Introduction
Multiple myeloma (MM) is having been considered a prevalent malignant plasma cells condition, accounting for an estimated 10% of all malignancies associated with hematologic diseases and mainly in older adults. In particular, 65 years is considered the median age of diagnosing this disease, with approximately 1% accounting for people younger than the age of 65. [ 1 ] Besides, the primary resident in the bone marrow are malignant plasma cells. In others, they can be noticeable in the peripheral blood, as well as other extramedullary locations. [ 2 ] Accordingly, most patient experiencing MM denote features such secreting monoclonal immunoglobulin protein, which is generated by the nonstandard plasma cells. Nevertheless, a large pool of myeloma cells tend to secrete only monoclonal, which are uninhibited light chains in 15% to 20% of patients, as well as no monoclonal protein in only <3% of patients. [ 1 , 3 ] To this end, the clinical indicators of MM can be said to be propelled by monoclonal protein, in which malignant cells or cytokines that have been secreted by the malignant cells demonstrate signs of damage to the end-organ: they include hypercalcemia, anemia, insufficiency of renal, along with illnesses characterized by lytic lesions or compulsive ruptures, jointly referred to as CRAB characteristics. [ 4 ]
Maintenance treatment after transplantation of autologous stem cell or, in some cases, remission, is crucial for eliminating the minimal residual disease, which contributes to a prolonged survival in patients experiencing MM. [ 5 , 6 ] Presently, the main drugs used in the maintenance treatment are “glucocorticoid, interferon, immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and proteasome inhibitors”, among others. In particular, continued utilization of some of these medicines is restricted by serious adversative consequences, including change in mood, myalgia, infection, along with toxicity of hematological. [ 7 ] Accordingly, IMiDs can specifically deal with myeloma cells as well as bone marrow hematopoietic microenvironment. Thus, they play two-fold activities, including to kill tumor cells as well as helping regulation of immune. At the same time, maintenance therapies that are founded on thalidomide and lenalidomide, among other IMiDs, has the capacity of substantially causing prolonging of the progression-free survival. However, it is still constentious whether it can lead to enhancing overall survival. Although chemotherapies have been utilized broadly over the years, there are still no known role of this intervention when combined immunomodulatory therapies. [ 8 , 9 ] Therefore, the present study intends to investigate whether chemotherapy combined with immunomodulatory therapies for MM will be effective and safe.
Objective
The study aims at conducting a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy combined with immunomodulatory therapies for MM.
Methods and analysis
We will set the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols as a guide book for the protocol. [ 10 ] This systematic review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/X7DE4).
Eligibility criteria
Types of studies
RCTs comparing the effectiveness of treatment, including chemotherapy combined with immunomodulatory therapies with treatment including chemotherapy alone, IMiDs alone, another treatment, or no treatment in the treatment of MM.
Types of participants
Participants were made up of both patients who had been newly diagnosed as well as those already treated of their MM.
Types of interventions
Treatment including chemotherapy combined with immunomodulatory therapies versus treatment with chemotherapy alone, IMiDs alone, another intervention, or no intervention.
Types of outcome measures
The primary outcomes are overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate (defined as either classical response rates. The secondary outcomes are toxicities and quality of life.
Search methods for identification of studies
We will use 2 authors to search 7 specific databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and for studies on chemotherapy's efficacy and safety when it is combined with immunomodulatory therapies. The authors will consider articles published until December 16, 2021, and only those that are written in either English or Chinese languages. Additionally, the authors will search grey literature and carry out hand-searching of reference lists on all studies included, pertinent reviews, along with pertinent documents. The authors will base their search on Medical Subject Headings, which entails a wide range of terms and keywords, including “myeloma”, “immunomodulatory”, and “chemotherapy”.
Data collection and analysis
Study identification
The study will employ the utilization of EndNote V.9.0 software in collating search results and performing filtering of the results. Two independent authors will remove all the duplicates and then review all titles and abstracts of the studies identified to exclude irrelevant sections. Accordingly, after they obtain the full articles, they will re-examine them for more details. In case of any conflict during this exercise, a third author will come in to resolve the disagreement.
Data extraction and management
The authors planned on following the process of extracting data as per suitable trials. They will first consider the articles’ publication date, researches’ details such as patients’ features, sample size, and adversative events, among others. Besides, 2 authors conduct this process independently using the standard table of extracting data. In case of any conflict during this exercise, a third author will come in to resolve the disagreement.
Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Two independent authors will evaluate the standards of the literature to be included in the study by means of the Cochrane Collaboration bias risk assessment tool. The evaluation will include processes such as generating of random sequences, blinding, allocating concealments, selecting outcome reporting procedure, and so on. Accordingly, the pertinent Cochrane Intervention System Evaluation Manual will distinguish risks and low, high, or unclear.
