Introduction
In recent years, the use of haploidentical donor cells for the treatment of hematological malignancies has been increasing and has proven effective and safe, especially with the use of PTCY [ 1 , 2 ]. There is limited documentation about haploSCT in MM, but small retrospective studies show this is feasible with relatively low non-relapse mortality (NRM). Results in terms of PFS are however similar to HLA-identical SCT [ 3 – 5 ]. HaploSCT offers an attractive opportunity to introduce natural killer (NK) cell alloreactivity based on a KIR-ligand mismatch. In myeloid malignancies, this NK alloreactivity, in the context of a T cell deplete haploSCT, leads to a decreased relapse rate and improved survival without causing GVHD [ 6 – 8 ]. Unlike in T cell–depleted haploSCT, the benefit of NK cell alloreactivity in T cell replete haploidentical SCT is less clear and the limited number of small-sized studies concerning this effect is not conclusive [ 9 – 12 ]. The differences concerning NK cell alloreactivity in these studies might be due to the disease heterogeneity of the included patients and differences in the conditioning regimen and stem cell source. Some studies point towards a better outcome when bone marrow stem cells were used compared to peripheral blood stem cells, which was shown to correlate with the T cell content of the graft that is higher in peripheral blood stem cell products [ 12 ]. This correlation is in line with reports on the inhibitory effect of T cells on the development of alloreactive NK cells [ 13 ].
There is much evidence to support the role of NK cells in fighting MM [ 14 – 17 ]. It has been proven that therapeutic interventions like lenalidomide and elotuzumab result in increased NK cell–mediated anti-myeloma responses [ 18 , 19 ]. In preclinical studies performed by our research group, we show that NK cells are able to kill MM cells, and this killing is improved in the presence of NK alloreactivity [ 20 , 21 ]. This was shown in vitro as well as in a humanized mouse model. Two small clinical studies also implicated a beneficial role for KIR-ligand mismatch in MM. In one study, the role of administration of alloreactive NK cells before autologous SCT was examined. High remission rates were observed, although they were short-lived [ 22 ]. In another study, the impact of KIR-ligand mismatch in a HLA-identical and mismatched SCT setting was investigated and showed that KIR-ligand mismatch in the graft-versus-host direction was protective for relapse [ 23 ].
The aim of this phase 2 study was to prospectively evaluate if KIR-ligand mismatched haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with PTCY improves PFS in poor-risk MM patients.
Methods
Patients
In this prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial, we recruited poor-risk MM patients aged below 66 years with good clinical performance from hospitals in the Netherlands. Poor risk was defined as high-risk cytogenetics (del17p and/or t (4;14) and/or t (14;16)), or relapse within a year after autologous SCT, or relapse after three or more previous lines of therapy. Furthermore, patients had to be responsive to their last line of therapy, defined as at least partial response according to the International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria [ 24 ]. Another prerequisite of enrolment was the permissiveness to NK alloreactivity and availability of a KIR-ligand mismatched haploidentical family donor. Patients were excluded if donor-specific HLA-antibodies were present.
Donor selection
All patients were transplanted with a KIR-ligand mismatched haploidentical family donor. The opportunity for KIR-ligand mismatched haploBMT was determined by Luminex sequence-specific oligonucleotide hybridization (SSO) typing for the three possible inhibitory KIR-ligands: HLA-C group 1 (ligands for KIR2DL2/3), HLA-C group 2 (ligands for KIR2DL1), and HLA-Bw4 including HLA-A harboring Bw4 motifs as ligands for KIR3DL1 (A*23, A*24, A*32).
In case of an opportunity for KIR-ligand mismatched haploBMT, a KIR-ligand mismatched haploidentical family donor was searched in the wide family tree of the patients. In case a probable KIR-ligand mismatched donor was identified by low resolution, a second blood sample was drawn from this potential donor for confirmation in high resolution, for KIR typing, by low-resolution Luminex SSO assay. Protein expression of the mismatched KIR was confirmed by immune phenotyping of the peripheral blood NK cells for KIR expression as described below.
Immune phenotyping for KIRs during donor selection and NK cell reconstitution
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated by gradient density centrifugation and stained with monoclonal antibodies with specificity for CD3 (SK7, BD), CD56 (B159, BD), NKG2A (Z199, Beckman Coulter), KIR2DL1 (143211, R&D), KIR2DL2/3/S2 (DX27, Miltenyi Biotech), or KIR3DL1 (DX9, Miltenyi Biotech) followed by acquisition of the samples on a BD FACS Canto II machine. Acquired data were analyzed using the Diva software by gating on living CD3- CD56+ lymphocytes followed by analysis of the percentage of positive cells for the individual KIRs.
Conditioning and transplant procedure
Conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 14.5 mg/kg on day - 6 and - 5, fludarabine 30 mg/m 2 from day - 6 to - 2 and 200 cGY total body irradiation at day - 1 in all but one patient that received busulfan instead of cyclophosphamide pre-transplant. Donor bone marrow cells were infused on day 0. Bone marrow cells were used in all but one patient, since they are preferred over peripheral blood stem cells because of a lower risk of acute and chronic GVHD [ 25 , 26 ].
GVHD prophylaxis and supportive care
GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg at day + 3 and + 4. Mycophenolate mofetil was used from day + 5 to + 35. Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/kg was added to this combination from day + 5 to + 180.
To prevent infections, patients received immunoglobulins 0.2 g/kg once every 4 weeks from 1 week before conditioning until the immunosuppressive drugs were stopped. Anti-microbial prophylaxis furthermore consisted of cotrimoxazole and valaciclovir, and during neutropenia, ciprofloxacin and fluconazole were given as selective digestive decontamination.
Study endpoints and statistical analysis
The primary endpoint was PFS at 1.5 years. Since haploBMT is a demanding and costly treatment for the patients, we considered the effect that has to be realized by this procedure needed to be substantial and chose for the PFS goal of 50% in 1.5 years compared to around 25% with conventional alloSCT according to historical data.
To test this hypothesis, Simon’s two-stage design was used. We hypothesized that the 1.5-year PFS will be 50% after haploBMT, while this is a maximum 25% in the hypothetical standard treatment group (conventional alloSCT according to historical data). To demonstrate this difference with a power of 80% and a type 1 error rate, alpha (one-sided) of 0.05%, 24 patients were needed. If 1 or less of the first 9 patients experienced 1.5-year PFS, the relevant predefined positive effect was considered very unlikely and the study would be stopped.
Secondary endpoints were engraftment, bone marrow reconstitution, NK cell reconstitution and repertoire, GVHD, infections, and NRM.
To ensure safety, we build in decision rules to prematurely terminate the study if the NRM at 100 days exceeded a certain percentage that was calculated beforehand based on a modification of the standard 3 + 3 scheme.
Analyses were performed as of April 2020. Pre-transplantation patient characteristics were given as median and range for continuous variables and as frequency and proportion for categorical variables. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. For NRM, relapse, and GVHD, a competing risk framework was used. The analysis was performed with the R software.
Results and discussion
In total, 12 poor-risk patients were included from 3 hospitals in the Netherlands from April 2016 to May 2018 with a follow-up until April 2020 and the median time to follow-up is 30.2 months (range 11.8–44.9 months). Pre-transplantation patient characteristics are described in Table 1 . They were all heavily pre-treated with both proteasome inhibition and immunomodulatory drugs; none of the patients received antibody treatment before inclusion. One patient had known high-risk cytogenetics and three patients showed progression within 12 months after autologous SCT. We excluded one patient for further analysis due to disease progression just before BMT, since this was a predefined exclusion criterion. This patient, however, was transplanted because pre-transplant M-protein levels became available during conditioning therapy. KIR/HLA incompatibility of the different donors is described in Table 2 . Table 1 Patient characteristics Gender, n (%) Male 10 (91) Female 1 (9) Age, median in years (range) 61 (40–66) Response to last therapy, n (%) PR 5 (45) VGPR 5 (45) CR 1 (9) Previous lines of treatment, median (range) 3 (2–7) Previous SCT, n (%) 1x autologous 8 (73) 2x autologous 3 (27) Allogeneic 1 (9) Table 2 Donor and recipient HLA typing and NK mismatch Patient NR. Patient HLA present Patient HLA absent Donor HLA present Donor HLA absent Mismatch iKIR mismatch P1 Bw4, C1 C2 Bw4, C1, C2 X C2 2DL1 P2 C2 Bw4, C1 C1, C2 Bw4 C1 2DL2/2DL3 P3 Bw4, C2 C1 Bw4, C1, C2 x C1 2DL2/2DL3 P4 C1, C2 Bw4 Bw4, C2 C1 Bw4 3DL1 P5 Bw4, C1 C2 C1, C2 Bw4 C2 2DL1 P6 C1 Bw4, C2 Bw4, C1, C2 X C2, Bw4 2DL1/3DL1 P7 Bw4, C1 C2 Bw4, C1, C2 X C2 2DL1 P8 C1, C2 Bw4 Bw4, C1, C2 X Bw4 3DL1 P9 Bw4, C2 C1 Bw4, C1, C2 X C1 2DL2/2DL3 P10 C1 C2,Bw4 Bw4, C1, C2 X C2, Bw4 2DL1/3DL1 P11 C1 C2, Bw4 Bw4, C1, C2 X C2, Bw4 2DL1/3DL1 P12 C1, Bw4 C2 Bw4, C1, C2 x C2 2DL1 HLA human leukocyte antigen, iKIR inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor
Table 1
Patient characteristics
| Gender, n (%) | |
| Male | 10 (91) |
| Female | 1 (9) |
| Age, median in years (range) | 61 (40–66) |
| Response to last therapy, n (%) | |
| PR | 5 (45) |
| VGPR | 5 (45) |
| CR | 1 (9) |
| Previous lines of treatment, median (range) | 3 (2–7) |
| Previous SCT, n (%) | |
| 1x autologous | 8 (73) |
| 2x autologous | 3 (27) |
| Allogeneic | 1 (9) |
Table 2
Donor and recipient HLA typing and NK mismatch
HLA human leukocyte antigen, iKIR inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor
| Patient NR. | Patient HLA present | Patient HLA absent | Donor HLA present | Donor HLA absent | Mismatch | iKIR mismatch |
| P1 | Bw4, C1 | C2 | Bw4, C1, C2 | X | C2 | 2DL1 |
| P2 | C2 | Bw4, C1 | C1, C2 | Bw4 | C1 | 2DL2/2DL3 |
| P3 | Bw4, C2 | C1 | Bw4, C1, C2 | x | C1 | 2DL2/2DL3 |
| P4 | C1, C2 | Bw4 | Bw4, C2 | C1 | Bw4 | 3DL1 |
| P5 | Bw4, C1 | C2 | C1, C2 | Bw4 | C2 | 2DL1 |
| P6 | C1 | Bw4, C2 | Bw4, C1, C2 | X | C2, Bw4 | 2DL1/3DL1 |
| P7 | Bw4, C1 | C2 | Bw4, C1, C2 | X | C2 | 2DL1 |
| P8 | C1, C2 | Bw4 | Bw4, C1, C2 | X | Bw4 | 3DL1 |
| P9 | Bw4, C2 | C1 | Bw4, C1, C2 | X | C1 | 2DL2/2DL3 |
| P10 | C1 | C2,Bw4 | Bw4, C1, C2 | X | C2, Bw4 | 2DL1/3DL1 |
| P11 | C1 | C2, Bw4 | Bw4, C1, C2 | X | C2, Bw4 | 2DL1/3DL1 |
| P12 | C1, Bw4 | C2 | Bw4, C1, C2 | x | C2 | 2DL1 |
Clinical endpoints
Of the 11 evaluable patients, 10 achieved primary engraftment (91%), with a median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment of 18 (12–30 days) and 30 (20–49 days) days, respectively. Grade 2–4 acute GVHD occurred in 2 of 11 patients (none grade 3–4) and chronic GVHD occurred in 4 of 11 patients. Two of the 11 patients died of treatment-related mortality (18%) within the first year.
Of the 9 for the primary endpoint evaluable patients, all patients relapsed within 1 year (Fig. 1a ). The median time to relapse was 90 days (range 30–360 days), and 8 of 9 patients had to eventually start anti-myeloma treatment. The median time for the next treatment was 186 days (range 40–330 days); two-thirds of the patients at first only biochemically relapsed without a need for treatment. Overall survival was 73% after 1 year and 52% after 2 years (Fig. 1b ). Fig. 1 Clinical outcomes after HaploBMT. a Probability of progression-free survival. b Overall survival

Noteworthy is one patient, who relapsed quickly after SCT with an increase of her involved free light chain, displayed a spontaneous decrease 60 days after BMT to pre-transplant levels (Fig. 2 ). During this period, no additional anti-myeloma treatment was started. Only immune-suppressive treatment with mycophenolate mofetil was stopped at day + 35, as per protocol. She did not require any treatment until 400 days after the stem cell transplantation. Interesting is also a second, heavily pre-treated patient that was already progressive at day 40 after SCT, but had a complete remission on daratumumab and has continuous bone marrow–proven remission more than 2 years after stopping this treatment. Fig. 2 Serum-free light-chain response after HaploBMT in one individual patient. Progression 30 days after transplantation and responsive thereafter without treatment

NK cell reconstruction
At day 30, all of the 8 analyzed patients showed NK cell recovery, though with an immature phenotype (NKG2A + , KIR - ). At day 60 in both the peripheral blood and bone marrow, mature NK cells (KIR + ) could be identified (Fig. 3a–d ). We have no data on the functionality of these cells. Fig. 3 a – d Assessment of NK cell phenotype after stem cell transplantation. Mononuclear cells were isolated from peripheral blood (PBL) or bone marrow (BM). To analyze KIR expression in the donor, PBL were harvested before from the donor before transplantation. To determine NK reconstitution upon transplantation, PBL or BM cells were isolated from the patient at 30 (d30) or 60 (d60) days after transplantation. Isolated cells were stained and the percentage of CD3-CD56+ NK cells expressing KIR2DL1, KIR2DL2/3, KIR3DL1, or NKG2A was determined by flow cytometry. Patients and their donors are depicted as P1–P8 in the legend and every dot represents one data point of cells analyzed at day 30 (d30) or day 60 (d60) after transplantation

Discussion
With this study, we tested the safety and the efficacy of a KIR-mismatched haploidentical BMT in high risk MM patients. We observed that the treatment is safe since there was a high engraftment rate, low NRM (18% at 1 year), and no unexpected adverse events. In the only two other retrospective studies concerning haploSCT with PTCY in MM where there was no selection on KIR-mismatch, comparable results were seen with respect to NRM (10–21% in 1.5 to 2 years); however, they had a slightly higher PFS (17–33% in 1.5 to 2 years). In our small study, unfortunately, there is a 1.5-year PFS of 0%. This 1.5-year PFS seems lower than in conventional alloSCT studies. However, the study is underpowered to draw these conclusions, since the study was prematurely terminated due to the defined stopping rules based on a 1.5-year PFS of 50%. Furthermore, this low PFS was also not unexpected since these were heavily pre-treated patients with very high-risk chemo-resistant myelomas. Though these patients showed a biochemical relapse, many of them did not require treatment for a long time after which is very unlikely for this fast progressive patient population. Even though it is difficult to draw conclusions in such a small, heterogenous group of patients, our results show that KIR-ligand mismatch in this patient category is not only harmful but also not more effective than non-matched haploSCT or conventional alloSCT in curing MM [ 3 , 4 ].
We hypothesize that the late reconstitution of functional mature NK cells is responsible for the lack of response. This has already been described in other patient groups after PTCY: within days after SCT, mature graft-derived NK cells appear, but they are rapidly eliminated by PTCY. Full reconstitution of a mature and functional NK cell population took 6 to 12 months [ 12 ]. The median time point of relapse in our patients occurred shortly after transplantation (around 3 months). We detected that 30 days after haploBMSCT, most NK cells still had an immature phenotype without KIR expression and were not able to stop disease progression at this early stage after transplantation when myeloma cell load was still low. We hypothesize that the delayed NK cell reconstitution may be overruled by the infusion of mature, functional donor NK cells shortly after PTCY administration. In myeloid malignancies, this concept has already been used and seems successful in a small group of high-risk patients [ 27 ]. In this context, it may also be helpful to bridge the time to full NK cell restoration after the SCT with additional anti-MM therapy like elotuzumab or daratumumab, or to combine these two modalities. This concept is supported by the patient that showed a long-lasting complete response after temporary treatment with daratumumab. Another option would be to improve NK cell function and thereby increase the alloreactive effect by blocking antibodies, such as monalizumab, a novel checkpoint inhibitor against NKG2a [ 28 ].
In conclusion, in this study, we show that haploidentical BMT in MM patients is safe and feasible in terms of engraftment and late NK cell reconstitution. HaploBMT in MM forms a possible platform for future immunotherapeutic strategies in which the KIR-ligand mismatch might be beneficial. Though this study is limited in patient numbers, none of the patients showed a clinically relevant increase of PFS; therefore, we conclude that in the setting of haploBMT in combination with PTCY, however, a KIR mismatch probably is not clinically relevant.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors thank the patients and their families for participating in the study.
Authorship contributions
C.E., P.B., E.M., L.W., and G.B. contributed to the conception, design, and planning of the study; C.E. and G.G. contributed to the analysis of the data; C.E., P.B., E.M., C.V., and L.W. contributed to the acquisition of the data; C.E., G.G., L.W., and G.B. contributed to the interpretation of the results; G.G. and C.E. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript; and all authors contributed to critically reviewing or revising the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
G. Bos is C.E.O. CiMaas bv, Maastricht, The Netherlands. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Luznik L O'Donnell PV Symons HJ Chen AR Leffell MS Zahurak M Gooley TA Piantadosi S Kaup M Ambinder RF Huff CA Matsui W Bolaños-Meade J Borrello I Powell JD Harrington E Warnock S Flowers M Brodsky RA Sandmaier BM Storb RF Jones RJ Fuchs EJ HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008 14 6 641 650 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.005 18489989 PMC2633246
2. McCurdy SR Kasamon YL Kanakry CG Bolanos-Meade J Tsai HL Showel MM Comparable composite endpoints after HLA-matched and HLA-haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide Haematologica. 2017 102 2 391 400 10.3324/haematol.2016.144139 27846611 PMC5286947
3. Sahebi F Garderet L Kanate AS Eikema DJ Knelange NS Alvelo OFD Koc Y Blaise D Bashir Q Moraleda JM Dreger P Sanchez JF Ciurea S Schouten H Shah NN Verbeek M Rösler W Diez-Martin JL Schoenland S D'Souza A Kröger N Hari P Outcomes of haploidentical transplantation in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: an EBMT/CIBMTR report Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019 25 2 335 342 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.018 30243581 PMC6339830
4. Castagna L Mussetti A Devillier R Dominietto A Marcatti M Milone G Maura F de Philippis C Bruno B Furst S Blaise D Corradini P Montefusco V Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017 23 9 1549 1554 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.05.006 28499937
5. Chen Y Lu J Xu LP Chen H Zhang XH Wang FR Chen YH Wang Y Liu KY Huang XJ Safety and efficacy of haploidentical stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma Bone Marrow Transplant 2018 53 4 507 510 10.1038/s41409-017-0069-1 29330397
6. Ruggeri L Capanni M Urbani E Perruccio K Shlomchik WD Tosti A Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants Science (New York, NY) 2002 295 5562 2097 2100 10.1126/science.1068440 11896281
7. Pende D Marcenaro S Falco M Martini S Bernardo ME Montagna D Romeo E Cognet C Martinetti M Maccario R Mingari MC Vivier E Moretta L Locatelli F Moretta A Anti-leukemia activity of alloreactive NK cells in KIR ligand-mismatched haploidentical HSCT for pediatric patients: evaluation of the functional role of activating KIR and redefinition of inhibitory KIR specificity Blood. 2009 113 13 3119 3129 10.1182/blood-2008-06-164103 18945967
8. Giebel S Locatelli F Lamparelli T Velardi A Davies S Frumento G Maccario R Bonetti F Wojnar J Martinetti M Frassoni F Giorgiani G Bacigalupo A Holowiecki J Survival advantage with KIR ligand incompatibility in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors Blood. 2003 102 3 814 819 10.1182/blood-2003-01-0091 12689936
9. Wanquet A Bramanti S Harbi S Furst S Legrand F Faucher C Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor-ligand mismatch in donor versus recipient direction provides better graft-versus-tumor effect in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic T cell-replete haploidentical transplantation followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2018 24 3 549 554 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.11.042 29247781
10. Bastos-Oreiro M Anguita J Martinez-Laperche C Fernandez L Buces E Navarro A Inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (iKIR) mismatches improve survival after T-cell-repleted haploidentical transplantation Eur J Haematol 2016 96 5 483 491 10.1111/ejh.12616 26133015
11. Willem C Makanga DR Guillaume T Maniangou B Legrand N Gagne K Peterlin P Garnier A Béné MC Cesbron A le Bourgeois A Chevallier P Retière C Impact of KIR/HLA incompatibilities on NK cell reconstitution and clinical outcome after T cell-replete haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide J Immunol 2019 202 7 2141 2152 10.4049/jimmunol.1801489 30787107
12. Russo A Oliveira G Berglund S Greco R Gambacorta V Cieri N Toffalori C Zito L Lorentino F Piemontese S Morelli M Giglio F Assanelli A Stanghellini MTL Bonini C Peccatori J Ciceri F Luznik L Vago L NK cell recovery after haploidentical HSCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide: dynamics and clinical implications Blood. 2018 131 2 247 262 10.1182/blood-2017-05-780668 28986344 PMC5757695
13. Cooley S McCullar V Wangen R Bergemann TL Spellman S Weisdorf DJ Miller JS KIR reconstitution is altered by T cells in the graft and correlates with clinical outcomes after unrelated donor transplantation Blood. 2005 106 13 4370 4376 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1644 16131567 PMC1895239
14. Osterborg A Nilsson B Bjorkholm M Holm G Mellstedt H Natural killer cell activity in monoclonal gammopathies: relation to disease activity Eur J Haematol 1990 45 3 153 157 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1990.tb00443.x 1699786
15. Frohn C Hoppner M Schlenke P Kirchner H Koritke P Luhm J Anti-myeloma activity of natural killer lymphocytes Br J Haematol 2002 119 3 660 664 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03879.x 12437641
16. El-Sherbiny YM Meade JL Holmes TD McGonagle D Mackie SL Morgan AW The requirement for DNAM-1, NKG2D, and NKp46 in the natural killer cell-mediated killing of myeloma cells Cancer Res 2007 67 18 8444 8449 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4230 17875681
17. Carbone E Neri P Mesuraca M Fulciniti MT Otsuki T Pende D Groh V Spies T Pollio G Cosman D Catalano L Tassone P Rotoli B Venuta S HLA class I, NKG2D, and natural cytotoxicity receptors regulate multiple myeloma cell recognition by natural killer cells Blood. 2005 105 1 251 258 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1422 15328155
18. Campbell KS Cohen AD Pazina T Mechanisms of NK cell activation and clinical activity of the therapeutic SLAMF7 antibody, elotuzumab in multiple myeloma Front Immunol 2018 9 2551 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02551 30455698 PMC6230619
19. Giuliani M Janji B Berchem G Activation of NK cells and disruption of PD-L1/PD-1 axis: two different ways for lenalidomide to block myeloma progression Oncotarget. 2017 8 14 24031 24044 10.18632/oncotarget.15234 28199990 PMC5410361
20. Sarkar S Germeraad WT Rouschop KM Steeghs EM van Gelder M Bos GM Hypoxia induced impairment of NK cell cytotoxicity against multiple myeloma can be overcome by IL-2 activation of the NK cells PLoS One 2013 8 5 e64835 10.1371/journal.pone.0064835 23724099 PMC3665801
21. Sarkar S Noort W van Elssen C Groen R van Bloois L van Gelder M Schouten H Tilanus M Germeraad W Wieten L Martens A Bos G Alloreactive Natural Killer cells have anti-tumor capacity against disseminated human multiple myeloma in Rag2-/-γC-/-mice when combined with low dose cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation HSAO J Clin Immunol Immunother 2015 2 008
22. Shi J Tricot G Szmania S Rosen N Garg TK Malaviarachchi PA Moreno A DuPont B Hsu KC Baxter-Lowe LA Cottler-Fox M Shaughnessy Jr JD Barlogie B van Rhee F Infusion of haplo-identical killer immunoglobulin-like receptor ligand mismatched NK cells for relapsed myeloma in the setting of autologous stem cell transplantation Br J Haematol 2008 143 5 641 653 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07340.x 18950462 PMC3602915
23. Kroger N Shaw B Iacobelli S Zabelina T Peggs K Shimoni A Nagler A Binder T Eiermann T Madrigal A Schwerdtfeger R Kiehl M Sayer HG Beyer J Bornhauser M Ayuk F Zander AR Marks DI the Clinical Trial Committee of the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the German Cooperative Transplant Group Comparison between antithymocyte globulin and alemtuzumab and the possible impact of KIR-ligand mismatch after dose-reduced conditioning and unrelated stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma Br J Haematol 2005 129 5 631 643 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05513.x 15916686
24. Kumar S Paiva B Anderson KC Durie B Landgren O Moreau P Munshi N Lonial S Bladé J Mateos MV Dimopoulos M Kastritis E Boccadoro M Orlowski R Goldschmidt H Spencer A Hou J Chng WJ Usmani SZ Zamagni E Shimizu K Jagannath S Johnsen HE Terpos E Reiman A Kyle RA Sonneveld P Richardson PG McCarthy P Ludwig H Chen W Cavo M Harousseau JL Lentzsch S Hillengass J Palumbo A Orfao A Rajkumar SV Miguel JS Avet-Loiseau H International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma Lancet Oncol 2016 17 8 e328 ee46 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6 27511158
25. Nagler A, Dholaria B, Labopin M, Savani BN, Angelucci E, Koc Y et al (2020) Bone marrow versus mobilized peripheral blood stem cell graft in T-cell-replete haploidentical transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 34:2766–2775 10.1038/s41375-020-0850-9 32393841
26. Ruggeri A Labopin M Bacigalupo A Gulbas Z Koc Y Blaise D Bone marrow versus mobilized peripheral blood stem cells in haploidentical transplants using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide Cancer. 2018 124 7 1428 1437 10.1002/cncr.31228 29360162
27. Ciurea SO Schafer JR Bassett R Denman CJ Cao K Willis D Rondon G Chen J Soebbing D Kaur I Gulbis A Ahmed S Rezvani K Shpall EJ Lee DA Champlin RE Phase 1 clinical trial using mbIL21 ex vivo-expanded donor-derived NK cells after haploidentical transplantation Blood. 2017 130 16 1857 1868 10.1182/blood-2017-05-785659 28835441 PMC5649552
28. van Hall T Andre P Horowitz A Ruan DF Borst L Zerbib R Monalizumab: inhibiting the novel immune checkpoint NKG2A J Immunother Cancer 2019 7 1 263 10.1186/s40425-019-0761-3 31623687 PMC6798508