m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025

Combination strategies of gut microbiota in cancer therapy through metabolic reprogramming and immune remodeling.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Wang L, Jiang W, Yang M, Danzeng Q, Liu S, Cui M

Аннотация

Over the past decade, there has been a qualitative improvement in the understanding of gut microbiota in cancer development and treatment. Gut microbiota regulates metabolic reprogramming that occurs in the competition between tumor cells and immune cells for essential nutrients in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Besides, gut microbiota dysbiosis is one of the key factors leading to the formation of aging environment, which has many similarities with the TME. Accumulating research findings have demonstrated that gut microbiota enhances the efficacy of cancer therapies by activating the immune system and facilitating the biotransformation of drugs. Other studies also have shown that specific microbial composition is the effective biomarker of drug resistance and toxicity for cancer treatment. Microbiota-directed therapies are being explored intensively for their potential in cancer prevention and treatment. In this review, we summarize the role of gut microbiota in metabolic reprogramming and immune remodeling; provide an overview of the relationship between gut microbiota and the efficacy, resistance, and toxicity of cancer treatment; propose a series of strategies to integrate gut microbiota into cancer treatment, optimizing antitumor effectiveness and reducing side effects.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Introduction

Gut microbiota consists of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and helminths [ 1 ]. It is susceptible to environmental factors, such as diet, medicine, and lifestyle. An imbalance in gut microbiota disrupts internal environment homeostasis, leading to the rise of various diseases, including cancer. In addition to gut microbiota, the microbial communities in the TME contribute to carcinogenesis. These commensal microbiotas have been demonstrated to maintain a balance between health and carcinogenesis by remodeling immune and inflammatory responses, metabolic processes, as well as mediating cell proliferation and apoptosis [ 2 ].

Microbiota-derived metabolites support cellular energy metabolism and regulate the immune system. Compared to normal cells, tumor cells have unique metabolic characteristics. Metabolic transitions are also carried out by other highly proliferating cells, such as stromal and immune cells [ 3 ]. Tumor cells restrict the metabolism of tumor-infiltrating immune cells through nutrient deprivation, creating an immunosuppressive microenvironment [ 4 ]. Microbiota-derived metabolites are taken up into the bloodstream and then spread all over the body, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [ 5 ], bile acids [ 6 ], amino acids [ 7 ], and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [ 8 ]. These metabolites participate in the cross-talk between tumor cells and immune cells and the regulation of physiology and immune.

With age, the prevalence of cancer increases sharply, peaking at around 85 or 90 years old [ 9 ]. The high incidence of cancer in the elderly is associated with gut microbiota dysbiosis. This alteration promotes the development of chronic inflammation, epigenetic modifications, and mitochondrial structural and functional abnormalities [ 10 ], leading to an immunosenescence environment. Immunosenescence, particularly excessive T cell senescence, ultimately results in a deterioration in immune system function and induces potential tumorigenic process [ 11 ].

Immunotherapy, including oncolytic viruses (OVs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Immunotherapy, as well as traditional radiation and chemotherapy, have yet to reach their full therapeutic potential. The effectiveness of these therapies varies from person to person. Even worse, there are severe adverse effects, and tumor cells exhibit innate or acquired resistance during therapy. Increasing evidence suggests that gut microbiota modulates the efficacy of cancer treatment, particularly immunotherapy. Sivan et al. were the first to propose that oral administration of probiotics significantly enhance the efficacy of ICIs [ 12 ]. Additional experiments by other scientists further show that gut microbiota may influence immunotherapy by stimulating immune cells and increasing the immunogenicity of tumor cells. Bacteroides fragilis , for instance, increases interleukin (IL)−12-dependent T helper 1 (Th1) immune responses by activating dendritic cells (DCs) in lamina propria, reversing anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) non-responsiveness [ 13 ]. Engineered bacteria that express the tail length tape measure protein (TMP) activate the immune system through molecular mimicry, improving clinical outcomes of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy [ 14 ]. Studies conducted both in vitro and in vivo have also demonstrated the potential of modifying gut microbiota to enhance the effects of radiation treatment, chemotherapy, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) [ 15 – 17 ].

Polymeric microbiome technologies, including microbial metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, and metabolomics, now enables researchers to make breakthroughs in comprehending the interactions among gut microbiota, host physiology, immunity, and oncology. Studies have identified specific gut microbial composition is closely related to the toxicity and responsiveness of immunotherapy and radiochemotherapy [ 18 – 20 ].

Altering the composition and the living environment of gut microbiota has been demonstrated to optimize tumor treatment. Microbiota-based therapies, including untargeted therapies (e.g., dietary intervention, probiotics and prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation [FMT]) and targeted techniques (e.g., phage therapy, engineered microbes, nanomedicine-based drug delivery, outer membrane vesicles [OMVs]), hold promise in future treatment. These microbiota-based strategies exhibit potent therapeutic potential by modulating the composition of gut microbiota, activating the immune system, influencing tumor biological behavior, and strengthening the intestinal barrier. For instance, results from a phase II clinical trial have indicated that FMT restored microbiota diversity in patients with PD-1-refractory melanoma and dramatically improved the safety and responsiveness to ICIs [ 21 ]. Some microorganisms have been engineered as immune activators or drug transporters. Yue et al. designed an oral tumor vaccine based on Escherichia coli that released effective OMVs. By overcoming the intestinal barrier and maximizing the intestinal immune response, the tumor vaccination model efficiently eradicated tumor cells [ 22 ].

In this review, we discuss the latest insights into the role of gut microbiota in tumor metabolic reprogramming, the TME and the aging microenvironment remodeling. We also discuss whether gut microbiota can act as an effective adjunct to tumor treatment. Finally, we emphasize the feasibility of both targeted and non-targeted microbiota strategies in cancer therapy.

Gut microbiota and cancer metabolic reprogramming

Tumor cells undergo metabolic reprogramming. They produce metabolic toxins, cause nutrient deprivation, and interfere with metabolic signals, impairing the function of immune cells. It’s the process which promotes tumor immune escape. Gut microbiota metabolites are capable of participating in the cancer cells metabolic reprogramming and immune remodeling (Fig. 1 ). This section will focus on how the metabolic interaction network mediated by gut microbiota builds a communication bridge between tumor cells and immune cells. Fig. 1 Gut microbiota modulation in cancer metabolic reprogramming. A Glycometabolism. Lactic acid increases the expression of PD-L1 of neutrophils, suppressing T cell activities; Butyrate acts as HDACi, promoting apoptosis in tumor cells. Butyrate also facilitates the dephosphorylation and tetramerization of dimeric PKM2, a process that inhibits the Warburg metabolism of tumor cells. B Lipid metabolism. SCFAs increase IgA antibody in the intestinal mucosa and inhibit the PI3 K-Akt signaling pathway. They also bind to the FFAR2 receptor, increasing E-cadherin expressions. But the excessive accumulation of SCFAs promotes the transformation of immunosuppressive cells; DCA promotes the translocation of RelA (p65) to the nucleus,activating the NF-κB signaling pathway. UDCA restricts the activity of DCA, reducing the production of inflammatory factors. DCA also works with lipoteichoic acid, inhibiting COX-2 production. C Protein metabolism. Tumor cells and immune cells compete for amino acids.The expression of the glutamine receptor increases in cancer cells, helping them to absorb more amino acids. Gut microbiota produces hydrolase enzymes, which disrupts the epithelial barrier. D ROS production. ROS cause genetic mutations, DNA breaks, and chromosomal instability. MCT1, monocarboxylate transporter1; HDACi,histone deacetylase inhibitor; PKM2, pyruvate kinase isozyme type M2; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; FFAR2, free fatty acid receptor 2; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; DCA, deoxycholic acid; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid;COX-2, Cyclooxygenase-2; HSC, hepatic stellate cell; E. faecalis, Enterococcus faecalis; B. fragilis, Bacteroides fragilis ; GelE, gelatinase; BFT, fragilysin; ROS, reactive oxygen species

Fig. 1 Gut microbiota modulation in cancer metabolic reprogramming. A Glycometabolism. Lactic acid increases the expression of PD-L1 of neutrophils, suppressing T cell activities;…
Fig. 1 Gut microbiota modulation in cancer metabolic reprogramming. A Glycometabolism. Lactic acid increases the expression of PD-L1 of neutrophils, suppressing T cell activities; Butyrate acts as HDACi, promoting apoptosis in tumor cells. Butyrate also facilitates the dephosphorylation and tetramerization of dimeric PKM2, a process that inhibits the Warburg metabolism of tumor cells. B Lipid metabolism. SCFAs increase IgA antibody in the intestinal mucosa and inhibit the PI3 K-Akt signaling pathway. They also bind to the FFAR2 receptor, increasing E-cadherin expressions. But the excessive accumulation of SCFAs promotes the transformation of immunosuppressive cells; DCA promotes the translocation of RelA (p65) to the nucleus,activating the NF-κB signaling pathway. UDCA restricts the activity of DCA, reducing the production of inflammatory factors. DCA also works with lipoteichoic acid, inhibiting COX-2 production. C Protein metabolism. Tumor cells and immune cells compete for amino acids.The expression of the glutamine receptor increases in cancer cells, helping them to absorb more amino acids. Gut microbiota produces hydrolase enzymes, which disrupts the epithelial barrier. D ROS production. ROS cause genetic mutations, DNA breaks, and chromosomal instability. MCT1, monocarboxylate transporter1; HDACi,histone deacetylase inhibitor; PKM2, pyruvate kinase isozyme type M2; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; FFAR2, free fatty acid receptor 2; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; DCA, deoxycholic acid; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid;COX-2, Cyclooxygenase-2; HSC, hepatic stellate cell; E. faecalis, Enterococcus faecalis; B. fragilis, Bacteroides fragilis ; GelE, gelatinase; BFT, fragilysin; ROS, reactive oxygen species

Glycometabolism

Warburg metabolism represents a distinct mode of cancer energy metabolism. Its core characteristic lies in the fact that, even with sufficient oxygen, cancerous tissues are more likely to follow glycolysis pathway rather than OXPHOS pathway. This abnormal metabolic pattern is characterized by a significant production of lactate, a lower yield of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the shunting of glycolytic intermediates, and the remodeling of microenvironment [ 23 ]. Accumulation of lactate stimulates Propionibacterium freudenreichii to produce acetic acid which could further modulate the metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells [ 24 ]. Bacteria with the ldh, mgsA, and lldD genes have been correlated with the facilitation of lactate production[ 25 ]. In neutrophils, lactate activates the MCT1/NF-kB/COX-2 pathway, which raises programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. And T cell cytotoxicity is decreased because of the increased PD-L1 + neutrophils [ 26 ]. The acidic TME impairs immune cells, promotes tumor-associated angiogenesis and enhances cancer invasion and metastasis [ 27 ].

Butyrate is a kind of fermentation product of polysaccharides, mainly produced by the Firmicutes phylum , but also Actinobacteria , Bacteroidetes , Fusobacteria and others [ 28 ]. It is the preferred source of normal colon cells. When colonocytes become cancerous, the main energy source changes from butyrate to glucose [ 29 ]. As a result, the pathway to tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) of butyrate is blocked, resulting in its accumulation in the cancerous cells and nucleus. There, it acts as an histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), interfering with the cell cycle and promoting apoptosis of cancerous colonocytes [ 30 ].

Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), a key enzyme in the glycolytic pathway, is an important regulatory factor in Warburg metabolism. The dimeric PKM2 promotes the anabolic pathways that store phosphate metabolites as biosynthetic precursors for tumor progression [ 31 ]. Butyrate contributes to dephosphorylation and tetramerization of PKM2. The alteration suppresses the Warburg effect and redirects the anabolic metabolism towards energy metabolism, inhibiting tumorigenesis [ 32 ]. Dimer PKM2 is also capable of translocating to the nucleus, where it binds to hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (Hif-1α). This process regulates the expression of PD-L1 in immune and tumor cells, creating a immunosuppressive environment [ 33 ]. Additionally, nuclear PKM2 stimulates the phosphorylation of STAT3, enhancing the expression of IL-17 in CD4 + T cells [ 34 ].

Butyrate exerts its beneficial effects through many other mechanisms. When the internal environment is relatively balanced, it suppresses the pH of feces in the gut to inhibit DNA damage and the proliferation of pathogens as an acid [ 35 ]. While cancerous cells are detected, butyrate regulates certain signaling pathways to maintain intestinal homeostasis. For example, it weakens Wnt/βcatenin signaling to control cell proliferation and epithelial differentiation [ 36 ]. It also promotes toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) mediated NF-κB signaling which enhances innate immunity [ 37 ].

Lipid metabolism

SCFAs and bile acids are two primary categories of microbiota lipid metabolites. We will discuss the way they impact cancer progression, mainly focusing on how they influence the immune system and tumorigenesis pathways.

SCFAs

SCFAs are the anaerobic microbiota-derived metabolites. They have a dual influence on the occurrence and development of tumors. On the one hand, SCFAs have a reputation for maintaining immunity. They function as effective signaling molecules which stimulate the production of protective lgA in mucosal tissues and reinforce the integrity of the epithelial barrier [ 5 ]. SCFAs produced by the fermentation of starch by the fungus Schizosaccharomyces octosporus have even been shown to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs [ 38 ]. SCFAs also exert an inhibitory effect on the biological behavior of cancer cells. Taking colorectal cancer (CRC) for an example, SCFAs facilitate apoptosis by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Bad that activates caspase-3, thereby blocking the PI3 K-Akt signaling pathway [ 36 ]. In breast cancer cells, SCFAs also inhibit Hippo/YAP signaling pathway by binding to FFAR2, leading to an increase in E-cadherin expression, effectively preventing tumor invasion and metastasis [ 39 ].

On the other hand, with the advancing of research, SCFAs have been shown to exhibit negative effects in cancer prevention and treatment. Systemic SCFAs have been confirmed to diminish the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 therapy by reducing the expression of ICOS molecules on CD4⁺ T cells and the expression of CD80/CD86 molecules on DCs [ 40 ]. And the abnormal aggregation of lipid metabolites in tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells might induce the transformation of the immune cells into anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive phenotypes [ 4 ]. The contradictory effects of SCFAs highlights the importance of a more sophisticated interpretation of SCFAs’ role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression.

Bile Acids

Bile Acids are the endogenous chemicals produced from cholesterol in the liver. They are subsequently carried into the intestine and converted by gut bacteria into secondary bile acids. By attaching to nuclear receptors, bile acids could reprogram the transcriptional signaling of inflammation-related genes [ 41 ]. The secondary bile acid deoxycholic acid (DCA) induces the nuclear translocation of RelA (p65), which activates the NF-κB signaling pathway. The process potentially intensifies inflammatory reactions. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), on the other hand, has an anti-inflammatory impact by inhibiting the activity of DCA [ 36 ]. Furthermore, DCA promotes the conversation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) into senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which secretes a considerable number of inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic factors, increasing the risk of cancer [ 6 ]. When combined with DCA, lipoteichoic acid increases the expression of SASPs and COX2, resulting in an immunosuppressive microenvironment [ 42 ].

Protein metabolism

More and more research findings elucidate the influence of gut microbiota on immune remodeling and intestinal mucosal integrity via protein metabolism (Fig. 1 ). The multifaceted interaction between protein metabolism and oncogenesis will be reviewed here, with a specific emphasis on amino acid metabolism and enzyme production.

Amino acid metabolism

The homeostasis of amino acid metabolism in the circulatory system and the gastrointestinal tract is maintained largely by gut microbiota. Clostridium metabolizes branched-chain amino acids, arginine, and proline [ 43 ]. The Peptostreptococcus genus has been observed to metabolize glutamate and tryptophan [ 7 ]. Gut microbiota is also capable of synthesizing amino acids. At specific concentration, Streptococcus bovis has been identified to contribute to the de novo synthesis of amino acids [ 7 ].

Research shows that amino acid metabolism remodels tumor immunity. Malignant cells have enhanced amino acid absorption, which results in a depletion of amino acids in the TME [ 44 ]. T cell activation is inhibited by this decrease because it affects how well T cells use the amino acids [ 45 ]. Polyamines are a type of aliphatic amines synthesized from amino acid metabolism in both microbiota and host tissues. Zheng et al. clarified that polyamine metabolism is linked to the microbial communities that are abundant in the feces of patients who are responding to anti-PD-1 therapy [ 46 ]. However, it is still unknown how exactly gut microbiota affects immunotherapy through polyamine metabolism.

Amino acid metabolism is also closely linked to protecting the intestinal mucosal barrier. Lactobacillus , Anaerostipes and Bifidobacterium , along with others, catabolize tryptophan into indole derivatives. The bioactive compounds enhance the intestinal barrier function in germ-free mice by stimulating the Pregnane X Receptor [ 47 ]. A tryptophan-deficient diet administered to aged mice have been proved to result in an reduction in microbiota diversity and an increase in the levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines [ 48 ].

A correlation has been identified between amino acid metabolism and tumor physiology. There is an increased expression of the glutamine transporters in colorectal cancerous tissues [ 49 ]. Glutamine supplies α-ketoglutaric acid for TCA cycle and protects the integrity of the mitochondrial membrane, thereby inhibiting oxidative stress and fostering the growth of these malignant cells [ 50 ].

Enzyme production

Gut microbiota has the capacity to produce enzymes that damage the intestinal mucosa, trigger cancer-promoting signal cascades and impact gene stability. Enterococcus faecalis produces a metalloprotease known as GelE, which impairs the integrity of the epithelial barrier and causes chronic inflammation [ 51 ]. BFT is a zinc-dependent metalloprotease toxin produced by Bacteroides fragilis. It breaks down E-cadherin because of its proteolytic activity. The absence of E-cadherin not only enhances colon permeability but also triggers the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which in turn promotes the expression of the proto-oncogene MYC and colonic cell proliferation [ 52 ].

ROS production

Bacteria promote the accumulation of ROS either by directly producing ROS themself or by facilitating ROS production in host cells. It has been established that Lactococci , Enterococci and Helicobacter pylori , directly generate ROS in the form of superoxide [ 8 ]. While anaerobic bacteria bind to TLR2 or TLR4 on intestinal epithelial cells, enhancing ROS levels indirectly [ 35 ].

The impact of ROS on tumors can be either beneficial or detrimental, depending on the time and concentration of ROS involved. On the negative side, ROS cause DNA damage and genomic instability. E. faecalis are capable of producing hydroxyl radical, which causes genetic mutations, DNA breaks, and chromosomal instability, increasing the risk of CRC [ 35 ]. On the positive side, high ROS concentration kill tumor cells through ferroptosis, necroptosis, and apoptosis [ 53 ]. Tumors try to protect themselves from ROS damage by producing antioxidants. TIGAR levels were upregulated in precancerous lesions, where they reduce ROS levels by increasing NADPH and activating the pentose phosphate pathway [ 54 ]. In conclusion, the accumulation of ROS has a double-edged sword effect on tumors. In the field of cancer treatment, more targeted therapeutic approaches can be developed based on the relationships among ROS, microbiota, and oncology. At different stages of tumors, the development and occurrence of tumors can be prevented by dynamically intervening in the levels of ROS. In the pre-cancerous stage, the production of ROS can be inhibited. While in the advanced stage of tumorigenesis, the concentration of ROS can be increased to promote the death of tumor cells.

Other cancer-related metabolism

Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), the toxic gas produced by gut microbiota from sulfur-containing compounds, exhibits a dual role in the intestinal mucosa. Historically, it has been recognized that H 2 S disrupts the energy metabolism of colonic epithelial cells by inhibiting mitochondrial electron transport. However, recent studies have revealed that low concentration of H 2 S is actually helpful for mitochondrial function [ 55 ]. The double-sword characteristics of H 2 S emphasizes the necessity for a comprehensive approach to elucidate its function in carcinogenesis and progression.

Additional microbial metabolites like succinate and trimethylamine n-oxide (TMAO) affect glucose metabolism [ 56 , 57 ]. Once gut microbiota is in a condition of dysfunction and disturbance, the levels of these metabolites change, increasing the risk of carcinogenesis.

Gut microbiota and TME remodeling

Gut microbiota dysbiosis induces TME formation, shaping an immunosuppressive microenvironment. In the TME, different types of cells engage in crosstalk through complex metabolic interference mechanisms. The crosstalk promotes the immune escape of tumor cells and drives the progression of tumor development. In this section, we will focus on exploring how gut microbiota influences the TME through aging-associated and metabolic-associated TME remodeling.

Aging-associated TME remodeling

Generally, most cancers are more likely to occur in older people [ 9 ]. Both cancer and aging involve the accumulation of cell damage and share features such as gut microbiota dysbiosis, epigenetic alterations, chronic inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. The diversity of bacterial communities in adults decreases with age [ 58 ], with shifts in bacterial composition. It also varies in tumors [ 59 ], suggesting its role in reshaping TME.

Epigenetic modifications are crucial in cancer development and aging. It is widely acknowledged that epigenetic abnormalities can lead to tumorigenesis. And gut microbiota and their metabolites have to been demonstrated to regulate histone modifications, DNA methylation, and non-coding RNA [ 60 ]. Gut microbiota dysbiosis with age, may induce epigenetic alterations that promote tumorigenesis. Chronic inflammation is a distinct characteristic of cellular aging. With age, cells change into SASPs [ 61 ]. These cells are capable of increasing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, enzymes, chemokines, and growth factors. Over time, age-related accumulation of SASP factors creates a chronic inflammatory microenvironment [ 62 ]. With age, the mutation rate of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) increases [ 63 ]. MtDNA mutations and copy numbers change dynamically, altering metabolic state of the cells in the TME. For example, reduction of mtDNA copy number in human mammary epithelial cells (hMECs) initiates EMT-like reprogramming, leading to a fibroblastic morphology and an invasive phenotype [ 64 ]. And it has been shown that chronic infections with H.pylori and E.faecalis can induce mtDNA mutations that impair cellular respiration [ 8 ].

Comprehensive studies of the relationship between cancer and aging have identified the regulatory role of gut microbiota in several similar pathophysiological processes. As individuals age, gut microbiota dysbiosis may lead to epigenetic changes, chronic inflammation and damage to mitochondrion. Immunosenescence is an age-related immune dysfunction [ 65 ]. It is accelerated by the four traits that the TME and the aging microenvironment have in common. Madison et al. have identified a correlation between lower gut microbial diversity and higher T cell senescence and DNA methylation [ 66 ]. Chronic stimulation by commensal bacteria induces senescence in lymphoid germinal center (GC) B cells, leading to a reduction in IgA and disruption of mucosal immunity. The composition of gut microbiota is further altered by a loss in IgA, establishing a vicious cycle that harms intestinal homeostasis [ 65 ]. To disrupt the pathogenic network, treatment targeting the four hallmarks should be considered. We could utilize microbiota-directed therapies to restore youthful microbial profiles, which may further exert a positive effect on modifying the epigenome, inhibiting chronic inflammation, and reshaping the stability of mitochondrial function. Furthermore, normalizing the epigenetic landscape can be achieved by the drugs that target epigenetic regulators such as SCFAs. By intervening in the shared nodes of the cancer-aging-microbiota axis, these interventions hold promise not only for cancer prevention but also for extending the health span in aging populations.

Metabolic-associated TME remodeling

The TME is a complex ecosystem comprising neoplastic cells, immune cells, endothelial cells, stromal cells, extracellular matrix, and a variety of signaling molecules [ 67 ]. The main ones are Firmicutes and Proteobacteria , and they have an impact on the TME [ 5 ]. For example, Fusobacterium. nucleatum binds to the immune checkpoint receptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (TIGIT) on cells, which limits the cytotoxic activity of natural killer (NK) cells [ 68 ]. Different cells within the TME engage in metabolic crosstalk. The tumor metabolic by-products may act as signaling molecules to interfere with the normal metabolic patterns of cells in the TME. The shift in the metabolic patterns of normal cells further creates a favorable environment for tumor metabolism, forming a vicious cycle. For instance, cancer cells release ROS that promotes the metabolic transition of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) to aerobic glycolysis. The process delivers the energy-rich substances for tumor growth [ 44 ]. It is worth noting that tumors display considerable metabolic heterogeneity. Tumor cells closer to blood vessels have better access to oxygen and nutrients. They obtain energy more through OXPHOS compared to tumor cells farther away from blood vessels [ 69 ]. When tumors metastasize, they may have new metabolic phenotype due to the different nutrient supply.

Strategies targeting the TME may represent novel approaches for cancer treatment. For instance, developing targeted drugs to specifically block the binding between F. nucleatum and TIGIT might be an effective means of regulating bacterial-immune interactions and activating the immune response. We can also block the metabolic support system in the TME, such as accelerating the clearance of tumor metabolic toxins and inhibiting the supply of tumor metabolic substrates. In the light of tumor metabolic heterogeneity, it is necessary to develop inhibitors targeting the OXPHOS or glycolysis pathways based on the distinct metabolic patterns of tumors. In conclusion, the TME provides a variety of potential targets for future cancer prevention and treatment.

Combination strategies of Gut microbiota in cancer therapy

Gut microbiota and clinical efficacy of anticancer combination therapy

Emerging evidence highlights the role of gut microbiota and their metabolites in driving TME remodeling. The regulatory effects on the metabolism of immune and tumor cells can not be underestimated. Elucidating how these microbiota-mediated mechanisms modulate therapeutic response to cancer therapies will provide crucial insights for optimizing combinatorial treatment strategies. In detail, gut microbiota impacts the efficacy of antitumor therapies by remodeling immune responses and drug metabolism. In the subsequent sections, we will explore in detail the roles of gut microbiota in various oncological treatment strategies.

Immunotherapy

Based on the microbiota-cancer metabolism-immune axis revealed by the above research, it has been clearly established that gut microbiota can activate the anti-tumor immune response by disturbing tumor metabolic reprogramming in the TME. It is of great scientific value to further analyze the mechanism of how the immune regulation mediated by gut microbiota influences the immunotherapy. Notably, it activates the immune system through stimulating immune cells, modulating cytokine secretion, regulating immune checkpoint expression, and increasing tumor cell immunogenicity, which significantly improves the efficacy of immunotherapies (Fig. 2 ). Fig. 2 An overview of mechanisms of how gut microbiota increases the efficiency of immunotherapies. A ICIs. LGG activates cGAS/STING pathway in DCs, promoting CD8 + T cell and NK cell activation; Inosine binds to A2 AR on T cells, promoting the activation of TH1 cells; C. cateniformis reduces the expression of PD-L2 in DCs; B. breve and E. hirae share antigenic similarities with tumors, enhancing the cross-reactive response of CD8 + T cells. B CAR-T therapy. SCFAs activate mTOR and inhibit the activity of deacetylases. C CpG-ODN immunotherapy: CpG-ODN activates the TLR9 receptor on myeloid cells, triggering a Th1-type immune response. Gut microbiota binds to the TLR4, increasing cytokine production and the efficacy of CpG-ODN immunotherapy. D OVs: OVs target tumor cells, promoting ICD. Bifidobacterium have similar antigen with tumor cells, triggering the cross-reactive effects. LGG, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; A2 AR, adenosine A 2 A receptor; C. cateniformis, Coprobacillus cateniformis; RGMb, repulsive guidance molecule b; B.breve, Bifidobacterium breve ; E. hirae, Enterococcus hirae ; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; TLR, toll-like receptor; OV,oncolytic virus; ICD, immunogenic cell death; TAAs, tumor-associated antigens; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs, damage-associated molecular patterns

Fig. 2 An overview of mechanisms of how gut microbiota increases the efficiency of immunotherapies. A ICIs. LGG activates cGAS/STING pathway in DCs, promoting CD8 + T cell and NK …
Fig. 2 An overview of mechanisms of how gut microbiota increases the efficiency of immunotherapies. A ICIs. LGG activates cGAS/STING pathway in DCs, promoting CD8 + T cell and NK cell activation; Inosine binds to A2 AR on T cells, promoting the activation of TH1 cells; C. cateniformis reduces the expression of PD-L2 in DCs; B. breve and E. hirae share antigenic similarities with tumors, enhancing the cross-reactive response of CD8 + T cells. B CAR-T therapy. SCFAs activate mTOR and inhibit the activity of deacetylases. C CpG-ODN immunotherapy: CpG-ODN activates the TLR9 receptor on myeloid cells, triggering a Th1-type immune response. Gut microbiota binds to the TLR4, increasing cytokine production and the efficacy of CpG-ODN immunotherapy. D OVs: OVs target tumor cells, promoting ICD. Bifidobacterium have similar antigen with tumor cells, triggering the cross-reactive effects. LGG, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; A2 AR, adenosine A 2 A receptor; C. cateniformis, Coprobacillus cateniformis; RGMb, repulsive guidance molecule b; B.breve, Bifidobacterium breve ; E. hirae, Enterococcus hirae ; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; TLR, toll-like receptor; OV,oncolytic virus; ICD, immunogenic cell death; TAAs, tumor-associated antigens; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs, damage-associated molecular patterns

ICIs

ICIs open a revolutionary new chapter in oncological treatment. Gut microbiota modulates the efficacy of ICIs by directly activating immune cells. In vitro and in vivo experiments have shown that the combination of anti-PD-1 with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) improved the efficacy of immunotherapy. LGG stimulates the cGAS/STING pathway in DCs, promotes type I Interferon (IFN I) production, and enhances CD8 + T cell and NK cell activity, exhibiting strong suppression against CD11c − MHCII + tumor cells [ 70 ]. Mager et al. found that the inosine from Bifidobacterium pseudolongum activates the adenosine A 2 A receptor specifically on T cells, promoting the activation of TH1 cells as well [ 71 ]. Furthermore, Coprobacillus cateniformis reduces PD-L2 expression in DCs and inhibits the PD-L2 receptor RGMb on T cells, which promotes the anti-tumor reaction. It has been identified as an effective way to overcome anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy resistance [ 72 ].

Gut microbiota enhances the immune response by increasing the immunogenicity of tumor cells. Certain commensal microbes share similar antigens with tumors. When T cells recognize microbial antigens, they cross-react with tumor-associated antigens. The cross-reactive T cells causes a stronger immune response. For instance, the SVYRYYGL (SVY) epitope of Bifidobacterium breve is similar to the tumor-expressed neoepitope antigen SIYRYYGL (SIY). SVY-specific T cells significantly inhibit the growth of B16-SIY tumors [ 73 ]. Vsamizizou et al. demonstrated that when specific T cells from the Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron or Bacteroides fragilis were introduced into a mouse model, the mice's unresponsiveness to CTLA-4 treatment was overcome [ 13 ]. Fluckiger’s team further validated the hypothesis that microbial-tumor cross-antigen reactions may enhance the efficacy of ICIs. They found that TMP of E. hirae was highly similar to the tumor PSMB4 antigen. Both antigens activate large numbers of CD8 + T cells, improving the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs [ 14 ].

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 primarily target secondary immune responses. CD47 is an innate immune checkpoint that is over-expressed on nearly all tumor cells [ 74 ]. It interacts with signal regulatory protein-alpha (SIRPα) on the surface of macrophages, preventing the phagocytosis of tumor cells [ 75 ]. Anti-CD47-SIRPα has emerged as a therapeutic strategy for the next generation of ICIs. Shi’s team has showed that Bifidobacterium colonized in the tumor and enhanced the efficacy of anti-CD47 immunotherapy by activating the STING signaling pathway in DC cells [ 76 ]. The research opens a new avenue for combination of microbiota and immunotherapy in cancer treatment.

CAR-T

CAR-T cell therapy has achieved unprecedented success in treating recurrent/refractory (R/R) hematological malignancies [ 77 ]. However, at the time of writing this article, research findings on how gut microbiota affects the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy are relatively limited. This review aims to explore the potential links between gut microbiota and CAR-T therapy and the mechanisms, which may provide a new perspective for the field.

In recent years, several clinical trials have revealed that specific gut microbial taxa, such as Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Bacteroides, Sutterella , and Akkermansia , predicts better outcomes for CAR-T cell therapy [ 78 – 80 ]. High-risk antibiotics with broad-spectrum and anti-pseudomonal capabilities before CAR-T cell infusion, has been associated with a decrease in efficacy [ 78 ]. The reduced efficacy of adoptive cell therapy (ACT), may be explained by the depletion of certain bacterial metabolic products in the host, such as short SCFAs, which is caused by these anaerobic bacteria targeting antibiotics. Luu et al. showed that SCFAs enhance the potency of CAR-T cells by inhibiting the function of HDAC and increasing mTOR activity [ 81 ]. However, in mice treated with CD19 CAR-T cell therapy and vancomycin, an antibiotic targeting gram-positive bacteria, systemic CD8α + DCs and IL-12 increase, leading to the improved therapeutic outcomes [ 82 ]. Therefore, the appropriate selection of antibiotics in combination with ACT immunotherapy may bring new treatment strategies and better clinical results for cancer treatment.

OVs

OVs exert their antitumor effects either directly by targeting and lysing tumor cells or indirectly by activating the immune system (Fig. 2 ) [ 83 ]. Human enteroviruses stand out as the most prevalent and effective reservoir among the several sources. Notably, some oncolytic enteroviruses have been shown to specifically target tumor cells, including Echovirus, Coxsackievirus B3 (CV-B3), and Coxsackievirus A21 (CV-A21) [ 84 ].

OVs turn “cold” tumors into “hot” tumors. They induce cell death by apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy, and others, when they infect malignant cells. This process is known as immunogenic cell death (ICD). It releases tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), activating both non-specific and specific immune responses [ 85 ]. Because of the mechanism, OVs can be used as effective primers for immunotherapies like ICIs and CAR-T. Kim et al. found that CF33 infection increases PD-L1 levels and TIL infiltration. When CF33 derivatives were combined with anti-PD-L1 therapy, tumor growth in CRC mouse model was controlled, and a better prognosis was achieved [ 86 ].

Gut microbiota contributes to the regulation of the antitumor effects of OVs through the activation of immune responses. For example, melanoma and Bifidobacterium -derived epitopes share cross-reactive antigens, which activates T cells and thereby enhances the efficacy of OVs [ 87 ]. Xia et al. found that probiotics or FMT reversed the low responsiveness of oncolytic virus vaccines to advanced CRC. This enhancement is potentially mediated by the activation of CD8 + T cells and a decrease in the percentage of Treg cells [ 88 ].

CpG-oligonucleotide immunotherapy

CpG-oligonucleotide (CpG-ODN) immunotherapy is another approach to treating cancer by activating the host immune system. CpG-ODN acts as an agonist for TLR9 on myeloid cells, which triggers a powerful Th1-type immune response [ 89 ]. Tumor-associated myeloid cells'reactivity to CpG-ODN can be improved when gut microbiota activates TLR4 on these cells. In germ-free or antibiotic-treated CRC or melanoma mouse models, there is a reduction in the production of IL-12 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) after the CpG-ODN immunotherapy, leading to the poor response to the treatment [ 90 ].

Overall, gut microbiota influences the responsiveness of various immunotherapies by activating the immune system and turning “cold” tumors into “hot” tumors. Precisely targeting gut microbiota may help to improve the efficacy of immunotherapies and provide more personalized treatment options for patients.

TCM

TCM has been utilized as a successful complementary treatment for cancer, particularly in China. Its specific anticancer mechanisms remain unclear. But it is very promising that TCM works with gut microbiota to directly modulate cell proliferation and immune responses, or indirectly affect the efficacy of other cancer therapies to enhance anti-tumor effects.

TCM is mainly administered orally. Its digestion and absorption in the gastrointestinal tract inevitably interact with gut microbiota. Through a sequence of biochemical events, gut microbiota alters the TCM components, which may have an impact on their therapeutic effectiveness. For instance, baicalin can be converted into baicalein. The former has limited anti-proliferative effects on cancer cells, whereas the latter arrests the cell cycle at the S-phase and has a strong pro-apoptotic effect [ 91 ]. Moreover, Ferulic acid can be transformed into 4-vinylguaiacol, which demonstrates inhibitory effects on the G1-phase of the cell cycle and induces apoptosis as well [ 17 ].

TCM also modulates the composition of gut microbiota. Certain TCM compound formulas or single herbes, including but not limited to Pien Tze Huang [ 92 ], Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg [ 93 ], and Sini Decoction [ 94 ], have strong anti-tumor effects by increasing the abundance of probiotics and reducing the pathogenic bacteria.

The synergistic effect of TCM and microbiota to regulate other cancer treatments cannot be overlooked. Poria cocos polysaccharides (PCPs) enhance the efficacy of 5-FU by reshaping gut microbiota, reducing the toxicity, regulating the production of inflammatory factors, and improving the intestinal barrier [ 95 ]. The process of TCM reshaping gut microbiota inevitably affects the production of metabolic products. When combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, Ginseng polysaccharides (GPs) reduce the ratio of Kyn/Trp and L-kynurenine and increases valeric acid production. This process inhibits Tregs and activates T cells and remarkably improves the sensitivity of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy [ 96 ]. Gegen Qinlian decoction enhances the efficacy of anti-PD-1 through its association with glycerophospholipid and sphingolipid metabolism of the microbiota [ 97 ].

Altogether, based on the connection between gut microbiota and TCM, we can develop specific TCM strategies to modulate the intestinal barrier and immunity, and explore the potential for combined treatment with TCM and other cancer therapies.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy

The efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is inextricably linked to gut microbiota. Colbert et al. has revealed a correlation between the abundance of gut microbial communities and the clinical outcomes of cisplatin and radiation therapy. Specific gut microbes have been shown to positively influence on the therapeutic effects of chemoradiotherapy [ 16 ].

The interaction among the host, microbiota, and chemotherapy is highly complex. In a vitro experiment, non-pathogenic E. coli or Listeria welshimeri were co-cultured with 30 chemotherapeutic drugs. The outcome revealed that the anti-cancer efficacy of 10 drugs was inhibited by one or both bacterial species, whereas the same bacteria could enhance the efficacy of the other six drugs [ 98 ]. Even different strains of one bacterial species have distinct impacts on cancer treatment. Enterotoxigenic B. fragilis promotes the development of CRC, while non-enterotoxigenic one enhances the efficacy of oxaliplatin [ 15 ]. The genes in E. coli that change the effectiveness of 5-FU have been found in recent Caenorhabditis elegans models. These genes are particularly linked to the metabolism of ribonucleotides and vitamins B6 and B9. When they are muted, the efficacy of 5-FU is consequently diminished [ 99 ]. Beyond influencing the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy, gut microbiota impacts therapeutic outcomes of chemotherapy through immune regulation. Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis enhance the sensitivity and responsiveness to the cyclophosphamide (CTX). E. hirae increases the CD8 + /Treg ratio in malignancies when it moves from the small intestine to lymphoid tissues. Meanwhile, B. intestinihominis facilitates the infiltration of IFN-γ-producing T cells into the TME [ 100 ].

Growing evidence suggests that gut microbiota also mediate the heterogeneity of tumor responses to radiotherapy through immune remodeling. Commensal gut microbiota in the mesenteric lymph nodes activates innate immune responses via LPS and enhances the toxicity of CD8 + T cells following total body irradiation (TBI) [ 101 ]. Antibiotic therapy or blocking LPS signaling reduces TBI's capacity to regress tumors [ 101 ]. The depletion of bacterial communities leads to a relative expansion of fungi, the Saccharomycetes expresses inhibitory signals to tumor immunity through the innate sensor Dectin-1, making radiotherapy less effective [ 102 ].

Polymorphic microbiome and tumor therapeutic resistance and toxicity

There is a connection between gut microbiota and the resistance and toxicity of cancer therapies. Polymorphic microbiome is a comprehensive analysis technology that integrates various analytical methods such as microbial metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, and metabonomics, and combines these technologies with clinical data [ 103 ]. With the advancement of polymorphic microbiome, we are now able to have a deeper exploration into the composition of microbial communities, transcriptional landscapes, protein expression levels, and metabolic differences in cancer. The following section presents a systematical review of the application of polymorphic microbiome in the study of anti-cancer medication resistance and toxicity.

Microbial metagenomics

Through the analysis of the abundance, diversity, and composition of microbiota at the genomic level, metagenomic sequencing technology offers a novel perspective about the structure of microbial communities. It provides platforms for high-throughput platforms for characterizing complex microbial communities and have been extensively applied in both clinical and preclinical researches.

Application of microbial metagenomics in immunotherapy

Only 20–40% of patients respond to ICIs even for the most sensitive tumors [ 104 ]. A multitude of studies have sequenced gut microbial genome of ICI patients. According to the analysis, the better outcomes of ICIs are associated with certain bacterial species, including Alistipes, Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Collinsella, Enterococcus, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Coprobacter, and Bacteroides [ 18 , 105 , 106 ]. Discrepancies in microbial compositions across studies are caused by differences in sample collection, sequencing, and statistical methods. Interestingly, these bacteria have been shown to participate in the immune remodeling of the TME [ 71 , 106 ]. Recently, FMT has emerged as a heated strategy to overcome resistance to ICIs, with clinical trials indicating its potential to reverse unresponsiveness [ 18 , 21 , 107 ].

A challenge of the broad application of ICIs is the potential risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Colitis is one of the adverse events induced by ICIs. Patients with ICI-induced colitis have been proved to occur characteristic alterations in gut microbiota [ 108 ]. In animal models, mice pre-treated with antibiotics developed nearly fatal colitis following anti-CTLA-4 treatment. However, the pathological response can be significantly reduced through the oral administration of the probiotic Bifidobacterium [ 109 ].

CAR-T, also subjects patients to a range of toxicities, including but not limited to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and fatal macrophage activation syndrome [ 110 ]. A study by Hu et al. found that multiple myeloma patients with severe CRS showed higher levels of Leuconostoc , Staphylococcus , Stenotrophomonas , and Bifidobacterium . However, an increased prevalence of Sutterella has been linked to longer survival and full remission [ 80 ]. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of gut microbiota is essential for optimizing CAR-T therapy outcomes.

Application of microbial metagenomics in chemotherapy and radiotherapy

Gut microbiota joins in the development of chemotherapy resistance through influencing drug metabolism. A clinical study revealed that bacterial DNA of class Gammaproteobacteria , especially from the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae families were detected in most PDAC samples. These bacteria express the enzyme cytidine deaminase (CDD L ). The process reduces the localized gemcitabine concentration and mediated the resistance [ 19 ]. Sitthirak et al. demonstrated that Gammaproteobacteria abundance was also dramatically increased in the cisplatin and gemcitabine-resistant groups [ 111 ].

Gut microbiota is an effective biomaker for chemotherapy toxicity. An increase in F. nucleatum and a decrease in Streptococcus and Prevotella have been associated with oral mucositis [ 112 ]. On one hand, the microbial communities directly affect chemotherapy toxicity by influencing drug metabolism. Irinotecan's active form, SN-38, is converted into non-toxic SN-38G in the liver. Bacterial β-glucuronidases in the intestine transforms SN-38G back into SN-38, causing intestinal toxicity [ 113 ]. On the other hand, microbiota indirectly affects toxicity through immunoe remodeling. Bifidobacterium infantis was able to alleviate the toxicity induced by 5-FU and oxaliplatin by enhancing the activity of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + T cells and inhibiting Th1 and Th17 cells [ 114 ]. All in all, selectively targeting gut microbiota holds promise for the future in decreasing the side effects of chemotherapy and improving the quality of life for patients.

Radiotherapy disrupts the mucosal barrier, leading to a shift in gut microbiota. This displacement of the microbial communities further trigger uncontrolled intestinal immune responses, ultimately resulting in the occurrence of radiation enteropathy [ 115 ]. Patients with radiation-induced complications exhibit a reduction in bacterial diversity and an enrichment of specific microbial groups. Ferreira et al. found a positive correlation between the abundance of Phascolarctobacterium , Roseburia , and Clostridium IV and the development of radiation enteropathy [ 20 ]. FMT alleviates gastrointestinal toxicity by increasing the thickness of the mucus layer and restoring the integrity of the intestinal epithelium [ 108 ]. The VSL#3 probiotic formulation, composed of Streptococcus , Lactobacillus , and Bifidobacterium , protects the intestinal mucosa from the adverse effects of radiotherapy [ 116 ]. Overall, metagenomic analysis can not only predict the risk of radiation enteritis but also provide individualized preventive treatment strategies for patients.

Microbial metatranscriptomics and microbial metaproteomics

Microbial metatranscriptomics is an approach that characterizes the diverse RNA populations of the individual bacteria or the microbiota. It serves as a bridge between metagenomics and metabolomics and proteomics [ 112 ]. By converting CRC cells from an apoptotic state to autophagy, F. nucleatum increases chemoresistance in these cells. When CRC cells were co-cultured with F. nucleatum , RNA-seq analysis showed that genes linked to autophagy pathways were more abundant. Subsequent western blot analysis confirmed that F. nucleatum increases the expression of autophagy-related proteins in cancerous colonocytes [ 117 ].

Microbial metaproteomics reflects the characteristics of numerous peptides and proteins, including expression levels, protein–protein interactions, and post-translational modifications [ 118 ]. However, microbial metaproteomics is currently seldom applied, and its potential in understanding the impact of microorganisms on cancer treatment remains to be further explored.

Microbial multi-omics

Microbial metabolomics, a method based on mass spectrometry technology, provides novel insights into how microorganisms influence cancer treatment by quantitatively analyzing the differences in microbial metabolic products. The intricate relationship between cancer drugs and bacteria cannot be fully understood though analyzing single microbial metabolomics. By combining various omics technologies, we can better identify the patterns of resistance and toxicity. In the gemcitabine group, Deinococcus , Pseudomonas , Streptococcus , and L-methionine were found to be negatively correlated. Low amounts of L-methionine may be resulted from Streptococcus transporting L-methionine into the cells via the ABC transporter [ 111 ] . Park's team conducted a multi-omics analysis combining transcriptomics, lipidomics, and serum metabolomics on CRC mice treated with B. bif _K57 and B. bif _K18 plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Integrating all these data, they concluded that certain species of Bifidobacterium may help overcome resistance in ICIs immunotherapy through promoting IFN-γ production on immune cells [ 119 ]. Omics technologies will be employed to integrate the identification of genes, transcripts, proteins and metabolic processes, thereby enhancing cancer treatment efficiency.

Microbiota-directed cancer therapy strategy

Therapies that direct microbiota represent a new area of oncology research. They have achieved remarkable and rapid progress over the past decade. The timeline of the history and evolution of microbiota-directed therapies is summarized in Fig. 3 and Tables 1 and 2 . All of these methods, whether they are untargeted ones enhance the overall composition of gut microbiota, or targeted ones modify the specific microorganism, are being actively and thoroughly investigated (Fig. 4 ). In this section, we will systematically review these strategies, discussing their advantages and limitations, and assessing their feasibility for clinical application. Fig. 3 The timeline of the history and evolution of the clinical translation of the microbiota-directed cancer therapy. A The cross-sectional timeline of microbiota-directed cancer therapy. Discovery: this stage began with accidental clinical observations. Scientists first noticed the associations between microbiota infections and tumor regression, and attempted to use them to regress tumors; Pre-Clinical Exploration: the focus was on basic research, revealing the connections between gut microbiota and immunity and gut homeostasis; Clinical Trials: based on previous research, clinical studies on microbiota-directed therapies (untargeted and targeted inventions) and combination therapies were carried out. However, there are problems of insufficient targeting and regulatory considerations in clinical applications; Precise and Individualized Treatment: the FDA approved the FMT products during this stage, marking the improvement of the regulatory system. As for the lack of targeting, it will be solved with the development of polymorphic microbiome, bioengineering, and targeted interventions. By analyzing the microbiome profiles of patients, and applying targeted interventions based on the analysis, precision medicine can be achieved in the future. B - G The longitudinal timeline of FMT, probiotics, dietary intervention, engineered microbes, phage therapy and nanomedicine-based drug delivery. CRC, colorectal cancer; TLR, toll-like receptor; Lm , Listeria monocytogenes ; UIRN, regorafenib-encapsulating nanoparticle; PNP, plant-derived nanoparticle; CTX, Cyclophosphamide; CpG-ODN, CpG oligonucleotide; M13@Ag, silver nanoparticles assembled on the surface of M13 phage

Fig. 3 The timeline of the history and evolution of the clinical translation of the microbiota-directed cancer therapy. A The cross-sectional timeline of microbiota-directed cance…
Fig. 3 The timeline of the history and evolution of the clinical translation of the microbiota-directed cancer therapy. A The cross-sectional timeline of microbiota-directed cancer therapy. Discovery: this stage began with accidental clinical observations. Scientists first noticed the associations between microbiota infections and tumor regression, and attempted to use them to regress tumors; Pre-Clinical Exploration: the focus was on basic research, revealing the connections between gut microbiota and immunity and gut homeostasis; Clinical Trials: based on previous research, clinical studies on microbiota-directed therapies (untargeted and targeted inventions) and combination therapies were carried out. However, there are problems of insufficient targeting and regulatory considerations in clinical applications; Precise and Individualized Treatment: the FDA approved the FMT products during this stage, marking the improvement of the regulatory system. As for the lack of targeting, it will be solved with the development of polymorphic microbiome, bioengineering, and targeted interventions. By analyzing the microbiome profiles of patients, and applying targeted interventions based on the analysis, precision medicine can be achieved in the future. B - G The longitudinal timeline of FMT, probiotics, dietary intervention, engineered microbes, phage therapy and nanomedicine-based drug delivery. CRC, colorectal cancer; TLR, toll-like receptor; Lm , Listeria monocytogenes ; UIRN, regorafenib-encapsulating nanoparticle; PNP, plant-derived nanoparticle; CTX, Cyclophosphamide; CpG-ODN, CpG oligonucleotide; M13@Ag, silver nanoparticles assembled on the surface of M13 phage

Table 1 Microbiota-directed clinical trials Year Intervention Purpose Cancer type Primary outcome measures Phase Status Clinical trial Role in translational medicine 2015–2018 Iron diet Evaluate the impact of iron diet on gut microbiota, inflammation, and CRC risk CRC Inflammatory indicators Not Applicable Completed NCT03548948 Early clinical trials using diet to fight cancer 2020–2026 High-fiber diet Investigate how dietary changes impact gut microbiota in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy Melanoma Change in gut microbiota II Active, not recruiting NCT04645680 Clinical application of combination therapy 2021–2023 Potato starch supplement Evaluate the safety and practicality of dietary supplement to patients treated with dual ICIs Solid cancer AEs I Completed NCT04552418 Exploration of new strategies for the combination treatment 1958 FMT First attempt to treat pseudomembranous enterocolitis with FMT Enterocolitis Cure rate — Completed [ 120 ] First clinical attempt of FMT 2017–2018 FMT Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of FMT in pouchitis patients Pouchitis AEs I, II Terminated NCT02782325 Attention to the safety of FMT 2018–2024 FMT Improve the efficiency of anti-PD-1 therapy Melanoma ORR II Completed NCT03341143 Beginning clinical trial of the combination treatment 2022–2034 FMT Assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of FMT to cancer patients who do not respond to ICI therapy Solid cancer AEs; ORR II Recruiting NCT05286294 Clinical focus on patients with immunotherapy resistance 2020–2028 FMT Evaluate the safety of FMT in combination with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapy RCC ORR I Active, not Recruiting NCT04163289 Exploration of new combination patterns 2023 Polymorphic microbiome Find the clinical relevance between microbiota profile and immune response of patients CRC Microbiota composition and metabolites — Completed [ 121 ] Promotion the application of personalized treatment 2016–2018 Probiotic formula capsule Improve the nutrition and health state of CRC patients CRC Inflammatory indicators Not Applicable Completed NCT03782428 Early clinical attempts 2019–2023 Probiotics: CBM 588 Enhance the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapy RCC Change in Bifidobacterium I Completed NCT03829111 The first few clinical trials of the combination therapy 2019–2023 Probiotics: Live Biotherapeutic Product MRx0518 Strengthen immune responses in anti-PD-1 therapy-resistant patients Solid tumors AEs; clinical benefit I, II Terminated NCT03637803 Focus on patients with ICIs resistance 2025–2026 Novel Probiotic Assess how probiotics influence the microbiota in breast tumors and gut Breast cancer Beta-D-Glucagon; metabolite levels Not Applicable Not yet recruiting NCT04362826 Inspiration for developing more precise probiotics 1890 s Bacteria mix vaccine Attempt to treat patients with inoperable sarcoma Sarcoma DFS; disease progression — Completed [ 122 ] First clinical attempt of bacteria vaccine 2014–2019 Vaccines: CRS-207 Evaluate the anti-tumor response combined with chemotherapy Pleural mesothelioma AEs; immune indicators I Completed NCT01675765 Early clinical applications of bacterial vaccines 2015–2018 Vaccines: JNJ-64041809 Assess the recommended dose of JNJ-64041809 mCRPC DLT; T-cell Response; AEs I Completed NCT02625857 Standards establishment for the clinical application 2017–2023 Engineered Listeria (CRS-207) Evaluate the safety and efficiency of CRS-207 in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab Pancreas cancer ORR II Completed NCT03190265 Early clinical trials of combination therapy 2019–2022 Engineered Listeria (ADXS-503) Assess the safety and tolerability of ADXS-503 in combination with Pembrolizumab NSCLC AEs; ORR I, II Completed NCT03847519 Exploration of application standards 2021–2024 Engineered Salmonella (TXSVN) Explore the maximum safe dose of TXSVN Multiple myeloma DLT I Completed NCT03762291 Application of precise clinical trials Abbreviations : RCC renal cell carcinoma, mCRPC metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, ORR objective response rate, AEs adverse events, DLT dose-limiting-toxicity, DFS disease-free survival, CRC colorectal cancer, NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer Data source: ClinicalTrials.gov

Table 1
Microbiota-directed clinical trials
Abbreviations : RCC renal cell carcinoma, mCRPC metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, ORR objective response rate, AEs adverse events, DLT dose-limiting-toxicity, DFS disease-free survival, CRC colorectal cancer, NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer Data source: ClinicalTrials.gov

YearInterventionPurposeCancer typePrimary outcome measuresPhaseStatusClinical trialRole in translational medicine
2015–2018Iron dietEvaluate the impact of iron diet on gut microbiota, inflammation, and CRC riskCRCInflammatory indicatorsNot ApplicableCompletedNCT03548948Early clinical trials using diet to fight cancer
2020–2026High-fiber dietInvestigate how dietary changes impact gut microbiota in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapyMelanomaChange in gut microbiotaIIActive, not recruitingNCT04645680Clinical application of combination therapy
2021–2023Potato starch supplementEvaluate the safety and practicality of dietary supplement to patients treated with dual ICIsSolid cancerAEsICompletedNCT04552418Exploration of new strategies for the combination treatment
1958FMTFirst attempt to treat pseudomembranous enterocolitis with FMTEnterocolitisCure rate—Completed[ 120 ]First clinical attempt of FMT
2017–2018FMTEvaluate the safety and effectiveness of FMT in pouchitis patientsPouchitisAEsI, IITerminatedNCT02782325Attention to the safety of FMT
2018–2024FMTImprove the efficiency of anti-PD-1 therapyMelanomaORRIICompletedNCT03341143Beginning clinical trial of the combination treatment
2022–2034FMTAssess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of FMT to cancer patients who do not respond to ICI therapySolid cancerAEs; ORRIIRecruitingNCT05286294Clinical focus on patients with immunotherapy resistance
2020–2028FMTEvaluate the safety of FMT in combination with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapyRCCORRIActive, not RecruitingNCT04163289Exploration of new combination patterns
2023Polymorphic microbiomeFind the clinical relevance between microbiota profile and immune response of patientsCRCMicrobiota composition and metabolites—Completed[ 121 ]Promotion the application of personalized treatment
2016–2018Probiotic formula capsuleImprove the nutrition and health state of CRC patientsCRCInflammatory indicatorsNot ApplicableCompletedNCT03782428Early clinical attempts
2019–2023Probiotics: CBM 588Enhance the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapyRCCChange in BifidobacteriumICompletedNCT03829111The first few clinical trials of the combination therapy
2019–2023Probiotics: Live Biotherapeutic Product MRx0518Strengthen immune responses in anti-PD-1 therapy-resistant patientsSolid tumorsAEs; clinical benefitI, IITerminatedNCT03637803Focus on patients with ICIs resistance
2025–2026Novel ProbioticAssess how probiotics influence the microbiota in breast tumors and gutBreast cancerBeta-D-Glucagon; metabolite levelsNot ApplicableNot yet recruitingNCT04362826Inspiration for developing more precise probiotics
1890 sBacteria mix vaccineAttempt to treat patients with inoperable sarcomaSarcomaDFS; disease progression—Completed[ 122 ]First clinical attempt of bacteria vaccine
2014–2019Vaccines: CRS-207Evaluate the anti-tumor response combined with chemotherapyPleural mesotheliomaAEs; immune indicatorsICompletedNCT01675765Early clinical applications of bacterial vaccines
2015–2018Vaccines: JNJ-64041809Assess the recommended dose of JNJ-64041809mCRPCDLT; T-cell Response; AEsICompletedNCT02625857Standards establishment for the clinical application
2017–2023Engineered Listeria (CRS-207)Evaluate the safety and efficiency of CRS-207 in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumabPancreas cancerORRIICompletedNCT03190265Early clinical trials of combination therapy
2019–2022Engineered Listeria (ADXS-503)Assess the safety and tolerability of ADXS-503 in combination with PembrolizumabNSCLCAEs; ORRI, IICompletedNCT03847519Exploration of application standards
2021–2024Engineered Salmonella (TXSVN)Explore the maximum safe dose of TXSVNMultiple myelomaDLTICompletedNCT03762291Application of precise clinical trials

Fig. 4 Strategies based on gut microbiota in cancer treatment. Techniques for manipulating the microbiome include untargeted interventions (dietary interventions, probiotics and prebiotics, and FMT) as well as targeted interventions (phage therapy, engineered microbes, nanomedicine-based drug delivery and OMVs)

Fig. 4 Strategies based on gut microbiota in cancer treatment. Techniques for manipulating the microbiome include untargeted interventions (dietary interventions, probiotics and p…
Fig. 4 Strategies based on gut microbiota in cancer treatment. Techniques for manipulating the microbiome include untargeted interventions (dietary interventions, probiotics and prebiotics, and FMT) as well as targeted interventions (phage therapy, engineered microbes, nanomedicine-based drug delivery and OMVs)

Table 2 Preclinical research of microbiota-directed therapy Year Microbiota-targeted interventions Outcome Level of evidence Role in clinical translation Limitations Dietary intervention 1975 High-fat diets [ 123 ] Promoted CRC by affecting metabolites of gut microbiota Mouse models Early evidence of the relationships between diet, microbiota, and cancer Large individual differences; limited patient compliance; difficulties to achieve a balanced intake of nutrients 2009 High-fiber diets [ 124 ] Induced SCFAs production and modulated the inflammatory response Mouse models Early evidence of the benefits of microbiota metabolites 2013 High-fat diets [ 6 ] Promoted the SASPs production and HCC progression Mouse models Connection between diets and inflammation 2021 High-salt diets [ 125 ] Increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium and induced a robust immune response Mouse models Connection between diets and anti-tumor immune 2024 High-fiber diets [ 126 ] Enhanced the efficacy of radiotherapy and alleviated the intestinal toxicity of radiotherapy Mouse models Transition from basic mechanisms to combination treatment Probiotics and prebiotics 1977 Glycopeptides from Lactobacillus [ 127 ] Promoted the necrosis of tumors Mouse models Early connection between specific bacteria and tumor cell death Poor activity and stability; the double-edged sword of activating the immune response; insufficient in deep research on the mechanism 1997 Bifidobacterium [ 128 ] Inhibited the growth of CRC Mouse models Early discovery of the inhibitory effect 2004 LTA and LPS supplement [ 129 ] Exerted a protective effect on intestinal epithelial injury Mouse models From discovery to in-depth mechanism 2005 Bacteroides fragilis colonization [ 130 ] Directed the maturation of immune cells by polysaccharide Mouse models Link between bacteria and immunity 2015 Bifidobacterium Bifidobacterium [ 12 ] Enhanced ICIs efficiency Mouse models Transition from basic mechanisms to combination therapy 2022 Programmable probiotics E. coli [ 131 ] Regulated gut microbiota and protected the intestinal epithelial barrier Mouse models Tansition of precision probiotic 2023 Probiotics E. coli [ 132 ] Transported the radionuclide to the targeted tumor Mouse models New approaches for targeting tumors FMT 1972 Microbiota cultured with the drug [ 133 ] The drugs degraded when they were co-cultured with the human gut microbiota or in conventional mice In vitro and in vivo Early discovery of the impact of the microbiota on drugs Unstable efficacy; donor screening; ethical and regulatory issues; pathogen transmissionLimitationsLimitations 2013 Microbiota depletion [ 134 ] Suppressed the immune system and weakened the response to chemotherapy Mouse models Breakthroughs in basic research 2015 FMT [ 13 ] Bacteroides species enhanced the ICIs efficiency Mouse models Transition to the combination therapy 2025 FMT [ 135 ] Increased tumor-specific immunity and enhanced the sensitivity to chemoimmunotherapy Mouse models Inspiration for precision medicine Phage therapy 1917 Cultured with Shiga bacilli [ 136 ] Lysed the Shiga bacilli In vitro Discovery of phages Drug resistance; immunogenicity; complexity of combination therapy 1958 Cultured with tumor cells [ 137 ] Phages accumulated in tumors and possessed anti-tumor capabilities Cell lines Connection between phages and tumor regression 2006 Cultured with phage-resistant bacteria [ 138 ] Identified the specific proteins involved in the phage-bacteria interactions In vitro Discovery of specificity structural proteins 2019 Phage therapy [ 139 ] Increased the chemotherapy efficiency Mouse models Transition to the combination therapy with phages 2020 Phage therapy: phage targeting F. nucleatum (M13@Ag) [ 140 ] Prolonged the survival of CRC mice in combination with immunotherapy or chemotherapy Mouse models Transition to the precise therapy 2024 Phage therapy: The combination of 4 phages (SNIPR001) [ 141 ] Selectively killed E. coli in the gut and reduced the occurrence of bacteremia Mouse models Promotion of the clinical development of SNIPR001 Engineered microbes 1973 Engineered E.coil [ 142 ] Constructed the first E. coli with a recombinant plasmid In vitro Beginning of genetic engineering technology Biosafety issues; immunogenicity; demand for sophisticated technical requirements 1995 Listeria expressing TAA [ 143 ] Mediated the anti-tumor specific immunity Mouse models Transition to immune activation research 2022 Engineered Lactococcus lactis FOLactis [ 144 ] Activated a powerful anti-tumor immunity Mouse models Breakthrough in multi-dimensional immune activation 2022 Genetically engineered E.coil [ 22 ] Activated the immune response and controlled tumor growth Mouse models Breakthrough of oral tumor vaccines 2025 Engineered bacteria induced by light [ 145 ] Enhanced the antitumor response in tumors with low-immunogenicity Mouse models Transition to the precise therapy Nanomedicine-based drug delivery 1986 Anticancer protein of a specific size [ 146 ] Proposed EPR for the first time Mouse models Discovery of the anti-tumor properties of nanomaterials Difficulties in controlling the release of nanomedicines; biocompatibility of carriers; high research and development costs; great challenges in multidisciplinary integration 2001 Chitosan nanoparticles [ 147 ] Enhanced the ability of Mycobacterium phlei DNA to inhibit cancer cells Cell lines Transition to research about delivery efficiency 2024 Inulin-Based nanoparticle (UIRN) [ 148 ] UIRN upregulated the abundance of probiotics and the level of SCFAs Mouse models Research transition focusing on targeting ability enhancement 2025 Plant-nanoparticles (PNP) [ 149 ] PNP increased the efficiency of anti-PD-L1 therapy by remodeling microbiota metabolites Mouse models Transition to green and economical nanoparticles

Table 2
Preclinical research of microbiota-directed therapy

YearMicrobiota-targeted interventionsOutcomeLevel of evidenceRole in clinical translationLimitations
Dietary intervention
1975High-fat diets [ 123 ]Promoted CRC by affecting metabolites of gut microbiotaMouse modelsEarly evidence of the relationships between diet, microbiota, and cancerLarge individual differences; limited patient compliance; difficulties to achieve a balanced intake of nutrients
2009High-fiber diets [ 124 ]Induced SCFAs production and modulated the inflammatory responseMouse modelsEarly evidence of the benefits of microbiota metabolites
2013High-fat diets [ 6 ]Promoted the SASPs production and HCC progressionMouse modelsConnection between diets and inflammation
2021High-salt diets [ 125 ]Increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium and induced a robust immune responseMouse modelsConnection between diets and anti-tumor immune
2024High-fiber diets [ 126 ]Enhanced the efficacy of radiotherapy and alleviated the intestinal toxicity of radiotherapyMouse modelsTransition from basic mechanisms to combination treatment
Probiotics and prebiotics
1977Glycopeptides from Lactobacillus [ 127 ]Promoted the necrosis of tumorsMouse modelsEarly connection between specific bacteria and tumor cell deathPoor activity and stability; the double-edged sword of activating the immune response; insufficient in deep research on the mechanism
1997Bifidobacterium [ 128 ]Inhibited the growth of CRCMouse modelsEarly discovery of the inhibitory effect
2004LTA and LPS supplement [ 129 ]Exerted a protective effect on intestinal epithelial injuryMouse modelsFrom discovery to in-depth mechanism
2005Bacteroides fragilis colonization [ 130 ]Directed the maturation of immune cells by polysaccharideMouse modelsLink between bacteria and immunity
2015Bifidobacterium Bifidobacterium [ 12 ]Enhanced ICIs efficiencyMouse modelsTransition from basic mechanisms to combination therapy
2022Programmable probiotics E. coli [ 131 ]Regulated gut microbiota and protected the intestinal epithelial barrierMouse modelsTansition of precision probiotic
2023Probiotics E. coli [ 132 ]Transported the radionuclide to the targeted tumorMouse modelsNew approaches for targeting tumors
FMT
1972Microbiota cultured with the drug [ 133 ]The drugs degraded when they were co-cultured with the human gut microbiota or in conventional miceIn vitro and in vivoEarly discovery of the impact of the microbiota on drugsUnstable efficacy; donor screening; ethical and regulatory issues; pathogen transmissionLimitationsLimitations
2013Microbiota depletion [ 134 ]Suppressed the immune system and weakened the response to chemotherapyMouse modelsBreakthroughs in basic research
2015FMT [ 13 ]Bacteroides species enhanced the ICIs efficiencyMouse modelsTransition to the combination therapy
2025FMT [ 135 ]Increased tumor-specific immunity and enhanced the sensitivity to chemoimmunotherapyMouse modelsInspiration for precision medicine
Phage therapy
1917Cultured with Shiga bacilli [ 136 ]Lysed the Shiga bacilliIn vitroDiscovery of phagesDrug resistance; immunogenicity; complexity of combination therapy
1958Cultured with tumor cells [ 137 ]Phages accumulated in tumors and possessed anti-tumor capabilitiesCell linesConnection between phages and tumor regression
2006Cultured with phage-resistant bacteria [ 138 ]Identified the specific proteins involved in the phage-bacteria interactionsIn vitroDiscovery of specificity structural proteins
2019Phage therapy [ 139 ]Increased the chemotherapy efficiencyMouse modelsTransition to the combination therapy with phages
2020Phage therapy: phage targeting F. nucleatum (M13@Ag) [ 140 ]Prolonged the survival of CRC mice in combination with immunotherapy or chemotherapyMouse modelsTransition to the precise therapy
2024Phage therapy: The combination of 4 phages (SNIPR001) [ 141 ]Selectively killed E. coli in the gut and reduced the occurrence of bacteremiaMouse modelsPromotion of the clinical development of SNIPR001
Engineered microbes
1973Engineered E.coil [ 142 ]Constructed the first E. coli with a recombinant plasmidIn vitroBeginning of genetic engineering technologyBiosafety issues; immunogenicity; demand for sophisticated technical requirements
1995Listeria expressing TAA [ 143 ]Mediated the anti-tumor specific immunityMouse modelsTransition to immune activation research
2022Engineered Lactococcus lactis FOLactis [ 144 ]Activated a powerful anti-tumor immunityMouse modelsBreakthrough in multi-dimensional immune activation
2022Genetically engineered E.coil [ 22 ]Activated the immune response and controlled tumor growthMouse modelsBreakthrough of oral tumor vaccines
2025Engineered bacteria induced by light [ 145 ]Enhanced the antitumor response in tumors with low-immunogenicityMouse modelsTransition to the precise therapy
Nanomedicine-based drug delivery
1986Anticancer protein of a specific size [ 146 ]Proposed EPR for the first timeMouse modelsDiscovery of the anti-tumor properties of nanomaterialsDifficulties in controlling the release of nanomedicines; biocompatibility of carriers; high research and development costs; great challenges in multidisciplinary integration
2001Chitosan nanoparticles [ 147 ]Enhanced the ability of Mycobacterium phlei DNA to inhibit cancer cellsCell linesTransition to research about delivery efficiency
2024Inulin-Based nanoparticle (UIRN) [ 148 ]UIRN upregulated the abundance of probiotics and the level of SCFAsMouse modelsResearch transition focusing on targeting ability enhancement
2025Plant-nanoparticles (PNP) [ 149 ]PNP increased the efficiency of anti-PD-L1 therapy by remodeling microbiota metabolitesMouse modelsTransition to green and economical nanoparticles

Untargeted interventions

Dietary intervention

Cancers are associated with diets. A range of dietary strategies, including high-fiber diets [ 150 ], ketogenic diets [ 151 ], high-salt diets [ 125 ], and high-fat diets [ 6 ], have been studied for their potential to modify gut microbiota composition and influence tumor progression. For instance, high-salt diets have been observed to increase the abundance of Bifidobacterium in the gut and promote its migration to tumor tissues where Bifidobacterium effectively activates natural NK cells and induces antitumor immunity [ 125 ]. In contrast, high-fat diets enhance the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma through the promotion of inflammatory cytokine production by HSCs [ 6 ]. Notably, the components of daily diets and the nutritional needs are complex [ 152 ], making it difficult to rely solely on dietary therapy for tumor prevention and treatment in practice. Reasonable dietary strategies must be cautiously formulated in consideration with actual clinical situations.

Probiotics and prebiotics

Probiotics are live microorganisms that have been proven to participate in cancer treatment by maintaining the gut barrier integrity and regulating the immune system. Lactobacillus and E.- coli protect gut epithelium by upregulating tight protein and mucin protein expression. Specific probiotics activate DCs and Tregs, inhibit the activity of Th17, and suppress the expression of inflammatory factors like IL-23 and IL-17 [ 153 ]. CC4, a mixture of four Clostridiales strains, even superior therapeutic effects to anti-PD-1 therapy in a CRC model [ 154 ]. Although probiotics have yielded promising results in animal experiments, this therapy still faces issues such as low gastrointestinal absorption rate and insufficient concentration at the lesion site. Programmed probiotics appear to be a promising avenue for solving these problems. Zhou et al. encapsulated E. coli with a biofilm composed of chitosan and sodium alginate. The shell endows the probiotics with higher bioavailability, biosafety, and absorption rate in vivo. In a mouse model, it demonstrated the ability to regulate gut microbiota and restore the integrity of the intestinal mucosa [ 131 ]. Nevertheless, several other studies have indicated that the application of probiotics not only fails to improve clinical outcomes but also reduces the efficacy of cancer treatments. For instance, orally gavaging B. longum or L GG have been found to impair the effectiveness of anti-PD-L1 [ 150 ]. Future research needs to investigate how to customize probiotic treatment plans according to the different conditions of the hosts.

Prebiotics are indigestible food substances that influence the composition of gut microbiota [ 155 ]. Inulin and pectin, which are naturally contained in many fruits and vegetables, increase the levels of SCFAs in the gut, thus enhancing the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy [ 156 , 157 ]. Synbiotics, a combination of probiotics and prebiotics, have shown more positive benefits. Motoori et al. discovered that synbiotics in combination with chemotherapy drugs largely reduced the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse reactions compared to the use of probiotics alone [ 158 ].

FMT

FMT refers to the process of transferring feces from a healthy donor to a recipient with microbiota dysbiosis [ 159 ]. As previously mentioned, FMT has the potential not only to enhance the efficacy of cancer treatments and overcome resistance but also to alleviate adverse reactions associated with therapy. The transplantation material of FMT is not a simple drug but highly individualized gut microbiotas. It makes FMT particularly challenging to regulate. The FDA has changed its stance on the regulatory issues of FMT many times [ 160 ]. Countries such as India and Finland have not even formulated regulatory procedures for FMT [ 161 ]. FMT is highly dynamic. The therapeutic effects of different clinicals trials are closely associated with donor and recipient selection, sample collection, and the route and frequency of administration. During the Second ROME Consensus Conference, global experts established a standardized pipeline for FMT, providing guidelines to ensure more stable therapeutic effects in its clinical applications. The conference reached consensus in many aspects. For instance, donors are required to receive investigations of their medical history, blood, and feces. And it is recommended to use frozen feces for transplantation procedures to maintain the activity and stability [ 162 ].

Targeted interventions

Phage therapy

Cancer patients often take antibiotics during treatment to prevent infections because of the impaired immune system. However, antibiotics lack specificity may cause more harm than good by reducing the diversity of gut microbiota. In contrast, phage therapy target specific harmful bacteria, minimizing the loss of beneficial commensal microbiota [ 163 ]. For instance, engineered phages targeting E. coli by CRISPR-Cas system effectively reduced the E. coli load in mouse models’ intestines, serving as a strategy to prevent bacterial translocation and bacteremia during cancer therapy [ 141 ]. Dong et al. designed the M13 phage coated with silver nanoparticles (M13@Ag), which targets F. nucleatum , the bacteria that increase myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) . It enhances the efficacy of immunotherapy and chemotherapy by reducing MDSCs production and immunogenically activating DCs and promoting the polarization towards the M1 phenotype [ 140 ]. Nevertheless, the practical application of phages faces numerous challenges, including phage resistance, potential immunogenicity, and the complexity of designing the delivery systems. Addressing these difficulties is a focal point for future research.

Engineered microbes

Bioengineering technology makes the possibility of engineering specific microorganisms to exert antitumor effects become a reality (Fig. 4 ). These bioengineered bacterial strains are designed to delivery drugs to specific cells. Guo et al. engineered a kind of Salmonella typhimurium that expresses a cytotoxic agent apoptin. The injection of this bioengineered bacterial inhibited tumor growth and extended the survival time in murine models [ 164 ]. More interestingly, bacteria can be programmed as"intratumoral bioreactors". Cis and trans-gene regulatory elements are assembled in a specific manner in the bacteria to form feedback loops. The modified bacteria do not lyse and release the anticancer medicines into the TME until the bacterial population reaches a specific density. The few surviving cells after lysis begin to proliferate again [ 165 ]. This coordinated cycle, which expands and regresses according to bacterial density, optimizes the medicinal potential of genetically modified bacteria while averting harmful side effects.

Engineered bacteria can also express prodrug-converting enzymes, affecting the metabolism of tumor drugs. Salmonella expresses cytosine deaminase which turns the prodrug 5-fluorocytosine into the toxic form 5-fluorouracil [ 166 ], resulting in tumor regression. Additionally, engineered bacteria can be used to reshape the metabolic and immune microenvironment of tumors. Increased levels of L-arginine help enhance the antitumor capabilities of T cells [ 167 ]. Canale et al. synthesized an E. coli Nissle (EcN) 1917 that colonizes locally in tumors and converts tumor metabolic waste into L-arginine. The bioengineered bacteria synergized with ICIs and enhanced the antitumor response [ 168 ].

Employing engineered microbes as vaccines is an innovative application in oncology. Currently, Lactococcus [ 144 ], Mycobacterium (BCG) [ 169 ], and Escherichia [ 170 ] have been engineered as powerful vectors for anti-infective or anticancer vaccines. Recently, Redenti et al. designed EcN 1917 as a delivery platform for expressing tumor neoantigen peptides. Experimental results indicate that this EcN elicited a strong and long-lasting immune response, successfully inhibiting tumor growth and preventing tumor recurrence [ 170 ]. Most cancer vaccines are administered via subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, which only induces systematical humoral immunity against pathogens, with limited cellular immunity and weak mucosal antibodies [ 171 ]. Oral administration, on the other hand, is a safer alternative that elicits a stronger antitumor immune response. Yue's team designed an"artificial robot", which is basically a modified E. coli . This “artificial robot” releases OMVs loaded with tumor antigens into the intestine through oral administration, generating a specific immune response [ 22 ]. However, engineered microbes, as a type of exogenous antigen, may trigger abnormal immune responses. And the high requirements for biotechnology limit their widespread application.

Nanomedicine-based drug delivery

Compared with normal tissues, solid tumors possess abundant highly permeable neovessels and the imperfect lymphatic drainage system. This characteristic enables nanoparticles to more selectively accumulate in tumor tissues. It is called enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [ 172 ]. Mupirocin-derived nanoparticles have been proven to target the pro-carcinogenic F. nucleatum in tumor tissues without affecting the normal gut microbiota, which reduces the side effects of antibiotic mupirocin [ 173 ]. Song et al. incorporated the coding sequence targeting the LPS protein into the nanodelivery system. The specially designed nanoparticles can not only passively accumulate at tumor tissues by EPR effect, but also actively target these areas mediated by targeting protein. The increased capture of LPS reverses the tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment, improving the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 therapy [ 174 ]. Nanomaterials hold great potential in the medical field. Selecting appropriate nanomaterials to enhance their biocompatibility and adopting suitable methods to control drug release may accelerate the clinical translation process of nanomedicine-based drug delivery.

OMVs

OMVs are membrane sacs released during the growth of gram-negative bacteria [ 175 ]. These vesicles encapsulate a variety of bacterial components, including lipopolysaccharides, enzymes, DNA, RNA, and peptidoglycan [ 176 ]. OMVs are capable of reaching the site of tumors through the body’s fluid circulation, where they induce a robust immune response. Owing to the unique biological properties, OMVs have made remarkable progress in their application for vaccines, adjuvants, immunotherapies, drug delivery systems, and anti-bacterial agents [ 177 ]. Of note, the application of OMVs in tumor treatment is relatively under-developed, and more research is needed to explore their potential.

Challenges and perspective

In this review, we summarized the function of gut microbiota and its metabolites in controlling tumor metabolic reprogramming and reshaping the TME. By presenting findings from animal experiments and clinical trials, we emphasized that gut microbiota enhances the efficacy of current cancer treatment through immune remodeling and drug metabolism. Specific gut microbiota also predicts drug resistance and toxicity in cancer treatment, making them attractive biomarkers for cancer therapy.

However, whether there is merely a correlation or a definite relationship between gut microbiota and oncology remains a problem. Fortunately, increasing research findings have discovered the molecular mechanisms by which gut microbiota directly influences tumorigenesis. A recent study carried out by Chen et al. found that Lactobacillus plantarum MM89-derived γ-Linolenic acid mediates mitochondrial damage in CRC cells, which promotes ferroptosis of tumor cells [ 178 ]. At the genetic level, gut microbiota has been demonstrated to promote the expression of the tumor suppressor gene p53 by inhibiting lncRNA Snhg9. This protective effect reduces the risk of colorectal tumorigenesis under mild inflammatory condition [ 179 ]. In addition, from the perspective of evidence-based medicine, clinical studies have found that there are differences in gut microbiota between patients with different tumors and those in healthy individuals. The differences are observed in patients with tumors such as, but not limited to, CRC, lung cancer, and cervical cancers, etc. [ 180 ]. And studies have found that the composition of gut microbiota is also closely related to the prognosis of tumor treatment [ 181 ].

With the advent of in-depth investigations, microbiota-directed therapy has been shown to be a powerful anti-cancer strategy. It prevents and treats cancer by restoring intestinal homeostasis, strengthening the intestinal mucosal barrier, enhancing immunity, and promoting apoptosis of malignant cells. In recent years, there has been a growing number of clinical studies on FMT, dietary intervention, probiotic and engineered bacteria therapies (Table 1 ). Clinical research data indicate that when microbiota-directed therapy is used in combination with traditional cancer therapies, it significantly enhances the therapeutic effect, reduces the incidence of adverse events, thereby improving patient outcomes. FMT is one of the most mature clinical translations of microbiota-directed therapies. In 2022 and 2023, two FMT products, RBX2660 and SER-109, were approved by the FDA respectively [ 182 , 183 ], validating the clinical value of microbiota-based therapies. Regrettably, compared with untargeted interventions, clinical trials of targeted interventions are currently relatively scarce. Existing research mainly focuses on the biological modification of model strains (Table 1 ).

Microbiota-directed therapy still encounters many difficulties in clinical practice. How to precisely locate the therapeutic targets at the bacterial level stands out as a conspicuous problem. Because weak targeting may disrupt the homeostasis of the microbiota, leading to metabolic disorder and infection. The problems faced in clinical research can provide directions for preclinical research (Table 2 ). The application of bioengineering technologies has offered methods to improve the targeting and specificity of microbiota-directed therapy. Brödel et al. took use of a particle derived from phages to deliver a base editor in situ in gut microbiota. The particle precisely modified the genes in E.coli and achieved long-term stability in the mouse model [ 184 ]. Moreover, the nanomedicine-based drug delivery we mentioned above is a highly effective solution to address the insufficient targeting of microbiota-directed strategies. The latest research published in 2025 has further expanded the application of nanodelivery strategies in cancer treatment. Teng et al. extracted the exosome-like nanoparticles GELN from ginger. The miR159a-3p in GELN specifically targeted bacterial phospholipase C, resulting in the accumulation of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The increased DHA inhibited PD-L1 transcription in tumor cells and increased the efficacy of ICIs [ 149 ].

Microbiota-directed therapies also have some other common problems. For example, the sophisticated bioengineering technologies required for targeted interventions limit its clinical translation and large-scale production. We need to optimize the design of delivery carriers, explore simplified bioengineering technologies in microbiota editing, and invent modular engineered bacteria. Modular E. coli represents a highly mature technology. By integrating different functional modules, E. coli has been demonstrated to significantly improve the production efficiency of 5-hydroxytryptophan from the fermentation of glucose [ 185 ]. These efficient modular processes can be introduced into industrial production and be applied to reshape the amino acid energy metabolism in the TME. It may emerge as a potentially valuable and effective anti-cancer strategy in the future. Alternative technologies and low-cost materials should also be explored. Nanomaterials synthesized from natural resources or natural biomolecules are a relatively inexpensive production approach. Compared with some expensive metal nanomaterials, plant-derived nanomaterials are abundant in supply and low in cost. They have also shown their superior delivery properties and should be further explored [ 149 ]. There are more challenges. For example, the therapeutic effect of microbiota-directed therapy is severely affected by the differences in microbiotas among individuals. And the regulation and ethics of these biological products, as well as the effectiveness and safety of long-term application, have not been verified yet (Table 2 ). This reminds us that more research should be carried out to tackle these issues one by one.

Despite these drawbacks, they still exhibit great potential for anti-tumor effects. Microbiota-directed therapy integrating with microbiota profiling, represents a research trend in future precision medicine. Specifically, multi-omics techniques and host genome or epigenome can be employed to analyze the profiles of the microbiota as well as the host. Patient-specific microbiota and metabolites associated with cancer are identified. The composition of gut microbiota is an effective biomarker for treatment response, drug resistance, and prognosis in different tumor treatment. By integrating artificial intelligence and big-data analysis, we can predict the responsiveness and adverse effects of patients and tailor the most suitable strategy for them (Fig. 5 ). Fig. 5 Application of polymorphic microbiome in precision medicine. Fecal, blood, and tumor tissue samples are collected from patients for machine learning. We could combine the analysis of microbial multi-omics (metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, metabolomics), host genome and host epigenome. These evaluations are used to forecast prognoses and design the best possible treatment plans to improve therapeutic efficacy, overcome drug resistance, and reduce toxicity

Fig. 5 Application of polymorphic microbiome in precision medicine. Fecal, blood, and tumor tissue samples are collected from patients for machine learning. We could combine the a…
Fig. 5 Application of polymorphic microbiome in precision medicine. Fecal, blood, and tumor tissue samples are collected from patients for machine learning. We could combine the analysis of microbial multi-omics (metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, metabolomics), host genome and host epigenome. These evaluations are used to forecast prognoses and design the best possible treatment plans to improve therapeutic efficacy, overcome drug resistance, and reduce toxicity

In a word, the insufficient targeting and the instability of the therapeutic effect are the two main problems hindering the clinical application of microbiota-directed therapy. Future research should concentrate on developing convenient and low-cost polymorphic microbiome detection technologies, strengthening the collaboration between different disciplines to improve targeting ability and anti-tumor properties, and conducting large-scale clinical trials to further validate the efficiency and safety of the therapy. It will definitely promote the progress of the clinical translation of microbiota-directed therapy in the field of precision medicine.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Authors’ contributions

Mengying Cui conceptualized the review paper. Lixuan Wang structured the review. Weibo Jiang & Manshi Yang & Quezhu Danzeng designed the Figures. Lixuan Wang & Weibo Jiang & Quezhu Danzeng & Shiyu Liu contributed major amounts to manuscript writing and revising. Manshi Yang & Quezhu Danzeng & Shiyu Liu surveyed the literature. All authors were major contributors to revision, editing and proof-reading the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82303116), Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (YDZJ202301ZYTS047) and Health Science and Technology Capacity improvement Project of Jilin Province (2022 JC069).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

1. Vemuri R Shankar EM Chieppa M Eri R Kavanagh K Beyond Just Bacteria: Functional Biomes in the Gut Ecosystem Including Virome, Mycobiome Archaeome and Helminths Microorganisms 2020 8 483 10.3390/microorganisms8040483 32231141 PMC7232386 Vemuri R, Shankar EM, Chieppa M, Eri R, Kavanagh K. Beyond Just Bacteria: Functional Biomes in the Gut Ecosystem Including Virome, Mycobiome. Archaeome and Helminths Microorganisms. 2020;8:483. 32231141 10.3390/microorganisms8040483 PMC7232386

2. Zhu R, Lang T, Yan W, Zhu X, Huang X, Yin Q, Li Y. Gut Microbiota: Influence on Carcinogenesis and Modulation Strategies by Drug Delivery Systems to Improve Cancer Therapy. Advanced Science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). 2021;8:2003542. 10.1002/advs.202003542 PMC8132165 34026439

3. Ghesquière B Wong BW Kuchnio A Carmeliet P Metabolism of stromal and immune cells in health and disease Nature 2014 511 167 176 10.1038/nature13312 25008522 Ghesquière B, Wong BW, Kuchnio A, Carmeliet P. Metabolism of stromal and immune cells in health and disease. Nature. 2014;511:167–76. 25008522 10.1038/nature13312

4. Xia L Oyang L Lin J Tan S Han Y Wu N Yi P Tang L Pan Q Rao S The cancer metabolic reprogramming and immune response Mol Cancer 2021 20 1 21 10.1186/s12943-021-01316-8 33546704 PMC7863491 Xia L, Oyang L, Lin J, Tan S, Han Y, Wu N, Yi P, Tang L, Pan Q, Rao S, et al. The cancer metabolic reprogramming and immune response. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:1–21. 33546704 10.1186/s12943-021-01316-8 PMC7863491

5. Luu M Schütz B Lauth M Visekruna A The Impact of Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites on the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Cancers 2023 15 1588 10.3390/cancers15051588 36900377 PMC10001145 Luu M, Schütz B, Lauth M, Visekruna A. The Impact of Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites on the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Cancers. 2023;15:1588. 36900377 10.3390/cancers15051588 PMC10001145

6. Yoshimoto S Loo TM Atarashi K Kanda H Sato S Oyadomari S Iwakura Y Oshima K Morita H Hattori M Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome Nature 2013 499 97 101 10.1038/nature12347 23803760 Yoshimoto S, Loo TM, Atarashi K, Kanda H, Sato S, Oyadomari S, Iwakura Y, Oshima K, Morita H, Hattori M, et al. Obesity-induced gut microbial metabolite promotes liver cancer through senescence secretome. Nature. 2013;499:97–101. 23803760 10.1038/nature12347

7. Lin R Liu W Piao M Zhu H A review of the relationship between the gut microbiota and amino acid metabolism Amino Acids 2017 49 2083 2090 10.1007/s00726-017-2493-3 28932911 Lin R, Liu W, Piao M, Zhu H. A review of the relationship between the gut microbiota and amino acid metabolism. Amino Acids. 2017;49:2083–90. 28932911 10.1007/s00726-017-2493-3

8. Strickertsson JAB Desler C Rasmussen LJ Impact of bacterial infections on aging and cancer: impairment of DNA repair and mitochondrial function of host cells Exp Gerontol 2014 56 164 174 10.1016/j.exger.2014.03.024 24704713 Strickertsson JAB, Desler C, Rasmussen LJ. Impact of bacterial infections on aging and cancer: impairment of DNA repair and mitochondrial function of host cells. Exp Gerontol. 2014;56:164–74. 24704713 10.1016/j.exger.2014.03.024

9. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:12–49. 10.3322/caac.21820 38230766

10. Liu Z Liang Q Ren Y Guo C Ge X Wang L Cheng Q Luo P Zhang Y Han X Immunosenescence: molecular mechanisms and diseases Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023 8 200 10.1038/s41392-023-01451-2 37179335 PMC10182360 Liu Z, Liang Q, Ren Y, Guo C, Ge X, Wang L, Cheng Q, Luo P, Zhang Y, Han X. Immunosenescence: molecular mechanisms and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:200. 37179335 10.1038/s41392-023-01451-2 PMC10182360

11. Yousefzadeh MJ Flores RR Zhu Y Schmiechen ZC Brooks RW Trussoni CE Cui Y Angelini L Lee K-A McGowan SJ An aged immune system drives senescence and ageing of solid organs Nature 2021 594 100 105 10.1038/s41586-021-03547-7 33981041 PMC8684299 Yousefzadeh MJ, Flores RR, Zhu Y, Schmiechen ZC, Brooks RW, Trussoni CE, Cui Y, Angelini L, Lee K-A, McGowan SJ, et al. An aged immune system drives senescence and ageing of solid organs. Nature. 2021;594:100–5. 33981041 10.1038/s41586-021-03547-7 PMC8684299

12. Sivan A Corrales L Hubert N Williams JB Aquino-Michaels K Earley ZM Benyamin FW Lei YM Jabri B Alegre M-L Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy Science (New York, NY) 2015 350 1084 1089 10.1126/science.aac4255 PMC4873287 26541606 Sivan A, Corrales L, Hubert N, Williams JB, Aquino-Michaels K, Earley ZM, Benyamin FW, Lei YM, Jabri B, Alegre M-L, et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science (New York, NY). 2015;350:1084–9. 10.1126/science.aac4255 PMC4873287 26541606

13. Vétizou M Pitt JM Daillère R Lepage P Waldschmitt N Flament C Rusakiewicz S Routy B Roberti MP Duong CPM Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota Science (New York, NY) 2015 350 1079 1084 10.1126/science.aad1329 PMC4721659 26541610 Vétizou M, Pitt JM, Daillère R, Lepage P, Waldschmitt N, Flament C, Rusakiewicz S, Routy B, Roberti MP, Duong CPM, et al. Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science (New York, NY). 2015;350:1079–84. 10.1126/science.aad1329 PMC4721659 26541610

14. Fluckiger A Daillère R Sassi M Sixt BS Liu P Loos F Richard C Rabu C Alou MT Goubet A-G Cross-reactivity between tumor MHC class I-restricted antigens and an enterococcal bacteriophage Science (New York, NY) 2020 369 936 942 10.1126/science.aax0701 32820119 Fluckiger A, Daillère R, Sassi M, Sixt BS, Liu P, Loos F, Richard C, Rabu C, Alou MT, Goubet A-G, et al. Cross-reactivity between tumor MHC class I-restricted antigens and an enterococcal bacteriophage. Science (New York, NY). 2020;369:936–42. 10.1126/science.aax0701 32820119

15. Ting NL-N, Lau HC-H, Yu J. Cancer pharmacomicrobiomics: targeting microbiota to optimise cancer therapy outcomes. Gut. 2022;71:1412–1425. 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326264 PMC9185832 35277453

16. Colbert LE, Previs R, Medrano AYD, Eifel PJ, Jhingran A, Ramondetta L, Hahn SM, Jazaeri A, Frumovitz M, Schmeler K, et al. Rectal Microbiome Diversity Predicts Disease Response at Completion of Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix. Int J Radiation Oncolo*Biol*Physics. 2017;99:S51.

17. Luo Y Wang C-Z Sawadogo R Yuan J Zeng J Xu M Tan T Yuan C-S 4-Vinylguaiacol, an Active Metabolite of Ferulic Acid by Enteric Microbiota and Probiotics, Possesses Significant Activities against Drug-Resistant Human Colorectal Cancer Cells ACS Omega 2021 6 4551 4561 10.1021/acsomega.0c04394 33644563 PMC7905800 Luo Y, Wang C-Z, Sawadogo R, Yuan J, Zeng J, Xu M, Tan T, Yuan C-S. 4-Vinylguaiacol, an Active Metabolite of Ferulic Acid by Enteric Microbiota and Probiotics, Possesses Significant Activities against Drug-Resistant Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. ACS Omega. 2021;6:4551–61. 33644563 10.1021/acsomega.0c04394 PMC7905800

18. Gopalakrishnan V Spencer CN Nezi L Reuben A Andrews MC Karpinets TV Prieto PA Vicente D Hoffman K Wei SC Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients Science (New York, NY) 2018 359 97 103 10.1126/science.aan4236 PMC5827966 29097493 Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Karpinets TV, Prieto PA, Vicente D, Hoffman K, Wei SC, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science (New York, NY). 2018;359:97–103. 10.1126/science.aan4236 PMC5827966 29097493

19. Geller LT Barzily-Rokni M Danino T Jonas OH Shental N Nejman D Gavert N Zwang Y Cooper ZA Shee K Potential role of intratumor bacteria in mediating tumor resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine Science (New York, NY) 2017 357 1156 1160 10.1126/science.aah5043 PMC5727343 28912244 Geller LT, Barzily-Rokni M, Danino T, Jonas OH, Shental N, Nejman D, Gavert N, Zwang Y, Cooper ZA, Shee K, et al. Potential role of intratumor bacteria in mediating tumor resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine. Science (New York, NY). 2017;357:1156–60. 10.1126/science.aah5043 PMC5727343 28912244

20. Reis Ferreira M Andreyev HJN Mohammed K Truelove L Gowan SM Li J Gulliford SL Marchesi JR Dearnaley DP Microbiota- and Radiotherapy-Induced Gastrointestinal Side-Effects (MARS) Study: A Large Pilot Study of the Microbiome in Acute and Late-Radiation Enteropathy Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2019 25 6487 6500 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0960 31345839 Reis Ferreira M, Andreyev HJN, Mohammed K, Truelove L, Gowan SM, Li J, Gulliford SL, Marchesi JR, Dearnaley DP. Microbiota- and Radiotherapy-Induced Gastrointestinal Side-Effects (MARS) Study: A Large Pilot Study of the Microbiome in Acute and Late-Radiation Enteropathy. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2019;25:6487–500. 31345839 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0960

21. Davar D Dzutsev AK McCulloch JA Rodrigues RR Chauvin J-M Morrison RM Deblasio RN Menna C Ding Q Pagliano O Fecal microbiota transplant overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients Science (New York, NY) 2021 371 595 602 10.1126/science.abf3363 PMC8097968 33542131 Davar D, Dzutsev AK, McCulloch JA, Rodrigues RR, Chauvin J-M, Morrison RM, Deblasio RN, Menna C, Ding Q, Pagliano O, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients. Science (New York, NY). 2021;371:595–602. 10.1126/science.abf3363 PMC8097968 33542131

22. Yue Y Xu J Li Y Cheng K Feng Q Ma X Ma N Zhang T Wang X Zhao X Nie G Antigen-bearing outer membrane vesicles as tumour vaccines produced in situ by ingested genetically engineered bacteria Nature Biomedical Engineering 2022 6 898 909 10.1038/s41551-022-00886-2 35501399 Yue Y, Xu J, Li Y, Cheng K, Feng Q, Ma X, Ma N, Zhang T, Wang X, Zhao X, Nie G. Antigen-bearing outer membrane vesicles as tumour vaccines produced in situ by ingested genetically engineered bacteria. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2022;6:898–909. 35501399 10.1038/s41551-022-00886-2

23. Koppenol WH Bounds PL Dang CV Otto Warburg's contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism Nat Rev Cancer 2011 11 325 337 10.1038/nrc3038 21508971 Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:325–37. 21508971 10.1038/nrc3038

24. Casanova MR Azevedo-Silva J Rodrigues LR Preto A Colorectal Cancer Cells Increase the Production of Short Chain Fatty Acids by Propionibacterium freudenreichii Impacting on Cancer Cells Survival Front Nutr 2018 5 44 10.3389/fnut.2018.00044 29881727 PMC5976756 Casanova MR, Azevedo-Silva J, Rodrigues LR, Preto A. Colorectal Cancer Cells Increase the Production of Short Chain Fatty Acids by Propionibacterium freudenreichii Impacting on Cancer Cells Survival. Front Nutr. 2018;5:44. 29881727 10.3389/fnut.2018.00044 PMC5976756

25. Zhao C, Dong H, Zhang Y, Li Y. Discovery of potential genes contributing to the biosynthesis of short-chain fatty acids and lactate in gut microbiota from systematic investigation in E. coli. NPJ biofilms and microbiomes. 2019;5:19. 10.1038/s41522-019-0092-7 PMC6626047 31312512

26. Deng H Kan A Lyu N He M Huang X Qiao S Li S Lu W Xie Q Chen H Tumor-derived lactate inhibit the efficacy of lenvatinib through regulating PD-L1 expression on neutrophil in hepatocellular carcinoma J Immunother Cancer 2021 9 e002305 10.1136/jitc-2020-002305 34168004 PMC8231064 Deng H, Kan A, Lyu N, He M, Huang X, Qiao S, Li S, Lu W, Xie Q, Chen H, et al. Tumor-derived lactate inhibit the efficacy of lenvatinib through regulating PD-L1 expression on neutrophil in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e002305. 34168004 10.1136/jitc-2020-002305 PMC8231064

27. Certo M Tsai C-H Pucino V Ho P-C Mauro C Lactate modulation of immune responses in inflammatory versus tumour microenvironments Nat Rev Immunol 2021 21 151 161 10.1038/s41577-020-0406-2 32839570 Certo M, Tsai C-H, Pucino V, Ho P-C, Mauro C. Lactate modulation of immune responses in inflammatory versus tumour microenvironments. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21:151–61. 32839570 10.1038/s41577-020-0406-2

28. McNabney SM Henagan TM Short Chain Fatty Acids in the Colon and Peripheral Tissues: A Focus on Butyrate, Colon Cancer Obesity and Insulin Resistance Nutrients 2017 9 1348 29231905 10.3390/nu9121348 PMC5748798 McNabney SM, Henagan TM. Short Chain Fatty Acids in the Colon and Peripheral Tissues: A Focus on Butyrate, Colon Cancer. Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Nutrients. 2017;9:1348. 29231905 10.3390/nu9121348 PMC5748798

29. Eslami M Sadrifar S Karbalaei M Keikha M Kobyliak NM Yousefi B Importance of the Microbiota Inhibitory Mechanism on the Warburg Effect in Colorectal Cancer Cells J Gastrointest Cancer 2020 51 738 747 10.1007/s12029-019-00329-3 31735976 Eslami M, Sadrifar S, Karbalaei M, Keikha M, Kobyliak NM, Yousefi B. Importance of the Microbiota Inhibitory Mechanism on the Warburg Effect in Colorectal Cancer Cells. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2020;51:738–47. 31735976 10.1007/s12029-019-00329-3

30. Donohoe DR Collins LB Wali A Bigler R Sun W Bultman SJ The Warburg effect dictates the mechanism of butyrate-mediated histone acetylation and cell proliferation Mol Cell 2012 48 612 626 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.033 23063526 PMC3513569 Donohoe DR, Collins LB, Wali A, Bigler R, Sun W, Bultman SJ. The Warburg effect dictates the mechanism of butyrate-mediated histone acetylation and cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 2012;48:612–26. 23063526 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.033 PMC3513569

31. Anastasiou D Yu Y Israelsen WJ Jiang J-K Boxer MB Hong BS Tempel W Dimov S Shen M Jha A Pyruvate kinase M2 activators promote tetramer formation and suppress tumorigenesis Nat Chem Biol 2012 8 839 847 10.1038/nchembio.1060 22922757 PMC3711671 Anastasiou D, Yu Y, Israelsen WJ, Jiang J-K, Boxer MB, Hong BS, Tempel W, Dimov S, Shen M, Jha A, et al. Pyruvate kinase M2 activators promote tetramer formation and suppress tumorigenesis. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:839–47. 22922757 10.1038/nchembio.1060 PMC3711671

32. Li Q Cao L Tian Y Zhang P Ding C Lu W Jia C Shao C Liu W Wang D Butyrate Suppresses the Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells via Targeting Pyruvate Kinase M2 and Metabolic Reprogramming Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP 2018 17 1531 1545 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000752 29739823 PMC6072541 Li Q, Cao L, Tian Y, Zhang P, Ding C, Lu W, Jia C, Shao C, Liu W, Wang D, et al. Butyrate Suppresses the Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells via Targeting Pyruvate Kinase M2 and Metabolic Reprogramming. Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2018;17:1531–45. 29739823 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000752 PMC6072541

33. Pålsson-McDermott EM O'Neill LAJ Targeting immunometabolism as an anti-inflammatory strategy Cell Res 2020 30 300 314 10.1038/s41422-020-0291-z 32132672 PMC7118080 Pålsson-McDermott EM, O’Neill LAJ. Targeting immunometabolism as an anti-inflammatory strategy. Cell Res. 2020;30:300–14. 32132672 10.1038/s41422-020-0291-z PMC7118080

34. Weyand CM Zeisbrich M Goronzy JJ Metabolic signatures of T-cells and macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis Curr Opin Immunol 2017 46 112 120 10.1016/j.coi.2017.04.010 28538163 PMC5554742 Weyand CM, Zeisbrich M, Goronzy JJ. Metabolic signatures of T-cells and macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Immunol. 2017;46:112–20. 28538163 10.1016/j.coi.2017.04.010 PMC5554742

35. Yi J Lin P Li Q Zhang A Kong X A new strategy for treating colorectal cancer: Regulating the influence of intestinal flora and oncolytic virus on interferon Molecular Therapy Oncolytics 2023 30 254 274 10.1016/j.omto.2023.08.010 37701850 PMC10493895 Yi J, Lin P, Li Q, Zhang A, Kong X. A new strategy for treating colorectal cancer: Regulating the influence of intestinal flora and oncolytic virus on interferon. Molecular Therapy Oncolytics. 2023;30:254–74. 37701850 10.1016/j.omto.2023.08.010 PMC10493895

36. Yang Q Wang B Zheng Q Li H Meng X Zhou F Zhang L A Review of Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Tumor Progression and Cancer Therapy Advanced Science 2023 10 2207366 10.1002/advs.202207366 36951547 PMC10214247 Yang Q, Wang B, Zheng Q, Li H, Meng X, Zhou F, Zhang L. A Review of Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Tumor Progression and Cancer Therapy. Advanced Science. 2023;10:2207366. 36951547 10.1002/advs.202207366 PMC10214247

37. Xiao T Wu S Yan C Zhao C Jin H Yan N Xu J Wu Y Li C Shao Q Xia S Butyrate upregulates the TLR4 expression and the phosphorylation of MAPKs and NK-κB in colon cancer cell in vitro Oncol Lett 2018 16 4439 4447 30214578 10.3892/ol.2018.9201 PMC6126326 Xiao T, Wu S, Yan C, Zhao C, Jin H, Yan N, Xu J, Wu Y, Li C, Shao Q, Xia S. Butyrate upregulates the TLR4 expression and the phosphorylation of MAPKs and NK-κB in colon cancer cell in vitro. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:4439–47. 30214578 10.3892/ol.2018.9201 PMC6126326

38. Huang X Hu M Sun T Li J Zhou Y Yan Y Xuan B Wang J Xiong H Ji L Multi-kingdom gut microbiota analyses define bacterial-fungal interplay and microbial markers of pan-cancer immunotherapy across cohorts Cell Host Microbe 2023 31 1930 1943.e1934 10.1016/j.chom.2023.10.005 37944495 Huang X, Hu M, Sun T, Li J, Zhou Y, Yan Y, Xuan B, Wang J, Xiong H, Ji L, et al. Multi-kingdom gut microbiota analyses define bacterial-fungal interplay and microbial markers of pan-cancer immunotherapy across cohorts. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:1930-1943.e1934. 37944495 10.1016/j.chom.2023.10.005

39. Thirunavukkarasan M Wang C Rao A Hind T Teo YR Siddiquee AA-M, Goghari MAI, Kumar AP, Herr DR: Short-chain fatty acid receptors inhibit invasive phenotypes in breast cancer cells PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0186334 10.1371/journal.pone.0186334 29049318 PMC5648159 Thirunavukkarasan M, Wang C, Rao A, Hind T, Teo YR. Siddiquee AA-M, Goghari MAI, Kumar AP, Herr DR. Short-chain fatty acid receptors inhibit invasive phenotypes in breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0186334. 29049318 10.1371/journal.pone.0186334 PMC5648159

40. Coutzac C Jouniaux J-M Paci A Schmidt J Mallardo D Seck A Asvatourian V Cassard L Saulnier P Lacroix L Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer Nat Commun 2020 11 2168 10.1038/s41467-020-16079-x 32358520 PMC7195489 Coutzac C, Jouniaux J-M, Paci A, Schmidt J, Mallardo D, Seck A, Asvatourian V, Cassard L, Saulnier P, Lacroix L, et al. Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2168. 32358520 10.1038/s41467-020-16079-x PMC7195489

41. Chávez-Talavera O Tailleux A Lefebvre P Staels B Bile Acid Control of Metabolism and Inflammation in Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Gastroenterology 2017 152 1679 1694.e1673 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.055 28214524 Chávez-Talavera O, Tailleux A, Lefebvre P, Staels B. Bile Acid Control of Metabolism and Inflammation in Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1679-1694.e1673. 28214524 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.055

42. Loo TM Kamachi F Watanabe Y Yoshimoto S Kanda H Arai Y Nakajima-Takagi Y Iwama A Koga T Sugimoto Y Gut Microbiota Promotes Obesity-Associated Liver Cancer through PGE2-Mediated Suppression of Antitumor Immunity Cancer Discov 2017 7 522 538 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0932 28202625 Loo TM, Kamachi F, Watanabe Y, Yoshimoto S, Kanda H, Arai Y, Nakajima-Takagi Y, Iwama A, Koga T, Sugimoto Y, et al. Gut Microbiota Promotes Obesity-Associated Liver Cancer through PGE2-Mediated Suppression of Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:522–38. 28202625 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0932

43. Li T-T, Chen X, Huo D, Arifuzzaman M, Qiao S, Jin W-B, Shi H, Li XV, Consortium JLCB, Iliev ID, et al. Microbiota metabolism of intestinal amino acids impacts host nutrient homeostasis and physiology. Cell Host Microbe. 2024;32:661–675.e610. 10.1016/j.chom.2024.04.004 PMC11636940 38657606

44. Nenkov M Ma Y Gaßler N Chen Y Metabolic Reprogramming of Colorectal Cancer Cells and the Microenvironment: Implication for Therapy Int J Mol Sci 2021 22 6262 10.3390/ijms22126262 34200820 PMC8230539 Nenkov M, Ma Y, Gaßler N, Chen Y. Metabolic Reprogramming of Colorectal Cancer Cells and the Microenvironment: Implication for Therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:6262. 34200820 10.3390/ijms22126262 PMC8230539

45. Cronin SJF Seehus C Weidinger A Talbot S Reissig S Seifert M Pierson Y McNeill E Longhi MS Turnes BL The metabolite BH4 controls T cell proliferation in autoimmunity and cancer Nature 2018 563 564 568 10.1038/s41586-018-0701-2 30405245 PMC6438708 Cronin SJF, Seehus C, Weidinger A, Talbot S, Reissig S, Seifert M, Pierson Y, McNeill E, Longhi MS, Turnes BL, et al. The metabolite BH4 controls T cell proliferation in autoimmunity and cancer. Nature. 2018;563:564–8. 30405245 10.1038/s41586-018-0701-2 PMC6438708

46. Zheng Y Wang T Tu X Huang Y Zhang H Tan D Jiang W Cai S Zhao P Song R Gut microbiome affects the response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma J Immunother Cancer 2019 7 193 10.1186/s40425-019-0650-9 31337439 PMC6651993 Zheng Y, Wang T, Tu X, Huang Y, Zhang H, Tan D, Jiang W, Cai S, Zhao P, Song R, et al. Gut microbiome affects the response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:193. 31337439 10.1186/s40425-019-0650-9 PMC6651993

47. Venkatesh M Mukherjee S Wang H Li H Sun K Benechet AP Qiu Z Maher L Redinbo MR Phillips RS Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and Toll-like receptor 4 Immunity 2014 41 296 310 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.014 25065623 PMC4142105 Venkatesh M, Mukherjee S, Wang H, Li H, Sun K, Benechet AP, Qiu Z, Maher L, Redinbo MR, Phillips RS, et al. Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and Toll-like receptor 4. Immunity. 2014;41:296–310. 25065623 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.014 PMC4142105

48. Yusufu I Ding K Smith K Wankhade UD Sahay B Patterson GT Pacholczyk R Adusumilli S Hamrick MW Hill WD A Tryptophan-Deficient Diet Induces Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Increases Systemic Inflammation in Aged Mice Int J Mol Sci 2021 22 5005 10.3390/ijms22095005 34066870 PMC8125914 Yusufu I, Ding K, Smith K, Wankhade UD, Sahay B, Patterson GT, Pacholczyk R, Adusumilli S, Hamrick MW, Hill WD, et al. A Tryptophan-Deficient Diet Induces Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Increases Systemic Inflammation in Aged Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5005. 34066870 10.3390/ijms22095005 PMC8125914

49. Huang F Zhao Y Zhao J Wu S Jiang Y Ma H Zhang T Upregulated SLC1A5 promotes cell growth and survival in colorectal cancer Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014 7 6006 6014 25337245 PMC4203216 Huang F, Zhao Y, Zhao J, Wu S, Jiang Y, Ma H, Zhang T. Upregulated SLC1A5 promotes cell growth and survival in colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:6006–14. 25337245 PMC4203216

50. Ananieva E Targeting amino acid metabolism in cancer growth and anti-tumor immune response World J Biol Chem 2015 6 281 289 10.4331/wjbc.v6.i4.281 26629311 PMC4657121 Ananieva E. Targeting amino acid metabolism in cancer growth and anti-tumor immune response. World J Biol Chem. 2015;6:281–9. 26629311 10.4331/wjbc.v6.i4.281 PMC4657121

51. Steck N Hoffmann M Sava IG Kim SC Hahne H Tonkonogy SL Mair K Krueger D Pruteanu M Shanahan F Enterococcus faecalis metalloprotease compromises epithelial barrier and contributes to intestinal inflammation Gastroenterology 2011 141 959 971 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.05.035 21699778 Steck N, Hoffmann M, Sava IG, Kim SC, Hahne H, Tonkonogy SL, Mair K, Krueger D, Pruteanu M, Shanahan F, et al. Enterococcus faecalis metalloprotease compromises epithelial barrier and contributes to intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:959–71. 21699778 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.05.035

52. Sears CL Garrett WS Microbes, Microbiota, and Colon Cancer Cell Host Microbe 2014 15 317 328 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.007 24629338 PMC4003880 Sears CL, Garrett WS. Microbes, Microbiota, and Colon Cancer. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:317–28. 24629338 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.007 PMC4003880

53. Wang Y Qi H Liu Y Duan C Liu X Xia T Chen D Piao H-L Liu H-X The double-edged roles of ROS in cancer prevention and therapy Theranostics 2021 11 4839 4857 10.7150/thno.56747 33754031 PMC7978298 Wang Y, Qi H, Liu Y, Duan C, Liu X, Xia T, Chen D, Piao H-L, Liu H-X. The double-edged roles of ROS in cancer prevention and therapy. Theranostics. 2021;11:4839–57. 33754031 10.7150/thno.56747 PMC7978298

54. Cheung EC DeNicola GM Nixon C Blyth K Labuschagne CF Tuveson DA Vousden KH Dynamic ROS Control by TIGAR Regulates the Initiation and Progression of Pancreatic Cancer Cancer Cell 2020 37 168 182.e164 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.12.012 31983610 PMC7008247 Cheung EC, DeNicola GM, Nixon C, Blyth K, Labuschagne CF, Tuveson DA, Vousden KH. Dynamic ROS Control by TIGAR Regulates the Initiation and Progression of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:168-182.e164. 31983610 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.12.012 PMC7008247

55. Paul BD Snyder SH Kashfi K Effects of hydrogen sulfide on mitochondrial function and cellular bioenergetics Redox Biol 2021 38 101772 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101772 33137711 PMC7606857 Paul BD, Snyder SH, Kashfi K. Effects of hydrogen sulfide on mitochondrial function and cellular bioenergetics. Redox Biol. 2021;38:101772. 33137711 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101772 PMC7606857

56. De Vadder F Kovatcheva-Datchary P Zitoun C Duchampt A Bäckhed F Mithieux G Microbiota-Produced Succinate Improves Glucose Homeostasis via Intestinal Gluconeogenesis Cell Metab 2016 24 151 157 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.013 27411015 De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Zitoun C, Duchampt A, Bäckhed F, Mithieux G. Microbiota-Produced Succinate Improves Glucose Homeostasis via Intestinal Gluconeogenesis. Cell Metab. 2016;24:151–7. 27411015 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.013

57. Heianza Y Sun D Li X DiDonato JA Bray GA Sacks FM Qi L Gut microbiota metabolites, amino acid metabolites and improvements in insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism: the POUNDS Lost trial Gut 2019 68 263 270 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316155 29860242 PMC6275143 Heianza Y, Sun D, Li X, DiDonato JA, Bray GA, Sacks FM, Qi L. Gut microbiota metabolites, amino acid metabolites and improvements in insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism: the POUNDS Lost trial. Gut. 2019;68:263–70. 29860242 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316155 PMC6275143

58. López-Otín C Blasco MA Partridge L Serrano M Kroemer G Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe Cell 2023 186 243 278 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001 36599349 López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186:243–78. 36599349 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001

59. Dohlman AB Klug J Mesko M Gao IH Lipkin SM Shen X Iliev ID A pan-cancer mycobiome analysis reveals fungal involvement in gastrointestinal and lung tumors Cell 2022 185 3807 3822.e3812 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.015 36179671 PMC9564002 Dohlman AB, Klug J, Mesko M, Gao IH, Lipkin SM, Shen X, Iliev ID. A pan-cancer mycobiome analysis reveals fungal involvement in gastrointestinal and lung tumors. Cell. 2022;185:3807-3822.e3812. 36179671 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.015 PMC9564002

60. Liu T Du D Zhao R Xie Q Dong Z Gut microbes influence the development of central nervous system disorders through epigenetic inheritance Microbiol Res 2023 274 127440 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127440 37343494 Liu T, Du D, Zhao R, Xie Q, Dong Z. Gut microbes influence the development of central nervous system disorders through epigenetic inheritance. Microbiol Res. 2023;274: 127440. 37343494 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127440

61. Coppé J-P Desprez P-Y Krtolica A Campisi J The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression Annu Rev Pathol 2010 5 99 118 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144 20078217 PMC4166495 Coppé J-P, Desprez P-Y, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:99–118. 20078217 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144 PMC4166495

62. Fane M Weeraratna AT How the ageing microenvironment influences tumour progression Nat Rev Cancer 2020 20 89 106 10.1038/s41568-019-0222-9 31836838 PMC7377404 Fane M, Weeraratna AT. How the ageing microenvironment influences tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:89–106. 31836838 10.1038/s41568-019-0222-9 PMC7377404

63. Pinto M Moraes CT Mechanisms linking mtDNA damage and aging Free Radical Biol Med 2015 85 250 258 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.05.005 25979659 PMC4508218 Pinto M, Moraes CT. Mechanisms linking mtDNA damage and aging. Free Radical Biol Med. 2015;85:250–8. 25979659 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.05.005 PMC4508218

64. Guha M Srinivasan S Ruthel G Kashina AK Carstens RP Mendoza A Khanna C Van Winkle T Avadhani NG Mitochondrial retrograde signaling induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and generates breast cancer stem cells Oncogene 2014 33 5238 5250 10.1038/onc.2013.467 24186204 PMC4921233 Guha M, Srinivasan S, Ruthel G, Kashina AK, Carstens RP, Mendoza A, Khanna C, Van Winkle T, Avadhani NG. Mitochondrial retrograde signaling induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and generates breast cancer stem cells. Oncogene. 2014;33:5238–50. 24186204 10.1038/onc.2013.467 PMC4921233

65. Xu Y He C Xi Y Zhang Y Bai Y Gut microbiota and immunosenescence in cancer Semin Cancer Biol 2024 104–105 32 45 10.1016/j.semcancer.2024.07.004 39127266 Xu Y, He C, Xi Y, Zhang Y, Bai Y. Gut microbiota and immunosenescence in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2024;104–105:32–45. 39127266 10.1016/j.semcancer.2024.07.004

66. Madison AA, Burd CE, Andridge R, Wilson SJ, Bailey MT, Belury MA, Spakowicz DJ, Malarkey WB, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Gut Microbiota Richness and Diversity Track With T Cell Aging in Healthy Adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024;79:glad276. 10.1093/gerona/glad276 PMC10878250 38123141

67. Duan Q Zhang H Zheng J Zhang L Turning Cold into Hot: Firing up the Tumor Microenvironment Trends in Cancer 2020 6 605 618 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.02.022 32610070 Duan Q, Zhang H, Zheng J, Zhang L. Turning Cold into Hot: Firing up the Tumor Microenvironment. Trends in Cancer. 2020;6:605–18. 32610070 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.02.022

68. Gur C Ibrahim Y Isaacson B Yamin R Abed J Gamliel M Enk J Bar-On Y Stanietsky-Kaynan N Coppenhagen-Glazer S Binding of the Fap2 Protein of Fusobacterium nucleatum to Human Inhibitory Receptor TIGIT Protects Tumors from Immune Cell Attack Immunity 2015 42 344 355 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.01.010 25680274 PMC4361732 Gur C, Ibrahim Y, Isaacson B, Yamin R, Abed J, Gamliel M, Enk J, Bar-On Y, Stanietsky-Kaynan N, Coppenhagen-Glazer S, et al. Binding of the Fap2 Protein of Fusobacterium nucleatum to Human Inhibitory Receptor TIGIT Protects Tumors from Immune Cell Attack. Immunity. 2015;42:344–55. 25680274 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.01.010 PMC4361732

69. Li F Simon MC Cancer Cells Don't Live Alone: Metabolic Communication within Tumor Microenvironments Dev Cell 2020 54 183 195 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.018 32640203 PMC7375918 Li F, Simon MC. Cancer Cells Don’t Live Alone: Metabolic Communication within Tumor Microenvironments. Dev Cell. 2020;54:183–95. 32640203 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.018 PMC7375918

70. Si W Liang H Bugno J Xu Q Ding X Yang K Fu Y Weichselbaum RR Zhao X Wang L Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG induces cGAS/STING- dependent type I interferon and improves response to immune checkpoint blockade Gut 2022 71 521 533 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323426 33685966 PMC8710942 Si W, Liang H, Bugno J, Xu Q, Ding X, Yang K, Fu Y, Weichselbaum RR, Zhao X, Wang L. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG induces cGAS/STING- dependent type I interferon and improves response to immune checkpoint blockade. Gut. 2022;71:521–33. 33685966 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323426 PMC8710942

71. Mager LF Burkhard R Pett N Cooke NCA Brown K Ramay H Paik S Stagg J Groves RA Gallo M Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy Science 2020 369 1481 1489 10.1126/science.abc3421 32792462 Mager LF, Burkhard R, Pett N, Cooke NCA, Brown K, Ramay H, Paik S, Stagg J, Groves RA, Gallo M, et al. Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Science. 2020;369:1481–9. 32792462 10.1126/science.abc3421

72. Park JS Gazzaniga FS Wu M Luthens AK Gillis J Zheng W LaFleur MW Johnson SB Morad G Park EM Targeting PD-L2–RGMb overcomes microbiome-related immunotherapy resistance Nature 2023 617 377 385 10.1038/s41586-023-06026-3 37138075 PMC10219577 Park JS, Gazzaniga FS, Wu M, Luthens AK, Gillis J, Zheng W, LaFleur MW, Johnson SB, Morad G, Park EM, et al. Targeting PD-L2–RGMb overcomes microbiome-related immunotherapy resistance. Nature. 2023;617:377–85. 37138075 10.1038/s41586-023-06026-3 PMC10219577

73. Bessell CA Isser A Havel JJ Lee S Bell DR Hickey JW Chaisawangwong W Glick Bieler J Srivastava R Kuo F Commensal bacteria stimulate antitumor responses via T cell cross-reactivity JCI insight 2020 5 e135597 135597 10.1172/jci.insight.135597 32324171 PMC7205429 Bessell CA, Isser A, Havel JJ, Lee S, Bell DR, Hickey JW, Chaisawangwong W, Glick Bieler J, Srivastava R, Kuo F, et al. Commensal bacteria stimulate antitumor responses via T cell cross-reactivity. JCI insight. 2020;5(e135597):135597. 32324171 10.1172/jci.insight.135597 PMC7205429

74. Liu X Kwon H Li Z Fu Y-X Is CD47 an innate immune checkpoint for tumor evasion? J Hematol Oncol 2017 10 12 10.1186/s13045-016-0381-z 28077173 PMC5225552 Liu X, Kwon H, Li Z, Fu Y-X. Is CD47 an innate immune checkpoint for tumor evasion? J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:12. 28077173 10.1186/s13045-016-0381-z PMC5225552

75. Chao MP Majeti R Weissman IL Programmed cell removal: a new obstacle in the road to developing cancer Nat Rev Cancer 2011 12 58 67 10.1038/nrc3171 22158022 Chao MP, Majeti R, Weissman IL. Programmed cell removal: a new obstacle in the road to developing cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;12:58–67. 22158022 10.1038/nrc3171

76. Shi Y Zheng W Yang K Harris KG Ni K Xue L Lin W Chang EB Weichselbaum RR Fu Y-X Intratumoral accumulation of gut microbiota facilitates CD47-based immunotherapy via STING signaling J Exp Med 2020 217 e20192282 10.1084/jem.20192282 32142585 PMC7201921 Shi Y, Zheng W, Yang K, Harris KG, Ni K, Xue L, Lin W, Chang EB, Weichselbaum RR, Fu Y-X. Intratumoral accumulation of gut microbiota facilitates CD47-based immunotherapy via STING signaling. J Exp Med. 2020;217:e20192282. 32142585 10.1084/jem.20192282 PMC7201921

77. Zhang P-F Xie D Targeting the gut microbiota to enhance the antitumor efficacy and attenuate the toxicity of CAR-T cell therapy: a new hope? Front Immunol 2024 15 1362133 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1362133 38558812 PMC10978602 Zhang P-F, Xie D. Targeting the gut microbiota to enhance the antitumor efficacy and attenuate the toxicity of CAR-T cell therapy: a new hope? Front Immunol. 2024;15:1362133. 38558812 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1362133 PMC10978602

78. Stein-Thoeringer CK Saini NY Zamir E Blumenberg V Schubert M-L Mor U Fante MA Schmidt S Hayase E Hayase T A non-antibiotic-disrupted gut microbiome is associated with clinical responses to CD19-CAR-T cell cancer immunotherapy Nat Med 2023 29 906 916 10.1038/s41591-023-02234-6 36914893 PMC10121864 Stein-Thoeringer CK, Saini NY, Zamir E, Blumenberg V, Schubert M-L, Mor U, Fante MA, Schmidt S, Hayase E, Hayase T, et al. A non-antibiotic-disrupted gut microbiome is associated with clinical responses to CD19-CAR-T cell cancer immunotherapy. Nat Med. 2023;29:906–16. 36914893 10.1038/s41591-023-02234-6 PMC10121864

79. Smith M Dai A Ghilardi G Amelsberg KV Devlin SM Pajarillo R Slingerland JB Beghi S Herrera PS Giardina P Gut microbiome correlates of response and toxicity following anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy Nat Med 2022 28 713 723 10.1038/s41591-022-01702-9 35288695 PMC9434490 Smith M, Dai A, Ghilardi G, Amelsberg KV, Devlin SM, Pajarillo R, Slingerland JB, Beghi S, Herrera PS, Giardina P, et al. Gut microbiome correlates of response and toxicity following anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy. Nat Med. 2022;28:713–23. 35288695 10.1038/s41591-022-01702-9 PMC9434490

80. Hu Y Li J Ni F Yang Z Gui X Bao Z Zhao H Wei G Wang Y Zhang M CAR-T cell therapy-related cytokine release syndrome and therapeutic response is modulated by the gut microbiome in hematologic malignancies Nat Commun 2022 13 5313 10.1038/s41467-022-32960-3 36085303 PMC9461447 Hu Y, Li J, Ni F, Yang Z, Gui X, Bao Z, Zhao H, Wei G, Wang Y, Zhang M, et al. CAR-T cell therapy-related cytokine release syndrome and therapeutic response is modulated by the gut microbiome in hematologic malignancies. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5313. 36085303 10.1038/s41467-022-32960-3 PMC9461447

81. Luu M Riester Z Baldrich A Reichardt N Yuille S Busetti A Klein M Wempe A Leister H Raifer H Microbial short-chain fatty acids modulate CD8+ T cell responses and improve adoptive immunotherapy for cancer Nat Commun 2021 12 4077 10.1038/s41467-021-24331-1 34210970 PMC8249424 Luu M, Riester Z, Baldrich A, Reichardt N, Yuille S, Busetti A, Klein M, Wempe A, Leister H, Raifer H, et al. Microbial short-chain fatty acids modulate CD8+ T cell responses and improve adoptive immunotherapy for cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4077. 34210970 10.1038/s41467-021-24331-1 PMC8249424

82. Uribe-Herranz M Bittinger K Rafail S Guedan S Pierini S Tanes C Ganetsky A Morgan MA Gill S Tanyi JL Gut microbiota modulates adoptive cell therapy via CD8α dendritic cells and IL-12 JCI insight 2018 3 e94952 94952 10.1172/jci.insight.94952 29467322 PMC5916241 Uribe-Herranz M, Bittinger K, Rafail S, Guedan S, Pierini S, Tanes C, Ganetsky A, Morgan MA, Gill S, Tanyi JL, et al. Gut microbiota modulates adoptive cell therapy via CD8α dendritic cells and IL-12. JCI insight. 2018;3(e94952):94952. 29467322 10.1172/jci.insight.94952 PMC5916241

83. Feola S Russo S Ylösmäki E Cerullo V Oncolytic ImmunoViroTherapy: A long history of crosstalk between viruses and immune system for cancer treatment Pharmacol Ther 2022 236 108103 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.108103 34954301 Feola S, Russo S, Ylösmäki E, Cerullo V. Oncolytic ImmunoViroTherapy: A long history of crosstalk between viruses and immune system for cancer treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;236:108103. 34954301 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.108103

84. Cui B Song L Wang Q Li K He Q Wu X Gao F Liu M An C Gao Q Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) oncolysis using coxsackievirus B5 and synergistic DNA-damage response inhibitors Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023 8 366 10.1038/s41392-023-01603-4 37743418 PMC10518312 Cui B, Song L, Wang Q, Li K, He Q, Wu X, Gao F, Liu M, An C, Gao Q, et al. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) oncolysis using coxsackievirus B5 and synergistic DNA-damage response inhibitors. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:366. 37743418 10.1038/s41392-023-01603-4 PMC10518312

85. Muthukutty P Yoo SY Oncolytic Virus Engineering and Utilizations: Cancer Immunotherapy Perspective Viruses 2023 15 1645 10.3390/v15081645 37631987 PMC10459766 Muthukutty P, Yoo SY. Oncolytic Virus Engineering and Utilizations: Cancer Immunotherapy Perspective. Viruses. 2023;15:1645. 37631987 10.3390/v15081645 PMC10459766

86. Kim S-I Park AK Chaurasiya S Kang S Lu J Yang A Sivanandam V Zhang Z Woo Y Priceman SJ Recombinant Orthopoxvirus Primes Colon Cancer for Checkpoint Inhibitor and Cross-Primes T Cells for Antitumor and Antiviral Immunity Mol Cancer Ther 2021 20 173 182 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0405 33262221 PMC7790874 Kim S-I, Park AK, Chaurasiya S, Kang S, Lu J, Yang A, Sivanandam V, Zhang Z, Woo Y, Priceman SJ, et al. Recombinant Orthopoxvirus Primes Colon Cancer for Checkpoint Inhibitor and Cross-Primes T Cells for Antitumor and Antiviral Immunity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20:173–82. 33262221 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0405 PMC7790874

87. Tripodi L, Feola S, Granata I, Whalley T, Passariello M, Capasso C, Coluccino L, Vitale M, Scalia G, Gentile L, et al. Bifidobacterium affects antitumor efficacy of oncolytic adenovirus in a mouse model of melanoma. iScience. 2023;26:107668. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107668 PMC10502363 37720092

88. Chen X Wang G Qin L Hu B Li J Intestinal Microbiota Modulates the Antitumor Effect of Oncolytic Virus Vaccines in Colorectal Cancer Dig Dis Sci 2024 69 1228 1241 10.1007/s10620-024-08346-4 38400885 Chen X, Wang G, Qin L, Hu B, Li J. Intestinal Microbiota Modulates the Antitumor Effect of Oncolytic Virus Vaccines in Colorectal Cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2024;69:1228–41. 38400885 10.1007/s10620-024-08346-4

89. Bode C Zhao G Steinhagen F Kinjo T Klinman DM CpG DNA as a vaccine adjuvant Expert Rev Vaccines 2011 10 499 511 10.1586/erv.10.174 21506647 PMC3108434 Bode C, Zhao G, Steinhagen F, Kinjo T, Klinman DM. CpG DNA as a vaccine adjuvant. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011;10:499–511. 21506647 10.1586/erv.10.174 PMC3108434

90. Iida N Dzutsev A Stewart CA Smith L Bouladoux N Weingarten RA Molina DA Salcedo R Back T Cramer S Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment Science (New York, NY) 2013 342 967 970 10.1126/science.1240527 PMC6709532 24264989 Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA, Smith L, Bouladoux N, Weingarten RA, Molina DA, Salcedo R, Back T, Cramer S, et al. Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Science (New York, NY). 2013;342:967–70. 10.1126/science.1240527 PMC6709532 24264989

91. Wang C-Z Zhang C-F Chen L Anderson S Lu F Yuan C-S Colon cancer chemopreventive effects of baicalein, an active enteric microbiome metabolite from baicalin Int J Oncol 2015 47 1749 1758 10.3892/ijo.2015.3173 26398706 PMC4599184 Wang C-Z, Zhang C-F, Chen L, Anderson S, Lu F, Yuan C-S. Colon cancer chemopreventive effects of baicalein, an active enteric microbiome metabolite from baicalin. Int J Oncol. 2015;47:1749–58. 26398706 10.3892/ijo.2015.3173 PMC4599184

92. Gou H Su H Liu D Wong CC Shang H Fang Y Zeng X Chen H Li Y Huang Z Traditional Medicine Pien Tze Huang Suppresses Colorectal Tumorigenesis Through Restoring Gut Microbiota and Metabolites Gastroenterology 2023 165 1404 1419 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.052 37704113 Gou H, Su H, Liu D, Wong CC, Shang H, Fang Y, Zeng X, Chen H, Li Y, Huang Z, et al. Traditional Medicine Pien Tze Huang Suppresses Colorectal Tumorigenesis Through Restoring Gut Microbiota and Metabolites. Gastroenterology. 2023;165:1404–19. 37704113 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.052

93. Han B Zhai Y Li X Zhao H Sun C Zeng Y Zhang W Lu J Kai G Total flavonoids of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg inhibits colorectal tumor growth by modulating gut microbiota and metabolites Food Chem 2023 410 135361 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135361 36610085 Han B, Zhai Y, Li X, Zhao H, Sun C, Zeng Y, Zhang W, Lu J, Kai G. Total flavonoids of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg inhibits colorectal tumor growth by modulating gut microbiota and metabolites. Food Chem. 2023;410:135361. 36610085 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135361

94. Wang Y Zhang X Li J Zhang Y Guo Y Chang Q Chen L Wang Y Wang S Song Y Sini Decoction Ameliorates Colorectal Cancer and Modulates the Composition of Gut Microbiota in Mice Front Pharmacol 2021 12 609992 10.3389/fphar.2021.609992 33776762 PMC7991589 Wang Y, Zhang X, Li J, Zhang Y, Guo Y, Chang Q, Chen L, Wang Y, Wang S, Song Y, et al. Sini Decoction Ameliorates Colorectal Cancer and Modulates the Composition of Gut Microbiota in Mice. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:609992. 33776762 10.3389/fphar.2021.609992 PMC7991589

95. Lin YL Huang G Khan I Su L Xia W Law BYK Wong VKW Wu Q Wang J Leong WK Hsiao WLW Poria cocos polysaccharides exert prebiotic function to attenuate the adverse effects and improve the therapeutic outcome of 5-FU in ApcMin/+ mice Chinese Medicine 2022 17 116 10.1186/s13020-022-00667-8 36192796 PMC9531437 Lin YL, Huang G, Khan I, Su L, Xia W, Law BYK, Wong VKW, Wu Q, Wang J, Leong WK, Hsiao WLW. Poria cocos polysaccharides exert prebiotic function to attenuate the adverse effects and improve the therapeutic outcome of 5-FU in ApcMin/+ mice. Chinese Medicine. 2022;17:116. 36192796 10.1186/s13020-022-00667-8 PMC9531437

96. Huang J Liu D Wang Y Liu L Li J Yuan J Jiang Z Jiang Z Hsiao WW Liu H Ginseng polysaccharides alter the gut microbiota and kynurenine/tryptophan ratio, potentiating the antitumour effect of antiprogrammed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy Gut 2022 71 734 745 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321031 34006584 PMC8921579 Huang J, Liu D, Wang Y, Liu L, Li J, Yuan J, Jiang Z, Jiang Z, Hsiao WW, Liu H, et al. Ginseng polysaccharides alter the gut microbiota and kynurenine/tryptophan ratio, potentiating the antitumour effect of antiprogrammed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy. Gut. 2022;71:734–45. 34006584 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321031 PMC8921579

97. Lv J Jia Y Li J Kuai W Li Y Guo F Xu X Zhao Z Lv J Li Z Gegen Qinlian decoction enhances the effect of PD-1 blockade in colorectal cancer with microsatellite stability by remodelling the gut microbiota and the tumour microenvironment Cell Death Dis 2019 10 415 10.1038/s41419-019-1638-6 31138779 PMC6538740 Lv J, Jia Y, Li J, Kuai W, Li Y, Guo F, Xu X, Zhao Z, Lv J, Li Z. Gegen Qinlian decoction enhances the effect of PD-1 blockade in colorectal cancer with microsatellite stability by remodelling the gut microbiota and the tumour microenvironment. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:415. 31138779 10.1038/s41419-019-1638-6 PMC6538740

98. Lehouritis P Cummins J Stanton M Murphy CT McCarthy FO Reid G Urbaniak C Byrne WL Tangney M Local bacteria affect the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs Sci Rep 2015 5 14554 10.1038/srep14554 26416623 PMC4586607 Lehouritis P, Cummins J, Stanton M, Murphy CT, McCarthy FO, Reid G, Urbaniak C, Byrne WL, Tangney M. Local bacteria affect the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14554. 26416623 10.1038/srep14554 PMC4586607

99. Scott TA, Quintaneiro LM, Norvaisas P, Lui PP, Wilson MP, Leung K-Y, Herrera-Dominguez L, Sudiwala S, Pessia A, Clayton PT, et al. Host-Microbe Co-metabolism Dictates Cancer Drug Efficacy in C. elegans. Cell. 201;169:442–456.e418. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.040 PMC5406385 28431245

100. Daillère R Vétizou M Waldschmitt N Yamazaki T Isnard C Poirier-Colame V Duong CPM Flament C Lepage P Roberti MP Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects Immunity 2016 45 931 943 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.009 27717798 Daillère R, Vétizou M, Waldschmitt N, Yamazaki T, Isnard C, Poirier-Colame V, Duong CPM, Flament C, Lepage P, Roberti MP, et al. Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects. Immunity. 2016;45:931–43. 27717798 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.009

101. Paulos CM Wrzesinski C Kaiser A Hinrichs CS Chieppa M Cassard L Palmer DC Boni A Muranski P Yu Z Microbial translocation augments the function of adoptively transferred self/tumor-specific CD8+ T cells via TLR4 signaling J Clin Investig 2007 117 2197 2204 10.1172/JCI32205 17657310 PMC1924500 Paulos CM, Wrzesinski C, Kaiser A, Hinrichs CS, Chieppa M, Cassard L, Palmer DC, Boni A, Muranski P, Yu Z, et al. Microbial translocation augments the function of adoptively transferred self/tumor-specific CD8+ T cells via TLR4 signaling. J Clin Investig. 2007;117:2197–204. 17657310 10.1172/JCI32205 PMC1924500

102. Shiao SL Kershaw KM Limon JJ You S Yoon J Ko EY Guarnerio J Potdar AA McGovern DPB Bose S Commensal bacteria and fungi differentially regulate tumor responses to radiation therapy Cancer Cell 2021 39 1202 1213.e1206 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.002 34329585 PMC8830498 Shiao SL, Kershaw KM, Limon JJ, You S, Yoon J, Ko EY, Guarnerio J, Potdar AA, McGovern DPB, Bose S, et al. Commensal bacteria and fungi differentially regulate tumor responses to radiation therapy. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:1202-1213.e1206. 34329585 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.002 PMC8830498

103. Marchesi JR Ravel J The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal Microbiome 2015 3 31 10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5 26229597 PMC4520061 Marchesi JR, Ravel J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome. 2015;3:31. 26229597 10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5 PMC4520061

104. Fernandes MR Aggarwal P Costa RGF Cole AM Trinchieri G Targeting the gut microbiota for cancer therapy Nat Rev Cancer 2022 22 703 722 10.1038/s41568-022-00513-x 36253536 Fernandes MR, Aggarwal P, Costa RGF, Cole AM, Trinchieri G. Targeting the gut microbiota for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22:703–22. 36253536 10.1038/s41568-022-00513-x

105. Matson V Fessler J Bao R Chongsuwat T Zha Y Alegre M-L Luke JJ Gajewski TF The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients Science (New York, NY) 2018 359 104 108 10.1126/science.aao3290 PMC6707353 29302014 Matson V, Fessler J, Bao R, Chongsuwat T, Zha Y, Alegre M-L, Luke JJ, Gajewski TF. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science (New York, NY). 2018;359:104–8. 10.1126/science.aao3290 PMC6707353 29302014

106. Routy B Le Chatelier E Derosa L Duong CPM Alou MT Daillère R Fluckiger A Messaoudene M Rauber C Roberti MP Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors Science (New York, NY) 2018 359 91 97 10.1126/science.aan3706 29097494 Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, Duong CPM, Alou MT, Daillère R, Fluckiger A, Messaoudene M, Rauber C, Roberti MP, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science (New York, NY). 2018;359:91–7. 10.1126/science.aan3706 29097494

107. Baruch EN Youngster I Ben-Betzalel G Ortenberg R Lahat A Katz L Adler K Dick-Necula D Raskin S Bloch N Fecal microbiota transplant promotes response in immunotherapy-refractory melanoma patients Science (New York, NY) 2021 371 602 609 10.1126/science.abb5920 33303685 Baruch EN, Youngster I, Ben-Betzalel G, Ortenberg R, Lahat A, Katz L, Adler K, Dick-Necula D, Raskin S, Bloch N, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant promotes response in immunotherapy-refractory melanoma patients. Science (New York, NY). 2021;371:602–9. 10.1126/science.abb5920 33303685

108. Cheng WY Wu C-Y Yu J The role of gut microbiota in cancer treatment: friend or foe? Gut 2020 69 1867 1876 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321153 32759302 PMC7497589 Cheng WY, Wu C-Y, Yu J. The role of gut microbiota in cancer treatment: friend or foe? Gut. 2020;69:1867–76. 32759302 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321153 PMC7497589

109. Wang F Yin Q Chen L Davis MM Bifidobacterium can mitigate intestinal immunopathology in the context of CTLA-4 blockade Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018 115 157 161 10.1073/pnas.1712901115 29255057 PMC5776803 Wang F, Yin Q, Chen L, Davis MM. Bifidobacterium can mitigate intestinal immunopathology in the context of CTLA-4 blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:157–61. 29255057 10.1073/pnas.1712901115 PMC5776803

110. Brudno JN Kochenderfer JN Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: Mechanisms, manifestations and management Blood Rev 2019 34 45 55 10.1016/j.blre.2018.11.002 30528964 PMC6628697 Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN. Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: Mechanisms, manifestations and management. Blood Rev. 2019;34:45–55. 30528964 10.1016/j.blre.2018.11.002 PMC6628697

111. Sitthirak S Suksawat M Phetcharaburanin J Wangwiwatsin A Klanrit P Namwat N Khuntikeo N Titapun A Jarearnrat A Sangkhamanon S Loilome W Chemotherapeutic resistant cholangiocarcinoma displayed distinct intratumoral microbial composition and metabolic profiles PeerJ 2022 10 e13876 10.7717/peerj.13876 35990899 PMC9390323 Sitthirak S, Suksawat M, Phetcharaburanin J, Wangwiwatsin A, Klanrit P, Namwat N, Khuntikeo N, Titapun A, Jarearnrat A, Sangkhamanon S, Loilome W. Chemotherapeutic resistant cholangiocarcinoma displayed distinct intratumoral microbial composition and metabolic profiles. PeerJ. 2022;10: e13876. 35990899 10.7717/peerj.13876 PMC9390323

112. Cullin N Azevedo Antunes C Straussman R Stein-Thoeringer CK Elinav E Microbiome and Cancer Cancer Cell 2021 39 1317 1341 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.08.006 34506740 Cullin N, Azevedo Antunes C, Straussman R, Stein-Thoeringer CK, Elinav E. Microbiome and Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:1317–41. 34506740 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.08.006

113. Wong CC Yu J Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer development and therapy Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023 20 429 452 10.1038/s41571-023-00766-x 37169888 Wong CC, Yu J. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer development and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20:429–52. 37169888 10.1038/s41571-023-00766-x

114. Mi H Dong Y Zhang B Wang H Peter CCK Gao P Fu H Gao Y Bifidobacterium Infantis Ameliorates Chemotherapy-Induced Intestinal Mucositis Via Regulating T Cell Immunity in Colorectal Cancer Rats Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry: International Journal of Experimental Cellular Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology 2017 42 2330 2341 10.1159/000480005 28848081 Mi H, Dong Y, Zhang B, Wang H, Peter CCK, Gao P, Fu H, Gao Y. Bifidobacterium Infantis Ameliorates Chemotherapy-Induced Intestinal Mucositis Via Regulating T Cell Immunity in Colorectal Cancer Rats. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry: International Journal of Experimental Cellular Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology. 2017;42:2330–41. 28848081 10.1159/000480005

115. Al-Qadami G Van Sebille Y Le H Bowen J Gut microbiota: implications for radiotherapy response and radiotherapy-induced mucositis Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019 13 485 496 10.1080/17474124.2019.1595586 30907164 Al-Qadami G, Van Sebille Y, Le H, Bowen J. Gut microbiota: implications for radiotherapy response and radiotherapy-induced mucositis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;13:485–96. 30907164 10.1080/17474124.2019.1595586

116. Liu LS Shah K The Potential of the Gut Microbiome to Reshape the Cancer Therapy Paradigm JAMA Oncol 2022 8 1059 1067 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0494 35482355 Liu LS, Shah K. The Potential of the Gut Microbiome to Reshape the Cancer Therapy Paradigm. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:1059–67. 35482355 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0494

117. Yu T Guo F Yu Y Sun T Ma D Han J Qian Y Kryczek I Sun D Nagarsheth N Fusobacterium nucleatum Promotes Chemoresistance to Colorectal Cancer by Modulating Autophagy Cell 2017 170 548 563.e516 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.008 28753429 PMC5767127 Yu T, Guo F, Yu Y, Sun T, Ma D, Han J, Qian Y, Kryczek I, Sun D, Nagarsheth N, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum Promotes Chemoresistance to Colorectal Cancer by Modulating Autophagy. Cell. 2017;170:548-563.e516. 28753429 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.008 PMC5767127

118. Zhang N, Kandalai S, Zhou X, Hossain F, Zheng Q. Applying multi-omics toward tumor microbiome research. iMeta. 2023;2:e73. 10.1002/imt2.73 PMC10989946 38868335

119. Lee S-H Cho S-Y Yoon Y Park C Sohn J Jeong J-J Jeon B-N Jang M An C Lee S Bifidobacterium bifidum strains synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors to reduce tumour burden in mice Nat Microbiol 2021 6 277 288 10.1038/s41564-020-00831-6 33432149 Lee S-H, Cho S-Y, Yoon Y, Park C, Sohn J, Jeong J-J, Jeon B-N, Jang M, An C, Lee S, et al. Bifidobacterium bifidum strains synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors to reduce tumour burden in mice. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:277–88. 33432149 10.1038/s41564-020-00831-6

120. Eiseman B Silen W Bascom GS Kauvar AJ Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis Surgery 1958 44 854 9 13592638 Eiseman B, Silen W, Bascom GS, Kauvar AJ. Fecal enema as an adjunct in the treatment of pseudomembranous enterocolitis. Surgery. 1958;44:854–9. 13592638

121. Zhang S-L Cheng L-S Zhang Z-Y Sun H-T Li J-J Untangling determinants of gut microbiota and tumor immunologic status through a multi-omics approach in colorectal cancer Pharmacol Res 2023 188 106633 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106633 36574857 Zhang S-L, Cheng L-S, Zhang Z-Y, Sun H-T, Li J-J. Untangling determinants of gut microbiota and tumor immunologic status through a multi-omics approach in colorectal cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2023;188:106633. 36574857 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106633

122. Cao Y Xia H Tan X Shi C Ma Y Meng D Zhou M Lv Z Wang S Jin Y Intratumoural microbiota: a new frontier in cancer development and therapy Signal Transduct Target Ther 2024 9 15 10.1038/s41392-023-01693-0 38195689 PMC10776793 Cao Y, Xia H, Tan X, Shi C, Ma Y, Meng D, Zhou M, Lv Z, Wang S, Jin Y. Intratumoural microbiota: a new frontier in cancer development and therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9:15. 38195689 10.1038/s41392-023-01693-0 PMC10776793

123. Reddy BS Role of bile metabolites in colon carcinogenesis Animal models Cancer 1975 36 2401 2406 764959 10.1002/1097-0142(197512)36:6<2401::aid-cncr2820360619>3.0.co;2-o Reddy BS. Role of bile metabolites in colon carcinogenesis. Animal models. Cancer. 1975;36:2401–6. 764959 10.1002/1097-0142(197512)36:6<2401::aid-cncr2820360619>3.0.co;2-o

124. Maslowski KM Vieira AT Ng A Kranich J Sierro F Yu D Schilter HC Rolph MS Mackay F Artis D Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43 Nature 2009 461 1282 1286 10.1038/nature08530 19865172 PMC3256734 Maslowski KM, Vieira AT, Ng A, Kranich J, Sierro F, Yu D, Schilter HC, Rolph MS, Mackay F, Artis D, et al. Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature. 2009;461:1282–6. 19865172 10.1038/nature08530 PMC3256734

125. Rizvi ZA, Dalal R, Sadhu S, Kumar Y, Kumar S, Gupta SK, Tripathy MR, Rathore DK, Awasthi A. High-salt diet mediates interplay between NK cells and gut microbiota to induce potent tumor immunity. Science Advances. 2021;7:eabg5016. 10.1126/sciadv.abg5016 PMC8442882 34516769

126. Then CK, Paillas S, Moomin A, Misheva MD, Moir RA, Hay SM, Bremner D, Roberts Nee Nellany KS, Smith EE, Heidari Z, et al. Dietary fibre supplementation enhances radiotherapy tumour control and alleviates intestinal radiation toxicity. Microbiome. 2024;12:89. 10.1186/s40168-024-01804-1 PMC11092108 38745230

127. Bogdanov IG Velichkov VT Gurevich AI Dalev PG Kolosov MN Mal'kova VP Sorokina IB Khristova LN Antitumor action of glycopeptides from the cell wall of Lactobacillus bulgaricus Bull Exp Biol Med 1977 84 1750 1753 10.1007/BF00804826 597607 Bogdanov IG, Velichkov VT, Gurevich AI, Dalev PG, Kolosov MN, Mal’kova VP, Sorokina IB, Khristova LN. Antitumor action of glycopeptides from the cell wall of Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Bull Exp Biol Med. 1977;84:1750–3. 597607

128. Singh J Rivenson A Tomita M Shimamura S Ishibashi N Reddy BS Bifidobacterium longum, a lactic acid-producing intestinal bacterium inhibits colon cancer and modulates the intermediate biomarkers of colon carcinogenesis Carcinogenesis 1997 18 833 841 10.1093/carcin/18.4.833 9111222 Singh J, Rivenson A, Tomita M, Shimamura S, Ishibashi N, Reddy BS. Bifidobacterium longum, a lactic acid-producing intestinal bacterium inhibits colon cancer and modulates the intermediate biomarkers of colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18:833–41. 9111222 10.1093/carcin/18.4.833

129. Rakoff-Nahoum S Paglino J Eslami-Varzaneh F Edberg S Medzhitov R Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis Cell 2004 118 229 241 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.002 15260992 Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, Edberg S, Medzhitov R. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell. 2004;118:229–41. 15260992 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.002

130. Mazmanian SK Liu CH Tzianabos AO Kasper DL An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system Cell 2005 122 107 118 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.007 16009137 Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, Kasper DL. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell. 2005;122:107–18. 16009137 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.007

131. Zhou J Li M Chen Q Li X Chen L Dong Z Zhu W Yang Y Liu Z Chen Q Programmable probiotics modulate inflammation and gut microbiota for inflammatory bowel disease treatment after effective oral delivery Nat Commun 2022 13 3432 10.1038/s41467-022-31171-0 35701435 PMC9198027 Zhou J, Li M, Chen Q, Li X, Chen L, Dong Z, Zhu W, Yang Y, Liu Z, Chen Q. Programmable probiotics modulate inflammation and gut microbiota for inflammatory bowel disease treatment after effective oral delivery. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3432. 35701435 10.1038/s41467-022-31171-0 PMC9198027

132. Siddiqui NA Ventrola AJ Hartman AR Konare T Kamble NS Thomas SC Madaan T Kharofa J Sertorio MG Kotagiri N An Engineered Probiotic Platform for Cancer Epitope-Independent Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Solid Tumors Adv Healthc Mater 2023 12 e2202870 10.1002/adhm.202202870 36913614 PMC10497710 Siddiqui NA, Ventrola AJ, Hartman AR, Konare T, Kamble NS, Thomas SC, Madaan T, Kharofa J, Sertorio MG, Kotagiri N. An Engineered Probiotic Platform for Cancer Epitope-Independent Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Solid Tumors. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12:e2202870. 36913614 10.1002/adhm.202202870 PMC10497710

133. Peppercorn MA Goldman P The role of intestinal bacteria in the metabolism of salicylazosulfapyridine J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1972 181 555 562 10.1016/S0022-3565(25)29238-2 4402374 Peppercorn MA, Goldman P. The role of intestinal bacteria in the metabolism of salicylazosulfapyridine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1972;181:555–62. 4402374

134. Viaud S Saccheri F Mignot G Yamazaki T Daillère R Hannani D Enot DP Pfirschke C Engblom C Pittet MJ The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide Science (New York, NY) 2013 342 971 976 10.1126/science.1240537 PMC4048947 24264990 Viaud S, Saccheri F, Mignot G, Yamazaki T, Daillère R, Hannani D, Enot DP, Pfirschke C, Engblom C, Pittet MJ, et al. The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide. Science (New York, NY). 2013;342:971–6. 10.1126/science.1240537 PMC4048947 24264990

135. Wu H Leng X Liu Q Mao T Jiang T Liu Y Li F Cao C Fan J Chen L Intratumoral Microbiota Composition Regulates Chemoimmunotherapy Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Can Res 2023 83 3131 3144 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-2593 37433041 Wu H, Leng X, Liu Q, Mao T, Jiang T, Liu Y, Li F, Cao C, Fan J, Chen L, et al. Intratumoral Microbiota Composition Regulates Chemoimmunotherapy Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Can Res. 2023;83:3131–44. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-2593 37433041

136. D'Herelle F. On an invisible microbe antagonistic toward dysenteric bacilli: brief note by Mr. F. D'Herelle, presented by Mr. Roux. 1917. 2007;158:553–554. 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.07.005 17855060

137. Kantoch M Mordarski M Binding of bacterial viruses by tumor cells in vitro Postepy Higieny I Medycyny Doswiadczalnej 1958 12 191 192 13601395 Kantoch M, Mordarski M. Binding of bacterial viruses by tumor cells in vitro. Postepy Higieny I Medycyny Doswiadczalnej. 1958;12:191–2. 13601395

138. Duplessis M Lévesque CM Moineau S Characterization of Streptococcus thermophilus host range phage mutants Appl Environ Microbiol 2006 72 3036 3041 10.1128/AEM.72.4.3036-3041.2006 16598014 PMC1449016 Duplessis M, Lévesque CM, Moineau S. Characterization of Streptococcus thermophilus host range phage mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3036–41. 16598014 10.1128/AEM.72.4.3036-3041.2006 PMC1449016

139. Zheng D-W Dong X Pan P Chen K-W Fan J-X Cheng S-X Zhang X-Z Phage-guided modulation of the gut microbiota of mouse models of colorectal cancer augments their responses to chemotherapy Nature Biomedical Engineering 2019 3 717 728 10.1038/s41551-019-0423-2 31332342 Zheng D-W, Dong X, Pan P, Chen K-W, Fan J-X, Cheng S-X, Zhang X-Z. Phage-guided modulation of the gut microbiota of mouse models of colorectal cancer augments their responses to chemotherapy. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2019;3:717–28. 31332342 10.1038/s41551-019-0423-2

140. Dong X, Pan P, Zheng D-W, Bao P, Zeng X, Zhang X-Z. Bioinorganic hybrid bacteriophage for modulation of intestinal microbiota to remodel tumor-immune microenvironment against colorectal cancer. Science Advances. 2020;6:eaba1590. 10.1126/sciadv.aba1590 PMC7228756 32440552

141. Gencay YE, Jasinskytė D, Robert C, Semsey S, Martínez V, Petersen AØ, Brunner K, de Santiago Torio A, Salazar A, Turcu IC, et al. Engineered phage with antibacterial CRISPR-Cas selectively reduce E. coli burden in mice. Nature Biotechnology. 2024;42:265–274. 10.1038/s41587-023-01759-y PMC10869271 37142704

142. Cohen SN Chang AC Boyer HW Helling RB Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973 70 3240 3244 10.1073/pnas.70.11.3240 4594039 PMC427208 Cohen SN, Chang AC, Boyer HW, Helling RB. Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70:3240–4. 4594039 10.1073/pnas.70.11.3240 PMC427208

143. Pan ZK Ikonomidis G Lazenby A Pardoll D Paterson Y A recombinant Listeria monocytogenes vaccine expressing a model tumour antigen protects mice against lethal tumour cell challenge and causes regression of established tumours Nat Med 1995 1 471 477 10.1038/nm0595-471 7585097 Pan ZK, Ikonomidis G, Lazenby A, Pardoll D, Paterson Y. A recombinant Listeria monocytogenes vaccine expressing a model tumour antigen protects mice against lethal tumour cell challenge and causes regression of established tumours. Nat Med. 1995;1:471–7. 7585097 10.1038/nm0595-471

144. Zhu J Ke Y Liu Q Yang J Liu F Xu R Zhou H Chen A Xiao J Meng F Engineered Lactococcus lactis secreting Flt3L and OX40 ligand for in situ vaccination-based cancer immunotherapy Nat Commun 2022 13 7466 10.1038/s41467-022-35130-7 36463242 PMC9719518 Zhu J, Ke Y, Liu Q, Yang J, Liu F, Xu R, Zhou H, Chen A, Xiao J, Meng F, et al. Engineered Lactococcus lactis secreting Flt3L and OX40 ligand for in situ vaccination-based cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2022;13:7466. 36463242 10.1038/s41467-022-35130-7 PMC9719518

145. Qiao L Niu L Wang Z Deng Z Di D Ma X Zhou Y Kong D Wang Q Yin J Engineered bacteria for near-infrared light-inducible expression of cancer therapeutics Nature Cancer 2025 6 612 628 10.1038/s43018-025-00932-3 40097656 Qiao L, Niu L, Wang Z, Deng Z, Di D, Ma X, Zhou Y, Kong D, Wang Q, Yin J, et al. Engineered bacteria for near-infrared light-inducible expression of cancer therapeutics. Nature Cancer. 2025;6:612–28. 40097656 10.1038/s43018-025-00932-3

146. Matsumura Y Maeda H A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs Cancer Res 1986 46 6387 6392 2946403 Matsumura Y, Maeda H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 1986;46:6387–92. 2946403

147. Kabbaj M Phillips NC Anticancer activity of mycobacterial DNA: effect of formulation as chitosan nanoparticles J Drug Target 2001 9 317 328 10.3109/10611860108998768 11770702 Kabbaj M, Phillips NC. Anticancer activity of mycobacterial DNA: effect of formulation as chitosan nanoparticles. J Drug Target. 2001;9:317–28. 11770702 10.3109/10611860108998768

148. Zhu R Yuan W Xia A Sun X Yan W Wu T Wang G Li Y Yin Q Li Y Inulin-Based Nanoparticle Modulates Gut Microbiota and Immune Microenvironment for Improving Colorectal Cancer Therapy Adv Funct Mater 2024 34 2407685 10.1002/adfm.202407685 Zhu R, Yuan W, Xia A, Sun X, Yan W, Wu T, Wang G, Li Y, Yin Q, Li Y. Inulin-Based Nanoparticle Modulates Gut Microbiota and Immune Microenvironment for Improving Colorectal Cancer Therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34:2407685.

149. Teng Y Luo C Qiu X Mu J Sriwastva MK Xu Q Liu M Hu X Xu F Zhang L Plant-nanoparticles enhance anti-PD-L1 efficacy by shaping human commensal microbiota metabolites Nat Commun 2025 16 1295 10.1038/s41467-025-56498-2 39900923 PMC11790884 Teng Y, Luo C, Qiu X, Mu J, Sriwastva MK, Xu Q, Liu M, Hu X, Xu F, Zhang L, et al. Plant-nanoparticles enhance anti-PD-L1 efficacy by shaping human commensal microbiota metabolites. Nat Commun. 2025;16:1295. 39900923 10.1038/s41467-025-56498-2 PMC11790884

150. Spencer CN McQuade JL Gopalakrishnan V McCulloch JA Vetizou M Cogdill AP Khan MAW Zhang X White MG Peterson CB Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response Science (New York, NY) 2021 374 1632 1640 10.1126/science.aaz7015 PMC8970537 34941392 Spencer CN, McQuade JL, Gopalakrishnan V, McCulloch JA, Vetizou M, Cogdill AP, Khan MAW, Zhang X, White MG, Peterson CB, et al. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science (New York, NY). 2021;374:1632–40. 10.1126/science.aaz7015 PMC8970537 34941392

151. Ferrere G Tidjani Alou M Liu P Goubet A-G Fidelle M Kepp O Durand S Iebba V Fluckiger A Daillère R Ketogenic diet and ketone bodies enhance the anticancer effects of PD-1 blockade JCI insight 2021 6 e145207 145207 10.1172/jci.insight.145207 33320838 PMC7934884 Ferrere G, Tidjani Alou M, Liu P, Goubet A-G, Fidelle M, Kepp O, Durand S, Iebba V, Fluckiger A, Daillère R, et al. Ketogenic diet and ketone bodies enhance the anticancer effects of PD-1 blockade. JCI insight. 2021;6(e145207):145207. 33320838 10.1172/jci.insight.145207 PMC7934884

152. Bozzetti F The role of the nutrition in malnourished cancer patients: Revisiting an old dilemma Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2024 43 1320 1328 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.03.018 38669764 Bozzetti F. The role of the nutrition in malnourished cancer patients: Revisiting an old dilemma. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2024;43:1320–8. 38669764 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.03.018

153. Fong W Li Q Yu J Gut microbiota modulation: a novel strategy for prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer Oncogene 2020 39 4925 10.1038/s41388-020-1341-1 32514151 PMC7314664 Fong W, Li Q, Yu J. Gut microbiota modulation: a novel strategy for prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2020;39:4925. 32514151 10.1038/s41388-020-1341-1 PMC7314664

154. Montalban-Arques A Katkeviciute E Busenhart P Bircher A Wirbel J Zeller G Morsy Y Borsig L Glaus Garzon JF Müller A Commensal Clostridiales strains mediate effective anti-cancer immune response against solid tumors Cell Host Microbe 2021 29 1573 1588.e1577 10.1016/j.chom.2021.08.001 34453895 Montalban-Arques A, Katkeviciute E, Busenhart P, Bircher A, Wirbel J, Zeller G, Morsy Y, Borsig L, Glaus Garzon JF, Müller A, et al. Commensal Clostridiales strains mediate effective anti-cancer immune response against solid tumors. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:1573-1588.e1577. 34453895 10.1016/j.chom.2021.08.001

155. Davani-Davari D Negahdaripour M Karimzadeh I Seifan M Mohkam M Masoumi SJ Berenjian A Ghasemi Y Prebiotics: Definition, Types, Sources, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications Foods 2019 8 92 10.3390/foods8030092 30857316 PMC6463098 Davani-Davari D, Negahdaripour M, Karimzadeh I, Seifan M, Mohkam M, Masoumi SJ, Berenjian A, Ghasemi Y. Prebiotics: Definition, Types, Sources, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications. Foods. 2019;8:92. 30857316 10.3390/foods8030092 PMC6463098

156. Zhang S-L Mao Y-Q Zhang Z-Y Li Z-M Kong C-Y Chen H-L Cai P-R Han B Ye T Wang L-S Pectin supplement significantly enhanced the anti-PD-1 efficacy in tumor-bearing mice humanized with gut microbiota from patients with colorectal cancer Theranostics 2021 11 4155 4170 10.7150/thno.54476 33754054 PMC7977465 Zhang S-L, Mao Y-Q, Zhang Z-Y, Li Z-M, Kong C-Y, Chen H-L, Cai P-R, Han B, Ye T, Wang L-S. Pectin supplement significantly enhanced the anti-PD-1 efficacy in tumor-bearing mice humanized with gut microbiota from patients with colorectal cancer. Theranostics. 2021;11:4155–70. 33754054 10.7150/thno.54476 PMC7977465

157. Han K Nam J Xu J Sun X Huang X Animasahun O Achreja A Jeon JH Pursley B Kamada N Generation of systemic antitumour immunity via the in situ modulation of the gut microbiome by an orally administered inulin gel Nature Biomedical Engineering 2021 5 1377 1388 10.1038/s41551-021-00749-2 34168321 PMC8595497 Han K, Nam J, Xu J, Sun X, Huang X, Animasahun O, Achreja A, Jeon JH, Pursley B, Kamada N, et al. Generation of systemic antitumour immunity via the in situ modulation of the gut microbiome by an orally administered inulin gel. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2021;5:1377–88. 34168321 10.1038/s41551-021-00749-2 PMC8595497

158. Motoori M Yano M Miyata H Sugimura K Saito T Omori T Fujiwara Y Miyoshi N Akita H Gotoh K Randomized study of the effect of synbiotics during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on adverse events in esophageal cancer patients Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2017 36 93 99 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.11.008 26644166 Motoori M, Yano M, Miyata H, Sugimura K, Saito T, Omori T, Fujiwara Y, Miyoshi N, Akita H, Gotoh K, et al. Randomized study of the effect of synbiotics during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on adverse events in esophageal cancer patients. Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2017;36:93–9. 26644166 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.11.008

159. Kim KO Gluck M Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: An Update on Clinical Practice Clinical Endoscopy 2019 52 137 10.5946/ce.2019.009 30909689 PMC6453848 Kim KO, Gluck M. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: An Update on Clinical Practice. Clinical Endoscopy. 2019;52:137. 30909689 10.5946/ce.2019.009 PMC6453848

160. Hoffmann D Palumbo F Ravel J Roghmann M-C Rowthorn V von Rosenvinge E Improving regulation of microbiota transplants Science 2017 358 1390 1391 10.1126/science.aaq0034 29242336 PMC5773100 Hoffmann D, Palumbo F, Ravel J, Roghmann M-C, Rowthorn V, von Rosenvinge E. Improving regulation of microbiota transplants. Science. 2017;358:1390–1. 29242336 10.1126/science.aaq0034 PMC5773100

161. Yadegar A Bar-Yoseph H Monaghan TM Pakpour S Severino A Kuijper EJ Smits WK Terveer EM Neupane S Nabavi-Rad A Fecal microbiota transplantation: current challenges and future landscapes Clin Microbiol Rev 2024 37 e00060 e22 10.1128/cmr.00060-22 38717124 PMC11325845 Yadegar A, Bar-Yoseph H, Monaghan TM, Pakpour S, Severino A, Kuijper EJ, Smits WK, Terveer EM, Neupane S, Nabavi-Rad A, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation: current challenges and future landscapes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024;37:e00060-e22. 38717124 10.1128/cmr.00060-22 PMC11325845

162. Lopetuso LR, Deleu S, Puca P, Abreu MT, Armuzzi A, Barbara G, Caprioli F, Chieng S, Costello SP, Damiani A, et al. Guidance for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Trials in Ulcerative Colitis: The Second ROME Consensus Conference. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2025;izaf013. Advance online publicaton. 10.1093/ibd/izaf013 PMC12455609 39932857

163. Cieplak T, Soffer N, Sulakvelidze A, Nielsen DS. A bacteriophage cocktail targeting Escherichia coli reduces E. coli in simulated gut conditions, while preserving a non-targeted representative commensal normal microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2018;9:391–399. 10.1080/19490976.2018.1447291 PMC6219645 29517960

164. Guan G-f Zhao M, Liu L-m, Jin C-s, Sun K, Zhang D-j, Yu D-j, Cao H-w, Lu Y-q, Wen L-j: Salmonella typhimurium mediated delivery of Apoptin in human laryngeal cancer Int J Med Sci 2013 10 1639 1648 10.7150/ijms.6960 24155656 PMC3805922 Guan G-f. Zhao M, Liu L-m, Jin C-s, Sun K, Zhang D-j, Yu D-j, Cao H-w, Lu Y-q, Wen L-j. Salmonella typhimurium mediated delivery of Apoptin in human laryngeal cancer. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10:1639–48. 24155656 10.7150/ijms.6960 PMC3805922

165. Din MO Danino T Prindle A Skalak M Selimkhanov J Allen K Julio E Atolia E Tsimring LS Bhatia SN Hasty J Synchronized cycles of bacterial lysis for in vivo delivery Nature 2016 536 81 85 10.1038/nature18930 27437587 PMC5048415 Din MO, Danino T, Prindle A, Skalak M, Selimkhanov J, Allen K, Julio E, Atolia E, Tsimring LS, Bhatia SN, Hasty J. Synchronized cycles of bacterial lysis for in vivo delivery. Nature. 2016;536:81–5. 27437587 10.1038/nature18930 PMC5048415

166. Shen HS Aggarwal N Wun KS Lee YS Hwang IY Chang MW Engineered microbial systems for advanced drug delivery Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022 187 15 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114364 35654214 Shen HS, Aggarwal N, Wun KS, Lee YS, Hwang IY, Chang MW. Engineered microbial systems for advanced drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;187:15. 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114364 35654214

167. Adams BL The Next Generation of Synthetic Biology Chassis: Moving Synthetic Biology from the Laboratory to the Field ACS Synth Biol 2016 5 1328 1330 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00256 27665861 Adams BL. The Next Generation of Synthetic Biology Chassis: Moving Synthetic Biology from the Laboratory to the Field. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5:1328–30. 27665861 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00256

168. Canale FP Basso C Antonini G Perotti M Li N Sokolovska A Neumann J James MJ Geiger S Jin W Metabolic modulation of tumours with engineered bacteria for immunotherapy Nature 2021 598 662 666 10.1038/s41586-021-04003-2 34616044 Canale FP, Basso C, Antonini G, Perotti M, Li N, Sokolovska A, Neumann J, James MJ, Geiger S, Jin W, et al. Metabolic modulation of tumours with engineered bacteria for immunotherapy. Nature. 2021;598:662–6. 34616044 10.1038/s41586-021-04003-2

169. Lobo N Brooks NA Zlotta AR Cirillo JD Boorjian S Black PC Meeks JJ Bivalacqua TJ Gontero P Steinberg GD 100 years of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy: from cattle to COVID-19 Nat Rev Urol 2021 18 611 622 10.1038/s41585-021-00481-1 34131332 PMC8204595 Lobo N, Brooks NA, Zlotta AR, Cirillo JD, Boorjian S, Black PC, Meeks JJ, Bivalacqua TJ, Gontero P, Steinberg GD, et al. 100 years of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy: from cattle to COVID-19. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18:611–22. 34131332 10.1038/s41585-021-00481-1 PMC8204595

170. Redenti A Im J Redenti B Li F Rouanne M Sheng Z Sun W Gurbatri CR Huang S Komaranchath M Probiotic neoantigen delivery vectors for precision cancer immunotherapy Nature 2024 635 453 61 10.1038/s41586-024-08033-4 39415001 PMC11560847 Redenti A, Im J, Redenti B, Li F, Rouanne M, Sheng Z, Sun W, Gurbatri CR, Huang S, Komaranchath M, et al. Probiotic neoantigen delivery vectors for precision cancer immunotherapy. Nature. 2024;635:453–61. 39415001 10.1038/s41586-024-08033-4 PMC11560847

171. Ramirez JEV Sharpe LA Peppas NA Current state and challenges in developing oral vaccines Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017 114 116 131 10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.008 28438674 PMC6132247 Ramirez JEV, Sharpe LA, Peppas NA. Current state and challenges in developing oral vaccines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;114:116–31. 28438674 10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.008 PMC6132247

172. Subhan MA Yalamarty SSK Filipczak N Parveen F Torchilin VP Recent Advances in Tumor Targeting via EPR Effect for Cancer Treatment J Personalized Med 2021 11 571 10.3390/jpm11060571 PMC8234032 34207137 Subhan MA, Yalamarty SSK, Filipczak N, Parveen F, Torchilin VP. Recent Advances in Tumor Targeting via EPR Effect for Cancer Treatment. J Personalized Med. 2021;11:571. 10.3390/jpm11060571 PMC8234032 34207137

173. Cern A Skoczen SL Snapp KS Hod A Zilbersheid D Bavli Y Alon-Maimon T Bachrach G Wei X Berman B Nano-mupirocin as tumor-targeted antibiotic: Physicochemical, immunotoxicological and pharmacokinetic characterization, and effect on gut microbiome Journal of Controlled Release: Official Journal of the Controlled Release Society 2024 373 713 726 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.07.045 39038544 PMC11638845 Cern A, Skoczen SL, Snapp KS, Hod A, Zilbersheid D, Bavli Y, Alon-Maimon T, Bachrach G, Wei X, Berman B, et al. Nano-mupirocin as tumor-targeted antibiotic: Physicochemical, immunotoxicological and pharmacokinetic characterization, and effect on gut microbiome. Journal of Controlled Release: Official Journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2024;373:713–26. 39038544 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.07.045 PMC11638845

174. Song W Tiruthani K Wang Y Shen L Hu M Dorosheva O Qiu K Kinghorn KA Liu R Huang L Trapping of Lipopolysaccharide to Promote Immunotherapy against Colorectal Cancer and Attenuate Liver Metastasis Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla) 2018 30 e1805007 10.1002/adma.201805007 30387230 PMC6580426 Song W, Tiruthani K, Wang Y, Shen L, Hu M, Dorosheva O, Qiu K, Kinghorn KA, Liu R, Huang L. Trapping of Lipopolysaccharide to Promote Immunotherapy against Colorectal Cancer and Attenuate Liver Metastasis. Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla). 2018;30:e1805007. 30387230 10.1002/adma.201805007 PMC6580426

175. Toyofuku M Nomura N Eberl L Types and origins of bacterial membrane vesicles Nat Rev Microbiol 2019 17 13 24 10.1038/s41579-018-0112-2 30397270 Toyofuku M, Nomura N, Eberl L. Types and origins of bacterial membrane vesicles. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:13–24. 30397270 10.1038/s41579-018-0112-2

176. Kaparakis-Liaskos M Ferrero RL Immune modulation by bacterial outer membrane vesicles Nat Rev Immunol 2015 15 375 387 10.1038/nri3837 25976515 Kaparakis-Liaskos M, Ferrero RL. Immune modulation by bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:375–87. 25976515 10.1038/nri3837

177. Li M Zhou H Yang C Wu Y Zhou X Liu H Wang Y Bacterial outer membrane vesicles as a platform for biomedical applications: An update J Control Release 2020 323 253 268 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.031 32333919 Li M, Zhou H, Yang C, Wu Y, Zhou X, Liu H, Wang Y. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles as a platform for biomedical applications: An update. J Control Release. 2020;323:253–68. 32333919 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.031

178. Chen Y Zhang Y Dai M Qiu C Sun Q Fan T Guo Y Zhao L Jiang Y γ-Linolenic acid derived from Lactobacillus plantarum MM89 induces ferroptosis in colorectal cancer Food Funct 2025 16 1760 71 10.1039/D4FO04790G 39924991 Chen Y, Zhang Y, Dai M, Qiu C, Sun Q, Fan T, Guo Y, Zhao L, Jiang Y. γ-Linolenic acid derived from Lactobacillus plantarum MM89 induces ferroptosis in colorectal cancer. Food Funct. 2025;16:1760–71. 39924991 10.1039/d4fo04790g

179. Wang M Liu K Bao W Hang B Chen X Zhu X Li G Liu L Xiang H Hu H Gut microbiota protect against colorectal tumorigenesis through lncRNA Snhg9 Dev Cell 2025 S1534–5807 1524 00734 732 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.12.013 39755115 Wang M, Liu K, Bao W, Hang B, Chen X, Zhu X, Li G, Liu L, Xiang H, Hu H, et al. Gut microbiota protect against colorectal tumorigenesis through lncRNA Snhg9. Dev Cell. 2025;S1534–5807(1524):00734–732. 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.12.013 39755115

180. Zhang R Zhang X Lau HCH Yu J Gut microbiota in cancer initiation, development and therapy Sci China Life Sci 2024 68 1283 308 10.1007/s11427-024-2831-x 39821827 Zhang R, Zhang X, Lau HCH, Yu J. Gut microbiota in cancer initiation, development and therapy. Sci China Life Sci. 2024;68:1283–308. 39821827 10.1007/s11427-024-2831-x

181. Wang Y Qiu X Chu A Chen J Wang L Sun X Wang B Yuan Y Gong Y Advances in 16S rRNA-Based Microbial Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Microb Biotechnol 2025 18 e70115 10.1111/1751-7915.70115 39992270 PMC11849407 Wang Y, Qiu X, Chu A, Chen J, Wang L, Sun X, Wang B, Yuan Y, Gong Y. Advances in 16S rRNA-Based Microbial Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis. Microb Biotechnol. 2025;18:e70115. 39992270 10.1111/1751-7915.70115 PMC11849407

182. Khanna S Assi M Lee C Yoho D Louie T Knapple W Aguilar H Garcia-Diaz J Wang GP Berry SM Efficacy and Safety of RBX2660 in PUNCH CD3, a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with a Bayesian Primary Analysis for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection Drugs 2022 82 1527 1538 10.1007/s40265-022-01797-x 36287379 PMC9607700 Khanna S, Assi M, Lee C, Yoho D, Louie T, Knapple W, Aguilar H, Garcia-Diaz J, Wang GP, Berry SM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of RBX2660 in PUNCH CD3, a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with a Bayesian Primary Analysis for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection. Drugs. 2022;82:1527–38. 36287379 10.1007/s40265-022-01797-x PMC9607700

183. Feuerstadt P Louie TJ Lashner B Wang EEL Diao L Bryant JA Sims M Kraft CS Cohen SH Berenson CS SER-109, an Oral Microbiome Therapy for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection N Engl J Med 2022 386 220 229 10.1056/NEJMoa2106516 35045228 Feuerstadt P, Louie TJ, Lashner B, Wang EEL, Diao L, Bryant JA, Sims M, Kraft CS, Cohen SH, Berenson CS, et al. SER-109, an Oral Microbiome Therapy for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:220–9. 35045228 10.1056/NEJMoa2106516

184. Brödel AK Charpenay LH Galtier M Fuche FJ Terrasse R Poquet C Havránek J Pignotti S Krawczyk A Arraou M In situ targeted base editing of bacteria in the mouse gut Nature 2024 632 877 884 10.1038/s41586-024-07681-w 38987595 PMC11338833 Brödel AK, Charpenay LH, Galtier M, Fuche FJ, Terrasse R, Poquet C, Havránek J, Pignotti S, Krawczyk A, Arraou M, et al. In situ targeted base editing of bacteria in the mouse gut. Nature. 2024;632:877–84. 38987595 10.1038/s41586-024-07681-w PMC11338833

185. Zhang Z Yu Z Wang J Yu Y Li L Sun P Fan X Xu Q Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for efficient production of L-5-hydroxytryptophan from glucose Microb Cell Fact 2022 21 198 10.1186/s12934-022-01920-3 36153615 PMC9509612 Zhang Z, Yu Z, Wang J, Yu Y, Li L, Sun P, Fan X, Xu Q. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for efficient production of L-5-hydroxytryptophan from glucose. Microb Cell Fact. 2022;21:198. 36153615 10.1186/s12934-022-01920-3 PMC9509612

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты