m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
International journal of molecular sciences · 2026

BCL-2 and BCL-xL in Cancer: Regulation, Function, and Therapeutic Targeting.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Silva JPN, Pinto B, Silva PMA, Bousbaa H

Аннотация

The BCL-2 family of proteins plays a central role in the regulation of apoptosis, with BCL-2 and BCL-xL representing two of its most prominent antiapoptotic members. This review explores the molecular regulation of BCL-2 and BCL-xL genes, emphasizing the structural domains that define the functions of the broader BCL-2 family. Beyond their canonical roles in preventing mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, both proteins contribute significantly to cancer development. Their overexpression enhances invasiveness and tumor progression, supports angiogenesis, and critically modulates cellular responses to chemotherapy, often conferring drug resistance. Additional non-apoptotic functions, including roles in metabolism, mitochondrial dynamics, and cellular homeostasis, further expand their biological relevance. Clinical trials exploring strategies to inhibit BCL-2 and BCL-xL, including selective BH3 mimetics and combination regimens, are discussed with emphasis on their potential and limitations in oncology. Overall, this review highlights the multifaceted contributions of BCL-2 and BCL-xL to cancer biology and underscores the importance of continued efforts to refine targeted therapeutic approaches.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license .

1. Introduction

B-cell lymphoma (BCL)-2 and BCL-xL are two antiapoptotic members of the BCL-2 family that play central roles in regulating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Apoptosis is the most common type of programmed cell death in human tissues and, together with cell proliferation, contributes to tissue homeostasis, development, and remodeling, such as during the formation of the aortic arch [ 1 , 2 ]. There are two major pathways mediating apoptosis: the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways ( Figure 1 ) [ 3 ].

The extrinsic pathway is initiated by extracellular death signals. Cell membranes express death receptors, such as Fas, TRAIL-R1/2, and TNF-R, that, upon binding to their respective ligands, recruit adaptor proteins like FADD to form the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), resulting in the activation of initiator caspase-8 and caspase-10 [ 3 , 4 ]. In contrast, the intrinsic pathway is triggered by intracellular stress signals, including DNA damage, oncogenic activation, oxidative stress, or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which converge on the mitochondria and lead to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) [ 3 ]. Members of the BCL-2 family tightly regulate this pathway [ 5 ]. These proteins are organized into three major functional groups: (i) antiapoptotic proteins (BCL-2, BCL-xL, myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL-1), BCL-w, BCL-2-related gene A1 (A1/BFL-1), and BCL-B), (ii) pro-apoptotic effectors (BCL-2-associated X protein (BAX), BCL-2 homologous antagonist/killer (BAK), and BCL-2-related ovarian killer (BOK)), and (iii) BH3-only activators and sensitizers (such as BCL-2-interacting mediator of cell death (BIM), BH3-interacting domain death agonist (BID), p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA), NOXA, BCL-2-modifying factor (BMF), BCL-2 interacting killer (BIK), BCL-2 agonistic of cell death (BAD), and Harakiri (HRK)). Their interactions are mediated through conserved BCL-2 homology (BH) domains, which allow antiapoptotic proteins to sequester BH3-only factors or directly inhibit BAX/BAK oligomerization, thereby preventing MOMP. For instance, BIK binds and inhibits pro-survival proteins, including BCL-xL, thereby promoting MOMP; given BIK’s ER localization, the interaction is thought to occur at ER–mitochondria contact sites [ 6 ]. MOMP results in the release of pro-apoptotic factors, most notably cytochrome c, from the mitochondrial intermembrane space into the cytosol, where cytochrome c associates with APAF-1 and procaspase-9 to form the apoptosome [ 7 ]. This complex activates caspase-9 (intrinsic pathway), or, in the extrinsic route, caspase-8 and caspase-10 directly activate downstream effectors. Ultimately, both pathways converge on the activation of executioner caspases, such as caspase-3 and caspase-7, which cleave essential structural and regulatory proteins, leading to the morphological and biochemical hallmarks of apoptotic cell death [ 8 ]. While the BCL-2 family comprises several proteins with pro- or antiapoptotic functions, BCL-2 and BCL-xL have been particularly implicated in tumor cell survival and therapeutic response pathways in cancer [ 9 ]. Both BCL-2 and BCL-xL are among the most studied antiapoptotic regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, acting as central control points for MOMP, the critical step that determines whether a cell will commit to apoptosis [ 10 ]. MOMP is tightly coupled to mitochondrial metabolic status. Mitochondria integrate bioenergetic flux, redox balance, and calcium signaling, all of which critically influence apoptotic susceptibility. Antiapoptotic proteins such as BCL-2 and BCL-xL not only prevent MOMP by inhibiting BAX/BAK activation but also modulate mitochondrial metabolism by regulating oxidative phosphorylation efficiency, mitochondrial membrane potential, and ATP production [ 11 , 12 ]. In particular, BCL-xL has been shown to interact with components of the F 1 F 0 -ATP synthase, enhancing mitochondrial energetic efficiency and promoting cell survival under metabolic stress [ 12 ]. Moreover, BCL-2 family members localize to mitochondria-associated membranes, where they regulate ER–mitochondria calcium transfer, thereby linking metabolic signaling to apoptotic priming [ 13 ]. Metabolic stress conditions, such as nutrient deprivation or altered mitochondrial respiration, can sensitize cells to apoptosis by shifting the balance of BCL-2 family interactions, influencing cytochrome c release and caspase activation [ 14 ]. These metabolic–apoptotic interconnections are particularly relevant in cancer cells, where metabolic reprogramming contributes to apoptotic resistance and impacts the therapeutic efficacy of BCL-2 and BCL-xL inhibitors [ 14 ].

Because apoptosis is a fundamental tumor-suppressive mechanism, its evasion is considered a hallmark of cancer. BCL-2 and BCL-xL are frequently dysregulated across malignancies, where their overexpression supports tumor cell survival, enhances chemoresistance, and facilitates disease progression [ 15 ]. Functional assays such as BH3 profiling have shown that cancers can exhibit a specific dependency on BCL-2 or BCL-xL for survival, reflecting a measurable shift in apoptotic threshold that correlates with therapeutic sensitivity or resistance in different tumor types, a pattern less consistently observed for other antiapoptotic family members [ 16 , 17 ]. This dependency is not uniform across all antiapoptotic family members but is especially evident for BCL-2 and BCL-xL in various hematologic and solid tumor contexts, where their relative expression and binding affinities dictate apoptotic control and drug responsiveness [ 18 ].

Beyond apoptosis suppression, these proteins also influence metabolic adaptation, mitochondrial dynamics, calcium signaling, angiogenesis, and cell migration, highlighting their multifaceted roles in tumor biology [ 19 ]. Clinically, the therapeutic relevance of the BCL-2 family is underscored by the success of BH3 mimetics such as Venetoclax, approved for hematologic malignancies, although resistance mechanisms, particularly involving MCL-1 and BCL-xL, remain important challenges. In this review, we summarize the structural and functional characteristics of BCL-2 and BCL-xL, highlight their contribution to tumor biology, and discuss clinical trials exploring current therapeutic strategies targeting these key survival proteins.

2. BCL-2 and BCL-xL Genes and Regulation

The BCL2 gene is located on chromosome 18 (18q21.33) and is constituted by three exons ( Figure 2 ). The BH domains are encoded by the first two exons, while the third encodes the transmembrane domain [ 20 , 21 ].

Transcription of BCL2 is promoted in response to signaling from diverse cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-7, or upon activation of antigen receptors which leads to the stimulation of several transcription factors [ 22 ]. In the endometrium and glandular cells, BCL2 gene transcription seems to be regulated by c-Jun. It is possible that, in the endometrium, this regulation depends on the interaction of c-Jun with estrogen–estrogen receptor α [ 23 ]. PR/SET domain 10, an epigenetic regulator involved in development and cell differentiation, also promotes BCL-2 mRNA expression by binding to BCL2 gene promoter [ 24 ]. Furthermore, the transcription factor GATA-1 is also involved in BCL2 transcription regulation, while GATA-4 was found to promote BCL-2 expression in both normal ovarian cells and ovarian granulosa cell tumors [ 25 , 26 ]. Moreover, NF-κB overexpression was associated with a six-fold increase in BCL2 promoter transcriptional activity, whereas mutations in the promoter eliminated this effect [ 27 ]. The BCL2 promoter also presents a CRE site where the transcriptional factor CREB, when phosphorylated, can bind and promote BCL-2 expression [ 28 ]. Sec6 and Sec8 were found to regulate BCL2 transcription by modulating CREB and NF-κB activity in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cells. Depletion of Sec6 and Sec8 decreases BCL-2 expression [ 29 ].

In colon and liver cancer, methionine adenosyltransferase α2 was found to bind to the BCL2 promoter and induce its expression, but also to the BCL-2 protein stabilizing it [ 30 ].

On the other hand, c-Myc can repress BCL-2 expression to promote apoptosis. This regulation appears to require c-Myc binding to the transcription factor MIZ-1, leading to its functional inactivation [ 31 ].

At the post-transcriptional level several proteins have been reported to promote stability or to destabilize BCL-2 mRNA. In glioblastoma, human antigen R was found to bind to the 3′ untranslated region of both BCL-2 and BCL-xL mRNAs, stabilizing them and preventing their degradation [ 32 ]. Similarly, nucleolin has also been shown to bind to 3′ untranslated region in BCL-2 and BCL-xL mRNAs, stabilizing them [ 33 ]. Furthermore, ζ-crystallin, transformer 2β (TRA2β), and La-related protein 1 also act as stabilizers of BCL-2 in different types of cancer [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. On the other hand, adenylate-uridylate-rich element RNA-binding protein 1 and zinc finger protein 36, C3H1 type-like 1 have been found to destabilize BCL-2 mRNA, leading to its degradation and consequently decreasing BCL-2 protein levels [ 35 , 37 , 38 ]. The following miRNAs have also been reported to regulate BCL-2 mRNA levels: miR-15/16, miR-21, miR-24, miR-29a, miR-34a, miR-124-3p, miR-125a, miR-125b, miR-153, miR-155, miR-181a, miR-195, miR-202, miR-204, miR-205, miR-206, miR-214, miR-223, miR-338-3p, miR-365, miR-370-3p, miR-383, miR-432-5p, miR-448, miR-497, miR-503-5p, miR-744, miR-1290, and miR-1915-3p [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ].

Moreover, BCL-2 has two protein isoforms: BCL-2α, an antiapoptotic isoform with 239 amino acids, and BCL-2β, with 205 amino acids and no known function [ 21 ].

The BCL-X gene, also known as BCL2L1 , localizes on chromosome 20 (20q11.21) [ 55 ]. The expression of BCL-X is induced by IL-2, IL-3, IL-6, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, colony-stimulating factor-1, leukemia inhibitory factor, erythropoietin, and also by the activation of antigen receptors ( Figure 3 ) [ 22 ]. The BCL-X gene transcription is regulated by several transcription factor families such as STAT, NF-κB, E26 transformation specific sequence, and activator protein 1 complex [ 56 ]. Its expression is also stimulated by integrin, vitronectin, hepatocyte growth factor, and the activated RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [ 22 ]. In prostate cancer cells, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α was found to directly bind to a region of BCL-X promoter known as hypoxia-responsive element promoting BCL-xL transcription [ 57 ]. Furthermore, type 2 calreticulin mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms were associated with activation of the transcriptional factor activating transcription factor 6, leading to increased transcription of BCL-xL [ 58 ]. Upon CD40 stimulation the NF-κB subunits p65 and p52 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells bind to the BCL-X promoter, inducing BCL-xL expression [ 59 ]. MAPK-mediated phosphorylation of GATA-1 can also promote BCL-xL transcription. Nonetheless, GATA-1 activity is antagonized by Gfi1B [ 26 ].

GATA-3 and GATA-4 have also been reported to regulate transcription of BCL-xL [ 26 ]. Nonetheless, BCL-xL expression can be repressed by c-Myc to promote apoptosis [ 31 ].

Due to alternative splicing two major mRNA isoforms exist: BCL-xL, with 780 base pairs, and BCL-xS, with 591 base pairs [ 55 ]. The splicing is highly regulated involving several proteins like SRC associated with mitosis, of 68 kDa (SAM68), alternative splicing factor (ASF) 1/Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor (SRSF) 1, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), RNA binding motif protein (RBM) 25, and RBM4 [ 56 , 60 ].

For instance, when SAM68 is overexpressed and associated with hnRNP A1, which is regulated by Fyn kinase, it promotes BCL-xS production, while when depleted BCL-xL production is induced [ 60 ]. However, factor that binds to inducer of short transcripts 1, a transcription factor, SRSF1 and SRSF10 can inhibit SAM68, promoting BCL-xL expression [ 60 , 61 ]. In lung cancer, the serine/threonine kinase CK1ε was found to phosphorylate SRSF10, which is suggested to be necessary for SRSF10 to bind to BCL-X pre-mRNA, leading to BCL-xL expression [ 62 ]. Nonetheless, SRSF10 can also promote BCL-xS in association with SAM68 and hnRNP A1/A2 in response to DNA damage. SRSF1 is positively regulated by NEK2 and SR protein kinase 1, but negatively regulated by PTBP1, also known as hnRNP I, and RBM4, which compete for the same binding sites [ 63 ]. Moreover, other proteins that can bind to RNA G-quadruplexes, usually found in introns, and G-quadruplex stabilizing small molecules, such as GQC-05, can also modulate BCL-X splicing. For instance, GQC-05 was shown to shift splicing to express BCL-xS [ 64 ]. U1 snRNP, hnRNP F, hnRNP H, RBM25, RBM10, RBM4, SRSF2, SRSF3, TRA2β, and staurosporine also promote BCL-xS expression [ 60 , 63 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 ]. Nonetheless, in glioma cells, SRSF1 and SRSF2 were shown to promote BCL-xL expression, whereas SRSF6 favored BCL-xS expression. The truncated form of dual-specificity and tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated protein kinase 1A, involved in Alzheimer’s disease, however, inhibits SRSF1, enhancing production of the BCL-xS isoform [ 69 ]. Similarly, RBM11 also antagonizes SRSF1 [ 70 ]. Ceramide, a component lipid that regulates growth pathways and cell stress responses, has also been implicated in the splicing of BCL-X by promoting BCL-xS production [ 63 ].

On the other hand, hnRNP K, SRSF7, splicing-factor-3B-subunit-1 (SF3B1), and SRSF9 are involved in the expression of BCL-xL [ 60 , 66 , 71 ]. Core and auxiliary proteins, like Y14, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A-III, RNA-binding protein with SR domain 1 (RNPS1), acinus, and Sin3A-associated protein, 18 kDa, part of the exon junction complex, were also shown to promote BCL-xL production since their depletion shifted the alternative splicing in favor of BCL-xS [ 72 ]. In addition, the SB1 region in the BCL-X pre-mRNA can be bound by a repressor of BCL-xS isoform. A slower RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) rate of elongation can allow the repressor to bind to this region and induce BCL-xL production. However, the splicing-related factor transcription elongation regulator 1 was shown to modulate the RNAPII rate of elongation shifting the production of BCL-xL to BCL-xS [ 73 ]. In multiple myeloma, N -acetyltransferase 10 was found to acetylate BCL-xL mRNA, stabilizing it and allowing upregulation of BCL-xL which is essential for the activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway promoting cancer proliferation and progression [ 74 ].

At the post-transcriptional level, miRNAs regulate BCL-xL expression. For instance, the miRNAs miR-5-5p, Let-7b-5p, Let-7c/g, miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-133a/b, miR140-5p, miR-203a-3p, miR-203b-3p, miR-326, miR-377, miR-491, miR-608, miR-4270, and miR4300 all target BCL-xL [ 22 , 39 , 60 , 75 , 76 , 77 ]. In pancreatic cancer, the long non-coding RNA MIR4435-2HG was found to act as ceRNA that binds to miR-513a-5p, promoting BCL-X expression inducing cell proliferation [ 78 ].

Besides BCL-xL, antiapoptotic form with 233 amino acids, and BCL-xS, pro-apoptotic form with 170 amino acids, a third protein isoform, BCL-xβ, with 277 amino acids and no known function exists [ 55 , 56 ].

3. BCL-2 Family Members Domains and Functions

BCL-2 family members can be divided in three categories: prosurvival, which include BCL-2 and BCL-xL, containing four BH domains (BH1 to BH4); pro-apoptotic, such as BAX and BAK, containing three BH domains (BH1 to BH3); and another category comprising proteins that only contain the BH3 domain, like BAD and BIM ( Figure 4 ) [ 5 , 79 , 80 ]. However, several other BCL-2 family proteins, such as BCL-G, BCL-2 family kin (BFK), and BCL-RAMBO, do not fit in these categories.

Nonetheless, several members have a hydrophobic C-terminal region suggested to function as a transmembrane anchor [ 5 , 79 ].

The BH1–3 domains form a hydrophobic loop which is needed for BCL-2 and BCL-xL to interact with apoptotic regulators, including BH3-only proteins, and perform their antiapoptotic activity [ 80 ].

The BH4 domain is essential for several functions of BCL-2 and BCL-xL. For instance, this domain is necessary for the heterodimerization of BCL-2 and BAX which leads to BAX inhibition [ 81 ]. Furthermore, phosphorylation of BCL-2 at serine (Ser) 87 is important for this interaction since it decreases BCL-2’s affinity to BAX [ 82 ].

The BH4 domain is also necessary for BCL-2-dependent recruitment of rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma-1 to the mitochondria, where it serves as a scaffold for BAD and protein kinase–theta interaction, leading to BAD phosphorylation, inhibiting it and consequently apoptosis [ 83 , 84 ]. The antiapoptotic function of BCL-2 depends on the phosphorylation of its Ser70 residue that is negatively regulated by protein phosphatase 2A-B56δ when cells are subjected to oxidative stress ( Figure 5 and Table 1 ) [ 85 , 86 ].

The phosphorylation of Ser70 can be carried out by MAPK and protein kinase Cα [ 87 , 88 ]. In addition, p38 MAPK phosphorylates the residues threonine (Thr) 56 and Ser87 of BCL-2, decreasing its antiapoptotic activity [ 89 ]. During oxidative stress, tumor necrosis factor-α induces the dephosphorylation of these residues and leads to BCL-2 degradation [ 90 ]. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 1 was also found to phosphorylate BCL-2 at Thr56, during G 2 /M, leading to cell cycle inhibition, even in normal cells [ 91 ]. CDK1 in association with cyclin B1 also phosphorylates BCL-2 at Thr69, Ser70, Thr74, and Ser87, leading to increased affinity to BAK and BIM [ 92 ]. Furthermore, it has been reported that in BCL-2 and BCL-xL, the cleavage of the BH4 region, performed by caspase-1 or -3, can lead these proteins to promote apoptosis instead of their usual role of inhibiting it [ 80 ]. Interestingly, during exposure to Cisplatin, CDK2 was shown to phosphorylate BCL-xL at Ser73, leading to BCL-xL behaving like BAX and promoting apoptosis ( Table 2 ) [ 93 ]. In addition, phosphorylation of the Ser62 residue or the deamidation of the asparagine residues on positions 52 and 66 in the intrinsically disordered region (IDR), also known as flexible loop domain, of BCL-xL promotes a structural rearrangement decreasing BCL-xL affinity for pro-apoptotic BH3 domains [ 94 ]. Deamidation will also promote BCL-xL degradation. It has been shown that the rate of deamidation can increase in the presence of DNA-damaging agents [ 95 ]. Two histidines close to the asparagine residues seem to be crucial for the promotion of BCL-xL deamidation by sensing pH increases caused by DNA-damaging agents [ 96 ].

The region of BCL-xL that the phosphorylated and/or deamidated IDR interacts with is also the region that interacts with p53. The interaction with p53 suppresses apoptosis dependent on BAX. Furthermore, PUMA can also bind to this region competing with p53 and BH3-only proteins, releasing them from BCL-xL [ 94 , 97 ]. Free p53 can then activate BAX and subsequently apoptosis [ 98 ].

BCL-xL needs to be present in the mitochondria’s outer membrane to promote its integrity. This is achieved by the interaction of BCL-xL with vacuolar protein sorting (VPS)35 and VPS26, which are components of retromer, a protein complex part of the endosomal protein sorting machinery. MICAL-like protein 1, a protein associated with retromer, is also important for BCL-xL mitochondrial localization [ 10 ]. Mitofusin 2 and mitofusin 1, two dynamin-related GTPases, also interact with BCL-xL, but only mitofusin 2 is necessary for BCL-xL-induced mitochondrial aggregation [ 99 ].

To prevent MOMP, BCL-xL inhibits BAX activity. Nonetheless, this process is still poorly understood. BAX is a pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family member that has a crucial role in the formation of pores in the mitochondrial membrane that leads to MOMP [ 2 ].

There are several proposed models for BAX and BAK, which is also involved in MOMP promotion, repression, and activation. In the direct model, BH3-only proteins can be divided in activators, such as BID and BIM, and sensitizers like BIK and PUMA [ 100 ]. For instance, when BID is cleaved by caspase-8 it converts into its active form, cBID, which contains p7 and p15 (tBID), and it translocates to the outer membrane of the mitochondria where it can activate BAX and BAK and also promote BCL-xL insertion on the membrane. However, BCL-xL inhibits BAX activation by binding to tBID or to BAX, blocking their interaction [ 101 , 102 , 103 ]. The complex formed by BCL-xL and BAX is stabilized by the interaction of vaccinia-related kinase-2A, a nuclear envelope kinase, and BCL-xL, hindering BAX dissociation while BAD binds to BCL-xL, allowing BAX and tBID interaction [ 104 , 105 ]. Thus, in the direct model, proteins like BAD and BIK inhibit the interaction of BCL-xL and BAX, consequently promoting apoptosis [ 100 ].

On the other hand, the indirect model proposes that BAX and BAK do not interact directly with BH3-only proteins but are indirectly activated by the inhibition of the prosurvival BCL-2 members carried by BH3-only proteins. The difference between the direct and indirect models is that in the indirect one all BH3-only proteins act as sensitizers [ 100 ]. A more recently proposed model suggests a combination of both models where prosurvival proteins can both sequester the activators and BAX and BAK [ 56 ].

BCL-xL is also involved in the retrotranslocation of BAX from mitochondria to cytosol by leading to the establishment of weak inhibitory mitochondrial complexes [ 106 ]. It is suggested that in non-apoptotic cells BAX localization in the mitochondria or cytosol follows a dynamic equilibrium that can be shifted in favor of a more cytosolic one by BCL-xL [ 2 ]. It seems that BAD plays a role in this retrotranslocation by binding to BCL-xL, promoting the release of BAX, and that AKT-mediated phosphorylation of BAD regulates this process [ 107 ]. Paradoxically, it was also found that BCL-xL overexpression led to higher concentration of BAX in the mitochondria which can possibly be explained by the fact that BCL-xL is also involved in the translocation of BAX from the cytosol to the mitochondria [ 2 ]. More recently, it was reported that binding of BCL-xL with BH3-only members inhibits its retrotranslocation, causing their accumulation in the mitochondria. It is suggested that this process might recruit pro-apoptotic proteins to the mitochondria whilst inhibiting them [ 108 ]. Additionally, it was shown that increased levels of BCL-2 and MCL-1 accelerated retrotranslocation of BAX [ 109 ]. Nonetheless, for BAK, only MCL-1 and BCL-xL increased expression led to a similar effect [ 110 ]. E2F1, a transcriptional factor, has been shown to inhibit BCL-xL retrotranslocation which seems to be essential for BCL-xL’s role in BAK inhibition [ 111 ].

Ras, a GTPase, is also involved in both pro-apoptotic and antiapoptotic signaling. In apoptosis induced by the cell membrane death receptor Fas signaling, Ras is activated. Nonetheless, active mitochondrial Ras is then regulated by BCL-2 activity, leading to the repression of Ras-mediated apoptotic signaling [ 112 ].

Both BCL-xL and BCL-2 regulate autophagy by interacting with Beclin-1, inhibiting its activity [ 113 , 114 ]. Beclin-1 forms, alongside other proteins, class III PI3K complexes that play a role in the formation of the autophagosome [ 115 ]. The interaction between BCL-2 and BCL-xL with BAK, BAX, and Beclin-1 can be inhibited by the JNK-mediated phosphorylation of BCL-2 and BCL-xL, leading to the promotion of apoptosis and autophagy [ 116 ]. Furthermore, in osteoclasts precursors, autophagy is induced by the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand-facilitated phosphorylation of BCL-2 Ser70 which decreases interaction between BCL-2 and Beclin-1 [ 82 ]. On the other hand, PARK2-mediated mono-ubiquitination of BCL-2 seems to enhance the interaction between BCL-2 and Beclin-1 [ 117 ].

BCL-2 is also involved in the inhibition of GABARAP, part of the GABARAP subfamily that is involved in phagophore and autophagosome formation, through the BH4 domain, affecting GABARAP lipidation and consequently inhibiting autophagy [ 118 , 119 ].

Other than the mitochondria, BCL-xL and BCL-2 also play a role in the ER where they are involved in the repression of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP 3 R) activity [ 120 ]. IP 3 R is a Ca 2+ channel that is involved in important cellular events such as proliferation and apoptosis [ 121 ]. Thus, BCL-2 and BCL-xL-mediated inhibition regulates Ca 2+ pro-apoptotic release. BCL-2 inhibits IP 3 R through the interaction of the BH4 domain with the receptor. Additionally, the transmembrane domain is essential for BCL-2 localization near the IP 3 R transmembrane domain [ 120 , 122 ]. However, BCL-xL-mediated inhibition of IP 3 R does not seem to be dependent on the BH4 domain but rather on BH3 domain since, when lysine (Lys) 87 was mutated, BCL-xL lost the capacity to interact with IP 3 R [ 120 , 123 ]. The transmembrane domain and BCL-xL capacity to dimerize are also suggested to play a role in this interaction [ 100 ]. Nonetheless, it seems that BCL-xL can both activate and inhibit IP 3 R, and the role is dependent on BCL-xL concentration. At low concentrations BCL-xL activates IP 3 R, while at higher concentrations BCL-xL inhibits it [ 124 ]. Furthermore, BCL-2 and BCL-xL inhibit ryanodine receptors in a similar way. Ryanodine receptors are Ca 2+ channels that can be found in several types of cells, including hippocampal neurons, and it is suggested that they also play a role in apoptosis [ 125 , 126 ]. BCL-xL also inhibits voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1), preventing Ca 2+ pro-apoptotic signals from entering the mitochondria [ 127 ]. Accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER leads to ER stress which when unresolved triggers apoptosis. It is suggested that the promotion of apoptosis during ER stress occurs through the RING finger (RNF) 183-mediated ubiquitination of BCL-xL and its consequent degradation [ 128 ].

In hippocampal neurons, BCL-xL has been shown to increase both the energy metabolism and synaptic activity while also promoting synapse formation through dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), a GTPase involved in neurite growth [ 129 ]. For instance, in rat hippocampal neurons, BCL-xL was shown to promote synapse formation through the regulation of caspase-3 by inhibiting Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission [ 130 ]. In addition, BCL-xL interaction with Drp1 and clathrin is required for vesicle endocytosis regulation. This function is dependent on calmodulin which promotes the translocation of both BCL-xL and Drp1 to synaptic vesicles [ 131 ]. BCL-xL also plays a role in neurite growth by inhibiting death receptor 6 activity both under normal and hypoxic conditions [ 129 ].

BCL-2 and BCL-xL have also been shown to play a role in hematopoietic differentiation. In IL-3-deprived factor-dependent cell-Patersen Mix multipotent progenitor cells, BCL-2 led to their differentiation into granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages while the ones expressing BCL-xL differentiated into erythroid cells [ 132 ].

A role in the cell cycle has also been proposed for BCL-2 since increased levels of BCL-2 are associated with delays in the transition from G 0 /G 1 to S phase. This delay is promoted by the regulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ATP levels. It is suggested that BCL-2 can regulate mitochondrial metabolic pathways, leading to a decrease in both ATP and ROS levels while increasing p27 kip1 , a CDK inhibitor, expression [ 133 ]. It is also suggested that BCL-2 increases p130 expression and that p27 leads to CDK2 inhibition. CDK2 is involved in the degradation of both p27 and p130. p130 in turn forms a repressive complex with E2F4 that, as proposed in the model, should repress transcription of genes that are involved in cell cycle entry [ 134 ]. Moreover, BCL-2’s antiapoptotic function is inactivated through phosphorylation of Ser70 at G 2 /M through the ASK1/JNK pathway [ 135 ]. As previously referred, CDK1 also phosphorylates BCL-2 at G 2 /M. This phosphorylation occurs at Thr56, inducing G 2 /M arrest [ 91 ]. However, it has been found that BCL-2 phosphorylated at Thr56 accumulates in nuclear structures in early prophase, while in late prophase it localizes around mitotic chromosomes. In metaphase, BCL-2 remains localized around mitotic chromosomes. It seems that BCL-2 forms complexes with CDK1, nucleolin, and PP1 and that dynamic phosphorylation of BCL-2 might regulate its function during mitosis [ 136 ].

