Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Treatment, and Risk Assessment.

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a medical condition that includes a state of excessive blood clotting, whereby various factors contribute to the development of a clot or thrombus within the blood vessels. This condition can manifest in different forms, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), superficial vein thrombosis, and splanchnic vein thrombosis, which is a less common site of VTE. 1 Jean-Baptiste Bouillaud is credited with having made initial assessment regarding the link between cancer and VTE. 2 Armand Trousseau expounded on this correlation in greater depth in his section titled “Phlegmasia alba dolens” within the published compilations of his lectures. 3 In the last 2 decades, substantial progress has been made in comprehending the process of therapy and prevention of thrombosis associated with cancer. 4 Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) refers to VTE (comprised of DVT and PE), arterial thrombosis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation that manifests in individuals diagnosed with cancer. This category of VTE primarily encompasses DVT affecting the upper or lower extremities, as well as PE. 5 Considering the high incidence, morbidity, and mortality rate of VTE in cancer patients, there is a substantial need for understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms behind this clinical entity. In that manner, this article discusses the incidence and risk factors, elaborates on the pathophysiological mechanisms of CAT in a variety of cancer categories, and describes the current state of therapy and CAT prevention guidelines.

The Incidence, Morbidity and Mortality of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

The occurrence of CAT varies according to the characteristics of the patient population, the length of the period of monitoring, and the technique used to identify and record thrombotic events. The presence of active cancer is associated with a 4- to 7-fold increase in the risk of developing CAT. Furthermore, cancer patients comprise between 20% and 30% of new cases of VTE in the overall population. 6 In total, 18% of patients in the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad Trombo Embolica registry, a large prospective cohort of VTE patients, had active cancer. 7 The incidence of VTE within the initial 6 months of cancer treatment is significantly elevated, ranging from 12 to 23 times greater compared with the general population. This risk is particularly heightened in patients undergoing chemotherapy or targeted therapy. 8 Furthermore, from 1997 to 2017, the overall prevalence of CAT has increased from 1.0% to 3.4%. This increase can be plausibly attributed to the improved prognosis among cancer patients and the heightened utilization of computed tomography scans, which has resulted in higher rates of incident PE diagnoses. 8 Also, VTE in cancer patients is associated with greater morbidity, which can lead to a decline in quality of life, treatment interruptions, and elevated mortality rates. 9 - 11 Thus, VTE represents the second most frequent cause of mortality in cancer patients, surpassed solely by the cancer itself. 12 A prospective cohort of 9754 participants in the Framingham Heart Study showed that CAT had a worse prognosis among VTE patients. 13 Similarly, findings from the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field (GARFIELD)-VTE registry indicated that among a group of 10 315 VTE patients from 419 centers and 28 countries, the total mortality rate was 9.7% within a 6-month period, with 54.3% of all fatalities being attributed to cancer. 14 In addition, the financial impact of VTE in individuals with cancer is significant, given that VTE is associated with elevated health care costs. 15 , 16 Furthermore, a quarter of individuals diagnosed with both cancer and VTE experience hospital readmission due to either bleeding or a relapse of VTE. 17

Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Risk Factors

Multiple risk factors, including patient-associated risk factors, cancer-associated risk factors, therapy-associated risk factors, and the presence of certain biomarkers, have been identified as contributing to the pathogenesis of CAT. 18 , 19 Patient-associated factors include older age, 20 ethnicity (eg, Hispanic and Asian cancer patients have a lower incidence of VTE complications during the first year compared with white and black patients), 21 history or family history of VTE, 22 - 25 functional status, smoking, parenteral nutrition requirements, concurrent conditions (eg, renal failure, respiratory disease, acute infection, and obesity), 26 and prolonged immobility. 27 In addition, concurrent prothrombotic genetic risk factors, including factor V Leiden and non-O blood types, are linked to CAT events, as well. 28 Cancer-associated risk factors include cancer site, stage, and duration since diagnosis. 27 - 32 Brain, pancreatic, gastric cancers, and adenocarcinoma are associated with the highest risk of VTE, followed by lung, ovarian, testicular, renal, and bladder malignancies. 33 , 34 Numerous investigations have shown that metastatic disease is a significant risk factor for CAT. 10 , 35 Thrombosis is also associated with hematological malignancies, particularly multiple myeloma, acute leukemia, and lymphoma. 24 The treatment outcomes of solid and hematological malignancies were compared in a study of cancer patients with VTE from the Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry. 36 According to the authors’ findings, individuals with hematological malignancies had a lower probability of developing PE in comparison with those with isolated DVT. In addition, they were more prone to experiencing upper extremity DVT, which was frequently associated with catheterization. 36 Compared with patients with solid tumors, those with hematological CAT had substantially lower rates of symptomatic recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Treatment-associated risks encompass various medical interventions, including surgery, hormonal therapy, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, blood transfusions, hospitalization, central venous catheters, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, immunotherapy, protein kinase inhibitors, transfusions, and cell-line stimulating agents, targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, which all have been linked to VTE. 18 , 23 , 24 , 37 - 40 An increased number of platelets are significantly and autonomously linked to VTE in cancer patients, particularly when considering hematologic indicators. 41 - 43 According to one study, people with a platelet count of ⩾443 × 109/L have a 3.5 times higher chance of developing VTE. 44 In addition, decreased hemoglobin concentrations and increased leukocyte counts are associated with an increased risk of VTE in cancer patients. 43 , 45 , 46 Additional biomarkers that are linked to the presence of VTE in cancer patients in the Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS) include elevated levels of soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin), prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), and D-dimer in the plasma, and the thrombin generation potential. 42 , 47 - 49 In addition, individuals who have faraway metastases have substantially higher levels of sP-selectin, F1 + 2, and D-dimer than patients with localized cancers. 50 C-reactive protein (CRP) 44 has been linked to a higher likelihood of cancer-associated VTE. Nevertheless, it ought to be noted that certain investigations have failed to reproduce the correlation between CRP and VTE that is linked to cancer. 51

Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

To comprehend the complexity of CAT, the observed pathophysiological mechanisms of CAT in various cancer types will be discussed ( Table 1 ). In addition, the pathophysiological mechanisms of CAT can be divided into 2 main categories: direct and indirect mechanisms, all of which elucidate the complexity of such a common and burdensome clinical entity.

Direct Mechanisms of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Tissue factor

The protein known as tissue factor (TF) is widely recognized as a procoagulant that originates from tumors, but it is expressed in large quantities on subendothelial cells, including fibroblasts, pericytes, and vascular smooth muscle cells. 88 Its primary function is to initiate a hemostatic response following vascular injury. Cancer-associated thrombosis is distinguished by the initiation of coagulation, disruption of fibrinolytic mechanisms, inflammation, and the generation of cytokines. 89 , 90 as illustrated in Figure 1 . The role TF in inducing hypercoagulability in the context of CAT appears to be significant. 91 The TF is known to act as a procoagulant by triggering the extrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade through its association with factor VII, thereby facilitating the activation of factor X and consequent generation of factor Xa. Tumorous cells have the ability to express TF in a constitutive manner and subsequently release extracellular vesicles (EVs) that express TF, ultimately resulting in the formation of thrombin and fibrin. 54 , 92 , 93

Tissue factor is commonly identified in an extensive range of tumor subtypes, with an especially high prevalence in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and glioblastoma. 52 , 53 Genetic mutations can lead to heightened expression of TF in specific variety of cancer. Mutations in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene ( KRAS ) and tumor protein 53 ( TP53 ) genes have been found to increase the expression of TF in human colorectal cancer cell lines. 54 In addition, it has been noted that aberrations in the KRAS, TP53 , and Phospatase and tensin homolog ( PTEN ) genes have been linked with enhanced TF mRNA expression in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) tumors of patients. 55 , 56 According to a recent investigation, the rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is correlated with heightened expression of TF protein in individuals diagnosed with NSCLC. 94 Moreover, a number of retrospective investigations 94 - 101 and clinical trials 102 - 105 have documented elevated incidences of VTE (ranging from 8% to 47% and 1.1% to 6.4%, respectively) among lung cancer patients exhibiting ALK rearrangement, as opposed to those without such rearrangement. Oncogenes have been demonstrated to enhance TF expression by cancer cells in animal studies; thus, it is probable that ALK rearrangement could also increase TF expression, thus raising the risk of VTE. 94 ALK-rearrangement-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in NSCLC cells is one of the proposed pathways. 94 Epithelial-mesenchymal transition induces a procoagulant state via TF.

