1450 1466.e11 39137729 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.07.007 PMC11370652
77 Poznanski SM Singh K Ritchie TM Metabolic flexibility determines human NK cell functional fate in the tumor microenvironment Cell Metab 33 6 2021 1205 1220.e5 33852875 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.03.023
78 Patterson C Hazime KS Zelenay S Davis DM Prostaglandin E(2) impacts multiple stages of the natural killer cell antitumor immune response Eur J Immunol 54 2 2024 e2350635 10.1002/eji.202350635 38059519
79 Pedde AM Kim H Donakonda S Tissue-colonizing disseminated tumor cells secrete prostaglandin E2 to promote NK cell dysfunction and evade anti-metastatic immunity Cell Rep 43 11 2024 114855 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114855 39541209
80 Harmon C Robinson MW Hand F Lactate-mediated acidification of tumor microenvironment induces apoptosis of liver-resident NK cells in colorectal liver metastasis Cancer Immunol Res 7 2 2019 335 346 30563827 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0481
81 Li H Han Y Guo Q Zhang M Cao X Cancer-expanded myeloid-derived suppressor cells induce anergy of NK cells through membrane-bound TGF-beta 1 J Immunol 182 1 2009 240 249 19109155 10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.240
82 Geng X Li M Cui B CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells suppress NKG2D-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity in peripheral blood Medicine (Baltimore) 98 22 2019 e15722 10.1097/MD.0000000000015722 PMC6708973 31145286
83 Tomic S Joksimovic B Bekic M Prostaglanin-E2 potentiates the suppressive functions of human mononuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells and increases their capacity to expand IL-10-producing regulatory T cell subsets Front Immunol 10 2019 475 30936876 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00475 PMC6431635
84 Krneta T Gillgrass A Poznanski S M2-polarized and tumor-associated macrophages alter NK cell phenotype and function in a contact-dependent manner J Leukoc Biol 101 1 2017 285 295 27493241 10.1189/jlb.3A1215-552R
85 Regis S Dondero A Caliendo F Bottino C Castriconi R NK cell function regulation by TGF-beta-induced epigenetic mechanisms Front Immunol 11 2020 311 32161594 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00311 PMC7052483
86 Viel S Marcais A Guimaraes FS TGF-beta inhibits the activation and functions of NK cells by repressing the mTOR pathway Sci Signal 9 415 2016 ra19 10.1126/scisignal.aad1884 26884601
87 Slattery K Woods E Zaiatz-Bittencourt V TGFbeta drives NK cell metabolic dysfunction in human metastatic breast cancer J Immunother Cancer 9 2 2021 10.1136/jitc-2020-002044 PMC7878131 33568351
88 Kumar B Singh A Basar R BATF is a major driver of NK cell epigenetic reprogramming and dysfunction in AML Sci Transl Med 16 764 2024 eadp0004 10.1126/scitranslmed.adp0004 PMC11967735 39259809
89 Otegbeye F Ojo E Moreton S Inhibiting TGF-beta signaling preserves the function of highly activated, in vitro expanded natural killer cells in AML and colon cancer models PLoS One 13 1 2018 e0191358 10.1371/journal.pone.0191358 PMC5771627 29342200
90 Vaknin I Blinder L Wang L A common pathway mediated through Toll-like receptors leads to T- and natural killer-cell immunosuppression Blood 111 3 2008 1437 1447 17991807 10.1182/blood-2007-07-100404
91 Hoechst B Voigtlaender T Ormandy L Myeloid derived suppressor cells inhibit natural killer cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma via the NKp30 receptor Hepatology 50 3 2009 799 807 19551844 10.1002/hep.23054 PMC6357774
92 Romee R Schneider SE Leong JW Cytokine activation induces human memory-like NK cells Blood 120 24 2012 4751 4760 22983442 10.1182/blood-2012-04-419283 PMC3520618
93 Gang M Marin ND Wong P CAR-modified memory-like NK cells exhibit potent responses to NK-resistant lymphomas Blood 136 20 2020 2308 2318 32614951 10.1182/blood.2020006619 PMC7702478
