1. Introduction
There exist several well-known examples of successful drug repurposing. Sildenafil, initially developed for coronary artery disease, was repurposed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction [ 1 ]. Thalidomide, originally an antiemetic withdrawn due to its teratogenicity, was subsequently redirected for multiple myeloma and leprosy [ 2 ]. Propranolol, commonly used in cardiology, has found its role in anxiety management [ 3 ]. Methotrexate, an anticancer agent, has been repurposed to treat autoimmune diseases [ 4 ].
Utilising existing drugs in different indications is a promising strategy, as it may provide new therapeutic alternatives for patients who have already used all well-established therapies with unsatisfactory outcomes. It also accelerates the process of drug discovery for particular diseases by relying on molecules with proven activity [ 5 ]. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), also known as flozins ( Figure 1 ), are antidiabetic drugs that have been extensively investigated in recent years for potential repurposing, with major success. As they expanded from diabetology to cardiology and nephrology, SGLT2i are a prime example of this phenomenon, with dapagliflozin and empagliflozin being incorporated into current guidelines for the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The expansion of SGLT2i indications was facilitated by the pleiotropic nature of their functions, which is well-described in the literature [ 6 , 7 ].
The main mechanism of action of flozins is the inhibition of the SGLT protein family, predominantly in the proximal tubules of nephrons. This blockade prevents the transport of glucose from the tubular lumen into the interstitial compartment. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), this effect, mainly mediated through SGLT2 inhibition, results in reduced renal glucose reabsorption and increased urinary glucose loss. Modulation of carbohydrate transport not only benefits diabetic patients by restoring their glucose homeostasis but could also be potentially exploited to target altered metabolism in cancer cells. Research on differences in bioenergetics between normal and neoplastic cells has a long history, with the most important discovery known as the Warburg effect. Neoplastic transformation is linked to a specific switch in catabolic cellular pathways and a shift towards glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen (aerobic glycolysis). This differs from normal cells, which, under the same conditions, rely on oxidative phosphorylation, resulting in increased glucose uptake in cancer cells compared to healthy tissues [ 8 ]. In a clinical setting, we routinely rely on this phenomenon for tumour diagnosis using PET-CT [ 9 ]. This distinct feature of neoplasms also presents a potential target for attempting to limit their ability to meet metabolic demands [ 10 ].
To avoid limitations in glucose supply, cancer cells are known to upregulate the family of facilitated diffusion glucose transporters (GLUTs). However, there is evidence that in many types of neoplasms, SGLTs are also expressed, with SGLT2, the main receptor for SGLTi, being present in pancreatic, prostatic, and lung cancer [ 7 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Inhibition of SGLT2 may hence constitute a promising, under-researched path in oncology, within which an increased number of multimorbid patients suffer from diabetes and obesity. Those two factors, which are serious problems of today’s world [ 14 , 15 ], have been linked to cancer promotion by several studies [ 16 , 17 ]. Both represent a dysregulation in glucose homeostasis, which is reported to predispose to various malignancies [ 18 ]. Therefore, drugs that can link a direct ability to suppress tumour energy supply with restoring metabolic homeostasis, and improving the functions of internal organs may constitute a beneficial trajectory in the field of oncology.
This review aims to highlight the clinical implications of various structurally distinct SGLT2 inhibitors, considering their cardioprotective, nephroprotective, and metabolic effects, as well as their potential relevance in oncology, providing a coherent perspective on their possible applications in cancer patients.
2. Importance of (Hetero)Arene Scaffolds in Synthetic Flozins
Aromatic rings are ubiquitous in bioactive molecules, with approximately 85% of small-molecule drugs containing a heterocyclic moiety [ 19 ]. Synthetic compounds bearing aryl and heteroaryl substituents include SGLT2 inhibitors, known as flozins. These drugs have a C-(hetero)arene-β-D-glucoside structure, in which the aromatic aglycone—usually a linked aryl or heteroaryl ring system, or a fused heterocycle—acts as a hydrophobic “anchor” within the glucose transporter’s binding pocket. The aglycones of flozins significantly influence their pharmacokinetics by affecting both affinity and selectivity for the SGLT2/SGLT1 transporter pair [ 20 ]. The origin of flozins comes from the natural compound phlorizin, an O-glucoside isolated from apple root bark and other plants ( Figure 1 ). As has long been observed, the phlorizin induces glucosuria by blocking glucose reabsorption in the kidneys. Research on synthetic flozins began in the 1990s and led to the approval of dapagliflozin, the first drug in this class, for type-2 diabetes in 2012 (EMA 2012, FDA 2014). Subsequently, other flozins were introduced for T2DM, such as canagliflozin (FDA 2013, EMA 2013), empagliflozin (FDA 2014, EMA 2014), ertugliflozin (FDA 2017, EMA 2018) and others [ 21 ]. According to clinical trial data, including findings from DAPA-HF, DAPA-CKD, DELIVER [ 22 ], and EMPA-KIDNEY [ 23 ], the indications for SGLT2 inhibitors have been expanded to encompass HF and CKD [ 24 ]. The first expansions concerned patients with HFrEF (HF with reduced ejection fraction). Dapagliflozin, based on the DAPA-HF trial, received approvals (FDA 2020, EMA 2020, PMDA 2020), while empagliflozin, based on the EMPEROR-Reduced trial, followed shortly (FDA 2021, EMA 2021, PMDA 2021) [ 25 ]. Subsequently, the indications were extended to all patients with HF, regardless of ejection fraction. Empagliflozin was the first to secure this broad indication after the EMPEROR-Preserved trial (FDA 2022, EMA 2022, PMDA 2022), followed by dapagliflozin based on the DELIVER trial (FDA 2023, EMA 2023, PMDA 2023) [ 26 ]. The indications were further expanded to include the treatment of CKD. Dapagliflozin was the first approved for this indication based on DAPA-CKD results (FDA 2021, EMA 2021, PMDA 2021). Empagliflozin was subsequently approved based on the EMPA-KIDNEY trial (FDA 2023, EMA 2023, PMDA 2024) [ 27 ].
Multiple computational and structural studies have shown that different flozins interact differently with the SGLT2 binding pocket, and these interactions affect binding strength and inhibitory potency ( Table 1 ). For instance, empagliflozin interacts with Ser 78, Gly 79, Lys 154, Asp 158, and Ser 393, forming stabilising hydrogen bonds and polar contacts, while its aglycone is anchored via aromatic interactions with Tyr 290 and Phe 98, as well as hydrophobic contacts with Leu 283, Val 95, and His 80 [ 28 ]. In contrast, canagliflozin engages a different set of residues—Asn 75, Ser 287, Lys 321, and Gln 457—which alters its binding geometry and slightly shifts potency and SGLT2/SGLT1 selectivity [ 28 ]. Broader analyses across many C-glycoside ligands highlight the importance of amino acid residues such as Glu 99, Leu 283, Lys 321, Asn 75, Ser 287, and Gln 457 for high-affinity binding, showing that disruption of these interactions can significantly reduce inhibitor potency [ 29 ] ( Figure 2 ).
Molecular-dynamics simulations further support these findings, indicating that the stability of hydrophobic and polar contacts is critical for effective inhibition [ 30 ]. All SGLT inhibitors’ interactions with the target enzyme include π–π stacking with aromatic residues, van der Waals contacts with hydrophobic side chains, and local hydrogen bonds or electron-acceptor interactions involving heteroaromatic residues.
From a pharmacological perspective, the precise selection of the aglycone often increases residence time (slower dissociation), allowing for lower effective doses and convenient once-daily regimens. Moreover, these modifications are also used to optimise solubility, metabolic stability, and oral bioavailability [ 20 , 31 ].
3. General Aspects of Flozin Synthesis
The synthesis of flozins is based on forming a C–C bond between the sugar fragment and the aromatic aglycone, resulting in a β-C-glycoside formation ( Scheme 1 ). It exhibits enhanced resistance to enzymatic hydrolysis, particularly intestinal enzymes, compared with natural phlorizin. Up today, glycosyl halides, gluconolactones, sugar epoxides, open-chain hemiketal derivatives, stannanes, boronate glycols, and anhydroglucose derivatives have been employed as sugar donors in flozin synthesis [ 32 ].
Among the reported approaches, the most technologically relevant are those based on protected D-gluconolactone or thio-D-gluconolactone, as in the syntheses of dapagliflozin [ 33 ], empagliflozin [ 34 ], canagliflozin [ 35 ], tofogliflozin [ 36 , 37 ], and luseogliflozin [ 38 ].
In these syntheses, the sugar derivative reacts with the selected aglycone in the form of an organometallic nucleophile. For dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin, the in situ substitution product, bearing a TMS-protected hydroxyl group in the sugar moiety, is subsequently treated with methanol to afford a racemic mixture of C-glycosides featuring an additional methoxy group attached to the anomeric C1 carbon of the sugar ring. This intermediate is then reduced (e.g., using a trifluoroboron etherate/triethylsilane system) to yield the desired β-C-glycoside.
For luseogliflozin and tofogliflozin, condensation of the aglycone with the protected sugar affords an intermediate containing benzyl-protected hydroxyl groups, which, after reduction, leads to the formation of active SGLT inhibitors. In contrast, ipragliflozin is manufactured using activated sugar donors (such as bromoglucosides, triflate glucosides, or phosphate derivatives) that react with the appropriate aglycone in metal-catalysed C-glycosylation reactions. A representative example involves the use of arylzinc species generated by reaction with n -BuLi, followed by transmetalation with a ZnBr/LiBr complex under mild reaction conditions [ 39 ].
The most synthetically challenging route among those discussed is that of ertugliflozin, which proceeds through a 12-step sequence starting from tetra-O-benzyl-D-glucose. This route involves only three isolated intermediates due to the poor crystallinity of most of them. A key feature of this process is the development of a regioselective, large-scale method for the nucleophilic hydroxymethylation of ketogluconamide [ 40 ].
4. General Aspects of SGLT Biology
Proteins of the SGLT family, along with the GLUT proteins and the single human SWEET protein, comprise the full complement of carbohydrate transporters and sensors identified to date in the human body [ 41 ]. The former belong to the mammalian solute carrier family SLC5, which in humans comprises 12 genes encoding proteins that function as transporters or sensors, facilitating the uptake of a wide variety of solutes beyond sugars, ranging from amino acids and vitamins to organic ions [ 42 ]. SGLT proteins are sodium-driven symporters that harness the Na + electrochemical gradient to transport monosaccharides such as D-glucose and D-galactose (and in some isoforms also D-mannose or D-fructose) into cells [ 43 ]. SGLT1 was the first cloned member of the family [ 44 ] and its primary role is absorption of glucose, water and sodium in the gastrointestinal tract. Studies conducted over the years on the functions of this transporter have resulted in a better understanding of treatment targeted at rehydration. Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) is now a key concept in modern medicine, directly relying on the physiological role of SGLT1. However, in contrast to SGLT2 inhibitors, the development of therapeutic agents targeting SGLT1 has not achieved major success [ 45 ].
SGLT2, which shares a 60% sequence homology to SGLT1 [ 46 ], has attracted a lot of attention from medical researchers during recent years. This integral transmembrane protein, comprising 14 alpha-helices, is found in the S1 segment of the proximal convoluted tubule and predominantly mediates glucose reabsorption from the glomerular filtrate [ 46 , 47 ]. SGLT2 is classified as a high-capacity, low-affinity transporter, responsible for approximately 90% of glucose reabsorbed in the nephron. The physiological importance of this transporter is underscored by the fact that mutations in the gene encoding SGLT2 result in familial renal glucosuria [ 48 ]. Unlike SGLT1, its presence is restricted primarily to the kidneys, positioning it as an ideal pharmaceutical target for highly organ-specific intervention [ 49 ]. These unique characteristics have been utilised in the field of diabetology, with SGLT2 inhibitors achieving clinical prominence as a novel glucose-lowering drug group operating through a mechanism of action completely independent of insulin. Studies on conformation of SGLT2 have found differences between the binding site of naturally occurring phlorizin, which binds to the inward-open conformation, and synthetic flozins, which bind to the outward-open conformation [ 29 ] ( Figure 3 ).
5. Risk of Cancer Development Under SGLT2i Treatment
Some of the most common side effects associated with SGLT2i therapy include genitourinary tract infections, euglycemic ketoacidosis and acute kidney injury [ 7 ]. However, in the context of utilising flozins in cancer therapy, it is also reasonable to discuss their potential role in inducing carcinogenesis. This is warranted when considering that another anti-diabetic agent, pioglitazone, has previously been linked to increased risk of bladder cancer [ 50 ]. The role of SGLT2i in the process of neoplastic transformation remains an undeveloped topic, and research in this area is still lacking. The occurring papers are nonuniform, presenting inconsistent results regarding the influence of this drug group on cancer risk, although more sources demonstrate no increase in cancer risk. Disproportionality analysis by Gautier et al. shows an elevated reporting odds ratio for bladder and, to a lesser extent, kidney cancer in populations taking SGLT2i [ 51 ]. It should be noted, however, that the study suggests an association between the risk of reporting bladder and kidney cancer with SGLT2i therapy but does not prove causality due to its limitations. A meta-analysis conducted by Obaid et al. has indicated a higher incidence of several malignancies, including hematologic, breast, thyroid and urinary cancers, in patients treated with SGLT2i for T2DM [ 52 ]. Nevertheless, associations in this study lacked statistical significance, and the evidence for definitive connections remains inconclusive.
On the other hand, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis compared flozins with dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) regarding cancer incidence in people with T2DM. The study revealed that SGLT2i were associated with a significantly reduced risk of prostate, lung and liver neoplasms [ 53 ]. Early concerns that arose, particularly with the introduction of dapagliflozin, regarding an increased risk of cancer [ 54 ], have been thoroughly investigated [ 55 , 56 , 57 ]. To date, there is more literature evidence suggesting that flozins do not increase the likelihood of developing cancer than there is evidence suggesting the opposite. Current meta-analyses and systematic reviews [ 55 , 56 , 57 ] support this statement, although some conflicting results still leave room for further scientific research.
6. Impact on Survival in Cancer Patients
Due to the increased lifespan of people in the modern Western world and advances in therapeutic options, a clinically significant phenomenon has emerged, i.e., some cancer patients now live for many years after their initial diagnosis, often with common chronic diseases coexisting with malignancies. Chemotherapy is known to impact the functions of the cardiovascular and renal system [ 58 , 59 ], which are already fragile and susceptible to damage in older patients with prevalent chronic systemic conditions. This fact gave rise to novel disciplines such as cardio-oncology and nephro-oncology, which aim to view and approach patients holistically [ 60 , 61 ]. Considering this, SGLT2i, with their multifaceted effects, have the potential to play a pivotal role in these areas. This is especially promising, given that they have been shown to improve overall survival among patients with lung and hepatic cancers regardless of tumour characteristics or treatment type [ 62 , 63 ]. A retrospective cohort study on patients treated with SGLT2i in addition to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers revealed that SGLT2i use is associated with improved overall survival in male and female gastrointestinal cancer patients [ 64 ]. This association was evident for oesophageal, gastric, intestinal, anal, intrahepatic bile duct, and pancreatic cancers, but was not observed in gallbladder or extrahepatic biliary tract cancers. The authors also found that hospitalisation rates, hypoglycaemic events, acute kidney failure, and hepatic failure were lower when flozins were used in conjunction with cancer treatment, irrespective of sex. In addition to these advantages, concomitant use of SGLT2i with anticancer agents was not linked to an increased risk of adverse treatment events across any of the gastrointestinal malignancy types examined. Mao et al. studied a large cohort of individuals with T2DM and found that the addition of SGLT2i to metformin was associated with approximately 60% reduction in colorectal cancer-related mortality compared with metformin alone [ 65 ]. A recent meta-analysis including data from over 270,000 T2DM patients, published in 2025, reported promising results by linking SGLT2i use to a 30% decrease in breast cancer mortality, when compared to DPP-4i treatment [ 66 ]. Such effects of flozins on oncological outcomes are encouraging, however, further investigations in the field are still required.
7. Cardioprotective Effects of SGLT2i in Oncological Patients
Some members of SGLTi family revolutionised our approach to treating patients with chronic HF and are now routinely prescribed for this indication. Left ventricular myocardial dysfunction and HF are common problems in patients treated with anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin. Other cardiovascular implications linked to anticancer agents include myocarditis, mainly after immune checkpoint therapy, fluoropyrimidines-associated coronary artery disease or valvular fibrosis after radiotherapy [ 60 ]. The cardioprotective effect of flozins may hence be utilised to help mitigate these risks. A 2024 retrospective cohort analysis found that patients with a history of T2DM, cancer, and exposure to potentially cardiotoxic antineoplastic therapies benefited from the addition of SGLT2i to conventional guideline-directed medications [ 67 ]. The study looked at data from 1280 individuals and therapy outcomes over a 2-year follow-up period, showing that incorporation of SGLT2i resulted in a lower risk of acute HF exacerbation and decreased all-cause mortality. The most prevalent neoplasms included in this paper were haematological, gastrointestinal, and breast cancers. Another retrospective cohort study included a group of 933 patients aged 65 or older treated with anthracycline, and without previously diagnosed HF [ 68 ]. After analysing data from a median follow-up of 1.6 years, the authors concluded that SGLT2i exposure reduced the risk of hospitalisation due to HF. However, the data did not reach statistical significance with regard to the incidence of this disease or overall mortality. One more study involving patients with T2DM and anticancer therapy with anthracyclines revealed that SGLT2i therapy decreased the number of cardiac events in adult patients [ 69 ]. The results cited above shed light on the ability of flozins to counteract cardiotoxicity, an ever-emerging burden in oncology, and their role in improving the survival chances of cancer patients opens the possibility of a wider range of applications. As of now, three ongoing clinical trials are showing SGLT2i as an intervention in assessing their role in the prevention of cardiotoxicity ( NCT06888505 , NCT06844669 , NCT05271162 ) [ 70 ]. Results from randomised clinical trials on this topic are necessary and will provide more reliable data compared to retrospective cohort studies available in medical databases.
8. Mechanisms of Cardioprotective Functions of SGLT2i
Cardiovascular actions of SGLT2i are well-established and commonly used in clinical settings, but the mechanisms of action behind these effects remain not completely understood. Their main feature, first utilised in their original, antidiabetic function, which is blocking SGLT2 proteins in the proximal tubules of nephrons, certainly provides benefits for the whole cardiovascular system.
However, this alone is not enough to fully account for the observable advantages of this group of drugs. Blocking renal glucose reabsorption leads to a decrease in glycaemia, which in itself is beneficial for endothelial condition and may in turn prevent micro- and macrovascular damage and complications [ 71 ], so often associated with T2DM. SGLT2i not only increase urinary glucose elimination but also promote sodium excretion through osmotic diuresis, thereby reducing the volume of the circulating plasma and blood pressure [ 72 , 73 ]. This basic mechanism, simple in principle, helps the cardiovascular system by reducing preload, which improves the heart’s haemodynamics. Analysing MRI data revealed that empagliflozin therapy reduces end diastolic volume, which is a favourable change in cardiac function [ 74 ]. In addition to this, SGLT2i have been reported to reduce afterload by limiting arterial stiffness and vascular resistance [ 75 , 76 ], which, together with lowering blood pressure, helps alleviate cardiac workload.
Heart function is also enhanced by flozins through another important mechanism. They shift myocardial and renal fuel metabolism balance from fat and glucose to ketone bodies [ 77 ]. Patients taking SGLT2i have been found to have elevated plasma levels of β-hydroxybutyrate, marking increased lipid oxidation [ 78 ]. For myocardium, one of the main organs capable of utilising these compounds, such a transition in energy source is shown to be beneficial. Ketone bodies as a fuel are more efficient, as they produce more ATP per atom of oxygen compared with glucose or free fatty acids [ 77 ]. This effect possibly plays a crucial role in supporting cardiomyocytes in the dysfunctional heart after cardiotoxic anticancer therapy, by providing them with additional energy.
Insufficient heart function may be addressed by altering the disrupted structure of the myocardium. Empagliflozin has been demonstrated to alter left ventricular mass indexed to body surface [ 79 ]. The founding of reduced wall thickness is noteworthy, as greater thickness of the left ventricle is associated with the risk of sudden death [ 80 ]. Fibrosis is another element playing an important role in the pathological changes in the insufficient heart. In an animal model of myocardial infarction, dapagliflozin has been shown to halt fibrotic processes [ 81 ]. In animal models of T2DM and hypertension, the suppression of excess connective tissue accumulation by SGLT2i was also observed [ 82 , 83 ] ( Figure 4 ).
9. Nephroprotective Effects of SGLT2i in Oncological Patients
Kidneys, like the heart, are often susceptible to damage in patients treated with chemotherapeutics. This observation has laid the groundwork for nephro-oncology, a discipline focused on kidney function in relation to anticancer therapy. It is not limited to the proper adjusting of drug doses based on altered renal clearance, but also addresses the significant issue of the direct and indirect roles of oncological drugs in the development of renal pathologies [ 61 ]. The problem is of particular importance, as approximately 20% of cancer patients may have chronic renal dysfunction [ 84 ].
Dapagliflozin has been shown to have kidney-protective effects in patients with CKD regardless of the presence of T2DM, increasing the chance of maintaining eGFR while reducing the risk of developing end-stage kidney disease and, notably, death from renal causes [ 85 ]. Empagliflozin was also studied in the same context, and the results were similar [ 23 ], thereby introducing these antidiabetic agents fully to the nephrology field. This kind of nephroprotection may play a significant role in the future of holistic oncology, as decreased eGFR and proteinuria were associated with mortality risk in patients with certain types of cancers [ 86 ]. The ability of chemotherapeutics to damage virtually every site of the nephron [ 87 ], along with the fact that immunological systemic mediators engaged in the response to cancer may impair kidney function, makes pharmacological strategies aimed at preserving glomerular capacity crucial.
10. Mechanisms of Nephroprotective Functions of SGLT2i
SGLT2i’s remarkable impact on the kidneys cannot be fully explained by previously mentioned reductions in blood pressure and glycaemia, especially since they are known to be rather modest diuretics and have a moderate hypoglycaemic effect compared to other drugs. Early stages of CKD may be associated with insufficient oxygen supply to the renal tissues; however, the topic of hypoxia in CKD is far more intricate than a simple decrease in oxygen delivery [ 88 ]. Nevertheless, there is a possibility that flozins improve kidney energy balance by an increase in the utilisation of non-glucose metabolic fuels, similarly to the process described in relation to the myocardium. Ketone bodies, in such a bioenergetically active organ as the kidney, may constitute a helpful role as a caloric source, since their oxidation is of greater efficiency compared to glucose [ 77 ].
Increased natriuresis, alongside glucosuria, due to SGLT2i ion channels blockade, is suspected to restore tubuloglomerular feedback through acting on the juxtaglomerular apparatus, and normalising eGFR in type 1 diabetic patients [ 89 ]. This study showed afferent arteriole vasoconstriction and a reduction in eGFR, which may seem counterintuitive in the context of the overall nephroprotective effects of flozins. Hyperfiltration is a common renal abnormality in these patients, and such a change is considered beneficial.
Through these types of alterations in local renal haemodynamics, with the addition of the putative metabolic signal of β-hydroxybutyrate, the synthesis of erythropoietin is subsequently augmented [ 90 ]. This stimulates erythrocyte production and increases haematocrit, which in turn enhances the ability of blood to transport oxygen to the tissues ( Figure 5 ).
11. Impact of SGLT2i on Obesity in the Context of Cancer
Obesity and overweight have become a global problem in recent decades, even referred to as a modern-day pandemic and one of the greatest medical problems of developed countries. More than 107 million children and 603 million adults suffer from obesity, and patients with pathologically increased body weight are encountered across all areas of medicine and constitute an increasing proportion of those being treated [ 91 ]. High body mass index (BMI) is widely known to increase the risk of many diseases, with cardiovascular disease as the most well-documented and recognised [ 92 ]. As cancer emerges as one of the greatest threats to future societies, numerous studies have examined the relationship between obesity and cancer predisposition. These studies have provided findings that suggest a causation [ 93 ].
Obesity is a well-established risk for numerous cancers as well as recurrence. It is found to significantly increase the risk of developing post-menopausal breast, colorectal, endometrial, kidney, oesophageal, pancreatic, liver, and gallbladder cancer [ 94 ]. Approximately 20% of cancer cases are attributed to obesity [ 95 ]. Studies have shown that for every 5 kg/m 2 increase in body mass index, cancer mortality increases by 10% [ 96 ]. In the case of breast cancer, obesity increases the risk of recurrence and mortality. Women who are overweight or obese at the time of diagnosis are at greater risk of poor treatment outcomes [ 97 , 98 , 99 ]. Obesity creates a specific adipose tissue microenvironment that promotes cancer progression and recurrence [ 100 ]. The mechanisms linking obesity to cancer recurrence involve multiple pathways, including insulin and insulin-like growth factors, sex steroids, adipokines, chronic inflammation, and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling cascade [ 100 ]. Investigating the weight-loss effects of SGLT2i may further solidify their potential role in oncology.
A drug class effect of inducing diuretic osmosis leads to the loss of glucose in urine. This results in lowering glycaemia and reducing the availability of calories for every system of the body. Unlike another important group of T2DM drugs: glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists, they are not registered for obesity treatment, but flozins were nonetheless found to exert weight-reducing effects. A randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial demonstrated that canagliflozin at a 300 mg dose was associated with a mean weight loss of 2.9 kg in diabetic patients [ 101 ]. Another phase 3 trial with canagliflozin showed consistent results, reporting an even greater mean change (−4 kg) [ 102 ]. Interestingly, this paper noted that approximately two-thirds of the loss constituted fat tissue, while the remaining one-third was lean mass, indicating a favourable composition profile. Other SGLT2i have also been reported to decrease body weight [ 103 , 104 ]. Tosaki et al. examined the effect of this drug group on the fat tissue of T2DM patients and observed a significant decrease in estimated visceral fat area as well as a decrease in waist circumference [ 105 ]. Since visceral adipose tissue is known to correlate more strongly with metabolic abnormalities compared to subcutaneous deposits [ 106 ], the ability of the drug to reduce the amount of fat in this localisation represents a very favourable trait.
The observable fat-reducing effect may be interlinked with the previously described shift in metabolic energy sources in tissues under SGLT2i activity. By promoting the use of ketone bodies, these drugs accelerate lipolysis, enhance fat oxidation, and stimulate ketogenesis [ 78 ], processes that contribute to the reduction in fat reservoirs. Adipose tissue often is described as acting like an endocrine organ, being an abundant systemic source of adipokines, such as leptin. There is evidence that leptin promotes tumour cell proliferation in a variety of cancer cell types, and its elevated levels have been associated with several neoplasms, including breast, colorectal and thyroid cancers [ 107 ]. Thus, reducing fat tissue adds another rationale to the use of SGLT2i in cancer patients.
12. Anticancer Activity of SGLT2i
The invention of chemotherapeutics and its introduction to the medical world have helped millions of people and constituted a milestone in oncology, providing an alternative or support to often highly invasive and disfiguring surgical interventions. Unfortunately, a success over uncontrollably proliferating cells has not been achieved, as they are very prone to developing resistance to numerous agents, similarly to microbes in the field of infectious disease [ 108 ]. To address this major clinical problem, many strategies have been developed and facilitated over the years, one of them being the search for anticancer agents acting through a wide variety of mechanisms and incorporating them into polytherapy, often in expectation of a synergistic effect, or creating multiple lines of treatment. The process of developing new oncological compounds requires a lot of time and resources, so the repurposing of existing drugs, with proven safety profiles and documented antitumour activity, represents a very promising direction. In this context, the potential anticancer role of SGLT2i may be worth considering and discussing.
Preliminary trials conducted in mouse models with xenografts of pancreatic and prostate tumours revealed that canagliflozin reduced the tumour growth rate by approximately 30%, whereas dapagliflozin did not exhibit this effect. Additionally, both drugs have been reported to increase tumour necrosis by 70–100% [ 109 ]. Another study involving a xenografted hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) model showed that canagliflozin inhibits lesion enlargement, notably independently of alterations in blood glucose levels, and significantly prolongs the survival of mice [ 110 ]. Zhou et al. subsequently evaluated the effect of dapagliflozin on breast tumour growth in a xenograft mouse model with athymic nude mice [ 111 ]. They discovered a substantial slowing of neoplasm growth and assessed tumour cell viability using Ki67 immunohistochemical staining, which confirmed the reduced proliferative capacity of these cells. Similarly, another study showed a reduction in tumour growth rate under dapagliflozin treatment in a diet-induced obesity and hyperinsulinemia mouse model of breast and colorectal cancer. The researchers also revealed that the tumour-slowing effect was insulin-dependent, and restoring high insulin levels reversed the drug’s effects [ 112 ]. Canagliflozin was found to decrease the uptake of a PET tracer reflecting glucose utilisation in early-stage lung adenocarcinomas and, when administered in the presence of premalignant lesions, significantly delayed tumour onset and markedly reduced the total tumour burden in mice [ 113 ]. In another experimental setting, canagliflozin use also led to a pronounced decrease in mean tumour weight and volume—by 35% and 56%, respectively—in a chemically induced breast cancer model in female rats [ 114 ]. The effects of canagliflozin on prostate tumour growth in mouse xenograft models using PC3 and 22RV1 cell lines were also evaluated. Mice were treated with canagliflozin administered orally in the diet, a single 5 Gy dose of radiotherapy, or a combination of both. Canagliflozin alone slowed the growth of PC3 tumours by approximately 45%, a magnitude comparable to radiation, while in 22RV1 tumours, the time to reach endpoint increased from 18 days in controls to 30 days with the drug. When canagliflozin was combined with radiotherapy, tumour progression was markedly delayed, with endpoint growth observed around 50 days. These findings were consistent across in vivo measurements and ex vivo analyses of tumour volume and weight. Kaplan–Meier survival curves further demonstrated that canagliflozin treatment improved overall survival, with the combination therapy producing the most pronounced benefit. Overall, these results highlight the significant potential of canagliflozin to slow tumour growth and enhance the effects of radiotherapy in prostate cancer models [ 115 ]. Another member of SGLT2i class, empagliflozin, was shown to regress malignant changes in the hepatic parenchyma in a mouse model of diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. Empagliflozin treatment also reduced the serum levels of liver damage markers (AST, ALT, γ-GT) and AFP, a marker of tumour activity [ 116 ]. Additionally, high doses of this agent substantially reduced the count of lung bioluminescence as well as the number of lung nodules in a breast cancer animal model. Empagliflozin therapy was therefore suggested to lower tumour burden in the mice’s thoracic and peritoneal cavity, effectively delaying metastatic development [ 117 ]. Tofogliflozin was found to markedly reduce the number of liver tumours developing in an animal model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a condition that predisposes to HCC, and increased the survival rate of treated mice [ 118 ]. It also decreased the number of colorectal pre-neoplastic lesions in diabetic and obese mice, presumably through attenuation of chronic inflammation [ 119 ].
Similarly, canagliflozin exhibited antisteatotic effects and attenuated the progression of NASH to HCC [ 120 ]. As can be seen, SGLT2i present anticancer activity in preclinical studies on a broad range of neoplasm types, which is particularly encouraging ( Table 2 ). Animal studies, however, cannot replace human trials, and we should be cautious when extrapolating these findings to clinical settings, marking a need for further studies of high importance.
SGLT2i have the potential to augment existing therapies by exhibiting synergistic activity in combination with known anticancer agents. In an animal study, gemcitabine, a cytostatic agent representing a pyrimidine antimetabolite used in many types of cancer, was shown to reduce neoplasm growth but without inducing necrosis [ 12 ]. The authors concluded that the addition of canagliflozin to gemcitabine not only potentiated gemcitabine’s effect on pancreatic cancer tumour growth but also increased tumour necrosis. Cisplatin, a standard regimen for HCC treatment but prone to cancer resistance [ 123 , 124 ], has been evaluated in combination with canagliflozin in an animal model of this neoplasm. The study revealed that combining SGLT2i with cisplatin significantly decreased relative tumour volume and inhibited the development of chemotherapy resistance. Histopathological evaluation of the liver and kidney showed no evidence of distant organ damage with the addition of SGLT2i [ 125 ]. Canagliflozin has also been reported to positively contribute to the anticancer effect of sorafenib. Combining SGLT2i with this protein kinase inhibitor, which has well-established use in primary renal and liver cancer, caused a marked increase in cell death and a decrease in 3D hepatocellular cancer spheroid tumour models [ 126 ]. Although both drugs slowed xenograft tumour growth in mice, the combined treatment achieved an almost complete termination of this progression. Another chemotherapeutic whose efficacy may be enhanced by the incorporation of flozins into polytherapy is paclitaxel, an antimitotic agent inhibiting microtubule depolymerisation. In a study from 2022, dapagliflozin and paclitaxel showed a synergistic effect against breast cancer [ 127 ]. This SGLT2i member enhanced the reduction in tumour glucose uptake and improved median survival in tumour-bearing mice. The assessment of genetic drivers of breast cancer performed by the authors revealed, however, that dapagliflozin acted synergistically only in neoplasms driven by certain types of mutations and not others, emphasising the molecular intricacies of flozins’ cellular targets and pointing toward the future relevance of targeted therapies.
13. Molecular Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity of SGLT2i
As noted earlier, SGLT2i decrease glycaemia, thus reducing systemic glucose availability for the tumour and depriving it of this preferred carbohydrate fuel. This, however, is not the only presumed mechanism of anticancer action, as flozins have much to offer in this regard, interfering with cancer cell replication, metabolism, cell cycle systems of control, and more ( Figure 6 ).
SGLT2i not only lower systemic glucose availability but also limit its local supply to the tumour. Previously mentioned presence of SGLT2 proteins in many neoplasm types [ 11 , 12 , 13 ] offers a potential therapeutic target for restricting metabolic fuel uptake by cancer cells and thereby negatively influencing their molecular mechanisms. SGLT2i have been reported to suppress leukaemic cells from patients with adult T-cell leukaemia, by attenuation of glucose uptake, intracellular level of ATP and NADPH, which was likely linked to SGLT2 blockade and independent of apoptosis [ 128 ].
The effects of flozins on glucose transporters may not be limited to SGLT, as there is evidence that canagliflozin can nonselectively inhibit more than one isoform of GLUT [ 129 ]. In the same study, authors showed that canagliflozin attenuates glucose influx-induced β-catenin signalling activation through promoting its proteasome degradation.
Mutations of genes engaged in the WNT/β-catenin signalling pathway are significant genetic events in the development of hepatic cancers, and the overactivity of the pathway has also been implicated in cancer stemness, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance [ 110 ]. Promotion of the degradation of β-catenin by canagliflozin is a particularly promising feature, as β-catenin upregulation is tumour-specific, found in the liver tumour cells, not in the adjacent non-tumour tissues, and associated with poor differentiation [ 129 ]. Another mechanism responsible for halting cell proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma by canagliflozin was also reported [ 130 ]. This SGLT2i drug suppressed the proliferation of Hep3B and Huh7 cells in a dose-dependent manner, and cell cycle analysis demonstrated G2/M transition arrest, with apoptosis as a secondary mechanism. In both cell populations, proteomic findings indicated that mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation was suppressed. Consistent with that, intracellular ATP levels were decreased by canagliflozin treatment [ 130 ]. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), involved in the control of metabolic energy homeostasis and cell growth, is regarded as an important tumour suppressor [ 131 , 132 ]. The activation of this kinase through phosphorylation was found to increase upon empagliflozin intervention [ 133 ]. Elevated phosphorylated AMPK levels were believed to lead to the inhibition of cervical cancer cell proliferation and migration, ultimately through downregulating the expression of SHH, a key regulator in the sonic hedgehog pathway. Aberrations in this pathway have been linked to the development of diverse neoplasms in humans and to the phenomenon of drug resistance [ 134 ]. Empagliflozin has further been reported to increase the expression of miR-128-3p, a tumour suppressor miRNA often downregulated in breast cancer. This change was associated with reduced expression of CD98hc, which in turn predisposes breast cancer cells to ferroptosis, a form of programmed cell death dependent on iron metabolism dysregulation [ 117 ]. In prostate cancer studies, canagliflozin showed inhibition of the activity of mitochondrial complex I, leading to the activation of AMPK and followed by the inhibition of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) pathways. This resulted in reduced cell proliferation and survival. Canagliflozin also induced transcriptional reprogramming by inhibiting the expression of genes associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer, including genes linked to the MAPK/ERK pathway. These effects were observed in both androgen-sensitive and androgen-insensitive prostate cancer models [ 115 ]. SGLT2i exhibit multifaceted actions at the cellular level through multiple molecular mechanisms, resulting in a broad range of biological outcomes ( Table 3 ).
14. Materials and Methods
Two independent researchers searched the medical database PubMed and ASC Publications database using phrases including the name of the drug group or its specific members and additional terms. Phrases used in the search included “SGLT2i synthesis”, “SGLT2i cancer”, “SGLT2i nephroprotection”, “SGLT2i cardioprotection mechanisms”, “canagliflozin anticancer”, etc. We included original papers, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and meta-analyses published in English. References from identified papers were screened, and additional relevant studies were incorporated where appropriate. In total, we collected 152 articles, of which 137 were ultimately selected, including papers discussing epidemiological aspects and cancer-related topics. Studies briefly mentioning SGLT2i in the context of cancer were excluded. The graphical abstract and Figure 4 , Figure 5 and Figure 6 were generated using Gemini 2.5 Pro based on original Figures created by the authors. No generative AI tools were used to create or modify the scientific data or textual content.
15. Conclusions
SGLT2is represent a promising group of drugs with considerable potential to enter oncology and provide additional therapeutic value for many patients. Specific modifications within the flozin scaffold, especially in the aromatic fragments, appear to be a crucial, yet underexplored, avenue for possibly enhancing the anticancer effect. This points to a significant R&D opportunity for the design of novel, next-generation SGLT2i, which would exhibit a potent tumour growth inhibition. Engineering bifunctional agents that could concurrently target oncogenic pathways and restore altered metabolic homeostasis constitutes a fertile ground for medicinal and synthetic chemists. In order to progress in this area, research on complex relationships between structure and activity is needed.
Based on the reviewed literature, flozins appear safe with respect to the risk of carcinogenesis and have been shown in numerous studies to exhibit a positive effect on the course of cancer. Longer-living cancer patients increasingly require long-term, comprehensive internal medicine care and a holistic approach, with flozins fitting very well into such a vision of medical oncology. Their profound positive effects on the interconnected cardiovascular and renal systems may translate into improved patient outcomes and enhanced quality of life. In addition to their systemic activity, SGLT2i can act on a plethora of mechanisms directly affecting tumour cells. The identified anticancer actions included the ability to suppress malignant proliferation, and it is worth noting the potential of flozins to enhance the activity of widely used chemotherapeutics such as gemcitabine or sorafenib. The observed synergism reinforces the notion that SGLT2i may have a place in the oncology of the future. Taken together, the pleiotropic systemic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors—spanning cardiovascular, renal, metabolic and inflammatory domains—create a strong rationale for exploring their role in oncology, both as supportive therapy and as potential direct anticancer agents.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our colleague Joanna Tobiasz from the Łukasiewicz Research Network–Industrial Chemistry Institute in Warsaw, Poland, for her support. We would like to thank Jamie Wojtasinski for consulting on the linguistic correctness of this publication.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Author Contributions
Conceptualisation, M.C.; literature search and data analysis, M.Z. and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z., M.C., M.R. and O.M., writing—review and editing, M.Z. and M.C.; funding acquisition, M.C. and O.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
This study did not generate any new data. All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADAM10 a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 10 AFU alpha-L-fucosidase AFP alpha-fetoprotein AKT protein kinase B AMPK AMP-activated protein kinase ALT alanine aminotransferase AST aspartate aminotransferase ATP adenosine triphosphate CD4+ T cells cluster of differentiation 4-positive T cells CD8+ T cells cluster of differentiation 8-positive T cells CD98hc cluster of differentiation 98 heavy chain CEA carcinoembryonic antigen CKD chronic kidney disease DPP-4i dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors DDR1 discoidin domain receptor 1 ERK extracellular signal-regulated kinase GSH glutathione GLUT glucose transporters γ-GT gamma-glutamyl transferase HCC hepatocellular carcinoma HFrEF heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HF heart failure HIF-1α hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha IFN-β interferon-beta IRF3 interferon regulatory factor 3 MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinase miR-128-3p microRNA-128-3p mTORC1 mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 NASH non-alcoholic steatohepatitis OXPHOS oxidative phosphorylation PP2A protein phosphatase 2A ROS reactive oxygen species SGLT sodium–glucose cotransporter SGLT2 sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 SHH sonic hedgehog SOD superoxide dismutase STING stimulator of interferon genes WNT/β-catenin wingless-integrated/β-catenin
References
1. Pușcașu C. Zanfirescu A. Negreș S. Șeremet O.C. Exploring the multifaceted potential of sildenafil in medicine Medicina 2023 59 2190 10.3390/medicina59122190 38138293 PMC10744870
2. Franks M.E. Macpherson G.R. Figg W.D. Thalidomide Lancet 2004 363 1802 1811 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16308-3 15172781
3. Al-Majed A.A. Bakheit A.H.H. Abdel Aziz H.A. Alajmi F.M. AlRabiah H. Propranolol Profiles Drug Subst. Excip. Relat. Methodol. 2017 42 287 338 10.1016/Bs.podrm.2017.02.006 28431779
4. Puig L. Methotrexate: New therapeutic approaches Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014 105 583 589 10.1016/j.ad.2012.11.017 23434058
5. Parvathaneni V. Kulkarni N.S. Muth A. Gupta V. Drug repurposing: A promising tool to accelerate the drug discovery process Drug Discov. Today. 2019 24 2076 2085 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.014 31238113 PMC11920972
6. Pabel S. Hamdani N. Luedde M. Sossalla S. SGLT2 inhibitors and their mode of action in heart failure—Has the mystery been unravelled? Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2021 18 315 328 10.1007/s11897-021-00529-8 34523061 PMC8484236
7. Garofalo C. Borrelli S. Liberti M.E. Andreucci M. Conte G. Minutolo R. Provenzano M. De Nicola L. SGLT2 inhibitors: Nephroprotective efficacy and side effects Medicina 2019 55 268 10.3390/medicina55060268 31212638 PMC6630922
8. Tufail M. Jiang C.H. Li N. Altered metabolism in cancer: Insights into energy pathways and therapeutic targets Mol. Cancer 2024 23 203 10.1186/s12943-024-02119-3 39294640 PMC11409553
9. Nath S. Balling R. The Warburg effect reinterpreted 100 yr on: A first-principles stoichiometric analysis and interpretation from the perspective of ATP metabolism in cancer cells Function 2024 5 zqae008 10.1093/function/zqae008 38706962 PMC11065116
10. Zhao J. Jin D. Huang M. Ji J. Xu X. Wang F. Zhou L. Bao B. Jiang F. Xu W. Glycolysis in the tumor microenvironment: A driver of cancer progression and a promising therapeutic target Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024 12 1416472 10.3389/fcell.2024.1416472 38933335 PMC11199735
11. Ren D. Sun Y. Zhang D. Li D. Liu Z. Jin X. Wu H. SGLT2 promotes pancreatic cancer progression by activating the Hippo signaling pathway via the hnRNPK–YAP1 axis Cancer Lett. 2021 519 277 288 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.07.035 34314754
12. Scafoglio C. Hirayama B.A. Kepe V. Liu J. Ghezzi C. Satyamurthy N. Moatamed N.A. Huang J. Koepsell H. Barrio J.R. Functional expression of sodium–glucose transporters in cancer Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015 112 E4111 E4119 10.1073/pnas.1511698112 26170283 PMC4522748
13. Iwai S. Motono N. Oyama T. Shioya A. Yamada S. Uramoto H. The clinical relevance of the expression of SGLT2 in lung adenocarcinoma Oncology 2024 102 710 719 10.1159/000536060 38232717
14. Tinajero M.G. Malik V.S. An update on the epidemiology of type 2 diabetes: A global perspective Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2021 50 337 355 10.1016/j.ecl.2021.05.013 34399949
15. Blüher M. Obesity: Global epidemiology and pathogenesis Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019 15 288 298 10.1038/s41574-019-0176-8 30814686
16. Shikata K. Ninomiya T. Kiyohara Y. Diabetes mellitus and cancer risk: Review of the epidemiological evidence Cancer Sci. 2013 104 9 14 10.1111/cas.12043 23066889 PMC7657146
17. Avgerinos K.I. Spyrou N. Mantzoros C.S. Dalamaga M. Obesity and cancer risk: Emerging biological mechanisms and perspectives Metabolism 2019 92 121 135 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.001 30445141
18. De Beer J.C. Liebenberg L. Does cancer risk increase with HbA1c, independent of diabetes? Br. J. Cancer. 2014 110 2361 2368 10.1038/bjc.2014.150 24675382 PMC4007234
19. Jampilek J. Heterocycles in Medicinal Chemistry Molecules 2019 24 3839 10.3390/molecules24213839 31731387 PMC6864827
20. Niu Y. Liu R. Guan C. Zhang Y. Chen Z. Hoerer S. Nar H. Chen L. Structural basis of inhibition of the human SGLT2–MAP17 glucose transporter Nature 2022 601 280 284 10.1038/s41586-021-04212-9 34880493
21. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Story of Discovery: SGLT2 Inhibitors: Harnessing the Kidneys to Help Treat Diabetes 2016 Available online: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/news/archive/2016/story-discovery-sglt2-inhibitors-harnessing-kidneys-help-treat-diabetes (accessed on 3 November 2025)
22. Solomon S.D. McMurray J.J.V. Claggett B. de Boer R.A. DeMets D. Hernandez A.F. Inzucchi S.E. Kosiborod M.N. Lam C.S.P. Martinez F. Dapagliflozin in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction N. Engl. J. Med. 2022 387 1089 1098 10.1056/NEJMoa2206286 36027570
23. Herrington W.G. Staplin N. Wanner C. Green J.B. Hauske S.J. Emberson J.R. Preiss D. Judge P. Mayne K.J. Ng S.Y.A. Empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2023 388 117 127 10.1056/NEJMoa2204233 36331190 PMC7614055
24. Fernandez-Fernandez B. Sarafidis P. Kanbay M. Navarro-González J.F. Soler M.J. Górriz J.L. Ortiz A. SGLT2 inhibitors for non-diabetic kidney disease: Drugs to treat CKD that also improve glycaemia Clin. Kidney J. 2020 13 728 733 10.1093/ckj/sfaa198 33123352 PMC7577767
25. McDonagh T.A. Metra M. Adamo M. Gardner R.S. Baumbach A. Böhm M. Burri H. Butler J. Čelutkienė J. Chioncel O. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure Eur. Heart J. 2021 42 3599 3726 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368 34447992
26. McDonagh T.A. Metra M. Adamo M. Gardner R.S. Baumbach A. Böhm M. Burri H. Butler J. Čelutkienė J. Chioncel O. 2023 Focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure Eur. Heart J. 2023 44 3627 3639 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195 37622666
27. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease Kidney Int. 2024 105 S117 S314 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018 38490803
28. Ohkura K. Tabata A. Molecular Aspects of C -glycosides: Interactive Analysis of C-linked Compounds with the SGLT2 Molecular Model Anticancer Res. 2023 43 3747 3754 10.21873/anticanres.16559 37500162
29. Mazoudji A. Ecker G.F. Docking-Based Classification of SGLT2 Inhibitors Molecules 2025 30 2179 10.3390/molecules30102179 40430352 PMC12114233
30. Lloyd A. Austin-Muttitt K. Mullins J.G.L. Computational structural studies of SGLT2-related polypharmacy PLoS ONE 2025 20 e0334656 10.1371/journal.pone.0334656 41105702 PMC12533862
31. Bhagya G. Namini M. Girish B.S. Srinivasan R. Advancements in SGLT2 Inhibitors: Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Clinical Efficacy With a Focus on Pharmacogenomics Prospect. Pharm. Sci. 2025 23 116 128 10.56782/pps.274
32. Aguillon A.R. Mascarello A. Segretti N.D. de Azevedo H.F.Z. Guimaraes C.R.W. Miranda L.S.M. de Souza R.O.M.A. Synthetic Strategies toward SGLT2 Inhibitors Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018 22 467 488 10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00017
33. Yu J. Cao Y. Yu H. Wang Y. A Concise and Efficient Synthesis of Dapagliflozin Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019 23 1458 1461 10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00141
34. Wang X.J. Zhang L. Byrne D. Nummy L. Weber D. Krishnamurthy D. Yee N. Senanayake C.H. Efficient synthesis of Empagliflozin, an inhibitor of SGLT-2, utilizing an AlCl3-promoted silane reduction of a β-glycopyranoside Org. Lett. 2014 16 4090 4093 10.1021/ol501755h 25061799
35. Metil D.S. Sonawane S.P. Pachore S.S. Mohammad A. Synthesis and Optimization of Canagliflozin by Employing Quality by Design (QbD) Principles Org. Process Res. Dev. 2018 22 27 39 10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00281
36. Ohtake Y. Emura T. Nishimoto M. Takano K. Yamamoto K. Tsuchiya S. Yeu S.Y. Kito Y. Kimura N. Takeda S. Development of a Scalable Synthesis of Tofogliflozin J. Org. Chem. 2016 81 2148 2153 10.1021/acs.joc.5b02734 26871504
37. Yang X.D. Pan Z. Li D. Wang G. Liu M. Wu R.G. Wu Y.H. Gao Y.C. A Scalable Synthesis of Tofogliflozin Hydrate Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016 20 1821 1827 10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00175
38. Kakinuma H. Oi T. Hashimoto-Tsuchiya Y. Arai M. Kawakita Y. Fukasawa Y. Iida I. Hagima N. Takeuchi H. Chino Y. (1S)-1,5-Anhydro-1-[5-(4-ethoxybenzyl)-2-methoxy-4-methylphenyl]-1-thio-d-glucitol (TS-071) is a Potent, Selective Sodium-Dependent Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitor for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment J. Med. Chem. 2010 53 3247 3261 10.1021/jm901893x 20302302
39. Ma S. Liu Z. Pan J. Zhang S. Zhou W. A concise and practical stereoselective synthesis of ipragliflozin L-proline Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017 13 1064 1070 10.3762/bjoc.13.105 28684985 PMC5480354
40. Bowles P. Brenek S.J. Caron S. Do N.M. Drexler M.T. Duan S. Dubé P. Hansen E.C. Jones B.P. Jones K.N. Commercial Route Research and Development for SGLT2 Inhibitor Candidate Ertugliflozin Org. Process Res. Dev. 2014 18 66 81 10.1021/op4002802
41. Deng D. Yan N. GLUT, SGLT, and SWEET: Structural and mechanistic investigations of the glucose transporters Protein Sci. 2016 25 546 558 10.1002/pro.2858 26650681 PMC4815417
42. Gyimesi G. Pujol-Giménez J. Kanai Y. Hediger M.A. Sodium-coupled glucose transport, the SLC5 family, and therapeutically relevant inhibitors: From molecular discovery to clinical application Pflug. Arch. 2020 472 1177 1206 10.1007/s00424-020-02433-x PMC7462921 32767111
43. Kamitori K. Shirota M. Fujiwara Y. Structural basis of the selective sugar transport in sodium-glucose cotransporters J. Mol. Biol. 2022 434 167464 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167464 35077764
44. Hediger M.A. Turk E. Wright E.M. Homology of the human intestinal Na + /glucose and Escherichia coli Na + /proline cotransporters Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989 86 5748 5752 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5748 2490366 PMC297707
45. Long A. Salvo M. Sotagliflozin: Efficacy, safety, and potential therapeutic applications in heart failure Ann. Pharmacother. 2023 58 935 946 10.1177/10600280231211179 38014844
46. Stielow M. Fijałkowski Ł. Alaburda A. Grześk G. Grześk E. Nowaczyk J. Nowaczyk A. SGLT2 inhibitors: From molecular mechanisms to clinical outcomes in cardiology and diabetology Molecules 2025 30 3112 10.3390/molecules30153112 40807290 PMC12348473
47. You G. Lee W.S. Barros E.J. Kanai Y. Huo T.L. Khawaja S. Wells R.G. Nigam S.K. Hediger M.A. Molecular characteristics of Na(+)-coupled glucose transporters in adult and embryonic rat kidney J. Biol. Chem. 1995 270 29365 29371 10.1074/jbc.270.49.29365 7493971
48. Torun Bayram M. Kavukcu S. Renal glucosuria in children World J. Clin. Pediatr. 2025 14 91622 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i1.91622 40059893 PMC11686576
49. Chao E.C. Henry R.R. SGLT2 inhibition: A novel strategy for diabetes treatment Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010 9 551 559 10.1038/nrd3180 20508640
50. Tang H. Shi W. Fu S. Wang T. Zhai S. Song Y. Han J. Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis Cancer Med. 2018 7 1070 1080 10.1002/cam4.1354 29476615 PMC5911601
51. Gautier P. Elbaz M. Bouisset F. Despas F. Montastruc F. Investigating risk of cancer with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: A disproportionality analysis in the WHO global pharmacovigilance database VigiBase ® Drug Saf. 2025 48 933 941 10.1007/s40264-025-01546-5 40232585 PMC12259762
52. Obaid M.I. Shahzad M.S. Latif F. Khan M.H. Akram M. Rizvi S.A.M. Nasrullah R.M.U. Asad D. Obaid M.A. Relationship between SGLT2 inhibitor use and specific cancer types: A systematic review and meta-analysis Future Sci. OA 2024 10 2400797 10.1080/20565623.2024.2400797 39344829 PMC11444652
53. Hajishah H. Mazloom P. Salehi A. Kazemi D. Samiee R. Majlesi H. Amini M.J. Meyari A. Dehnavi N.S. Zangi M. Comparative risk of cancer associated with SGLT inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2025 17 321 10.1186/s13098-025-01898-z 40770742 PMC12330067
54. García M. Arteche-Martinez U. Lertxundi U. Aguirre C. SGLT2 inhibitors and bladder cancer: Analysis of cases reported in the European pharmacovigilance database J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021 61 187 192 10.1002/jcph.1722 32827151
55. Dicembrini I. Nreu B. Mannucci E. Monami M. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019 21 1871 1877 10.1111/dom.13745 30972917
56. Spiazzi B.F. Naibo R.A. Wayerbacher L.F. Piccoli G.F. Farenzena L.P. Londero T.M. da Natividade G.R. Zoldan M. Degobi N.A.H. Niches M. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and cancer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2023 198 110621 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110621 36921905
57. Xu B. Kang B. Li S. Fan S. Zhou J. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2024 47 2421 2436 10.1007/s40618-024-02351-0 38530620
58. Gao F. Xu T. Zang F. Luo Y. Pan D. Cardiotoxicity of anticancer drugs: Molecular mechanisms, clinical management and innovative treatment Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2024 18 4089 4116 10.2147/DDDT.S469331 PMC11404500 39286288
59. Matsubara T. Yokoi H. Yamada H. Yanagita M. Nephrotoxicity associated with anticancer agents: Perspective on onconephrology from nephrologists Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023 28 625 636 10.1007/s10147-023-02307-z 36872414
60. Pan J. Garza F. Lyon A.R. Cardio-oncology: Rationale, aims and future directions Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care 2021 15 134 140 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000544 33605633
61. Lizakowski S. Dębska-Ślizień A. Kurnatowska I. Zaucha M.J. Matuszewski M. Naumnik B. Adamczak M. Chudek J. Durlik M. Ferrándiz-Pulido C. Nephro-oncology: Clinical and biochemical aspects of kidney disease and cancer Acta Biochim. Pol. 2023 70 347 361 10.18388/abp.2020_6588 37159995
62. Luo J. Hendryx M. Dong Y. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and non-small cell lung cancer survival Br. J. Cancer 2023 128 1541 1547 10.1038/s41416-023-02177-2 36765176 PMC10070339
63. Hendryx M. Dong Y. Ndeke J.M. Luo J. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor initiation and hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis PLoS ONE 2022 17 e0274519 10.1371/journal.pone.0274519 36094949 PMC9467321
64. Flausino L.E. Carrasco A.G.M. Furuya T.K. Tuan W.J. Chammas R. Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on survival in gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy: A real-world retrospective cohort BMC Cancer 2025 25 13966 10.1186/s12885-025-13966-8 PMC11938601 40133838
65. Mao X. Cheung K.S. Tan J.T. Mak L.Y. Lee C.H. Cheng H.M. Hui R.W.H. Chan E.W.Y. Yu P.L.H. Yuen M.F. Risk of colorectal cancer and cancer-related mortality in type 2 diabetes patients treated with metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, or their combination Cancer Commun. 2025 45 880 883 10.1002/cac2.70028 PMC12328085 40275591
66. Karimi M.A. Khadem R. Haraj A. Farahani M.A. Charehsaz Avari Firouzeh P. Azizinezhad A. Raki H.K. Belbasi M. Bafrani M.A. Deravi N. The impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on breast cancer and cancer-related mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials BMC Cancer 2025 25 14304 10.1186/s12885-025-14304-8 PMC12135325 40461957
67. Avula V. Sharma G. Kosiborod M.N. Vaduganathan M. Neilan T.G. Lopez T. Dent S. Baldassarre L. Scherrer-Crosbie M. Barac A. SGLT2 inhibitor use and risk of clinical events in patients with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction JACC Heart Fail. 2024 12 67 78 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.08.026 37897456
68. Abdel-Qadir H. Carrasco R. Austin P.C. Chen Y. Zhou L. Fang J. Su H.M.H. Lega I.C. Kaul P. Neilan T.G. Association of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with cardiovascular outcomes in anthracycline-treated patients with cancer JACC CardioOncol. 2023 5 318 328 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.03.011 37397088 PMC10308059
69. Gongora C.A. Drobni Z.D. Quinaglia Araujo Costa Silva T. Zafar A. Gong J. Zlotoff D.A. Gilman H.K. Hartmann S.E. Sama S. Nikolaidou S. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and cardiac outcomes among patients treated with anthracyclines JACC Heart Fail. 2022 10 559 567 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.03.006 35902159 PMC9638993
70. ClinicalTrials gov Expert Search: SGLT2 the Prevention of Cardiotoxicity 2025 Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/expert-search?term=SGLT2%20the%20Prevention%20of%20Cardiotoxicity (accessed on 6 October 2025)
71. Madonna R. De Caterina R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of vascular injury in diabetes—Part I: Pathways of vascular disease in diabetes Vascul. Pharmacol. 2011 54 68 74 10.1016/j.vph.2011.03.005 21453786
72. Griffin M. Rao V.S. Ivey-Miranda J. Fleming J. Mahoney D. Maulion C. Suda N. Siwakoti K. Ahmad T. Jacoby D. Empagliflozin in heart failure: Diuretic and cardiorenal effects Circulation 2020 142 1028 1039 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.045691 32410463 PMC7521417
73. Lambers Heerspink H.J. De Zeeuw D. Wie L. Leslie B. List J. Dapagliflozin, a glucose-regulating drug with diuretic properties in subjects with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2013 15 853 862 10.1111/dom.12127 23668478 PMC3906841
74. Cohen N.D. Gutman S.J. Briganti E.M. Taylor A.J. Effects of empagliflozin treatment on cardiac function and structure in patients with type 2 diabetes: A cardiac magnetic resonance study Intern. Med. J. 2019 49 1006 1010 10.1111/imj.14260 30784160
75. Chilton R. Tikkanen I. Cannon C.P. Crowe S. Woerle H.J. Broedl U.C. Johansen O.E. Effects of empagliflozin on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2015 17 1180 1193 10.1111/dom.12572 26343814 PMC5057299
76. Solini A. Giannini L. Seghieri M. Vitolo E. Taddei S. Ghiadoni L. Bruno R.M. Dapagliflozin acutely improves endothelial dysfunction, reduces aortic stiffness and renal resistive index in type 2 diabetic patients: A pilot study Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2017 16 138 10.1186/s12933-017-0621-8 29061124 PMC5654086
77. Mudaliar S. Alloju S. Henry R.R. Can a shift in fuel energetics explain the beneficial cardiorenal outcomes in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study? A unifying hypothesis Diabetes Care 2016 39 1115 1122 10.2337/dc16-0542 27289124
78. Ferrannini E. Baldi S. Frascerra S. Astiarraga B. Heise T. Bizzotto R. Mari A. Pieber T.R. Muscelli E. Shift to fatty substrate utilization in response to sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in subjects without diabetes and patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetes 2016 65 1190 1195 10.2337/db15-1356 26861783
79. Verma S. Mazer C.D. Yan A.T. Mason T. Garg V. Teoh H. Zuo F. Quan A. Farkouh M.E. Fitchett D.H. Effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular mass in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: The EMPA-HEART CardioLink-6 randomized clinical trial Circulation 2019 140 1693 1702 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042375 31434508
80. Haider A.W. Larson M.G. Benjamin E.J. Levy D. Increased left ventricular mass and hypertrophy are associated with increased risk for sudden death J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1998 32 1454 1459 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00407-0 9809962
81. Lee T.M. Chang N.C. Lin S.Z. Dapagliflozin, a selective SGLT2 inhibitor, attenuated cardiac fibrosis by regulating macrophage polarization via STAT3 signaling in infarcted rat hearts Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017 104 298 310 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.01.035 28132924
82. Li C. Zhang J. Xue M. Li X. Han F. Liu X. Xu L. Lu Y. Cheng Y. Li T. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin attenuates myocardial oxidative stress and fibrosis in diabetic mice heart Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019 18 15 10.1186/s12933-019-0816-2 30710997 PMC6359811
83. Lee H.C. Shiou Y.L. Jhuo S.J. Chang C.Y. Liu P.L. Jhuang W.J. Dai Z.K. Chen W.Y. Chen Y.F. Lee A.S. The sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin attenuates cardiac fibrosis and improves ventricular hemodynamics in hypertensive heart failure rats Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019 18 45 10.1186/s12933-019-0849-6 30935417 PMC6444638
84. Canter D. Kutikov A. Sirohi M. Street R. Viterbo R. Chen D.Y.T. Greenberg R.E. Uzzo R.G. Prevalence of baseline chronic kidney disease in patients presenting with solid renal tumors Urology 2011 77 781 785 10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.050 21316090 PMC3079293
85. Heerspink H.J.L. Stefánsson B.V. Correa-Rotter R. Chertow G.M. Greene T. Hou F.F. Mann J.F.E. McMurray J.J.V. Lindberg M. Rossing P. Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 383 1436 1446 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816 32970396
86. Yang Y. Li H.Y. Zhou Q. Peng Z.W. An X. Li W. Xiong L.P. Yu X.Q. Jiang W.Q. Mao H.P. Renal function and all-cause mortality risk among cancer patients Medicine 2016 95 e3728 10.1097/MD.0000000000003728 27196494 PMC4902436
87. Małyszko J. Kozłowska K. Kozłowski L. Małyszko J. Nephrotoxicity of anticancer treatment Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2017 32 924 936 10.1093/ndt/gfw338 28339935
88. Neugarten J. Golestaneh L. Blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI for assessment of renal oxygenation Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis. 2014 7 421 435 10.2147/IJNRD.S42924 25473304 PMC4247132
89. Cherney D.Z.I. Perkins B.A. Soleymanlou N. Maione M. Lai V. Lee A. Fagan N.M. Woerle H.J. Johansen O.E. Broedl U.C. Renal hemodynamic effect of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus Circulation 2014 129 587 597 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005081 24334175
90. Mazer C.D. Hare G.M.T. Connelly P.W. Gilbert R.E. Shehata N. Quan A. Teoh H. Leiter L.A. Zinman B. Jüni P. Effect of empagliflozin on erythropoietin levels, iron stores, and red blood cell morphology in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease Circulation 2020 141 704 707 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044235 31707794
91. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years N. Engl. J. Med. 2017 377 13 27 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362 28604169 PMC5477817
92. Singh G.M. Danaei G. Farzadfar F. Stevens G.A. Woodward M. Wormser D. Kaptoge S. Whitlock G. Qiao Q. Lewington S. The age-specific quantitative effects of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: A pooled analysis PLoS ONE 2013 8 e65174 10.1371/journal.pone.0065174 23935815 PMC3728292
93. Lauby-Secretan B. Scoccianti C. Loomis D. Grosse Y. Bianchini F. Straif K. Body fatness and cancer—Viewpoint of the IARC working group N. Engl. J. Med. 2016 375 794 798 10.1056/NEJMsr1606602 27557308 PMC6754861
94. Thanmai Nagasri M. Reddy P.S. Pasupuleti A. Akula S. Obesity and lifestyle changes: A global risk factor for cancer Obes. Diabetes Res. 2023 4 123 10.47275/2692-0964-123
95. De Pergola G. Silvestris F. Obesity as a major risk factor for cancer J. Obes. 2013 2013 291546 10.1155/2013/291546 24073332 PMC3773450
96. Basen-Engquist K. Chang M. Obesity and cancer risk: Recent review and evidence Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2011 13 71 76 10.1007/s11912-010-0139-7 21080117 PMC3786180
97. Azrad M. Demark-Wahnefried W. The association between adiposity and breast cancer recurrence and survival: A review of the recent literature Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2014 3 9 15 10.1007/s13668-013-0068-9 24533234 PMC3921906
98. McTiernan A. Obesity and cancer: The risks, science, and potential management strategies Oncology 2005 19 871 881 16053036
99. Ligibel J. Obesity and breast cancer Oncology 2011 25 994 1000 22106549
100. Park J. Morley T.S. Kim M. Clegg D.J. Scherer P.E. Obesity and cancer—Mechanisms underlying tumour progression and recurrence Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014 10 455 465 10.1038/nrendo.2014.94 24935119 PMC4374431
101. Stenlöf K. Cefalu W.T. Kim K.A. Alba M. Usiskin K. Tong C. Canovatchel W. Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2013 15 372 382 10.1111/dom.12054 23279307 PMC3593184
102. Cefalu W.T. Leiter L.A. Yoon K.H. Arias P. Niskanen L. Xie J. Balis D.A. Canovatchel W. Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52-week randomized, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial Lancet 2013 382 941 950 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60683-2 23850055
103. Bailey C.J. Gross J.L. Pieters A. Bastien A. List J.F. Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Lancet 2010 375 2223 2233 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60407-2 20609968
104. Ridderstråle M. Andersen K.R. Zeller C. Kim G. Woerle H.J. Broedl U.C. Comparison of empagliflozin and glimepiride as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 104-week randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 2 691 700 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70120-2 24948511
105. Tosaki T. Kamiya H. Himeno T. Kato Y. Kondo M. Toyota K. Nishida T. Shiroma M. Tsubonaka K. Asai H. Sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors reduce the abdominal visceral fat area and may influence the renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes Intern. Med. 2017 56 597 604 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7196 28321056 PMC5410466
106. Tchernof A. Després J.P. Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: An update Physiol. Rev. 2013 93 359 404 10.1152/physrev.00033.2011 23303913
107. Ayed K. Nabi L. Akrout R. Mrizak H. Gorrab A. Bacha D. Boussen H. Gati A. Obesity and cancer: Focus on leptin Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023 50 6177 6189 10.1007/s11033-023-08525-y 37227675
108. Vasan N. Baselga J. Hyman D.M. A view on drug resistance in cancer Nature 2019 575 299 309 10.1038/s41586-019-1730-1 31723286 PMC8008476
109. Wright E.M. SGLT2 and cancer Pflug. Arch. 2020 472 1407 1414 10.1007/s00424-020-02448-4 32820343 PMC7462911
110. Hung M.H. Chen Y.L. Chen L.J. Chu P.Y. Hsieh F.S. Tsai M.H. Shih C.T. Chao T.I. Huang C.Y. Chen K.F. Canagliflozin inhibits growth of hepatocellular carcinoma via blocking glucose-influx-induced β-catenin activation Cell Death Dis. 2019 10 420 10.1038/s41419-019-1646-6 31142735 PMC6541593
111. Zhou J. Zhu J. Yu S.J. Ma H.L. Chen J. Ding X.F. Chen G. Liang Y. Zhang Q. Sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 inhibition reduces glucose uptake to induce breast cancer cell growth arrest through AMPK/mTOR pathway Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020 132 110821 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110821 33068934
112. Nasiri A.R. Rodrigues M.R. Li Z. Leitner B.P. Perry R.J. SGLT2 inhibition slows tumor growth in mice by reversing hyperinsulinemia Cancer Metab. 2019 7 10 10.1186/s40170-019-0203-1 31867105 PMC6907191
113. Scafoglio C.R. Villegas B. Abdelhady G. Bailey S.T. Liu J. Shirali A.S. Wallace W.D. Magyar C.E. Grogan T.R. Elashoff D. Sodium–glucose transporter 2 is a diagnostic and therapeutic target for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma Sci. Transl. Med. 2018 10 eaat5933 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat5933 30429355 PMC6428683
114. Sabaa M. Sharawy M.H. El-Sherbiny M. Said E. Salem H.A. Ibrahim T.M. Canagliflozin interrupts mTOR-mediated inflammatory signaling and attenuates DMBA-induced mammary cell carcinoma in rats Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022 155 113675 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113675 36115110
115. Ali A. Mekhaeil B. Biziotis O.D. Tsakiridis E.E. Ahmadi E. Wu J. Wang S. Singh K. Menjolian G. Farrell T. The SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin suppresses growth and enhances prostate cancer response to radiotherapy Commun. Biol. 2023 6 919 10.1038/s42003-023-05289-w 37684337 PMC10491589
116. Abdelhamid A.M. Saber S. Youssef M.E. Gaafar A.G.A. Eissa H. Abd-Eldayem M.A. Alqarni M. Batiha G.E.S. Obaidullah A.J. Shahien M.A. Empagliflozin adjunct with metformin for the inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma progression: Emerging approach for new application Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022 145 112455 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112455 34844106
117. Nalla L.V. Khairnar A. Empagliflozin drives ferroptosis in anoikis-resistant cells by activating miR-128-3p–dependent pathway and inhibiting CD98hc in breast cancer Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2024 220 288 300 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.05.018 38734268
118. Murakami K. Sasaki Y. Asahiyama M. Yano W. Takizawa T. Kamiya W. Matsumura Y. Anai M. Osawa T. Fruchart J.C. Selective PPARα modulator pemafibrate and SGLT2 inhibitor tofogliflozin combination treatment improved histopathology in experimental mice model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis Cells 2022 11 720 10.3390/cells11040720 35203369 PMC8870369
119. Kato J. Shirakami Y. Ohnishi M. Mizutani T. Kubota M. Sakai H. Ibuka T. Tanaka T. Shimizu M. Suppressive effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor tofogliflozin on colorectal tumorigenesis in diabetic and obese mice Oncol. Rep. 2019 42 2797 2805 10.3892/or.2019.7357 31638239
120. Shiba K. Tsuchiya K. Komiya C. Miyachi Y. Mori K. Shimazu N. Yamaguchi S. Ogasawara N. Katoh M. Itoh M. Canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, attenuates the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in a mouse model of human NASH Sci. Rep. 2018 8 2362 10.1038/s41598-018-19658-7 29402900 PMC5799179
121. Fayed H.M. Asaad G.F. Elbaset M.A. Sharaf O.A. Mahmoud S.S. Amin M.M. El-Gendy Z.A. Ibrahim F.A. Abdelgayed S.S. Abdel-Rahman R.F. Therapeutic efficacy of canagliflozin against hepatocarcinogenesis induced by CDD/DEN/TAA in a rat model: Regulation of AMPK/HIF-1α/YAP-1/TAZ signaling pathways Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2025 398 16131 16148 10.1007/s00210-025-04098-8 40439888 PMC12552261
122. Ding L. Chen X. Zhang W. Dai X. Guo H. Pan X. Xu Y. Feng J. Yuan M. Gao X. Canagliflozin primes antitumor immunity by triggering PD-L1 degradation in endocytic recycling J. Clin. Investig. 2023 133 e154754 10.1172/JCI154754 36594471 PMC9797339
123. Hamaya S. Oura K. Morishita A. Masaki T. Cisplatin in liver cancer therapy Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 24 10858 10.3390/ijms241310858 37446035 PMC10341575
124. Xu X.F. Yang X.K. Song Y. Chen B.J. Yu X. Xu T. Chen Z.L. Dysregulation of non-coding RNAs mediates cisplatin resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma and therapeutic strategies Pharmacol. Res. 2022 176 105906 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105906 34543740
125. Zeng Y. Jiang H. Zhang X. Xu J. Wu X. Xu Q. Cai W. Ying H. Zhou R. Ding Y. Canagliflozin reduces chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma through PKM2–c-Myc complex-mediated glutamine starvation Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2023 208 571 586 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.09.006 37696420
126. Zhou J. Feng J. Wu Y. Dai H.Q. Zhu G.Z. Chen P.H. Wang L.M. Lu G. Liao X.W. Lu P.Z. Simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and glucose restriction inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo by impairing SIAH1-mediated mitophagy Exp. Mol. Med. 2022 54 2007 2021 10.1038/s12276-022-00878-x 36385558 PMC9723179
127. Akingbesote N.D. Norman A. Zhu W. Halberstam A.A. Zhang X. Foldi J. Lustberg M.B. Perry R.J. A precision medicine approach to metabolic therapy for breast cancer in mice Commun. Biol. 2022 5 478 10.1038/s42003-022-03422-9 35595952 PMC9122928
128. Nakachi S. Okamoto S. Tamaki K. Nomura I. Tomihama M. Nishi Y. Fukushima T. Tanaka Y. Morishima S. Imamura M. Impact of anti-diabetic sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on tumor growth of intractable hematological malignancy in humans Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022 149 112864 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112864 35367765
129. Xu C. Xu Z. Zhang Y. Evert M. Calvisi D.F. Chen X. β-Catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma J. Clin. Investig. 2022 132 e154515 10.1172/JCI154515 35166233 PMC8843739
130. Nakano D. Kawaguchi T. Iwamoto H. Hayakawa M. Koga H. Torimura T. Effects of canagliflozin on growth and metabolic reprogramming in hepatocellular carcinoma cells: Multi-omics analysis (IMPAQT) PLoS ONE 2020 15 e0232283 10.1371/journal.pone.0232283 32343721 PMC7188283
131. Faubert B. Boily G. Izreig S. Griss T. Samborska B. Dong Z. Dupuy F. Chambers C. Fuerth B.J. Viollet B. AMPK is a negative regulator of the Warburg effect and suppresses tumor growth in vivo Cell Metab. 2013 17 113 124 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.001 23274086 PMC3545102
132. Shoda K. Tsuji S. Nakamura S. Egashira Y. Enomoto Y. Nakayama N. Shimazawa M. Iwama T. Hara H. Canagliflozin inhibits glioblastoma growth and proliferation by activating AMPK Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023 43 879 892 10.1007/s10571-022-01221-8 35435536 PMC11415156
133. Xie Z. Wang F. Lin L. Duan S. Liu X. Li X. Li T. Xue M. Cheng Y. Ren H. An SGLT2 inhibitor modulates SHH expression by activating AMPK to inhibit migration and induce apoptosis of cervical carcinoma cells Cancer Lett. 2020 495 200 210 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.09.005 32931885
134. Jeng K.S. Chang C.F. Lin S.S. Sonic hedgehog signaling in organogenesis, tumors, and tumor microenvironments Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 758 10.3390/ijms21030758 31979397 PMC7037908
135. Okada J. Yamada E. Saito T. Yokoo H. Osaki A. Shimoda Y. Ozawa A. Nakajima Y. Pessin J.E. Okada S. Dapagliflozin inhibits cell adhesion to collagen I and IV and increases ectodomain proteolytic cleavage of DDR1 by increasing ADAM10 activity Molecules 2020 25 495 10.3390/molecules25030495 31979355 PMC7038111
136. Wu W. Zhang Z. Jing D. Huang X. Ren D. Shao Z. Zhang Z. SGLT2 inhibitor activates the STING/IRF3/IFN-β pathway and induces immune infiltration in osteosarcoma Cell Death Dis. 2022 13 523 10.1038/s41419-022-04980-w 35662245 PMC9166744
137. Kuang H. Liao L. Chen H. Kang Q. Shu X. Wang Y. Therapeutic effect of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on renal cell carcinoma Med. Sci. Monit. 2017 23 3737 3745 10.12659/MSM.902530 28763435 PMC5549715
Figures, Scheme and Tables







Table 1
The selected interaction of flozins with SGLT2.
| Flozin | Hydrogen-Bond/Polar Residues | Aromatic Residues | Hydrophobic Residues | Reference |
| Empagliflozin | Ser 78, Gly 79, Lys 154, Asp 158, Ser 393 | Tyr 290, Phe 98 | Leu 283, Val 95, His 80 | [ 28 ] |
| Dapagliflozin | Arg 46, Arg 49, Ser 78, Ser 393 | not specified | Ile 76, Met 216 | [ 28 ] |
| Canagliflozin | Asn 75, Ser 287, Lys 321, Gln 457 | Tyr 150, Tyr 290, Trp 289 | Val 95, His 80 | [ 28 ] |
| General C-glycosides | Glu 99, Leu 283, Lys 321, Asn 75, Ser 287, Gln 457 | Phe 98, Tyr 290, Trp 291 | Leu 84, Val 95 | [ 29 ] |
Table 2
Preclinical anticancer studies of SGLT2i on animal models.
Abbreviations: SGLT—sodium–glucose cotransporter; HCC—hepatocellular carcinoma; AFP—alpha-fetoprotein; AFU—alpha-L-fucosidase; CEA—carcinoembryonic antigen; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; ALT—alanine aminotransferase; γ-GT—gamma-glutamyl transferase; NASH—non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; SOD—superoxide dismutase; GSH—glutathione.
| Studies | SGLT2i Member | Cancer Type | Findings |
| Wright et al. (2020) [ 109 ] | Canagliflozin and Dapagliflozin | Pancreatic cancer, Prostate cancer | Canagliflozin ↓ tumour growth rate ~30%; dapagliflozin no effect; ↑ tumour necrosis 70–100% (both) |
| Hung et al. (2019) [ 110 ] | Canagliflozin | Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) | Inhibited lesion enlargement; prolonged survival; effect independent of blood glucose changes. |
| Zhou et al. (2020) [ 111 ] | Dapagliflozin | Breast cancer | Slowed tumour growth; Ki67 staining confirmed ↓ proliferative capacity of tumour cells. |
| Nasiri et al. (2019) [ 112 ] | Dapagliflozin | Breast cancer, Colorectal cancer | Reduced tumour growth rate; insulin-dependent effect |
| Scafoglio et al. (2018) [ 113 ] | Canagliflozin | Lung cancer | ↓ PET tracer uptake (glucose utilisation), delayed tumour onset, and markedly reduced total tumour burden. |
| Sabaa et al. (2022) [ 114 ] | Canagliflozin | Breast cancer | ↓ tumour weight and volume |
| Ali et al. (2023) [ 115 ] | Canagliflozin | Prostate cancer | Slowed tumour growth, without toxicity; sensitisation to radiotherapy |
| Abdelhamid et al. (2022) [ 116 ] | Empagliflozin | HCC | Regression of malignant changes; ↓ AST/ALT/γ-GT and AFP (tumour activity marker). |
| Nalla et al. (2024) [ 117 ] | Empagliflozin | Breast cancer | ↓ lung bioluminescence and the number of lung nodules; lowered thoracic/peritoneal tumour burden; delayed metastatic development. |
| Murakami et al. (2022) [ 118 ] | Tofogliflozin | HCC | Markedly ↓ the number of liver tumours and ↑ the survival of treated mice. |
| Kato et al. (2019) [ 119 ] | Tofogliflozin | Colorectal cancer | ↓ number of pre-neoplastic lesions, presumably via attenuation of chronic inflammation. |
| Shiba et al. (2018) [ 120 ] | Canagliflozin | HCC | Antisteatotic effects; attenuation of progression from NASH to HCC. |
| Fayed et al. (2025) [ 121 ] | Canagliflozin | HCC | ↓ tumour progression markers: AFP, AFU and CEA, levels; ↓ oxidative stress marker: MDA levels; ↑ antioxidant markers: SOD and GSH levels. |
| Ding et al. (2023) [ 122 ] | Canagliflozin | Lung cancer | ↓ tumour growth by engaging the immune system and decreasing tumour immunosuppressive activity; ↑ inflammatory response in the tumour microenvironment |
Table 3
Molecular mechanisms of SGLT2i.
Abbreviations: HCC—hepatocellular carcinoma; SGLT2 –sodium-glucose cotransporter 2; GLUT—glucose transporters; PP2A—protein phosphatase 2A; OXPHOS—oxidative phosphorylation; ATP—adenosine triphosphate; AMPK—AMP-activated protein kinase; SHH—sonic hedgehog; miR-128-3p—microRNA-128-3p; CD98hc—cluster of differentiation 98 heavy chain; mTORC1—mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1; HIF-1α—hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha; MAPK—mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK—extracellular signal-regulated kinase; ADAM10—a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 10; DDR1—discoidin domain receptor 1; AKT—protein kinase B; STING—stimulator of interferon genes; IRF3—interferon regulatory factor 3; IFN-β—interferon beta; WNT/β-catenin—Wingless-integrated/β-catenin; ROS—reactive oxygen species; CD4 + and CD8 + T cells—cluster of differentiation 4 and 8 positive T cells.
| Studies | SGLT2i Member | Cancer Type | Mechanism | Biological Effect |
| Nakachi et al. (2025) [ 128 ] | Luseogliflozin and Tofogliflozin | Leukaemia | Glucose intake inhibition through SGLT2 blockade | Suppression of the proliferation and colony formation of cells |
| Hung et al. (2019) [ 110 ] | Canagliflozin | HCC | Nonselective inhibition of >1 GLUT isoform; ↓ glucose influx → PP2A inhibition → proteasomal degradation of β-catenin; attenuation of WNT/β-catenin signalling | Reduced proliferation and colony formation, slowed xenograft tumour growth |
| Nakano et al. (2020) [ 130 ] | Canagliflozin | HCC | Suppression of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS); ↓ intracellular ATP | G2/M arrest; secondary apoptosis; ↓ proliferation |
| Xie et al. (2020) [ 133 ] | Empagliflozin | Cervical cancer | AMPK activation (↑ phosphorylation) → downregulation of SHH | ↓ proliferation and migration |
| Nalla et al. (2024) [ 117 ] | Empagliflozin | Breast cancer | miR-128-3p ↑ → CD98hc ↓ → sensitization to ferroptosis | ↓ cell viability, ↑ ferroptotic markers (lipid ROS) |
| Ali et al. (2023) [ 115 ] | Canagliflozin | Prostate cancer | Inhibition of mitochondrial complex I → AMPK activation → inhibition of mTORC1 and HIF-1α; transcriptional reprogramming (↓ poor-prognosis genes, MAPK/ERK) | ↓ proliferation and survival |
| Okada et al. (2020) [ 135 ] | Dapagliflozin | Colorectal cancer | ↑ ADAM10 activity → proteolytic cleavage/shedding of DDR1 ectodomain → ↓ DDR1 signalling → loss of adhesion to collagen I/IV | Detachment and loss of adhesion; reduced cell viability |
| Wu et al. (2022) [ 136 ] | Canagliflozin | Osteosarcoma | Inhibition of AKT phosphorylation → activation of STING/IRF3/IFN-β innate immunity pathway; induction of immune infiltration | ↓ tumour growth; ↑ infiltration of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells; activation of innate immune response; synergistic antitumour effect with STING agonist |
| Kuang et al. (2017) [ 137 ] | Dapagliflozin | Renal cell carcinoma | ↓ glucose uptake; downregulation of SGLT2; alteration in cell cycle | ↓ proliferation and viability; cell cycle arrest (G1), increased apoptosis |