Interleukin-6 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Dualistic Point of View.

1. Introduction

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays a crucial role in the development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver cancer. IL-6 is produced by various cell types, including immune cells, stromal cells, and cancer cells themselves.

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), IL-6 exhibits a dual role, with its effects being contingent upon its context. While IL-6 predominantly promotes tumor growth and advancement, it also exhibits a paradoxical impact in specific scenarios, showcasing the contrasting influences of this cytokine. This dichotomy often corresponds to different aspects of the tumor microenvironment and the tumor’s developmental stage. On the one hand, IL-6 is instrumental in bolstering the proliferation and survival of HCC cells, achieved through the activation of the JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway. This activation leads to the elevation of genes responsible for cell proliferation and the inhibition of apoptosis, thus contributing to unregulated tumor cell expansion. When it comes to angiogenesis, IL-6 propels the development of fresh blood vessels within the tumor (angiogenesis), furnishing crucial nutrients and oxygen to sustain tumor growth and enlargement. Moreover, IL-6 is correlated with heightened metastatic potential in HCC. It facilitates the process of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), empowering cancer cells to acquire invasive attributes and disseminate to distant organs [ 1 , 2 ].

On the other hand, in certain situations, IL-6 can stimulate an anti-tumor immune response. It can promote the activation and recruitment of immune cells such as cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells, which play a crucial role in recognizing and eliminating cancer cells. IL-6 is involved in immune surveillance, which is the process of the immune system recognizing and controlling cancer cells. It can trigger the immune system to detect and eliminate pre-cancerous cells [ 3 , 4 ].

The dual role of IL-6 in HCC can be partly explained by the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment and the complex interplay between cancer cells, immune cells, and stromal cells. Additionally, the stage of the tumor, the level of IL-6 expression, and the presence of other cytokines and signaling molecules can influence its effects. Therefore, the goal of this review is to highlight the importance of custom therapeutic strategies for HCC patients, taking into consideration the dynamic nature of the interactions between Il-6 and the tumor microenvironment.

2. Interleukin-6—In the Maze of Physiological and Pathological

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a 184 amino acid glycosylated protein formed by four-helix bundles (A-D) arranged as a ribbon-shaped molecule. A diverse range of cellular sources (monocytes, fibroblasts, tumor, endothelial, mesenchymal, and T-cells) synthesizes this multifunctional cytokine [ 5 , 6 ]. Initially identified as a Bcell stimulatory factor, it sizes 21–26 kDa and partakes in the interleukin-6 cytokine family along with interleukin-11 (IL-11), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), oncostatin M (OSM), cardiotrophin-like cytokine (CLC), cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1), novel neutrophin-1 (NNT-1), and interleukin-27 (IL-27). IL-6 distinguishes itself from the other family members by its unique signaling mechanisms, which will subsequently be elucidated in this paper. Physiological blood levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) typically range from 1 to 5 pg/mL but can increase several thousand-fold during inflammatory states. In lethal septic conditions, IL-6 levels can reach up to several mg/mL [ 3 , 5 , 7 , 8 ].

IL-6 is involved in inflammation, immune response, hematopoiesis, metabolism, embryonic development, and memory consolidation by controlling its targeted cells’ differentiation, proliferation, migration, and apoptosis. It stimulates B and T cells, induces hepatic acute phase proteins (C reactive protein, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen, hepcidin) and targets bone marrow and synovial and dermal fibroblasts [ 3 , 8 , 9 ]. Consequently, dysregulations involving the participation of IL-6 hold substantial clinical significance.