Extracellular vesicles are submicron vesicles secreted by cells, specifically cancer cells. 106 Extracellular vesicles are known to be a means by which active tumor-derived TF is released into the bloodstream. In-house assays that quantify extracellular vesicle tissue factor (EVTF) activity have been developed by other researchers. 57 , 107 - 110 Numerous researchers discovered that cancer patients have higher levels of EVTF activity in comparison with healthy participants. 57 - 61 ,107 Patients with adenocarcinoma exhibit significantly higher levels of EVTF activity in comparison with individuals who have different histological forms of tumor. 61 Enhanced EVTF activity has also been linked to an elevated likelihood of VTE among cancer patient populations afflicted with diverse malignancies. 107 , 111 , 112 In longitudinal and prospective investigations, an association was discovered between EVTF activity and VTE in PDAC patients. 57 , 60 , 62 , 63 In contrast, one study found no correlation between EVTF activity and VTE in patients with PDAC. 113 Even so, that research had a significantly longer (2 years) follow-up period than other studies. Collectively, these studies indicate that tumor-derived TF + EVs contribute to VTE in PDAC patients. Three studies have found that tumor TF expression is linked to VTE in ovarian cancer patients. 64 - 66 Unlike these studies, one study found no association between EVTF activity and VTE in ovarian cancer patients. 114 Other researchers have reported that there is no correlation between EVTF activity and VTE in patients with various types of cancer, including colorectal, stomach, small cell lung carcinoma, multiple myeloma, and acute myeloid leukemia. 58 , 63 , 113 , 115 Microparticles (MPs) are classified as small membrane vesicles with a diameter ranging from 0.1 to 1 µm. Typically, these vesicles are released by apoptotic or activated normal cells, as well as quiescent malignant cells. 80 When liberated from cancer cells, they have the ability to improve prothrombotic pathways in cancer in both direct and indirect ways. The coagulation protease cascade constituents are organized on their respective membrane surface. It has been reported that TF-expressing MPs in cancer patients originate from cancer cells; however, TF-positive MPs have also been detected to be released by activated endothelial cells and monocytes. The generation and release of various pro-inflammatory cytokines by cancer cells can trigger the activation of endothelial cells and monocytes, leading to the release of TF-positive MPs. The precise proportion of TF-positive MPs in cancer patients that can be attributed to either the tumor or host cells has yet to be definitively established. 80 In vitro and in vivo procoagulant activity associated with tumor-derived vesicles has been documented in breast and hepatocarcinoma cell lines, along with circulating MP that elevated in vivo coagulation in a number of additional cancer types. 80 The surface expression of active TF and the presence of phosphatidylserine are potential mechanisms for VTE induced by MPs. These factors facilitate the assembly of coagulation complexes on the negatively charged surface of phosphatidylserine. 116 The crucial role of cancer-associated DVT has been reported to involve the externalization of phosphatidylethanolamine from pancreatic cancer MPs. 81 The correlation between TF-positive MPs and VTE complications has solely been documented in pancreatic cancer patients. 117

Platelets

The protein known as podoplanin (PDPN) has been identified as a potent activator and aggregator of platelets. This effect is mediated by the C-type lectin receptor 2 (CLEC-2) in response to tumor cell-induced platelet activation. 118 The production of PDP has been observed in pancreatic cancer cell lines, which is attributed to the cancer-associated fibroblasts. 119 C-type lectin receptor 2 depletion in platelets decreased venous thrombosis in an inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis model of DVT; this effect was reverted by infusion of wild-type platelets. This elevated level of circulating PDP in the IVC wall after stenosis was proportional to the severity of thrombosis. 120 The existence of tumor-related PDP has been identified as a risk factor for VTE in brain cancer patients. 67 Multiple hypotheses suggest that cancer cells secrete PDP into the bloodstream to control thrombosis at other locations. This is in line with the findings of additional research that identified tumor-derived MPs containing PDP in the peripheral circulation of patients with colorectal and pancreatic cancers. 68 , 69 Multiple varieties of cancer, including mesothelioma, seminoma, and glioma, express PDPN. 67 , 70 , 71 A recent study found a correlation between the expression of PDPN protein in tumors and VTE in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma patients. 72 Similar to TF, PDPN is secreted from cells in the form of EVs. A research study employed flow cytometry to identify PDPN + EVs in the plasma of patients diagnosed with pancreatic and colorectal cancer. 68 Nevertheless, there was no correlation between the levels of PDPN + EVs and VTE in cancer patients. Gi et al 121 did research that assessed the expression of PDPN in venous thrombi obtained postmortem from cancer patients. According to the study, PDPN was expressed in 44% of cancer cells found in venous thrombi. 121

Mucins are characterized by the presence of densely glycosylated O-linked sites, which serve as ligands for selectin molecules. Mucins use adhesion-dependent signaling to promote cell thrombosis. In vitro experiments have demonstrated that mucins are incapable of directly activating platelets. However, when incubated with whole blood, mucins were found to induce platelet activation, indicating a plausible association with the L-selectin. The administration of purified mucin in mice resulted in the formation of intravascular microthrombi that were rich in platelets. This finding is consistent with previous reports and provides additional mechanistic understanding of the role of mucin in the formation of microthrombi. 122 Numerous forms of cancer are characterized by abnormal expression and modified glycosylation of numerous mucins. 123 Cancer patients’ prothrombotic potential is determined by the interaction between L-selectin and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 on neutrophils and P-selectin on platelets to produce cathepsin G from neutrophils. 122 The activation of platelets and subsequent initiation of thrombosis in cancer patients may be facilitated by cancer cells. Several mechanisms contribute to platelet activation: 124 , 125

Tumor Cell Release Procoagulant Factors: Many cancer cells release procoagulant factors such as TF and cancer procoagulant (CP). Such compounds have the potential to trigger the coagulation cascade and activate platelets.

Inflammation and Endothelial Damage: Cancer can cause inflammation and damage to endothelium. Injured endothelial cells expose collagen and TF, which activate platelets.

Platelet Interaction with Tumor Cells: Platelets can directly interact with tumor cells. This connection stimulates platelet activity, which subsequently boosts the viability and spread of tumor cells.

Platelet-Derived MPs: Platelets release MPs when activated. These MPs carry procoagulant molecules and contribute to thrombus formation.

Overall, CAT is a complex process involving the interaction of various factors, including cancer-related substances, inflammation, and the coagulation cascade. Platelet activation plays a critical role in the formation of blood clots in individuals with cancer, increasing their risk of thrombosis. It is important for health care providers to monitor and manage this risk in cancer patients to prevent potentially serious complications.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1

The inhibition of fibrinolysis has been ascribed to plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), which has been discovered to be abundantly present in cancer cells. An increase in plasma PAI-1 concentration reduces fibrinolytic activity, thereby increasing the susceptibility of individuals to thrombotic events. 88 , 126 Patients with cancer exhibit alterations in the fibrinolytic system. Plasminogen activator inhibitor is a serine protease that inhibits the activity of tissue plasminogen activator and urokinase, thereby promoting fibrin formation and accumulation ( Figure 1 ). 39 On administration of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug bevacizumab, thrombus levels increase significantly, resulting in elevated levels of PAI-1 in both the tumor and plasma. The administration of a PAI-1 inhibitor reduced the thrombotic effect of bevacizumab significantly. This finding suggests that a PAI-1 inhibitor may have the potential to improve the resolution of VTE in CAT patients. 127 Elevated levels of circulating PAI-1 have been observed in other cancer types, such as melanoma, colorectal, breast, and mostly pancreatic cancer. 73 - 77 This occurs as a result of the suppression of plasminogen activator and consequent disruption of fibrinolysis, which leads to the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation, reduced blood flow, and dysfunction of organs in afflicted individuals. 77 The existing literature on the correlation between PAI-1 levels and VTE in cancer patients is scarce. It is hypothesized that the PAI-1 activity exceeds that of the PAI-1 antigen because the latter comprises both active and inactive forms of PAI-1. Indeed, a case-control research examining VTE biomarkers revealed that PAI-1 activity outperformed PAI-1 antigen in differentiating VTE patients from healthy individuals. 128 A correlation between PAI-1 activity degree and VTE among individuals with pancreatic cancer was identified. It appears that PAI-1 may contribute to the development of VTE in this patient population. 78 On the contrary, the other study did not find any correlation between PAI-1 antigen and VTE in individuals diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. 129 In addition, a lack of correlation was observed between prior DVT and plasma concentrations of PAI-1 antigen and activity among individuals diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. 76 In total, 11 of 14 patients in this study, nevertheless, demonstrated intermittent maxima in both PAI-1 antigen and PAI-1 activity. This implies that such individuals might undergo temporary conditions of hypercoagulability.

Cancer procoagulant

Cancer procoagulant is a cysteine protease that can initiate the coagulation cascade by directly activating factor X, regardless of factor VII. Originally identified in malignant rabbit tissue, it was subsequently extracted from human carcinomas exhibiting procoagulant activity. Cancer procoagulant cleaves the FX heavy chain at a distinct location compared with all alternative factor X activators. 79 A study of women with breast cancer, nevertheless, found no correlation between CP and procoagulant markers, leading to doubts about the integrity of the CP preparations used in previous investigations and the possibility of TF/factor VIIa contamination. 130

Tumor-derived platelet agonists

Cancer cells release adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to activate and aggregate platelets through the P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors. Thrombin production has likewise been observed in pancreatic tumors, which was confirmed by elevated levels of thrombin in individuals with pancreatic cancer. 60 Thrombin and ADP are platelet aggregation agonists, which aid in the process of primary hemostasis. It might thus elucidate why these tumor-derived products in cancer patients improve platelet activation and coagulation, which is consistent with prior research on the impact of tumor-derived agonists on platelets. 80

Indirect Mechanisms of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Cancer-derived factors and their associated mechanisms with the capacity to enhance interactions with host cells have been shown to induce thromboembolic complications in individuals with cancer.