BCL-xL was also shown to play a role during the cell cycle where it undergoes dynamic phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events at both Ser49 and Ser62. A pool of Ser49-phosphorylated BCL-xL is found at centromeres during G 2 checkpoint, a result of DNA damage. Further, another pool of phospho-BCL-xL Ser49 occurs through telophase where it seems to play a role in cytokinesis. The phosphorylation of BCL-xL is performed by polo-like kinase (PLK) 3, which is consistent with the proposed role of BCL-xL in the cell cycle since PLK3 is involved in cell cycle progression [ 137 ]. The phosphorylation at Ser62 has also been implicated in G 2 arrest and is promoted by both PLK1 and JNK2, leading to BCL-xL recruitment to nucleolar structures during the stabilization of G 2 arrest [ 138 ]. Additionally, PLK1 and MAPK14/p38α-mediated BCL-xL phosphorylation of Ser62 during prometaphase and metaphase led to BCL-xL’s association with the spindle assembly checkpoint silencing complexes and also to its localization at centromeres. It is suggested that BCL-xL might be involved in spindle assembly and chromosome segregation [ 139 ]. In human diploid fibroblasts this dynamic was shown to promote chromosome stability and prevent aneuploidy [ 140 ]. Furthermore, in Rat1 fibroblasts, BCL-xL was also shown to delay the cell cycle, while BAD has been shown to counter the cell cycle arrest promoted by both BCL-2 and BCL-xL [ 141 ].

BCL-xL has also been implicated in DNA damage response. JNK is activated in response to genotoxic agents, leading to its translocation to the mitochondria where it phosphorylates BCL-xL in both Thr47 and Thr115, promoting apoptosis [ 142 ]. Additionally, in rat cardiac myocyte, response to oxidative stress leads to the activation of K-Ras which consequently promotes the Ras association domain family (RASSF) 1A-mediated activation of the mammalian sterile 20-like kinase (MST) 1. MST1 in turn phosphorylates BCL-xL at Ser14, repressing its interaction with BAX, thus inducing apoptosis [ 143 ].

BCL-xL also plays a role in the regulation of mitophagy. It was found that BCL-xL interacts with PARK2, also known as Parkin, preventing its translocation to the mitochondria but also with PINK1, blocking the binding of PARK2 to PINK1, repressing mitophagy [ 144 ]. PINK1 was also found to phosphorylate BCL-xL at Ser62, promoting its antiapoptotic function [ 145 ].

Table 1
Post-translational modifications of BCL-2 and its functional impacts.
? refers to unknown modification site.

Modification SitesInteracting MoleculesModificationFunctional ImpactsReferences
Thr56p38 MAPKPhosphorylationSuppresses BCL-2 antiapoptotic activity[ 89 ]
CDK1PhosphorylationPromotes cell cycle inhibition[ 91 ]
Thr69CDK1 + cyclin B1PhosphorylationEnhanced affinity for BAK and BIM. In the presence of apigenin, suppresses BCL-2 antiapoptotic activity[ 92 , 146 ]
JNKPhosphorylationProbably essential for Paclitaxel to fully induce cell death. Also needed for autophagy promotion.[ 116 , 147 ]
Ser70PP2ADephosphorylationPrevents BCL-2 antiapoptotic function[ 86 ]
MAPKPhosphorylationEssential for BCL-2 antiapoptotic function[ 87 ]
PKCαPhosphorylationEssential for BCL-2 antiapoptotic function[ 88 ]
CDK1 + cyclin B1PhosphorylationEnhanced affinity for BAK and BIM[ 92 ]
JNKPhosphorylationEssential for Paclitaxel to fully induce cell death. Also promotes autophagy[ 116 , 147 ]
RANKLPhosphorylationPromotes interaction between BCL-2 and Beclin-1[ 82 ]
Thr74TNF-αDephosphorylationLeads to BCL-2 degradation[ 90 ]
CDK1 + cyclin B1PhosphorylationEnhanced affinity for BAK and BIM[ 92 ]
Ser87p38 MAPKPhosphorylationSuppresses BCL-2 antiapoptotic activity[ 89 ]
TNF-αDephosphorylationLeads to BCL-2 degradation[ 90 ]
CDK1 + cyclin B1PhosphorylationEnhanced affinity for BAK and BIM. In the presence of apigenin, suppresses BCL-2 antiapoptotic activity[ 92 , 146 ]
JNKPhosphorylationEssential for Paclitaxel to fully induce cell death. Also promotes autophagy[ 116 , 147 ]
PaxillinPhosphorylationPromotes BCL-2 stability[ 148 ]
?PARK2UbiquitinationIncreases BCL-2 and Beclin-1 interaction, but can also promote BCL-2 degradation[ 117 ]

Table 2
Post-translational modifications of BCL-xL and its functional impacts.
? refers to unknown modification site or protein responsible for the modification.

Modification SitesInteracting MoleculesModificationFunctional ImpactsReferences
Ser14MST1PhosphorylationRepresses BCL-xL and BAX interaction[ 143 ]
Thr47SAPKPhosphorylationIn the presence of DNA damage promotes apoptosis[ 142 ]
Ser49PLK3PhosphorylationIn G 2 checkpoint phosphorylation of Ser49 occurs in the presence of DNA damage. In telophase Ser49 phosphorylation is implicated in cytokinesis[ 137 ]
Asp52?DeamidationDecreases BCL-xL affinity for pro-apoptotic BH3 domains. Promotes BCL-xL degradation[ 94 , 95 ]
Ser62CDK1 + cyclin B1PhosphorylationSuppresses BCL-xL antiapoptotic activity[ 146 ]
PLK1 + JNK2PhosphorylationLeads to BCL-xL recruitment to nucleolar structures during the stabilization of G 2 arrest[ 138 ]
MAPK14 + PLK1PhosphorylationDuring prometaphase and metaphase leads to BCL-xL association with SAC silencing complexes and also to its localization at centromeres, suggesting a possible role of BCL-xL in spindle assembly and chromosome segregation[ 139 ]
PINK1PhosphorylationPrevents cell death[ 145 ]
PGAM5DephosphorylationPrevents cell death by increasing BCL-xL affinity to BAX and BAK[ 149 ]
Asp66?DeamidationDecreases BCL-xL affinity for pro-apoptotic BH3 domains. Promotes BCL-xL degradation[ 94 , 95 ]
Ser73CDK2PhosphorylationApoptosis promotion in the presence of Cisplatin[ 93 ]
Thr115SAPKPhosphorylationIn the presence of DNA damage promotes apoptosis[ 142 ]
Ser145?PhosphorylationPAR2 when activated promotes phosphorylation of Ser145 stabilizing BCL-xL[ 150 ]
?RNF152UbiquitinationLeads to BCL-xL degradation[ 150 ]
RNF183UbiquitinationLeads to BCL-xL degradation[ 128 ]
GRIM19UbiquitinationIndirectly promotes BCL-xL ubiquitination leading to its degradation[ 151 ]
PARK2UbiquitinationLeads to BCL-xL degradation[ 117 ]

4. Function of BCL-2 and BCL-xL in Cancer

4.1. Invasiveness and Progression

Besides their roles in non-transformed cells, BCL-2 and BCL-xL have also been reported to play roles in pro-tumoral events.

For instance, in cancer cells, BCL-2 pro-survival family members can promote cell invasion and migration by increasing ROS levels, although not high enough to stimulate cell death [ 152 ].

It has been proposed that BCL-2 regulates ROS production by modulating mitochondrial respiration in cancer cells. BCL-2 interacts with the cytochrome c oxidase (COX) Va subunit through its BH2 domain and its C-terminal region, promoting the localization of COX Va to the mitochondria. High BCL-2 expression also correlates with increased mitochondrial localization of COX Vb localization at the mitochondria, although this effect is thought to occur indirectly as a consequence of COX Va enrichment in the mitochondria. This way, BCL-2 increases COX activity and ROS production. However, under oxidative stress, BCL-2 decreases COX Vb presence in the mitochondria and stabilizes COX Va, leading to decreased COX activity and lower ROS levels [ 153 ]. In breast cancer, BCL-xL-mediated increase in ROS was shown to be dependent on BCL-xL interaction with VDAC1 [ 154 ]. Furthermore, it has been reported that BCL-xL promotion of metastasis is independent of its apoptotic activity and that the metastatic function is only observed for BCL-xL localized in the nucleus where it increased tri-methylation of histone 3 in Lys4, a marker of transcriptional activation [ 155 ]. BCL-xL translocation to the nucleus seems to be carried out by the transcriptional regulator C-terminal binding protein 2 [ 156 ].

In breast cancer, BCL-xL overexpression induces lymph node metastasis by preventing cytokine-induced cell death and promoting the ability of cells to proliferate in an anchorage-independent manner [ 157 ]. ER-positive breast cancer cells present higher expression of the lncRNA BC200. BC200 participates in breast cancer pathogenesis since it binds to BCL-X pre-mRNA and recruits hnRNP A2/B1 which in turn blocks SAM68 from binding to the pre-mRNA. This way, BC200 promotes the production of BCL-xL [ 158 ]. Furthermore, in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), high levels of the kinase Aurora A and BCL-xL were linked to promotion of metastasis [ 159 ]. In addition, BCL-2 overexpression leads to NF-κB activation, increasing matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 expression in breast cancer. MMP-9 is associated with tumor metastasis and invasion [ 160 ]. It also increases MMP-2, it too associated with invasiveness, in cooperation with N-MYC, a transcription factor involved in cell proliferation, in neuroblastoma and lung cancer [ 161 , 162 ].

In lung cancer, BCL-xL expression is associated with migration and invasion promotion since increased expression of Let-7a-5p led to downregulation of BCL-xL and repression of these processes. Moreover, Let-7a-5p expression induces toxic autophagy by hindering the PI3K signaling pathway [ 163 ]. γ-irradiation also promoted migration and invasion in lung cancer by promoting STAT3 activity. STAT3 then induced BCL-xL transcription. Increased expression of BCL-xL was associated with augmented expression of MMP-2 and vimentin, enhanced phosphorylation of p38 and AKT, and downregulation of E-cadherin [ 164 ].

C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), a chemokine receptor, has been shown to promote tumor growth and survival by modulating microRNAs: in neuroblastoma, it downregulates miR-15a/16-1, leading to increased BCL-2 and cyclin D1 expression, while in ovarian cancer, it suppresses let-7a, resulting in the upregulation of BCL-xL [ 165 ].

Similarly, in melanoma cells, the overexpression of miR-365 led to inhibition of cell proliferation by downregulating BCL-2 and cyclin D1 [ 166 ]. BCL-2 is also involved in progression in melanoma by promoting stability of Semaphorin 5A, an axon regulator, at the mRNA and protein levels. Semaphorin 5A promotes migration through the activation of the MEK/ERK pathway [ 167 ]. The lncRNA LHFPL3-AS1-long also plays a role in melanoma stem cells tumorigenesis by binding to miR-181a-5p, preventing BCL-2 mRNA degradation [ 168 ]. Moreover, metastatic melanoma patient samples showed higher expression of BCL-2 and BCL-xL than primary melanoma, benign nevi, and normal skin samples, suggesting a role for these proteins in melanoma progression [ 169 ]. Accordingly, BCL-2 overexpression was found to be associated with higher expression of MMP-2 and MMP-7 [ 170 ]. In melanoma and glioblastoma cells, BCL-xL overexpression was found to promote migration, invasion, and angiogenesis [ 171 ].

Furthermore, glioblastoma progression is promoted in part by increased expression of BCL-xL caused by downregulation of tumor suppressor candidate 2 due to neural precursor cell-expressed developmentally downregulated 4-mediated polyubiquitination [ 172 ]. Accordingly, inhibition of the splicing factor SF3B1 reduced migration, tumorigenesis, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion by shifting BCL-X pre-mRNA for BCL-xS production and repressing the AKT/mTOR/β-catenin pathways [ 71 ]. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), in normal cells, presents tumor suppressive activity. However, in glioblastoma cells with mutant p53, PTEN was shown to interact with the complex formed by mutant p53, acetyl-CBP, and NFYA, promoting their binding to BCL-xL and c-Myc promoter regions upregulating these proteins. Consequently, the upregulation of BCL-xL and c-Myc promoted cell invasion, proliferation, and tumor progression [ 173 ]. Moreover, BCL-2 expression in glioma cells increases Furin and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) expression which in turn leads to the upregulation of MMPs, promoting glioma cells invasiveness [ 174 ]. Similarly, BCL-xL upregulation induced TGF-β2, MMP-2, and MT1-MMP, promoting invasiveness of malignant glioma cells [ 175 ].

BCL-2 overexpression also promotes migration through modulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). uPAR is the receptor of uPA, a protease that converts the extracellular zymogen plasminogen to plasmin. Plasmin is involved in invasion and metastasis. By activating ERK leading to increased Sp1, a transcriptional factor, activity, BCL-2 promotes uPAR expression and consequently invasion [ 176 ]. BCL-2 was also shown to promote cell migration through interference in the Hippo pathway since it reduces MST2 protein levels. MST2 regulates Yes-associated protein (YAP), a transcription coregulator, by activating large tumor suppressor kinases (LATS) 1/2. LATS1/2 activation leads to the maintenance of YAP in the cytoplasm, inhibiting its transcriptional activity [ 177 ]. Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is a transcription factor involved in the expression of miR-211, a microRNA, associated with migration and invasion suppression, that is regulated by BCL-2. BCL-2 represses MITF nuclear activity probably through the interaction with heat shock protein (HSP) 90 [ 178 ]. In addition, both BCL-2 and BCL-xL can bind to a tumor suppressor protein known as SUFU, repressing its binding to GLI proteins. GLI proteins regulate some cell proliferation genes’ expression, and their binding to SUFU suppresses this activity, decreasing cell proliferation [ 179 ].

Circular RNAs have also been reported to contribute to cancer progression since, in osteosarcoma, circ_0000376 was found to bind to miR-432-5p, allowing the expression of BCL-2. Inhibition of circ_0000376 led to the repression of osteosarcoma cells migratory and invasive capabilities and increased cell death [ 45 ].

The knockdown of BCL-2, BCL-xL, or MCL-1 hindered migration and invasion in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells [ 180 ]. Moreover, BCL-2 was found to be associated with colon carcinogenesis since overexpression of miR-15a, which regulates BCL-2 expression, led to lower cell proliferation and reduced cell invasion properties [ 181 ]. Additionally, BCL-2 expression has been associated with early stages of carcinogenesis in colorectal neoplasias [ 182 ]. It has also been reported that BCL-2 was upregulated in CRC metastatic cells when compared with nonmetastatic ones [ 183 ]. Furthermore, dual specificity phosphatase 4 (DUSP4) is also associated with carcinogenesis in CRC. DUSP4 prevents JNK-mediated phosphorylation of BCL-2, while its silencing blocks the interaction of BCL-2 with Beclin-1 or BAX, increasing autophagy and apoptosis and repressing migration and invasiveness [ 184 ]. Depletion of circDUSP16 also affected CRC cells’ migration, invasion, and proliferation due to decreased BCL-2 expression. circDUSP16 targets miR-432-5p, and its depletion allows miR-432-5p to downregulate E2F6. E2F6 overexpression was previously reported to be associated with c-Src/ERK and BCL-2 upregulation. Thus it seems that E2F6 promotes BCL-2 expression by inducing c-Src/ERK signaling [ 185 , 186 ]. Besides BCL-2 overexpression in CRC, BCL-2 Ser70 phosphorylation status was also related with tumor aggressiveness since tumors in more advanced stages showed lower expression of phosphorylated Ser70 [ 187 ]. BCL-xL is also involved in CRC cells’ invasion, proliferation, and clonogenic formation since its inhibition impaired all of these processes [ 188 ]. The protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is also involved in cancer progression and in the regulation of the immune microenvironment. PAR2 stabilizes BCL-xL by promoting Ser145 phosphorylation. The phosphorylation of this residue prevents interaction with RNF152 and consequently BCL-xL polyubiquitination and degradation. Expression of BCL-xL inhibits type I IFN secretion, preventing recruitment of CD8 + T cells to metastatic sites [ 150 , 189 ]. Additionally, the lncRNA HEIH is involved in CRC tumorigenesis by targeting miR-939, preventing repression of BCL-xL transcription since miR-939 binds to NF-κB, blocking its binding to BCL-X promoter [ 190 ].

In oral cancer several studies have shown that BCL-2 is associated with differentiation since BCL-2 expression is increased in sequentially progressing epithelial dysplasia and in poorly differentiated carcinomas when compared to well-differentiated ones [ 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 ]. In accordance, Niedzielska et al. showed that in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), BCL-2 is more expressed than in patients with hyperplasia and patients with neoplasm in situ malignancy [ 196 ]. Nevertheless, tissue from the incision line, close to the tumor, showed higher BCL-2 expression in the three groups assessed. Similar results were reported by Juneja et al. [ 197 ]. However, in some studies this relation was not observed, with BCL-2 being sporadic in oral premalignant tissue [ 198 , 199 ]. On the other hand, it has been reported that there is no significant difference regarding BCL-xL expression between poorly differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and basaloid SCC [ 200 ]. Nonetheless, BCL-xL expression in OSCC is correlated with progression and resistance to Cisplatin treatment [ 201 ]. Overexpression of BCL-2 in OSCC was also found to lead to increased expression of MMP-9 and enhanced migration and invasion behavior [ 202 ]. Moreover, overexpression of BCL-2 and p53 seems to be mutually exclusive, suggesting that both genes can induce carcinogenesis in OSCC, independently [ 203 ]. Nonetheless, tumors expressing both proteins showed higher probability of presenting unfavorable characteristics [ 204 ]. Another study found higher mRNA ratios of BCL-2/BAX mostly in poorly differentiated oral carcinomas, while BAX at the protein level was downregulated in these poorly differentiated carcinomas [ 205 ]. The downregulation of BCL-2 by miR-34a was also found to inhibit sinonasal SCC migration and invasion capabilities [ 43 ].

The BCL-2 antiapoptotic family members have been found to contribute to leukemogenesis promoted by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 and bovine leukemia virus. These viruses upregulate BCL-2, BCL-xL, MCL-1, and BFL-1 while they downregulate BAX, BIM, and BID. This way infected lymphocytes can survive and proliferate, increasing genomic instability and promoting leukemogenesis [ 206 ].

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), spastic paraplegia 6 protein, a dominant autosomal HSP, is associated with disease progression since it regulates the BMPR2-SMAD-BCL-2/BCL-xL pathway [ 207 ]. Furthermore, coexpression of MYC and BCL-xL or BCL-2 can drive AML tumorigenesis [ 208 ].

In cervical cancer, tumorigenesis was found to be promoted by the lncRNA RUSC1-AS1 since it acted as a CeRNA, inhibiting miRNA-744 and leading to increased expression of BCL-2 [ 41 ].

In retinoblastoma, a correlation between BCL-2 expression and tumor invasiveness and poor differentiation was found [ 209 ].

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), follistatin-like protein 5 was shown to inhibit cancer progression by downregulating BCL-2 and upregulating BAX, BAD, and PUMA [ 210 ]. Similarly, both miR-202 and miR-448 were also found to repress HCC progression and cell growth by targeting BCL-2 [ 42 , 44 ].

BCL-xL is also involved in prostate cancer progression since a study showed that the overexpression of miR-608 which targets BCL-xL mRNA represses cancer progression, while another study demonstrated that overexpression of BCL-xL increases cancer progression by repressing senescence and apoptosis, reducing survival in vivo [ 211 , 212 ].

BCL-xL expression was also found to be necessary to promote islet tumor cells and pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer invasiveness [ 213 , 214 ].

Progression in cholangiocarcinoma is associated with aberrant alternative splicing. For instance, high expression of serine/arginine protein kinase (SRPK) 1 and SRPK2 is usually found on this type of cancer, leading to phosphorylation of SRSFs that promote antiapoptotic splicing isoforms such as MCL-1 and BCL-xL. Consequently, inhibition of SRPK1 and SRPK2 led to increased expression of MCL-1S and BCL-xS, promoting cell death [ 215 ].

PARK2 is a tumor suppressor that regulates the cell cycle and programmed cell death. In several cancers, PARK2 is usually dysregulated, resulting in increased proliferation and repression of apoptosis. It was found that PARK2 can ubiquitinate BCL-xL, and this regulation is essential for PARK2 tumor suppression activity. Since PARK2 promotes BCL-xL degradation, the dysregulation of PARK2 leads to high expression of BCL-xL and to cancer cell death prevention [ 117 ].

Both BCL-2 and BCL-xL play critical roles in tumor proliferation and invasiveness which are related with more aggressive tumors. Thus, BCL-2 and BCL-xL can be important targets in the treatment of more advanced tumors.

4.2. Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is an important process for cancer cells since it is essential for cell growth and metastasis, and BCL-2 and BCL-xL have been found to regulate this process in several types of cancer. For instance, overexpression of BCL-xL leads to increased levels of IL-8, through NF-κB activation, and consequently to the promotion of angiogenesis in melanoma and glioblastoma cells [ 216 , 217 ]. Similarly, in a zebrafish melanoma xenograft model, BCL-xL was also found to promote angiogenesis through the regulation of IL-8 [ 218 ]. Additionally, BCL-2 overexpression enhances VEGF expression by promoting PI3K and MAPK pathways signaling in cancer cells subjected to hypoxic conditions [ 219 , 220 ]. Similarly, in melanoma and breast cancer cells, increased BCL-2 expression also led to induction of angiogenesis by modulation of VEGF expression through HIF-1 and by stabilization of VEGF mRNA [ 221 , 222 ]. In lymphoma, overexpression of BCL-2 isoform β was shown to promote angiogenesis by interacting with the chaperonin T-complex protein ring complex essential for the secretion of VEGF-A and vessel tube formation [ 223 ]. In colon cancer, BCL-2 expression was reported to be correlated with VEGF expression and microvessel density which potentially suggests a role for BCL-2 in angiogenesis in this type of cancer [ 224 ].

In HCC, BCL-2 was found to interact with the transcription factor Twist1 through both its BH2 and transmembrane domains. Under hypoxic conditions these proteins are coexpressed. Their interaction increases Twist1 nuclear presence, inducing the expression of several genes such as VEGFR1, VEGFR2, MMP-2, and MMP-9 involved in processes like angiogenesis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition [ 225 ].

Angiogenesis is essential to provide oxygen and nutrients to cancer cells needed for their growth but also allows cells to escape to the bloodstream and invade other tissues. Thus, it is not surprising that BCL-2 and BCL-xL play a role in the regulation of angiogenesis since they are so important for cell invasiveness.

4.3. BCL-2 and BCL-xL Effects on Drug Responses

BCL-2 and BCL-xL are not only involved in processes vital for cancer cell survival and tumor progression but also in the resistance to treatment. For instance, BCL-2 and BCL-xL overexpression has been shown to lead to radioresistance and chemoresistance to several drugs, including Cytosine arabinoside, Cisplatin, Topotecan, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, and Paclitaxel [ 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 , 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 ].

In advanced bladder cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy, lower expression of BCL-2 led to better survival after treatment with Cisplatin than in patients with high BCL-2 expression [ 244 ]. Additionally, BCL-2 expression was associated with worse response to treatment with concurrent radiotherapy and platinum therapy in advanced oropharyngeal SCC. BCL-2, but not BCL-xL, expression was also found to induce resistance in vitro [ 245 ].

In gallbladder cancer and osteosarcoma cell lines, miR-125b was found to increase sensitivity to Cisplatin by downregulating BCL-2 [ 246 , 247 ]. Similarly, miR-204 also conferred sensibility to Cisplatin in neuroblastoma [ 248 ]. On the other hand, nicotine was found to increase resistance to Cisplatin by increasing BCL-2 expression in oral cancer [ 249 ]. In ovarian cancer, inter-α-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 3, involved in the stabilization of the extracellular matrix, downregulation increases BCL-2, BCL-xL, and MCL-1 expression after Cisplatin treatment, leading to resistance to this drug [ 250 ]. Similarly, in bladder cancer, the downregulation of genes associated with retinoid-interferon-induced mortality-19 also induced Cisplatin resistance by reducing BCL-xL polyubiquitination and degradation [ 151 ]. Suppression of BCL-xL deamidation has also been found to lead to resistance to DNA-damaging agents such as Cisplatin [ 251 , 252 ]. Cisplatin treatment in gastric cancer cells increased expression of CDK1 which in turn activated DNA methyltransferase 1, silencing miR-145. miR-145 suppression increases SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) expression and consequently BCL-xL expression since BCL-xL is a direct transcriptional target of SOX9. Increased expression of BCL-xL decreases gastric cancer cells sensitivity to Cisplatin [ 253 ]. Additionally, overexpression of miR-193a-3p in CD44 + gastric cancer cells leads to increased expression of BCL-xL and resistance to Cisplatin by targeting SRSF2 [ 254 ].

In mesothelioma cell lines, inhibition of both BCL-xL and BCL-2 increased cell sensitivity to Cisplatin [ 255 ]. However, expression of BCL-xL was found to only confer resistance to Cisplatin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells with wild type p53 since HNSCC cells with mutant p53 were sensitive to Cisplatin regardless of BCL-xL expression [ 235 ].

Moreover, knockdown of BCL-2, BCL-xL, or MCL-1 enhanced CRC cells’ sensitivity to Oxaliplatin [ 180 ]. Nonetheless, Oxaliplatin apoptosis induction occurs due to a shift in splicing from BCL-xL to BCL-xS. Oxaliplatin weakens 14-3-3ε binding to SRSF10 which dissociates from hnRNP F/H, but not hnRNP K, resulting in its dissociation from the pre-mRNA. 14-3-3ε continuous interaction with hnRNP A1 and Oxaliplatin-induced dephosphorylation of SAM68 enhance the affinity of SAM68 to hnRNPA1 which then represses RNPS1, thus promoting BCL-xS production [ 256 ]. Gfi1, a transcriptional repressor, was also shown to prevent DNA damage-induced apoptosis by repressing the transcription factor PU.1, averting Hemgn degradation. Hemgn then activates the BCL-X promoter, upregulating BCL-xL [ 257 ].

Breast cancer cell lines overexpressing BCL-2 showed increased resistance to Cisplatin and Bischloroethylnitrosourea while showing higher sensitivity to Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Vinblastine, and Actinomycin D [ 258 ].

On the other hand, in a non-Hodgkin lymphoma cell line, increased expression of HIF-1α led to resistance to treatment with Cisplatin and Doxorubicin by promoting BCL-xL expression [ 259 ]. Likewise, high expression of BCL-xL in HCC cells induces resistance to Doxorubicin. Interestingly, Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate, an antioxidant that can also inhibit NF-κB, overcame this resistance by inducing paraptosis [ 260 ]. A chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) CD44v16 cell line was also found to be resistant to Doxorubicin through the activation of the NF-κB/Snail/BCL-2 pathway [ 261 ].

Furthermore, BCL-2 positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were found to be less responsive to treatment with Cisplatin combined with Gemcitabine than BCL-2 negative ones [ 232 ]. Similarly, in resistant non-Hodgkin lymphoma, low expression of BCL-2 was predictive of a better response to treatment with Gemcitabine in combination with Cisplatin and Dexamethasone [ 262 ].

BCL-xL has been associated with Gemcitabine resistance and the addition of DT2216, a BCL-xL degrader, overcame Gemcitabine resistance both in vitro and in PDTX pancreatic cancer models [ 233 ]. Moreover, pancreatic carcinoma cells with higher BCL-2 expression showed a higher Gemcitabine 50% lethal dose than cell lines with lower BCL-2 expression [ 263 ].

One of the most common TNBC treatment options is the combination of Doxorubicin, Cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Nonetheless, in a TNBC cell line, resistance to this combinatorial approach arose from the expression of BCL-xL [ 264 ].

In CRC, paxillin, an adapter protein, was found to phosphorylate BCL-2 at Ser87, promoting its stability and leading to resistance to 5-FU [ 148 ]. BCL-xL expression was also found to confer resistance to 5-FU and radiotherapy in CRC, while inhibition of BCL-xL combined with 5-FU or radiotherapy led to synergistic effects [ 265 ]. In gastric carcinoma, miR-383 was shown to increase cell sensitivity to 5-FU by targeting BCL-2 mRNA [ 50 ]. Additionally, high expression of phosphatase phosphoglycerate mutase family member 5 (PGAM5) in HCC patients leads to resistance to treatment with 5-FU due to PGAM5 and BCL-xL interaction that promotes BCL-xL stabilization [ 266 ].

The mechanism behind BCL-2-induced resistance to DNA-damaging drugs such as Cisplatin and 5-FU is related to the Ser70 phosphorylation of BCL-2. The phosphorylation of this residue decreases the affinity of BCL-2 to the mitochondrial complex-IV subunit-5A. This interaction is essential for mitochondrial complex-IV activity and ROS production. Since Etoposide and Doxorubicin led to the reduction in Ser70 phosphorylation, resistance to these drugs was not observed [ 267 ].

Furthermore, glycochenodeoxycholate, the principal compound in the bile, also promotes BCL-2 Ser70 phosphorylation, increasing HCC cell survival and promoting chemoresistance [ 87 ]. Active GTPase-Rac1 was also found to promote BCL-2 phosphorylation at Ser70, preventing apoptosis of cancer cells [ 268 ].

On the other hand, in breast cancer, PARK2 expression confers sensitivity to antimicrotubule agents such as Docetaxel and Vinorelbine by interacting with BCL-2 phosphorylated in Ser70, promoting BCL-2 polyubiquitination and consequently its degradation. Treatment with these drugs leads to PARK2 upregulation which can then lead to degradation of BCL-2, inducing BAX activation and apoptosis [ 269 ]. Nonetheless, Docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer was shown to arise from TGF-β induction of Krüppel-like factor 5, a transcription factor, acetylation which in turn leads to BCL-2 upregulation. Moreover, TGF-β also prevents BCL-2 ubiquitination induced by Docetaxel [ 270 ].

