MedElevator
Войти в исследования Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2020
Hydrodissection of the Retro-Sternal Space to Protect the Pericardium During Sternal Cryoablation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Autrusseau Pierre-Alexis, Garnon Julien, Auloge Pierre, Weiss Julia, Dalili Danoob, Caudrelier Jean, Cazzato Roberto Luigi, Koch Guillaume, Gangi Afshin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report the retro-sternal space hydrodissection technique used to displace the heart and the pericardium posteriorly for thermoprotection ahead of sternal cryoablation (CA).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 2015 and March 2020, hydrodissection of the retro-sternal space was performed in 5 consecutive patients (5 female; mean age 55.2 ± 9.3 years, range 41-65) who underwent percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of the sternum. The number of needles required, the implemented approach, volume of injectate to achieve hydrodissection, hydrodissection procedure time, distance between the lesion and the pericardium before and after hydrodissection, distance between the ice-ball and the pericardium, technical success and complications were retrospectively assessed.
RESULTS: Technical success, defined as the completion of a full dual freeze protocol without contact between the ice-ball and the pericardium, was achieved in all cases (5/5, 100%). One to two needles were used to perform hydrodissection via a perpendicular (3/5) or an anterior oblique approach (2/5) and a mean hydrodissection procedure time of 10.4 ± 2.6 min (range 8-14). Minimum distance between the lesion and the pericardium increased from mean 5.8 ± 3.8 mm (range 0-10) before hydrodissection to a mean 22.2 ± 5.8 mm (range 18-32) after, with a mean distance between the final ice-ball and the pericardium of 11.6 ± 8.7 mm (range 7-27). A mean of 198 ± 79.8 mL (range 90-290) of iodinated contrast was injected. There were no immediate, short- or medium-term complication noted.
CONCLUSION: Hydrodissection of the retro-sternal space is a feasible technique for sternal cryoablation in order to protect the pericardium from freezing for sternal cryoablation.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 2015 and March 2020, hydrodissection of the retro-sternal space was performed in 5 consecutive patients (5 female; mean age 55.2 ± 9.3 years, range 41-65) who underwent percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of the sternum. The number of needles required, the implemented approach, volume of injectate to achieve hydrodissection, hydrodissection procedure time, distance between the lesion and the pericardium before and after hydrodissection, distance between the ice-ball and the pericardium, technical success and complications were retrospectively assessed.
RESULTS: Technical success, defined as the completion of a full dual freeze protocol without contact between the ice-ball and the pericardium, was achieved in all cases (5/5, 100%). One to two needles were used to perform hydrodissection via a perpendicular (3/5) or an anterior oblique approach (2/5) and a mean hydrodissection procedure time of 10.4 ± 2.6 min (range 8-14). Minimum distance between the lesion and the pericardium increased from mean 5.8 ± 3.8 mm (range 0-10) before hydrodissection to a mean 22.2 ± 5.8 mm (range 18-32) after, with a mean distance between the final ice-ball and the pericardium of 11.6 ± 8.7 mm (range 7-27). A mean of 198 ± 79.8 mL (range 90-290) of iodinated contrast was injected. There were no immediate, short- or medium-term complication noted.
CONCLUSION: Hydrodissection of the retro-sternal space is a feasible technique for sternal cryoablation in order to protect the pericardium from freezing for sternal cryoablation.