94 Li Y Basar R Wang G KIR-based inhibitory CARs overcome CAR-NK cell trogocytosis-mediated fratricide and tumor escape Nat Med 28 10 2022 2133 2144 36175679 10.1038/s41591-022-02003-x PMC9942695
95 Donnelly RP Loftus RM Keating SE mTORC1-dependent metabolic reprogramming is a prerequisite for NK cell effector function J Immunol 193 9 2014 4477 4484 25261477 10.4049/jimmunol.1401558 PMC4201970
96 Marcais A Cherfils-Vicini J Viant C The metabolic checkpoint kinase mTOR is essential for IL-15 signaling during the development and activation of NK cells Nat Immunol 15 8 2014 749 757 24973821 10.1038/ni.2936 PMC4110708
97 Nachef M Ali AK Almutairi SM Lee SH Targeting SLC1A5 and SLC3A2/SLC7A5 as a potential strategy to strengthen anti-tumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment Front Immunol 12 2021 624324 10.3389/fimmu.2021.624324 PMC8089370 33953707
98 Delconte RB Kolesnik TB Dagley LF CIS is a potent checkpoint in NK cell-mediated tumor immunity Nat Immunol 17 7 2016 816 824 27213690 10.1038/ni.3470
99 Zhu H Blum RH Bernareggi D Metabolic reprograming via deletion of CISH in human iPSC-derived NK cells promotes in vivo persistence and enhances anti-tumor activity Cell Stem Cell 27 2 2020 224 237.e6 32531207 10.1016/j.stem.2020.05.008 PMC7415618
100 Daher M Basar R Gokdemir E Targeting a cytokine checkpoint enhances the fitness of armored cord blood CAR-NK cells Blood 137 5 2021 624 636 32902645 10.1182/blood.2020007748 PMC7869185
101 Rafei H Basar R Acharya S CREM is a regulatory checkpoint of CAR and IL-15 signalling in NK cells Nature 643 8073 2025 1076 1086 40468083 10.1038/s41586-025-09087-8 PMC12286855
102 Assmann N O'Brien KL Donnelly RP Srebp-controlled glucose metabolism is essential for NK cell functional responses Nat Immunol 18 11 2017 1197 1206 28920951 10.1038/ni.3838
103 Yang Y Lundqvist A Immunomodulatory effects of IL-2 and IL-15; implications for cancer immunotherapy Cancers (Basel) 12 12 2020 3586 10.3390/cancers12123586 PMC7761238 33266177
104 Jang J Stanojevic M Piccinelli S Mesothelin targeting IL12-engineered CAR memory-like NK cells demonstrate promising efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia Blood 144 suppl 1 2024 917
105 Dong H Ham JD Hu G Memory-like NK cells armed with a neoepitope-specific CAR exhibit potent activity against NPM1 mutated acute myeloid leukemia Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119 25 2022 e2122379119 10.1073/pnas.2122379119 PMC9231490 35696582
106 Shaim H Shanley M Basar R Targeting the alphav integrin/TGF-beta axis improves natural killer cell function against glioblastoma stem cells J Clin Invest 131 14 2021 e142116 10.1172/JCI142116 PMC8279586 34138753
107 Rouce RH Shaim H Sekine T The TGF-beta/SMAD pathway is an important mechanism for NK cell immune evasion in childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia Leukemia 30 4 2016 800 811 26621337 10.1038/leu.2015.327 PMC4823160
108 Kamiya T Seow SV Wong D Robinson M Campana D Blocking expression of inhibitory receptor NKG2A overcomes tumor resistance to NK cells J Clin Invest 129 5 2019 2094 2106 30860984 10.1172/JCI123955 PMC6486333
109 Biederstadt A Manzar GS Daher M Multiplexed engineering and precision gene editing in cellular immunotherapy Front Immunol 13 2022 1063303 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1063303 PMC9723254 36483551
110 Zhang Q Bi J Zheng X Blockade of the checkpoint receptor TIGIT prevents NK cell exhaustion and elicits potent anti-tumor immunity Nat Immunol 19 7 2018 723 732 29915296 10.1038/s41590-018-0132-0
111 Hasan MF Croom-Perez TJ Oyer JL TIGIT expression on activated NK cells correlates with greater anti-tumor activity but promotes functional decline upon lung cancer exposure: implications for adoptive cell therapy and TIGIT-targeted therapies Cancers (Basel) 15 10 2023 2712 10.3390/cancers15102712 PMC10216728 37345049
112 da Silva IP Gallois A Jimenez-Baranda S Reversal of NK-cell exhaustion in advanced melanoma by Tim-3 blockade Cancer Immunol Res 2 5 2014 410 422 24795354 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0171 PMC4046278
113 Jia H Yang H Xiong H Luo KQ NK cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment Front Immunol 14 2023 1303605 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1303605 PMC10653587 38022646
114 Bi J Tian Z NK cell exhaustion Front Immunol 8 2017 760 28702032 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00760 PMC5487399
115 Li J Hu H Lian K CAR-NK cells in combination therapy against cancer: a potential paradigm Heliyon 10 5 2024 e27196 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27196 PMC10937699 38486782
116 Klapdor R Wang S Hacker U Improved killing of ovarian cancer stem cells by combining a novel chimeric antigen receptor-based immunotherapy and chemotherapy Hum Gene Ther 28 10 2017 886 896 28836469 10.1089/hum.2017.168
117 Zhang Q Zhang H Ding J Combination therapy with EpCAM-CAR-NK-92 cells and regorafenib against human colorectal cancer models J Immunol Res 2018 2018 4263520 10.1155/2018/4263520 PMC6205314 30410941
118 Yan X Yao C Fang C Rocaglamide promotes the infiltration and antitumor immunity of NK cells by activating cGAS-STING signaling in non-small cell lung cancer Int J Biol Sci 18 2 2022 585 598 35002511 10.7150/ijbs.65019 PMC8741839
119 Nieto Y Banerjee P Kaur I Allogeneic NK cells with a bispecific innate cell engager in refractory relapsed lymphoma: a phase 1 trial Nat Med 31 6 2025 1987 1993 40186077 10.1038/s41591-025-03640-8 PMC13218020
120 Strickland SA Eghtedar A Farhadfar N Abstract CT014: first-in-human, multicenter study of SENTI-202, a CD33/FLT3 selective off-the-shelf logic gated CAR NK cell therapy in hematologic malignancies including AML: clinical data Cancer Res 85 8 suppl 2 2025 CT014
121 Bachanova V Deol A Al-Juhaishi TMS Safety and efficacy of FT522, a first-in-class, multi-antigen targeted, off-the-shelf, iPSC-derived CD19 CAR NK cell therapy with alloimmune defense receptor (ADR) in relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma Blood 144 suppl 1 2024 6543
122 Li Y Ming Y Fu R The pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CAR-T cell therapy-related adverse reactions Front Pharmacol 13 2022 950923 10.3389/fphar.2022.950923 PMC9616161 36313336
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the contributions of all patients and families who have participated in studies advancing the field of chimeric antigen receptor natural killer (CAR-NK) cell therapy. They thank their research collaborators and clinical partners for their dedicated efforts and technical expertise; and they also appreciate the generous support from funding agencies and philanthropic organizations, which has enabled numerous preclinical and clinical investigations in CAR-NK cell immunotherapy. Finally, they are grateful to the institutions, staff, and study coordinators that have facilitated the conduct of clinical trials and fostered an environment of innovation and excellence in cellular therapy research.
The development of this manuscript did not specifically require any funding. G.S.M. cites funding from the 10.13039/100006293 American Society of Clinical Oncology Conquer Cancer Young Investigator Award, and is supported, in part, by the K12 Calabresi Scholars Program at MD Anderson Cancer Center (5K12CA088084). M.D. is supported by an RO1 grant (National Cancer Institute R01-CA280827-01), a Leukemia Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) grant (P50CA100632), and by grants from the 10.13039/100011619 Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer , Andrew Sabin Family, and from the SPORE developmental research program in leukemia.
Authorship
Contribution: M.D. and G.S.M. supervised the creation of the review; G.S.M. rendered tables and figures; G.S.M., M.F.H., M.M., S.T., R.B., and M.D. wrote the manuscript; and all authors edited the manuscript and agree with the contents enclosed.