It was also reported that phosphorylation of Thr69, Ser70, and Ser87 of BCL-2 occurs after Paclitaxel treatment. However, contrarily to the effects observed for other drugs, it is suggested that at least phosphorylation of both Ser70 and Ser87 is essential for Paclitaxel to fully induce cell death [ 147 ]. Furthermore, in breast and ovarian cancer cells, overexpression of miR-203b-3p and miR-203a-3p increased sensitivity to Paclitaxel by downregulating BCL-xL. Interestingly, c-Myc was found to promote the transcription of miR-203b-3p and miR-203a-3p in breast cancer cells [ 75 ]. Moreover, antimicrotubule agents cause cell death by inducing prolonged mitotic arrest. Cell fate of mitotic arrested cells is defined by the duration of the arrest, cyclin B1 degradation, and apoptotic signaling. For instance, high expression of BCL-xL allows for cyclin B1 degradation to reach it threshold, and the cell exits mitosis, while low expression of BCL-xL will lead to the apoptotic signaling threshold to be reached and cell death induced. An intermediate level of BCL-xL might let the cell exit mitosis but die after. Thus, BCL-xL expression can influence the sensitivity to drugs that act by causing mitotic arrest [ 271 , 272 ].

In cancer cells treated with Vinblastine, PGAM5 dephosphorylates BCL-xL at Ser62, increasing BCL-xL’s affinity to BAX and BAK to prevent cell death [ 149 ].

In CRC, PAR2/BCL-xL axis is involved in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeting resistance [ 150 ]. In addition, in EGFR -mutant lung cancer, deficiency of RBM10 was found to reduce sensitivity to EGFR targeting by reducing the BCL-xS/BCL-xL ratio [ 273 ]. Similarly, Gefitinib-resistant lung cancer cells were shown to inhibit autophagy through SRSF1 activity, which promotes production of the BCL-xL isoform. BCL-xL binds to Beclin-1 and prevents autophagy. On the other hand, under starvation conditions, SRSF1 is repressed increasing the BCL-xS/BCL-xL ratio. Beclin-1 is then free to interact with PIK3C3 and induce autophagy [ 274 ].

Furthermore, abnormal splicing of BCL-X was found to confer resistance to Imatinib in CML cells by decreasing BCL-xS/BCL-xL ratio. Restoring BCL-X splicing sensitized CML cells to Imatinib both in vitro and in vivo [ 275 ]. CML cells resistant to Imatinib were also found to overexpress methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14). METTL14 increases the m6A level at the A1001 site of the BCL-X mRNA which is then recognized by hnRNP C to induce BCL-xL expression, promoting CML progression and Imatinib resistance. Additionally, METTL4 overexpression also leads to upregulation of BCL-2 and downregulation of BAX and caspase-3 [ 276 ].

Cancer cells’ sensitivity to the splicing modulator E7107, which targets SF3b, decreased in the presence of BCL-xL. Nonetheless, no effect was observed for splicing modulator targeting SRPK or RBM39/DCAF15 potentially due to the fact that these proteins do not play a role in the splicing regulation of BCL-X mRNA [ 277 ].

In a multiple myeloma cell line with antisense p53, increased expression of BCL-2 was correlated with Dexamethasone resistance [ 278 ]. Furthermore, the expression of BCL-2 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone is associated with worse prognosis. However, addition of Rituximab to this treatment approach overcame the association of BCL-2 expression to worse prognosis [ 279 ]. In multiple myeloma, BCL-xL expression seems to be associated with resistance to treatment with Melphalan and Prednisone or Vincristine, Adriamycin, and Dexamethasone [ 280 ].

In nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, it was shown that protein S100A16 promotes resistance to Mitomycin C by increasing AKT/BCL-2 pathway signaling [ 281 ].

In AML, induction of resistance to Cytarabine is suggested to be promoted by CXCR4-facilitated repression of Let-7a expression, which induces Yin Yang 1-mediated transcriptional promotion of MYC and BCL-xL [ 282 ]. Paradoxically, a different study showed that activation of CXCR4 led to downregulation of BCL-xL and upregulation of NOXA and BAK [ 283 ].

GEX1A is a splicing modulator that in leukemic cells led to cell death by shifting MCL-1 splicing towards the pro-apoptotic isoform MCL-1S. Nonetheless, cells with high levels of BCL-xL were less responsive to GEX1A treatment [ 284 ]. Moreover, in HCC cell lines, increased expression of Let-7c, a miRNA targeting BCL-xL, potentiated the apoptotic effect of Sorafenib, a MCL-1 inhibitor [ 76 ].

In AML, administration of Flavopiridol, a CDK inhibitor, increases BCL-2 expression, and it is suggested that BCL-2 inhibition could enhance Flavopiridol efficacy [ 285 ].

High expression of BCL-xL in glioma stem cells has also been associated with increased resistance to treatment with Volasertib, a PLK1 inhibitor [ 286 ].

In TNBC, inhibition of BCL-xL synergized with CDK1/2/4 inhibitors, but not with inhibitors of the transcription factor Forkhead box M1, CDK4/6, Aurora A, and Aurora B [ 287 ]. Nonetheless, in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), resistance to the Aurora B inhibitor AZD2811 was overcome by the inhibition of BCL-2 [ 288 ]. Moreover, BCL-2 and BCL-xL were found to prevent death of MYC overexpressing cells prompted by the pan-Aurora inhibitor VX-680, but not polyploidy induction. This is achieved by the interaction of BCL-2 and BCL-xL with Beclin-1 and autophagy-related gene 6 blocking autophagy induction [ 289 ].

High expression of BCL-xL has also been associated with resistance to v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) inhibitors. BRAF is involved in the regulation of cell growth, survival, and differentiation, and its inhibition in metastatic melanoma leads to increased expression of several BCL-2 family proteins such as BCL-xL and BCL-w. Furthermore, high BCL-2 expression before treatment was inversely correlated with response to BRAF inhibition [ 290 ].

In mantle cell lymphoma, depletion of BAX and overexpression of BCL-xL both alone and in conjugation render cells resistant to treatment with the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib [ 291 ].

Argininosuccinate synthetase 1 silencing is common in several types of cancer, resulting in dependency on extracellular arginine. In this sense, arginine deprivation therapies have been explored but have shown disappointing anticancer effects. This can be explained by the fact that BCL-xL prevents apoptosis induced by this type of therapies [ 292 ].

In myeloma, high expression of BCL-2 is associated with interferon therapy resistance [ 293 ]. Moreover, lower expression of BCL-2 predicts worse prognosis in adjuvant endocrine therapy-treated ER-positive breast cancer patients [ 294 ].

ER stress inducers, in HCC, led to the upregulation of GOLGA2P10, a lncRNA, and consequently to increased BCL-xL expression and BAX phosphorylation preventing cell death [ 295 ].

Furthermore, in PDAC, collagen XI/αI is associated with resistance to treatment by inducing the AKT/CREB/BCL-2 pathway, which leads to increased expression of BCL-2 and decreased activity of BAX, thus inhibiting apoptosis [ 296 ].

The RNA helicase DHX33 in association with activating protein 2β was shown to promote cancer cell survival by increasing BCL-2 mRNA expression [ 297 ].

In CRC, RASSF4 expression is usually downregulated. RASSF4 regulates BCL-2 expression through YAP and its lower expression in CRC induces cell proliferation and drug resistance [ 298 ].

CML cells expressing BCR-ABL were shown to repress apoptosis induced by chemotherapy through the promotion of STAT5 activity that leads to increased expression of BCL-xL [ 299 , 300 ].

Moreover, in melanoma, expression of BCL-2 was associated with resistance to biochemotherapy by repressing apoptosis induction [ 301 ].

In patients with operable carcinoma of the breast, low BCL-2 expression is predictive of pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy [ 302 ].

However, BCL-2 expression can also confer sensitivity to some drugs. For instance, high expression of BCL-2 in non-germinal-center B-cell-like DLBCL was also associated with better response to Zanubrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor [ 303 ]. Moreover, postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer patients led to a better outcome in high BCL-2 expression patients [ 304 ]. Similarly, in HNSCC, BCL-2-positive patients also had better response to radiotherapy than BCL-2 negative patients [ 305 ].

However, BCL-2 positive prostate cancer patients showed increased failure to radiotherapy treatment. Additionally, the group who showed worse failure to treatment was the BCL-2 positive group with abnormal expression of BAX [ 306 ]. In human glioma, miR-153-3p was found to increase radiosensitivity by targeting BCL-2 expression [ 307 ]. Treatment with the BCL-xL inhibitor A1331852 also radiosensitized mesothelioma cells [ 308 ]. Accordingly, in laryngeal cancer, expression of both BCL-2 and BCL-xL was associated with radioresistance [ 309 ]. In CRC overexpression of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 4, a E3 ligase, led to radioresistance through the activation of JNK/c-Jun and consequent increase in BCL-xL expression [ 310 ]. Moreover, in malignant glioma and pancreatic cells, BCL-xL expression was also associated with radioresistance [ 311 , 312 ]. In prostate cancer patients, BCL-2 was found to be overexpressed in patients who failed brachytherapy compared to patients who responded to treatment [ 313 ].

Prostate cancer patients BCL-2 negative and with normal BAX showed high response to treatment with androgen deprivation combined with radiotherapy. The predictive value of negative BCL-2 and normal BAX was more pronounced for short-term androgen deprivation than for long-term [ 314 ]. On the other hand, BCL-2-positive prostate cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy showed better prognosis than BCL-2-negative ones [ 315 ].

Furthermore, prostate cancer cells overexpressing BCL-2 are susceptible to Poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition combined with radiotherapy. Overexpression of BCL-2 blocks Ku80 from entering the nucleus. Ku80 is essential for the non-homologous end joining DNA repair pathway. Thus, BCL-2 overexpressing cells depend on the alternative PARP1-dependent end-joining pathway to repair DNA double-strand breaks, making them susceptible to PARP inhibition [ 316 ].

Another common mechanism that allows cancer cells to survive therapy is through the induction of senescence. For instance, in melanoma cells, a combination of an inhibitor of Aurora A, which promotes senescence, and a BCL-xL inhibitor led to enhanced treatment efficacy. BCL-xL represses BAX, maintaining p53 activation which in turn promotes p21-mediated senescence. When BCL-xL is inhibited p21 is degraded by caspases and the apoptotic pathway is induced [ 317 ]. Accordingly, BCL-xL has been described to promote senescence in several types of cancer [ 56 ].

Treatment with Palbociclib or bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) protein inhibitors can induce senescence, leading to resistance to these drugs. For instance, Palbociclib-induced melanoma senescent cells showed a reduction in HRK and BIM expression and increased BCL-xL:BAK affinity, preventing apoptosis [ 318 ]. Similarly, TNBC BET inhibitors-induced senescent cells present higher levels of BCL-xL, and its inhibition leads to increased sensitivity to BET inhibitors [ 319 ].

Moreover, in PDAC, BCL-xL was found to protect cells exposed to a microenvironment scarce in oxygen and nutrients by repressing cell cycle progression [ 320 ]. An acidic microenvironment also leads to the upregulation of BCL-2 and BCL-xL by MEK/ERK activity promoted by G protein-coupled receptor 65 which acts as an acid sensor [ 321 ]. Overexpression of BCL-2 and BCL-xL is largely linked to increased resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Therefore, combining standard treatments with BCL-2 and BCL-xL inhibitors may help overcome this resistance and improve drug efficacy and patient outcomes.

5. BCL-2 and BCL-xL Expression in Cancer Across TCGA and CPTAC Datasets Using UALCAN Analysis

Given the central roles of BCL-2 and BCL-xL in cancer-related processes and drug resistance, we used the UALCAN webtool to assess BCL-2 and BCL-xL mRNA and protein expression levels across multiple cancer types compared with normal tissues ( Table 3 and Table 4 ). At the mRNA level, BCL-2 upregulation was observed in all kidney cancer types analyzed, as well as in cholangiocarcinoma and HCC, but no upregulation was observed at protein level. Conversely, BCL-2 mRNA was downregulated in bladder urothelial carcinoma, breast invasive carcinoma, cervical SCC, colon adenocarcinoma, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, lung SCC, prostate adenocarcinoma, rectum adenocarcinoma, stomach adenocarcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma, while at the protein level it was downregulated in breast cancer and HCC.

On the other hand, BCL-xL was upregulated in bladder urothelial carcinoma, breast invasive carcinoma, cervical SCC, cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma, HNSCC, kidney chromophobe, renal papillary cell carcinoma, HCC, prostate adenocarcinoma, rectum adenocarcinoma, stomach adenocarcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma at the mRNA level and in ovarian and colon cancers, uterine corpus endometrial adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma at the protein level. Conversely, BCL-xL was downregulated at the mRNA level in lung SCC, and at the protein level in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, lung SCC, and HNSCC.

Nonetheless, it is important to note that the UALCAN webtool does not distinguish between BCL-xL and BCL-xS isoforms, as the search is based on the gene ( BCL2L1 ) and not the protein.

6. Co-Targeting of BCL-2 and BCL-xL in Clinical Trials

Due to their roles in cancer progression and also in resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy, several dual BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibitors have been designed and assessed in clinical trials across a wide spectrum of malignancies, including HCC, lung cancer, melanoma, and ovarian cancer ( Table 5 ) [ 322 ].

Navitoclax (ABT-263), a BH3-mimetic that targets BCL-2, BCL-xL, and BCL-w, has been the most extensively investigated agent of this class. Early phase I trials in hematologic and solid tumors demonstrated antitumor activity with manageable toxicity profiles [ 323 , 324 , 325 ].

In SCLC and other solid tumors, Navitoclax induced partial responses or stable disease in a minority of patients, though severe adverse events (AEs) such as fatal respiratory failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and asymptomatic lipase elevation were occasionally reported [ 308 ]. In relapsed or refractory CLL, partial responses were observed, but hematologic toxicities, especially thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, were frequent, establishing a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 200 mg/day with intermittent dosing [ 309 ].

A phase 2 study in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies treated with Navitoclax corroborated these findings even though clinical activity was only observed in a minority of these patients [ 326 ]. Nonetheless, two phase 2 trials showed that Navitoclax alone had limited activity against advanced and recurrent SCLC and ovarian cancer [ 327 , 328 ].

Combinatorial approaches with Navitoclax have also been investigated, and in patients with solid tumors the combination of Gemcitabine and Navitoclax was deemed safe but produced mostly stable disease, while the combination of Navitoclax and Docetaxel was also tolerable and showed clinical activity with partial responses in a subset of patients [ 329 , 330 ].

Navitoclax plus Trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, was also deemed safe and led to durable responses, and a recommended phase II dose was established [ 331 ].

The phase II recommended dose could not be achieved with the combination of Navitoclax and Erlotinib while a study investigating Navitoclax with Cisplatin and Paclitaxel was discontinued due to high toxicity and low clinical activity [ 332 , 333 ]. Nonetheless, Navitoclax with Paclitaxel showed moderate activity. The addition of irinotecan to Navitoclax resulted in partial responses. However, grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 77.4% of patients [ 334 ].

In NSCLC, Navitoclax combined with Osimertinib, an EGFR inhibitor, was also tolerable with clinical efficacy [ 335 ]. Early studies pairing Navitoclax with Vistusertib, an mTOR inhibitor, or Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, also indicated manageable safety but minimal objective responses [ 336 , 337 ].

In a phase 2 study with patients with myelofibrosis, Navitoclax combined to Ruxolitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and 2, led to significantly improved spleen volume and symptom burden even though the median overall survival (OS) was not met [ 338 ]. A phase I trial in relapsed/refractory CD20+ lymphoid malignancies exploring the combination of Navitoclax with Rituximab, a CD20 inhibitor, demonstrated multiple complete and partial responses, even though grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 17% of patients [ 339 ]. In B-cell CLL, the same combination was well tolerated and led to higher response rates and prolonged progression-free survival [ 340 ]. Navitoclax with Venetoclax and chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma achieved objective responses but were limited by grade 3/4 myelosuppression [ 341 ].

Additional trials in different cancer types evaluating Navitoclax with other agents, including Ketoconazole ( NCT01021358 ), Etoposide plus Cisplatin ( NCT00878449 ), Olaparib ( NCT05358639 ), Rifampin ( NCT01121133 ), Venetoclax plus cladribine-based salvage therapy ( NCT06007911 ), Venetoclax with Decitabine ( NCT05455294 , NCT05222984 , NCT05740449 ), Venetoclax ( NCT05215405 , NCT05192889 , NCT05054465 ), Ruxolitinib with or without Mivebresib ( NCT04041050 , NCT04480086 ), Ruxolitinib plus ABBV-744 ( NCT04454658 ), Ruxolitinib ( NCT04472598 , NCT04468984 ), Fludarabine plus Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab or Bendamustine plus Rituximab ( NCT00868413 ), Dabrafenib plus Trametinib ( NCT01989585 ), Venetoclax plus Ibrutinib and Rituximab ( NCT05864742 ), Abiraterone acetate with or without Hydroxychloroquine ( NCT01828476 ), and Bendamustine plus Rituximab ( NCT01423539 ), were terminated with no results published, ongoing or were withdrawn.

Obatoclax mesylate, also known as GX15-070, is an inhibitor of BCL-2, BCL-xL, BCL-w, and MCL-1. This drug has also been tested in multiple clinical contexts. Phase I studies in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors demonstrated limited efficacy but acceptable safety, characterized mainly by neurological and psychiatric AEs, including somnolence and dizziness [ 342 , 343 , 344 ]. In AML, a few patients achieved stable disease while in myelodysplastic syndromes, no objective response was observed [ 345 , 346 ]. In myelofibrosis, hematologic improvement was observed in only one patient, whereas in Hodgkin’s lymphoma, the insufficient clinical responses led to a decision against further enrollment [ 347 , 348 ]. Other trials exploring Obatoclax mesylate in hematologic malignancies ( NCT00438178 ) and systemic mastocytosis ( NCT00918931 ) were completed with no published results.

Combination strategies with Obatoclax improved outcomes in certain settings. When added to Carboplatin/Etoposide in extensive-stage SCLC, it increased objective response rates to 62% vs. 53% for chemotherapy alone, without introducing unexpected toxicity [ 349 , 350 ]. In CLL, combination with Fludarabine and Rituximab produced complete and partial responses; however, neuropsychiatric effects were frequent [ 351 ]. In solid tumors and relapsed SCLC, the association with Topotecan achieved stable disease or partial responses, with hematologic and neurologic toxicity as primary limitations [ 352 , 353 ]. The combination with Bortezomib in mantle cell lymphoma yielded complete or partial responses in some patients, while association with Docetaxel in NSCLC achieved partial and stable responses, with frequent grade 3/4 neutropenia [ 354 , 355 ]. Other trials combining Obatoclax with Bortezomib ( NCT00538187 , NCT00719901 ), Vincristine/Doxorubicin/Dexrazoxane ( NCT00933985 ), Rituximab with or without Bendamustine ( NCT01238146 , NCT00427856 ), and Carboplatin plus Etoposide ( NCT01563601 ) were withdrawn, or completed without published results.

AT-101, also known as oral gossypol, is an orally bioavailable pan-BCL-2 inhibitor with activity against BCL-2 and BCL-xL that has also undergone extensive evaluation. Administration of AT-101 to refractory metastatic breast cancer patients led to a minor response and two patients achieving stable disease. Two out of the three patients receiving 50 mg/day had grade III dermatologic toxicity which was dose limiting. The MTD for this drug was 40 mg/day [ 356 ].

In castration-resistant prostate cancer, AT-101 demonstrated limited activity accompanied by gastrointestinal AEs, while in castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, nearly one-third of patients achieved undetectable PSA levels [ 357 , 358 ]. Studies in glioblastoma multiforme yielded mostly stable disease, and activity was minimal in SCLC and adrenocortical carcinoma [ 359 , 360 , 361 ]. Trials in B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma ( NCT05338931 ) remain ongoing, whereas one in relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies ( NCT00275431 ) was completed with no published results.

Combination regimens have shown comparatively better outcomes. AT-101 with Paclitaxel/Carboplatin produced objective responses in advanced solid tumors, and with Cisplatin/Etoposide achieved partial responses in approximately 15% of patients [ 362 , 363 ]. In gastroesophageal carcinoma, AT-101 combined with Docetaxel, 5-FU, and radiotherapy yielded high complete response rates [ 364 ]. In relapsed/refractory SCLC, combination with Topotecan induced partial and stable responses despite hematologic toxicity [ 365 ]. In head and neck cancer, AT-101 plus Docetaxel produced partial and stable responses, with lymphopenia as the main grade 3/4 AE [ 366 ]. In NSCLC, combinations with Docetaxel alone or Docetaxel plus Cisplatin resulted in disease stabilization in most patients, with neutropenia and anemia as the most common grade ≥ 3 AEs [ 367 , 368 ]. In laryngeal cancer, AT-101 with Docetaxel and platinum agents achieved partial responses in over half of treated patients [ 369 ]. The administration of AT-101, Docetaxel, and Prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer resulted in a median OS of 18.1 months; however, significant myelosuppression was observed [ 370 ]. A trial combining AT-101 with Erlotinib in NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations ( NCT00988169 ) showed limited activity. Additionally, studies testing AT-101 with Temozolomide with or without radiotherapy ( NCT00390403 ), Erlotinib ( NCT00934076 ), Lenalidomide ( NCT01003769 [ 296 ]), and Rituximab ( NCT00286780 , NCT00440388 ) were withdrawn or terminated with no published results.

Pelcitoclax, also known as APG-1252, is a dual BCL-2 and BCL-xL inhibitor that is being explored in several clinical trials. The results of the first clinical trial exploring Pelcitoclax in locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors led to three partial responses, one in SCLC, one in ovarian cancer, and another in a patient with neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Moreover, 11 patients achieved stable disease, leading to an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 30.4%. The recommended dose for further trials was a weekly dose of 240 mg of Pelcitoclax which in this trial led to a DCR of 50%. The regime was also found to be tolerable with the most common AEs being transaminase elevations and thrombocytopenia [ 371 ]. There are currently three active trials investigating Pelcitoclax: its combination with Cobimetinib in recurrent ovarian and endometrial cancers ( NCT05691504 ), with Osimertinib in EGFR-TKI–resistant NSCLC ( NCT04001777 ), and its use alone or with Chidamide in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma ( NCT05186012 ). In contrast, three monotherapy trials in SCLC or advanced solid tumors ( NCT03387332 ), advanced neuroendocrine tumors ( NCT04893759 ), and myelofibrosis after prior therapy ( NCT04354727 ), as well as one evaluating Pelcitoclax plus Paclitaxel in relapsed/refractory SCLC ( NCT04210037 ), were terminated or withdrawn without any published results.

More recently, AZD0466, a novel dual BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibitor which consists of a drug conjugate of AZD4320 and a DEP ® G5 poly-L-lysine dendrimer, entered early-phase clinical development. Trials in advanced hematologic or solid tumors ( NCT04214093 ) were initiated, as well as studies evaluating AZD0466 combined with Voriconazole ( NCT04865419 ) and with other anticancer agents in non-Hodgkin lymphoma ( NCT05205161 ). One clinical trial was terminated with no published results, and the other two were terminated based on benefit–risk profile assessment.

Besides the limited efficacy observed with dual BCL-2 and BCL-xL inhibition as monotherapy, toxicity and the possibility of cancer cells to develop resistance are other major concerns for this type of inhibitors. Navitoclax, for example, is associated with neutropenia and dose-limiting thrombocytopenia since neutrophil progenitors and platelets are dependent on BCL-2 and BCL-xL, respectively, for their survival [ 372 , 373 ]. To mitigate thrombocytopenia, AZD4320 was developed; however, it exhibited dose-limiting cardiovascular toxicity in preclinical studies [ 372 , 374 ]. The drug-dendrimer conjugate AZD0466 was subsequently designed to overcome this limitation and showed comparable efficacy to AZD4320 with reduced toxicity, but clinical trials evaluating AZD0466 were terminated without published results [ 374 ].

Moreover, cancer cells can acquire resistance to BCL-2 and BCL-xL inhibitors through compensatory survival pathways. For instance, increased expression of MCL-1 and BFL-1 was found to be associated with resistance to ABT-737, a dual BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibitor [ 375 ]. In lymphoid and leukemic cells, Navitoclax resistance arises from high MCL-1 expression, while cells with high BCL-2 and NOXA mRNA levels show higher sensitivity to this drug [ 376 ].

Furthermore, BIM has been shown to interact with BCL-2 and BCL-xL through both its BH3 domain and C-terminal region. When both regions are connected to BCL-2 or BCL-xL, a mechanism known as double-bolt locking, displacement of these proteins is hindered, leading to resistance to Navitoclax and potentially to other BH3 mimetics [ 377 ].

Despite these limitations, clinical findings collectively indicate that these agents can enhance apoptotic signaling and overcome tumor cells’ resistance to several drugs [ 227 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 378 ]. Thus, not only could the targeting of BCL-2 pro-survival family members potentially promote cancer cells death through increased apoptotic signaling, but it also could potentially overcome resistance and increase the therapeutic potential of other drugs. Nevertheless, continued development of novel BCL-2 and BCL-xL–targeting strategies is essential to try and minimize toxicity, circumvent resistance mechanisms, and fully explore their therapeutic potential, particularly in combination regimens.

Table 5
Clinical trials exploring BCL-2 and BCL-xL inhibitors in the treatment of cancer.