Regarding extracellular signaling pathways, IL-6 can exert classic signaling ( Figure 1 A) or trans-signaling ( Figure 1 B). The classical pathway implies the binding of IL-6 with the membrane-bound IL-6 receptor (mIL-6R), a ligand-binding glycoprotein called CD126. mIL-6R is a transmembrane α-chain (80 kDa) consisting of three domains (D1, D2, and D3). The Ig domain, referred to as D1, is connected to the domain responsible for binding cytokines (CBD). Utilizing the CBD, IL-6 attaches to the co-receptor glycoprotein 130 (gp130), forming a hexameric arrangement [ 8 ]. The following point is crucial to highlight: mIL-6R lacks signal-transduction capacity, whereas gp-130 possesses signal-transduction capabilities [ 10 ]. This matter signifies that only gp130 can trigger internal signaling sequences. IL-6 itself does not exhibit any binding affinity toward gp130; therefore, mIL-6R is imperative for the initial binding of IL-6 and the subsequent activation of gp130. Neither the cytoplasmic nor the transmembrane segments of IL-6R hold signaling competence [ 5 ]. mIL-6R is expressed on a few cells (hepatocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, T-cells), while gp130 is expressed on all human cells. This hexameric complex formed by IL-6, mIL-6R, and gp-130 activates Janus kinase (JAK), activating different signaling routes. One signaling route represents the self-tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK, which then induces the dimerization of signal transducer and transcription-3 (STAT3). In an alternate signaling pathway, JAK triggers the Ras/Raf pathway, leading to an elevated level of hyperphosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK). This results in an augmentation of serine and threonine kinase activity within MAPK. Additionally, JAK can phosphorylate and activate phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K). Subsequently, PI3K phosphorylates specific phosphatidylinositides, converting them into phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3). PIP3 serves as the activator for the protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt pathway, contributing to activating the nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB). Consequently, this classical signaling pathway governs essential physiological functions, including initiating acute phase proteins (APP) within the liver, impacting neutrophils, and influencing acquired immunity. Nevertheless, it also plays a role in pathological conditions such as cancer by activating the STAT3, MAPK, and PKB/Akt pathways, and NF-kB [ 6 , 9 , 11 , 12 ]. This particular way of signaling is also associated with the anti-inflammatory roles that IL-6 holds.

The conventional IL-6R signaling pathway exhibits limitations due to its reliance on the presence of mIL-6R to confer responsiveness to IL-6 within a cell. This is where the concept of trans-IL-6 signaling comes into play. The soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), which ranges from 50 to 55 kDa, constitutes the extracellular component of the transmembrane IL-6R. It arises either through proteolytic cleavage or by translating an alternatively spliced mRNA, wherein the exon responsible for encoding the transmembrane segment is omitted [ 7 ]. The latter accounts only for a minor proportion (1–10%) of sIL-6R, the vast majority (90–99%) being produced by proteolytic cleavage of the IL-6R by two Zn2+-dependent proteases: ADAM10 and ADAM17, both members of the A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase (ADAM) family. Consequently, sIL-6R gains the ability to freely traverse the organism, dispersing it into various bodily fluids where it can engage its ligand, IL-6. Within the serum of healthy individuals, a concentration of approximately 25–50 ng/mL of sIL-6R is typically detected. Upon interaction with gp130, the complex formed by IL-6 and sIL-6R kickstarts identical intracellular signaling pathways, as outlined earlier. The difference lies in their effect on cells that express gp130 but lack IL-6R, effectively stimulating this subset of cells [ 6 , 9 ]. Trans IL-6 signaling is linked with pro-inflammatory outcomes.

In a pathological context, IL-6 plays a significant role in cancer development. Elevated levels of IL-6 have been observed in various tumor types, including colon, ovarian, pancreatic, lung, hepatocellular, breast, prostate, and multiple myeloma [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. The three intracellular signaling pathways (JAK/STAT3, Ras/Raf/MAPK, PI3K/PKB/Akt) initiated by IL-6 cause cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and metastasis [ 21 ]. IL-6 regulates CD4+ T-cells by inhibiting regulatory T cell (T reg ) differentiation and stimulating the differentiation of T helper 17 cells (Th17, pro-inflammatory cells that produce IL-17).

These disruptions lead to an immune system imbalance, resulting in the secretion of IL-17, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α). Through activating JAK, IL-6 also triggers the gene expression of factors such as Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, Survivin, Mcl-1, and XIAP, all associated with apoptotic cell processes [ 22 ]. The PI3K/Akt pathway also contributes to NF-kB activation, as mentioned before. This promotes enhanced cell survival and governs tumor invasion. Furthermore, IL-6 exerts its effects on synovial fibroblasts and lymphoid follicles, inducing elevated production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). It can result in heightened vascular permeability, leading to vascular leakage and joint destruction due to pannus formation. Collectively, these factors, including the excessive expression of IL-17, IL-6, TNF-α, altered gene expression, and vascular leakage, contribute to a cancer-favorable environment [ 6 ].

3. HCC—New Pieces to the Puzzle

Hepatocellular carcinoma stands as the fourth leading contributor to cancer-related fatalities globally. It constitutes 90% of primary liver cancers, and the mortality rates consistently rise by 2 to 3% annually. This escalation is primarily attributed to frequently delayed diagnosis and the absence of curative treatments for the advanced stages of the disease [ 23 ].