Measures of treatment effect
The risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be employed in analyzing dichotomous data. However, the mean difference with 95% CIs will be utilized in analyzing continuous data. Similarly, the standardized mean differences with 95% CIs will be employed where there are various scales utilized in measuring some specific outcome variables. Overall, where the significant heterogeneity will be detected, the author will use the random-effects model.
Assessment of heterogeneity
To test or evaluate heterogeneity, the authors will utilize the I 2 . Where the outcome of I 2 is found to be over 50%, the authors will consider that there is a substantial heterogeneity. However, if the authors manage a descriptive statistical analysis for data synthesis and detecting the latent factors through the use of the subgroup analysis. Similarly, where the I 2 will be found to be under 50%, it will deduce that the heterogeneity is low; thus, the Chi-squared test will be employed in searching for a statistical heterogeneity.
Assessment of reporting biases
Where more than 10 studies have been included, the funnel plots will be utilized in detecting potential reporting biases. Accordingly, the authors will evaluate publication bias by establishing a funnel plot and conducting the Begg as well as Egger tests.
Sensitivity analysis
The authors will further evaluate the pooled results’ robustness by performing sensitivity analysis, by including only RCTs with a low or moderate risks of bias as well as utilizing an alternative effect model (random effects model vs fixed-effect model).
Discussion
We believe that the present systematic review will act as the first in assessing the efficacy and safety of combining chemotherapy and immunomodulatory therapies in treating MM. The results of this study demonstrates that there is a gap in literature regarding this topic. Accordingly, the review will be divided into 4 distinct parts, including identifying, inclusion of study, extracting data, and synthesis of data. In exploring effectiveness and safety, it is crucial to systematically combine existing research findings, specifically those aimed at studying its impacts on MM survival outcomes using a systematic evaluation as well as meta-analysis. This integration is likely to establish a guidance that will be critical to select treatment options for clinical maintenance.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Jie Deng, Li Liu.
Data curation: Jie Deng, Li Liu, Jianhai Sun, Yanlin Ma, Li Li.
Formal analysis: Jie Deng, Li Liu.
Funding acquisition: Li Li.
Investigation: Jie Deng, Li Liu, Jianhai Sun, Yanlin Ma.
Methodology: Li Li.
Project administration: Jie Deng, Li Liu, Jianhai Sun, Li Li.
Resources: Li Li.
Software: Jie Deng, Li Liu, Jianhai Sun, Yanlin Ma.
Supervision: Jie Deng, Jianhai Sun, Yanlin Ma.
Validation: Jie Deng, Li Liu.
Visualization: Jianhai Sun.
Writing – original draft: Jie Deng, Li Li.
Writing – review & editing: Li Li.
Abbreviations: CIs = confidence intervals, IMiDs = immunomodulatory drugs, MM = multiple myeloma, RCTs = randomized controlled trials.
How to cite this article: Deng J, Liu L, Sun J, Ma Y, Li L. Effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy combined with immunomodulatory therapies for multiple myeloma: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine . 2022;101:13(e29093).
The present study was supported by the Wuhan Health and Family Planning Commission Key Project (grant no. WX16B23).
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
[1] Kyle RA Gertz MA Witzig TE . Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma . Mayo Clin Proc 2003 ; 78 : 21 – 33 . 12528874 10.4065/78.1.21
[2] Gonsalves WI Gertz MA Gupta V . Prognostic significance of quantifying circulating plasma cells in multiple myeloma . Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2014 ; 14 : S147 .
[3] Drayson M Tang LX Drew R Mead GP Carr-Smith H Bradwell AR . Serum free light-chain measurements for identifying and monitoring patients with nonsecretory multiple myeloma . Blood 2001 ; 97 : 2900 – 2 . 11313287 10.1182/blood.v97.9.2900
[4] Rajkumar SV Dimopoulos MA Palumbo A . International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma . Lancet Oncol 2014 ; 15 : e538 – 48 . 25439696 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
[5] Rawstron AC Child JA de Tute RM . Minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry in multiple myeloma: impact on outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study . J Clin Oncol 2013 ; 31 : 2540 – 7 . 23733781 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.2119
[6] Munshi NC Avet-Loiseau H Rawstron AC . Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis . JAMA Oncol 2017 ; 3 : 28 – 35 . 27632282 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3160 PMC5943640
[7] Liu H McCarthy P . New developments in post-transplant maintenance treatment of multiple myeloma . Semin Oncol 2013 ; 40 : 602 – 9 . 24135405 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.07.008
[8] Gentile M Morabito F Martino M . Chemotherapy-based regimens in multiple myeloma in 2020 . Panminerva Med 2021 ; 63 : 7 – 12 . 32955186 10.23736/S0031-0808.20.04145-2
[9] Kumar SK Rajkumar V Kyle RA . Multiple myeloma . Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017 ; 3 : 17046 . 28726797 10.1038/nrdp.2017.46
[10] Moher D Shamseer L Clarke M . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement . Syst Rev 2015 ; 4 : 1 . 25554246 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 PMC4320440