Inflammatory cytokines

The c cells have the ability to produce and release a significant proportion of inflammatory cytokines that exhibit a procoagulant phenotype. These cytokines have the potential to augment thrombogenesis and cause damage to the endothelial cells of the host. The presence of a tumor induces a reactive response in the host’s inflammatory tissues, leading to an excessive secretion of cytokines. 131 The production of cytokines by cancer cells (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6, and IL-17), activated platelets, and leukocytes also contributes to endothelium injury and thrombus formation ( Figure 1 ). All of these overlapping pathways may also result in the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation, which is a significant contributor to thromboembolic complications. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IL-1β are widely recognized as prominent pro-inflammatory cytokines. Studies have suggested that these cytokines may have prothrombotic effects and could potentially induce the expression of TF and von Willebrand factor on vascular endothelial cells. 132 Nonetheless, TNF-α and IL-1β exhibit a downregulating effect on thrombomodulin, which is a receptor present on endothelial cells. This receptor binds with thrombin and is responsible for activating protein C, thereby functioning as a regulator of antithrombotic activity. The inflammatory cytokines inhibit the production of nitric oxide and prostacyclin from endothelial cells while simultaneously increasing their prothrombotic activity. This is accomplished by stimulating the production of fibrinolysis inhibitor, PAI-1. The procoagulant phenotype observed in host cells is attributed to the secretion of growth and pro-angiogenic factors, such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), VEGF, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Macrophages produce an excessive amount of TF, which is triggered and stimulated by the presence of VEGF produced by different types of tumor cells. The activation of hemostasis is facilitated by markers of endothelial activation, namely thrombomodulin and von Willebrand factor, as well as coagulation markers. The presence of G-CSF has been reported to induce hypercoagulation, as indicated by the elevated concentrations of these biomarkers. It has been established that bFGF exacerbates the upregulation of TF expression on endothelial cells. 133

Adhesion molecules

There have been reports indicating that cancer cells facilitate the adherence of blood vessel walls, stimulate interactions with blood cells, and activate the procoagulant capabilities of host leukocytes, platelets, and endothelial cells. Endothelial cell adhesion to tumor cells may induce regional coagulation and subsequent thrombus formation near the blood vessel wall. The attachment of various types of tumor cells to endothelial cells is facilitated by a myriad of adhesion molecules. Namely, E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 enable the attachment and rolling of human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line (HT-29M) colon carcinoma cells and A375M cells on activated endothelial cells under shear stress. This occurrence results in heightened aggregate formation and facilitates thrombosis through the obstruction of vascular patency. 134 Moreover, the synthesis of P-selectin by endothelial cells and its activation by platelets promotes the adhesion of cancer cells. Nevertheless, the existence of the P-selectin ligand on cancer cells has yet to be verified. The interplay among cancer cells, platelets, and endothelial cells leads to the creation of cell-cell aggregates, subsequently causing hindrance in blood circulation and encouraging coagulation and occlusion of vessels. 134

Neutrophil extracellular traps

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are a type of mesh composed of DNA, histones, and neutrophil-derived proteases. Initially identified for their antimicrobial properties, these structures are noted to be generated in vitro in response to factors derived from pancreatic cancer. Neutrophil extracellular traps have been demonstrated to increase venous and arterial thrombosis in mice and act as a substrate for direct platelet adhesion and aggregation. 135 , 136 The presence of NETs associated with cancer may facilitate the stimulation of host cells, thereby promoting thromboembolic events. This may occur through the activation of endothelial cells by histones associated with NETs, which could result in an increase in the release of von Willebrand factor. 137 - 139 It has been observed that cytokines produced by tumors have the ability to stimulate the activation of endothelial cells ( Figure 1 ). Neutrophil extracellular traps containing histones have the capability to activate platelets directly, thereby inducing additional thrombin generation, 140 but also, NETs have the capability to augment thrombosis by entrapping platelets and EVs, which comprise TF-positive (TF+) EVs. 141 - 144 Numerous agents such as cytokines, proteins, and other factors have been observed to induce the formation of NETs in cancer. 139 , 145 - 151 On the contrary, numerous biomarkers have been employed to evaluate the occurrence of NET formation 151 - 158 with citrullinated histone H3 (H3Cit) and H3Cit-DNA complexes, as well as Myeloperoxidase (MPO)-DNA complexes being the most optimal. 159 Multiple examinations have investigated the relationship between NET biomarkers and VTE and arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) in cancer patients. Mauracher et al 82 conducted a study where they quantified the concentrations of cfDNA, nucleosomes, and H3Cit in the plasma of 984 individuals diagnosed with cancer; 9%, or 89, had a VTE during the 2-year follow-up. Significantly, H3Cit was linked to VTE. In addition, cfDNA and nucleosomes were only associated with VTE during the high-risk period (3-6 months after diagnosis). Although subanalyses were underpowered, Mauracher et al 82 identified significant correlations between plasma H3Cit levels and VTE in patients with lung and pancreatic cancer. They found a weak correlation in individuals with breast cancer, and no correlation in patients with brain or colon/rectal cancer. In a limited investigation involving 27 cancer patients, it was observed that there is no correlation between cfDNA or nucleosomes and VTE in cancer patients. 154 A research conducted on a sample of 177 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma revealed that 43% of them had portal VT. The study found that cfDNA, neutrophil elastase, and DNA-histone complexes were significantly linked to thrombosis. 83 In a research conducted on a cohort of 52 individuals diagnosed with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), half of whom had a prior previous medical record of thrombosis, the presence of MPO-DNA complexes was found to be significantly correlated with thrombotic events. 84 In addition, a recent study discovered that there was no discernible disparity in the amounts of H3Cit within thrombi from cancer patients and those from noncancer patients. 121 In a study conducted by Grilz et al, 160 the plasma levels of cfDNA, nucleosomes, and H3Cit were measured in a cohort of 957 cancer patients. Among these patients, 22 individuals (2%) experienced an ATE over the course of the 2-year monitoring period. No correlation was identified between any of the NET biomarkers and ATE. However, it was found that H3Cit and cfDNA were significantly linked to increased mortality. A smaller-scale investigation was conducted to evaluate cfDNA and nucleosomes in a group of 138 cancer patients, of whom 38 (27%) had experienced a stroke. The study revealed a significant correlation between cfDNA and stroke occurrence. 161

Hypoxia

The hypoxic microenvironment created by tumors promotes endothelial dysfunction. During hypoxia, endothelial cells exhibit an increased release of phospholipase A2, resulting in excessive production of prostaglandins and synthesis of platelet-activating factor (PAF). In addition to its platelet-activating properties, PAF also stimulates neutrophils, thereby facilitating their adhesion to endothelial cells in hypoxic environments. The decrease in neutrophil adhesion to hypoxic endothelial cells was observed following the inhibition of PAF release. 162 The condition of hypoxia results in the exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies from the endothelial cells. Consequently, this results in the liberation of von Willebrand factor and P-selectin overexpression, which in turn increases the indirect procoagulant response. Increased ADP synthesis amidst hypoxia in cancer patients may also result in increased platelet activation. 163

Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns

Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are a group of molecules that consist of histones, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), S100 proteins, and heat shock proteins. These molecules are primarily located within the cell and are generated by senescent tumor cells either on cell death or due to cell stress. On their release, they activate innate immune pattern recognition receptors and trigger defensive reactions, thereby propagating a host response. Nevertheless, DAMPs can further induce chronic inflammation and immune cell activation in the host, leading to thrombotic events and facilitating the proliferation and viability of tumors. In contrast to a sample of healthy controls, plasma circulating nucleosomes were reportedly higher in cancer patients. 164 Histones and HMGB1 are DAMPs that exhibit significant procoagulant activity. The identification of these molecules in the peripheral circulation of individuals diagnosed with cancer signifies heightened neutrophil activation and platelet aggregation Consequently, this results in the liberation of NETs and an increased potential for thrombosis. 165 Elevated levels of extracellular DNA have been documented in individuals diagnosed with PE, indicating a potential correlation between extracellular DNA and thromboembolic complications. 166 Nevertheless, the extent of their involvement in both cancer and noncancer patients remains to be comprehensively elucidated.