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, excessive alcohol consumption (which, although not mutagenic, heightens cirrhosis risk), and the ingestion of aflatoxin B1 are key factors contributing to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ( Figure 2 ) [ 24 ]. Moreover, the increasing incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma is becoming progressively more associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD encompasses a range of chronic liver conditions characterized by the accumulation of triglycerides within hepatocytes, exceeding 5% of their cytoplasmic content. Importantly, this occurs in the absence of significant alcohol consumption and is notably correlated with metabolic disorders such as obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) is increasing, and the mortality from HCC is predicted to reach 1 million deaths annually by 2030 [ 25 , 26 , 27 ]. In addition, smoking tobacco increases HCC by accelerating liver fibrosis, and long-term usage is strongly associated with it [ 28 , 29 ] (55% increased risk for HCC was demonstrated in a cohort study, the “Liver Cancer Pooling Project” [ 30 ]). Smoking brings hepatocarcinogens (e.g., 4-aminobiphenyl and acetylaminofluorene) into the body, which increases the production of proinflammatory cytokines and induces oxidative stress, triggering lipid peroxidation [ 31 ].

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) traditionally involves surveillance through techniques such as ultrasonography (US) and serological measurements of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). In the case of lesions smaller than 1 cm, regular screening is advised, typically involving follow-up US examinations at intervals of 3 to 6 months, as outlined in diverse guidelines [ 32 , 33 ]. In lesions ≥1 cm, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and other cross-sectional imaging techniques provide a definitive diagnosis. Moreover, although many scientists are now seeking new biomarkers due to the controversy regarding the utility of AFP, it remains the most universally used biomarker for HCC [ 34 ]. It has been confirmed that a persistently increased AFP level, which has been proven to be associated with an aggressive histological morphology (vascular invasion (poorly differentiated) and satellitosis), is a hazardous factor for HCC [ 35 ].

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) presents in three distinct glycoforms, each exhibiting varying affinities for binding to the lectin Lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA). These glycoforms are classified as AFP-L1 (non-binding fraction), AFP-L2 (weak binding fraction), and AFP-L3 (binding fraction). Notably, AFP-L1 experiences elevation in cases of chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis, whereas AFP-L3 demonstrates specific elevation solely in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). AFP-L3 is exclusively produced by cancer cells, rendering it a more targeted biomarker for HCC [ 36 , 37 ]. However, AFP-L3 is not applicable for HCC diagnosis when total AFP levels are below 20 ng/mL as it remains undetectable in such cases. When the total AFP concentration is less than 20 ng/mL, AFP-L3 is irrelevant for HCC detection as it remains untraceable [ 38 ].

Des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (DCP) is an abnormal prothrombin molecule that is increased in HCC. DCP loses its normal prothrombin function but may take on an essential role in promoting malignant proliferation in HCC, and many studies have shown that the level of serum DCP in patients with benign and malignant liver diseases deviates significantly from physiological [ 39 ]. Glypican-3 (GPC3) belongs to the glypican family of heparan sulfate proteoglycans and is involved in cell proliferation, survival, and tumor suppression. Usually, it is absent in healthy and non-malignant hepatocytes but appears to function differently in diverse cancers. GPC3 is downregulated in breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and lung adenocarcinoma, and it is upregulated in HCC [ 40 , 41 ]. A study by Nakatsura et al. [ 42 ] found that GPC3 was detected in 40% of HCC patients and 33% of HCC patients seronegative for both AFP and DCP.

Osteopontin (OPN), also known as the transformation-related protein phosphatase, is an integrin-binding glycophosphoprotein overexpressed in many different types of malignancies, including lung, breast, and colon cancer. The protein has been found to play a role in many physiological cellular functions, including migration, invasion, and metastasis [ 43 ]. One of its more critical roles has been suggested to be in the metastatic potential of various cancers [ 44 ]. Commonly, OPN is expressed in bile duct epithelium, stellate cells, and Kupffer cells but not in hepatocytes [ 45 ]. However, elevated expression of serum OPN has been reported in HCC patients compared to normal liver patients or those with liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis [ 46 , 47 ]. For OPN, the AUC for discriminating between early-stage HCC (BCLC stage A) and cirrhosis was 0.73 [ 38 ].

Golgi protein-73 (GP73) is a type II Golgi-specific membrane protein typically expressed in the epithelial cells of various human tissue types but not hepatocytes. However, GP73 is detected in the serum of patients with liver disease, particularly HCC [ 48 ]. A case-control study by Mao Y et al. [ 49 ] demonstrated that serum GP73 in patients with HCC was significantly elevated than compared to those in healthy adults and hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers without hepatic disease. The combination of GP73 and AFP increased the sensitivity and specificity to 89.2% (95% CI: 86.7–91.5%) and 85.2% (95% CI: 83.4–86.4%), respectively, with an AUC of 0.96 [ 50 ] ( Figure 3 ).

