Background
Pompe disease, known as acid maltase deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by Acid Alpha-1,4-Glucosidase (GAA) lysosomal enzyme deficiency. Depending on the age of onset and the type of symptoms, it is categorized into Infantile Onset Pompe Disease (IOPD) and Late-Onset Pompe Disease (LOPD) phenotypes [ 1 ]. Cardiac, respiratory, and limb muscles are commonly the most severely impacted, exerting significant influence on clinical outcomes. The administration of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has been associated with a shift in the disease phenotype. As patients with longer lifespans experience the natural progression of the condition, novel signs and symptoms may emerge that were not previously observed. These may encompass the involvement of both the central and peripheral nervous systems [ 1 , 2 ].
Previous studies have indicated a reduction in skin innervation in the distal lower limbs of patients with LOPD, along with the presence of numerous small glycogen deposits surrounding both myelinated and non-myelinated axons in mice [ 2 – 4 ]. Despite these findings, there has been limited exploration into both small and large fiber neuropathy in individuals with Pompe disease [ 5 , 6 ]. Small fiber neuropathy affects smaller nerve fibers, causing pain, tingling, and sensitivity. Large fiber neuropathy affects larger nerve fibers, leading to weakness, clumsiness, and balance issues ( Fig. 1 ) [ 3 , 7 ].

With the advent of ERT and an increase in life expectancy, attention to less common symptoms such as neuropathy has grown [ 5 ]. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the presence of concomitant sensory neuropathy of undetermined etiology in IOPD and LOPD patients using the Small Fiber Neuropathy Screening List (SFNSL), SUDOSCAN R , Sympathetic Skin Response (SSR) and sensory Nerve Conduction Study (NCS).
Methods
Study design
This case series recruited patients diagnosed with Pompe disease who underwent Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) at a teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran, from March 2021 to December 2021. Inclusion criteria consisted of: (A) meeting at least two of the following criteria: (1) presence of myopathic changes in muscle biopsy with evidence of glycogen deposition, (2) identification of two pathogenic mutations on the GAA gene via PCR sequencing, and (3) abnormal low GAA enzyme activity measured in at least one tissue [ 5 ], and (B) voluntary participation in the study among patients with Pompe disease referred to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department. Among the 31 living patients with Pompe disease registered for treatment in Iran, nine patients were ultimately included in the study following evaluation for exclusion criteria, including a medical history of polyneuropathy risk factors (Table 1 ).
Table 1
Exclusion factors based on diseases and drugs that cause polyneuropathy
HNPP: Hereditary Neuropathy with liability to Pressure Palsy; CMT: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. 1 Excluded by negative familial anamnesis and neurophysiological findings; 2 Excluded by ad hoc blood tests; 3 Excluded by blood test and nutritional status assessment; 4 Excluded by ad hoc serologies; 5 Excluded by anamnesis and ad hoc blood tests; 6 Excluded by ad hoc blood tests, clinical and neurophysiological findings; 7 Excluded by appropriated anamnesis and medical record study; 8 Excluded by anamnesis and blood tests
| Inherited factors 1 | Neoplastic factors 6 |
| HNPP | Monoclonal gammopathy |
| CMT | Primary amyloidosis |
| Metabolic 2 | Multiple myeloma |
| Prediabetes state | Drugs 7 |
| Diabetes | Amiodarone |
| Chronic kidney and liver disease | Chemotherapies (e.g. vincristine and cisplatin) |
| Hypo/hyper-thyroidism | Colchicine |
| Nutritional factors 3 | Hydralazine |
| Vitamin B6 deficiency | Isoniazid |
| Vitamin B12 deficiency | Metronidazole |
| Copper deficiency | Nitrofurantoin |
| Infectious 4 | Nucleosides |
| Hepatitis C | Phenytoin |
| Hepatitis B | Statins |
| Autoimmune disease 5 | Dapsone |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Vitamin B6 |
| Lupus | Toxic 8 |
| Sjögren syndrome | Alcohol |
| Secondary amyloidosis | |
| Sarcoidosis |
Measures
The SFNSL was employed to subjectively assess patients for the presence of Small Fiber Neuropathy (SFN). All documents had been completed by investigator. This questionnaire is often used as a screening tool and can help to identify individuals who may be at risk for or experiencing SFN, and it comprises 21 items, with a total score exceeding 11 indicating a positive screening [ 6 , 8 ]. It typically includes questions about various symptoms associated with SFN, such as pain, numbness, weakness and autonomic dysfunction. Subsequently, NCS were conducted to evaluate large fiber neuropathy based on international clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria. Participants were age-matched to control for potential age-related variations in electrodiagnostic parameters too. Based on the previous research, we have considered the normal range for Sural SNAP latency < 4ms, Sural SNAP amplitude > 10µV, Median SNAP latency < 4.1ms, Median SNAP amplitude > 20µV [ 9 – 13 ]. SSR is defined as the electrical conductivity caused by sweating, showing sympathetic cholinergic function. In this test, a small electrical current is applied to the hand or foot and the nerves response of the sweat glands is measured. This stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, with the normal range in hand between 1.39 and 1.65 s [ 9 ], alongside SUDOSCAN R examinations to evaluate both the peripheral sympathetic autonomic system and SFN [ 14 ]. SUDOSCAN R serves as a non-invasive method for assessing C-fibers function, offering quick and straightforward usability in detecting sweat gland activity in the palms of the hands and feet. During the procedure, participants were instructed to maintain continuous contact with the metal plates of the device for approximately 2 min, refraining from additional movement or vibration [ 15 ].
Ethical considerations
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (approval number: IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1400.068). Informed consent was obtained from all parents, and the patient’s privacy and confidentiality were strictly maintained throughout the study.
Results
The case series included 9 patients (6 males, 3 females) with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD, n = 5) and infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD, n = 4). The patients ranged in age from 2 years to 48 years at the time of study. All patients had initiation of ERT with recombinant human acid α-glucosidase (rhGAA) and most showed subsequent improvement in fatigue and weakness, though the extent of improvement varied.
Genetic analysis revealed pathogenic GAA mutations in 8 of 9 patients, including both previously reported mutations and novel variants. Specific genotypes are detailed in Table 2 .
Table 2
Demographic and clinical data of patients with pompe disease
LOPD: late-Onset Pompe Disease; IOPD: Infantile-Onset Pompe Disease; rhGAA: recombinant human Acid Alpha-Glucosidase, ERT: Enzyme Replacement Therapy; CHF: Congestive Heart Failure; GAA: Acid Alpha-1,4-Glucosidase; DBS: Dried Blood Spot; HGVS: Human Genome Variation Society; N.A: Not Available; PAS: Periodic Acid-Shiff; Alpha-1,4 Glucosidase activity cut-off value > 2. *Abnormal test results
| Patient | Patient #1 | Patient #2 | Patient #3 | Patient #4 | Patient #5 | Patient #6 | Patient #7 | Patient #8 | Patient #9 | |
| Demographic Features | ||||||||||
| Gender/ age (years) | Male/22 | Female/48 | Male/20 | Male/14 | Male/2y.3 m | Female/3 | Male/2 | Male/4y.6 m | Male/2y.6 m | |
| LOPD or IOPD | LOPD | LOPD | LOPD | LOPD | IOPD | IOPD | IOPD | IOPD | IOPD | |
| Underlying diseases | - | Restrictive lung disese | - | - | - | Cardiac hypertrophy | CHF-respiratory disease | CHF | CHF | |
| BMI | 26 | 28 | 24 | 15.5 | 22.4 | 15 | 16.2 | 16.3 | 14.8 | |
| Age of diagnosis (years) | 13y | 28y | 17y | 5y | 10months | 40days | 5months | 2months | 4months | |
| Duration of rhGAA infusion (years) | 7y | 3y | 3y | 7y | 1y | 2y.10 m | 1y.7 m | 4y.4 m | 2y.2 m | |
| Genetic data | ||||||||||
| Consanguineous marriages | Yes | NO | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Ethnicity | Tork (Ghazvin) | Tork (Saveh) | Tork (Hashtrood) | Tork (Hashtrood) | Lor (Lorestan) | Tork (Shiraz) | Tork (Tabriz) | Tat (Ghazvin) | Tork (Tabriz) | |
| Family history | +(brother) | +(sister) | - | - | Both parents heterozygous | - | - | +(cousin) | - | |
| Muscle biopsy results | Severe vacuolar myopathy in the setting of glycogen storage. | myopathic atrophy with type1 fibers predominance, multiple autophagic rimmed vacuoles & slight glycogen excess | Unremarkable skeletal muscle according to histology(routine and histochemical staining) | Severe Vacuolar myopathy with glycogen excess | N.A | N.A | N.A | Severe Vacuolar myopathy with glycogen excess | N.A | |
| GAA gene analysis results (HGVS nomenclature) | No pathogenic mutation was detected | c.[-32-13T > G] | c.[-32-13T > G] | c. [2015G > A]: [2015G > A] | c[576G > C]: [576G > C] | c.[896T > C]; [896T > C] | c. [2078dupA]: [2078dupA] | N.A | c.[896T > C]; [896T > C] | |
| Alpha-1,4 Glucosidase activity | Lower than normal (0.1 umol/L/h) | Lower than normal (0.1 umol/L/h) | Lower than normal (0.1 umol/L/h) | Lower than normal (0.1 umol/L/h) | Borderline | Lower than normal (0.1 umol/L/h) | Lower than normal (0.1 umol/L/h) | Lower than normal (0.1 umol/L/h) | Lower than normal (0.1 umol/L/h) | |
| Second mutation | N.A | [2560 C > T] | [258dupC] | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | |
| Change at the protein level | N.A | Premature stop codon | Frameshift nonsense mutation | p. [Arg672Gln] missense mutation | P. [Glu192Asp] | P[Leu299Pro]: [Leu299Pro] | c.2078dup (p.Ala694GlyfsTer43) | N.A | P[Leu299Pro]: [Leu299Pro] | |
| Clinical Examinations | ||||||||||
| Proximal muscle weakness | MMT = 4/5 | MMT = 4/5 Axial weakness+ | MMT = 4/5 | MMT = 3/5 | MMT = 4/5 Axial weakness+ Laxity+ | MMT = 4/5 | Hypotonia | MMT = 4-/5 Axial weakness+ | Hypotonia | |
| Joint contractures | Genuvalgum Achilles tightness | Achilles tightness | Achilles tightness | Achilles tightness | Achilles tightness/club foot | Achilles tightness | Achilles tightness | Achilles tightness | Achilles tightness | |
| DTR | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ | Absent | Absent | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 1+ |
Seven patients had abnormal small fiber neuropathy screening list (SFNSL) scores indicating possible small fiber involvement. From these patient, one patient had abnormal SSR (patient#1), one patient had abnormal SUDOSCAN R (patient#2) and One patient had sensory axonal neuropathy (patient#5). More comprehensive clinical and genetic data for each patient is provided in Tables 2 and 3 .
Table 3
Clinical data of patients with pompe disease
CK: Creatine Kinas; SNAP: Sensory Nerve Action Potential; N.A: Not Available; SSR: Sympathetic Skin Response; SFNSL: Small Fiber Neuropathy Screening List. *Abnormal test results. $ According to the international clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria, potential age-related variations and normal value of clinic [ 11 – 13 ]
| Patient | Patient #1 | Patient #2 | Patient #3 | Patient #4 | Patient #5 | Patient #6 | Patient #7 | Patient #8 | Patient #9 | |
| Test Results | ||||||||||
| CPK | 2330 | 245 | 722 | N.A | 3340 | 1560 | N.A | 900 | N.A | |
| SUDOSCAN R (hand-feet)(µSi) | 92–93 | 55 − 39* | 69–76 | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | |
| Neuropathy related data | ||||||||||
| SFNSL Score | 13* | 20* | 11* | 9 | 16* | 15* | 19* | 1 | 12* | |
| Sural nerve SNAP latency/ Amplitude $ | 2.5ms/10µV | 2.8ms/14µV | 3.2ms/12µV | 2ms/20µV | 2.1ms/8.1 * µV | 2.1ms/16µV | 2ms/16µV | 2.1ms/17µV | 2.4ms/11µV | |
| Median nerve SNAP latency/Amplitude at wrist $ | 3.4ms/98µV | 3.5ms/64µV | 3.2ms/30µV | 3.2ms/68µV | 2.3ms/17.5 * µV | 2.4ms/79µV | 2.5ms/60µV | 2.3ms/55µV | 2.4ms/67µV | |
| SSR latency (second) | 2.35s* | 0.9s | 1.31s | 1.12s | N.A | 1.02s | N.A | 1.62s | 1.05s |
Discussion
In this case series study, nine patients with Pompe disease, representing approximately 30% of the total 31 registered patients with Pompe disease in Iran, were examined for sensory neuropathy. Among them, seven patients exhibited positive SFNSL scores, while three patients (3/9, approximately 30%) tested positive on at least one electrophysiological test, including SSR, SUDOSCAN R or NCS. Notably, these three patients also had positive SFNSL scores.
Given the significance of deafness as a symptom in Pompe disease patients, comprehensive evaluations of both the peripheral and central nervous systems are warranted [ 16 , 17 ]. Postmortem histopathological studies in patients with Pompe disease have revealed glycogen accumulation in both the central and peripheral nervous systems, including in dorsal root ganglia, anterior horn cells and peripheral nerves [ 18 , 19 ]. Furthermore, studies in mouse models have shown progressive glycogen accumulation within axons and Schwann cells of peripheral nerves starting at an early presymptomatic stage [ 20 , 21 ]. These postmortem and animal model findings provide evidence of underlying peripheral neuropathy pathology in Pompe disease.
In a study by Monteiro et al. in 2019, three out of six LOPD patients, aged 39, 45, and 52 years, were found to have axonal sensory neuropathy [ 5 ]. Additionally, Enax-Krumova et al. in 2022 identified pain as a common symptom of SFN among LOPD patients, with a high frequency of small nerve fiber pathology observed regardless of pain presence, symptom onset, or duration of ERT therapy, necessitating further investigation into the underlying mechanisms [ 2 ]. These findings align with our study, in which three of seven patients exhibited at least one positive electrophysiological test. However, no distinct commonalities were observed among patients with positive electrophysiological tests or between those with positive questionnaires and negative electrophysiological results. Consequently, the complementary test results were incongruent. Given that the SFNSL questionnaire is heavily reliant on pain symptoms and that myopathic pain may not always correlate with small fiber involvement, this could be a contributing factor to the discrepancies.
In contrast to the Monteiro and Enax-Krumova studies, which exclusively evaluated LOPD, our study considered both LOPD and IOPD. Despite this, no significant disparity in neuropathy prevalence was observed between the LOPD and IOPD groups. Given the high prevalence of positive subjective evaluations (SFNSL scores) in approximately 70% of patients and objective electrophysiological findings in approximately 30%, consistent with previous research [ 2 , 5 , 6 ], comprehensive neuropathy screening and evaluation should be a priority for Pompe disease patients.
Given that patients with positive electrophysiological test results also had higher scores on the SFNSL, it appears that this questionnaire demonstrates good validity and screening value for neuropathies. However, it’s worth noting that this questionnaire is primarily designed for SFN screening [ 8 ]. Further investigation into this relationship is warranted, ideally through studies with larger sample sizes. Additionally, it seems that, in the sample of this study, SUDOSCAN R may not have been ideal due to the physical particularities of patients with Pompe disease.
Since all patients exhibit less than 1% enzyme activity, there appears to be no association between enzyme activity levels and neuropathy. Furthermore, it was noted that Iranian patients with Pompe disease exhibit a wide variety of mutations, making it challenging to evaluate neuropathy and determine prevalence based on specific genetic mutations. Consequently, broader studies focusing on enzyme activity and genetic mutations are strongly recommended.
Genetic analysis revealed pathogenic GAA mutations in the majority of patients, including both previously reported mutations and novel variants. For example, patient 2 harbored two heterozygous mutations, with the c.-32-13T > G mutation previously identified in 36–90% of adult-onset GSDII patients [ 22 , 23 ] and the c.2560 C > T nonsense mutation commonly seen in both GSDII and infantile-onset Pompe disease [ 24 – 26 ]. Patient 3 carried the common c.-32-13T > G mutation along with c.258dup , a frameshift variant classified as pathogenic in multiple reports [ 25 , 27 , 28 ]. Patient 4 had homozygous c.2015G > A , described as pathogenic in prior studies [ 29 , 30 ]. Patient 6 possessed homozygous c.896T > C , a known pathogenic variant associated with < 10% of normal GAA activity [ 31 – 33 ]. Lastly, patient 7 had the novel c.2078dup variant, which was recently reported to segregate with disease in a GSDII patient [ 34 ] and is predicted to cause loss of function according to ACMG criteria. Overall, these genetic findings demonstrate the diversity of mutations underlying our cohort of patients with Pompe disease as well as the presence of both common and rare pathogenic variants. Further genotype-phenotype analyses in larger patient samples are needed.
Our study represents a pioneering investigation into sensory neuropathy in both infantile and late-onset Pompe disease, encompassing a broad range of patient ages. However, certain limitations were encountered. Due to logistical constraints and patient refusal, skin biopsies for intraepidermal fiber density quantification and quantitative sensory testing (QST) were not obtained. These procedures are integral components of SFN diagnosis [ 35 ]. Consequently, our conclusions primarily relied mostly on the pain scale and tests that may not fully capture the characteristic features of SFN and neuropathy was indicated by a limited number of laboratory findings. Future studies could address these shortcomings by incorporating intraepidermal small fiber quantification and quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART) [ 36 ]. Additionally, a small sample size resulted from patient physical limitations, geographic distance, the COVID-19 pandemic, and infection concerns. To mitigate these limitations, multicenter studies conducted across various geographical regions are recommended by considering genotype and other relevant factors. Such studies can facilitate a more accurate diagnosis of SFN through a combination of questionnaire assessments and electrodiagnostic studies in the management of patients with Pompe disease (Fig. 1 ). Once SFN is identified, implementing appropriate treatment strategies can greatly enhance patient’s quality of life. Figure 2 summarizes various treatment options that have been proposed for SFN to effectively manage symptoms [ 37 ].

Conclusion
Our findings underscore the importance of recognizing sensory fiber neuropathy as a comorbid condition in patients with Pompe disease. Given the advent of Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) and the consequent increase in life expectancy, timely screening using available methods such as questionnaires, physical exams, or electrodiagnostic studies is crucial for preventing potential debilitating conditions.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
Creatine kinase
Enzyme replacement therapy
Acid alpha-1,4-glucosidase
Infantile-onset pompe disease
Late-onset pompe disease
Recombinant human acid alpha-glucosidase
Small fiber neuropathy
Small fiber neuropathy screening list
Sympathetic skin response
Author contributions
M.B., S.M.R., H.L. and M.B. contributed to the research design. M.R. and M.B. collected clinical samples and performed the experiments. V.Z. analyzed the data. M.R., M.B. and S.D. wrote the manuscript. M.R., M.B. and H.L. gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All the authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (approval number: IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1400.068). Informed consent was obtained from parents and patients, and the patient’s privacy and confidentiality were strictly maintained throughout the study.
Consent for publication
We did not use any identifying images or other personal or clinical details of participants that could compromise their anonymity. Therefore, this item is not applicable to this study. We confirm that all authors listed in the manuscript are aware of the submission and have agreed to submit the paper to this journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
1. F, Fatehi, et al. Recommendations for infantile-onset and late-onset pompe disease: an Iranian Consensus. Front Neurol. 2021;12. 10.3389/fneur.2021.739931.
2. EK, Enax-Krumova, et al. Small fiber involvement is independent from clinical pain in late-onset pompe disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. Dec. 2022;17(1). 10.1186/s13023-022-02327-4.
3. M, Babaee JA, Urtizberea F, Fatehi, Rayegani SM. What is the next step after an Electrodiagnostic Study in Children with polyneuropathies? Rationale for Laboratory and other diagnostic tests. Iran J Child Neurol. 2023;17(4). 10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.43124.
4. LR, DeRuisseau et al. Jun., Neural deficits contribute to respiratory insufficiency in Pompe disease., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2009;106(23):9419–9424. 10.1073/pnas.0902534106
5. M, Lamartine, Remiche G. Late-onset pompe disease associated with polyneuropathy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2019;29(12):968–72. 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.08.016.
6. LD, Hobson-Webb SL, Austin S, Jain LE, Case K, Greene, Kishnani PS. Small-fiber neuropathy in pompe disease: First reported cases and prospective screening of a clinic cohort. Am J Case Rep. 2015;16:196–201. 10.12659/AJCR.893309.
7. LRM, Raasing OJM, Vogels M, Veltkamp CFP, Van Swol, Grutters JC. Current view of diagnosing small Fiber neuropathy. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2021;8:185–207. 10.3233/JND-200490. no. 2.
8. E, Hoitsma J, De Vries, Drent M. The small fiber neuropathy screening list: construction and cross-validation in sarcoidosis. Respir Med. 2011;105(1):95–100. 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.09.014.
9. WD, Spinner. Manual of Nerve Conduction Study and Surface Anatomy for Needle Electromyography, 4th edition., J. Clin. Neuromuscul. Dis., 2007;8(3):170. 10.1097/01.cnd.0000262745.42357.39
10. H, Tankisi, et al. Pathophysiology inferred from electrodiagnostic nerve tests and classification of polyneuropathies. Suggested guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(7):1571–80. 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.003.
11. CS, Ryan EM, Conlee R, Sharma EJ, Sorenson AJ, Boon, Laughlin RS. Nerve conduction normal values for electrodiagnosis in pediatric patients. Muscle Nerve. 2019;60(2). 10.1002/mus.26499.
12. MA, Alexander, Matthews DJ. Pediatric Rehabilitation, Principles and Practice, 4th edition, New York Demos Med. Publ., 2010.
13. MG, Akbari, et al. Normal values of nerve conduction studies in children aged 7 days to 14 years referred to Electrodiagnosis Clinic of Iranian Children’s Medical Center. Iran J Pediatr. 2023;33(5). 10.5812/ijp-137205.
14. P, Novak. Electrochemical skin conductance: a systematic review. Clin Auton Res. 2019;29:17–29. 10.1007/s10286-017-0467-x. no. 1.
15. CM, Casellini HK, Parson MS, Richardson ML, Nevoret, Vinik AI. Sudoscan, a noninvasive tool for detecting diabetic small fiber neuropathy and autonomic dysfunction. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(11):948–53. 10.1089/dia.2013.0129.
16. F, Montagnese, et al. Clinical and molecular aspects of 30 patients with late-onset pompe disease (LOPD): unusual features and response to treatment. J Neurol. 2015;262(4). 10.1007/s00415-015-7664-0.
17. CY, Hsueh, et al. Hearing characteristics of infantile-onset pompe disease after early enzyme-replacement therapy. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1). 10.1186/s13023-021-01817-1.
18. LDM, Pena AD, Proia, Kishnani PS. Postmortem findings and clinical correlates in individuals with infantile-Onset pompe disease, in JIMD Reports, 2015;23.
19. LD, Hobson-Webb AD, Proia BL, Thurberg S, Banugaria SN, Prater, Kishnani PS. Autopsy findings in late-onset pompe disease: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Mol Genet Metab. 2012;106(4). 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.05.007.
20. S, Taverna, et al. Pompe disease: Pathogenesis, molecular genetics and diagnosis. Aging. 2020;12(15). 10.18632/AGING.103794.
21. JA, Lim L, Li, Raben N. Pompe disease: From pathophysiology to therapy and back again, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2014;6 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00177
22. ML, Hule, et al. Aberrant splicing in adult onset glycogen storage disease type II (GSDII): molecular identification of an IVS1 (– 13T→G) mutation in a majority of patients and a novel IVS10 (+ 1GT → CT) mutation. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3(12):2231–6. 10.1093/hmg/3.12.2231.
23. A, Dardis, et al. Functional characterization of the common c.-32-13T > G mutation of GAA gene: identification of potential therapeutic agents. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(2):1291–302. 10.1093/nar/gkt987.
24. M, Castro-Gago J, Eiris-Punal A, Rodriguez-Nunez E, Pintos-Martinez T, Benlloch-Marin, Barros-Angueira F. [Severe form of juvenile type II glycogenosis in a compound-heterozygous boy (Tyr-292–> Cys/Arg-854–>Stop)]. Rev Neurol, 1999;29, 1, .
25. DS, Bali AA, Tolun JL, Goldstein J, Dai, Kishnani PS. Molecular analysis and protein processing in late-onset pompe disease patients with low levels of acid α-glucosidase activity. Muscle Nerve. 2011;43(5):665–70. 10.1002/mus.21933.
26. AJJ, Reuser, et al. GAA variants and phenotypes among 1,079 patients with pompe disease: data from the Pompe Registry. Hum Mutat. 2019;40(11). 10.1002/humu.23878.
27. CE, Beesley AH, Child, Yacoub MH. The identification of five novel mutations in the lysosomal acid a-(1–4) glucosidase gene from patients with glycogen storage disease type II. Mutations in brief 134. Online. Hum Mutat. 1998;11(5). 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1998)11:5%3C413::AID-HUMU16%3E3.0.CO;2-I.
28. ALE, Montalvo, et al. Mutation profile of the GAA gene in 40 Italian patients with late onset glycogen storage disease type II. Hum Mutat. 2006;27(10). 10.1002/humu.20374.
29. YE, Park KH, Park CH, Lee CM, Kim, Kim DS. Two new missense mutations of GAA in late onset glycogen storage disease type II. J Neurol Sci. 2006;251(1–2). 10.1016/j.jns.2006.09.012.
30. C, Angelini AC, Nascimbeni, Fanin M. Autophagy in natural history and after ert in glycogenosis type ii, in JIMD Reports, 2015;21:71–77.
31. KM, Stepien CJ, Hendriksz M, Roberts, Sharma R. Observational clinical study of 22 adult-onset pompe disease patients undergoing enzyme replacement therapy over 5 years. Mol Genet Metab. 2016;117(4). 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.01.013.
32. A, Hahn et al. Outcome of patients with classical infantile pompe disease receiving enzyme replacement therapy in Germany, in JIMD Reports, 2015;20.
33. R, Parini, et al. Long term clinical history of an Italian cohort of infantile onset pompe disease treated with enzyme replacement therapy. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1). 10.1186/s13023-018-0771-0.
34. H, Galehdari M, Emami G, Mohammadian A, Khodadadi S, Azmoon, Baradaran M. Detection the GAA gene in an Iranian child with glycogen storage disease type II. Arch Iran Med, 2013;16, 2.
35. V, Fabry, et al. Which method for diagnosing small Fiber neuropathy? Front Neurol. 2020;11. 10.3389/fneur.2020.00342.
36. P, Thaisetthawatkul JAM, Fernandes Filho, Herrmann DN. Contribution of QSART to the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2013;48(6). 10.1002/mus.23891.
37. M, Geerts JGJ, Hoeijmakers CML, Gorissen-Brouwers CG, Faber, Merkies ISJ. Small fiber neuropathy: a clinical and practical approach. J Nurse Pract. 2023;19(4):104547.
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.