DrugDiseaseInterventionPhaseResultsNCT/References
NavitoclaxLymphomasNavitoclaxPhase IComplete with no published resultsNCT00743028
Lymphoid malignancies and solid tumorsNavitoclaxPhase IComplete with no published resultsNCT00982566
Lymphoid malignanciesNavitoclaxPhase IOf the 46 patients analyzed, 10 showed partial response. The most common non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs was pneumonia (11%).NCT00406809 [ 323 ]
SCLC and other solid tumorsNavitoclaxPhase IOf the 38 patients analyzed, 8 showed stable disease and 1 a partial response. Serious AEs were reported in 3 patients (fatal respiratory failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction and asymptomatic lipase elevation).[ 324 ]
Relapsed or refractory CLLNavitoclaxPhase IAmong 29 patients, 7 achieved stable disease and 9 had a partial response. The MTD with intermittent dosing was estimated at 200 mg/day. Serious adverse events included grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia ( n = 8), neutropenia ( n = 8), tumor lysis syndrome ( n = 1), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy ( n = 1), and myocardial infarction ( n = 1).NCT00481091 [ 325 ]
Relapsed or refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndromeNavitoclaxPhase Ib/IIActive, not recruitingNCT05564650
CLLNavitoclaxPhase IIComplete with no published resultsNCT01557777
Relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignanciesNavitoclaxPhase IIaAll patients discontinued Navitoclax due to AEs and radiologic progressive disease.NCT00406809 [ 326 ]
Heavily pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancerNavitoclaxPhase IIOf the 46 patients analyzed, 15 showed stable disease and 1 a partial response. The most common grade 3/4 AEs was thrombocytopenia (26%).NCT02591095 [ 328 ]
Relapsed SCLCNavitoclaxPhase IIOf the 39 patients analyzed, 9 showed stable disease and 1 a partial response. The most common AEs was thrombocytopenia (41%).NCT00445198 [ 327 ]
Relapsed or refractory B-cell CLLNavitoclaxPhase IIbWithdrawn since the sponsor decided to not proceed with the studyNCT00918450
Lymphoma and solid tumorsNavitoclax with KetoconazolePhase IComplete with no published resultsNCT01021358
SCLCNavitoclax plus Etoposide and CisplatinPhase IComplete with no published resultsNCT00878449
High grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer and TNBCNavitoclax and OlaparibPhase IActive, not recruitingNCT05358639
Lymphoma and solid tumorsNavitoclax with RifampinPhase IComplete with no published resultsNCT01121133
Relapsed/refractory AMLNavitoclax and Venetoclax with Cladribine-based salvage therapyPhase IWithdrawn since sponsor withdrew supportNCT06007911
Advanced myeloid neoplasmsNavitoclax, Venetoclax and DecitabinePhase IActive, not recruitingNCT05455294
Relapsed/refractory AMLNavitoclax in combination with Venetoclax and DecitabinePhase IbActive, not recruitingNCT05222984
Pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory hematological malignanciesNavitoclax in combination with Venetoclax and DecitabinePhase I/IIWithdrawn since company stopped development and production of one of the investigational medicinal products.NCT05740449
Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasmsNavitoclax alone or in combination with RuxolitinibPhase IActive, not recruitingNCT04041050
MyelofibrosisNavitoclax, Ruxolitinib and Mivebresib vs. Mivebresib alonePhase IbTerminated with no published resultsNCT04480086
MyelofibrosisNavitoclax, Ruxolitinib and ABBV-744 vs. ABBV-744 alonePhase IbActive, not recruitingNCT04454658
MyelofibrosisNavitoclax with RuxolitinibPhase II23–31% of the patients achieved a ≥35% spleen volume reduction and 24–30% a ≥50% total symptom score reduction. The most common AEs was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%).NCT03222609 [ 338 , 379 , 380 ]
Relapsed/refractory myelofibrosisNavitoclax with RuxolitinibPhase IIIActive, not recruitingNCT04472598 NCT04468984
Advanced solid tumorsNavitoclax and VistusertibPhase ITreatment was well tolerated at dose level 1 (Navitoclax 150 mg once daily plus Vistusertib 35 mg twice daily). A serious AE, grade 3 serum aminotransferase elevation, occurred in 2 patients at dose level 2.NCT03366103 [ 336 ]
Relapsed or refractory solid tumorsNavitoclax and SorafenibPhase IThe MTD was Navitoclax 150 mg daily plus Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. Stable disease was observed in 6 patients, with no partial or complete responses. The most common grade 3 toxicity was thrombocytopenia ( n = 5).NCT01364051 NCT02143401 [ 337 ]
Solid tumorsNavitoclax combined with GemcitabinePhase IOf the 46 patients analyzed, 21 showed stable disease. No complete or partial response was observed. The MTD was Navitoclax 325 mg plus Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 . The most common AEs were thrombocytopenia 58.7%), nausea (58.7%), and fatigue (56.5%).NCT00887757 [ 329 ]
Advanced solid tumorsNavitoclax in combination with ErlotinibPhase IAmong 11 patients, 3 showed stable disease with no complete or partial responses. The MTD was not reached. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were diarrhea (36%), syncope (18%), and thrombocytopenia (9%).NCT01009073 [ 332 ]
Advanced solid tumorsNavitoclax with IrinotecanPhase IAmong 31 patients, 2 had partial responses. The MTD in a once-weekly regimen group was Navitoclax 150 mg plus Irinotecan 75 mg/m 2 . Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 77.4% of patients, mostly diarrhea (35.5%).NCT01009073 [ 334 ]
Relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphomaNavitoclax and Venetoclax combined with chemotherapyPhase IAmong 47 patients, 3 showed complete response, 8 a partial response, and 8 showed stable disease. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were febrile neutropenia (46.8%), neutropenia (38.3%), and thrombocytopenia (25.5%).NCT03181126 [ 341 ]
Advanced solid tumorsNavitoclax plus DocetaxelPhase IOf the 41 patients analyzed, 4 showed a partial response. The MTD was Navitoclax 150 mg days 1–5 every 21 days combined with Docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 day 1. The most common AEs included thrombocytopenia (63%), fatigue (61%), nausea (59%) and neutropenia (51%).NCT00888108 [ 330 ]
Solid tumorsNavitoclax plus Carboplatin and PaclitaxelPhase IAmong 19 patients, 1 showed a partial response. The study was discontinued due to significant hematological and non-hematological toxicities.NCT00891605 [ 333 ]
Relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemiaNavitoclax plus Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab or Bendamustine and RituximabPhase IComplete with no published resultsNCT00868413
Relapsed or refractory CD20+ lymphoid malignanciesNavitoclax in combination with RituximabPhase IAmong 29 patients, 5 showed complete responses and 5 showed partial responses. The MTD of Navitoclax was 250 mg/day. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 17% of patients, and common adverse events included mild diarrhea (79%) and nausea (72%).NCT00788684 [ 339 ]
B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemiaNavitoclax with RituximabPhase IIOf the 78 patients analyzed, 2 showed complete responses, 47 showed partial responses, and 25 showed stable disease. Serious AEs were reported and included neutropenia (37.2%), and thrombocytopenia (25.6%).NCT01087151 [ 340 ]
EGFR-mutant NSCLCNavitoclax plus OsimertinibPhase IbAmong 27 patients, 2 showed partial responses, and 12 showed stable disease. The recommended phase 2 dose was Osimertinib 80 mg plus Navitoclax 150 mg daily. The most common AEs were thrombocytopenia (37%), lymphopenia (37%), fatigue (22%), and nausea (22%).NCT02520778 [ 335 ]
Pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphomaNavitoclax and Venetoclax-No results publishedNCT05215405
Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemiaNavitoclax and VenetoclaxPhase I/IIActive not recruitingNCT05192889
High-risk patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemiaNavitoclax and VenetoclaxPhase Ib/IINot yet recruitingNCT05054465
KRAS or NRAS mutant advanced solid tumorsNavitoclax and TrametinibPhase I/IIAmong 91 patients, 8 showed partial responses. The recommended phase 2 dose was Trametinib 2 mg daily (days 1–14) plus Navitoclax 250 mg daily (days 1–28). The most common AEs included diarrhea (72.9%), decreased platelet count (70.6%) and increased AST (68.2%).NCT02079740 [ 331 ]
BRAF mutant melanoma and other solid tumorsNavitoclax with Dabrafenib and TrametinibPhase I/IIActive not recruitingNCT01989585
Relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphomaNavitoclax plus Venetoclax, Ibrutinib and Rituximab vs. Venetoclax, Ibrutinib and RituximabPhase IIActive not recruitingNCT05864742
Progressive metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancerNavitoclax and Abiraterone acetate with or without HydroxychloroquinePhase IITerminated due to investigator leaving the organizationNCT01828476
Relapsed DLBCLNavitoclax plus Bendamustine and RituximabPhase IITerminated due to non-safety related reasonsNCT01423539
Obatoclax MesylateHematological malignanciesObatoclax mesylatePhase ICompleted with no published resultsNCT00438178
Advanced hematologic malignanciesObatoclaxPhase IOf the 44 patients analyzed, 1 showed a complete response and 3 showed hematologic improvement. Obatoclax mesylate was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common AEs were somnolence (43%), dizziness (38%), and fatigue (36%).[ 342 ]
Advanced CLLObatoclaxPhase IOf the 26 patients analyzed, 1 showed a partial response. The MTD was 28 mg/m 2 over 3 h every 3 weeks. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were somnolence, ataxia, and confusion.NCT00600964 [ 343 ]
Advanced solid tumors or lymphomaObatoclaxPhase IOf the 35 patients analyzed, 1 showed a partial response and 1 showed stable disease. The MTD was 1.25 mg/m 2 for the 1 h infusion and 20 mg/m 2 for the 3 h infusion. The most common AEs were somnolence (91%), dizziness (60%), and euphoric mood (57%).[ 344 ]
Previously untreated AMLObatoclax mesylatePhase I/IIAmong 18 patients, 4 had stable disease, with no complete responses. The MTD was 20 mg/day administered over 3 h for 3 consecutive days. The most common AEs were neurologic (77.8%) or psychiatric (88.9%).NCT00684918 [ 345 ]
Systemic mastocytosisObatoclaxPhase IINo reported responses 3 months after treatmentNCT00918931
MyelofibrosisObatoclax mesylatePhase IIAmong 22 patients, 1 showed clinical improvement in hemoglobin and platelets, with no complete or partial responses. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (9%), dyspnea (9%), and febrile neutropenia (9%).NCT00360035 [ 347 ]
Hodgkin’s lymphomaObatoclaxPhase IIAmong 13 patients, 5 had stable disease, with no objective responses. Further enrollment was not pursued due to limited clinical activity.NCT00359892 [ 348 ]
Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with anemia or thrombocytopeniaObatoclaxPhase IIAmong 24 patients, 17 had stable disease, with no complete or partial responses. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were anemia (21%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and pneumonia (13%).NCT00413114 [ 346 ]
Aggressive relapsed or recurrent non-Hodgkin lymphomaObatoclax and BortezomibPhase ITerminated with no resultsNCT00538187
Relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphoma, or leukemiaObatoclax mesylate, Vincristine sulfate, Doxorubicin hydrochloride and Dexrazoxane hydrochloridePhase ITerminated with no resultsNCT00933985
Extensive-stage SCLCObatoclax in combination with Carboplatin and EtoposidePhase IAmong 25 patients, 17 had complete or partial responses. The MTD of Obatoclax was 30 mg/day for the 3 h infusion. The most common AEs included neutropenia (96%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (72%).[ 349 ]
Extensive-stage SCLCObatoclax mesylate with Carboplatin and Etoposide vs. Carboplatin and EtoposidePhase IIAmong 155 patients, the objective response rate was 62% with Carboplatin/Etoposide plus Obatoclax and 53% with Carboplatin/Etoposide alone. Clinical benefit was 81% vs. 68%. Common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (46.5%), anemia (21%), and thrombocytopenia (16.5%).NCT00682981 [ 350 ]
Relapsed CLLObatoclax in combination with Fludarabine and RituximabPhase IAmong 13 patients, 2 had complete responses and 9 had partial responses. No MTD was reached. Common adverse events included dizziness (46%), euphoria (46%), and ataxia (38%).NCT00612612 [ 351 ]
Solid tumor malignanciesObatoclax combined with TopotecanPhase IOf the 14 patients analyzed, 2 showed partial responses and 4 showed stable disease. The MTD of Obatoclax was 20 mg/m 2 . The most common grade 3/4 AEs were anemia (21.4%), and thrombocytopenia (14.3%).[ 352 ]
Relapsed SCLCObatoclax combined with TopotecanPhase IIOf the 9 patients analyzed, 5 showed stable disease. No partial or complete responses were observed. The MTD of Obatoclax was 20 mg/m 2 . Common grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (11%), neutropenia (11%), and ataxia (11%).NCT00521144 [ 353 ]
Relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomaObatoclax mesylate, Rituximab, and Bendamustine hydrochloridePhase I/IIWithdrawn due to no patients accruedNCT01238146
Relapsed or refractory multiple myelomaObatoclax plus BortezomibPhase I/IITrial termination was attributed to insufficient enrollment and drug supplyNCT00719901
Relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphomaObatoclax mesylate plus BortezomibPhase I/IIOf the 13 patients analyzed, 3 showed complete responses, 1 showed a partial response, and 6 showed stable disease. Grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (21%), anemia (13%), and fatigue (13%).NCT00407303 [ 354 ]
Relapsed non–small-cell lung cancerObatoclax in combination with DocetaxelPhase I/IIOf the 32 patients analyzed, 3 showed partial responses and 2 showed stable disease. The MTD was not reached. The most common grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (31%), febrile neutropenia (16%), and dyspnea (19%).NCT00405951 [ 355 ]
Previously untreated follicular lymphomaObatoclax mesylate with or without RituximabPhase IIAmong 13 patients, 3 had complete responses, 1 had a partial response, and 6 had stable disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (21%), anemia (13%), and fatigue (13%).NCT00427856
Chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancerObatoclax mesylate combined with Carboplatin and Etoposide vs. Carboplatin and EtoposidePhase IIIWithdrawn due to business decisionNCT01563601
AT-101Relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomaAT-101Phase I/IICurrently recruitingNCT05338931
Refractory metastatic breast cancerAT-101Phase I/IIGrade III dose limiting dermatologic AEs were observed in two patients receiving 50 mg/day of AT-101. Stable disease was reported for 2 of the 20 patients analyzed in this study. A minor response was also reported. Moreover, the MTD was achieved (40 mg/day).[ 356 ]
Castrate-resistant prostate cancerAT-101Phase I/IIOf the 23 patients analyzed, 2 showed stable disease. Grade 3 small intestinal obstruction occurred in 21.7% of patients, while common AEs included diarrhea (43.5%), fatigue (34.8%), nausea (21.7%), and anorexia (21.7%).NCT00286806 [ 357 ]
Castration sensitive metastatic prostate cancerAT-101Phase IIOf the 55 patients analyzed, 17 (31%) achieved an undetectable PSA level (≤0.2 ng/mL). Serious AEs were reported in 22% of patients, and included sensory neuropathy (4%), and ileus (3.7%).NCT00666666 [ 358 ]
Relapsed or refractory B-cell malignanciesAT-101Phase IIComplete with no published resultsNCT00275431
Newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma multiformeAT-101Phase IIAmong 71 patients, 1 had a partial response and 16 had stable disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included gastrointestinal symptoms. All patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme died at the time of data analysis.NCT00540722 NCT00390403 [ 359 ]
Recurrent extensive stage SCLCAT-101Phase IIOf the 15 patients analyzed, 3 showed stable disease. No complete or partial responses were observed. Grade 3/4 AEs included anorexia (20%), fatigue (13.3%) and nausea (13.3%).[ 360 ]
Advanced adrenal cortical carcinomaAT-101Phase IIOf the 29 patients analyzed, 8 showed stable disease. No complete or partial responses were observed. The most commom grade 4 AEs were hypokalemia (10.3%), cardiac troponin elevation (3.4%), and lymphopenia (3.4%).[ 361 ]
Newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiformeAT-101 and Temozolomide with or without radiotherapyPhase ICompleted with no published resultsNCT00390403
Solid tumorsAT-101 with Paclitaxel and CarboplatinPhase IOf the 24 patients analyzed, 1 showed a complete response and 4 showed partial responses, and 8 showed stable disease. The MTD was not reached. Grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (21%), leukopenia (13%), anemia (4%), and thrombocytopenia (4%).NCT00891072 [ 362 ]
Advanced solid tumorsAT-101 with Cisplatin and EtoposidePhase IOf the 27 patients analyzed, 4 showed partial responses, and l0 demonstrated stable disease. The MTD of AT-101 was 40 mg orally twice daily on days 1–3, administered with Cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 and Etoposide 120 mg/m 2 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, supported by Pegfilgrastim. The most common grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (59.3%), and leukopenia (44.4%).[ 363 ]
Advanced NSCLCAT-101 with ErlotinibPhase IWithdrawn with no published resultsNCT00934076
Advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR activating mutationsAT-101 with ErlotinibPhase IIOf the 5 patients analyzed, 3 showed stable disease and 1 a partial response. A serious adverse event was reported in 1 patient (hypotension)NCT00988169
Relapsed B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemiaLenalidomide and AT-101Phase I/IIOf the 13 patients analyzed, 11 showed complete response. The most common AEs were gastrointestinal, including vomiting, anorexia, and odynophagia.NCT01003769 [ 381 ]
Gastroesophageal carcinomaAT-101 with Docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapyPhase I/IIOf the 36 patients analyzed, 3 showed partial responses and 15 showed stable disease. No complete response was observed. The most common AEs grade ≥ 3 were neutropenia (44.4%), thrombocytopenia (41.7%), and anemia (27.8%).NCT00561197 [ 364 ]
Relapsed and refractory SCLCAT-101 with TopotecanPhase I/IIOf the 13 patients analyzed, 11 showed complete response. The most common AEs were gastrointestinal, including vomiting, anorexia, and odynophagia.NCT00397293 [ 365 ]
CLLAT-101 plus RituximabPhase IICompleted with no published resultsNCT00286780
Grade I-II follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphomaAT-101 combined with RituximabPhase IICompleted with no published resultsNCT00440388
Recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic HNCAT-101 in combination with DocetaxelPhase IIOf the 11 evaluable patients, 1 showed partial responses and 6 showed stable disease. No complete response was observed. The most grade 3/4 AEs was lymphopenia (36.4%).NCT01285635 [ 366 ]
NSCLCAT-101 plus DocetaxelPhase IIOf the 53 patients analyzed, 2 showed partial response, and 22 showed stable disease. No complete responses were observed. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (9.4%), dyspnea (5.7%), and anemia (5.7%).NCT00544960 [ 367 ]
Advanced NSCLC with high expression of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1AT-101 combined with Docetaxel and CisplatinPhase IIOf the 31 patients analyzed, 3 showed partial response, and 23 showed stable disease. No complete responses were observed. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs was anemia (3.2%).NCT01977209 [ 368 ]
Laryngeal cancerAT-101 in combination with Docetaxel and Cisplatin or CarboplatinPhase IIOf the 36 patients analyzed, 19 showed partial response. No complete responses were observed. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (9%), diarrhea (7%), and nausea (7%).NCT01633541 [ 369 ]
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerAT-101 plus Docetaxel and Prednisone Vs Docetaxel with PrednisonePhase II110 patients were analyzed. The median OS was 18.1 months. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (47.3%), leukopenia (24.5%), and lymphopenia (22.7%).NCT00286793 NCT00571675 [ 370 ]
PelcitoclaxSCLC or advanced solid tumorsPelcitoclaxPhase ITerminated with no published resultsNCT03387332
Locally advanced or metastatic solid tumorsPelcitoclaxPhase IThe treatment was well tolerated with transaminase elevations and thrombocytopenia as most common AEs. The ORR and DCR were 6.5% and 30.4%, respectively.NCT03080311 [ 371 ]
Advanced neuroendocrine tumorPelcitoclaxPhase IbTerminated with no published resultsNCT04893759
Myelofibrosis that progressed after initial therapyPelcitoclaxPhase Ib/IIWithdrawn by sponsor decisionNCT04354727
Recurrent ovarian and endometrial cancersPelcitoclax and CobimetinibPhase ICurrently recruitingNCT05691504
EGFR TKI resistant NSCLCPelcitoclax and OsimertinibPhase IbActive, not recruitingNCT04001777
Relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomaPelcitoclax or Pelcitoclax plus ChidamidePhase Ib/IICurrently recruitingNCT05186012
Relapsed/refractory SCLCPelcitoclax and PaclitaxelPhase Ib/IITerminated with no published resultsNCT04210037
AZD0466Advanced hematologic or solid tumorsAZD0466Phase ITerminated with no published resultsNCT04214093
Advanced hematological malignanciesAZD0466 alone or combined with VoriconazolePhase I/IITerminated based on benefit-risk profile assessmentNCT04865419
Advanced non-Hodgkin lymphomaAZD0466 alone or combined with anticancer agentsPhase I/IITerminated due to safety reasonsNCT05205161
LP-118Advanced malignanciesLP-118Phase IActive, not recruitingNCT05025358
Relapsed or refractory hematological malignanciesLP-118Phase I/IbRecruitingNCT04771572
Relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphomaLP-118, Ponatinib, Vincristine and DexamethasonePhase I/IIRecruitingNCT06207123

7. Conclusions

BCL-2 and BCL-xL play a central role in apoptosis regulation, but their functions extend far beyond preventing cell death. They contribute to tumor progression, invasiveness, angiogenesis, chemotherapy resistance, and cellular metabolism, highlighting their multifaceted role in cancer biology. Although selective inhibitors, such as BH3 mimetics, show promise, challenges remain regarding efficacy and toxicity. Future research should continue to focus on developing combination therapies that target BCL-2 and BCL-xL alongside other oncogenic pathways, exploring context-specific inhibitors that minimize off-target effects, and identifying biomarkers to predict patient response. Additionally, deeper investigation into their non-apoptotic roles, including regulation of metabolism and mitochondrial dynamics, could uncover novel therapeutic opportunities and improve precision oncology approaches.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.B., P.M.A.S. and J.P.N.S.; data collection, J.P.N.S., B.P. and P.M.A.S.; resources, H.B. and P.M.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P.N.S., B.P. and P.M.A.S.; writing—review and editing, B.P., P.M.A.S. and H.B.; supervision, H.B. and P.M.A.S.; funding acquisition and management, H.B. and P.M.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: 5-FU 5-fluorouracil A1/BFL-1 BCL-2-related gene A1 AEs Adverse events AKT Ak strain transforming AML Acute Myeloid Leukemia APAF Apoptotic Protease Activating Factor ASF Alternative splicing factor ATP Adenosine Triphosphate BAD BCL-2-associated death promoter BAK BCL-2 homologous antagonist/killer BAX BCL-2-associated X protein BCL B-cell lymphoma BET Bromodomain and extra-terminal BFK BCL-2 family kin BH BCL-2 Homology BID BH3-interacting domain death agonist BIK BCL-2-interacting killer BIM BCL-2-interacting mediator of cell death BMF BCL-2-modifying factor BMPR2 Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Type 2 BOK BCL-2-related ovarian killer BRAF B-Raf proto-oncogene Ca 2+ Divalent calcium ion CBP CREB binding protein CDK Cyclin-dependent kinase CeRNA Competing Endogenous RNA c-Jun Cellular Jun CK1ε Casein kinase 1ε CLL Chronic lymphocytic leukemia CML Chronic myeloid leukemia c-Myc Cellular Myelocytomatosis oncogene COX Cyclooxygenase CPTAC Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium CRC Colorectal cancer CRE cAMP Response Element CREB cAMP Response Element-Binding protein CXCR4 C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 DCR Disease control rate DISC Death-inducing signaling complex DLBCL Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid Drp1 Dynamin-related protein 1 DUSP4 Dual specificity phosphatase 4 EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor ER Endoplasmic reticulum ERK Extracellular signal-Regulated Kinase FADD Fas-associated protein with death domain GABARAP GABA type A Receptor–Associated Protein GRIM19 Gene associated with Retinoid-IFN-induced Mortality 19 GTP Guanosine Triphosphate HCC Hepatocellular carcinoma HIF Hypoxia-Inducible Factor hnRNPs Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins HNSCC Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma HRK Harakiri HSP Heat Shock Protein IDR Intrinsically disordered region IFN Interferon IL Interleukin IP3R Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor JNK c-Jun N-terminal kinase LATS Large tumor suppressor kinases lncRNA Long non-coding RNA Lys Lysine MAPK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase MCL-1 Myeloid cell leukemia 1 MEK Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase METTL14 Methyltransferase-like 14 miRNA Micro Ribonucleic Acid MITF Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor MMP matrix metalloproteinase MOMP Mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization mRNA Messenger Ribonucleic Acid MST Mammalian Sterile 20-like kinase MTD Maximum tolerated dose MYC Myelocytomatosis oncogene NEK2 NIMA (Never In Mitosis Gene A)-related kinase 2 NF-κB Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells NFYA Nuclear transcription factor Y α NSCLC Non-small cell lung cancer OS Overall survival OSCC Oral squamous cell carcinoma PAR2 Protease-activated receptor 2 PARP Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase PDTX Patient-Derived Tumor Xenograft PGAM5 Phosphoglycerate Mutase Family Member 5 PI3K Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase PINK1 PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 PKCα Protein kinase Cα PLK Polo-like kinase PP2A Protein Phosphatase 2A PTBP1 Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein 1 PTEN Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog PUMA p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis RAS Rat sarcoma RASSF Ras association domain family RBM RNA binding motif protein ROS Reactive oxygen species RNAPII RNA polymerase II RNF RING finger RNPS1 RNA-binding protein with SR domain 1 SAC Spindle assembly checkpoint SAM68 SRC associated with mitosis, of 68 kDa SAPK Stress-Activated Protein Kinase SCC Squamous cell carcinoma SCLC Small cell lung cancer Ser Serine SF3B1 Splicing factor 3b subunit 1 SOX9 SRY-box transcription factor 9 Sp1 Specificity Protein 1 SRPK Serine/arginine protein kinase SRSF Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor STAT Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription TCGA The Cancer Genome Atlas TGF Transforming Growth Factor Thr Threonine TNBC Triple-Negative Breast Cancer TNF-R Tumor necrosis factor receptor TRA2β Transformer 2β TRAIL-R1/2 TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1/2 UALCAN University of ALabama at Birmingham CANcer data analysis Portal Ub Ubiquitination VDAC1 Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 1 VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor VPS Vacuolar Protein Sorting uPA Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator uPAR Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor YAP Yes-associated protein

References

1. Voss A.K. Strasser A. The Essentials of Developmental Apoptosis F1000Research 2020 9 148 10.12688/f1000research.21571.1 PMC7047912 32148779

2. Renault T.T. Dejean L.M. Manon S. A Brewing Understanding of the Regulation of Bax Function by Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 Mech. Ageing Dev. 2017 161 201 210 10.1016/j.mad.2016.04.007 27112371

3. Green D.R. Llambi F. Cell Death Signaling Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015 7 a006080 10.1101/cshperspect.a006080 26626938 PMC4665079

4. Yanumula A. Cusick J.K. Biochemistry, Extrinsic Pathway of Apoptosis StatPearls Publishing Treasure Island, FL, USA 2024 32809646

5. Lee E.F. Fairlie W.D. The Structural Biology of Bcl-XL Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 2234 10.3390/ijms20092234 31067648 PMC6540150

6. Osterlund E.J. Hirmiz N. Nguyen D. Pemberton J.M. Fang Q. Andrews D.W. Endoplasmic Reticulum Protein BIK Binds to and Inhibits Mitochondria-Localized Antiapoptotic Proteins J. Biol. Chem. 2023 299 102863 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102863 36603764 PMC9932132

7. Bas J. Nguyen T. Gillet G. Involvement of Bcl-XL in Neuronal Function and Development Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 22 3202 10.3390/ijms22063202 33801158 PMC8004157

8. Lossi L. The Concept of Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Apoptosis Biochem. J. 2022 479 357 384 10.1042/BCJ20210854 35147165

9. Kwon J.-W. Oh J.-S. Seok S.H. An H.-W. Lee Y.J. Lee N.Y. Ha T. Kim H.A. Yoon G.M. Kim S.E. Combined Inhibition of Bcl-2 Family Members and YAP Induces Synthetic Lethality in Metastatic Gastric Cancer with RASA1 and NF2 Deficiency Mol. Cancer 2023 22 156 10.1186/s12943-023-01857-0 37730636 PMC10510129

10. Farmer T. O’Neill K.L. Naslavsky N. Luo X. Caplan S. Retromer Facilitates the Localization of Bcl-XL to the Mitochondrial Outer Membrane Mol. Biol. Cell 2019 30 1138 1146 10.1091/mbc.E19-01-0044 30840537 PMC6724524

11. Chen Y. Aon M.A. Hsu Y.-T. Soane L. Teng X. McCaffery J.M. Cheng W.-C. Qi B. Li H. Alavian K.N. Bcl-XL Regulates Mitochondrial Energetics by Stabilizing the Inner Membrane Potential J. Cell Biol. 2011 195 263 276 10.1083/jcb.201108059 21987637 PMC3198165

12. Alavian K.N. Li H. Collis L. Bonanni L. Zeng L. Sacchetti S. Lazrove E. Nabili P. Flaherty B. Graham M. Bcl-XL Regulates Metabolic Efficiency of Neurons through Interaction with the Mitochondrial F1FO ATP Synthase Nat. Cell Biol. 2011 13 1224 1233 Erratum in Nat. Cell Biol. 2011 , 13 , 1383. 10.1038/ncb2330 21926988 PMC3186867

13. Pinton P. Giorgi C. Siviero R. Zecchini E. Rizzuto R. Calcium and Apoptosis: ER-Mitochondria Ca2+ Transfer in the Control of Apoptosis Oncogene 2008 27 6407 6418 10.1038/onc.2008.308 18955969 PMC2844952

14. Montero J. Letai A. Why Do BCL-2 Inhibitors Work and Where Should We Use Them in the Clinic? Cell Death Differ. 2018 25 56 64 10.1038/cdd.2017.183 29077093 PMC5729538

15. Green D.R. A Matter of Life and Death Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2022 14 a041004 10.1101/cshperspect.a041004 34983779 PMC8725630

16. Chong S.J.F. Lu J. Valentin R. Lehmberg T.Z. Eu J.Q. Wang J. Zhu F. Kong L.R. Fernandes S.M. Zhang J. BCL-2 Dependence Is a Favorable Predictive Marker of Response to Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Mol. Cancer 2025 24 62 10.1186/s12943-025-02260-7 40025512 PMC11874845

17. Kump K.J. Ahmad E. Foucar C. Avelar R.A. Murga-Zamalloa C. Lieberman M. Kandarpa M. Mady A.S.A. DiFeo A. Zhang L. Understanding the Functional Dependence and Inhibition of the Bcl-2 Pro-Survival Proteins in a Wide Spectrum of Cancers toward Precision Medicine ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2025 8 2922 2935 10.1021/acsptsci.5c00088 40969874 PMC12441837

18. Basu A. The Interplay between Apoptosis and Cellular Senescence: Bcl-2 Family Proteins as Targets for Cancer Therapy Pharmacol. Ther. 2022 230 107943 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107943 34182005

19. Singh R. Letai A. Sarosiek K. Regulation of Apoptosis in Health and Disease: The Balancing Act of BCL-2 Family Proteins Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019 20 175 193 10.1038/s41580-018-0089-8 30655609 PMC7325303

20. Chrysovergis A. Papanikolaou V.S. Tsiambas E. Ragos V. Peschos D. Kyrodimos E. Digital Analysis of BCL2 Expression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Anticancer Res. 2019 39 1253 1257 10.21873/anticanres.13235 30842155

21. Warren C.F.A. Wong-Brown M.W. Bowden N.A. BCL-2 Family Isoforms in Apoptosis and Cancer Cell Death Dis. 2019 10 177 10.1038/s41419-019-1407-6 30792387 PMC6384907

22. Kaloni D. Diepstraten S.T. Strasser A. Kelly G.L. BCL-2 Protein Family: Attractive Targets for Cancer Therapy Apoptosis 2023 28 20 38 10.1007/s10495-022-01780-7 36342579 PMC9950219

23. Li Z.-L. Ueki K. Kumagai K. Araki R. Otsuki Y. Regulation of Bcl-2 Transcription by Estrogen Receptor-α and c-Jun in Human Endometrium Med. Mol. Morphol. 2014 47 43 53 10.1007/s00795-013-0043-y 23665993

24. Chen N. Hu T. Gui Y. Gao J. Li Z. Huang S. Transcriptional Regulation of Bcl-2 Gene by the PR/SET Domain Family Member PRDM10 PeerJ 2019 7 e6941 10.7717/peerj.6941 31143550 PMC6525587

25. Kyrönlahti A. Raämö M. Tamminen M. Unkila-Kallio L. Butzow R. Leminen A. Nemer M. Rahman N. Huhtaniemi I. Heikinheimo M. GATA-4 Regulates Bcl-2 Expression in Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors Endocrinology 2008 149 5635 5642 10.1210/en.2008-0148 18653721

26. Suzuki Y.J. Cell Signaling Pathways for the Regulation of GATA4 Transcription Factor: Implications for Cell Growth and Apoptosis Cell. Signal. 2011 23 1094 1099 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.02.007 21376121 PMC3078531

27. Catz S.D. Johnson J.L. Transcriptional Regulation of Bcl-2 by Nuclear Factor ΚB and Its Significance in Prostate Cancer Oncogene 2001 20 7342 7351 10.1038/sj.onc.1204926 11704864

28. Wilson B.E. Mochon E. Boxer L.M. Induction of Bcl -2 Expression by Phosphorylated CREB Proteins during B-Cell Activation and Rescue from Apoptosis Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996 16 5546 5556 10.1128/MCB.16.10.5546 8816467 PMC231554

29. Tanaka T. Kikuchi N. Goto K. Iino M. Sec6/8 Regulates Bcl-2 and Mcl-1, but Not Bcl-Xl, in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Cells Apoptosis 2016 21 594 608 10.1007/s10495-016-1230-9 26892009

30. Tomasi M.L. Ryoo M. Ramani K. Tomasi I. Giordano P. Mato J.M. Lu S.C. Methionine Adenosyltransferase A2 Sumoylation Positively Regulate Bcl-2 Expression in Human Colon and Liver Cancer Cells Oncotarget 2015 6 37706 37723 10.18632/oncotarget.5342 26416353 PMC4741959

31. Patel J.H. McMahon S.B. BCL2 Is a Downstream Effector of MIZ-1 Essential for Blocking c-MYC-Induced Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem. 2007 282 5 13 10.1074/jbc.M609138200 17082179

32. Filippova N. Yang X. Wang Y. Gillespie G.Y. Langford C. King P.H. Wheeler C. Nabors L.B. The RNA-Binding Protein HuR Promotes Glioma Growth and Treatment Resistance Mol. Cancer Res. 2011 9 648 659 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0325 21498545 PMC3096748

33. Sengupta T.K. Bandyopadhyay S. Fernandes D.J. Spicer E.K. Identification of Nucleolin as an AU-Rich Element Binding Protein Involved in Bcl-2 MRNA Stabilization J. Biol. Chem. 2004 279 10855 10863 10.1074/jbc.M309111200 14679209

34. Lapucci A. Lulli M. Amedei A. Papucci L. Witort E. Di Gesualdo F. Bertolini F. Brewer G. Nicolin A. Bevilacqua A. Ζ-Crystallin Is a Bcl-2 MRNA Binding Protein Involved in Bcl-2 Overexpression in T-cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia FASEB J. 2010 24 1852 1865 10.1096/fj.09-140459 20103721 PMC2874474

35. Kuwano Y. Nishida K. Kajita K. Satake Y. Akaike Y. Fujita K. Kano S. Masuda K. Rokutan K. Transformer 2β and MiR-204 Regulate Apoptosis through Competitive Binding to 3′ UTR of BCL2 MRNA Cell Death Differ. 2015 22 815 825 10.1038/cdd.2014.176 25342468 PMC4392078

36. Hopkins T.G. Mura M. Al-Ashtal H.A. Lahr R.M. Abd-Latip N. Sweeney K. Lu H. Weir J. El-Bahrawy M. Steel J.H. The RNA-Binding Protein LARP1 Is a Post-Transcriptional Regulator of Survival and Tumorigenesis in Ovarian Cancer Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 44 1227 1246 10.1093/nar/gkv1515 26717985 PMC4756840

37. Lapucci A. Donnini M. Papucci L. Witort E. Tempestini A. Bevilacqua A. Nicolin A. Brewer G. Schiavone N. Capaccioli S. AUF1 Is a Bcl-2 A + U-Rich Element-Binding Protein Involved in Bcl-2 MRNA Destabilization during Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem. 2002 277 16139 16146 10.1074/jbc.M201377200 11856759

38. Zekavati A. Nasir A. Alcaraz A. Aldrovandi M. Marsh P. Norton J.D. Murphy J.J. Post-Transcriptional Regulation of BCL2 MRNA by the RNA-Binding Protein ZFP36L1 in Malignant B Cells PLoS ONE 2014 9 e102625 10.1371/journal.pone.0102625 25014217 PMC4094554

39. Cui J. Placzek W. Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Anti-Apoptotic BCL2 Family Members Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 19 308 10.3390/ijms19010308 29361709 PMC5796252

40. Zhang X. Pan Y. Fu H. Zhang J. MicroRNA-205 and MicroRNA-338-3p Reduces Cell Apoptosis in Prostate Carcinoma Tissue and LNCaP Prostate Carcinoma Cells by Directly Targeting the B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) Gene Med. Sci. Monit. 2019 25 1122 1132 10.12659/MSM.912148 30741252 PMC6380162

41. Guo Q. Zhang Q. Lu L. Xu Y. Long Noncoding RNA RUSC1-AS1 Promotes Tumorigenesis in Cervical Cancer by Acting as a Competing Endogenous RNA of MicroRNA-744 and Consequently Increasing Bcl-2 Expression Cell Cycle 2020 19 1222 1235 10.1080/15384101.2020.1749468 32264732 PMC7217379

42. Zhuang D. Liang L. Zhang H. Feng X. MiR-202 Suppresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression via Downregulating BCL2 Expression Oncol. Res. Featur. Preclin. Clin. Cancer Ther. 2020 28 399 408 10.3727/096504020X15864296270581 PMC7851524 32272979

43. Zhao Y. Wang X. MiR-34a Targets BCL-2 to Suppress the Migration and Invasion of Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Oncol. Lett. 2018 16 6566 6572 10.3892/ol.2018.9427 30405796 PMC6202510

44. Liao Z. Tan X. Dong K. Zhang H. Chen X. Chu L. Zhang B. MiRNA-448 Inhibits Cell Growth by Targeting BCL-2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Dig. Liver Dis. 2019 51 703 711 10.1016/j.dld.2018.09.021 30316787

45. Ye B. Qiao K. Zhao Q. Jiang Z. Hu N. Wang F. Tanshinone I Restrains Osteosarcoma Progression by Regulating Circ_0000376/MiR-432-5p/BCL2 Axis Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2022 477 1 13 10.1007/s11010-021-04257-4 34532813

46. Cao X. Fan Q.-L. LncRNA MIR503HG Promotes High-Glucose-Induced Proximal Tubular Cell Apoptosis by Targeting MiR-503-5p/Bcl-2 Pathway Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. Targets Ther. 2020 13 4507 4517 10.2147/DMSO.S277869 PMC7691658 33262626

47. Sims E.K. Lakhter A.J. Anderson-Baucum E. Kono T. Tong X. Evans-Molina C. MicroRNA 21 Targets BCL2 MRNA to Increase Apoptosis in Rat and Human Beta Cells Diabetologia 2017 60 1057 1065 10.1007/s00125-017-4237-z 28280903 PMC5425307

48. Zhao L. Islam R. Wang Y. Zhang X. Liu L.-Z. Epigenetic Regulation in Chromium-, Nickel- and Cadmium-Induced Carcinogenesis Cancers 2022 14 5768 10.3390/cancers14235768 36497250 PMC9737485

49. Cui H. Han W. Hou L. Yang L. Li X. Su X. MiR-1915-3p Inhibits Bcl-2 Expression in the Development of Gastric Cancer Biosci. Rep. 2019 39 BSR20182321 10.1042/BSR20182321 31036603 PMC6522727

50. Tao S. Gu J. Wang Q. Zheng L. Translational Control of Bcl-2 Promotes Apoptosis of Gastric Carcinoma Cells BMC Cancer 2021 21 12 10.1186/s12885-020-07711-6 33402109 PMC7786514

51. Ma X. Wu D. Zhang X. Shao X. Hu G. MicroRNA-214 Prevents Traits of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma via VEGFA and Bcl-2 Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2020 19 1533033820980098 10.1177/1533033820980098 33280526 PMC7724270

52. Raonić J. Ždralević M. Vučković L. Šunjević M. Todorović V. Vukmirović F. Marzano F. Tullo A. Giannattasio S. Radunović M. MiR-29a Expression Negatively Correlates with Bcl-2 Levels in Colorectal Cancer and Is Correlated with Better Prognosis Pathol.-Res. Pract. 2024 262 155491 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155491 39126835

53. Hu C. Wang S. Liu L. Long Non-Coding RNA Small Nucleolar RNA Host Gene 1 Alleviates the Progression of Epilepsy by Regulating the MiR-181a/BCL-2 Axis in Vitro Life Sci. 2021 267 118935 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118935 33359246

54. Davari N. Ahmadpour F. Kiani A.A. Azadpour M. Asadi Z.T. Evaluation of MicroRNA-223 and MicroRNA-125a Expression Association with STAT3 and Bcl2 Genes in Blood Leukocytes of CLL Patients: A Case–Control Study BMC Res. Notes 2021 14 21 10.1186/s13104-020-05428-0 33430952 PMC8095339

55. Morales-Martínez M. Vega M.I. Roles and Regulation of BCL-XL in Hematological Malignancies Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022 23 2193 10.3390/ijms23042193 35216310 PMC8876520

56. Borrás C. Mas-Bargues C. Román-Domínguez A. Sanz-Ros J. Gimeno-Mallench L. Inglés M. Gambini J. Viña J. BCL-XL, a Mitochondrial Protein Involved in Successful Aging: From C. Elegans to Human Centenarians Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 418 10.3390/ijms21020418 31936510 PMC7014191

57. Chen N. Chen X. Huang R. Zeng H. Gong J. Meng W. Lu Y. Zhao F. Wang L. Zhou Q. BCL-XL Is a Target Gene Regulated by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α J. Biol. Chem. 2009 284 10004 10012 10.1074/jbc.M805997200 19211554 PMC2665055

58. Arellano N.S. Heaton W.L. Nauman M.C. Runnels A.E. Gomez-Villa J. Vanni D. Gaviria M. Fujita M. Krah N.M. Ciboddo M. Type 2 Calreticulin Mutations Activate ATF6 to Promote BCL-XL–Mediated Survival in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Blood 2025 146 971 983 10.1182/blood.2024026940 40403318

59. Haselager M. Thijssen R. West C. Young L. Van Kampen R. Willmore E. Mackay S. Kater A. Eldering E. Regulation of Bcl-XL by Non-Canonical NF-ΚB in the Context of CD40-Induced Drug Resistance in CLL Cell Death Differ. 2021 28 1658 1668 10.1038/s41418-020-00692-w 33495554 PMC8167103

60. Lucianò A.M. Pérez-Oliva A.B. Mulero V. Del Bufalo D. Bcl-XL: A Focus on Melanoma Pathobiology Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 22 2777 10.3390/ijms22052777 33803452 PMC7967179

61. Bielli P. Busà R. Di Stasi S.M. Munoz M.J. Botti F. Kornblihtt A.R. Sette C. The Transcription Factor FBI-1 Inhibits SAM68-mediated BCL-X Alternative Splicing and Apoptosis EMBO Rep. 2014 15 419 427 10.1002/embr.201338241 24514149 PMC3989673

62. Sun Q. Tang Y. Wang L. Liu B. Xiao J. Wang H. Lei S. Chen Y. Liu Y. Liu S. CK1ε/SRSF10 Axis Regulates the Alternative Splicing of Bcl-x in Lung Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem. 2025 301 110508 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110508 40701249 PMC12391806

63. Stevens M. Oltean S. Modulation of the Apoptosis Gene Bcl-x Function Through Alternative Splicing Front. Genet. 2019 10 804 10.3389/fgene.2019.00804 31552099 PMC6743414

64. Weldon C. Dacanay J.G. Gokhale V. Boddupally P.V.L. Behm-Ansmant I. Burley G.A. Branlant C. Hurley L.H. Dominguez C. Eperon I.C. Specific G-Quadruplex Ligands Modulate the Alternative Splicing of Bcl-X Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 46 886 896 10.1093/nar/gkx1122 29156002 PMC5778605

65. Revil T. Toutant J. Shkreta L. Garneau D. Cloutier P. Chabot B. Protein Kinase C-Dependent Control of Bcl-x Alternative Splicing Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007 27 8431 8441 10.1128/MCB.00565-07 17923691 PMC2169420

66. Bielli P. Bordi M. Di Biasio V. Sette C. Regulation of BCL-X Splicing Reveals a Role for the Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein (PTBP1/HnRNP I) in Alternative 5′ Splice Site Selection Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 42 12070 12081 10.1093/nar/gku922 25294838 PMC4231771

67. Inoue A. Yamamoto N. Kimura M. Nishio K. Yamane H. Nakajima K. RBM10 Regulates Alternative Splicing FEBS Lett. 2014 588 942 947 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.052 24530524

68. Garneau D. Revil T. Fisette J.-F. Chabot B. Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein F/H Proteins Modulate the Alternative Splicing of the Apoptotic Mediator Bcl-X J. Biol. Chem. 2005 280 22641 22650 10.1074/jbc.M501070200 15837790

69. Zhang S. Zhong J. Xu L. Wu Y. Xu J. Shi J. Gu Z. Li X. Jin N. Truncated Dyrk1AAggravates Neuronal Apoptosis by Inhibiting ASF-mediated Bcl-x Exon 2b Inclusion CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2024 30 e14493 10.1111/cns.14493 37864462 PMC11017436

70. Pedrotti S. Busà R. Compagnucci C. Sette C. The RNA Recognition Motif Protein RBM11 Is a Novel Tissue-Specific Splicing Regulator Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 40 1021 1032 10.1093/nar/gkr819 21984414 PMC3273811

71. Fuentes-Fayos A.C. Pérez-Gómez J.M. G-García M.E. Jiménez-Vacas J.M. Blanco-Acevedo C. Sánchez-Sánchez R. Solivera J. Breunig J.J. Gahete M.D. Castaño J.P. SF3B1 Inhibition Disrupts Malignancy and Prolongs Survival in Glioblastoma Patients through BCL2L1 Splicing and MTOR/ß-Catenin Pathways Imbalances J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022 41 39 10.1186/s13046-022-02241-4 35086552 PMC8793262

72. Michelle L. Cloutier A. Toutant J. Shkreta L. Thibault P. Durand M. Garneau D. Gendron D. Lapointe E. Couture S. Proteins Associated with the Exon Junction Complex Also Control the Alternative Splicing of Apoptotic Regulators Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012 32 954 967 10.1128/MCB.06130-11 22203037 PMC3295189

73. Montes M. Cloutier A. Sánchez-Hernández N. Michelle L. Lemieux B. Blanchette M. Hernández-Munain C. Chabot B. Suñé C. TCERG1 Regulates Alternative Splicing of the Bcl-x Gene by Modulating the Rate of RNA Polymerase II Transcription Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012 32 751 762 10.1128/MCB.06255-11 22158966 PMC3272968

74. Zhang Y. Deng Z. Sun S. Xie S. Jiang M. Chen B. Gu C. Yang Y. NAT10 Acetylates BCL-XL MRNA to Promote the Proliferation of Multiple Myeloma Cells through PI3K-AKT Pathway Front. Oncol. 2022 12 967811 10.3389/fonc.2022.967811 35978804 PMC9376478

75. Aakko S. Straume A.H. Birkeland E.E. Chen P. Qiao X. ’Lønning P.E. Kallio M.J. MYC-Induced MiR-203b-3p and MiR-203a-3p Control Bcl-XL Expression and Paclitaxel Sensitivity in Tumor Cells Transl. Oncol. 2019 12 170 179 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.10.001 30359947 PMC6199766

76. Shimizu S. Takehara T. Hikita H. Kodama T. Miyagi T. Hosui A. Tatsumi T. Ishida H. Noda T. Nagano H. The Let-7 Family of MicroRNAs Inhibits Bcl-XL Expression and Potentiates Sorafenib-Induced Apoptosis in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma J. Hepatol. 2010 52 698 704 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.12.024 20347499

77. Veys C. Boulouard F. Benmoussa A. Jammes M. Brotin E. Rédini F. Poulain L. Gruchy N. Denoyelle C. Legendre F. MiR-4270 Acts as a Tumor Suppressor by Directly Targeting Bcl-XL in Human Osteosarcoma Cells Front. Oncol. 2023 13 1220459 10.3389/fonc.2023.1220459 37719019 PMC10501397

78. Zhu R. Zhou H. Chen W. Bai S. Liu F. Wang X. BCL2L1 Is Regulated by the LncRNA MIR4435-2HG-MiR-513a-5p-BCL2L1 CeRNA Axis and Serves as a Biomarker for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treatment and Prognosis Gene 2024 925 148615 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148615 38788819

79. Kelekar A. Thompson C.B. Bcl-2-Family Proteins: The Role of the BH3 Domain in Apoptosis Trends Cell Biol. 1998 8 324 330 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01321-X 9704409

80. Gabellini C. Trisciuoglio D. Del Bufalo D. Non-Canonical Roles of Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL Proteins: Relevance of BH4 Domain Carcinogenesis 2017 38 579 587 10.1093/carcin/bgx016 28203756

81. Hirotani M. Zhang Y. Fujita N. Naito M. Tsuruo T. NH2-Terminal BH4 Domain of Bcl-2 Is Functional for Heterodimerization with Bax and Inhibition of Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem. 1999 274 20415 20420 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20415 10400666

82. Ke D. Yu Y. Li C. Han J. Xu J. Phosphorylation of BCL2 at the Ser70 Site Mediates RANKL-Induced Osteoclast Precursor Autophagy and Osteoclastogenesis Mol. Med. 2022 28 22 10.1186/s10020-022-00449-w 35183115 PMC8858497

83. Wang H.-G. Rapp U.R. Reed J.C. Bcl-2 Targets the Protein Kinase Raf-1 to Mitochondria Cell 1996 87 629 638 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81383-5 8929532

84. Nolan A.A. Aboud N.K. Kolch W. Matallanas D. Hidden Targets in RAF Signalling Pathways to Block Oncogenic RAS Signalling Genes 2021 12 553 10.3390/genes12040553 33920182 PMC8070103

85. Ito T. Deng X. Carr B. May W.S. Bcl-2 Phosphorylation Required for Anti-Apoptosis Function J. Biol. Chem. 1997 272 11671 11673 10.1074/jbc.272.18.11671 9115213

86. Low I.C.C. Loh T. Huang Y. Virshup D.M. Pervaiz S. Ser70 Phosphorylation of Bcl-2 by Selective Tyrosine Nitration of PP2A-B56δ Stabilizes Its Antiapoptotic Activity Blood 2014 124 2223 2234 10.1182/blood-2014-03-563296 25082878

87. Zhou M. Zhang Q. Zhao J. Liao M. Wen S. Yang M. Phosphorylation of Bcl-2 Plays an Important Role in Glycochenodeoxycholate-Induced Survival and Chemoresistance in HCC Oncol. Rep. 2017 38 1742 1750 10.3892/or.2017.5830 28731137

88. Joniova J. Misuth M. Sureau F. Miskovsky P. Nadova Z. Effect of PKCα Expression on Bcl-2 Phosphorylation and Cell Death by Hypericin Apoptosis 2014 19 1779 1792 10.1007/s10495-014-1043-7 25300800

89. De Chiara G. Marcocci M.E. Torcia M. Lucibello M. Rosini P. Bonini P. Higashimoto Y. Damonte G. Armirotti A. Amodei S. Bcl-2 Phosphorylation by P38 MAPK J. Biol. Chem. 2006 281 21353 21361 10.1074/jbc.M511052200 16714293

90. Breitschopf K. Haendeler J. Malchow P. Zeiher A.M. Dimmeler S. Posttranslational Modification of Bcl-2 Facilitates Its Proteasome-Dependent Degradation: Molecular Characterization of the Involved Signaling Pathway Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000 20 1886 1896 10.1128/MCB.20.5.1886-1896.2000 10669763 PMC85374

91. Furukawa Y. Iwase S. Kikuchi J. Terui Y. Nakamura M. Yamada H. Kano Y. Matsuda M. Phosphorylation of Bcl-2 Protein by CDC2 Kinase during G 2 /M Phases and Its Role in Cell Cycle Regulation J. Biol. Chem. 2000 275 21661 21667 10.1074/jbc.M906893199 10766756

92. Dai H. Ding H. Meng X.W. Lee S.-H. Schneider P.A. Kaufmann S.H. Contribution of Bcl-2 Phosphorylation to Bak Binding and Drug Resistance Cancer Res. 2013 73 6998 7008 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0940 24097825 PMC3910374

93. Megyesi J. Tarcsafalvi A. Seng N. Hodeify R. Price P. Cdk2 Phosphorylation of Bcl-XL after Stress Converts It to a pro-Apoptotic Protein Mimicking Bax/Bak Cell Death Discov. 2016 2 15066 10.1038/cddiscovery.2015.66 27226901 PMC4877050

94. Follis A.V. Llambi F. Kalkavan H. Yao Y. Phillips A.H. Park C.-G. Marassi F.M. Green D.R. Kriwacki R.W. Regulation of Apoptosis by an Intrinsically Disordered Region of Bcl-XL Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018 14 458 465 10.1038/s41589-018-0011-x 29507390 PMC5899648

95. Dho S.H. Deverman B.E. Lapid C. Manson S.R. Gan L. Riehm J.J. Aurora R. Kwon K.-S. Weintraub S.J. Control of Cellular Bcl-XL Levels by Deamidation-Regulated Degradation PLoS Biol. 2013 11 e1001588 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001588 23823868 PMC3692414

96. Dho S.H. Manson S.R. Jung S.H. Lim J.C. Weintraub S.J. Bcl-XL Deamidation Is Regulated by Multiple Ion Transporters and Is Intramolecularly Catalyzed Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2018 1865 995 1001 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.04.009 29694915

97. Follis A.V. Chipuk J.E. Fisher J.C. Yun M.-K. Grace C.R. Nourse A. Baran K. Ou L. Min L. White S.W. PUMA Binding Induces Partial Unfolding within BCL-XL to Disrupt P53 Binding and Promote Apoptosis Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013 9 163 168 10.1038/nchembio.1166 23340338 PMC3683295

98. Zheng J.H. Viacava Follis A. Kriwacki R.W. Moldoveanu T. Discoveries and Controversies in BCL-2 Protein-mediated Apoptosis FEBS J. 2016 283 2690 2700 10.1111/febs.13527 26411300

99. Du M. Yu S. Su W. Zhao M. Yang F. Liu Y. Mai Z. Wang Y. Wang X. Chen T. Mitofusin 2 but Not Mitofusin 1 Mediates Bcl-XL-Induced Mitochondrial Aggregation J. Cell Sci. 2020 133 jcs245001 10.1242/jcs.245001 32958707

100. Rosa N. Speelman-Rooms F. Parys J.B. Bultynck G. Modulation of Ca 2+ Signaling by Antiapoptotic Bcl-2 versus Bcl-XL: From Molecular Mechanisms to Relevance for Cancer Cell Survival Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Rev. Cancer 2022 1877 188791 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188791 36162541

101. Peña-Blanco A. García-Sáez A.J. Bax, Bak and beyond—Mitochondrial Performance in Apoptosis FEBS J. 2018 285 416 431 10.1111/febs.14186 28755482

102. Lee E.F. Grabow S. Chappaz S. Dewson G. Hockings C. Kluck R.M. Debrincat M.A. Gray D.H. Witkowski M.T. Evangelista M. Physiological Restraint of Bak by Bcl-x L Is Essential for Cell Survival Genes Dev. 2016 30 1240 1250 10.1101/gad.279414.116 27198225 PMC4888843

103. Bleicken S. Hantusch A. Das K.K. Frickey T. Garcia-Saez A.J. Quantitative Interactome of a Membrane Bcl-2 Network Identifies a Hierarchy of Complexes for Apoptosis Regulation Nat. Commun. 2017 8 73 10.1038/s41467-017-00086-6 28706229 PMC5509671

104. Puja R. Dutta S. Bose K. Elucidating the Interaction of C-Terminal Domain of Vaccinia-Related Kinase 2A (VRK2A) with B-Cell Lymphoma-Extra Large (Bcl-XL) to Decipher Its Anti-Apoptotic Role in Cancer Biochem. J. 2023 480 1871 1885 10.1042/BCJ20230349 37943248

105. Bogner C. Kale J. Pogmore J. Chi X. Shamas-Din A. Fradin C. Leber B. Andrews D.W. Allosteric Regulation of BH3 Proteins in Bcl-XL Complexes Enables Switch-like Activation of Bax Mol. Cell 2020 77 901 912.e9 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.025 32001105

106. Murad F. Garcia-Saez A.J. Bcl-XL Inhibits TBid and Bax via Distinct Mechanisms Faraday Discuss. 2021 232 86 102 10.1039/D0FD00045K 34528939

107. Mai Z. Sun H. Yang F. Du M. Cheng X. Chen H. Sun B. Wen J. Wang X. Chen T. Bad Is Essential for Bcl-XL-Enhanced Bax Shuttling between Mitochondria and Cytosol Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2023 155 106359 10.1016/j.biocel.2022.106359 36586532

108. King L.E. Rodriguez-Enriquez R. Pedley R. Mellor C.E.L. Wang P. Zindy E. White M.R.H. Brennan K. Gilmore A.P. Apoptotic Priming Is Defined by the Dynamic Exchange of Bcl-2 Proteins between Mitochondria and Cytosol Cell Death Differ. 2022 29 2262 2274 10.1038/s41418-022-01013-z 35585181 PMC9613888

109. Edlich F. Banerjee S. Suzuki M. Cleland M.M. Arnoult D. Wang C. Neutzner A. Tjandra N. Youle R.J. Bcl-XL Retrotranslocates Bax from the Mitochondria into the Cytosol Cell 2011 145 104 116 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.034 21458670 PMC3070914

110. Todt F. Cakir Z. Reichenbach F. Emschermann F. Lauterwasser J. Kaiser A. Ichim G. Tait S.W. Frank S. Langer H.F. Differential Retrotranslocation of Mitochondrial Bax and Bak EMBO J. 2015 34 67 80 10.15252/embj.201488806 25378477 PMC4291481

111. Vuillier C. Lohard S. Fétiveau A. Allègre J. Kayaci C. King L.E. Braun F. Barillé-Nion S. Gautier F. Dubrez L. E2F1 Interacts with BCL-xL and Regulates Its Subcellular Localization Dynamics to Trigger Cell Death EMBO Rep. 2018 19 234 243 10.15252/embr.201744046 29233828 PMC5797968

112. Denis G.V. Yu Q. Ma P. Deeds L. Faller D.V. Chen C.-Y. Bcl-2, via Its BH4 Domain, Blocks Apoptotic Signaling Mediated by Mitochondrial Ras J. Biol. Chem. 2003 278 5775 5785 10.1074/jbc.M210202200 12477721 PMC11093621

113. Fernández Á.F. Sebti S. Wei Y. Zou Z. Shi M. McMillan K.L. He C. Ting T. Liu Y. Chiang W.-C. Disruption of the Beclin 1–BCL2 Autophagy Regulatory Complex Promotes Longevity in Mice Nature 2018 558 136 140 Correction in Nature 2018 , 561 , E30. 10.1038/s41586-018-0162-7 29849149 PMC5992097

114. Pattingre S. Tassa A. Qu X. Garuti R. Liang X.H. Mizushima N. Packer M. Schneider M.D. Levine B. Bcl-2 Antiapoptotic Proteins Inhibit Beclin 1-Dependent Autophagy Cell 2005 122 927 939 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.002 16179260

115. Tran S. Fairlie W.D. Lee E.F. BECLIN1: Protein Structure, Function and Regulation Cells 2021 10 1522 10.3390/cells10061522 34204202 PMC8235419

116. Yang J. Yao S. JNK-Bcl-2/Bcl-XL-Bax/Bak Pathway Mediates the Crosstalk between Matrine-Induced Autophagy and Apoptosis via Interplay with Beclin 1 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015 16 25744 25758 10.3390/ijms161025744 26516844 PMC4632824

117. Gong Y. Schumacher S.E. Wu W.H. Tang F. Beroukhim R. Chan T.A. Pan-Cancer Analysis Links PARK2 to BCL-XL-Dependent Control of Apoptosis Neoplasia 2017 19 75 83 10.1016/j.neo.2016.12.006 28038320 PMC5198112

118. Ma P. Schwarten M. Schneider L. Boeske A. Henke N. Lisak D. Weber S. Mohrlüder J. Stoldt M. Strodel B. Interaction of Bcl-2 with the Autophagy-Related GABAA Receptor-Associated Protein (GABARAP) J. Biol. Chem. 2013 288 37204 37215 10.1074/jbc.M113.528067 24240096 PMC3873574

119. Grunwald D.S. Otto N.M. Park J.-M. Song D. Kim D.-H. GABARAPs and LC3s Have Opposite Roles in Regulating ULK1 for Autophagy Induction Autophagy 2020 16 600 614 10.1080/15548627.2019.1632620 31208283 PMC7138202

120. Rosa N. Ivanova H. Wagner L.E. Kale J. La Rovere R. Welkenhuyzen K. Louros N. Karamanou S. Shabardina V. Lemmens I. Bcl-XL Acts as an Inhibitor of IP3R Channels, Thereby Antagonizing Ca2+-Driven Apoptosis Cell Death Differ. 2022 29 788 805 10.1038/s41418-021-00894-w 34750538 PMC8990011

121. Ismatullah H. Jabeen I. Kiani Y.S. Structural and Functional Insight into a New Emerging Target IP 3 R in Cancer J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2024 42 2170 2196 10.1080/07391102.2023.2201332 37070253

122. Rong Y.-P. Bultynck G. Aromolaran A.S. Zhong F. Parys J.B. De Smedt H. Mignery G.A. Roderick H.L. Bootman M.D. Distelhorst C.W. The BH4 Domain of Bcl-2 Inhibits ER Calcium Release and Apoptosis by Binding the Regulatory and Coupling Domain of the IP3 Receptor Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009 106 14397 14402 10.1073/pnas.0907555106 19706527 PMC2728114

123. Monaco G. Decrock E. Akl H. Ponsaerts R. Vervliet T. Luyten T. De Maeyer M. Missiaen L. Distelhorst C.W. De Smedt H. Selective Regulation of IP3-Receptor-Mediated Ca2+ Signaling and Apoptosis by the BH4 Domain of Bcl-2 versus Bcl-Xl Cell Death Differ. 2012 19 295 309 10.1038/cdd.2011.97 21818117 PMC3263504

124. Yang J. Vais H. Gu W. Foskett J.K. Biphasic Regulation of InsP 3 Receptor Gating by Dual Ca 2+ Release Channel BH3-like Domains Mediates Bcl-x L Control of Cell Viability Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016 113 E1953 E1962 10.1073/pnas.1517935113 26976600 PMC4822637

125. Vervliet T. Decrock E. Molgó J. Sorrentino V. Missiaen L. Leybaert L. De Smedt H. Kasri N.N. Parys J.B. Bultynck G. Bcl-2 Binds to and Inhibits Ryanodine Receptors J. Cell Sci. 2014 127 2782 2792 10.1242/jcs.150011 24762814

126. Vervliet T. Lemmens I. Vandermarliere E. Decrock E. Ivanova H. Monaco G. Sorrentino V. Kasri N.N. Missiaen L. Martens L. Ryanodine Receptors Are Targeted by Anti-Apoptotic Bcl-XL Involving Its BH4 Domain and Lys87 from Its BH3 Domain Sci. Rep. 2015 5 9641 10.1038/srep09641 25872771 PMC4397538

127. Monaco G. Decrock E. Arbel N. van Vliet A.R. La Rovere R.M. De Smedt H. Parys J.B. Agostinis P. Leybaert L. Shoshan-Barmatz V. The BH4 Domain of Anti-Apoptotic Bcl-XL, but Not That of the Related Bcl-2, Limits the Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 1 (VDAC1)-Mediated Transfer of Pro-Apoptotic Ca 2+ Signals to Mitochondria J. Biol. Chem. 2015 290 9150 9161 10.1074/jbc.M114.622514 25681439 PMC4423701

128. Wu Y. Li X. Jia J. Zhang Y. Li J. Zhu Z. Wang H. Tang J. Hu J. Transmembrane E3 Ligase RNF183 Mediates ER Stress-Induced Apoptosis by Degrading Bcl-XL Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018 115 E2762 E2771 10.1073/pnas.1716439115 29507230 PMC5866564

129. Park H.-A. Licznerski P. Alavian K.N. Shanabrough M. Jonas E.A. Bcl-XL Is Necessary for Neurite Outgrowth in Hippocampal Neurons Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2015 22 93 108 10.1089/ars.2013.5570 24787232 PMC4281845

130. Nguyen T.T.M. Gadet R. Lanfranchi M. Lahaye R.A. Yandiev S. Lohez O. Mikaelian I. Jabbour L. Rimokh R. Courchet J. Mitochondrial Bcl-XL Promotes Brain Synaptogenesis by Controlling Non-Lethal Caspase Activation iScience 2023 26 106674 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106674 37182099 PMC10173740

131. Li H. Alavian K.N. Lazrove E. Mehta N. Jones A. Zhang P. Licznerski P. Graham M. Uo T. Guo J. A Bcl-XL–Drp1 Complex Regulates Synaptic Vesicle Membrane Dynamics during Endocytosis Nat. Cell Biol. 2013 15 773 785 10.1038/ncb2791 23792689 PMC3725990

132. Haughn L. Hawley R.G. Morrison D.K. von Boehmer H. Hockenbery D.M. BCL-2 and BCL-XL Restrict Lineage Choice during Hematopoietic Differentiation J. Biol. Chem. 2003 278 25158 25165 10.1074/jbc.M212849200 12721288

133. Du X. Fu X. Yao K. Lan Z. Xu H. Cui Q. Yang E. Bcl-2 Delays Cell Cycle through Mitochondrial ATP and ROS Cell Cycle 2017 16 707 713 10.1080/15384101.2017.1295182 28278051 PMC5397261

134. Vairo G. Soos T.J. Upton T.M. Zalvide J. DeCaprio J.A. Ewen M.E. Koff A. Adams J.M. Bcl-2 Retards Cell Cycle Entry through P27 Kip1, PRB Relative P130, and Altered E2F Regulation Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000 20 4745 4753 10.1128/MCB.20.13.4745-4753.2000 10848600 PMC85901

135. Yamamoto K. Ichijo H. Korsmeyer S.J. BCL-2 Is Phosphorylated and Inactivated by an ASK1/Jun N-Terminal Protein Kinase Pathway Normally Activated at G 2 /M Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999 19 8469 8478 10.1128/MCB.19.12.8469 10567572 PMC84954

136. Barboule N. Truchet I. Valette A. Localization of Phosphorylated Forms of Bcl-2 in Mitosis: Co-Localization with Ki-67 and Nucleolin in Nuclear Structures and on Mitotic Chromosomes Cell Cycle 2005 4 583 589 10.4161/cc.4.4.1587 15876860

137. Wang J. Beauchemin M. Bertrand R. Bcl-XL Phosphorylation at Ser49 by Polo Kinase 3 during Cell Cycle Progression and Checkpoints Cell. Signal. 2011 23 2030 2038 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.07.017 21840391 PMC3708862

138. Wang J. Beauchemin M. Bertrand R. Phospho-Bcl-x L (Ser62) Plays a Key Role at DNA Damage-Induced G 2 Checkpoint Cell Cycle 2012 11 2159 2169 10.4161/cc.20672 22617334 PMC3368867

139. Wang J. Beauchemin M. Bertrand R. Phospho-Bcl-XL(Ser62) Influences Spindle Assembly and Chromosome Segregation during Mitosis Cell Cycle 2014 13 1313 1326 10.4161/cc.28293 24621501 PMC4014433

140. Baruah P.S. Beauchemin M. Hébert J. Bertrand R. Dynamic Bcl-XL (S49) and (S62) Phosphorylation/Dephosphorylation during Mitosis Prevents Chromosome Instability and Aneuploidy in Normal Human Diploid Fibroblasts PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0159091 10.1371/journal.pone.0159091 27398719 PMC4939973

141. Chattopadhyay A. Chiang C.-W. Yang E. BAD/BCL-XL Heterodimerization Leads to Bypass of G0/G1 Arrest Oncogene 2001 20 4507 4518 10.1038/sj.onc.1204584 11494146

142. Kharbanda S. Saxena S. Yoshida K. Pandey P. Kaneki M. Wang Q. Cheng K. Chen Y.-N. Campbell A. Sudha T. Translocation of SAPK/JNK to Mitochondria and Interaction with Bcl-XL in Response to DNA Damage J. Biol. Chem. 2000 275 322 327 Erratum in J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275 , 19433–19434. 10.1074/jbc.275.1.322 10617621

143. Del Re D.P. Matsuda T. Zhai P. Maejima Y. Jain M.R. Liu T. Li H. Hsu C.-P. Sadoshima J. Mst1 Promotes Cardiac Myocyte Apoptosis through Phosphorylation and Inhibition of Bcl-XL Mol. Cell 2014 54 639 650 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.04.007 24813943 PMC4074544

144. Yu S. Du M. Yin A. Mai Z. Wang Y. Zhao M. Wang X. Chen T. Bcl-XL Inhibits PINK1/Parkin-Dependent Mitophagy by Preventing Mitochondrial Parkin Accumulation Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2020 122 105720 10.1016/j.biocel.2020.105720 32088314

145. Arena G. Gelmetti V. Torosantucci L. Vignone D. Lamorte G. De Rosa P. Cilia E. Jonas E.A. Valente E.M. PINK1 Protects against Cell Death Induced by Mitochondrial Depolarization, by Phosphorylating Bcl-XL and Impairing Its pro-Apoptotic Cleavage Cell Death Differ. 2013 20 920 930 10.1038/cdd.2013.19 23519076 PMC3679455

146. Chang J.-G. Tien N. Chang Y.-C. Lin M.-L. Chen S.-S. Oxidative Stress-Induced Unscheduled CDK1–Cyclin B1 Activity Impairs ER–Mitochondria-Mediated Bioenergetic Metabolism Cells 2021 10 1280 10.3390/cells10061280 34064109 PMC8224302

147. Ruvolo P. Deng X. May W. Phosphorylation of Bcl2 and Regulation of Apoptosis Leukemia 2001 15 515 522 10.1038/sj.leu.2402090 11368354

148. Wu D.-W. Huang C.-C. Chang S.-W. Chen T.-H. Lee H. Bcl-2 Stabilization by Paxillin Confers 5-Fluorouracil Resistance in Colorectal Cancer Cell Death Differ. 2015 22 779 789 10.1038/cdd.2014.170 25323586 PMC4392075

149. Ma K. Zhang Z. Chang R. Cheng H. Mu C. Zhao T. Chen L. Zhang C. Luo Q. Lin J. Dynamic PGAM5 Multimers Dephosphorylate BCL-XL or FUNDC1 to Regulate Mitochondrial and Cellular Fate Cell Death Differ. 2020 27 1036 1051 10.1038/s41418-019-0396-4 31367011 PMC7206082

150. Li W. Ma Y. He L. Li H. Chu Y. Jiang Z. Zhao X. Nie Y. Wang X. Wang H. Protease-Activated Receptor 2 Stabilizes Bcl-XL and Regulates EGFR–Targeted Therapy Response in Colorectal Cancer Cancer Lett. 2021 517 14 23 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.05.040 34098062

151. Ni F. Yan C. Zhou S. Hui P. Du Y. Zheng L. Yu J. Hu X. Zhang Z. Repression of GRIM19 Expression Potentiates Cisplatin Chemoresistance in Advanced Bladder Cancer Cells via Disrupting Ubiquitination-Mediated Bcl-XL Degradation Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2018 82 593 605 10.1007/s00280-018-3651-3 30032449

152. Um H.-D. Bcl-2 Family Proteins as Regulators of Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis: A Review Focusing on Mitochondrial Respiration and Reactive Oxygen Species Oncotarget 2016 7 5193 5203 10.18632/oncotarget.6405 26621844 PMC4868680

153. Chen Z.X. Pervaiz S. Involvement of Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunits Va and Vb in the Regulation of Cancer Cell Metabolism by Bcl-2 Cell Death Differ. 2010 17 408 420 10.1038/cdd.2009.132 19834492

154. Bessou M. Lopez J. Gadet R. Deygas M. Popgeorgiev N. Poncet D. Nougarède A. Billard P. Mikaelian I. Gonzalo P. The Apoptosis Inhibitor Bcl-XL Controls Breast Cancer Cell Migration through Mitochondria-Dependent Reactive Oxygen Species Production Oncogene 2020 39 3056 3074 10.1038/s41388-020-1212-9 32066881

155. Choi S. Chen Z. Tang L.H. Fang Y. Shin S.J. Panarelli N.C. Chen Y.-T. Li Y. Jiang X. Du Y.-C.N. Bcl-XL Promotes Metastasis Independent of Its Anti-Apoptotic Activity Nat. Commun. 2016 7 10384 10.1038/ncomms10384 26785948 PMC4735924

156. Zhang T. Li S. Tan Y.A. Chen X. Zhang C. Chen Z. Mishra B. Na J.H. Choi S. Shin S.J. Bcl-XL Is Translocated to the Nucleus via CtBP2 to Epigenetically Promote Metastasis Cancer Lett. 2024 604 217240 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217240 39265800 PMC11471366

157. España L. Fernández Y. Rubio N. Torregrosa A. Blanco J. Sierra A. Overexpression of Bcl-XL in Human Breast Cancer Cells Enhances Organ-Selective Lymph Node Metastasis Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2004 87 33 44 10.1023/B:BREA.0000041579.51902.89 15377849

158. Singh R. Gupta S.C. Peng W.-X. Zhou N. Pochampally R. Atfi A. Watabe K. Lu Z. Mo Y.-Y. Regulation of Alternative Splicing of Bcl-x by BC200 Contributes to Breast Cancer Pathogenesis Cell Death Dis. 2016 7 e2262 10.1038/cddis.2016.168 27277684 PMC5143396

159. Skov N. Alves C.L. Ehmsen S. Ditzel H.J. Aurora Kinase A and Bcl-XL Inhibition Suppresses Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022 23 10053 10.3390/ijms231710053 36077449 PMC9456092

160. Ricca A. Biroccio A. Del Bufalo D. Mackay A.R. Santoni A. Cippitelli M. Bcl-2 over-Expression Enhances NF-?B Activity and Induces Mmp-9 Transcription in Human MCF7ADR Breast-Cancer Cells Int. J. Cancer 2000 86 188 196 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000415)86:2<188::AID-IJC7>3.0.CO;2-W 10738245

161. Noujaim D. van Golen C.M. van Golen K.L. Grauman A. Feldman E.L. N-Myc and Bcl-2 Coexpression Induces MMP-2 Secretion and Activation in Human Neuroblastoma Cells Oncogene 2002 21 4549 4557 10.1038/sj.onc.1205552 12085233

162. Choi J. Choi K. Benveniste E.N. Hong Y.-S. Lee J.-H. Kim J. Park K. Bcl-2 Promotes Invasion and Lung Metastasis by Inducing Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Cancer Res. 2005 65 5554 5560 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4570 15994927

163. Duan S. Li J. Tian J. Yin H. Zhai Q. Wu Y. Yao S. Zhang L. Crosstalk between Let-7a-5p and BCL-XL in the Initiation of Toxic Autophagy in Lung Cancer Mol. Ther.-Oncolytics 2019 15 69 78 10.1016/j.omto.2019.08.010 31650027 PMC6804504

164. Ho J. Kang G.Y. Lee S. Kim J. Bae I.H. Hwang S. Um H. Bcl-X L and STAT3 Mediate Malignant Actions of Γ-irradiation in Lung Cancer Cells Cancer Sci. 2010 101 1417 1423 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01552.x 20331635 PMC11159096

165. Klein S. Abraham M. Bulvik B. Dery E. Weiss I.D. Barashi N. Abramovitch R. Wald H. Harel Y. Olam D. CXCR4 Promotes Neuroblastoma Growth and Therapeutic Resistance through MiR-15a/16-1–Mediated ERK and BCL2/Cyclin D1 Pathways Cancer Res. 2018 78 1471 1483 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0454 29259008

166. Zhu Y. Wen X. Zhao P. MicroRNA-365 Inhibits Cell Growth and Promotes Apoptosis in Melanoma by Targeting BCL2 and Cyclin D1 (CCND1) Med. Sci. Monit. 2018 24 3679 3692 10.12659/MSM.909633 29858490 PMC6011806

167. D’Aguanno S. Valentini E. Tupone M.G. Desideri M. Di Martile M. Spagnuolo M. Buglioni S. Ercolani C. Falcone I. De Dominici M. Semaphorin 5A Drives Melanoma Progression: Role of Bcl-2, MiR-204 and c-Myb J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018 37 278 10.1186/s13046-018-0933-x 30454024 PMC6245779

168. Zhang S. Wan H. Zhang X. LncRNA LHFPL3-AS1 Contributes to Tumorigenesis of Melanoma Stem Cells via the MiR-181a-5p/BCL2 Pathway Cell Death Dis. 2020 11 950 10.1038/s41419-020-03141-1 33149126 PMC7643105

169. Leiter U. Schmid R.M. Kaskel P. Peter R.U. Krähn G. Antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL in Advanced Malignant Melanoma Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2000 292 225 232 10.1007/s004030050479 10867810

170. Trisciuoglio D. Desideri M. Ciuffreda L. Mottolese M. Ribatti D. Vacca A. Del Rosso M. Marcocci L. Zupi G. Del Bufalo D. Bcl-2 Overexpression in Melanoma Cells Increases Tumor Progression-associated Properties and in Vivo Tumor Growth J. Cell. Physiol. 2005 205 414 421 10.1002/jcp.20413 15920759

171. Trisciuoglio D. Tupone M.G. Desideri M. Di Martile M. Gabellini C. Buglioni S. Pallocca M. Alessandrini G. D’Aguanno S. Del Bufalo D. BCL-XL Overexpression Promotes Tumor Progression-Associated Properties Cell Death Dis. 2017 8 3216 10.1038/s41419-017-0055-y 29238043 PMC5870591

172. Rimkus T.K. Arrigo A.B. Zhu D. Carpenter R.L. Sirkisoon S. Doheny D. Regua A.T. Wong G.L. Manore S. Wagner C. NEDD4 Degrades TUSC2 to Promote Glioblastoma Progression Cancer Lett. 2022 531 124 135 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.01.029 35167936 PMC8920049

173. Huang X. Zhang Y. Tang Y. Butler N. Kim J. Guessous F. Schiff D. Mandell J. Abounader R. A Novel PTEN/Mutant P53/c-Myc/Bcl-XL Axis Mediates Context-Dependent Oncogenic Effects of PTEN with Implications for Cancer Prognosis and Therapy Neoplasia 2013 15 952 965 10.1593/neo.13376 23908595 PMC3730046

174. Wick W. Wild-Bode C. Frank B. Weller M. BCL-2-induced Glioma Cell Invasiveness Depends on Furin-like Proteases J. Neurochem. 2004 91 1275 1283 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02806.x 15584904

175. Weiler M. Bähr O. Hohlweg U. Naumann U. Rieger J. Huang H. Tabatabai G. Krell H.W. Ohgaki H. Weller M. BCL-XL: Time-Dependent Dissociation between Modulation of Apoptosis and Invasiveness in Human Malignant Glioma Cells Cell Death Differ. 2006 13 1156 1169 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401786 16254573

176. Trisciuoglio D. Iervolino A. Candiloro A. Fibbi G. Fanciulli M. Zangemeister-Wittke U. Zupi G. Del Bufalo D. Bcl-2 Induction of Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor Expression in Human Cancer Cells through Sp1 Activation J. Biol. Chem. 2004 279 6737 6745 10.1074/jbc.M308938200 14660675

177. D’Aguanno S. Brignone M. Scalera S. Chiacchiarini M. Di Martile M. Valentini E. De Nicola F. Ricci A. Pelle F. Botti C. Bcl-2 Dependent Modulation of Hippo Pathway in Cancer Cells Cell Commun. Signal. 2024 22 277 10.1186/s12964-024-01647-1 38755629 PMC11097437

178. De Luca T. Pelosi A. Trisciuoglio D. D’Aguanno S. Desideri M. Farini V. Di Martile M. Bellei B. Tupone M.G. Candiloro A. MiR-211 and MITF Modulation by Bcl-2 Protein in Melanoma Cells Mol. Carcinog. 2016 55 2304 2312 10.1002/mc.22437 26599548

179. Wu X. Zhang L. Toombs J. Kuo Y.-C. Piazza J.T. Tuladhar R. Barrett Q. Fan C. Zhang X. Walensky L.D. Extra-Mitochondrial Prosurvival BCL-2 Proteins Regulate Gene Transcription by Inhibiting the SUFU Tumour Suppressor Nat. Cell Biol. 2017 19 1226 1236 10.1038/ncb3616 28945232 PMC5657599

180. Koehler B.C. Scherr A.-L. Lorenz S. Urbanik T. Kautz N. Elssner C. Welte S. Bermejo J.L. Jäger D. Schulze-Bergkamen H. Beyond Cell Death—Antiapoptotic Bcl-2 Proteins Regulate Migration and Invasion of Colorectal Cancer Cells In Vitro PLoS ONE 2013 8 e76446 10.1371/journal.pone.0076446 24098503 PMC3789675

181. Gopalan V. Ebrahimi F. Islam F. Vider J. Qallandar O.B. Pillai S. Lu C.-T. Lam A.K. Tumour Suppressor Properties of MiR-15a and Its Regulatory Effects on BCL2 and SOX2 Proteins in Colorectal Carcinomas Exp. Cell Res. 2018 370 245 253 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.06.025 29958837

182. Saleh H.A. Jackson H. Khatib G. Banerjee M. Correlation of Bcl-2 Oncoprotein Immunohistochemical Expression with Proliferation Index and Histopathologic Parameters in Colorectal Neoplasia Pathol. Oncol. Res. 1999 5 273 279 10.1053/paor.1999.0231 10607921

183. Kattan S.W. Hobani Y.H. Abubakr Babteen N. Alghamdi S.A. Toraih E.A. Ibrahiem A.T. Fawzy M.S. Faisal S. Association of B-cell Lymphoma 2/MicroRNA-497 Gene Expression Ratio Score with Metastasis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-matched Cohort Analysis J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022 36 e24227 10.1002/jcla.24227 34994989 PMC8841134

184. Xu W. Nie C. Chen X. DUSP4 Inhibits Autophagic Cell Death and Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer by Regulating BCL2-Beclin1/Bax Signaling Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023 50 3229 3239 10.1007/s11033-023-08270-2 36705792

185. Wang G. Yang H. CircRNA DUSP16 Knockdown Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Progression by Regulating the MiR-432-5p/E2F6 Axis Cancer Manag. Res. 2021 13 6599 6609 10.2147/CMAR.S323437 34456589 PMC8387644

186. Major J.L. Salih M. Tuana B.S. Interplay between the E2F Pathway and β-Adrenergic Signaling in the Pathological Hypertrophic Response of Myocardium J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2015 84 179 190 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.04.026 25944088

187. Kondo E. Miyake T. Shibata M. Kimura T. Iwagaki H. Nakamura S. Tanaka T. Ohara N. Ichimura K. Oka T. Expression of Phosphorylated Ser70 of Bcl-2 Correlates with Malignancy in Human Colorectal Neoplasms Clin. Cancer Res. 2005 11 7255 7263 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0274 16243795

188. Yang J. Sun M. Zhang A. Lv C. De W. Wang Z. Adenovirus-Mediated SiRNA Targeting Bcl-XL Inhibits Proliferation, Reduces Invasion and Enhances Radiosensitivity of Human Colorectal Cancer Cells World J. Surg. Oncol. 2011 9 117 10.1186/1477-7819-9-117 21970601 PMC3198948

189. Ma J. Liu Y. Yuan J. Ma Y. Zhao X. Chen K. Zhang X. Zhang F. Wang H. Bcl-XL Mediates Interferon-Beta Secretion by Protease-Activated Receptor 2 Deficiency through the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore in Colorectal Cancer Metastasis Cancer Lett. 2024 580 216483 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216483 37972702

190. Cui C. Zhai D. Cai L. Duan Q. Xie L. Yu J. Long Noncoding RNA HEIH Promotes Colorectal Cancer Tumorigenesis via Counteracting MiR-939–Mediated Transcriptional Repression of Bcl-XL Cancer Res. Treat. 2018 50 992 1008 10.4143/crt.2017.226 29081216 PMC6056985

191. Ravi D. Nalinakumari K.R. Rajaram R.S. Nair M.K. Pillai M.R. Expression of Programmed Cell Death Regulatory P53 and Bcl-2 Proteins in Oral Lesions Cancer Lett. 1996 105 139 146 10.1016/0304-3835(96)04258-9 8697436

192. Dwivedi R. Chandra S. Mehrotra D. Raj V. Pandey R. Predicting Transition from Oral Pre-Malignancy to Malignancy via Bcl-2 Immuno-Expression: Evidence and Lacunae J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res. 2020 10 397 403 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.003 PMC7394759 32775181

193. Loro L. Decreased Expression of Bcl-2 in Moderate and Severe Oral Epithelia Dysplasias Oral Oncol. 2002 38 691 698 10.1016/S1368-8375(02)00002-7 12167422

194. Singh B.B. Chandler F.W. Whitaker S.B. Forbes-Nelson A.E. Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Bcl-2 Oncoprotein in Oral Dysplasia and Carcinoma Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 1998 85 692 698 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90037-3 9638703

195. Piattelli A. Rubini C. Fioroni M. Iezzi G. Santinelli A. Prevalence of P53, Bcl-2, and Ki-67 Immunoreactivity and of Apoptosis in Normal Oral Epithelium and in Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of the Oral Cavity J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2002 60 532 540 10.1053/joms.2002.31851 11988932

196. Niedzielska I. Sypnilewski D. Niedzielski Z. Expression of Bcl-2 on Oral Cavity Pathologies Med. Sci. Monit. 2007 13 BR84 BR88 17325632

197. Juneja S. Chaitanya N.B. Agarwal M. Immunohistochemical Expression of Bcl-2 in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Indian J. Cancer 2015 52 505 10.4103/0019-509X.178411 26960459

198. McAlinden R. Maxwell P. Napier S. Hamilton P. Cowan C. Lundy F. Lamey P. Marley J. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology: Bcl-2 Expression in Sequential Biopsies of Potentially Malignant Oral Mucosal Lesions Assessed by Immunocytochemistry Oral Dis. 2000 6 318 326 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2000.tb00145.x 11002415

199. Schoelch M. Le Q. Silverman S. Jr. McMillan A. Dekker N. Fu K. Ziober B. Regezi J. Apoptosis-Associated Proteins and the Development of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Oral Oncol. 1999 35 77 85 10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00065-7 10211314

200. Sampaio-Góes F.C.G. Oliveira D.T. Dorta R.G. Nonogaki S. Landman G. Nishimoto I.N. Kowalski L.P. Expression of PCNA, P53, Bax, and Bcl-X in Oral Poorly Differentiated and Basaloid Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Relationships with Prognosis Head Neck 2005 27 982 989 10.1002/hed.20258 16136583

201. Alam M. Mishra R. Bcl-XL Expression and Regulation in the Progression, Recurrence, and Cisplatin Resistance of Oral Cancer Life Sci. 2021 280 119705 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119705 34111459

202. Zuo J. Ishikawa T. Boutros S. Xiao Z. Humtsoe J.O. Kramer R.H. Bcl-2 Overexpression Induces a Partial Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition and Promotes Squamous Carcinoma Cell Invasion and Metastasis Mol. Cancer Res. 2010 8 170 182 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0354 20145039

203. Kannan K. Latha P.N.L. Shanmugam G. Expression of Bcl-2 Oncoprotein in Indian Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas Oral Oncol. 1998 34 373 376 10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00037-2 9861342

204. Yao L. Iwai M. Furuta I. Correlations of Bcl-2 and P53 Expression with the Clinicopathological Features in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinomas Oral Oncol. 1999 35 56 62 10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00055-4 10211311

205. Chen Y. Kayano T. Takagi M. Dysregulated Expression of Bcl-2 and Bax in Oral Carcinomas: Evidence of Post-Transcriptional Control J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2000 29 63 69 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2000.290203.x 10718401

206. Akbarin M.M. Farjami Z. Acevedo-Jiménez G.E. Murillo C.R. González-Fernández V.D. de María Avila-De la Vega L. Martínez M.A. Santos H.J.N. Álvarez H.R. BCL-2 Family Dysregulation in HTLV-1 and BLV Pathogenesis and Its Implications for Leukemogenesis and Therapy Mol. Biol. Rep. 2026 53 61 10.1007/s11033-025-11216-5 PMC12594674 41201565

207. Chen J. Li C. Zhan R. Yin Y. SPG6 Supports Development of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Regulating BMPR2-Smad-Bcl-2/Bcl-Xl Signaling Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018 501 220 225 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.220 29715457

208. Högstrand K. Hejll E. Sander B. Rozell B. Larsson L.-G. Grandien A. Inhibition of the Intrinsic but Not the Extrinsic Apoptosis Pathway Accelerates and Drives Myc-Driven Tumorigenesis Towards Acute Myeloid Leukemia PLoS ONE 2012 7 e31366 10.1371/journal.pone.0031366 22393362 PMC3290626

209. Singh L. Pushker N. Saini N. Sen S. Sharma A. Bakhshi S. Chawla B. Kashyap S. Expression of Pro-apoptotic Bax and Anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 Proteins in Human Retinoblastoma Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015 43 259 267 10.1111/ceo.12397 25132102

210. Li C. Dai L. Zhang J. Zhang Y. Lin Y. Cheng L. Tian H. Zhang X. Wang Q. Yang Q. Follistatin-like Protein 5 Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression by Inducing Caspase-dependent Apoptosis and Regulating Bcl-2 Family Proteins J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018 22 6190 6201 Correction in J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021 , 25 , 3665. 10.1111/jcmm.13906 30255547 PMC6237577

211. Zhang X. Fang J. Chen S. Wang W. Meng S. Liu B. Nonconserved MiR-608 Suppresses Prostate Cancer Progression through RAC2/PAK4/LIMK1 and BCL2L1/Caspase-3 Pathways by Targeting the 3′-UTRs of RAC2/BCL2L1 and the Coding Region of PAK4 Cancer Med. 2019 8 5716 5734 10.1002/cam4.2455 31389670 PMC6746107

212. Ikezawa K. Hikita H. Shigekawa M. Iwahashi K. Eguchi H. Sakamori R. Tatsumi T. Takehara T. Increased Bcl-XL Expression in Pancreatic Neoplasia Promotes Carcinogenesis by Inhibiting Senescence and Apoptosis Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017 4 185 200.e1 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.02.001 28948203 PMC5604117

213. Du Y.-C.N. Lewis B.C. Hanahan D. Varmus H. Assessing Tumor Progression Factors by Somatic Gene Transfer into a Mouse Model: Bcl-XL Promotes Islet Tumor Cell Invasion PLoS Biol. 2007 5 e276 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050276 17941720 PMC2020504

214. Hager J.H. Ulanet D.B. Hennighausen L. Hanahan D. Genetic Ablation of Bcl-x Attenuates Invasiveness without Affecting Apoptosis or Tumor Growth in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Cancer PLoS ONE 2009 4 e4455 10.1371/journal.pone.0004455 19209227 PMC2635964

215. Changphasuk P. Inpad C. Horpaopan S. Khunchai S. Phimsen S. Surangkul D. Janvilisri T. Silsirivanit A. Kaewkong W. SRPK Inhibitors Reduce the Phosphorylation and Translocation of SR Protein Splicing Factors, Thereby Correcting BIN1, MCL-1 and BCL2 Splicing Errors and Enabling Apoptosis of Cholangiocarcinoma Cells Front. Biosci. 2024 16 17 10.31083/j.fbs1603017 39344395

216. Giorgini S. Trisciuoglio D. Gabellini C. Desideri M. Castellini L. Colarossi C. Zangemeister-Wittke U. Zupi G. Del Bufalo D. Modulation of Bcl-XL in Tumor Cells Regulates Angiogenesis through CXCL8 Expression Mol. Cancer Res. 2007 5 761 771 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0088 17699103

217. Gabellini C. Castellini L. Trisciuoglio D. Kracht M. Zupi G. Del Bufalo D. Involvement of Nuclear Factor-kappa B in Bcl-xL-induced Interleukin 8 Expression in Glioblastoma J. Neurochem. 2008 107 871 882 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05661.x 18786178

218. Gabellini C. Gómez-Abenza E. Ibáñez-Molero S. Tupone M.G. Pérez-Oliva A.B. de Oliveira S. Del Bufalo D. Mulero V. Interleukin 8 Mediates Bcl-xL-induced Enhancement of Human Melanoma Cell Dissemination and Angiogenesis in a Zebrafish Xenograft Model Int. J. Cancer 2018 142 584 596 10.1002/ijc.31075 28949016

219. Trisciuoglio D. Iervolino A. Zupi G. Del Bufalo D. Involvement of PI3K and MAPK Signaling in Bcl-2-Induced Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in Melanoma Cells Mol. Biol. Cell 2005 16 4153 4162 10.1091/mbc.e04-12-1087 15987743 PMC1196326

220. Diensthuber M. Potinius M. Rodt T. Stan A.C. Welkoborsky H.-J. Samii M. Schreyögg J. Lenarz T. Stöver T. Expression of Bcl-2 Is Associated with Microvessel Density in Olfactory Neuroblastoma J. Neurooncol. 2008 89 131 139 10.1007/s11060-008-9602-9 18431543

221. Iervolino A. Trisciuoglio D. Ribatti D. Candiloro A. Biroccio A. Zupi G. Del Bufalo D. Bcl-2 Overexpression in Human Melanoma Cells Increases Angiogenesis through VEGF MRNA Stabilization and HIF-1mediated Transcriptional Activity FASEB J. 2002 16 1453 1455 10.1096/fj.02-0122fje 12205045

222. Biroccio A. Candiloro A. Mottolese M. Sapora O. Albini A. Zupi G. Del Bufalo D. Bcl-2 Overexpression and Hypoxia Synergistically Act to Modulate Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and in Vivo Angiogenesis in a Breast Carcinoma Line FASEB J. 2000 14 652 660 10.1096/fasebj.14.5.652 10744622

223. Hang X. Zhao L. Wu B. Li S. Liu P. Xu J. Wang X. Chi P. Chen C. Niu T. BCL-2 Isoform β Promotes Angiogenesis by TRiC-Mediated Upregulation of VEGF-A in Lymphoma Oncogene 2022 41 3655 3663 10.1038/s41388-022-02372-0 35701534

224. Perrone G. Vincenzi B. Santini D. Verzì A. Tonini G. Vetrani A. Rabitti C. Correlation of P53 and Bcl-2 Expression with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Microvessel Density (MVD) and Clinico-Pathological Features in Colon Cancer Cancer Lett. 2004 208 227 234 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.11.032 15142682

225. Sun T. Sun B. Zhao X. Zhao N. Dong X. Che N. Yao Z. Ma Y. Gu Q. Zong W. Promotion of Tumor Cell Metastasis and Vasculogenic Mimicry by Way of Transcription Coactivation by Bcl-2 and Twist1: A Study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hepatology 2011 54 1690 1706 10.1002/hep.24543 21748764

226. Schmitt C.A. Rosenthal C.T. Lowe S.W. Genetic Analysis of Chemoresistance in Primary Murine Lymphomas Nat. Med. 2000 6 1029 1035 10.1038/79542 10973324

227. Maji S. Panda S. Samal S.K. Shriwas O. Rath R. Pellecchia M. Emdad L. Das S.K. Fisher P.B. Dash R. Bcl-2 Antiapoptotic Family Proteins and Chemoresistance in Cancer Adv. Cancer Res. 2018 137 37 75 29405977 10.1016/bs.acr.2017.11.001

228. Kassim S.K. Ali H.S. Sallam M.M. Fayed S.T. Seada L.S. Abd-Elkawy E. Seada M.A. Khalifa A. Increased Bcl-2 Expression Is Associated with Primary Resistance to Chemotherapy in Human Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Clin. Biochem. 1999 32 333 338 10.1016/S0009-9120(99)00026-0 10480447

229. Konopleva M. Zhao S. Hu W. Jiang S. Snell V. Weidner D. Jackson C.E. Zhang X. Champlin R. Estey E. The Anti-apoptotic Genes Bcl-X L and Bcl-2 Are Over-expressed and Contribute to Chemoresistance of Non-proliferating Leukaemic CD34 + Cells Br. J. Haematol. 2002 118 521 534 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03637.x 12139741

230. Gioacchini F.M. Alicandri-Ciufelli M. Rubini C. Magliulo G. Re M. Prognostic Value of Bcl-2 Expression in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx: A Systematic Review Int. J. Biol. Markers 2015 30 155 160 10.5301/jbm.5000116 25588854

231. Abdel Raheem A.M. Hameed D.A. ElGanainy E.O. Mosad E. Abdelwanis M.E. Kamel N.A. Hammouda H.M. Abdelaziz M.A. Hemeyda K. Can Bcl-XL Expression Predict the Radio Sensitivity of Bilharzial-Related Squamous Bladder Carcinoma? A Prospective Comparative Study BMC Cancer 2011 11 16 10.1186/1471-2407-11-16 21226954 PMC3033850

232. Han J.-Y. Hong E.K. Choi B.G. Park J.N. Kim K.W. Kang J.H. Jin J.-Y. Park S.Y. Hong Y.S. Lee K.S. Death Receptor 5 and Bcl-2 Protein Expression as Predictors of Tumor Response to Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Med. Oncol. 2003 20 355 362 10.1385/MO:20:4:355 14716031

233. Thummuri D. Khan S. Underwood P.W. Zhang P. Wiegand J. Zhang X. Budamagunta V. Sobh A. Tagmount A. Loguinov A. Overcoming Gemcitabine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer Using the BCL-XL–Specific Degrader DT2216 Mol. Cancer Ther. 2022 21 184 192 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0474 34667112 PMC8742767

234. Shi X. Dou Y. Zhou K. Huo J. Yang T. Qin T. Liu W. Wang S. Yang D. Chang L. Targeting the Bcl-2 Family and P-Glycoprotein Reverses Paclitaxel Resistance in Human Esophageal Carcinoma Cell Line Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017 90 897 905 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.04.043 28441715

235. Bauer J.A. Kumar B. Cordell K.G. Prince M.E. Tran H.H. Wolf G.T. Chepeha D.B. Teknos T.N. Wang S. Eisbruch A. Targeting Apoptosis to Overcome Cisplatin Resistance: A Translational Study in Head and Neck Cancer Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2007 69 S106 S108 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.080 17848273 PMC2064007

236. Williams J. Lucas P.C. Griffith K.A. Choi M. Fogoros S. Hu Y.Y. Liu J.R. Expression of Bcl-XL in Ovarian Carcinoma Is Associated with Chemoresistance and Recurrent Disease Gynecol. Oncol. 2005 96 287 295 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.10.026 15661210

237. Sobol B. Azzam Nieto O. Eberlein E.L. Scherr A.-L. Ismail L. Kessler A. Nader L. Schwab M. Hoffmeister P. Schmitt N. Specific Targeting of Antiapoptotic Bcl-2 Proteins as a Radiosensitizing Approach in Solid Tumors Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022 23 7850 10.3390/ijms23147850 35887198 PMC9319836

238. Minn A.J. Rudin C.M. Boise L.H. Thompson C.B. Expression of Bcl-XL Can Confer a Multidrug Resistance Phenotype Blood 1995 86 1903 1910 10.1182/blood.V86.5.1903.bloodjournal8651903 7655019

239. Kim D.W. Kim K.-O. Shin M.J. Ha J.H. Seo S.W. Yang J. Lee F.Y. SiRNA-Based Targeting of Antiapoptotic Genes Can Reverse Chemoresistance in P-Glycoprotein Expressing Chondrosarcoma Cells Mol. Cancer 2009 8 28 10.1186/1476-4598-8-28 19445670 PMC2689171

240. Beale P.J. Rogers P. Boxall F. Sharp S.Y. Kelland L.R. BCL-2 Family Protein Expression and Platinum Drug Resistance in Ovarian Carcinoma Br. J. Cancer 2000 82 436 440 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0939 10646901 PMC2363292

241. Geng M. Wang L. Li P. Correlation between Chemosensitivity to Anticancer Drugs and Bcl-2 Expression in Gastric Cancer Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2013 6 2554 2559 24228120 PMC3816827

242. Huang D.C. Cory S. Strasser A. Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and Adenovirus Protein E1B19kD Are Functionally Equivalent in Their Ability to Inhibit Cell Death Oncogene 1997 14 405 414 10.1038/sj.onc.1200848 9053837

243. Zhao Y. Zhang C. Zeng B. Wu X. Gao T.-T. Oda Y. Enhanced Chemosensitivity of Drug-Resistant Osteosarcoma Cells by Lentivirus-Mediated Bcl-2 Silencing Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009 390 642 647 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.10.020 19818735

244. Cooke P.W. James N.D. Ganesan R. Burton A. Young L.S. Wallace D.M.A. Bcl-2 Expression Identifies Patients with Advanced Bladder Cancer Treated by Radiotherapy Who Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy BJU Int. 2000 85 829 835 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00612.x 10792161

245. Michaud W.A. Nichols A.C. Mroz E.A. Faquin W.C. Clark J.R. Begum S. Westra W.H. Wada H. Busse P.M. Ellisen L.W. Bcl-2 Blocks Cisplatin-Induced Apoptosis and Predicts Poor Outcome Following Chemoradiation Treatment in Advanced Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res. 2009 15 1645 1654 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2581 19240170 PMC2745309

246. Yang D. Zhan M. Chen T. Chen W. Zhang Y. Xu S. Yan J. Huang Q. Wang J. MiR-125b-5p Enhances Chemotherapy Sensitivity to Cisplatin by down-Regulating Bcl2 in Gallbladder Cancer Sci. Rep. 2017 7 43109 10.1038/srep43109 28256505 PMC5335654

247. Wang F. Yu D. Liu Z. Wang R. Xu Y. Cui H. Zhao T. MiR-125b Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Enhances Chemosensitivity to Cisplatin in Osteosarcoma Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2016 15 NP105 NP112 10.1177/1533034615618849 26744308

248. Ryan J. Tivnan A. Fay J. Bryan K. Meehan M. Creevey L. Lynch J. Bray I.M. O’Meara A. Davidoff A.M. MicroRNA-204 Increases Sensitivity of Neuroblastoma Cells to Cisplatin and Is Associated with a Favourable Clinical Outcome Br. J. Cancer 2012 107 967 976 Erratum in Br. J. Cancer 2012 , 107 , 1203. 10.1038/bjc.2012.356 22892391 PMC3464768

249. Hsu C.-C. Tsai K.-Y. Su Y.-F. Chien C.-Y. Chen Y.-C. Wu Y.-C. Liu S.-Y. Shieh Y.-S. A7-Nicotine Acetylcholine Receptor Mediated Nicotine Induced Cell Survival and Cisplatin Resistance in Oral Cancer Arch. Oral Biol. 2020 111 104653 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104653 31935534

250. Liu Y. Shi L. Yuan C. Feng Y. Li M. Liu H. Chen X. Yao D. Wang Q. Downregulation of ITIH3 Contributes to Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy Resistance in Ovarian Carcinoma via the Bcl-2 Mediated Anti-apoptosis Signaling Pathway Oncol. Lett. 2022 25 61 10.3892/ol.2022.13646 36644154 PMC9827458

251. Deverman B.E. Cook B.L. Manson S.R. Niederhoff R.A. Langer E.M. Rosová I. Kulans L.A. Fu X. Weinberg J.S. Heinecke J.W. Bcl-XL Deamidation Is a Critical Switch in the Regulation of the Response to DNA Damage Cell 2002 111 51 62 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00972-8 12372300

252. Chang C.-Y. Lin Y.-M. Lee W.-P. Hsu H.-H. Chen E.I.T. Involvement of Bcl-XL Deamidation in E1A-Mediated Cisplatin Sensitization of Ovarian Cancer Cells Oncogene 2006 25 2656 2665 10.1038/sj.onc.1209294 16331250

253. Lizárraga-Verdugo E. Ruiz-García E. López-Camarillo C. Bermúdez M. Avendaño-Félix M. Ramos-Payán R. Romero-Quintana G. Ayala-Ham A. Villegas-Mercado C. Pérez-Plasencia C. Cell Survival Is Regulated via SOX9/BCL2L1 Axis in HCT-116 Colorectal Cancer Cell Line J. Oncol. 2020 2020 5701527 10.1155/2020/5701527 32411238 PMC7206885

254. Lee S.D. Yu D. Lee D.Y. Shin H. Jo J. Lee Y.C. Upregulated MicroRNA-193a-3p Is Responsible for Cisplatin Resistance in CD44(+) Gastric Cancer Cells Cancer Sci. 2019 110 662 673 10.1111/cas.13894 30485589 PMC6361556

255. Cao X. Rodarte C. Zhang L. Morgan C.D. Littlejohn J. Smythe W.R. Bcl2/Bcl-Xl Inhibitor Engenders Apoptosis and Increases Chemo-Sensitivity in Mesothelioma Cancer Biol. Ther. 2007 6 246 252 10.4161/cbt.6.2.3626 17224645

256. Cloutier A. Shkreta L. Toutant J. Durand M. Thibault P. Chabot B. HnRNP A1/A2 and Sam68 Collaborate with SRSF10 to Control the Alternative Splicing Response to Oxaliplatin-Mediated DNA Damage Sci. Rep. 2018 8 2206 10.1038/s41598-018-20360-x 29396485 PMC5797138

257. GC B. Du P. Zhang Y. Yang L. Dong F. Bcl-XL Is Important for the Antiapoptotic Activity of Gfi1 and Is Upregulated by Gfi1 through Hemgn J. Immunol. 2025 214 1046 1058 10.1093/jimmun/vkae066 40262274 PMC12123215

258. Del Bufalo D. Biroccio A. Trisciuoglio D. Bruno T. Floridi A. Aquino A. Zupi G. Bcl-2 Has Differing Effects on the Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells Depending on the Antineoplastic Drug Used Eur. J. Cancer 2002 38 2455 2462 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00391-X 12460791

259. Hernandez-Luna M.A. Rocha-Zavaleta L. Vega M.I. Huerta-Yepez S. Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α Induces Chemoresistance Phenotype in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Cell Line via up-Regulation of Bcl- XL Leuk. Lymphoma 2013 54 1048 1055 10.3109/10428194.2012.733874 23013270

260. Park S.S. Lee D.M. Lim J.H. Lee D. Park S.J. Kim H.M. Sohn S. Yoon G. Eom Y.W. Jeong S.-Y. Pyrrolidine Dithiocarbamate Reverses Bcl-XL-Mediated Apoptotic Resistance to Doxorubicin by Inducing Paraptosis Carcinogenesis 2018 39 458 470 10.1093/carcin/bgy003 29329420

261. Fan F. Xiuwen Z. Yongyi L. Weiping C. Lu G. Yueqin L. Qi C. Huiling S. Xiaolan Z. Wenlin X. The CD44 Variant Induces K562 Cell Acquired with Resistance to Adriamycin via NF-ΚB/Snail/Bcl-2 Pathway Med. Hypotheses 2018 121 142 148 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.09.002 30396468

262. Elsamany S. Farooq M.U. Elsirafy M. Shamaa S. Sakr M. Phase II Study of Low-Dose Fixed-Rate Infusion of Gemcitabine Combined with Cisplatin and Dexamethasone in Resistant Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Correlation with Bcl-2 and MDR Expression Med. Oncol. 2014 31 872 10.1007/s12032-014-0872-0 24496564

263. Bold R.J. Chandra J. McConkey D.J. Gemcitabine-Induced Programmed Cell Death (Apoptosis) of Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Is Determined by Bcl-2 Content Ann. Surg. Oncol. 1999 6 279 285 10.1007/s10434-999-0279-x 10340887

264. Nocquet L. Roul J. Lefebvre C.C. Duarte L. Campone M. Juin P.P. Souazé F. Low BCL-XL Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Favors Chemotherapy Efficacy, and This Effect Is Limited by Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Sci. Rep. 2024 14 14177 10.1038/s41598-024-64696-z 38898061 PMC11187150

265. Yu Z. Guo J. Meng T. Ge L. Liu L. Wang H. Yang X. Bcl-XL DNAzymes Promote Radiosensitivity and Chemosensitivity in Colorectal Cancer Cells via Enhancing Apoptosis BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2022 23 13 10.1186/s40360-022-00553-x 35123593 PMC8817578

266. Cheng J. Qian D. Ding X. Song T. Cai M. Xie D. Wang Y. Zhao J. Liu Z. Wu Z. High PGAM5 Expression Induces Chemoresistance by Enhancing Bcl-XL-Mediated Anti-Apoptotic Signaling and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Cell Death Dis. 2018 9 991 10.1038/s41419-018-1017-8 30250224 PMC6155280

267. Chong S.J.F. Iskandar K. Lai J.X.H. Qu J. Raman D. Valentin R. Herbaux C. Collins M. Low I.C.C. Loh T. Serine-70 Phosphorylated Bcl-2 Prevents Oxidative Stress-Induced DNA Damage by Modulating the Mitochondrial Redox Metabolism Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 48 12727 12745 10.1093/nar/gkaa1110 33245769 PMC7736805

268. Chong S.J.F. Lai J.X.H. Qu J. Hirpara J. Kang J. Swaminathan K. Loh T. Kumar A. Vali S. Abbasi T. A Feedforward Relationship between Active Rac1 and Phosphorylated Bcl-2 Is Critical for Sustaining Bcl-2 Phosphorylation and Promoting Cancer Progression Cancer Lett. 2019 457 151 167 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.05.009 31103719

269. Chen H. Li Y. Li Y. Chen Z. Xie L. Li W. Zhu Y. Xue H. Koeffler H.P. Wu W. PARK2 Promotes Mitochondrial Pathway of Apoptosis and Antimicrotubule Drugs Chemosensitivity via Degradation of Phospho-BCL-2 Theranostics 2020 10 9984 10000 10.7150/thno.47044 32929329 PMC7481404

270. Li Y. Zhang B. Xiang L. Xia S. Kucuk O. Deng X. Boise L.H. Dong J.-T. TGF-β Causes Docetaxel Resistance in Prostate Cancer via the Induction of Bcl-2 by Acetylated KLF5 and Protein Stabilization Theranostics 2020 10 7656 7670 10.7150/thno.44567 32685011 PMC7359077

271. Suleimenov M. Bekbayev S. Ten M. Suleimenova N. Tlegenova M. Nurmagambetova A. Kauanova S. Vorobjev I. Bcl-XL Activity Influences Outcome of the Mitotic Arrest Front. Pharmacol. 2022 13 933112 10.3389/fphar.2022.933112 36188556 PMC9520339

272. Yu C.Y. Yeung T.K. Fu W.K. Poon R.Y.C. BCL-XL Regulates the Timing of Mitotic Apoptosis Independently of BCL2 and MCL1 Compensation Cell Death Dis. 2024 15 2 10.1038/s41419-023-06404-9 38172496 PMC10764939

273. Nanjo S. Wu W. Karachaliou N. Blakely C.M. Suzuki J. Chou Y.-T. Ali S.M. Kerr D.L. Olivas V.R. Shue J. Deficiency of the Splicing Factor RBM10 Limits EGFR Inhibitor Response in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer J. Clin. Investig. 2022 132 e145099 10.1172/JCI145099 35579943 PMC9246391

274. Lv Y. Zhang W. Zhao J. Sun B. Qi Y. Ji H. Chen C. Zhang J. Sheng J. Wang T. SRSF1 Inhibits Autophagy through Regulating Bcl-x Splicing and Interacting with PIK3C3 in Lung Cancer Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021 6 108 10.1038/s41392-021-00495-6 33664238 PMC7933324

275. Zhang J. Wang Y. Li S. Fang L. Wang X. Li J. Zhang H. Huang B. Xu Y. Yang W. Correction of Bcl -x Splicing Improves Responses to Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Cells and Mouse Models Br. J. Haematol. 2020 189 1141 1150 10.1111/bjh.16472 32189339

276. Zhang J. Liao Z.-H. Xu Y.-M. Li S.-Q. Zhong F.-M. Zhang L. Yao F.-Y. Bai Q. Yao L.-H. Huang B. The Role of METTL14 in the Progression of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Hematology 2025 30 2535819 10.1080/16078454.2025.2535819 40760738

277. Aird D. Teng T. Huang C.-L. Pazolli E. Banka D. Cheung-Ong K. Eifert C. Furman C. Wu Z.J. Seiler M. Sensitivity to Splicing Modulation of BCL2 Family Genes Defines Cancer Therapeutic Strategies for Splicing Modulators Nat. Commun. 2019 10 137 10.1038/s41467-018-08150-5 30635584 PMC6329755

278. Iyer R. Ding L. Batchu R.B. Naugler S. Shammas M.A. Munshi N.C. Antisense P53 Transduction Leads to Overexpression of Bcl-2 and Dexamethasone Resistance in Multiple Myeloma Leuk. Res. 2003 27 73 78 10.1016/S0145-2126(02)00064-4 12479855

279. Wilson K.S. Sehn L.H. Berry B. Chhanabhai M. Fitzgerald C.A. Gill K.K. Klasa R. Skinnider B. Sutherland J. Connors J.M. CHOP-R Therapy Overcomes the Adverse Prognostic Influence of BCL-2 Expression in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Leuk. Lymphoma 2007 48 1102 1109 10.1080/10428190701344881 17577773

280. Tu Y. Renner S. Xu F. Fleishman A. Taylor J. Weisz J. Vescio R. Rettig M. Berenson J. Krajewski S. BCL-X Expression in Multiple Myeloma: Possible Indicator of Chemoresistance Cancer Res. 1998 58 256 262 9443402

281. Wang C. Zhu X. Li A. Yang S. Qiao R. Zhang J. S100A16 Regulated by Snail Promotes the Chemoresistance of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer through the AKT/Bcl-2 Pathway Cancer Manag. Res. 2019 11 2449 2456 10.2147/CMAR.S196450 31118765 PMC6498975

282. Chen Y. Jacamo R. Konopleva M. Garzon R. Croce C. Andreeff M. CXCR4 Downregulation of Let-7a Drives Chemoresistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia J. Clin. Investig. 2013 123 2395 2407 10.1172/JCI66553 23676502 PMC3668829

283. Kremer K.N. Peterson K.L. Schneider P.A. Meng X.W. Dai H. Hess A.D. Smith B.D. Rodriguez-Ramirez C. Karp J.E. Kaufmann S.H. CXCR4 Chemokine Receptor Signaling Induces Apoptosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells via Regulation of the Bcl-2 Family Members Bcl-XL, Noxa, and Bak J. Biol. Chem. 2013 288 22899 22914 10.1074/jbc.M113.449926 23798675 PMC3743469

284. Sellin M. Mack R. Rhodes M.C. Zhang L. Berg S. Joshi K. Liu S. Wei W. Peter Breslin S.J. Larsen P. Molecular Mechanisms by Which Splice Modulator GEX1A Inhibits Leukaemia Development and Progression Br. J. Cancer 2022 127 223 236 10.1038/s41416-022-01796-5 35422078 PMC9296642

285. Nelson D.M. Joseph B. Hillion J. Segal J. Karp J.E. Resar L.M.S. Flavopiridol Induces BCL-2 Expression and Represses Oncogenic Transcription Factors in Leukemic Blasts from Adults with Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Leuk. Lymphoma 2011 52 1999 2006 10.3109/10428194.2011.591012 21728742 PMC3214625

286. Dong J. Park S.Y. Nguyen N. Ezhilarasan R. Martinez-Ledesma E. Wu S. Henry V. Piao Y. Tiao N. Brunell D. The Polo-like Kinase 1 Inhibitor Volasertib Synergistically Increases Radiation Efficacy in Glioma Stem Cells Oncotarget 2018 9 10497 10509 10.18632/oncotarget.24041 29535822 PMC5828226

287. Castellanet O. Ahmad F. Vinik Y. Mills G.B. Habermann B. Borg J.-P. Lev S. Lamballe F. Maina F. BCL-XL Blockage in TNBC Models Confers Vulnerability to Inhibition of Specific Cell Cycle Regulators Theranostics 2021 11 9180 9197 10.7150/thno.60503 34646365 PMC8490507

288. Ramkumar K. Tanimoto A. Della Corte C.M. Stewart C.A. Wang Q. Shen L. Cardnell R.J. Wang J. Polanska U.M. Andersen C. Targeting BCL2 Overcomes Resistance and Augments Response to Aurora Kinase B Inhibition by AZD2811 in Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2023 29 3237 3249 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0375 37289191 PMC10527398

289. Zhang J. Zhang S. Shi Q. Allen T.D. You F. Yang D. The Anti-Apoptotic Proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL Suppress Beclin 1/Atg6-Mediated Lethal Autophagy in Polyploid Cells Exp. Cell Res. 2020 394 112112 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112112 32473226

290. Frederick D.T. Salas Fragomeni R.A. Schalck A. Ferreiro-Neira I. Hoff T. Cooper Z.A. Haq R. Panka D.J. Kwong L.N. Davies M.A. Clinical Profiling of BCL-2 Family Members in the Setting of BRAF Inhibition Offers a Rationale for Targeting De Novo Resistance Using BH3 Mimetics PLoS ONE 2014 9 e101286 10.1371/journal.pone.0101286 24983357 PMC4077767

291. Luanpitpong S. Janan M. Yosudjai J. Poohadsuan J. Chanvorachote P. Issaragrisil S. Bcl-2 Family Members Bcl-XL and Bax Cooperatively Contribute to Bortezomib Resistance in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022 23 14474 10.3390/ijms232214474 36430955 PMC9695253

292. Panda P.K. Paschoalini Mafra A.C. Bastos A.C.S. Cao L. Serra Bonet M. Brashears C.B. Chen E.Y. Benedict-Hamilton H.M. Ehrhardt W. Bomalaski J. BCL-XL Protects ASS1-Deficient Cancers from Arginine Starvation–Induced Apoptosis Clin. Cancer Res. 2025 31 1333 1345 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2548 39898973 PMC11964295

293. Sangfelt O. Österborg A. Grandér D. Anderbring E. Öst Å. Mellstedt H. Einhorn S. Response to Interferon Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Correlates with Expression of the Bcl-2 Oncoprotein Int. J. Cancer 1995 63 190 192 10.1002/ijc.2910630207 7591202

294. Larsen M.S. Bjerre K. Giobbie-Hurder A. Lænkholm A.-V. Henriksen K.L. Ejlertsen B. Lykkesfeldt A.E. Rasmussen B.B. Prognostic Value of Bcl-2 in Two Independent Populations of Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Acta Oncol. 2012 51 781 789 10.3109/0284186X.2011.653009 22462654 PMC3744229

295. Wu M.-Z. Fu T. Chen J.-X. Lin Y.-Y. Yang J.-E. Zhuang S.-M. LncRNA GOLGA2P10 Is Induced by PERK/ATF4/CHOP Signaling and Protects Tumor Cells from ER Stress-Induced Apoptosis by Regulating Bcl-2 Family Members Cell Death Dis. 2020 11 276 10.1038/s41419-020-2469-1 32332695 PMC7181651

296. Wang H. Ren R. Yang Z. Cai J. Du S. Shen X. The COL11A1/Akt/CREB Signaling Axis Enables Mitochondrial-Mediated Apoptotic Evasion to Promote Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer Cells through Modulating BAX/BCL-2 Function J. Cancer 2021 12 1406 1420 10.7150/jca.47032 33531986 PMC7847647

297. Wang J. Feng W. Yuan Z. Weber J.D. Zhang Y. DHX33 Interacts with AP-2 β To Regulate Bcl-2 Gene Expression and Promote Cancer Cell Survival Mol. Cell. Biol. 2019 39 e00017-19 10.1128/MCB.00017-19 31182639 PMC6692123

298. Han Y. Zhang X. Guan M. Huo C. Yu C. Hu B. Cai J. RASSF4 Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Increases Drug Sensitivity in Colorectal Cancer through YAP/Bcl-2 Pathway J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2022 26 3538 3547 10.1111/jcmm.17395 35611809 PMC9189339

299. Sattlermc M. Griffin J.D. Molecular Mechanisms of Transformation by the BCR-ABL Oncogene Semin. Hematol. 2003 40 4 10 10.1053/shem.2003.50034 12783368

300. Horita M. Andreu E.J. Benito A. Arbona C. Sanz C. Benet I. Prosper F. Fernandez-Luna J.L. Blockade of the Bcr-Abl Kinase Activity Induces Apoptosis of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Cells by Suppressing Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5–Dependent Expression of Bcl-XL J. Exp. Med. 2000 191 977 984 10.1084/jem.191.6.977 10727459 PMC2193112

301. Håkansson A. Gustafsson B. Abdiu A. Krysander L. Håkansson L. Bcl-2 Expression in Metastatic Malignant Melanoma. Importance for the Therapeutic Efficacy of Biochemotherapy Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2003 52 249 254 10.1007/s00262-003-0373-z 12669250 PMC11033004

302. von Minckwitz G. Sinn H.-P. Raab G. Loibl S. Blohmer J.-U. Eidtmann H. Hilfrich J. Merkle E. Jackisch C. Costa S.D. Clinical Response after Two Cycles Compared to HER2, Ki-67, P53, and Bcl-2 in Independently Predicting a Pathological Complete Response after Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients with Operable Carcinoma of the Breast Breast Cancer Res. 2008 10 R30 10.1186/bcr1989 18380893 PMC2397529

303. Liu Y. Ma X. Wu X. Hou X. Jin W. Fu L. Xun X. Yu Y. Shen Z. Zanubrutinib Is Effective in Non-Germinal-Center B-Cell-like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Mutated CD79B, High TCL1A Expression, or over- Expressed MYC/BCL-2 Leuk. Lymphoma 2024 65 1079 1089 10.1080/10428194.2024.2343779 38775302

304. Kyndi M. Sørensen F.B. Knudsen H. Alsner J. Overgaard M. Nielsen H.M. Overgaard J. Impact of BCL2 and P53 on Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Response in High-Risk Breast Cancer. A Subgroup Analysis of DBCG82 B&C Acta Oncol. 2008 47 608 617 10.1080/02841860802050746 18465329

305. Buffa F.M. Bentzen S.M. Daley F.M. Dische S. Saunders M.I. Richman P.I. Wilson G.D. Molecular Marker Profiles Predict Locoregional Control of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Randomized Trial of Continuous Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy Clin. Cancer Res. 2004 10 3745 3754 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0248 15173081

306. Pollack A. Cowen D. Troncoso P. Zagars G.K. von Eschenbach A.C. Meistrich M.L. McDonnell T. Molecular Markers of Outcome after Radiotherapy in Patients with Prostate Carcinoma Cancer 2003 97 1630 1638 10.1002/cncr.11230 12655519

307. Sun D. Mu Y. Piao H. MicroRNA-153-3p Enhances Cell Radiosensitivity by Targeting BCL2 in Human Glioma Biol. Res. 2018 51 56 10.1186/s40659-018-0203-6 30537994 PMC6288870

308. Jackson M.R. Ashton M. Koessinger A.L. Dick C. Verheij M. Chalmers A.J. Mesothelioma Cells Depend on the Antiapoptotic Protein Bcl-XL for Survival and Are Sensitized to Ionizing Radiation by BH3-Mimetics Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2020 106 867 877 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.029 31786278

309. Nix P. Cawkwell L. Patmore H. Greenman J. Stafford N. Bcl-2 Expression Predicts Radiotherapy Failure in Laryngeal Cancer Br. J. Cancer 2005 92 2185 2189 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602647 15928664 PMC2361818

310. Dong X. Li X. Gan Y. Ding J. Wei B. Zhou L. Cui W. Li W. TRAF4-Mediated Ubiquitination-Dependent Activation of JNK/Bcl-XL Drives Radioresistance Cell Death Dis. 2023 14 102 10.1038/s41419-023-05637-y 36765039 PMC9918491

311. Streffer J.R. Rimner A. Rieger J. Naumann U. Rodemann H.-P. Weller M. BCL-2 Family Proteins Modulate Radiosensitivity in Human Malignant Glioma Cells J. Neurooncol. 2002 56 43 49 10.1023/A:1014448721327 11949826

312. Lee J.-U. Hosotani R. Wada M. Doi R. Kosiba T. Fujimoto K. Miyamoto Y. Tsuji S. Nakajima S. Nishimura Y. Role of Bcl-2 Family Proteins (Bax, Bcl-2 and Bcl-X) on Cellular Susceptibility to Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer Cells Eur. J. Cancer 1999 35 1374 1380 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00134-3 10658530

313. SZOSTAK M.J. KAUR P. AMIN P. JACOBS S.C. KYPRIANOU N. APOPTOSIS AND BCL-2 EXPRESSION IN PROSTATE CANCER J. Urol. 2001 165 2126 2130 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66306-9 11371940

314. Khor L.Y. Moughan J. Al-Saleem T. Hammond E.H. Venkatesan V. Rosenthal S.A. Ritter M.A. Sandler H.M. Hanks G.E. Shipley W.U. Bcl-2 and Bax Expression Predict Prostate Cancer Outcome in Men Treated with Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92-02 Clin. Cancer Res. 2007 13 3585 3590 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2972 17575222 PMC2763095

315. Vergis R. Corbishley C.M. Thomas K. Horwich A. Huddart R. Khoo V. Eeles R. Sydes M.R. Cooper C.S. Dearnaley D. Expression of Bcl-2, P53, and MDM2 in Localized Prostate Cancer with Respect to the Outcome of Radical Radiotherapy Dose Escalation Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2010 78 35 41 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1728 20092961

316. Oing C. Tennstedt P. Simon R. Volquardsen J. Borgmann K. Bokemeyer C. Petersen C. Dikomey E. Rothkamm K. Mansour W.Y. BCL2-Overexpressing Prostate Cancer Cells Rely on PARP1-Dependent End-Joining and Are Sensitive to Combined PARP Inhibitor and Radiation Therapy Cancer Lett. 2018 423 60 70 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.03.007 29526801

317. Bharti V. Watkins R. Kumar A. Shattuck-Brandt R.L. Mossing A. Mittra A. Shen C. Tsung A. Davies A.E. Hanel W. BCL-XL Inhibition Potentiates Cancer Therapies by Redirecting the Outcome of P53 Activation from Senescence to Apoptosis Cell Rep. 2022 41 111826 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111826 36543138 PMC10030045

318. Alcon C. Kovatcheva M. Morales-Sánchez P. López-Polo V. Torres T. Puig S. Lu A. Samitier J. Enrich C. Serrano M. HRK Downregulation and Augmented BCL-XL Binding to BAK Confer Apoptotic Protection to Therapy-Induced Senescent Melanoma Cells Cell Death Differ. 2025 32 646 656 10.1038/s41418-024-01417-z 39627361 PMC11982230

319. Gayle S.S. Sahni J.M. Webb B.M. Weber-Bonk K.L. Shively M.S. Spina R. Bar E.E. Summers M.K. Keri R.A. Targeting BCL-XL Improves the Efficacy of Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Protein Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Eliciting the Death of Senescent Cells J. Biol. Chem. 2019 294 875 886 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004712 30482844 PMC6341404

320. Sela Y. Li J. Maheswaran S. Norgard R. Yuan S. Hubbi M. Doepner M. Xu J.P. Ho E.S. Mesaros C. Bcl-XL Enforces a Slow-Cycling State Necessary for Survival in the Nutrient-Deprived Microenvironment of Pancreatic Cancer Cancer Res. 2022 82 1890 1908 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-0431 35315913 PMC9117449

321. Ryder C. McColl K. Zhong F. Distelhorst C.W. Acidosis Promotes Bcl-2 Family-Mediated Evasion of Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem. 2012 287 27863 27875 10.1074/jbc.M112.384685 22685289 PMC3431637

322. Ploumaki I. Triantafyllou E. Koumprentziotis I.-A. Karampinos K. Drougkas K. Karavolias I. Trontzas I. Kotteas E.A. Bcl-2 Pathway Inhibition in Solid Tumors: A Review of Clinical Trials Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2023 25 1554 1578 10.1007/s12094-022-03070-9 36639602 PMC10203027

323. Wilson W.H. O’Connor O.A. Czuczman M.S. LaCasce A.S. Gerecitano J.F. Leonard J.P. Tulpule A. Dunleavy K. Xiong H. Chiu Y.-L. Navitoclax, a Targeted High-Affinity Inhibitor of BCL-2, in Lymphoid Malignancies: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Antitumour Activity Lancet Oncol. 2010 11 1149 1159 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70261-8 21094089 PMC3025495

324. Gandhi L. Camidge D.R. Ribeiro de Oliveira M. Bonomi P. Gandara D. Khaira D. Hann C.L. McKeegan E.M. Litvinovich E. Hemken P.M. Phase I Study of Navitoclax (ABT-263), a Novel Bcl-2 Family Inhibitor, in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol. 2011 29 909 916 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6208 21282543 PMC4668282

325. Roberts A.W. Seymour J.F. Brown J.R. Wierda W.G. Kipps T.J. Khaw S.L. Carney D.A. He S.Z. Huang D.C.S. Xiong H. Substantial Susceptibility of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia to BCL2 Inhibition: Results of a Phase I Study of Navitoclax in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Disease J. Clin. Oncol. 2012 30 488 496 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7898 22184378 PMC4979082

326. de Vos S. Leonard J.P. Friedberg J.W. Zain J. Dunleavy K. Humerickhouse R. Hayslip J. Pesko J. Wilson W.H. Safety and Efficacy of Navitoclax, a BCL-2 and BCL-X L Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoid Malignancies: Results from a Phase 2a Study Leuk. Lymphoma 2021 62 810 818 10.1080/10428194.2020.1845332 33236943 PMC9257998

327. Rudin C.M. Hann C.L. Garon E.B. Ribeiro de Oliveira M. Bonomi P.D. Camidge D.R. Chu Q. Giaccone G. Khaira D. Ramalingam S.S. Phase II Study of Single-Agent Navitoclax (ABT-263) and Biomarker Correlates in Patients with Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2012 18 3163 3169 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3090 22496272 PMC3715059

328. Joly F. Fabbro M. Follana P. Lequesne J. Medioni J. Lesoin A. Frenel J.-S. Abadie-Lacourtoisie S. Floquet A. Gladieff L. A Phase II Study of Navitoclax (ABT-263) as Single Agent in Women Heavily Pretreated for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: The MONAVI—GINECO Study Gynecol. Oncol. 2022 165 30 39 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.021 35123771

329. Cleary J.M. Lima C.M.S.R. Hurwitz H.I. Montero A.J. Franklin C. Yang J. Graham A. Busman T. Mabry M. Holen K. A Phase I Clinical Trial of Navitoclax, a Targeted High-Affinity Bcl-2 Family Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine in Patients with Solid Tumors Investig. New Drugs 2014 32 937 945 10.1007/s10637-014-0110-9 24916770

330. Puglisi M. Molife L.R. de Jonge M.J. Khan K.H. van Doorn L. Forster M.D. Blanco M. Gutierrez M. Franklin C. Busman T. A Phase I Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Navitoclax Plus Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Futur. Oncol. 2021 17 2747 2758 10.2217/fon-2021-0140 33849298

331. Corcoran R.B. Do K.T. Kim J.E. Cleary J.M. Parikh A.R. Yeku O.O. Xiong N. Weekes C.D. Veneris J. Ahronian L.G. Phase I/II Study of Combined BCL-XL and MEK Inhibition with Navitoclax and Trametinib in KRAS or NRAS Mutant Advanced Solid Tumors Clin. Cancer Res. 2024 30 1739 1749 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3135 38456660 PMC11061595

332. Tolcher A.W. LoRusso P. Arzt J. Busman T.A. Lian G. Rudersdorf N.S. Vanderwal C.A. Kirschbrown W. Holen K.D. Rosen L.S. Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Navitoclax (ABT-263) in Combination with Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2015 76 1025 1032 10.1007/s00280-015-2883-8 26420235

333. Vlahovic G. Karantza V. Wang D. Cosgrove D. Rudersdorf N. Yang J. Xiong H. Busman T. Mabry M. A Phase I Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of ABT-263 in Combination with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Patients with Solid Tumors Investig. New Drugs 2014 32 976 984 10.1007/s10637-014-0116-3 24894650

334. Tolcher A.W. LoRusso P. Arzt J. Busman T.A. Lian G. Rudersdorf N.S. Vanderwal C.A. Waring J.F. Yang J. Holen K.D. Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Navitoclax (ABT-263) in Combination with Irinotecan: Results of an Open-Label, Phase 1 Study Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2015 76 1041 1049 10.1007/s00280-015-2882-9 26429709

335. Bertino E.M. Gentzler R.D. Clifford S. Kolesar J. Muzikansky A. Haura E.B. Piotrowska Z. Camidge D.R. Stinchcombe T.E. Hann C. Phase IB Study of Osimertinib in Combination with Navitoclax in EGFR -Mutant NSCLC Following Resistance to Initial EGFR Therapy (ETCTN 9903) Clin. Cancer Res. 2021 27 1604 1611 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4084 33376097 PMC7976451

336. Scott S.C. Farago A. Lai W.V. Zahurak M. Rudek M.A. Murray J. Carducci M.A. Uziel T. Takebe N. Gore S.D. A Phase 1 Study of the Combination of BH3-Mimetic, Navitoclax, and MTORC1/2 Inhibitor, Vistusertib, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2025 95 37 10.1007/s00280-025-04760-1 39998620 PMC12235654

337. Emiloju O.E. Yin J. Koubek E. Reid J.M. Borad M.J. Lou Y. Seetharam M. Edelman M.J. Sausville E.A. Jiang Y. Phase 1 Trial of Navitoclax and Sorafenib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Expansion Cohort Investig. New Drugs 2024 42 127 135 10.1007/s10637-024-01420-8 38270822

338. Harrison C.N. Garcia J.S. Somervaille T.C.P. Foran J.M. Verstovsek S. Jamieson C. Mesa R. Ritchie E.K. Tantravahi S.K. Vachhani P. Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients with Myelofibrosis with Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy J. Clin. Oncol. 2022 40 1671 1680 10.1200/JCO.21.02188 35180010 PMC9113204

339. Roberts A.W. Advani R.H. Kahl B.S. Persky D. Sweetenham J.W. Carney D.A. Yang J. Busman T.B. Enschede S.H. Humerickhouse R.A. Phase 1 Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumour Activity of the BCL2 Inhibitor Navitoclax in Combination with Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD20 + Lymphoid Malignancies Br. J. Haematol. 2015 170 669 678 10.1111/bjh.13487 25942994 PMC4534314

340. Kipps T.J. Eradat H. Grosicki S. Catalano J. Cosolo W. Dyagil I.S. Yalamanchili S. Chai A. Sahasranaman S. Punnoose E. A Phase 2 Study of the BH3 Mimetic BCL2 Inhibitor Navitoclax (ABT-263) with or without Rituximab, in Previously Untreated B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Leuk. Lymphoma 2015 56 2826 2833 10.3109/10428194.2015.1030638 25797560 PMC4643417

341. Pullarkat V.A. Lacayo N.J. Jabbour E. Rubnitz J.E. Bajel A. Laetsch T.W. Leonard J. Colace S.I. Khaw S.L. Fleming S.A. Venetoclax and Navitoclax in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma Cancer Discov. 2021 11 1440 1453 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1465 33593877 PMC9533326

342. Schimmer A.D. O’Brien S. Kantarjian H. Brandwein J. Cheson B.D. Minden M.D. Yee K. Ravandi F. Giles F. Schuh A. A Phase I Study of the Pan Bcl-2 Family Inhibitor Obatoclax Mesylate in Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies Clin. Cancer Res. 2008 14 8295 8301 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0999 19088047

343. O’Brien S.M. Claxton D.F. Crump M. Faderl S. Kipps T. Keating M.J. Viallet J. Cheson B.D. Phase I Study of Obatoclax Mesylate (GX15-070), a Small Molecule Pan–Bcl-2 Family Antagonist, in Patients with Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Blood 2009 113 299 305 10.1182/blood-2008-02-137943 18931344 PMC4968372

344. Hwang J.J. Kuruvilla J. Mendelson D. Pishvaian M.J. Deeken J.F. Siu L.L. Berger M.S. Viallet J. Marshall J.L. Phase I Dose Finding Studies of Obatoclax (GX15-070), a Small Molecule Pan-BCL-2 Family Antagonist, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma Clin. Cancer Res. 2010 16 4038 4045 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0822 20538761 PMC3703245

345. Schimmer A.D. Raza A. Carter T.H. Claxton D. Erba H. DeAngelo D.J. Tallman M.S. Goard C. Borthakur G. A Multicenter Phase I/II Study of Obatoclax Mesylate Administered as a 3- or 24-Hour Infusion in Older Patients with Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia PLoS ONE 2014 9 e108694 10.1371/journal.pone.0108694 25285531 PMC4186779

346. Arellano M.L. Borthakur G. Berger M. Luer J. Raza A. A Phase II, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Obatoclax Mesylate in Patients with Previously Untreated Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Anemia or Thrombocytopenia Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014 14 534 539 10.1016/j.clml.2014.04.007 25052051

347. Parikh S.A. Kantarjian H. Schimmer A. Walsh W. Asatiani E. El-Shami K. Winton E. Verstovsek S. Phase II Study of Obatoclax Mesylate (GX15-070), a Small-Molecule BCL-2 Family Antagonist, for Patients with Myelofibrosis Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2010 10 285 289 10.3816/CLML.2010.n.059 20709666

348. Oki Y. Copeland A. Hagemeister F. Fayad L.E. Fanale M. Romaguera J. Younes A. Experience with Obatoclax Mesylate (GX15-070), a Small Molecule Pan–Bcl-2 Family Antagonist in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Blood 2012 119 2171 2172 10.1182/blood-2011-11-391037 22383790

349. Chiappori A.A. Schreeder M.T. Moezi M.M. Stephenson J.J. Blakely J. Salgia R. Chu Q.S. Ross H.J. Subramaniam D.S. Schnyder J. A Phase I Trial of Pan-Bcl-2 Antagonist Obatoclax Administered as a 3-h or a 24-h Infusion in Combination with Carboplatin and Etoposide in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Br. J. Cancer 2012 106 839 845 10.1038/bjc.2012.21 22333598 PMC3305978

350. Langer C.J. Albert I. Ross H.J. Kovacs P. Blakely L.J. Pajkos G. Somfay A. Zatloukal P. Kazarnowicz A. Moezi M.M. Randomized Phase II Study of Carboplatin and Etoposide with or without Obatoclax Mesylate in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Lung Cancer 2014 85 420 428 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.05.003 24997137

351. Brown J.R. Tesar B. Yu L. Werner L. Takebe N. Mikler E. Reynolds H.M. Thompson C. Fisher D.C. Neuberg D. Obatoclax in Combination with Fludarabine and Rituximab Is Well-Tolerated and Shows Promising Clinical Activity in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Leuk. Lymphoma 2015 56 3336 3342 10.3109/10428194.2015.1048441 25971907

352. Paik P.K. Rudin C.M. Brown A. Rizvi N.A. Takebe N. Travis W. James L. Ginsberg M.S. Juergens R. Markus S. A Phase I Study of Obatoclax Mesylate, a Bcl-2 Antagonist, plus Topotecan in Solid Tumor Malignancies Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2010 66 1079 1085 10.1007/s00280-010-1265-5 20165849 PMC2945625

353. Paik P.K. Rudin C.M. Pietanza M.C. Brown A. Rizvi N.A. Takebe N. Travis W. James L. Ginsberg M.S. Juergens R. A Phase II Study of Obatoclax Mesylate, a Bcl-2 Antagonist, plus Topotecan in Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer Lung Cancer 2011 74 481 485 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.05.005 21620511 PMC3715068

354. Goy A. Hernandez-Ilzaliturri F.J. Kahl B. Ford P. Protomastro E. Berger M. A Phase I/II Study of the Pan Bcl-2 Inhibitor Obatoclax Mesylate plus Bortezomib for Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Leuk. Lymphoma 2014 55 2761 2768 10.3109/10428194.2014.907891 24679008 PMC4349217

355. Chiappori A. Williams C. Northfelt D.W. Adams J.W. Malik S. Edelman M.J. Rosen P. Van Echo D.A. Berger M.S. Haura E.B. Obatoclax Mesylate, a Pan–Bcl-2 Inhibitor, in Combination with Docetaxel in a Phase 1/2 Trial in Relapsed Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014 9 121 125 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000027 24346101 PMC4666503

356. Van Poznak C. Seidman A.D. Reidenberg M.M. Moasser M.M. Sklarin N. Van Zee K. Borgen P. Gollub M. Bacotti D. Yao T.-J. Oral Gossypol in the Treatment of Patients with Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase I/II Clinical Trial Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2001 66 239 248 10.1023/A:1010686204736 11510695

357. Liu G. Kelly W.K. Wilding G. Leopold L. Brill K. Somer B. An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I/II Study of Single-Agent AT-101 in Men with Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2009 15 3172 3176 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2985 19366825 PMC2921915

358. Stein M.N. Hussain M. Stadler W.M. Liu G. Tereshchenko I.V. Goodin S. Jeyamohan C. Kaufman H.L. Mehnert J. DiPaola R.S. A Phase II Study of AT-101 to Overcome Bcl-2–Mediated Resistance to Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Castration-Sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2016 14 22 27 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.010 26476589 PMC4698193

359. Fiveash J.B. Ye X. Peerboom D.M. Mikkelsen T. Chowdhary S. Rosenfeld M. Lesser G.J. Fisher J. Desideri S. Grossman S. Clinical Trials of R-(-)-Gossypol (AT-101) in Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma: NABTT 0602 and NABTT 0702 PLoS ONE 2024 19 e0291128 10.1371/journal.pone.0291128 38285688 PMC10824421

360. Baggstrom M.Q. Qi Y. Koczywas M. Argiris A. Johnson E.A. Millward M.J. Murphy S.C. Erlichman C. Rudin C.M. Govindan R. A Phase II Study of AT-101 (Gossypol) in Chemotherapy-Sensitive Recurrent Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011 6 1757 1760 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822e2941 21918390 PMC3180914

361. Xie H. Yin J. Shah M.H. Menefee M.E. Bible K.C. Reidy-Lagunes D. Kane M.A. Quinn D.I. Gandara D.R. Erlichman C. A Phase II Study of the Orally Administered Negative Enantiomer of Gossypol (AT-101), a BH3 Mimetic, in Patients with Advanced Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma Investig. New Drugs 2019 37 755 762 10.1007/s10637-019-00797-1 31172443 PMC7515770

362. Stein M.N. Goodin S. Gounder M. Gibbon D. Moss R. Portal D. Lindquist D. Zhao Y. Takebe N. Tan A. A Phase I Study of AT-101, a BH3 Mimetic, in Combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Solid Tumors Investig. New Drugs 2020 38 855 865 10.1007/s10637-019-00807-2 31388792

363. Schelman W.R. Mohammed T.A. Traynor A.M. Kolesar J.M. Marnocha R.M. Eickhoff J. Keppen M. Alberti D.B. Wilding G. Takebe N. A Phase I Study of AT-101 with Cisplatin and Etoposide in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors with an Expanded Cohort in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Investig. New Drugs 2014 32 295 302 10.1007/s10637-013-9999-7 23860642 PMC3895103

364. Song S. Chen Q. Li Y. Lei G. Scott A. Huo L. Li C.Y. Estrella J.S. Correa A. Pizzi M.P. Targeting Cancer Stem Cells with a Pan-BCL-2 Inhibitor in Preclinical and Clinical Settings in Patients with Gastroesophageal Carcinoma Gut 2021 70 2238 2248 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321175 33487592 PMC9720890

365. Suk Heist R. Fain J. Chinnasami B. Khan W. Molina J.R. Sequist L.V. Temel J.S. Fidias P. Brainerd V. Leopold L. Phase I/II Study of AT-101 with Topotecan in Relapsed and Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010 5 1637 1643 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e8f4dc 20808253

366. Swiecicki P.L. Bellile E. Sacco A.G. Pearson A.T. Taylor J.M.G. Jackson T.L. Chepeha D.B. Spector M.E. Shuman A. Malloy K. A Phase II Trial of the BCL-2 Homolog Domain 3 Mimetic AT-101 in Combination with Docetaxel for Recurrent, Locally Advanced, or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer Investig. New Drugs 2016 34 481 489 10.1007/s10637-016-0364-5 27225873 PMC5036856

367. Ready N. Karaseva N.A. Orlov S.V. Luft A.V. Popovych O. Holmlund J.T. Wood B.A. Leopold L. Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 2 Study of the Proapoptotic Agent AT-101 Plus Docetaxel, in Second-Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011 6 781 785 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820a0ea6 21289522

368. Wang Y. Li X. Zhang L. Li M. Dai N. Luo H. Shan J. Yang X. Xu M. Feng Y. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of B-Cell Lymphoma 2 Homology 3 Mimetic Gossypol Combined with Docetaxel and Cisplatin for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with High Expression of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease 1 Investig. New Drugs 2020 38 1862 1871 10.1007/s10637-020-00927-0 32529467 PMC7575477

369. Swiecicki P.L. Bellile E. Casper K. Chinn S.B. Dragovic A.F. Jolly S. Kupfer R. Malloy K.M. Mierzwa M.L. Shuman A.G. Randomized Trial of Laryngeal Organ Preservation Evaluating Two Cycles of Induction Chemotherapy with Platinum, Docetaxel, and a Novel Bcl-xLInhibitor Head. Neck 2022 44 1509 1519 10.1002/hed.27043 35416374 PMC10681682

370. Sonpavde G. Matveev V. Burke J.M. Caton J.R. Fleming M.T. Hutson T.E. Galsky M.D. Berry W.R. Karlov P. Holmlund J.T. Randomized Phase II Trial of Docetaxel plus Prednisone in Combination with Placebo or AT-101, an Oral Small Molecule Bcl-2 Family Antagonist, as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Ann. Oncol. 2012 23 1803 1808 10.1093/annonc/mdr555 22112969

371. Lakhani N.J. Rasco D. Wang H. Men L. Liang E. Fu T. Collins M.C. Min P. Yin Y. Davids M.S. First-in-Human Study with Preclinical Data of BCL-2/BCL-XL Inhibitor Pelcitoclax in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Clin. Cancer Res. 2024 30 506 521 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1525 37971712

372. Li Y. McIntosh J. Jiang V. Yan F. Vargas J. Che Y. Wang W. Li C.-F. Fei Y. Lee C. BCL-2/BCL-XL Dual Inhibition Triggers Gasdermin D-Mediated Pyroptosis in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cancer Lett. 2025 632 217961 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217961 40754138

373. Judd A.S. Bawa B. Buck W.R. Tao Z.-F. Li Y. Mitten M.J. Bruncko M. Catron N. Doherty G. Durbin K.R. BCL-X L—Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugates Are Active in Preclinical Models and Mitigate on-Mechanism Toxicity of Small-Molecule Inhibitors Sci. Adv. 2024 10 eado7120 10.1126/sciadv.ado7120 39365864 PMC11451551

374. Patterson C.M. Balachander S.B. Grant I. Pop-Damkov P. Kelly B. McCoull W. Parker J. Giannis M. Hill K.J. Gibbons F.D. Design and Optimisation of Dendrimer-Conjugated Bcl-2/XL Inhibitor, AZD0466, with Improved Therapeutic Index for Cancer Therapy Commun. Biol. 2021 4 112 10.1038/s42003-020-01631-8 33495510 PMC7835349

375. Yecies D. Carlson N.E. Deng J. Letai A. Acquired Resistance to ABT-737 in Lymphoma Cells That up-Regulate MCL-1 and BFL-1 Blood 2010 115 3304 3313 10.1182/blood-2009-07-233304 20197552 PMC2858493

376. Mérino D. Khaw S.L. Glaser S.P. Anderson D.J. Belmont L.D. Wong C. Yue P. Robati M. Phipson B. Fairlie W.D. Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and Bcl-w Are Not Equivalent Targets of ABT-737 and Navitoclax (ABT-263) in Lymphoid and Leukemic Cells Blood 2012 119 5807 5816 10.1182/blood-2011-12-400929 22538851 PMC3382939

377. Liu Q. Osterlund E.J. Chi X. Pogmore J. Leber B. Andrews D.W. Bim Escapes Displacement by BH3-Mimetic Anti-Cancer Drugs by Double-Bolt Locking Both Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 Elife 2019 8 e37689 10.7554/eLife.37689 30860026 PMC6414199

378. Wesarg E. Hoffarth S. Wiewrodt R. Kröll M. Biesterfeld S. Huber C. Schuler M. Targeting BCL-2 Family Proteins to Overcome Drug Resistance in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Int. J. Cancer 2007 121 2387 2394 10.1002/ijc.22977 17688235

379. Pemmaraju N. Somervaille T.C.P. Palandri F. Harrison C. Komrokji R.S. Perkins A. Ayala Diaz R.M. Lavie D. Tomita A. Feng Y. Addition of Navitoclax to Ruxolitinib for Patients with Myelofibrosis with Progression or Suboptimal Response Blood Neoplasia 2025 2 100056 10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100056 40454409 PMC12082167

380. Pemmaraju N. Garcia J.S. Potluri J. Harb J.G. Sun Y. Jung P. Qin Q.Q. Tantravahi S.K. Verstovsek S. Harrison C. Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Treatment in Patients with Myelofibrosis (REFINE): A Post-Hoc Analysis of Molecular Biomarkers in a Phase 2 Study Lancet Haematol. 2022 9 e434 e444 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00116-8 35576960

381. Paulus A. Advani P. Laplant B.R. Akhtar S. Sher T. Rivera C.E. Foran J.M. Roy V. Colon-Otero G. Ailawadhi S. Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Lenalidomide in Combination with AT101 for the Treatment of Relapsed B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Blood 2015 126 5299 10.1182/blood.V126.23.5299.5299

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты