m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Cell death discovery · 2022

The roles of osteoprotegerin in cancer, far beyond a bone player.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Wang Y, Liu Y, Huang Z, Chen X, Zhang B

Аннотация

Osteoprotegerin (OPG), also known as tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11B (TNFRSF11B), is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily. Characterized by its ability to bind to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), OPG is critically involved in bone remodeling. Emerging evidence implies that OPG is far beyond a bone-specific modulator, and is involved in multiple physiological and pathological processes, such as immunoregulation, vascular function, and fibrosis. Notably, numerous preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted to assess the participation of OPG in tumorigenesis and cancer development. Mechanistic studies have demonstrated that OPG is involved in multiple hallmarks of cancer, including tumor survival, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), neo-angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. In this review, we systematically summarize the basis and advances of OPG from its molecular structure to translational applications. In addition to its role in bone homeostasis, the physiological and pathological impacts of OPG on human health and its function in cancer progression are reviewed, providing a comprehensive understanding of OPG. We aim to draw more attention to OPG in the field of cancer, and to propose it as a promising diagnostic or prognostic biomarker as well as potential therapeutic target for cancer.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Facts

OPG is well-recognized for its participation in bone homeostasis and the skeletal metastasis of cancer. Emerging evidence has revealed versatile roles of OPG in human physiological and pathological processes, such as vascular formation, immune modulation and fibrosis. Except for the RANKL and TRAIL, the regulation of OPG functional activity and expression levels are modulated by various other ligands and signaling pathways. OPG is widely expressed in numerous types of cancer cells. Advances in the field of cancer have unveiled the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value of OPG in various cancers, especially bone metastasis. The roles of OPG in cancer are far from clear, and more research is needed to completely elucidate the involvement of OPG in cancers.

Open Questions

The published results regarding the impact of OPG on some types of cancer are inconsistent and even contradictory. How can these discrepancies be explained? RANKL and OPG are considered antagonistic effectors in most cases. However, independent researches studies have shown that they may fulfil concurrent functions in cancers. Do these two proteins have conflicting therapeutic applications in cancers? How can we better understand the relationship between these two cancer players? The levels of OPG in different forms and compartments (mRNA, intracellular OPG protein and serum OPG protein) are often discordant. What is the molecular mechanism underlying this discrepancy? Which index is most important for cancer diagnosis or prognosis? As a secreted protein, OPG is competent for acting as a signaling molecule between different cells. Is it more important to identify the main source of secreted OPG in a particular micro-environment than to focus on the expression pattern of OPG in cancer cells? How can the antitumor effect of OPG be selectively improved to broaden its therapeutic prospects?

Introduction

As a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, OPG is well recognized for its protective effect against excessive bone resorption [ 1 ]. Overall, OPG protein contains a signal peptide and seven functional domains. After proteolytic cleavage of the signal peptide and homodimerization, the mature form of OPG is secreted from the cytoplasm to the extracellular compartment [ 2 ] (Fig. 1 ). Fig. 1 Molecular structure and maturation process of secreted OPG. The signaling peptide is removed from full length OPG molecule before being secreted. The secreted OPG is a homodimer linked by disulfide bonds. AA, amino acid, D (1–7) domain (1–7).

Fig. 1 Molecular structure and maturation process of secreted OPG. The signaling peptide is removed from full length OPG molecule before being secreted. The secreted OPG is a homo…
Fig. 1 Molecular structure and maturation process of secreted OPG. The signaling peptide is removed from full length OPG molecule before being secreted. The secreted OPG is a homodimer linked by disulfide bonds. AA, amino acid, D (1–7) domain (1–7).

By binding to RANKL, OPG suppresses the maturation and activation of pre-osteoclasts via antagonizing RANK/RANKL signaling (Fig. 2 ), thus inhibiting osteoclast function and promoting bone formation [ 3 ]. Therefore, attenuated OPG expression or an impaired RANKL/OPG ratio results in osteoporosis [ 4 ], rheumatoid arthritis [ 5 ], or periodontitis [ 6 ]. Another well-recognized endogenous ligand of OPG is TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). OPG hinders the interaction between TRAIL and its death receptors (DRs), and thus blocks TRAIL-induced apoptosis [ 7 ] (Fig. 2 ). The crucial roles of RANKL and TRAIL signaling in the development of the immune system and various stages of tumor progression potentiate OPG as a key player in cancer formation and progression. In fact, as a secreted protein, the clinical significance of OPG has been studied in several tumors including breast cancer, prostate cancer (PCa), multiple myeloma (MM), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In these studies, OPG exhibits its capacity as a predictive index of bone metastasis, a diagnostic or prognostic marker of malignancies. Moreover, the therapeutic effect of OPG was investigated in established mouse models of MM [ 8 , 9 ] and in tumor bone metastasis [ 10 ] by using exogenous bioactive OPG. Fig. 2 OPG-related signaling pathways. OPG is secreted in a homodimeric form. By binding with RANKL and TRAIL, OPG exerts its inhibitory effects on their downstream signaling pathways. Besides, OPG itself is regulated by many signaling pathway. Imbalanced signaling cross-talks between PI3K/AKT, p38/MAPK, wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β, mTOR and OPG contribute to the pathological cell behaviors. Other ligands, such as E2, vWF, FVIII-vWF and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), bind with secreted OPG to impede its function. DR death receptor.

Fig. 2 OPG-related signaling pathways. OPG is secreted in a homodimeric form. By binding with RANKL and TRAIL, OPG exerts its inhibitory effects on their downstream signaling path…
Fig. 2 OPG-related signaling pathways. OPG is secreted in a homodimeric form. By binding with RANKL and TRAIL, OPG exerts its inhibitory effects on their downstream signaling pathways. Besides, OPG itself is regulated by many signaling pathway. Imbalanced signaling cross-talks between PI3K/AKT, p38/MAPK, wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β, mTOR and OPG contribute to the pathological cell behaviors. Other ligands, such as E2, vWF, FVIII-vWF and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), bind with secreted OPG to impede its function. DR death receptor.

Molecular structure and expression of OPG

Independently identified by Simonet et al. [ 1 ] and Tsuda et al. [ 11 ] in 1997, OPG was previously named osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (OCIF), TNF receptor-related molecule-1 (TR-1) or follicular dendritic cell receptor-1 (FDCR-1). It was eventually named osteoprotegerin (OPG) in 2000 [ 12 ], due to its major function in bone homeostasis. OPG is encoded at chromosome 8q23-24, and is a secreted protein without a transmembrane region [ 3 ]. Biochemically, full length OPG protein, with a monomeric weight of 55–62 kDa, is 401 amino acids long and contains a signal peptide of 21 amino acids, which is then proteolytically cleaved to yield a 380 amino acid form (Fig. 1 ). There are four cysteine-rich N-terminal domains (domains 1–4), two death domain homologous regions (domains 5 and 6), and a C-terminal heparin-binding domain (domain 7) [ 2 ] (Fig. 1 ). OPG is secreted as a homodimer linked by disulfide bonds within 4 or 5 potential glycosylation sites, resulting in a mature secreted form of 110–120 kDa. In this process, the cysteine at position 400 is essential for homodimerization. The OPG dimer has the highest heparin-binding ability and the highest calcium-lowering ability [ 3 ].

Different cells express and secrete OPG in bone marrow, including osteoblasts, B cells, megakaryocytes, platelets, vascular endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells [ 1 ]. In addition to skeletal expression, OPG expression is also detected in many tissues including the heart, kidney, liver and spleen [ 13 ].

Physiological function of OPG

Bone remodeling

The delicate balance between osteolytic and osteoblastic activity in bone depends mainly on two major cell types: mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) derived osteoblasts and myeloid lineage-derived osteoclasts [ 2 , 14 ]. The RANKL/RANK/OPG axis is the utmost determinant of bone remodeling. Total bone mineral density is decreased in OPG −/− mice, resulting in severe trabecular and cortical porosity, thin parietal bone, and a high incidence of fractures [ 15 ]. The bone protective effect of OPG is also supported by a report of a 100,000-bp homozygous deletion of OPG in two young patients with Paget’s disease, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by increased bone remodeling, osteopenia and frequent fractures [ 16 ]. The imbalance of OPG/RANKL leads to a series of bone diseases including osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and periodontitis, manifesting as excessive activation of osteoclast activity and an increased RANKL/OPG ratio [ 6 , 17 , 18 ]. Numerous literatures have detailed the functions of OPG in skeletal disease, but this topic is not the main focus of this review and can be referred to Kearns et al. [ 19 ].

Vascular biology

The function of OPG in vascular biology was first revealed by the observation that OPG-deficient mice suffered marked calcification of the aorta and renal arteries [ 15 ]. Di et al. reported that OPG regulated insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) expression and activity could modulate vascular smooth muscle cell calcification in vitro [ 20 ]. Deletion of OPG in apolipoprotein E knockout mice accelerated calcified atherosclerosis, suggesting that OPG can prevent such process of atherosclerosis [ 16 ]. Gordin et al. reported that serum OPG was an independent indicator of cardiovascular complications in adults with type 1 diabetes; OPG might play a role in extraosseous calcification, resulting in atherosclerosis and subsequent vascular dysfunction [ 21 ]. Moreover, elevated serum OPG levels were detected in patients with carotid calcification [ 22 ]. Furthermore, serum OPG levels demonstrated a prognostic value independent of other known predictors of mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction [ 23 ].

Immunity modulator

OPG-dependent self-regulation of microfold cell differentiation was discovered by Kimura et al. [ 24 ], who demonstrated that OPG expressed by microfold cells suppressed the differentiation of adjacent follicle-associated epithelial cells into microfold cells, and thus created a weakened immune microenvironment [ 24 ]. The accumulation of type 1 transitional B cells and isotype class switch defects were observed in OPG −/− mice, suggesting the role of OPG in regulating B cell maturation and development [ 25 ]. In vitro experiments revealed that, OPG activated Akt/PI3K signaling pathway in endothelial cells (ECs), subsequently leading to the recruitment and adhesion of monocytes [ 26 ]. OPG mediated negative regulation of the transcription factor Spi-B during the development of medullary thymic epithelial cells weakened the proliferative ability of regulatory T cells and inhibited tumor development in mice [ 27 ], suggesting a regulatory role of OPG in antitumor immunity.

Fibrosis

Recently, OPG has been found to be involved in fibrosis, which is characterized by the excessive formation and accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins generated by myofibroblasts [ 28 ]. The administration of exogenous OPG to chondrosarcoma cells lowered the expression of both mRNA and protein of matrix metalloprotease-13 [ 29 ], which is considered an important anti-fibrotic factor. Adhyatmika et al. reported that OPG produced by liver tissue promoted fibrogenesis in a transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) dependent manner, and this was restrained by treatment with the TGF-β receptor kinase inhibitor galunisertib (LY2157299) [ 30 ]. To develop noninvasive approaches to assess liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases, Bosselut et al. constructed a score-based blood test for liver fibrosis involving OPG, which showed an improved diagnostic accuracy compared to existing scoring systems [ 31 ]. Compared with healthy livers, fibrotic livers in humans and mice had increased OPG levels, resulting in an increased expression of genes associated with fibrogenesis through TGF-β1 [ 32 ].

Regulation of OPG expression

As one of the most important ligands of OPG, RANKL produced by osteoblasts binds to RANK on the surface of osteoclast precursors and recruits the cohesive protein TRAF6, resulting in the activation of NF-κB and translocation to the nucleus. This subsequently leads to the increased expression of c-Fos, which interacts with nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) to trigger the transcription of osteoclast genes [ 16 ]. The downstream signaling pathway initiated by RANKL activation also includes PI3K, ERK, JNK, and p38/MAPK [ 33 ] (Fig. 2 ). Besides, a membrane receptor called leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 4 (LRG4) of RANKL was recently identified. RANKL binds to the extracellular domain of LGR4 and negatively regulates osteoclastogenesis by activating Gαq/GS3K-β signaling and inhibiting the NFATc1 pathway [ 2 ]. OPG restrains this process by binding to extracellular RANKL (Fig. 2 ). Meanwhile, screening of OPG protein with TNF-related ligands resulted in the discovery that OPG binds to TRAIL, thus preventing its interaction with death receptors and blocking TRAIL-induced apoptosis in a human T lymphocyte cell line named Jurkat [ 7 ]. Reciprocally, OPG mRNA expression was significantly inhibited by TRAIL stimulation in normal human bone marrow-derived stromal cells [ 34 ] (Fig. 2 ).

Numerous signaling molecules or pathways have been demonstrated to regulate the expression of OPG (Fig. 2 ). Boyce et al. reported that β-catenin together with T-cell factor proteins regulated the expression of OPG in mouse osteoblasts [ 35 ]. TGF-β upregulated OPG and downregulated RANKL in osteoblasts through the canonical β-catenin dependent Wnt signaling pathway [ 28 , 36 ]. However, the exogenous administration of TGF-β1 to oral squamous cell carcinoma cells upregulated RANKL and downregulated OPG [ 37 ]. Additionally, the activation of p38MAPK signaling increased the expression of OPG in HCC and mouse mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [ 38 , 39 ]. However, Hao et al. demonstrated that the OPG expression was negatively regulated by p38MAPK in pre-osteoblast cells [ 40 ]. The female sex hormone estradiol was found to upregulate OPG and thus interfere with RANKL/RANK signal activation, which explains the tendency of elderly women to suffer from osteoporosis due to the decreased production of estradiol [ 41 ]. The deletion of Notch1 in osteoblast lineage cells promoted osteoclastogenesis by decreasing the OPG/RANKL expression ratio [ 42 ]. Qiang et al. reported that Wnt3a-regulated OPG and RANKL expression was disrupted by MM cell-derived DKK1, a soluble inhibitor of canonical Wnt signaling in osteoblasts [ 43 ].

In addition to RANKL and TRAIL, OPG was also found to bind to von Willebrand factor (vWF), and was subsequently stored within Weibel-Palade (WP) bodies, which fused with the outer membrane of endothelial cells and released their contents into the plasma when activated [ 44 ]. Likewise, the FVIII/vWF complex is capable of binding to OPG, which blocks the interaction of OPG with TRAIL, indicating the potential of the FVIII/vWF complex in tumorigenesis [ 26 ]. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the surface of cultured myeloma cell lines were found to bind to OPG, subsequently leading to its internalization and degradation [ 45 ].

OPG mediated hallmarks of cancer

OPG was found to prevent cell apoptosis and promote tumor survival. Lane et al. reported that OPG inhibited the TRAIL-mediated apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells in an α v β 3 and α v β 5 integrin-dependent manner [ 46 ]. In inflammatory breast cancer, OPG interacted with glucose-regulated protein/binding immunoglobulin protein (GRP78/BiP), the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone and master regulator of the unfolded protein response, to promote cell apoptosis and prolong the survival of inflammatory breast cancer cells [ 47 ]. By forming complexes with the lipid raft core protein Cav-1 and EGFR, RANK promoted gastric cancer cell migration, and this effect was mitigated by OPG [ 48 ]. Recombinant OPG (rOPG) restrained breast cancer stemness by suppressing the β-catenin pathway, thus inhibiting tumor growth, EMT, and metastasis in orthotopic breast cancer xenografts [ 49 ].

The role of OPG has also been elaborated in angiogenesis, a process essential for the maintenance, development, and progression of malignancies. Cross et al. reported that the expression of OPG in the endothelium of malignant colorectal, breast, and metastatic cancer tumors was higher than that in benign tumors or in normal tissues. Exogenous stimulation with OPG facilitated the formation of cord-like structures by endothelial cells in vitro [ 50 ]. In addition, α v β 3 was found indispensable for the resistance to apoptosis by administration of rOPG in human microvascular endothelial cells [ 51 ]. Benslimane et al. reported that OPG combined with fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) promoted neovascularization in vivo, accompanied by the activation of proangiogenic pathways involving MAPK signaling pathway, as well as Akt or mTOR cascades in endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) [ 52 ]. Moreover, OPG-pretreated ECFCs secreted stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), which promoted neovascularization in ischemic tissue [ 53 ].

Role of OPG in cancers

OPG in cancer bone metastasis

Bone is one of the most common sites of cancer metastasis, especially for prostate, breast, and lung cancer [ 54 ]. Given the crucial role of OPG in bone homeostasis, the involvement of OPG in cancer bone metastasis has been widely investigated. Among the bone markers tALP, NTX, BSP, P1NP, bALP, TRAP, and OPG, this last marker displayed the highest sensitivity and accuracy for identifying bone metastases of PCa [ 55 ]. In the reseach of benign prostatic hyperplasia, primary and metastatic PCa disease, elevated OPG mRNA expression was found in metastatic tumor tissues compared to local disease. A higher RANKL/OPG ratio was observed in tumors with bone metastases than in normal prostate tissues [ 56 ]. Using conditionally replicating adenoviruses (CRAds), Jung et al. demonstrated that overexpressing OPG suppressed osteoclastogenesis in vitro and inhibited the progression of advanced PCa bone metastases [ 57 ]. Corey et al. reported that increased expression of OPG in C4-2 PCa cells did not inhibit its proliferation directly, but suppressed the growth of skeletal metastatic PCa tumors [ 58 ]. By testing serum OPG and RANKL levels, Elfa et al. concluded that the sensitivity and specificity of serum OPG in detecting bone metastasis in breast cancer patients were 59% and 92%, respectively, while the corresponding values for the RANKL/OPG ratio were 73% and 72%, respectively [ 59 ]. In liver cancer, Huang et al. reported that the long noncoding RNA H19 promoted HCC bone metastasis by attenuating OPG expression to create a pro-metastatic bone microenvironment [ 39 ].

With the ability to inhibit osteoclast activity and prevent the vicious cycle of osteoclast-tumor cell interactions, bisphosphonates are commonly administered to clinical patients with bone metastases. Rachner et al. found that the TRAIL/OPG ratio was increased by zoledronic acid (ZA) in TRAIL-sensitive MDA-MB-231 cells, suggesting that the TRAIL/OPG cytokine system is among the bisphosphonate-responsive targets in breast cancer in vitro [ 60 ]. After 12 months of treatment with ZA, a decrease in the RANKL/OPG ratio was observed, indicating that ZA decreased osteoclast activity by modulating RANKL and OPG expression [ 61 ].

OPG in breast cancer

A nested case control study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort revealed that higher serum OPG levels might be a novel risk factor for ER-negative breast cancer [ 62 ]. In addition, in the EPIC cohort, Sarink et al. found that high concentrations of serum OPG were associated with elevated breast cancer specific and overall mortality, especially in those with ER-positive breast cancer [ 63 ]. In the Tromsø study, serum OPG was correlated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in women <60 years after adjustment. However, a worse prognosis was associated with patients with OPG levels in the upper quartile [ 64 ]. RANKL and OPG levels were reported to be upregulated in patients with breast cancer, and OPG was associated with the burden of bone metastases according to Mountzios et al. [ 65 ]. While BRAC1/2 mutation is a risk factor for breast cancer, lower serum OPG levels were correlated with the germline mutations of BRAC1/2 known to facilitate breast cancer risk [ 66 ]. Musculoskeletal toxicity is the major adverse effect of aromatase inhibitor therapy, which significantly affects the quality of life of patients. Lintermans et al. found that the SNP rs2073618 in OPG was associated with an elevated risk of musculoskeletal symptoms and pain after aromatase inhibitor therapy [ 67 ].

OPG in prostate cancer

Based on a strong negative correlation between endogenous OPG levels and TRAIL-induced apoptosis in vitro, Holen et al. concluded that OPG produced by PCa might be a considerable survival factor in hormone-resistant PCa cells [ 68 ]. In addition to predicting bone metastasis, OPG was found by multivariate regression analysis to be an independent prognostic factor for PCa related death [ 55 ]. Conditioned medium from PCa cells stimulated osteoclast formation, and this effect could be weakened by pre-exposure of osteoblasts to NF-κB inhibitor parthenolide (PTN), which reduced RANKL/OPG ratio [ 69 ]. By analyzing the correlation of p53 and the OPG/RANKL axis in PCa, Velletri et al. demonstrated that the loss of p53 was associated with high OPG levels both in vivo and in vitro, and that this predicted poor prognosis [ 70 ].

OPG in multiple myeloma

As one of the major features of MM, osteolytic lesions are caused by the excessive activation of osteoclasts and inhibition of osteoblasts [ 71 ]. Therefore, the imbalance in OPG/RANKL signaling has attracted much attention. Goranova-Marinova et al. found that serum OPG, RANKL, and RANKL/OPG ratios were significantly higher in MM patients than in healthy controls [ 72 ]. Inactivation of osteoclasts and trabecular bone loss in the vertebrae and tibiae was observed in mice following systemic administration of OPG expressing MSCs, suggesting the protective effect of OPG in MM [ 73 ].

OPG/RANKL is also used as a marker of bone remodeling. After the administration of two doses of lenalidomide, serum RANKL level, as well as the RANKL/OPG ratio, was significantly reduced, whereas serum OPG was elevated [ 71 ]. In a study of 104 patients who received at least 1 cycle of bortezomib, serum RANKL declined significantly, but serum OPG levels remained unchanged, causing a drop in the RANKL/OPG ratio [ 74 ]. The therapeutic effect of ZA was evaluated by measuring bone turnover markers including OPG. Interestingly, OPG levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were higher after 3 months of ZA therapy in patients with 5 or more bone metastases [ 75 ]. After analyzing the genotypes of 3774 MM patients of European ancestry, rs4407910 at 8q24.12 (odds ratio = 1.38, P = 4.09 × 10 −9 ) and rs74676832 at 19q13.43 (odds ratio = 1.97, P = 9.33 × 10 −7 ) showed the strongest association with MM bone disease (MBD). These data further support and highlight the role of OPG in the development of MM [ 76 ].

OPG in hepatocellular carcinoma

By analyzing 40 pairs of tumor tissues and corresponding adjacent normal tissues utilizing real-time PCR, Jiang et al. found that RANK and OPG levels were elevated in tumor tissue [ 77 ]. The prognostic value of serum OPG in HCC was reported by Zhang et al., who revealed that high serum OPG levels were correlated with worse prognosis and OPG was an independent risk factor for liver cancer [ 78 ]. A prediction model for early stage hepatitis B-related liver cancer containing five proteins including OPG was established by Cheng et al. [ 79 ], demonstrating the potential diagnostic value of OPG.

Gao et al. observed lower mRNA expression of OPG in highly metastatic HCC cell lines (MHCC97H, HCCLM3, and Sk-Hep1) compared to lines with low metastatic potential (HuH7 and HepG2) [ 80 ]. Long non-coding RNA H19 was found to promote HCC bone metastasis by inhibiting OPG expression [ 39 ]. These results implied that OPG may be an anti-metastatic factor in HCC. Interestingly, MHCC97-L cells expressed higher levels of OPG protein under hypoxic conditions, despite lower levels of OPG mRNA [ 80 ]. This inconsistency between the protein and mRNA expression levels may be attributed to the special properties of OPG as a secreted protein.

Clinical relevance of OPG in other cancers

The mRNA and protein expression of OPG was found to be upregulated in pancreatic cancer compared to normal pancreatic tissues, and both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the elevated levels of OPG were adversely correlated with the overall survival of cancer patients [ 81 ]. Aversa et al. showed that OPG was one of 12 biomarkers that were positively correlated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk [ 82 ]. For oral squamous cell carcinoma, the elevated OPG expression was shown to be associated with bone invasion and shorter long-term cancer-specific survival [ 83 ] (Table 1 ). Table 1 A glance of clinical significance of OPG in cancers. Cancer type Analysis Diagnostic value Prognostic value ESCC [ 82 ] PEA Increased ESCC risk with higher OPG level Not available HCC [ 78 ] ELISA Not available Higher serum OPG associated with worse overall-survival m-ccRCC [ 95 ] RT-PCR Not available Increased RANK/OPG ratio associated with BM and worse prognosis OSCC [ 83 ] IHC Not available Elevated OPG expression associated with bone invasion, poor pathological tumor regression to neoadjuvant CRT, and worse long-term cancer-specific survival BC and GC [ 64 ] ELISA Reduced of breast cancer risk and increase GC risk with higher serum OPG Upper tertile of OPG with higher risk of cancer-related mortality particularly for GC BC [ 59 ] ELISA Bone metastasis with reduce OPG level Not available BC [ 62 ] ELISA Increased risk of ER - BC with higher serum OPG Not available BC [ 63 ] ELISA Not available Higher OPG associated with increased mortality after a BC diagnosis, particularly in ER + patients PCa [ 55 ] ELISA Bone metastases with higher OPG level Higher serum OPG associated with worse prognosis PCa [ 56 ] RT-PCR Elevated OPG mRNA expression in metastatic tumor compared to BPH Not available MM [ 72 ] ELISA Higher OPG and RANKL/OPG ratios in MM patients Not available PaC [ 81 ] IHC Upregulated OPG in PaC tissues Upregulated OPG with poor overall survival BC breast cancer, BPH benign prostatic hyperplasia, ELISA enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, ER estrogen receptor, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, GC gastrointestinal cancer, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, IHC immunohistochemistry, m-ccRCC metastatic clear-cell renal carcinoma, MM multiple myeloma, OSCC oral squamous cell carcinoma, PCa prostate cancer, PaC pancreatic cancer, PEA proximity extension assay, RT-PCR real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Table 1
A glance of clinical significance of OPG in cancers.
BC breast cancer, BPH benign prostatic hyperplasia, ELISA enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, ER estrogen receptor, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, GC gastrointestinal cancer, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, IHC immunohistochemistry, m-ccRCC metastatic clear-cell renal carcinoma, MM multiple myeloma, OSCC oral squamous cell carcinoma, PCa prostate cancer, PaC pancreatic cancer, PEA proximity extension assay, RT-PCR real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Cancer typeAnalysisDiagnostic valuePrognostic value
ESCC [ 82 ]PEAIncreased ESCC risk with higher OPG levelNot available
HCC [ 78 ]ELISANot availableHigher serum OPG associated with worse overall-survival
m-ccRCC [ 95 ]RT-PCRNot availableIncreased RANK/OPG ratio associated with BM and worse prognosis
OSCC [ 83 ]IHCNot availableElevated OPG expression associated with bone invasion, poor pathological tumor regression to neoadjuvant CRT, and worse long-term cancer-specific survival
BC and GC [ 64 ]ELISAReduced of breast cancer risk and increase GC risk with higher serum OPGUpper tertile of OPG with higher risk of cancer-related mortality particularly for GC
BC [ 59 ]ELISABone metastasis with reduce OPG levelNot available
BC [ 62 ]ELISAIncreased risk of ER - BC with higher serum OPGNot available
BC [ 63 ]ELISANot availableHigher OPG associated with increased mortality after a BC diagnosis, particularly in ER + patients
PCa [ 55 ]ELISABone metastases with higher OPG levelHigher serum OPG associated with worse prognosis
PCa [ 56 ]RT-PCRElevated OPG mRNA expression in metastatic tumor compared to BPHNot available
MM [ 72 ]ELISAHigher OPG and RANKL/OPG ratios in MM patientsNot available
PaC [ 81 ]IHCUpregulated OPG in PaC tissuesUpregulated OPG with poor overall survival

Translational endeavors of OPG for cancer treatment

As early as 2001, the therapeutic potential of OPG was reported. Vanderkerken et al. found that the tumor burden of the recombinant OPG treatment group was reduced and the tumor onset time was delayed in MM murine model [ 8 ]. A recombinant OPG construct was also reported to inhibit bone resorption at the molecular level, which manifested as a decrease in the bone resorption marker urinary N-telopeptide of collagen (NTX) in patients with MM [ 9 ]. A mouse model of osteosarcoma expressing truncated OPG showed lower tumor incidence and longer survival [ 84 ]. However, OPG failed to inhibit pulmonary metastasis [ 84 ], illustrating the relationship of OPG with the bone microenvironment on OPG. What’s more, OPG-Fc treatment of mice with established bone metastases positively impacted prognosis [ 85 ]. After the administration of OPG-Fc to 12-week-old BALB/c mice, ovariectomy-induced osteoclast lesions and growth of disseminated tumor cells were prevented. This finding might suggest that bone metastases can be prevented by early administration of anti-resorptive therapy, including OPG, in a low-estrogen environment [ 86 ]. The capability of rAAV-OPG therapy to inhibit tumor growth and protect bone integrity was elucidated in a mouse model of bone metastasis [ 87 ]. In addition, OPG-Fc inhibited the occurrence and progression of bone metastases in mice bearing skeletal non-small cell lung cancer tumors [ 10 ]. Treatment with rOPG-Fc prevented bone damage by patient-derived B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) xenografts, even under conditions of a heavy tumor load [ 88 ].

In addition to binding to RANKL to inhibit bone resorption, OPG also combines with TRAIL to exert an anti-apoptotic effect, thus limiting the clinical applications of OPG in cancer patients. Special genetically engineered MSCs overexpressing OPG that selectively bind to RANKL, but not to TRAIL were designed by Qiang et al. As expected, the osteoclast activity induced by tumor cells expressing mutant OPG was significantly suppressed, suggesting the potential therapeutic value of this technology [ 89 ]. This provided clues for us to develop OPG-related therapeutics with fewer side effects and greater efficacy.

Due to the antagonistic relationship between OPG and RANKL, inhibiting RANKL may somewhat mimic the effect of OPG. The clinical development of OPG-Fc could be replaced by a human monoclonal antibody called denosumab (AMG 162), which specifically inhibits RANKL [ 90 ]. Based on data from considerable preclinical studies, many clinical trials have been conducted for denosumab and certain phase III clinical trials achieved exhilarant outcomes in patients with early stage breast cancer or newly diagnosed MM [ 90 – 94 ].

Conclusions

The roles and molecular mechanisms of OPG in bone biology and pathology have been intensively investigated in the past decades. Beyond its involvement in bone diseases, comprehensive understanding of OPG in other benign diseases and in cancer progression has been achieved. OPG is a multifaceted player that can regulate vascular biology, fibrosis, immunity, EMT, and the apoptosis of cancer cells (Fig. 3 ). As a secreted protein, OPG exerts bioactive functions by modulating various signal transduction pathways in cells, as well as remodeling the local microenvironment. At the same time, the presence of secreted OPG in human blood and the unique expression pattern provide a potential non-invasive approach to the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer patients. The function of OPG is contextual, given it influences numerous signaling, which exerts contradictory functions for cancer progression. Thus, it is essential to modify the endogenous OPG. Engineered OPG should display selective targeting effects to avoid synchronous side effects. Fig. 3 Summary of the role of OPG in benign and malignant diseases. OPG is involved in various physiological and pathological steps for disease progression, including bone remodeling, vascular calcification, angiogenesis, immunoregulation, fibrosis, cell survival and apoptosis, EMT, and cancer metastasis.

Fig. 3 Summary of the role of OPG in benign and malignant diseases. OPG is involved in various physiological and pathological steps for disease progression, including bone remodel…
Fig. 3 Summary of the role of OPG in benign and malignant diseases. OPG is involved in various physiological and pathological steps for disease progression, including bone remodeling, vascular calcification, angiogenesis, immunoregulation, fibrosis, cell survival and apoptosis, EMT, and cancer metastasis.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yufei Wang, Yiyang Liu.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81372327, 81572427 and 81874189).

Author contributions

ZH and YW designed this study. YW and YL drafted the manuscript. ZH, BX and XC revised the manuscript. BX obtained funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

1. Simonet WS Lacey DL Dunstan CR Kelley M Chang MS Luthy R Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density Cell 1997 89 309 19. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80209-3 9108485

2. Walsh MC Choi Y Biology of the RANKL-RANK-OPG System in Immunity, Bone, and Beyond Front Immunol 2014 5 511 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00511 25368616 PMC4202272

3. Holen I Shipman CM Role of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in cancer Clin Sci (Lond) 2006 110 279 91 10.1042/CS20050175 16464170

4. Chen CY Rao SS Tan YJ Luo MJ Hu XK Yin H Extracellular vesicles from human urine-derived stem cells prevent osteoporosis by transferring CTHRC1 and OPG Bone Res 2019 7 18 10.1038/s41413-019-0056-9 31263627 PMC6594995

5. Takayanagi H Oda H Yamamoto S Kawaguchi H Tanaka S Nishikawa T A new mechanism of bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: synovial fibroblasts induce osteoclastogenesis Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997 240 279 86 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7404 9388467

6. Renn TY, Huang YK, Feng SW, Wang HW, Lee WF, Lin CT, et al. Prophylactic supplement with melatonin successfully suppresses the pathogenesis of periodontitis through normalizing RANKL/OPG ratio and depressing the TLR4/MyD88 signaling pathway. J Pineal Res. 2018;64. 10.1111/jpi.12464. 10.1111/jpi.12464 29274168

7. Emery JG McDonnell P Burke MB Deen KC Lyn S Silverman C Osteoprotegerin is a receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL J Biol Chem 1998 273 14363 7 10.1074/jbc.273.23.14363 9603945

8. Vanderkerken K De Leenheer E Shipman C Asosingh K Willems A Van Camp B Recombinant osteoprotegerin decreases tumor burden and increases survival in a murine model of multiple myeloma Cancer Res 2003 63 287 9 12543775

9. Body JJ Greipp P Coleman RE Facon T Geurs F Fermand JP A phase I study of AMGN-0007, a recombinant osteoprotegerin construct, in patients with multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma related bone metastases Cancer 2003 97 887 92 10.1002/cncr.11138 12548591

10. Miller RE Jones JC Tometsko M Blake ML Dougall WC RANKL inhibition blocks osteolytic lesions and reduces skeletal tumor burden in models of non-small-cell lung cancer bone metastases J Thorac Oncol 2014 9 345 54 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000070 24496001

11. Tsuda E Goto M Mochizuki S Yano K Kobayashi F Morinaga T Isolation of a novel cytokine from human fibroblasts that specifically inhibits osteoclastogenesis Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997 234 137 42. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6603 9168977

12. American Society for B, Mineral Research President’s Committee on N. Proposed standard nomenclature for new tumor necrosis factor family members involved in the regulation of bone resorption. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research President’s Committee on Nomenclature J Bone Min Res 2000 15 2293 6 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.12.2293 11127193

13. Dawson S Lawrie A From bones to blood pressure, developing novel biologic approaches targeting the osteoprotegein pathway for pulmonary vascular disease Pharm Ther 2017 169 78 82 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.06.017 PMC5243145 27373854

14. Weilbaecher KN Guise TA McCauley LK Cancer to bone: a fatal attraction Nat Rev Cancer 2011 11 411 25. 10.1038/nrc3055 21593787 PMC3666847

15. Bucay N Sarosi I Dunstan CR Morony S Tarpley J Capparelli C osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification Genes Dev 1998 12 1260 8 10.1101/gad.12.9.1260 9573043 PMC316769

16. Boyce BF Xing L Biology of RANK, RANKL, and osteoprotegerin Arthritis Res Ther. 2007 9 Suppl 1 S1 10.1186/ar2165 17634140 PMC1924516

17. Scholtysek C Katzenbeisser J Fu H Uderhardt S Ipseiz N Stoll C PPARbeta/delta governs Wnt signaling and bone turnover Nat Med 2013 19 608 13 10.1038/nm.3146 23542786

18. van Tuyl LH Voskuyl AE Boers M Geusens P Landewe RB Dijkmans BA Baseline RANKL:OPG ratio and markers of bone and cartilage degradation predict annual radiological progression over 11 years in rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis 2010 69 1623 8 10.1136/ard.2009.121764 20525836

19. Kearns AE Khosla S Kostenuik PJ Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulation of bone remodeling in health and disease Endocr Rev 2008 29 155 92. 10.1210/er.2007-0014 18057140 PMC2528846

20. Di Bartolo BA Schoppet M Mattar MZ Rachner TD Shanahan CM Kavurma MM Calcium and osteoprotegerin regulate IGF1R expression to inhibit vascular calcification Cardiovasc Res 2011 91 537 45 10.1093/cvr/cvr084 21447702

21. Gordin D Soro-Paavonen A Thomas MC Harjutsalo V Saraheimo M Bjerre M Osteoprotegerin is an independent predictor of vascular events in Finnish adults with type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 2013 36 1827 33 10.2337/dc12-2170 23801795 PMC3687299

22. Rochette L Meloux A Rigal E Zeller M Cottin Y Vergely C The role of osteoprotegerin in the crosstalk between vessels and bone: its potential utility as a marker of cardiometabolic diseases Pharm Ther 2018 182 115 32. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.08.015 28867452

23. Ueland T Jemtland R Godang K Kjekshus J Hognestad A Omland T Prognostic value of osteoprotegerin in heart failure after acute myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 44 1970 6 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.076 15542278

24. Kimura S Nakamura Y Kobayashi N Shiroguchi K Kawakami E Mutoh M Osteoprotegerin-dependent M cell self-regulation balances gut infection and immunity Nat Commun 2020 11 234 10.1038/s41467-019-13883-y 31932605 PMC6957684

25. Yun TJ Tallquist MD Aicher A Rafferty KL Marshall AJ Moon JJ Osteoprotegerin, a crucial regulator of bone metabolism, also regulates B cell development and function J Immunol 2001 166 1482 91 10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.1482 11160187

26. Baud’huin M Duplomb L Teletchea S Lamoureux F Ruiz-Velasco C Maillasson M Osteoprotegerin: multiple partners for multiple functions Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2013 24 401 9 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.06.001 23827649

27. Akiyama N Shinzawa M Miyauchi M Yanai H Tateishi R Shimo Y Limitation of immune tolerance-inducing thymic epithelial cell development by Spi-B-mediated negative feedback regulation J Exp Med 2014 211 2425 38 10.1084/jem.20141207 25385757 PMC4235644

28. Habibie H Adhyatmika A Schaafsma D Melgert BN The role of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in fibrosis: its potential as a biomarker and/or biological target for the treatment of fibrotic diseases Pharm Ther 2021 228 107941 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107941 34171336

29. Meng H Bai X Yu H Wang Z Guo A Osteoprotegerin promotes cell growth by regulating matrix metalloprotease-13 in chondrocytes J Biomater Tissue Eng 2017 7 257 60. 10.1166/jbt.2017.1558

30. Adhyatmika A Putri KSS Gore E Mangnus KA Reker-Smit C Schuppan D, Osteoprotegerin Expression in Liver is Induced by IL13 through TGFβ Cell Physiol Biochem 2022 56 28 38 10.33594/000000492 35060690

31. Bosselut N Taibi L Guechot J Zarski JP Sturm N Gelineau MC Including osteoprotegerin and collagen IV in a score-based blood test for liver fibrosis increases diagnostic accuracy Clin Chim Acta 2013 415 63 8 10.1016/j.cca.2012.09.020 23022619

32. Adhyatmika A Beljaars L Putri KSS Habibie H Boorsma CE Reker-Smit C, Osteoprotegerin is more than a possible serum marker in liver fibrosis: a study into its function in human and murine liver Pharmaceutics 2020 12 471. 10.3390/pharmaceutics12050471 PMC7284440 32455750

33. Raje NS Bhatta S Terpos E Role of the RANK/RANKL pathway in multiple myeloma Clin Cancer Res 2019 25 12 20 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1537 30093448

34. Sundaram K Sambandam Y Balasubramanian S Pillai B Voelkel-Johnson C Ries WL STAT-6 mediates TRAIL induced RANK ligand expression in stromal/preosteoblast cells Bone. 2015 71 137 44. 10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.016 25445452

35. Glass DA 2nd Bialek P Ahn JD Starbuck M Patel MS Clevers H Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation Dev Cell 2005 8 751 64. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017 15866165

36. Duan P Bonewald LF The role of the wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in formation and maintenance of bone and teeth Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2016 77 23 9 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.05.015 27210503 PMC4958569

37. Quan J Elhousiny M Johnson NW Gao J Transforming growth factor-beta1 treatment of oral cancer induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promotes bone invasion via enhanced activity of osteoclasts Clin Exp Metastasis 2013 30 659 70. 10.1007/s10585-013-9570-0 23378237 PMC3663202

38. Jiao K Niu LN Li QH Chen FM Zhao W Li JJ Biphasic silica/apatite co-mineralized collagen scaffolds stimulate osteogenesis and inhibit RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis Acta Biomater 2015 19 23 32 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.012 25792280 PMC4805577

39. Huang Z Chu L Liang J Tan X Wang Y Wen J H19 Promotes HCC bone metastasis through reducing osteoprotegerin expression in a protein phosphatase 1 catalytic subunit alpha/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent manner and sponging microRNA 200b-3p Hepatology 2021 74 214 32. 10.1002/hep.31673 33615520

40. Hao Y Gao R Lu B Ran Y Yang Z Liu J Ghrelin protects against depleted uranium-induced bone damage by increasing osteoprotegerin/RANKL ratio Toxicol Appl Pharm 2018 343 62 70 10.1016/j.taap.2018.02.015 29477364

41. Nagy V Penninger JM The RANKL-RANK story Gerontology. 2015 61 534 42 10.1159/000371845 25720990

42. Bai S Kopan R Zou W Hilton MJ Ong CT Long F NOTCH1 regulates osteoclastogenesis directly in osteoclast precursors and indirectly via osteoblast lineage cells J Biol Chem 2008 283 6509 18. 10.1074/jbc.M707000200 18156632

43. Qiang YW Chen Y Stephens O Brown N Chen B Epstein J Myeloma-derived Dickkopf-1 disrupts Wnt-regulated osteoprotegerin and RANKL production by osteoblasts: a potential mechanism underlying osteolytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma Blood. 2008 112 196 207 10.1182/blood-2008-01-132134 18305214 PMC2435688

44. O’Regan N Moxon C Gegenbauer K O’Sullivan JM Chion A Smith OP Marked elevation in plasma osteoprotegerin constitutes an early and consistent feature of cerebral malaria Thromb Haemost 2016 115 773 80. 10.1160/TH15-10-0796 26766771 PMC4990170

45. Standal T Seidel C Hjertner O Plesner T Sanderson RD Waage A Osteoprotegerin is bound, internalized, and degraded by multiple myeloma cells Blood. 2002 100 3002 7 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1190 12351414

46. Lane D Matte I Rancourt C Piche A Osteoprotegerin (OPG) protects ovarian cancer cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis but does not contribute to malignant ascites-mediated attenuation of TRAIL-induced apoptosis J Ovarian Res 2012 5 34 10.1186/1757-2215-5-34 23153223 PMC3507713

47. Alsterda A Asha K Powrozek O Repak M Goswami S Dunn AM Salubrinal exposes anticancer properties in inflammatory breast cancer cells by manipulating the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway Front Oncol 2021 11 654940 10.3389/fonc.2021.654940 34094947 PMC8173155

48. Wan X Song Y Fang H Xu L Che X Wang S RANKL/RANK promotes the migration of gastric cancer cells by interacting with EGFR Clin Transl Med 2020 9 3 10.1186/s40169-019-0249-2 31933009 PMC6957613

49. Alraouji NN Hendrayani SF Ghebeh H Al-Mohanna FH Aboussekhra A Osteoprotegerin OPG mediates the anti-carcinogenic effects of normal breast fibroblasts and targets cancer stem cells through inhibition of the beta-catenin pathway Cancer Lett 2021 520 374 84 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.08.013 34416336

50. Cross SS Yang Z Brown NJ Balasubramanian SP Evans CA Woodward JK Osteoprotegerin (OPG)-a potential new role in the regulation of endothelial cell phenotype and tumour angiogenesis? Int J Cancer 2006 118 1901 8 10.1002/ijc.21606 16287088

51. Pritzker LB Scatena M Giachelli CM The role of osteoprotegerin and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in human microvascular endothelial cell survival Mol Biol Cell 2004 15 2834 41. 10.1091/mbc.e04-01-0059 15064358 PMC420106

52. Benslimane-Ahmim Z Heymann D Dizier B Lokajczyk A Brion R Laurendeau I Osteoprotegerin, a new actor in vasculogenesis, stimulates endothelial colony-forming cells properties J Thromb Haemost 2011 9 834 43. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04207.x 21255246

53. Benslimane-Ahmim Z Pereira J Lokajczyk A Dizier B Galy-Fauroux I Fischer A-M Osteoprotegerin regulates cancer cell migration through SDF-1/CXCR4 axis and promotes tumour development by increasing neovascularization Cancer Lett 2017 395 11 9 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.02.032 28263839

54. Wang H, Zhang W, Bado I, Zhang XH. Bone tropism in cancer metastases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10. 10.1101/cshperspect.a036848. 10.1101/cshperspect.a036848 PMC7528862 31615871

55. Jung K Lein M Stephan C Von Hosslin K Semjonow A Sinha P Comparison of 10 serum bone turnover markers in prostate carcinoma patients with bone metastatic spread: diagnostic and prognostic implications Int J Cancer 2004 111 783 91. 10.1002/ijc.20314 15252851

56. Christoph F Konig F Lebentrau S Jandrig B Krause H Strenziok R RANKL/RANK/OPG cytokine receptor system: mRNA expression pattern in BPH, primary and metastatic prostate cancer disease World J Urol 2018 36 187 92. 10.1007/s00345-017-2145-y 29204705

57. Cody JJ Rivera AA Lyons GR Yang SW Wang M Ashley JW Expression of osteoprotegerin from a replicating adenovirus inhibits the progression of prostate cancer bone metastases in a murine model Lab Invest 2013 93 268 78. 10.1038/labinvest.2012.179 23358109 PMC3584184

58. Corey E Brown LG Kiefer JA Quinn JE Pitts TE Blair JM Osteoprotegerin in prostate cancer bone metastasis Cancer Res 2005 65 1710 8 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2033 15753366

59. Elfar GA Ebrahim MA Elsherbiny NM Eissa LA Validity of osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand for the detection of bone metastasis in breast cancer Oncol Res 2017 25 641 50. 10.3727/096504016X14768398678750 27983911 PMC7841017

60. Rachner TD Singh SK Schoppet M Benad P Bornhauser M Ellenrieder V Zoledronic acid induces apoptosis and changes the TRAIL/OPG ratio in breast cancer cells Cancer Lett 2010 287 109 16 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.06.003 19577359

61. Mercatali L Ricci M Scarpi E Serra P Fabbri F Ricci R RANK/RANK-L/OPG in patients with bone metastases treated with anticancer agents and zoledronic acid: a prospective study Int J Mol Sci 2013 14 10683 93. 10.3390/ijms140610683 23702841 PMC3709696

62. Fortner RT Sarink D Schock H Johnson T Tjonneland A Olsen A Osteoprotegerin and breast cancer risk by hormone receptor subtype: a nested case-control study in the EPIC cohort BMC Med 2017 15 26 10.1186/s12916-017-0786-8 28173834 PMC5297136

63. Sarink D Schock H Johnson T Chang-Claude J Overvad K Olsen A Receptor activator of nuclear factor kB ligand, osteoprotegerin, and risk of death following a breast cancer diagnosis: results from the EPIC cohort BMC Cancer 2018 18 1010 10.1186/s12885-018-4887-3 30348163 PMC6196438

64. Vik A Brodin EE Mathiesen EB Brox J Jorgensen L Njolstad I Serum osteoprotegerin and future risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality in the general population: the Tromso study Eur J Epidemiol 2015 30 219 30. 10.1007/s10654-014-9975-3 25446307

65. Mountzios G Dimopoulos MA Bamias A Papadopoulos G Kastritis E Syrigos K Abnormal bone remodeling process is due to an imbalance in the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) axis in patients with solid tumors metastatic to the skeleton Acta Oncol 2007 46 221 9 10.1080/02841860600635870 17453373

66. Widschwendter M Burnell M Fraser L Rosenthal AN Philpott S Reisel D Osteoprotegerin (OPG), the endogenous inhibitor of receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL), is dysregulated in BRCA mutation carriers EBioMedicine 2015 2 1331 9 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.08.037 26629528 PMC4634624

67. Lintermans A Van Asten K Jongen L Van Brussel T Laenen A Verhaeghe J Genetic variant in the osteoprotegerin gene is associated with aromatase inhibitor-related musculoskeletal toxicity in breast cancer patients Eur J Cancer 2016 56 31 6 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.013 26798969

68. Holen I Croucher PI Hamdy FC Eaton CL Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a survival factor for human prostate cancer cells Cancer Res 2002 62 1619 23 11912131

69. Marino S Bishop RT Carrasco G Logan JG Li B Idris AI Pharmacological inhibition of NFkappaB reduces prostate cancer related osteoclastogenesis in vitro and osteolysis ex vivo Calcif Tissue Int 2019 105 193 204 10.1007/s00223-019-00538-9 30929064

70. Velletri T Huang Y Wang Y Li Q Hu M Xie N Loss of p53 in mesenchymal stem cells promotes alteration of bone remodeling through negative regulation of osteoprotegerin Cell Death Differ 2021 28 156 69. 10.1038/s41418-020-0590-4 32694652 PMC7853126

71. Breitkreutz I Raab MS Vallet S Hideshima T Raje N Mitsiades C Lenalidomide inhibits osteoclastogenesis, survival factors and bone-remodeling markers in multiple myeloma Leukemia. 2008 22 1925 32. 10.1038/leu.2008.174 18596740

72. Goranova-Marinova V Goranov S Pavlov P Tzvetkova T Serum levels of OPG, RANKL and RANKL/OPG ratio in newly-diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Clinical correlations Haematologica. 2007 92 1000 1 10.3324/haematol.10943 17606458

73. Rabin N Kyriakou C Coulton L Gallagher OM Buckle C Benjamin R A new xenograft model of myeloma bone disease demonstrating the efficacy of human mesenchymal stem cells expressing osteoprotegerin by lentiviral gene transfer Leukemia. 2007 21 2181 91 10.1038/sj.leu.2404814 17657224

74. Eom KS Kim SJ Lee JJ Suh C Kim JS Yoon SS Changes in osteoblastic activity in patient who received bortezomib as second line treatment for plasma cell myeloma: a prospective multicenter study Biomed Res Int 2014 2014 245247 10.1155/2014/245247 25050331 PMC4094867

75. Inanc M Kaynar L Enhos S Pala C Karaca H Berk V Nuclear factor-kappa B ligand and osteoprotegerin levels in serum and gingival crevicular fluid in patients with bone metastases treated with zoledronic acid Med Oncol 2014 31 837 10.1007/s12032-013-0837-8 24448976

76. Johnson DC Weinhold N Mitchell J Chen B Stephens OW Forsti A Genetic factors influencing the risk of multiple myeloma bone disease Leukemia 2016 30 883 8 10.1038/leu.2015.342 26669972 PMC4832071

77. Jiang R Xia Y Li J Deng L Zhao L Shi J High expression levels of IKKalpha and IKKbeta are necessary for the malignant properties of liver cancer Int J Cancer 2010 126 1263 74 10.1002/ijc.24854 19728335

78. Zhang C Lin J Ni X Li H Zheng L Zhao Z Prognostic value of serum osteoprotegerin level in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following surgical resection Front Oncol 2021 11 731989 10.3389/fonc.2021.731989 34650917 PMC8505987

79. Cheng K Shi J Liu Z Jia Y Qin Q Zhang H A panel of five plasma proteins for the early diagnosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma in individuals at risk EBioMedicine. 2020 52 102638 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102638 32014820 PMC6997493

80. Gao YB Xiang ZL Zhou LY Wu ZF Fan J Zeng HY Enhanced production of CTGF and IL-11 from highly metastatic hepatoma cells under hypoxic conditions: an implication of hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis to bone J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2013 139 669 79 10.1007/s00432-012-1370-4 23307318 PMC11824752

81. Shi W Qiu W Wang W Zhou X Zhong X Tian G Osteoprotegerin is up-regulated in pancreatic cancers and correlates with cancer-associated new-onset diabetes Biosci Trends 2014 8 322 6 10.5582/bst.2014.01092 25641178

82. Aversa J Song M Shimazu T Inoue M Charvat H Yamaji T Prediagnostic circulating inflammation biomarkers and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-cohort study in Japan Int J Cancer 2020 147 686 91. 10.1002/ijc.32763 31671219

83. Russmueller G Moser D Wurger T Wrba F Christopoulos P Kostakis G Upregulation of osteoprotegerin expression correlates with bone invasion and predicts poor clinical outcome in oral cancer Oral Oncol 2015 51 247 53. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.010 25532817

84. Lamoureux F Richard P Wittrant Y Battaglia S Pilet P Trichet V Therapeutic relevance of osteoprotegerin gene therapy in osteosarcoma: blockade of the vicious cycle between tumor cell proliferation and bone resorption Cancer Res 2007 67 7308 18 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4130 17671200

85. Canon JR Roudier M Bryant R Morony S Stolina M Kostenuik PJ Inhibition of RANKL blocks skeletal tumor progression and improves survival in a mouse model of breast cancer bone metastasis Clin Exp Metastasis 2008 25 119 29. 10.1007/s10585-007-9127-1 18064531

86. Ottewell PD Wang N Brown HK Fowles CA Croucher PI Eaton CL OPG-Fc inhibits ovariectomy-induced growth of disseminated breast cancer cells in bone Int J Cancer 2015 137 968 77 10.1002/ijc.29439 25603921

87. Chanda D Isayeva T Kumar S Siegal GP Szafran AA Zinn KR Systemic osteoprotegerin gene therapy restores tumor-induced bone loss in a therapeutic model of breast cancer bone metastasis Mol Ther 2008 16 871 8 10.1038/mt.2008.48 18388919

88. Rajakumar SA Papp E Lee KK Grandal I Merico D Liu CC B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells mediate RANK-RANKL-dependent bone destruction Sci Transl Med 2020 12 eaba5942. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba5942 32938796

89. Higgs JT Lee JH Wang H Ramani VC Chanda D Hardy CY Mesenchymal stem cells expressing osteoprotegerin variants inhibit osteolysis in a murine model of multiple myeloma Blood Adv 2017 1 2375 85. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017007310 29296887 PMC5729616

90. Kostenuik PJ Nguyen HQ McCabe J Warmington KS Kurahara C Sun N Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, Inhibits bone resorption and increases BMD in knock-in mice that express chimeric (Murine/Human) RANKL J Bone Miner Res 2009 24 182 95 10.1359/jbmr.081112 19016581

91. Santini D Galluzzo S Zoccoli A Pantano F Fratto ME Vincenzi B New molecular targets in bone metastases Cancer Treat Rev 2010 36 Suppl 3 S6 S10 10.1016/S0305-7372(10)70013-X 21129612

92. Gnant M Pfeiler G Steger GG Egle D Greil R Fitzal F Adjuvant denosumab in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (ABCSG-18): disease-free survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 2019 20 339 51. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30862-3 30795951

93. Coleman R Finkelstein DM Barrios C Martin M Iwata H Hegg R Adjuvant denosumab in early breast cancer (D-CARE): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 2020 21 60 72 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30687-4 31806543

94. Raje N Terpos E Willenbacher W Shimizu K García-Sanz R Durie B Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study Lancet Oncol 2018 19 370 81 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30072-X 29429912

95. Beuselinck B Jean-Baptiste J Couchy G Job S De Reynies A Wolter P RANK/OPG ratio of expression in primary clear-cell renal cell carcinoma is associated with bone metastasis and prognosis in patients treated with anti-VEGFR-TKIs Br J Cancer. 2015 113 1313 22 10.1038/bjc.2015.352 26528707 PMC4815796

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты