First-Trimester Preeclampsia Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Quality Improvement Comparison of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidelines vs. Simplified Fetal Medicine Foundation Algorithm.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines versus the mini-combined test for preeclampsia screening at 11-14 weeks of gestation, considering COVID-19 restrictions.
METHODS
This study included women ≥18 years old with singleton pregnancies attending routine antenatal visits between May 1 and September 1, 2021. Data collected included maternal characteristics, medical history, uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) levels. Both NICE and Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) methods were used to classify high and low-risk cases.
RESULTS
The mini-combined method showed 50% sensitivity and 89.9% specificity at a 1:100 cutoff for all preeclampsia cases. An optimal cutoff of 1:165.5 yielded 70.5% sensitivity and 80.9% specificity. NICE's method demonstrated 22.7% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity.
CONCLUSION
The mini-combined screening method using the FMF algorithm outperforms the NICE method in preeclampsia screening. Implementing the full FMF method, including mean arterial pressure (MAP) and placental growth factor (PLGF), is recommended based on superior performance and international literature support.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.