Cancer-associated treatments

There are numerous cancer treatments, but currently, chemotherapy is the most prevalent and widely accessible. There are reports indicating that cisplatin-based treatment increases the occurrence of thromboembolic events in individuals with cancer. Nonetheless, the precise mechanism responsible for the development of cisplatin-induced thrombosis remains unclear. Two human endothelial cell lines were subjected to cisplatin treatment, which induced apoptosis. In addition, procoagulant endothelium MPs were produced, leading to the generation of thrombin. Notably, this thrombin formation occurred independently of TF. 167 Multiple separate mechanisms contribute to this prothrombotic activity, including the direct damage to the endothelium caused by the medication and the increased expression of TF procoagulant activity in monocytes and macrophages, which triggers a procoagulant response from the host cells. The direct hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy can contribute significantly to the promotion of hypercoagulation by blocking natural anticoagulant proteins, including protein S, protein C, and antithrombin. 168 In addition, chemotherapy triggers apoptosis in both cancerous and host endothelium cells, leading to the secretion of cytokines and an elevation in TF expression and function. 168

Coagulation gene defects

There have been reports indicating that hemostatic genes in cancer cells can be deregulated by oncogenic mutations and certain coagulant effectors. 169 The occurrence of CAT has been linked to oncogenic mutations in cancer cells, irrespective of the tumor types, in certain individuals with cancer. Several mutations, including STK11, KRAS, CTNNB1, KEAP1, CDKN2B , and MET , have been identified as potential predictors of a substantial rise in the occurrence of colorectal adenocarcinoma in patients up to 1 year prior to their primary diagnosis. 85 Furthermore, it has been reported that the presence of elevated factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutation increases the likelihood of thromboembolic complications in individuals with gastrointestinal cancers. 86 The susceptibility to hypercoagulability in breast cancer patients was found to have a novel association with single nucleotide polymorphisms of factors V and X, and the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR). 87 The presence of 2 identical copies of the fibrinogen gamma gene (FGG) rs2066865 has been linked to a higher likelihood of developing VTE in individuals with active cancer, specifically an elevated risk of PE in cancer patients. 170

Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Various anticoagulant protocols, such as vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), have been assessed for the treatment of CAT. Low-molecular-weight heparin as a sole therapeutic agent has been the established method for treating CAT for a considerable period of time. 171 , 172 According to a meta-analysis, the use of LMWH in comparison with vitamin K antagonists was linked to a noteworthy mitigation of the risk of recurring incidents, while not posing an enormous escalation in the likelihood of severe bleeding. 173 Although LMWHs offer various benefits over vitamin K antagonists such as reliable pharmacokinetics, shorter half-life, and fewer drug-drug interactions, their requirement for injections administered once or twice as a day and at higher expenses may lead to reduced adherence and persistence among patients. 173 When it comes to the treatment of acute VTE in the general populace, DOACs have emerged as a genuine, a safer, more convenient, more and efficient option. As their risk-to-benefit ratio is superior to that of vitamin K antagonists, DOACs are currently the treatment of choice in this context. 174 , 175 In light of the abovementioned results and their favorable characteristics, DOACs—particularly the Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors Apixaban, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban—have been evaluated in comparison with LMWH for the treatment of CAT. 176 - 179 In comparison with LMWH, patients who received DOACs had a significantly reduced risk of recurrent VTE events, although there was no significant increase in major bleeding events. However, there was a significant rise in clinically significant nonmajor bleeding, according to a meta-analysis that compiled the results of all randomized controlled trials. 180 Studies using randomized controlled trials have indicated that patients who receive DOACs, specifically edoxaban and rivaroxaban, in comparison with LMWH, are at a greater risk for experiencing major bleeding episodes. 177 , 179 The observed results appear to be attributed to a surplus of gastrointestinal hemorrhages that predominantly manifest in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal malignancies. 181 Due to the absence of comparative studies and substantial variability among the clinical trials, it is not feasible to endorse a particular DOAC over another. The present suggestions, which are grounded in the prior findings, suggest that the favored therapeutic alternatives for CAT are apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or LMWH. 182 - 186 The optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy should be between 3 and 6 months, or longer if the malignancy is active or the patient has ongoing risk factors. 187 On the contrary, important question is posted—specifically, does a 3% to 5% absolute gain in VTE incidence justify the treatment of >90% of patients who will not benefit but will be required to self-administer a daily injection, possibly for the remainder of their lives, with no improvement in progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS)? 187 The customization of anticoagulation therapy should be contingent on the patient’s individual characteristics and inclinations. Furthermore, it is imperative that the therapy be adjusted and evaluated periodically in response to changes in the patient’s cancer status and treatment regimen. 188 Finally, it is noteworthy to mention that vitamin K agonist (VKA) is discouraged in cancer patients in many places due to difficulty in regulating international normalised ratio (INR)/less time in therapeutic range and thus higher bleeding risk, which can be due to many interactions with antineoplastic treatment, difficulties in securing consistent nutrient and fluid intake, and so on.

Guidelines for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Prevention in Cancer Patients

Taking into account the aforementioned factors, risk scores have been created to predict VTE events in cancer patients. Risk scores facilitate patient education, enhance awareness of VTE and its associated morbidity in individuals with cancer, enable VTE screening in asymptomatic cancer patients at high risk, and, in certain instances, permit the implementation of primary VTE prophylaxis in cancer outpatients. 189 The Khorana score is a commonly used metric. 43 The Khorana score helps assess the risk of VTE in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. It includes the following parameters:

Site of cancer: Certain types of cancer, such as pancreatic, lung, stomach, and hematological malignancies, carry a higher risk of thrombosis.

Body mass index (BMI): Obesity is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis.

Hemoglobin level: Low levels of hemoglobin may indicate anemia, which is a risk factor for thrombosis.

Prechemotherapy platelet count: Elevated platelet counts may increase the risk of thrombosis.

Prechemotherapy leukocyte count: Elevated leukocyte counts may indicate an inflammatory state, which can contribute to thrombosis.

The mentioned system bestows points based on the distinct attributes of the patient and the tumor. Furthermore, it has the capability to categorize the risk of CAT into 3 distinct groups: high risk, intermediate risk, and low risk, with corresponding VTE event rates of 7%, 2%, and approximately 0.5%, respectively, over a period of 2.5 months. The Vienna score is an additional CAT risk score that has been validated for use. 190 The Vienna CATS score is designed to predict the risk of recurrent VTE in cancer patients. It includes the following parameters:

Site of cancer: Certain cancer types, such as pancreatic, lung, and gynecological cancers, are associated with a higher risk of recurrent VTE.

Previous VTE history: A history of previous VTE increases the risk of recurrence.

Platelet count: Elevated platelet counts may be indicative of a prothrombotic state.

Hemoglobin level: Low hemoglobin levels may contribute to thrombosis risk.

Leukocyte count: Elevated leukocyte counts may indicate an inflammatory state, increasing the risk of recurrence.

Both the Khorana score and the Vienna CATS score have been widely studied and have shown utility in risk stratification for CAT. 191 However, it is important to note that the success and applicability of these scores may differ contingent on the particular patient population and the context in which they are used. It is important to note that while these scoring systems can provide valuable risk assessment information, they are not infallible and should be used in conjunction with clinical judgment. Furthermore, continuous research and enhancements to these scoring systems have the potential to enhance their effectiveness and suitability in clinical settings. It should be emphasized that scores in cancer patients have only been evaluated in ambulatory outpatients, while studies for thromboprophylaxis have been conducted in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or in postsurgical cancer patients, while no specific studies are available in medical inpatients as cancer per se is a risk factor for VTE.

Also, several scores have been proposed for predicting the risk of cancer based on type of cancer and patient characteristics but they have a limited predictive value. In addition, only some of them incorporate biomarkers such as D-dimer or P-Selectin and but they do not include any cancer cytogenetic data. 192 The rationale behind the establishment of guidelines is attributed to the heightened susceptibility of cancer patients to VTE, with most of the occurrences transpiring in the outpatient milieu. The frequency of VTE among individuals with cancer is on the rise, in tandem with the growing population of cancer patients. 193 Guidelines have the advantage of aiding the integration of evidence into practice. However, the extent of these advantages varies across various medical fields, thereby necessitating the emergence of implementation research. 194 The latest data indicate that patient adoption of VTE prophylaxis is relatively high (>90%), but information regarding patient adherence at home, co-pay/out-of-pocket costs, and prescription refill is unavailable. Provider factors, external factors, and guideline content are additional areas that mirror the standard implementation obstacles seen in all medical fields. Several major oncology and hematology organizations have published guidelines 182 , 183 , 185 , 195 , 196 for the prevention of VTE in cancer outpatients. The implementation of VTE prophylaxis guidelines is influenced by external factors, primarily financial constraints and time limitations that affect productivity and clinic flow. According to recent publications, prophylaxis has been found to be cost-effective in various health care systems. However, this is only applicable to patient populations with a higher risk and when lower-cost agents are used. 197 - 200 The limitations imposed by time include restricted opportunities for direct interaction with patients, a heavily burdened oncology workforce, and the requirement for substantial initial and continuous education in hematology. In this regard, there is a substantial obstacle for small or rural oncology practices that have restricted resources for information technology infrastructure and the execution of practice flow modifications. The literature describes the best VTE prophylactic approaches for outpatient cancer patients. These methods are based on limited studies. 201 - 204 In the aftermath, there is pressing need for novel interventions that can reduce the risk of hemorrhage, improve the education of both health care providers and patients, and facilitate the development of streamlined and effective risk assessment instruments.

