Historical Background
More than 30 years ago, in 1986, Phillips and Lanier dissected and identified the contribution of peripheral blood (PB) natural killer (NK) and T cells to the cytolysis of cancer following lymphokine activation. Pioneering work in the context of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell generation and their clinical application in cancer patients was then conducted in 1991 and 1999 by Schmidt-Wolf and colleagues [ 1 , 2 ].
Both the conduct-depended factor (CD58/lymphocyte function-associated antigen [LFA]-3) and the soluble factor (interleukin [IL]-12) provided by interferon-γ (IFNγ)-activated monocytes were crucial for the in vitro expansion of T-NK cells from PB mononuclear cells [ 3 ]. Further mitogenic signals for T lymphocytes were then applied in vitro by low-dose anti-CD3 antibodies and repetitive interleukin 2 (IL-2) stimulation every 3 to 4 days for a total of 21 days [ 4 ].
The efficacy of CIK cells generated by this protocol, in general, was due to the enrichment of immune cells, namely, T cells, NK cells, and, in particular, T-NK cells, which showed natural non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted cytotoxicity against various cancers, particularly through their interaction between the activating NK cell group receptor (NKG) 2D and its ligands, leading to the secretion of cytokines such as IFNγ [ 5 ]. However, there were additional, at that time unknown, mechanisms considered that CIK cells might use to fight cancer cells.
Current CIK Cell Expansion Protocols
CIK cells can be prepared from autologous (patient’s own) or allogeneic (donor-derived) fresh and cryopreserved leukapheresis material, PB, leukocytapheresis, bone marrow (BM), or cord blood (CB) mononuclear cells in the presence of IFNγ, anti-CD3 antibody, and IL-2. The general culture protocol requires 3 weeks. CIK cells generated according to this protocol are a heterogeneous composition of a majority fraction of CD3 + CD56 − T cells, a minority fraction of CD3 − CD56 + NK cells, and – CIK cell-specific – an increasing number of CD3 + CD56 + T-NK cells, which expands with the duration of the culture. At the end of the differentiation protocol, mature CIK cells typically are almost entirely CD3 + T lymphocytes expressing CD8 and CD56 and displaying an effector memory phenotype.
CIK effector cells, as a pharmacological tool for cancer immunotherapy, have shown potent killing activity via non-MHC-restricted NK-like and T-cell receptor (TCR)-dependent cytotoxicity pathways. In addition to their direct killing activity, CIK cells can also regulate the immune function of innate and adoptive immunity by secreting various cytokines. Hence, CIK cells are an alternative option over conventional T cells known to be safe and associated with low graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and minimal alloreactivity in an allogeneic setting, as demonstrated by different groups [ 6 – 8 ]. In autologous settings, efforts have been made to improve CIK cells’ cytotoxicity, including the combination with dendritic cells (DC), checkpoint inhibitors (CIs), antibodies, chemotherapeutic agents, and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) ( Table 1 ).
Table 1.
Clinical trials on cytokine-induced killer cells
Search performed on July 14, 2024, from the ClinicalTrials.gov using terms allogeneic and autologous cytokine-induced killer cells.
| Study title | NCT number | Condition/target/diseases | Phase | Intervention/experimental design |
| Allogeneic cytokine-induced killer cells | ||||
| Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells as Post-Transplant Immunotherapy Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation | NCT00185757 | Multiple myeloma | Phase 1 | Drug: cytokine-induced killer Cells |
| Blood and marrow transplant (BMT) | CIK cell dose escalation will be performed in cohorts of 3 patients per group. The initial dose utilized will be 1 × 107 expanded cells/kg. Previously, unmanipulated donor lymphocytes administered at this dose did not result in significant GvHD 7. The expansion of the CIK cell population is expected to diminish the T cell subsets responsible for GvHD further reducing the risk of GvHD to recipients. The dose will be increased to 5 × 107 expanded cells/kg and 1 × 108 expanded cells/kg in successive escalations based on no significant infusional toxicity or GvHD in the recipients | |||
| Cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) Cells In Leukemia Patients | NCT01186809 | Hematologic malignancies | Phase 2 | Biological: in vitro expanded cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells |
| Three infusions of donor cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells will be administered according to a dose escalating program, starting 3 weeks after second donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI). cytokine-induced killer administrations will be separated by 3 weeks intervals | ||||
| Other names: patients will be offered cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells | ||||
| Four combinations of escalating cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells infusions will be provided, until the MTD will be defined | ||||
| Combination 1st CIK cells infusion 2nd CIK cells infusion 3rd CIK cells infusion | ||||
| 1 × 106/kg 1 × 106/kg 5 × 106/kg | ||||
| 1 × 106/kg 5 × 106/kg 5 × 106/kg | ||||
| 1 × 106/kg 5 × 106/kg 10 × 106/kg | ||||
| 5 × 106/kg 5 × 106/kg 10 × 106/kg | ||||
| Allogeneic Cytokine-Induced Killer Immunotherapy for Relapse after Allogeneic Marrow Transplant for Hematological Malignancies | NCT00460694 | Acute myeloid leukemia | Phase 1 | Biological: infusion of allogeneic CIK cells infusion of allogeneic CIK cells at graded doses |
| Acute lymphoblastic leukemia | ||||
| Chronic myeloid leukemia | Phase 2 | |||
| 4 more | ||||
| Post T-Plant Infusion of Allogeneic Cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) Cells as Consolidative Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Disorders | NCT01392989 | Neural tube defects | Phase 2 | Drug: CIK cells, standard of care |
| Anemia | Drug: cyclosporine, 5 mg/kg, po | |||
| Leukemia, myeloid | Drug: mycophenolate mofetil, 15 g/kg, oral | |||
| 3 more | Drug: Thymoglobulin, 7.5 mg/kg, IV | |||
| Radiation: total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) | ||||
| CIK Cells in Relapsing Patients with Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes after SCT | NCT02752243 | Myelodysplastic syndromes | Phase 1 | Drug: CIK cells |
| Acute leukemia | Phase 2 | IL-15-activated CIK cells individually generated from PB mononuclear cells of the original stem cell donors | ||
| CIK Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Acute B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Prognostic Impact on Patients with Early CAR-T Cell Dysfunction | NCT06389305 | B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia | Not Applicable | Drug: peripheral blood lymphocytes autologous or allogeneic peripheral blood lymphocytes |
| Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in relapse | ||||
| Refractory acute lymphoid leukemia | Drug: CIK cell autologous or allogeneic cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells | |||
| Sibling and Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Hematologic Malignancies | NCT00186342 | Acute disease | Not Applicable | Experimental: CIK cell |
| Myelodysplastic syndromes | ||||
| Leukemia, myeloid, chronic | The initial dose utilized will be 1 × 107 expanded cells/kg. The dose will be increased to 5 × 107 expanded cells/kg and 1 × 108 expanded cells/kg in successive escalations based on no significant infusional toxicity or GvHD. | |||
| 4 more | ||||
| Allogeneic CAR-CIK-CD19 in Adults/Pediatric B-Cell NHL or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | NCT05869279 | B-cell NHL | Phase 1 | Biological: CAR-CIK-CD19 allogeneic cytokine-induced killer cells transduced with a transposon CD19-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-CIK-CD19) gene |
| CLL | Phase 2 | |||
| Transposon-Manipulated Allogeneic CAR-CIK-CD19 Cells in Pediatric and Adult Patients with r/r ALL Post-HSCT | NCT03389035 | Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in relapse | Phase 1 | Biological: CAR-CIK-CD19 |
| Phase 2 | Allogeneic (donor-derived) cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells transduced with a transposon CD19-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) gene | |||
| Autologous cytokine-Induced killer cells | ||||
| The Adoptive Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors Using Modified Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells | NCT01868490 | Cholangiocarcinoma | Phase 1 | Drug: cytokine-induced killer cells at least 10 × 9 CIK cells, IV on day 0, 14, 28 |
| Phase 2 | ||||
| Maintenance Therapy with Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for No Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | NCT01481259 | Non-small cell lung cancer | Phase 2 | Biological: Autologous cytokine-induced killer cell |
| Subjects receive autologous cytokine-induced killer cell infusion every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity | ||||
| Phase 3 | Other: pemetrexed | |||
| Subjects receive pemetrexed infusion at a dose of 500 mg/m 2 every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity | ||||
| Study of DC-CTL Combined with CIK for Advanced Solid Tumor | NCT03047525 | Colorectal cancer | Phase 1 | Patients in group A will receive 4 cycles of CIK treatments and 4 cycles of DC-CIK treatments within 8 months. Patients in group B will have no immunotherapy. chemotherapy are available in both groups |
| Renal cell carcinoma | ||||
| Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | Phase 2 | |||
| 1 more | ||||
| Lower Dose Decitabine Based Therapy in Patients with Refractory and/or Chemotherapy Resistant Solid Tumors or B-Cell Lymphomas | NCT01799083 | Solid tumors | Phase 1 | Drug: decitabine |
| A continuous 5-day lower dose decitabine transfusion will be performed for patients during each treatment cycle, and autologous cytokine-induced killer cells may be transfused or chemotherapy may be also added | ||||
| B-cell lymphoma | Phase 2 | Biological: cytokine-induced killer cell | ||
| Autologous cytokine-induced killer cells may be used for patients before and after decitabine treatment | ||||
| Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for the Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma | NCT02482454 | Cholangiocarcinoma | Phase 2 | Procedure: radiofrequency ablation |
| Radiofrequency ablation is performed percutaneously under CT/US guidance | ||||
| Phase 3 | Biological: cytokine-induced killer cells | |||
| The patients received autologous cytokine-induced killer cells transfusion 1 week after RFA treatment | ||||
| Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases | NCT02419677 | Colorectal cancer | Phase 2 | Procedure: radiofrequency ablation |
| Radiofrequency ablation is performed percutaneously under CT/US guidance | ||||
| Phase 3 | Biological: cytokine-induced killer cells | |||
| The patients received autologous cytokine-induced killer cells transfusion 1 week after RFA treatment | ||||
| The Study of Apatinib Plus CIK as the Third-Line Therapy for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer | NCT02485015 | Stomach neoplasms | Phase 2 | Drug: apatinib |
| Advanced gastric cancer patients take apatinib 850 mg qd by mouth | ||||
| Biological: cytokine-induced killer cells | ||||
| Cytokine-induced killer cells are used to treat advanced gastric cancer patients with apatinib | ||||
| +Drug: apatinib | ||||
| Advanced gastric cancer patients take apatinib 850 mg qd by mouth | ||||
| Maintenance Therapy with Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for Small Cell Lung Cancer | NCT01592422 | Small cell lung cancer | Phase 2 | Biological: autologous cytokine-induced killer cell |
| Subjects receive autologous cytokine-induced killer cell infusion every month in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity | ||||
| Other: Best Supportive Care | ||||
| Best Supportive Care in the absence of disease progression | ||||
| Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for the Patients with Cervical Cancer | NCT02490748 | Cervical cancer | Phase 2 | No Intervention: RFA alone |
| Procedure: radiofrequency ablation | ||||
| Radiofrequency ablation is performed percutaneously under CT/US guidance | ||||
| Biological: cytokine-induced killer cells | ||||
| The patients received autologous cytokine-induced killer cells transfusion 1 week after RFA treatment | ||||
| The Study of Apatinib plus CIK as the Third-Line Therapy for Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Wild-Type EGFR | NCT02493582 | Adenocarcinoma of lung | Phase 2 | Drug: apatinib |
| Advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR take apatinib 850 mg qd by mouth | ||||
| Biological: cytokine-induced killer cells | ||||
| CIKs are used with apatinib to treat lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR | ||||
| Drug: apatinib | ||||
| Advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR take Apatinib 850 mg qd by mouth | ||||
| Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for the Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma | NCT02487693 | Ovarian carcinoma | Phase 2 | No Intervention: RFA alone |
| Procedure: radiofrequency ablation | ||||
| Radiofrequency ablation is performed percutaneously under CT/US guidance | ||||
| Biological: cytokine-induced killer cells | ||||
| The patients received autologous cytokine-induced killer cells transfusion 1 week after RFA treatment | ||||
| Study of PD-1 Inhibitor Combination with Autologous Cell Immunotherapy in the Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma | NCT03987698 | Renal cell carcinoma | Phase 2 | Biological: SHR-1210 |
| SHR-1210 injection | ||||
| Biological: CIK cells | ||||
| Clear cell renal cell carcinoma | +Biological: SHR-1210 | |||
| SHR-1210 injection | ||||
| Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells Combined Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer | NCT03002831 | Advanced cancer | Phase 2 | Biological: cytokine-induced killer cells |
| +Drug: tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium | ||||
| Drug: tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium | ||||
| Autologous Killer Cell Therapy in Colon Cancer Patients | NCT03329664 | Colon cancer stage IV | Phase 1 | Biological: cytokine-induced killer cell |
| +Other: chemotherapy and/or Radiation Therapy | ||||
| Routine treatments for colon cancer patients according to their stage | ||||
| Phase 2 | Other: chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy | |||
| Routine treatments for colon cancer patients according to their stage | ||||
| Study of Chemotherapy Combination with Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cell Immunotherapy to Treat Lung Cancer | NCT01631357 | Non-small cell lung cancer | Phase 2 | Biological: CIK cell |
| CIK cell injection | ||||
| +Drug: gemcitabine injection | ||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | Phase 3 | +Drug: cisplatin injection | ||
| Drug: gemcitabine injection | ||||
| Drug: cisplatin injection | ||||
| Study of Autologous CIK Cell Immunotherapy Combination with PD-1 Inhibitor and Chemotherapy in the Advanced NSCLC | NCT03987867 | Non-small cell lung cancer | Phase 1 | Biological: CIK cell |
| +Biological: sintilimab injection | ||||
| +Drug: pemetrexed | ||||
| First-line treatment | +Drug: liposome paclitaxel | |||
| +Drug: carboplatin | ||||
| Chemotherapy Combined Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells in Naive Stage IV EGFR Wild-Type Lung Adenocarcinoma | NCT02621333 | Lung adenocarcinoma | Phase 2 | Biological: CIK platinum combined doublets: paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 D1, or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 D1, or pemetrexed disodium 500 mg/m 2 , D1; combined cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 , D1–3 or carboplatin AUC = 5, D1. After 3 or 4 days of chemotherapy, about 5 × 109 autologous cytokine-induced killer cells are transfused into the vein of patients in 1 h |
| Drug: chemotherapy platinum combined doublets: paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 D1, or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 D1, or pemetrexed disodium 500 mg/m 2 , D1; combined cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 , D1–3 or carboplatin AUC = 5, D1 | ||||
| Drug: chemotherapy platinum combined doublets: paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 D1, or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 D1, or pemetrexed disodium 500 mg/m 2 , D1; combined cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 , D1–3 or carboplatin AUC = 5, D1 | ||||
| Treatment of Metastatic Tumors of the Urogenital Area with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells | NCT05108077 | Bladder cancer | Phase 1 | Biological: cytokine-induced killer cells |
| +Other: standard treatment according to the clinical protocols | ||||
| Renal cancer | Phase 2 | Other: standard treatment according to the clinical protocols | ||
| A Study to Evaluate Autologous CIK Cells in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after TACE, PEIT, or RFA | NCT03124498 | Hepatocellular carcinoma | Phase 1 | Biological: CIK cell |
| Phase 2 | ||||
| Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells (CIK) for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients on Standard Drug Therapy | NCT00815321 | Chronic myeloid leukemia | Phase 2 | Biological: autologous CIK cell infusion |
| 4 CIK cells will be infused into patients at regular 3-weekly intervals for 4 infusions. The target cell dose per infusion is 1 × 10e10 CD3 cells. For patients with uncontrolled accelerated or blastic transformation undergoing chemotherapy, this will be given at the nadir of lymphopenia following chemotherapy. For other patients, this will be given without interruption of the ongoing treatment with imatinib or other kinase inhibitor | ||||
| Post-Transplant Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) Cells for Treatment of High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies | NCT00477035 | Leukemia | Phase 1 | Drug: CIK cells, 2 × 10e8 cells/kg |
| Drug: etoposide, 60 mg/kg | ||||
| Drug: BCNU, 15 mg/kg | ||||
| Drug: cyclophosphamide, | ||||
| Multiple myeloma | 100 mg/kg | |||
| Drug: gemcitabine, 1,250 mg/m 2 | ||||
| Drug: vinorelbine, 30 mg/m 2 | ||||
| Drug: melphalan, 200 mg/m 2 | ||||
| Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cell Adoptive Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome | NCT00394381 | Acute myeloid leukemia | Phase 1 | Procedure: infusion of autologous CIK cells: autologous CIK cells will be infused at timed intervals after autologous transplant for AML for group 1 patients, and with or without some cytoreduction treatment for group 2 patients |
| Myelodysplastic syndrome, high grade | Phase 2 | |||
| Study of Adoptive Immunotherapy in Relapsed and Non-Resectable Sarcomas after Multimodal Treatment | NCT04802070 | Sarcoma | Phase 1 | Drug: autologous CIK: lymphocytapheresis of the autologous ex vivo CIK cell expanded in the cell factory (4 dose levels) |
| CIK Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Acute B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Prognostic Impact on Patients with Early CAR-T Cell Dysfunction | NCT06389305 | B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia | Not applicable | Drug: peripheral blood lymphocytes: autologous or allogeneic peripheral blood lymphocytes |
| Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in relapse | ||||
| Refractory acute lymphoid leukemia | Drug: CIK cell: autologous or allogeneic cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells | |||
| CIK Cell Transfusion plus Gefitinib as Second- or Third-Line Treatment for Advanced Adenocarcinoma Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | NCT01871480 | Non-small cell lung cancer | Phase 2 | Drug: group A: cytokine-induced killer cell + gefitinib: CIK cells: intravenous infusions; D14–16; one cycle every month, at least 6 cycles; gefitinib treated with 250 mg for daily oral administration in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity |
| Drug: group B: gefitinib treated with 250 mg for daily oral administration in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity | ||||
| Study of Adoptive Immunotherapy in Relapsed and Non-Resectable Sarcomas after Multimodal Treatment | NCT03782363 | Sarcoma | Phase 1 | Biological: autologous CIK dose level 1: lymphocytapheresis of the autologous ex vivo CIK cell expanded in the cell factory at first level of dose 20,000,000 cell/kgs days 1 and 22 |
| Biological: autologous CIK dose level 2: lymphocytapheresis of the autologous ex vivo CIK cell expanded in the cell factory at first level of dose 25,000,000 cell/kgs days 1 and 22 | ||||
| Biological: autologous CIK dose level 3: lymphocytapheresis of the autologous ex vivo CIK cell expanded in the cell factory at first level of dose 20,000,000 cell/kgs days 1 and 15 | ||||
| Biological: autologous CIK dose level 4: lymphocytapheresis of the autologous ex vivo CIK cell expanded in the cell factory at first level of dose 25,000,000 cell/kgs days 1 and 15 | ||||
| Study of Chemotherapy and PD-1 Inhibitor Combination with Autologous CIK Cell Immunotherapy to Treat Lung Cancer | NCT04836728 | Non-small cell lung cancer metastatic | Phase 2 | Experimental: arm 1 |
| IBI308 intravenous infusion 200 mg d1; pemetrexed intravenous infusion 500 mg/m 2 d2 or albumin paclitaxel intravenous infusion 260 mg/m 2 d2; carboplatin intravenous infusion AUC5 d2; CIK cells, 1 × 10 10 (10 billion), intravenous infusion, d14; Q3W | ||||
| First-line treatment | Active comparator: arm 2 | |||
| IBI308 intravenous infusion 200 mg d1; pemetrexed intravenous infusion 500 mg/m 2 d2 or albumin paclitaxel intravenous infusion 260 mg/m 2 d2; carboplatin intravenous infusion AUC5 d2; | ||||
| Effect of Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for Advanced Malignant Gliomas | NCT02496988 | Cytokine-induced killer cells | Phase 4 | Drug: temozolomide |
| Capsules supplied in 5-mg, 20-mg, 100-mg, 140-mg, 180-mg, and 250-mg strengths; dosed at 200 mg/m 2 /day for 5 consecutive days, repeated every 28 days | ||||
| Advanced malignant gliomas | Biological: CIK | |||
| The patients received autologous cytokine-induced killer cells transfusion 1 week after Temozolomide treatment | ||||
| GC Regimen Chemotherapy plus CIK Cells for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma | NCT01655628 | Stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma | Phase 2 | Drug: GC chemotherapy plus CIK cells (gemcitabine, cisplatin, autologous CIK cells) |
| A total of 40 patients enrolled will be accept 4 cycles GC chemotherapy (every 4 weeks), then they will randomized divided into two groups. 20 patients will maintain autologous CIK cells for 8 cycles (every 4 weeks); the other 20 patients will not accept CIK cells treatment. After all 40 patients have accomplished 4 cycles GC regimen chemotherapy plus CIK cells treatment or 4 cycles GC chemotherapy alone, the early effects will be assessed and long-term efficacy such as OS and PFS will be evaluated | ||||
| Drug: GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine, cisplatin) | ||||
| A total of 40 patients enrolled will be accept 4 cycles GC chemotherapy (every 4 weeks), then they will randomized divided into two groups. Twenty patients will maintain autologous CIK cells for 8 cycles (every 4 weeks); the other 20 patients will not accept CIK cells treatment. After all 40 patients have accomplished 4 cycles GC regimen chemotherapy plus CIK cells treatment or 4 cycles GC chemotherapy alone, the early effects will be assessed and long-term efficacy such as OS and PFS will be evaluated | ||||
| DCs Vaccine Combined with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells in Patients with AML | NCT01898663 | Acute myeloid leukemia | Phase 1 | Biological: adenovirus-transfected DC + CIK |
| Phase 2 | Adenovirus-transfected autologous DC vaccine plus CIK cells | |||
| Effect of Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for Stage I–II Malignant Gliomas | NCT02494804 | Cytokine-induced killer cells | Phase 1 | Drug: temozolomide |
| Capsules supplied in 5-mg, 20-mg, 100-mg, 140-mg, 180-mg, and 250-mg strengths; dosed at 200 mg/m 2 /day for 5 consecutive days, repeated every 28 days | ||||
| Malignant gliomas | Phase 2 | Biological: CIK | ||
| The patients received autologous cytokine-induced killer cells transfusion 1 week after temozolomide treatment | ||||
| DC Vaccine Therapy Combined with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cell in Treating | NCT02487550 | Renal neoplasma | Phase 2 | Biological: DC-CIK, patients with renal cell carcinoma will receive autologous dendritic cells loaded with autologous tumor lysate (dendritic cell vaccine) by venous infusion of CIK cells |
| Biological: IL-2/IFN-α, patients with renal cell carcinoma will receive IL-2/IFN-α by venous infusion | ||||
| DC-CIK in Combination with Chemotherapy (Gio/Oxaliplatin or Cisplatin) versus First-Line Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma Randomized Controlled Phase II Clinical Study of Treatment | NCT02504229 | Gastric cancer | Phase 2 | Biological: autologous dendritic cells co-cultured with cytokine-induced killer cells |
| Drug: gimeracil and oteracil potassium capsules | ||||
| Drug: oxaliplatin | ||||
| Drug: gimeracil and oteracil potassium capsules | ||||
| Drug: oxaliplatin | ||||
| DC Vaccine Therapy Combined with Cytokine-Induced Killer Cell in Treating Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma | NCT00862303 | Renal cell carcinoma | Phase 1 | Drug: IL-2/IFN-α |
| Patients receive treatment of IL-2 or IFN-α | ||||
| Phase 2 | Biological: DC-CIK | |||
| Patients receive autologous dendritic cells (DC) loaded with autologous tumor lysate (DC vaccine) by endemic injection and infusion of CIK cells | ||||
| DC Vaccine Combined with CIK Cells in Patients with SCLC | NCT02688673 | Small cell lung cancer | Phase 1 | Biological: adenovirus-transfected autologous DC vaccine plus CIK cells |
| Phase 2 | ||||
| DC Vaccine Combined with CIK Cells in Patients with Esophagus Cancer | NCT02693236 | Esophagus cancer | Phase 1 | Biological: adenovirus-transfected autologous DC vaccine plus CIK cells |
| Phase 2 | ||||
| CIK Cell Transfusion plus Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage IB–IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | NCT01533727 | Non-small cell lung cancer | Phase 2 | Drug: autologous CIK transfusion plus chemotherapy vinorelbine 25–30 mg/m 2 d1, d8 q3w; DDP 75 mg/m 2 d1 q3w; pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 d1 q3w; carboplatin AUC 5/6 q3w; CIK infusion D14 q3w |
| Drug: chemotherapy alone vinorelbine 25–30 mg/m 2 d1, d8 q3w; DDP 75 mg/m 2 d1 q3w; pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 d1 q3w; carboplatin AUC 5/6 q3w; | ||||
| Anti-PD-1 Alone or Combined with Autologous Cell Therapy in Advanced NSCLC | NCT03360630 | Lung cancer | Phase 1 | Biological: anti-PD-1 plus DC-CIK |
| Patients will receive pembrolizumab 100 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. DC-CIK immunotherapy: mononuclear cells were collected aseptically with blood cell separator composition apheresis and cultured DC-CIK cells for 10–14 days. Cells were infused back to the patients in 3 times via intravenous infusion. Patients will received at least 2 cycles of DC-CIK immunotherapy along with 4 dosage of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. If the evaluation of the treatment is partial response or stable disease, additional cycles were eligible | ||||
| Neoplasms | Phase 2 | Biological: anti-PD-1 alone | ||
| Patients will receive pembrolizumab 100 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal | ||||
| Clinical Study of DC-CIK Cells as a Post-Remission Treatment for Malignant Tumors | NCT04292769 | Malignant neoplasm | Phase 3 | Drug: decitabine |
| Decitabine 10 mg/d, intravenous administration d5 | ||||
| ∼ d1 | ||||
| Biological: DC-CIK | ||||
| +Autologous DC-CIK cell infusion: the first course: d1–d3, the second course: d14–d16; the total number of cells is about 5–10 × 10 9 | ||||
| Biological: DC-CIK | ||||
| Autologous DC-CIK cell infusion: the first course: d1–d3, the second course: d14–d16; the total number of cells is about 5–10 × 10 9 | ||||
| Neoantigen-Expanded Autologous Immune Cell Therapy | NCT05020119 | Advanced solid tumor | Phase 1 | Drug: neoantigen-expanded cell therapy |
| Infusion of personalized neoantigen-expanded T (CIK) cells | ||||
| A Study of Combinations of D-CIK Immunotherapy and Anti-PD-1 in Refractory Solid Tumors | NCT02886897 | Hepatocellular carcinoma | Phase 1 | Biological: D-CIK and anti-PD-1 antibody |
| Renal cell carcinoma | ||||
| Bladder cancer | Phase 2 | Autologous dendritic and cytokine-induced killer cells (D-CIK) (1.0–1.5 × 10 10 cells) were incubated with anti-PD-1 antibody and infused into participants | ||
| 3 more | ||||
| DC Vaccine Combined with CIK Cells in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma | NCT01924156 | Renal cell carcinoma | Phase 1 | Biological: adenovirus-transfected DC + CIK adenovirus-transfected DC vaccine plus CIK cells |
| Phase 2 | ||||
| Study of S-1 plus DC-CIK for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer | NCT01783951 | Gastric cancer | Phase 1 | Biological: DC-CIK |
| Patients will be receive DC-CIK cell therapy at days 15, 17, and 19 per cycle and received cycles of treatment once every 21 days | ||||
| Drug: S-1 | ||||
| The dose of S-1 is determined according to the body surface area as follows: <1.25 m 2 , 40 mg; 1.25 to <1.5 m 2 , 50 mg; and ≥1.5 m 2 , 60 mg, given twice daily after meals for 14 days followed by 7 days rest | ||||
| Drug: cisplatin | ||||
| Phase 2 | Cisplatin is administered at 75 mg/m 2 intravenously over 1–3 h every 21 days | |||
| Drug: S-1 | ||||
| The dose of S-1 is determined according to the body surface area as follows: <1.25 m 2 , 40 mg; 1.25 to <1.5 m 2 , 50 mg; and ≥1.5 m 2 , 60 mg, given twice daily after meals for 14 days followed by 7 days rest | ||||
| Drug: cisplatin | ||||
| Cisplatin is administered at 75 mg/m 2 intravenously over 1–3 h every 21 days | ||||
| Study of Autologous Tumor Lysate-Pulsed D-CIK Combined with Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer | NCT02215837 | Gastric cancer | Phase 2 | Drug: chemotherapy |
| Neoplasms | Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 IV over 2 h, day 1; leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 IV over 2 h, day 1; 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1,200 mg/m 2 /day for 2 days IV continuous infusion; repeat every 2 weeks | |||
| Gastrointestinal neoplasms | Drug: chemotherapy | |||
| 2 more | Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 IV over 2 h, day 1; leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 IV over 2 h, day 1; 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1,200 mg/m 2 /day for 2 days IV continuous infusion; repeat every 2 weeks | |||
| +Biological: Ag-D-CIK | ||||
| 8 × 10 9 autologous tumor lysate-pulsed D-CIK cells for each infusion, IV (in the vein) for 3 cycles, each cycle received four infusions on day 14, 16, 30, and 32 | ||||
| Autologous CIK Cells Infusion for the Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study | NCT01498055 | Lung cancer | ||
| A Study of Anti-PD-1 Combinations of D-CIK Immunotherapy and Axitinib in Advanced Renal Carcinoma | NCT03736330 | Renal cancer metastatic | Phase 2 | Biological: combinations treatment |
| Autologous dendritic and cytokine-induced killer cells (D-CIK) (1.0–1.5 ×10 10 cells) were incubated with low-dose anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (Merck & Co., Inc.) and were transferred to participants via intravenous infusion | ||||
| Hyperthermia Combined with Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Abdominal and Pelvic Malignancies or Metastases | NCT03757858 | Cancer | Phase 1 | Device: Thermotron RF-8 |
| Abdominal cancer | Biological: adoptive cellular immunotherapy | |||
| Pelvic cancer | Phase 2 | Drug: Anti-PD-1 antibody | ||
| 3 more | 1 more | |||
| Anti-PD-1 Alone or Combined with Autologous DC-CIK Cell Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors | Neoplasms | Phase 1 | Biological: anti-PD-1 plus DC-CIK | |
| Phase 2 | Anti-PD-1 antibody treatment: patients will receive pembrolizumab 100 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal | |||
| DC-CIK immunotherapy: mononuclear cells were collected aseptically with blood cell separator composition apheresis and cultured DC-CIK cells for 10–14 days. Cells were infused back to the patients in 3 times via intravenous infusion. Patients will received at least 2 cycles of DC-CIK immunotherapy along with 4 dosage of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. If the evaluation of the treatment is partial response or stable disease, additional cycles were eligible | ||||
| Biological: anti-PD-1 alone | ||||
| Anti-PD-1 antibody treatment: patients will receive pembrolizumab 100 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal | ||||
| Adoptive Cell Therapy plus Chemotherapy and Radiation after Surgery in Treating Patients with Colorectal Cancer | NCT02202928 | Colorectal cancer | Phase 2 | Radiation: radiotherapy |
| Neoplasms | 45∼50 Gy in 25–28 fractions | |||
| Intestinal neoplasms | Drug: chemotherapy | |||
| 2 more | Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 IV over 2 h, day 1; leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 IV over 2 h, day 1; 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m 2 /day for 2 days IV continuous infusion; repeat every 2 weeks | |||
| Biological: DC-CIK | ||||
| 8 × 10 9 autologous tumor lysate-pulsed DC-CIK cells for each infusion, IV (in the vein) for four cycles, each cycle received four infusions with a 1-day interval | ||||
| Radiation: radiotherapy | ||||
| 45∼50 Gy in 25–28 fractions | ||||
| Drug: chemotherapy | ||||
| Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 IV over 2 h, day 1; leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 IV over 2 h, day 1; 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 IV bolus on day 1, then 1,200 mg/m 2 /day for 2 days IV continuous infusion; repeat every 2 weeks | ||||
| Autologous Tumor Tissue Antigen-Sensitized DC-CIK Cells Combined with Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer | NCT02644863 | Esophageal neoplasms | Phase 2 | Drug: paclitaxel |
| Neoplasms | Biological: DC-CIK | |||
| Digestive system neoplasms | Drug: cisplatin | |||
| 1 more | ||||
| Combination of Immunotherapy and Hyperthermia in Advanced Malignant Mesothelioma | NCT03393858 | Cancer | Phase 1 | Drug: anti-PD-1 antibody |
| Patients will receive pembrolizumab 100 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal | ||||
| Biological: DC-CIK immunotherapy | ||||
| Mesothelioma, malignant | Phase 2 | Mononuclear cells were collected from 50 mL peripheral blood and cultured DC-CIK cells for 15–20 days. Cells were infused back to the patients in 3 times via intravenous infusion. Patients will received at least 2 cycles of DC-CIK immunotherapy along with 4 dosage of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. If the evaluation of the treatment is partial response or stable disease, additional cycles were eligible | ||
| Device: Thermotron RF-8EX | ||||
| Hyperthermia for 40 min, with maximum temperature set on 42°C±0.5°C as upper limit, twice a week since the 1st week of pembrolizumab for a total of 10 times |
CIK Cell Expansion to Clinical-Grade Cultures
There is an urgent need to standardize protocols for CIK cell generation to achieve greater acceptance and comparability of this unique therapy. However, a major hurdle, at least in the autologous setting, is the difficulty in generating clinically relevant numbers of highly effective CIK cells from heavily pretreated patients [ 9 ]. New protocols have been reported to decrease regulatory T cells (Tregs) and simultaneously increase the proliferation ability and cytotoxicity of CIK cells. Strategies to further improve the expansion of CIK cells include adding new cytokines to the culture medium such as IL-1α, IL-6, IL-7, IL-12, and IL-21. Lu et al. reported the expansion of highly efficient cytotoxic CIK cells by culturing lymphocytes in the presence of IL-1α [ 10 ]. The addition of IL-6 significantly decreased the number of Tregs, leading to an increased proliferative and cytotoxic capability of CIK cells against hepatocellular carcinoma [ 11 ]. The addition of IL-7 resulted in the upregulation of LFA-1 (CD11a/CD18) and CD28 in CIK cells, which played an important costimulatory role in T-cell activation [ 12 ]. Application of IL-21 increased the expression of IFNγ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, perforin, and granzyme B, thereby enhancing cell cytotoxicity [ 13 ]. Furthermore, thymoglobulin was compared with αCD3 (OKT3) monoclonal antibody (mAb) in clinical-grade culture protocols [ 14 ]. Han and colleagues recently used retronectin for CIK cell activation, resulting in a higher percentage of CD3 + CD4 + cells and CD3 + CD28 + cells compared with conventional types of CIK cells [ 15 ]. Finally, studies with IL-15-activated CIK cells displayed improved proliferation and cytotoxic capacity against hematologic and solid malignancies [ 16 – 21 ].
Considering the urgent need for treatment options for defined patients and to enable sequential and dose-increased CIK cell therapy, we established good manufacturing practice-compliant procedures for the robust generation of fresh and cryopreserved allogeneic ready-for-use therapeutic CIK cell doses within just 10–12 days [ 22 ]. By adding IL-15 instead of IL-2 from day four of culture, cells with a CIK cell phenotype were expanded within 10–12 days. Compared to the 3-week culture system, numbers of T- NK cells were lower, while numbers of CD3 + CD8 + TCR α/β + T cells were higher, potentially associated with increased alloreactive potential. These short-term cell preparations contained a predominant proportion of T cells which showed homing to leukemia sites and complete leukemia control when repeatedly administered in several established mouse models of human leukemia xenografts [ 16 , 23 ]. Our data demonstrated that IL-15 was as effective as IL-2 in promoting cell proliferation and viability. There was no significant alteration in the CIK cell composition. CIK cells generated from cryopreserved unstimulated leukocytapheresis instead of from fresh PB or leukocytapheresis material were associated with limited expansion of NK and T-NK cells in the final product.
As no systematic information on the composition of CIK cells after expansion with different clinical culture protocols can be found in the literature, this information is not included in this review. However, the three aforementioned subgroups of the bulk CIK population could differ depending on donor source material and CIK cell generation protocols, making it difficult to compare this unique therapy.
CIK Cell Mechanisms to Fight Cancer Cells
The dual-functional capability of CIK cells was reported by Pievani et al. [ 24 ], involving both T cell and NK cell-like cytotoxicity mechanisms mediated through the TCR and LFA-1, as well as through NK cell-activating receptors, such as DNAX accessory molecule-1, NKp30, NKp46, and the NKG2D receptor. This results in granule exocytosis, cytokine secretion, and cytotoxicity via apoptosis induction. As T-cell-mediated alloreactivity and NK-like antitumor activity segregate within defined CIK cell subsets, alloreactive subpopulations may consequently be separated before being applied across human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched barriers due to safety concerns [ 25 ].
However, we found that after CD56+ selection or TCRα/β-depletion, antitumor activity was substantially reduced compared with the tested bulk CIK cell population, whereas alloreactivity of CD56+, TCRα/β-, and bulk CIK cells against mismatched PB mononuclear cells or fibroblasts remained low [ 23 ]. Recently, the CD4+ T-cell subset was identified as responsible for killing tumor cells through the phosphorylation of the AKT signaling pathway, secretion of IL-17A, and upregulation of T-box transcription factors T-box expressed in T cells and eomesodermin (T-BET and EOMES). Consequently, the exhausted phenotype (programmed cell death protein [PD]-1+ and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain [TIM]-3+) of CD8+/CD3+CD56+ T-NK cells within the CIK cell population was reduced in the presence of CD4+ T cells, at least in non-small cell lung cancer [ 26 ].
Overall, both autologous and particularly allogeneic bulk CIK cells are capable of a direct TCR-dependent and broad MHC-unrestricted antitumor activity, depending on the raw material as well as the donor- and manufacturing-specific composition of CIK cells. Additionally, CIK cells can indirectly regulate immune responses by secreting various cytokines.
Combinational Treatment Strategies for Enhanced Toxicity
Retargeting CIK cells with mAbs, Fc-engineered mAbs, and bispecific antibodies (bsAb) such as cetuximab [ 27 ], trastuzumab, and human epidermal growth factor receptor (Her)-2xCD3 bsAb enhances the cytotoxicity of CIK cells against various Her2+ cancers, including glioblastoma [ 28 ]. BsAbs against cancer antigen-125 and Her2 significantly enhance the cytotoxicity of CIK cells in primary ovarian cancer [ 29 ]. BsAb epidermal growth factor receptor/CD3 improved cytotoxic activity toward gastric cancer cells [ 30 ] and anti-CD3/anti-CD133 BbsAb against CD133 high pancreatic and hepatic cancer cells [ 31 ].
In terms of hematologic malignancies, the use of anti-CD20 mAbs [ 32 ] increased the expression of components of the mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracellular signal-regulated kinases and signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling pathways [ 33 ]. Blinatumomab (Blina, CD19xCD3) [ 34 ] or bsAb CD19xCD5 (HD37xT5.16) have been reported to increase the cytolytic activity of CIK cells against B-leukemia/lymphoma cells [ 35 ]. Combinational treatment with cell components, such as DC with or without delivering tumor-associated antigen as vaccines, and CIK cells, proved to be safe and effective. This promotes NK cell antitumor effects through direct cell-to-cell contact [ 36 , 37 ], increases the secretion of IL-12 [ 38 ], and decreases the number of Tregs. Adding myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC)-reducing chemotherapy to CIK cell therapy improved survival in patients with metastatic renal and pancreatic cancer [ 39 ].
PD-1, cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3), T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains, and TIM-3 are immune CIs. The blockade of PD-L1/PD-1 augmented CIK cell cytotoxicity against gastric and colorectal cancer cells [ 40 ]. Notably, CIK cells combined with PD-1/PD-1 blockade were effective even in tumors with low or undetectable PD-L1 expression [ 41 ]. This is due to the dynamic and heterogeneous PD-L1 expression within tumors and on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, transmitting activatory and inhibitory signals to the innate and adaptive immune system [ 42 ]. In the tumor microenvironment, this suppresses neighboring T cells even in the absence of PD-L1+ myeloid cells and induces M2-like reprogramming of tumor-associated macrophages, promoting tumor growth and intratumoral immune tolerance. Clinical evidence shows that patients with PD-L1 low or negative tumors still respond to these treatments, indicating that PD-1/PD-L1 blocking therapies may benefit patients with cancers or tumor-infiltrating immune cells with negative or low expression levels of PD-L1 and PD-1 [ 43 , 44 ].
Recently, NK cell engagers, such as bispecific killer cell engagers and trispecific killer cell engagers, retargeting NK cells to tumors cells are being developed for clinical application, which may also benefit CIK cell interventions [ 45 ]. All these suggest that combinational treatment provides novel immunotherapy strategies for cancer treatment, increasing the cytotoxicity of ineffective or less effective autologous CIK cell approaches derived from heavily pretreated patients ( Fig. 1 ; Table 1 ).

Clinical CIK Cell Trials
In the last 3 decades, numerous preclinical evaluations and 158 clinical trials have been conducted, involving more than 5,000 patients and over 30 tumor types treated with CIK cells, including 17 phase III clinical trials ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) [ 46 , 47 ] Updated data, subdivided into allogeneic and autologous applications, are shown in Table 1 . Several advantages of this approach, such as encouraging response rates, acceptable safety profiles, and cost efficiency of CIK cell therapy generated from the cancer patient’s own immune cells, have led to its approval in many countries.
In the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) setting, Introna et al. described interesting applications of donor-derived CIK cells, which were infused in patients with hematological malignancies who relapsed after HSCT [ 6 , 7 , 48 ]. They reported few cases of acute aGvHD (≤ grade II) and chronic (c) GvHD after the infusion of HLA-matched, donor-derived CIK cells. The observed alloreactivity raised concerns about the potential use of CIK cell therapy across major HLA barriers (e.g., in terms of HLA-haploidentical HSCT).
Allogeneic CIK Cells
In the allogeneic setting, it became increasingly evident that starting from allogeneic PB, BM, or CB mononuclear cells, ex vivo activation and expansion in sequential cytokine cocktails reduced potential toxicity, namely, GvHD, of mismatched or matched allogeneic T cells within the heterogenous CIK cell population [ 6 , 7 , 48 – 53 ]. We have recently demonstrated the safety and efficacy of CIK cells as a modified donor lymphocyte product, which we generated by short-term expansion (10–12 days) ex vivo in sequential cytokine cocktails, including IL-15, in several preclinical and clinical studies in adult and pediatric patients transplanted for hematological malignancies [ 16 , 22 , 23 , 54 – 56 ]. Even at 100-times higher doses and in mismatched HSCT settings, these cells – compared to conventional T cells – possessed multiple endogenous antigen-specific antipathogen and presumably nonspecific non-MHC-restricted antitumor reactivity, with negligible risk for GvHD despite rapid T-cell recovery observed in patients. IL-15 activation improved the cytotoxicity of CIK cells by increasing the number of T-NK cells, decreasing the number of Tregs, upregulating Toll-like receptor 4, wingless-related integration site (Wnt) 4, platelet-derived growth factor D, and increased secretion of proinflammatory cytokines like IL-35 [ 17 , 57 ].
Preliminary results of a subsequent early-phase multicenter dose-escalation study confirmed that IL-15 activation improved/shortened CIK cell expansion for clinical applications in patients allografted for hematological malignancies. Sequential infusion of IL-15-activated CIK cells in these patients was safe, with a low incidence of GvHD, and allowed for significantly increased T-cell doses even across HLA-mismatched barriers. Furthermore, CIK cells used in the early posttransplant period improved immune regeneration, particularly T-cell recovery, compared with conventional donor lymphocyte infusions. Durable remission was achieved mostly after treatment of molecular relapse, whereas, IL-15-activated CIK cell therapy in patients with hematological relapse was well tolerated and provided palliation for up to 9 months (manuscript in preparation). Thus, IL-15-activated CIK cells, described as direct killers and modulators of immune responses, can benefit patients who are ineligible for or have failed specific/targeted therapies posttransplant, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. This will be evaluated in an upcoming clinical trial of pediatric AML patients at risk for relapse after allogeneic HSCT.
HSCT Donor-Derived CAR-CIK Cells
Using IL-15-activated CIK cells as “CAR carriers” may further augment specific antitumor activity of the innate and adoptive immune system without increasing risks for posttransplant toxicities. Donor-derived CAR-CIK cell generation may be based on our approved CIK cell manufacturing platform (§4b Abs. 3 AMG, license number: PEI.A.11630.01.1), including the use of IL-15 cytokines as opposed to conventional IL-2, resulting in a higher central/naïve memory phenotype, more fold expansion, and activation when starting from thawed or fresh unstimulated leukapheresis bags [ 22 ]. Lentiviral transduction performed on day two allows for the elimination of the lentiviral particles on day twelve of culture. The refined production process will be tested in an upcoming phase I trial to evaluate the safety of allogeneic anti-CD19-CAR-CIK cell products in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic HSCT.
Engineering CIK cells to express CARs using the nonviral Sleeping Beauty transposon system might have potential advantages over viral systems [ 58 – 60 ], including cost efficiency and safety. In a phase I–IIa dose-finding study evaluating the safety and efficacy of donor-derived anti-CD19-CAR-CIK-products in pediatric and adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapses after allogeneic HSCT ( NCT03389035 ), conducted in collaboration between the Pediatric and Hematology Departments of Monza and Bergamo, Italy, encouraging complete molecular response rates and an excellent safety profile was shown, especially in patients with the highest CAR-CIK cell dose [ 61 ]. Cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were observed in some patients but were manageable. Secondary GvHD never occurred after anti-CD19-CAR-CIK treatment. Additional preclinical studies of this group include a nonviral Sleeping Beauty platform for “off-the-shelf” CAR-CIK cell therapy from CB, as well as dual and armored CARs for selective targeting of AML cells and better homing into the BM niche [ 62 , 63 ]. Ongoing studies using retargeted CIK cells with CARs are whether their therapeutic efficacy is comparable to that of CAR-T cells.
Conclusion
Despite more or less standardized protocols for CIK cell generation, CIK cells are a heterogeneous, mostly donor-dependent population of CD3+T lymphocytes, depending on the raw material as well as the donor- and manufacturing-specific composition of CIK cells. However, this should not be considered as setback but rather the biggest advantage of this approach. As a heterogeneous cell population, CIK cells are able to modulate immune responses and directly kill heterogeneous tumor cells despite immune checkpoint and antigen escape, which are major drawbacks for antibody- or CAR-based immunotherapies [ 64 ].
It is increasingly realized that curing cancer with only one drug or therapeutic strategy is not effective. Hence, the combination of different drugs or therapies has become a standard, or at least a trend, in treating heterogeneous and/or relapsed/refractory cancers. Reviewing preclinical research and clinical trials over the past 30 years in multiple types of cancer, it becomes obvious that adoptive CIK cell therapy is safe but needs an allogeneic component or combination strategy with antibodies, CARs, DCs, MDSC-reducing chemotherapy, immune CIs, NK cell engagers, or epigenetic drugs to defeat high-risk cancer. Furthermore, both autologous and allogeneic CIK cell therapies are most effective on residual cancer cells. Altogether, promising outcomes achieved by adoptive CIK cell therapy and comparison with other therapies will define and guide best-in-class cellular therapies in the future.
Acknowledgments
The author acknowledges the support provided by the Mildred-Scheel-Nachwuchszentrum (MSNZ), Frankfurt am Main, Germany (70113301), and the Parents Association “Hilfe für krebskranke Kinder e.V.,” Frankfurt am Main, Germany (2022_01_COMBAT-AML).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author has nothing to disclose.
Funding Sources
This work was supported by grants from the Mildred-Scheel-Nachwuchszentrum (MSNZ), Frankfurt am Main, Germany (70113301), and the Parents Association “Hilfe für krebskranke Kinder e.V.,” Frankfurt am Main, Germany (2022_01_COMBAT-AML).
References
1. Schmidt-Wolf IG , Negrin RS , Kiem HP , Blume KG , Weissman IL . Use of a SCID mouse/human lymphoma model to evaluate cytokine-induced killer cells with potent antitumor cell activity . J Exp Med . 1991 ; 174 ( 1 ): 139 – 49 . 1711560 10.1084/jem.174.1.139 PMC2118875
2. Schmidt-Wolf IG , Finke S , Trojaneck B , Denkena A , Lefterova P , Schwella N , . Phase I clinical study applying autologous immunological effector cells transfected with the interleukin-2 gene in patients with metastatic renal cancer, colorectal cancer and lymphoma . Br J Cancer . 1999 ; 81 ( 6 ): 1009 – 16 . 10576658 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690800 PMC2362953
3. Lopez RD , Waller EK , Lu PH , Negrin RS . CD58/LFA-3 and IL-12 provided by activated monocytes are critical in the in vitro expansion of CD56+ T cells . Cancer Immunol Immunother . 2001 ; 49 ( 12 ): 629 – 40 . 11258789 10.1007/s002620000148 PMC11036977
4. Anderson PM , Bach FH , Ochoa AC . Augmentation of cell number and LAK activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells activated with anti-CD3 and interleukin-2. Preliminary results in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia and neuroblastoma . Cancer Immunol Immunother . 1988 ; 27 ( 1 ): 82 – 8 . 3260824 10.1007/BF00205763 PMC11038561
5. Schmidt-Wolf IG , Lefterova P , Mehta BA , Fernandez LP , Huhn D , Blume KG , . Phenotypic characterization and identification of effector cells involved in tumor cell recognition of cytokine-induced killer cells . Exp Hematol . 1993 ; 21 ( 13 ): 1673 – 9 . 7694868
6. Introna M , Borleri G , Conti E , Franceschetti M , Barbui AM , Broady R , . Repeated infusions of donor-derived cytokine-induced killer cells in patients relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a phase I study . Haematologica . 2007 ; 92 ( 7 ): 952 – 9 . 17606446 10.3324/haematol.11132
7. Introna M , Lussana F , Algarotti A , Gotti E , Valgardsdottir R , Micò C , . Phase II study of sequential infusion of donor lymphocyte infusion and cytokine-induced killer cells for patients relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation . Biol Blood Marrow Transplant . 2017 ; 23 ( 12 ): 2070 – 8 . 28712935 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.07.005
8. Merker M , Salzmann-Manrique E , Katzki V , Huenecke S , Bremm M , Bakhtiar S , . Clearance of hematologic malignancies by allogeneic cytokine-induced killer cell or donor lymphocyte infusions . Biol Blood Marrow Transplant . 2019 ; 25 ( 7 ): 1281 – 92 . 30878607 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.03.004
9. Sangiolo , D . Cytokine induced killer cells as promising immunotherapy for solid tumors . J Cancer . 2011 ; 2 : 363 – 8 . 21716717 10.7150/jca.2.363 PMC3119405
10. Lu PH , Negrin RS . A novel population of expanded human CD3+CD56+ cells derived from T cells with potent in vivo antitumor activity in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency . J Immunol . 1994 ; 153 ( 4 ): 1687 – 96 . 7519209
11. Lin G , Wang J , Lao X , Wang J , Li L , Li S , . Interleukin-6 inhibits regulatory T cells and improves the proliferation and cytotoxic activity of cytokine-induced killer cells . J Immunother . 2012 ; 35 ( 4 ): 337 – 43 . 22495391 10.1097/CJI.0b013e318255ada3
12. Zoll B , Lefterova P , Csipai M , Finke S , Trojaneck B , Ebert O , . Generation of cytokine-induced killer cells using exogenous interleukin-2, -7 or -12 . Cancer Immunol Immunother . 1998 ; 47 ( 4 ): 221 – 6 . 9875675 10.1007/s002620050524 PMC11037372
13. Gao X , Mi Y , Guo N , Xu H , Xu L , Gou X , . Cytokine-induced killer cells as pharmacological tools for cancer immunotherapy . Front Immunol . 2017 ; 8 : 774 . 28729866 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00774 PMC5498561
14. Bonanno G , Iudicone P , Mariotti A , Procoli A , Pandolfi A , Fioravanti D , . Thymoglobulin, interferon-gamma and interleukin-2 efficiently expand cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) cells in clinical-grade cultures . J Transl Med . 2010 ; 8 : 129 . 21138560 10.1186/1479-5876-8-129 PMC3004824
15. Han L , Shang YM , Song YP , Gao QL . Biological character of RetroNectin activated cytokine-induced killer cells . J Immunol Res . 2016 ; 2016 : 5706814 . 27433478 10.1155/2016/5706814 PMC4940556
16. Rettinger E , Kuçi S , Naumann I , Becker P , Kreyenberg H , Anzaghe M , . The cytotoxic potential of interleukin-15-stimulated cytokine-induced killer cells against leukemia cells . Cytotherapy . 2012 ; 14 ( 1 ): 91 – 103 . 21973023 10.3109/14653249.2011.613931
17. Tao Q , Chen T , Tao L , Wang H , Pan Y , Xiong S , . IL-15 improves the cytotoxicity of cytokine-induced killer cells against leukemia cells by upregulating CD3+CD56+ cells and downregulating regulatory T cells as well as IL-35 . J Immunother . 2013 ; 36 ( 9 ): 462 – 7 . 24145357 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000001
18. Wei C , Wang W , Pang W , Meng M , Jiang L , Xue S , . The CIK cells stimulated with combination of IL-2 and IL-15 provide an improved cytotoxic capacity against human lung adenocarcinoma . Tumour Biol . 2014 ; 35 ( 3 ): 1997 – 2007 . 24104501 10.1007/s13277-013-1265-2
19. Peng Z , Liang W , Li Z , Xu Y , Chen L . Interleukin-15-transferred cytokine-induced killer cells elevated anti-tumor activity in a gastric tumor-bearing nude mice model . Cell Biol Int . 2016 ; 40 ( 2 ): 204 – 13 . 26503216 10.1002/cbin.10553
20. Cappel C , Huenecke S , Suemmerer A , Erben S , Rettinger E , Pfirrmann V , . Cytotoxic potential of IL-15-activated cytokine-induced killer cells against human neuroblastoma cells . Pediatr Blood Cancer . 2016 ; 63 ( 12 ): 2230 – 9 . 27433920 10.1002/pbc.26147
21. Iudicone P , Fioravanti D , Cicchetti E , Zizzari IG , Pandolfi A , Scocchera R , . Interleukin-15 enhances Cytokine Induced Killer (CIK) cytotoxic potential against epithelial cancer cell lines via an innate pathway . Hum Immunol . 2016 ; 77 ( 12 ): 1239 – 47 . 27615504 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.09.003
22. Bremm M , Pfeffermann LM , Cappel C , Katzki V , Erben S , Betz S , . Improving clinical manufacturing of IL-15 activated Cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) cells . Front Immunol . 2019 ; 10 : 1218 . 31214182 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01218 PMC6554420
23. Rettinger E , Kreyenberg H , Merker M , Kuçi S , Willasch A , Bug G , . Immunomagnetic selection or irradiation eliminates alloreactive cells but also reduces anti-tumor potential of cytokine-induced killer cells: implications for unmanipulated cytokine-induced killer cell infusion . Cytotherapy . 2014 ; 16 ( 6 ): 835 – 44 . 24582456 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.01.003
24. Pievani A , Borleri G , Pende D , Moretta L , Rambaldi A , Golay J , . Dual-functional capability of CD3+CD56+ CIK cells, a T-cell subset that acquires NK function and retains TCR-mediated specific cytotoxicity . Blood . 2011 ; 118 ( 12 ): 3301 – 10 . 21821703 10.1182/blood-2011-02-336321
25. Sangiolo D , Martinuzzi E , Todorovic M , Vitaggio K , Vallario A , Jordaney N , . Alloreactivity and anti-tumor activity segregate within two distinct subsets of Cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) cells: implications for their infusion across major HLA barriers . Int Immunol . 2008 ; 20 ( 7 ): 841 – 8 . 18469328 10.1093/intimm/dxn042
26. Liu S , Meng Y , Liu L , Lv Y , Yu W , Liu T , . CD4(+) T cells are required to improve the efficacy of CIK therapy in non-small cell lung cancer . Cell Death Dis . 2022 ; 13 ( 5 ): 441 . 35523765 10.1038/s41419-022-04882-x PMC9076680
27. Sommaggio R , Cappuzzello E , Dalla Pietà A , Tosi A , Palmerini P , Carpanese D , . Adoptive cell therapy of triple negative breast cancer with redirected cytokine-induced killer cells . Oncoimmunology . 2020 ; 9 ( 1 ): 1777046 . 32923140 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1777046 PMC7458615
28. Ma P , He Q , Li W , Li X , Han H , Jin M , . Anti-CD3 x EGFR bispecific antibody redirects cytokine-induced killer cells to glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo . Oncol Rep . 2015 ; 34 ( 5 ): 2567 – 75 . 26323605 10.3892/or.2015.4233
29. Chan JK , Hamilton CA , Cheung MK , Karimi M , Baker J , Gall JM , . Enhanced killing of primary ovarian cancer by retargeting autologous cytokine-induced killer cells with bispecific antibodies: a preclinical study . Clin Cancer Res . 2006 ; 12 ( 6 ): 1859 – 67 . 16551871 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2019
30. Zhang L , Hou Y , Zhang J , Hu J , Zhang K . Cytotoxicity of cytokine-induced killer cells targeted by a bispecific antibody to gastric cancer cells . Oncol Lett . 2013 ; 5 ( 6 ): 1826 – 32 . 23833649 10.3892/ol.2013.1281 PMC3701003
31. Huang J , Li C , Wang Y , Lv H , Guo Y , Dai H , . Cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) cells bound with anti-CD3/anti-CD133 bispecific antibodies target CD133(high) cancer stem cells in vitro and in vivo . Clin Immunol . 2013 ; 149 ( 1 ): 156 – 68 . 23994769 10.1016/j.clim.2013.07.006
32. Dalla Pieta A , Cappuzzello E , Palmerini P , Ventura A , Visentin A , Astori G , . Innovative therapeutic strategy for B-cell malignancies that combines obinutuzumab and cytokine-induced killer cells . J Immunother Cancer . 2021 ; 9 ( 7 ): e002475 . 34272306 10.1136/jitc-2021-002475 PMC8287629
33. Deng QI , Bai X , Lv HR , Xiao X , Zhao MF , Li YM . Anti-CD20 antibody induces the improvement of cytokine-induced killer cell activity via the STAT and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways . Exp Ther Med . 2015 ; 9 ( 4 ): 1215 – 22 . 25780412 10.3892/etm.2015.2264 PMC4353788
34. Fan G , Wang Z , Hao M , Li J . Bispecific antibodies and their applications . J Hematol Oncol . 2015 ; 8 : 130 . 26692321 10.1186/s13045-015-0227-0 PMC4687327
35. Tita-Nwa F , Moldenhauer G , Herbst M , Kleist C , Ho AD , Kornacker M . Cytokine-induced killer cells targeted by the novel bispecific antibody CD19xCD5 (HD37xT5.16) efficiently lyse B-lymphoma cells . Cancer Immunol Immunother . 2007 ; 56 ( 12 ): 1911 – 20 . 17487487 10.1007/s00262-007-0333-0 PMC11029829
36. Fernandez NC , Lozier A , Flament C , Ricciardi-Castagnoli P , Bellet D , Suter M , . Dendritic cells directly trigger NK cell functions: cross-talk relevant in innate anti-tumor immune responses in vivo . Nat Med . 1999 ; 5 ( 4 ): 405 – 11 . 10202929 10.1038/7403
37. Nicol A , Nieda M , Koezuka Y , Porcelli S , Suzuki K , Tadokoro K , . Human invariant valpha24+ natural killer T cells activated by alpha-galactosylceramide (KRN7000) have cytotoxic anti-tumour activity through mechanisms distinct from T cells and natural killer cells . Immunology . 2000 ; 99 ( 2 ): 229 – 34 . 10692041 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00952.x PMC2327139
38. Marten A , Ziske C , Schöttker B , Renoth S , Weineck S , Buttgereit P , . Interactions between dendritic cells and cytokine-induced killer cells lead to an activation of both populations . J Immunother . 2001 ; 24 ( 6 ): 502 – 10 . 11759073 10.1097/00002371-200111000-00007
39. Wang Z , Liu Y , Zhang Y , Shang Y , Gao Q . MDSC-decreasing chemotherapy increases the efficacy of cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and pancreatic cancer . Oncotarget . 2016 ; 7 ( 4 ): 4760 – 9 . 26716894 10.18632/oncotarget.6734 PMC4826241
40. Dai C , Lin F , Geng R , Ge X , Tang W , Chang J , . Implication of combined PD-L1/PD-1 blockade with cytokine-induced killer cells as a synergistic immunotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer . Oncotarget . 2016 ; 7 ( 9 ): 10332 – 44 . 26871284 10.18632/oncotarget.7243 PMC4891123
41. Wang Z , Liu X , Till B , Sun M , Li X , Gao Q . Combination of cytokine-induced killer cells and programmed cell death-1 blockade works synergistically to enhance therapeutic efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer . Front Immunol . 2018 ; 9 : 1513 . 30026742 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01513 PMC6041387
42. Bocanegra A , Blanco E , Fernandez-Hinojal G , Arasanz H , Chocarro L , Zuazo M , . PD-L1 in systemic immunity: unraveling its contribution to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy . Int J Mol Sci . 2020 ; 21 ( 16 ): 5918 . 32824655 10.3390/ijms21165918 PMC7460585
43. Borghaei H , Paz-Ares L , Horn L , Spigel DR , Steins M , Ready NE , . Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer . N Engl J Med . 2015 ; 373 ( 17 ): 1627 – 39 . 26412456 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643 PMC5705936
44. Hamanishi J , Mandai M , Ikeda T , Minami M , Kawaguchi A , Murayama T , . Safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer . J Clin Oncol . 2015 ; 33 ( 34 ): 4015 – 22 . 26351349 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3397
45. Zhang M , Lam KP , Xu S . Natural Killer Cell Engagers (NKCEs): a new frontier in cancer immunotherapy . Front Immunol . 2023 ; 14 : 1207276 . 37638058 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1207276 PMC10450036
46. Zhang Y , Schmidt-Wolf IGH . Ten-year update of the international registry on cytokine-induced killer cells in cancer immunotherapy . J Cell Physiol . 2020 ; 235 ( 12 ): 9291 – 303 . 32484595 10.1002/jcp.29827
47. Sharma A , Schmidt-Wolf IGH . 30 years of CIK cell therapy: recapitulating the key breakthroughs and future perspective . J Exp Clin Cancer Res . 2021 ; 40 ( 1 ): 388 . 34886895 10.1186/s13046-021-02184-2 PMC8662881
48. Introna M , Pievani A , Borleri G , Capelli C , Algarotti A , Micò C , . Feasibility and safety of adoptive immunotherapy with CIK cells after cord blood transplantation . Biol Blood Marrow Transplant . 2010 ; 16 ( 11 ): 1603 – 7 . 20685246 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.05.015
49. Laport GG , Sheehan K , Baker J , Armstrong R , Wong RM , Lowsky R , . Adoptive immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer cells for patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation . Biol Blood Marrow Transplant . 2011 ; 17 ( 11 ): 1679 – 87 . 21664472 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.05.012 PMC3175285
50. Linn YC , Niam M , Chu S , Choong A , Yong HX , Heng KK , . The anti-tumour activity of allogeneic cytokine-induced killer cells in patients who relapse after allogeneic transplant for haematological malignancies . Bone Marrow Transplant . 2012 ; 47 ( 7 ): 957 – 66 . 21986635 10.1038/bmt.2011.202
51. Narayan R , Benjamin JE , Shah O , Tian L , Tate K , Armstrong R , . Donor-derived cytokine-induced killer cell infusion as consolidation after nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation for myeloid neoplasms . Biol Blood Marrow Transplant . 2019 ; 25 ( 7 ): 1293 – 303 . 30951840 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.03.027 PMC6662740
52. Introna M , Franceschetti M , Ciocca A , Borleri G , Conti E , Golay J , . Rapid and massive expansion of cord blood-derived cytokine-induced killer cells: an innovative proposal for the treatment of leukemia relapse after cord blood transplantation . Bone Marrow Transplant . 2006 ; 38 ( 9 ): 621 – 7 . 16980990 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705503
53. Zhang Z , Wang L , Luo Z , Zhao X , Huang J , Li H , . Efficacy and safety of cord blood-derived cytokine-induced killer cells in treatment of patients with malignancies . Cytotherapy . 2015 ; 17 ( 8 ): 1130 – 8 . 25963952 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.04.002
54. Merker M , Salzmann-Manrique E , Katzki V , Huenecke S , Bremm M , Bakhtiar S , . Clearance of hematologic malignancies by allogeneic cytokine-induced killer cell or donor lymphocyte infusions . Biol Blood Marrow Transplant . 2019 ; 25 ( 7 ): 1281 – 92 . 30878607 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.03.004
55. Rettinger E , Bonig H , Wehner S , Lucchini G , Willasch A , Jarisch A , . Feasibility of IL-15-activated cytokine-induced killer cell infusions after haploidentical stem cell transplantation . Bone Marrow Transplant . 2013 ; 48 ( 8 ): 1141 – 3 . 23474803 10.1038/bmt.2013.19
56. Rettinger E , Huenecke S , Bonig H , Merker M , Jarisch A , Soerensen J , . Interleukin-15-activated cytokine-induced killer cells may sustain remission in leukemia patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: feasibility, safety and first insights on efficacy . Haematologica . 2016 ; 101 ( 4 ): e153 – 6 . 26768688 10.3324/haematol.2015.138016 PMC5004389
57. Wang W , Meng M , Zhang Y , Wei C , Xie Y , Jiang L , . Global transcriptome-wide analysis of CIK cells identify distinct roles of IL-2 and IL-15 in acquisition of cytotoxic capacity against tumor . BMC Med Genomics . 2014 ; 7 : 49 . 25108500 10.1186/1755-8794-7-49 PMC4134122
58. Tettamanti S , Marin V , Pizzitola I , Magnani CF , Giordano Attianese GMP , Cribioli E , . Targeting of acute myeloid leukaemia by cytokine-induced killer cells redirected with a novel CD123-specific chimeric antigen receptor . Br J Haematol . 2013 ; 161 ( 3 ): 389 – 401 . 23432359 10.1111/bjh.12282
59. Rambaldi A , Biagi E , Bonini C , Biondi A , Introna M . Cell-based strategies to manage leukemia relapse: efficacy and feasibility of immunotherapy approaches . Leukemia . 2015 ; 29 ( 1 ): 1 – 10 . 24919807 10.1038/leu.2014.189
60. Magnani CF , Mezzanotte C , Cappuzzello C , Bardini M , Tettamanti S , Fazio G , . Preclinical efficacy and safety of CD19CAR cytokine-induced killer cells transfected with sleeping beauty transposon for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia . Hum Gene Ther . 2018 ; 29 ( 5 ): 602 – 13 . 29641322 10.1089/hum.2017.207
61. Magnani CF , Gaipa G , Lussana F , Belotti D , Gritti G , Napolitano S , . Sleeping Beauty-engineered CAR T cells achieve antileukemic activity without severe toxicities . J Clin Invest . 2020 ; 130 ( 11 ): 6021 – 33 . 32780725 10.1172/JCI138473 PMC7598053
62. Perriello VM , Rotiroti MC , Pisani I , Galimberti S , Alberti G , Pianigiani G , . IL-3-zetakine combined with a CD33 costimulatory receptor as a dual CAR approach for safer and selective targeting of AML . Blood Adv . 2023 ; 7 ( 12 ): 2855 – 71 . 36521101 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008762 PMC10300303
63. Biondi M , Tettamanti S , Galimberti S , Cerina B , Tomasoni C , Piazza R , . Selective homing of CAR-CIK cells to the bone marrow niche enhances control of the acute myeloid leukemia burden . Blood . 2023 ; 141 ( 21 ): 2587 – 98 . 36787509 10.1182/blood.2022018330 PMC10646802
64. Priceman SJ , Forman SJ , Brown CE . Smart CARs engineered for cancer immunotherapy . Curr Opin Oncol . 2015 ; 27 ( 6 ): 466 – 74 . 26352543 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000232 PMC4659816