Conclusions

Growing incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates from VTE in cancer patients pose a serious threat to an already complicated and harsh disease such as cancer. Cancer-associated thrombosis as a perplexing and dangerous adverse event is explained by numerous pathophysiological mechanisms, most of which are observed in clinical scenarios of various cancer types. Unfortunately, there is no consensus regarding prevention and prophylactic guidelines, especially for outpatients. Hence, further and more thorough research is necessary to define pathophysiological targets that can be aimed for adequate prevention and diagnosis of CAT.

Footnotes

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (agreement no. 451-03-47/2023-01/200111).

Author Contributions: Dragica Pavlovic: Conceptualization; Visualization; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

Danijela Niciforovic: Conceptualization; Visualization; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

Marina Markovic: Conceptualization; Supervision; Writing – review & editing.

Dragana Papic: Conceptualization; Visualization; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

ORCID iDs: Dragica Pavlovic https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-7495

Dragana Papic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-3979

References

1. Iorga RA, Bratu OG, Marcu RD, et al. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: still looking for answers. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18:5026-5032. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8019

2. Bouillaud SBJ. De l’obliteration des veines et de son influence sur la formation des hydropisies partielles: consideration sur la hydropisies passive et general. Arch Gen Med. 1823;1:188-204. https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=e001c8cd-a3cf-4d55-95c7-952530ea1f95

3. Trousseau A. Phlegmasia alba dolens. Clin Médicale Hôtel Dieu Paris. 1865;3:652-695

4. Dahm AEA. Cancer and thrombosis: new treatments, new challenges. Med Sci (Basel). 2021;9:41. doi: 10.3390/medsci9020041

5. Chew TW, Gau CS, Wen YW, Shen LJ, Mullins CD, Hsiao FY. Epidemiology, clinical profile and treatment patterns of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients in Taiwan: a population-based study. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:298. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1200-6

6. Ashrani AA, Gullerud RE, Petterson TM, Marks RS, Bailey KR, Heit JA. Risk factors for incident venous thromboembolism in active cancer patients: a population based case-control study. Thromb Res. 2016;139:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.01.002

7. Trujillo-Santos J, Martos FM, Font C, et al. Analysis of clinical factors affecting the rates of fatal pulmonary embolism and bleeding in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism. Heliyon. 2017;3:e00229. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00229

8. Mulder FI, Horváth-Puhó E, van Es N, et al. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a population-based cohort study. Blood. 2021;137:1959-1969. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007338

9. Dewilde S, Lloyd AJ, Holm M, Lee A. Quality of life of patients experiencing cancer-associated thrombosis. Value Health. 2015;18:A397-A398. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.906

10. Chew HK, Wun T, Harvey D, Zhou H, White RH. Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:458-464. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.4.458

11. Sørensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Olsen JH, Baron JA. Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1846-1850. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012213432504

12. Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Kuderer NM, Lyman GH. Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:632-634. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02374.x

13. Puurunen MK, Gona PN, Larson MG, Murabito JM, Magnani JW, O’Donnell CJ. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the Framingham Heart Study. Thromb Res. 2016;145:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.06.033

14. Turpie AG, Haas S, Weitz JI, et al. GARFIELD-VTE: 6-month outcomes. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2017;1:1-5. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Turpie+AG,+Haas+S,+Weitz+JI,et+al.+GARFIELD-VTE:+6-month+outcomes&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

15. Kourlaba G, Relakis J, Mylonas C, et al. The humanistic and economic burden of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2015;26:13-31. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000193

16. Lyman GH, Culakova E, Poniewierski MS, Kuderer NM. Morbidity, mortality and costs associated with venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer. Thromb Res. 2018;164:S112-S118. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.01.028

17. Khorana AA, McCrae KR, Milentijevic D, et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with cancer. J Med Econ. 2020;23:323-329. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1703190

18. Khorana AA, Connolly GC. Assessing risk of venous thromboembolism in the patient with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4839-4847. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3271

19. Ay C, Pabinger I, Cohen AT. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: burden, mechanisms, and management. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117:219-230. doi: 10.1160/TH16-08-0615

20. Cohen AT, Katholing A, Rietbrock S, Bamber L, Martinez C. Epidemiology of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer. A population-based cohort study. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117:57-65. doi: 10.1160/TH15-08-0686

21. da Costa WL, Jr, Guffey D, Oluyomi A, et al. Patterns of venous thromboembolism risk, treatment, and outcomes among patients with cancer from uninsured and vulnerable populations. Am J Hematol. 2022;97:1044-1054. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26623

22. Zöller B, Palmer K, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Family history of venous thromboembolism and risk of hospitalized thromboembolism in cancer patients: a nationwide family study. Thromb Res. 2015;136:573-581. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.07.004

23. Gervaso L, Dave H, Khorana AA. Venous and arterial thromboembolism in patients with cancer: JACC: CardioOncology state-of-the-art review. JACC Cardiooncol. 2021;3:173-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.03.001

24. Streiff MB, Holmstrom B, Angelini D, et al. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease. Version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:1181-1201. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0047

25. Numico G, Garrone O, Dongiovanni V, et al. Prospective evaluation of major vascular events in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine. Cancer. 2005;103:994-999. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20893

26. Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Kuderer NM, Lyman GH. Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer. 2007;110:2339-2346. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23062

27. Khorana AA, Francis CW, Culakova E, Lyman GH. Risk factors for chemotherapy-associated venous thromboembolism in a prospective observational study. Cancer. 2005;104:2822-2829. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21496

28. Pabinger I, Ay C, Dunkler D, et al. Factor V Leiden mutation increases the risk for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients—results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS). J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13:17-22. doi: 10.1111/jth.12778

29. Timp JF, Braekkan SK, Versteeg HH, Cannegieter SC. Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis. Blood. 2013;122:1712-1723. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-460121

30. Walker AJ, Card TR, West J, Crooks C, Grainge MJ. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer—a cohort study using linked United Kingdom databases. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1404-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.10.021

31. Cronin-Fenton DP, Søndergaard F, Pedersen LA, et al. Hospitalisation for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients and the general population: a population-based cohort study in Denmark, 1997-2006. Br J Cancer. 2010;103:947-953. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605883

32. Horsted F, West J, Grainge MJ. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001275

33. Schmaier AA, Ambesh P, Campia U. Venous thromboembolism and cancer. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018;20:89. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-1034-3

34. Streiff MB, Milentijevic D, McCrae K, et al. Effectiveness and safety of anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:664-671. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25059

35. Blom JW, Vanderschoot JP, Oostindiër MJ, Osanto S, van der Meer FJ, Rosendaal FR. Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:529-535. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01804.x

36. Lecumberri R, Ruiz-Artacho P, Tzoran I, et al. Outcome of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism is more favorable among patients with hematologic malignancies than in those with solid tumors. Thromb Haemost. 2022;122:1594-1602. doi: 10.1055/a-1777-4006

37. Nalluri SR, Chu D, Keresztes R, Zhu X, Wu S. Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:2277-2285. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.656

38. Wang TF, Khorana AA, Carrier M. Thrombotic complications associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:4606. doi: 10.3390/cancers13184606

39. Kim AS, Khorana AA, McCrae KR. Mechanisms and biomarkers of cancer-associated thrombosis. Transl Res. 2020;225:33-53. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.06.012

40. Streiff MB, National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network. The National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN) guidelines on the management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Thromb Res. 2010;125:S128-S133. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(10)70030-X

41. Mandalà M, Barni S, Prins M, et al. Acquired and inherited risk factors for developing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective trial. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:871-876. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp354

42. Simanek R, Vormittag R, Ay C, et al. High platelet count associated with venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS). J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:114-120. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03680.x

43. Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E, Lyman GH, Francis CW. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2008;111:4902-4907. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116327

44. Pasceri V, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Direct proinflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000;102:2165-2168. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.18.2165

45. Moore RA, Adel N, Riedel E, et al. High incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a large retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3466-3473. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5669

46. Pabinger I, Posch F. Flamethrowers: blood cells and cancer thrombosis risk. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014:410-417. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.410

47. Ay C, Simanek R, Vormittag R, et al. High plasma levels of soluble P-selectin are predictive of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS). Blood. 2008;112:2703-2708. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-142422

48. Ay C, Vormittag R, Dunkler D, et al. D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 predict venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4124-4129. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7752

49. Ay C, Dunkler D, Simanek R, et al. Prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer by measuring thrombin generation: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2099-2103. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8294

50. Dickmann B, Ahlbrecht J, Ay C, et al. Regional lymph node metastases are a strong risk factor for venous thromboembolism: results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study. Haematologica. 2013;98:1309-1314. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.073338

51. Kanz R, Vukovich T, Vormittag R, et al. Thrombosis risk and survival in cancer patients with elevated C-reactive protein. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04069.x

52. Khorana AA, Ahrendt SA, Ryan CK, et al. Tissue factor expression, angiogenesis, and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2870-2875. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2351

53. Kasthuri RS, Taubman MB, Mackman N. Role of tissue factor in cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4834-4838. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.6324

54. Yu JL, May L, Lhotak V, et al. Oncogenic events regulate tissue factor expression in colorectal cancer cells: implications for tumor progression and angiogenesis. Blood. 2005;105:1734-1741. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-2042

55. Regina S, Rollin J, Bléchet C, Iochmann S, Reverdiau P, Gruel Y. Tissue factor expression in non-small cell lung cancer: relationship with vascular endothelial growth factor expression, microvascular density, and K-ras mutation. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:689-697. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31817c1b21

56. Regina S, Valentin JB, Lachot S, Lemarié E, Rollin J, Gruel Y. Increased tissue factor expression is associated with reduced survival in non-small cell lung cancer and with mutations of TP53 and PTEN. Clin Chem. 2009;55:1834-1842. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.123695

57. Khorana AA, Francis CW, Menzies KE, et al. Plasma tissue factor may be predictive of venous thromboembolism in pancreatic cancer. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:1983-1985. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03156.x

58. Auwerda JJ, Yuana Y, Osanto S, et al. Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity and venous thrombosis in multiple myeloma. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:14-20. doi: 10.1160/TH10-03-0187

59. Thaler J, Ay C, Mackman N, et al. Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity in patients with pancreatic cancer: correlation with clinicopathological features. Eur J Clin Investig. 2013;43:277-285. doi: 10.1111/eci.12042

60. Woei-A-Jin FJ, Tesselaar ME, Garcia Rodriguez P, Romijn FP, Bertina RM, Osanto S. Tissue factor-bearing microparticles and CA19.9: two players in pancreatic cancer-associated thrombosis? Br J Cancer. 2016;115:332-338. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.170

61. Hisada Y, Thålin C, Lundström S, Wallén H, Mackman N. Comparison of microvesicle tissue factor activity in non-cancer severely ill patients and cancer patients. Thromb Res. 2018;165:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.03.001

62. Bharthuar A, Khorana AA, Hutson A, et al. Circulating microparticle tissue factor, thromboembolism and survival in pancreaticobiliary cancers. Thromb Res. 2013;132:180-184. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.06.026

63. Kasthuri RS, Hisada Y, Ilich A, Key NS, Mackman N. Effect of chemotherapy and longitudinal analysis of circulating extracellular vesicle tissue factor activity in patients with pancreatic and colorectal cancer. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020;4:636-643. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12317

64. Uno K, Homma S, Satoh T, et al. Tissue factor expression as a possible determinant of thromboembolism in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:290-295. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603552

65. Sakurai M, Matsumoto K, Gosho M, et al. Expression of tissue factor in epithelial ovarian carcinoma is involved in the development of venous thromboembolism. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27:37-43. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000848

66. Abu Saadeh F, Norris L, O’Toole S, et al. Tumour expression of tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in ovarian cancer- relationship with venous thrombosis risk. Thromb Res. 2013;132:627-634. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.09.016

67. Riedl J, Preusser M, Nazari PM, et al. Podoplanin expression in primary brain tumors induces platelet aggregation and increases risk of venous thromboembolism. Blood. 2017;129:1831-1839. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-06-720714

68. Mege D, Panicot-Dubois L, Ouaissi M, et al. The origin and concentration of circulating microparticles differ according to cancer type and evolution: a prospective single-center study. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:939-948. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29837

69. Zwicker JI. Risking thromboembolism: podoplanin and glioma. Blood. 2017;129:1742-1743. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-763524

70. Kimura N, Kimura I. Podoplanin as a marker for mesothelioma. Pathol Int. 2005;55:83-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01791.x

71. Kato Y, Sasagawa I, Kaneko M, Osawa M, Fujita N, Tsuruo T. Aggrus: a diagnostic marker that distinguishes seminoma from embryonal carcinoma in testicular germ cell tumors. Oncogene. 2004;23:8552-8556. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207869

72. Wang X, Liu B, Xu M, et al. Blocking podoplanin inhibits platelet activation and decreases cancer-associated venous thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2021;200:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.01.008

73. Hanekom GS, Stubbings HM, Kidson SH. The active fraction of plasmatic plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 as a possible indicator of increased risk for metastatic melanoma. Cancer Detect Prev. 2002;26:50-59. doi: 10.1016/s0361-090x(02)00002-8

74. Herszènyi L, Plebani M, Carraro P, et al. The role of cysteine and serine proteases in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:1135-1142. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991001)86

75. Ferroni P, Roselli M, Portarena I, et al. Plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor—1 (PAI—1) levels in breast cancer—relationship with clinical outcome. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:1153-1161

76. Andrén-Sandberg A, Lecander I, Martinsson G, Astedt B. Peaks in plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 concentration may explain thrombotic events in cases of pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 1992;69:2884-2887. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920615)69

77. Tipoe TL, Wu WKK, Chung L, et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 for predicting sepsis severity and mortality outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1218. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01218

78. Hisada Y, Garratt KB, Maqsood A, et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 and venous thrombosis in pancreatic cancer. Blood Adv. 2021;5:487-495. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003149

79. Mandoj C, Tomao L, Conti L. Coagulation in brain tumors: biological basis and clinical implications. Front Neurol. 2019;10:181. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00181

80. Abdol Razak NB, Jones G, Bhandari M, Berndt MC, Metharom P. Cancer-associated thrombosis: an overview of mechanisms, risk factors, and treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10:380. doi: 10.3390/cancers10100380

81. Stark K, Schubert I, Joshi U, et al. Distinct pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer microvesicle-associated venous thrombosis identifies new antithrombotic targets in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38:772-786. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.310262

82. Mauracher LM, Posch F, Martinod K, et al. Citrullinated histone H3, a biomarker of neutrophil extracellular trap formation, predicts the risk of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:508-518. doi: 10.1111/jth.13951

83. Seo JD, Gu JY, Jung HS, Kim YJ, Kim HK. Contact system activation and neutrophil extracellular trap markers: risk factors for portal vein thrombosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019;25:1076029618825310. doi: 10.1177/1076029618825310

84. Guy A, Favre S, Labrouche-Colomer S, et al. High circulating levels of MPO-DNA are associated with thrombosis in patients with MPN. Leukemia. 2019;33:2544-2548. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0500-2

85. Rak J. Cancer genes and blood clots. Blood. 2021;137:1996-1997. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009967

86. Heraudeau A, Delluc A, Le Henaff M, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in association with factor V leiden in cancer patients—the EDITH case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194973

87. Tinholt M, Viken MK, Dahm AE, et al. Increased coagulation activity and genetic polymorphisms in the F5, F10 and EPCR genes are associated with breast cancer: a case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:845. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-845

88. Khorana AA, Mackman N, Falanga A, et al. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8:11. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00336-y

89. Bick RL. Cancer-associated thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:109-111. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp030086

90. Karimi M, Cohan N. Cancer-associated thrombosis. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2010;4:78-82. doi: 10.2174/1874192401004020078

91. Mukai M, Oka T. Mechanism and management of cancer-associated thrombosis. J Cardiol. 2018;72:89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.02.011

92. Geddings JE, Hisada Y, Boulaftali Y, et al. Tissue factor-positive tumor microvesicles activate platelets and enhance thrombosis in mice. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:153-166. doi: 10.1111/jth.13181

93. Davila M, Amirkhosravi A, Coll E, et al. Tissue factor-bearing microparticles derived from tumor cells: impact on coagulation activation. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:1517-1524. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02987.x

94. Yang S, Yang L, Wu Y, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement may increase the incidence of venous thromboembolism by increasing tissue factor expression in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:1307. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6619

95. Roopkumar J, Poudel SK, Gervaso L, et al. Risk of thromboembolism in patients with ALK- and EGFR-mutant lung cancer: a cohort study. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:822-829. doi: 10.1111/jth.15215

96. Al-Samkari H, Leiva O, Dagogo-Jack I, et al. Impact of ALK rearrangement on venous and arterial thrombotic risk in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15:1497-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.04.033

97. Zer A, Moskovitz M, Hwang DM, et al. ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer is associated with a high rate of venous thromboembolism. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017;18:156-161. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.10.007

98. Alexander M, Solomon B, Burbury K. Thromboembolism in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19:e71-e72. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.07.001

99. Davidsson E, Murgia N, Ortiz-Villalón C, et al. Mutational status predicts the risk of thromboembolic events in lung adenocarcinoma. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2017;12:16. doi: 10.1186/s40248-017-0097-0

100. Lee YG, Kim I, Lee E, et al. Risk factors and prognostic impact of venous thromboembolism in Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111:1112-1120. doi: 10.1160/TH13-11-0956

101. Verso M, Chiari R, Mosca S, et al. Incidence of CT scan-detected pulmonary embolism in patients with oncogene-addicted, advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Thromb Res. 2015;136:924-927. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.09.006

102. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2167-2177. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408440

103. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Mehra R, et al. Ceritinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1189-1197. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311107

104. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, et al. Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2385-2394. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214886

105. Gettinger SN, Bazhenova LA, Langer CJ, et al. Activity and safety of brigatinib in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and other malignancies: a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1683-1696. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30392-8

106. György B, Szabó TG, Pásztói M, et al. Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:2667-2688. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0689-3

107. Tesselaar ME, Romijn FP, Van Der Linden IK, Prins FA, Bertina RM, Osanto S. Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity: a link between cancer and thrombosis? J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:520-527. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02369.x

108. Lee RD, Barcel DA, Williams JC, et al. Pre-analytical and analytical variables affecting the measurement of plasma-derived microparticle tissue factor activity. Thromb Res. 2012;129:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.06.004

109. Vallier L, Bouriche T, Bonifay A, et al. Increasing the sensitivity of the human microvesicle tissue factor activity assay. Thromb Res. 2019;182:64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.07.011

110. Franco C, Lacroix R, Vallier L, et al. A new hybrid immunocapture bioassay with improved reproducibility to measure tissue factor-dependent procoagulant activity of microvesicles from body fluids. Thromb Res. 2020;196:414-424. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.09.020

111. Tesselaar ME, Romijn FP, van der Linden IK, Bertina RM, Osanto S. Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity in cancer patients with and without thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:1421-1423. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03504.x

112. van Doormaal F, Kleinjan A, Berckmans RJ, et al. Coagulation activation and microparticle-associated coagulant activity in cancer patients. An Exploratory Prospective Study. Thromb Haemost. 2012;108:160-165. doi: 10.1160/TH12-02-0099

113. Thaler J, Ay C, Mackman N, et al. Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity, venous thromboembolism and mortality in pancreatic, gastric, colorectal and brain cancer patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:1363-1370. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04754.x

114. Cohen JG, Prendergast E, Geddings JE, et al. Evaluation of venous thrombosis and tissue factor in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.04.021

115. Gezelius E, Flou Kristensen A, Bendahl PO, et al. Coagulation biomarkers and prediction of venous thromboembolism and survival in small cell lung cancer: a sub-study of RASTEN—A randomized trial with low molecular weight heparin. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0207387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207387

116. Gardiner C, Harrison P, Belting M, et al. Extracellular vesicles, tissue factor, cancer and thrombosis—discussion themes of the ISEV 2014 Educational Day. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4:26901. doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.26901

117. Geddings JE, Mackman N. Tumor-derived tissue factor-positive microparticles and venous thrombosis in cancer patients. Blood. 2013;122:1873-1880. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-460139

118. Shindo K, Aishima S, Ohuchida K, et al. Podoplanin expression in cancer-associated fibroblasts enhances tumor progression of invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:168. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-168

119. Gagliano N, Celesti G, Tacchini L, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: characterization in a 3D-cell culture model. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:4466-4483. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4466

120. Payne H, Ponomaryov T, Watson SP, Brill A. Mice with a deficiency in CLEC-2 are protected against deep vein thrombosis. Blood. 2017;129:2013-2020. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-742999

121. Gi T, Kuwahara A, Yamashita A, et al. Histopathological features of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: presence of intrathrombus cancer cells and prothrombotic factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023;43:146-159. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318463

122. Galgano L, Guidetti GF, Torti M, Canobbio I. The controversial role of LPS in platelet activation in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:10900. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810900

123. Kaur S, Kumar S, Momi N, Sasson AR, Batra SK. Mucins in pancreatic cancer and its microenvironment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:607-620. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.120

124. Key NS, Khorana AA. Cancer-associated thrombosis: therapeutic and prophylactic strategies. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:171-17418983497

125. Plantureux L, Mège D, Crescence L, Dignat-George F, Dubois C, Panicot-Dubois L. Impacts of cancer on platelet production, activation and education and mechanisms of cancer-associated thrombosis. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10. doi: 10.3390/cancers10110441

126. Urano T, Suzuki Y, Iwaki T, Sano H, Honkura N, Castellino FJ. Recognition of plasminogen activator inhibitor Type 1 as the primary regulator of fibrinolysis. Curr Drug Targets. 2019;20:1695-1701. doi: 10.2174/1389450120666190715102510

127. Chen N, Ren M, Li R, et al. Bevacizumab promotes venous thromboembolism through the induction of PAI-1 in a mouse xenograft model of human lung carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 2015;14:140. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0418-x

128. Bollen L, Peetermans M, Peeters M, et al. Active PAI-1 as marker for venous thromboembolism: case-control study using a comprehensive panel of PAI-1 and TAFI assays. Thromb Res. 2014;134:1097-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.08.007

129. Kondo S, Sasaki M, Hosoi H, et al. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with pretreated advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2018;9:16883-16890. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24721

130. Lal I, Dittus K, Holmes CE. Platelets, coagulation and fibrinolysis in breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:207. doi: 10.1186/bcr3425

131. Falanga A, Marchetti M, Russo L. The mechanisms of cancer-associated thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2015;135:S8-S11. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(15)50432-5

132. Nasser NJ, Fox J, Agbarya A. Potential mechanisms of cancer-related hypercoagulability. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:566. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030566

133. Wojtukiewicz MZ, Sierko E, Hempel D, Tucker SC, Honn KV. Platelets and cancer angiogenesis nexus. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017;36:249-262. doi: 10.1007/s10555-017-9673-1

134. Falanga A, Russo L, Milesi V, Vignoli A. Mechanisms and risk factors of thrombosis in cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;118:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.08.003

135. Leal AC, Mizurini DM, Gomes T, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes induce the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps: implications for the establishment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06893-7

136. McDonald B, Davis RP, Kim SJ, et al. Platelets and neutrophil extracellular traps collaborate to promote intravascular coagulation during sepsis in mice. Blood. 2017;129:1357-1367. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-741298

137. Martinod K, Wagner DD. Thrombosis: tangled up in NETs. Blood. 2014;123:2768-2776. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-463646

138. Lam FW, Cruz MA, Parikh K, Rumbaut RE. Histones stimulate von Willebrand factor release in vitro and in vivo. Haematologica. 2016;101:e277-e279. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.140632

139. Demers M, Krause DS, Schatzberg D, et al. Cancers predispose neutrophils to release extracellular DNA traps that contribute to cancer-associated thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:13076-13081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200419109

140. Semeraro F, Ammollo CT, Morrissey JH, et al. Extracellular histones promote thrombin generation through platelet-dependent mechanisms: involvement of platelet TLR2 and TLR4. Blood. 2011;118:1952-1961. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-343061

141. Thomas GM, Brill A, Mezouar S, et al. Tissue factor expressed by circulating cancer cell-derived microparticles drastically increases the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in mice. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13:1310-1319. doi: 10.1111/jth.13002

142. Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15880-15885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005743107

143. Petersen LC, Bjørn SE, Nordfang O. Effect of leukocyte proteinases on tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Thromb Haemost. 1992;67:537-541. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1648489

144. Massberg S, Grahl L, von Bruehl ML, et al. Reciprocal coupling of coagulation and innate immunity via neutrophil serine proteases. Nat Med. 2010;16:887-896. doi: 10.1038/nm.2184

145. Alfaro C, Teijeira A, Oñate C, et al. Tumor-produced interleukin-8 attracts human myeloid-derived suppressor cells and elicits extrusion of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:3924-3936. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2463

146. de Andrea CE, Ochoa MC, Villalba-Esparza M, et al. Heterogenous presence of neutrophil extracellular traps in human solid tumours is partially dependent on IL-8. J Pathol. 2021;255:190-201. doi: 10.1002/path.5753

147. Gomes T, Várady CBS, Lourenço AL, et al. IL-1β blockade attenuates thrombosis in a neutrophil extracellular trap-dependent breast cancer model. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2088. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02088

148. Zhang Y, Chandra V, Riquelme Sanchez E, et al. Interleukin-17-induced neutrophil extracellular traps mediate resistance to checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer. J Exp Med. 2020;217:21712. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190354

149. Xiao Y, Cong M, Li J, et al. Cathepsin C promotes breast cancer lung metastasis by modulating neutrophil infiltration and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:423-437e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.12.012

150. Shinde-Jadhav S, Mansure JJ, Rayes RF, et al. Role of neutrophil extracellular traps in radiation resistance of invasive bladder cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2776. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23086-z

151. Herre M, Cedervall J, Mackman N, Olsson AK. Neutrophil extracellular traps in the pathology of cancer and other inflammatory diseases. Physiol Rev. 2023;103:277-312. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00062.2021

152. Yang C, Sun W, Cui W, et al. Procoagulant role of neutrophil extracellular traps in patients with gastric cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:14075-14086

153. Thålin C, Demers M, Blomgren B, et al. NETosis promotes cancer-associated arterial microthrombosis presenting as ischemic stroke with troponin elevation. Thromb Res. 2016;139:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.01.009

154. Oklu R, Sheth RA, Wong KHK, Jahromi AH, Albadawi H. Neutrophil extracellular traps are increased in cancer patients but does not associate with venous thrombosis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:S140-S149. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.08.01

155. Thålin C, Lundström S, Seignez C, et al. Citrullinated histone H3 as a novel prognostic blood marker in patients with advanced cancer. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0191231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191231

156. Thålin C, Aguilera K, Hall NW, et al. Quantification of citrullinated histones: development of an improved assay to reliably quantify nucleosomal H3Cit in human plasma. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:2732-2743. doi: 10.1111/jth.15003

157. Rosell A, Aguilera K, Hisada Y, et al. Prognostic value of circulating markers of neutrophil activation, neutrophil extracellular traps, coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with terminal cancer. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84476-3

158. Cedervall J, Herre M, Dragomir A, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote cancer-associated inflammation and myocardial stress. Oncoimmunology. 2022;11:2049487. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2022.2049487

159. Hayden H, Ibrahim N, Klopf J, et al. ELISA detection of MPO-DNA complexes in human plasma is error-prone and yields limited information on neutrophil extracellular traps formed in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0250265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250265

160. Grilz E, Mauracher LM, Posch F, et al. Citrullinated histone H3, a biomarker for neutrophil extracellular trap formation, predicts the risk of mortality in patients with cancer. Br J Haematol. 2019;186:311-320. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15906

161. Bang OY, Chung JW, Cho YH, et al. Circulating DNAs, a marker of neutrophil extracellular traposis and cancer-related stroke: the OASIS-cancer study. Stroke. 2019;50:2944-2947. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026373

162. Muz B, de la Puente P, Azab F, Azab AK. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia (Auckl). 2015;3:83-92. doi: 10.2147/HP.S93413

163. Di Virgilio F, Adinolfi E. Extracellular purines, purinergic receptors and tumor growth. Oncogene. 2017;36:293-303. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.206

164. Rojas A, Delgado-López F, Perez-Castro R, et al. HMGB1 enhances the protumoral activities of M2 macrophages by a RAGE-dependent mechanism. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:3321-3329. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3940-y

165. Sun HJ, Wu ZY, Nie XW, Bian JS. Role of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: the link between inflammation and hydrogen sulfide. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1568. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01568

166. Tadie JM, Bae HB, Jiang S, et al. HMGB1 promotes neutrophil extracellular trap formation through interactions with toll-like receptor 4. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013;304:L342-L349. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00151.2012

167. Abdel-Razeq H, Mansour A, Abdulelah H, et al. Thromboembolic events in cancer patients on active treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: another look! Thromb J. 2018;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12959-018-0161-9

168. Rangaswamy C, Mailer RK, Englert H, Konrath S, Renné T. The contact system in liver injury. Semin Immunopathol. 2021;43:507-517. doi: 10.1007/s00281-021-00876-7

169. Tawil N, Bassawon R, Rak J. Oncogenes and clotting factors: the emerging role of tumor cell genome and epigenome in cancer-associated thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2019;45:373-384. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1687891

170. Paulsen B, Skille H, Smith EN, et al. Fibrinogen gamma gene rs2066865 and risk of cancer-related venous thromboembolism. Haematologica. 2020;105:1963-1968. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.224279

171. Lyman GH, Bohlke K, Khorana AA, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update 2014. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:654-656. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7351

172. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2016;149:315-352. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026

173. Khorana AA, McCrae KR, Milentijevic D, et al. Current practice patterns and patient persistence with anticoagulant treatments for cancer-associated thrombosis. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2017;1:14-22. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12002

174. Hokusai-VTE Investigators Büller HR, Décousus H, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1406-1415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306638

175. EINSTEIN Investigators Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, et al. Oral Rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2499-2510. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007903

176. Agnelli G, Becattini C, Meyer G, et al. Apixaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1599-1607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915103

177. Raskob GE, van Es N, Verhamme P, et al. Edoxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:615-624. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711948

178. Planquette B, Bertoletti L, Charles-Nelson A, et al. CASTA DIVA trial investigators. Rivaroxaban vs dalteparin in cancer-associated thromboembolism: a randomized trial. Chest. 2022;161:781-790. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.037

179. Young AM, Marshall A, Thirlwall J, et al. Comparison of an oral factor Xa inhibitor with low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism: results of a randomized trial (SELECT-D). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2017-2023. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.8034

180. Frere C, Farge D, Schrag D, Prata PH, Connors JM. Direct oral anticoagulant versus low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: 2022 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01289-1

181. Kraaijpoel N, Di Nisio M, Mulder FI, et al. Clinical impact of bleeding in cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: results from the Hokusai VTE cancer study. Thromb Haemost. 2018;118:1439-1449. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667001

182. Key NS, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:496-520. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01461

183. Lyman GH, Carrier M, Ay C, et al. American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer. Blood Adv. 2021;5:927-974. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003442

184. Falanga A, Ay C, Di Nisio M, et al. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:452-467. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.014

185. Farge D, Frere C, Connors JM, et al. 2022 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, including patients with COVID-19. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:e334-e347. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00160-7

186. Khorana AA, Noble S, Lee AYY, et al. Role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:1891-1894. doi: 10.1111/jth.14219

187. The ESMO, World Congress on Gastrointestinal cancer, Barcelona, Spain, 28 June-1 July 2023. Thrombosis in GI cancer, M Dictato, MD FRCP (Edin), Hematology, Oncology. https://www.eortc.org/event/world-congress-on-gastrointestinal-cancer/

188. Carrier M, Blais N, Crowther M, et al. Treatment algorithm in cancer-associated thrombosis: updated Canadian expert consensus. Curr Oncol. 2021;28:5434-5451. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060453

189. Khorana AA, McCrae KR. Risk stratification strategies for cancer-associated thrombosis: an update. Thromb Res. 2014;133:S35-S38. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(14)50006-0

190. Ay C, Dunkler D, Marosi C, et al. Prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Blood. 2010;116:5377-5382. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-270116

191. Verzeroli C, Giaccherini C, Russo L, et al. Utility of the Khorana and the new-Vienna CATS prediction scores in cancer patients of the HYPERCAN cohort. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;21:1869-1881. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.03.037

192. van Es N, Di Nisio M, Cesarman G, et al. Comparison of risk prediction scores for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a prospective cohort study. Haematologica. 2017;102:1494-1501. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.169060

193. Mahajan A, Brunson A, Adesina O, Keegan THM, Wun T. The incidence of cancer-associated thrombosis is increasing over time. Blood Adv. 2022;6:307-320. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005590

194. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317-1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n

195. Wang TF, Zwicker JI, Ay C, et al. The use of direct oral anticoagulants for primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2019;17:1772-1778. doi: 10.1111/jth.14564

196. Muñoz Martín AJ, Gallardo Díaz E, García Escobar I, et al. SEOM clinical guideline of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2019). Clin Transl Oncol. 2020;22:171-186. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02263-z

197. Amirsadri M, Mousavi S, Karimipour A. The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of the use of enoxaparin compared with heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical inpatients in Iran. Daru. 2019;27:627-634. doi: 10.1007/s40199-019-00292-1

198. Bao Y, Zhao G, Qu S, Xiong T, Yao X, Wu B. A Caprini risk score-based cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin for the thromboprophylaxis of patients after nonorthopedic surgery in a Chinese healthcare setting. Clin Drug Investig. 2020;40:161-171. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00876-4

199. Kimpton M, Kumar S, Wells PS, Coyle D, Carrier M, Thavorn K. Cost-utility analysis of apixaban compared with usual care for primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer. CMAJ. 2021;193:E1551-E1560. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.210523

200. Ryan ES, Havrilesky LJ, Salinaro JR, Davidson BA. Cost-effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17:e1075-e1084. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00783

201. Holmes CE, Ades S, Gilchrist S, et al. Successful model for guideline implementation to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis: venous thromboembolism prevention in the ambulatory cancer clinic. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16:e868-e874. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00697

202. Angelini DE, Khorana AA. Building a CAT clinic—real-world systems approaches to prevention and treatment. Thromb Res. 2021;208:173-175. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.11.010

203. Lustig DB, Rodriguez R, Wells PS. Implementation and validation of a risk stratification method at the Ottawa Hospital to guide thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients at intermediate-high risk for venous thrombosis. Thromb Res. 2015;136:1099-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.08.002

204. Kahale LA, Hakoum MB, Tsolakian IG, et al. Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6:CD006650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006650.pub5.