Early and accurate diagnosis of HCC patients is critical for patient prognosis. Several studies have successfully identified promising biomarkers for the diagnosis of HCC. However, current studies suggest that a single biomarker alone may not have the best sensitivity and specificity for detecting HCC, especially for detecting early-stage HCC [ 53 ]. Biomarker combinations can further increase the predictive performance for HCC detection [ 54 ]. Moreover, it has been reported that combining several biomarkers improves the early diagnosis rate [ 50 ]. Adding clinical variables (such as age and gender) into the model, it is worth noting that the GALAD score, which is the combination of clinical factors (gender, age) and biomarkers (AFP, AFP-L3, and Des-carboxyprothrombin), has been validated to improve the performance of discerning between HCC and cirrhosis [ 55 ].

A study by Gosain et al. aimed to establish the role of IL-6 as a prognostic biomarker in patients with both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary cancer. The authors assessed how IL-6 impacts two crucial factors affecting quality of life: pain scores and performance status.

In order to minimize potential confounding variables, the study researchers selected a control group comprising 91 individuals. These controls were carefully matched in terms of age, gender, and BMI, as these factors are widely recognized for their substantial impact on IL-6 levels [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. The research team collected blood samples from the patients, and serum specimens were determined using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. IL-6 levels were notably higher in hepatobiliary cancer patients when compared to the healthy control group.

In conclusion, elevated levels of IL-6 were closely associated with poorer prognoses, increased pain scores, and deteriorated performance statuses in the patients [ 62 ].

A retrospective study by Yang et al. aimed to assess the utility of IL-6 promoter methylation levels as a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker for liver cancer. The study involved 165 patients diagnosed with HCC associated with hepatitis B virus, 198 patients with chronic hepatitis B, and 31 healthy individuals serving as controls. The research employed Methylight methodology to detect methylation levels in the IL-6 promoter region within peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) [ 63 ].

In conclusion, the study revealed that in HBV-associated HCC, the methylation levels of the IL-6 promoter were notably lower than those observed in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Conversely, the IL-6 mRNA levels were significantly elevated in HBV-associated HCC compared to both CHB patients and healthy individuals [ 63 ].

4. Is There a Role of IL-6 in HCC Biology?

IL-6 plays diverse roles, acting as a hepatocyte stimulatory factor to trigger acute phase reactions. However, its presence also heightens susceptibility to various human ailments, including autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammatory conditions, and multiple forms of cancer. IL-6 has been identified as a cytokine that is significantly abundant within the tumor microenvironment (TME) across a spectrum of cancer types. These include head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), pancreatic cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and melanoma, as substantiated by previous studies [ 18 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]. Generally, the overexpression of IL-6 is associated with poor prognosis and a low survival rate in patients with breast cancer [ 74 ]. Beyond its recognized role in tumorigenesis, IL-6 also plays a pivotal role in orchestrating the intricate sequence of events that precedes the establishment of secondary tumors, commonly referred to as metastasis [ 75 ]. Notably, elevated serum IL-6 levels have been detected in patients with primary liver cancer.

IL-6 engages three significant pathways (STAT3, MAPK, and PI3K). Among these, the STAT3 pathway holds particular significance, being classified as an oncogene and consistently activated in multiple human malignancies. Ordinarily, IL-6 functions to confer hepatoprotection against apoptosis stemming from viral infections or exposure to chemicals, primarily through the STAT3 pathway [ 76 , 77 , 78 ].

The roles of IL-6 in HCC are emphasized by the effects of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway [ 79 ]. The hyperactivation of STAT3 holds a significant role in the formation of inflammatory tumors within the microenvironment, facilitating both uncontrolled proliferation of cancer cells and metastasis [ 80 ]. In particular, the genes responsible for promoting cancer cell proliferation, including Ras, Src, and cyclin D1, serve as direct targets of STAT3 [ 81 ].

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) promote tumor progression in liver tissue microenvironments by releasing IL-6, which, in turn, activates the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway in nearby HCC stem cells [ 82 ]. A study by Zheng et al. [ 83 ] sheds light on the hyperactivation of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway in HCC cells which could upregulate the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), thus prompting the conversion of normal liver fibroblasts (LFs) into carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), ultimately driving the initiation of liver cancer [ 2 ].

The induction of apoptosis in HCC cells primarily hinges on two mechanisms: the upregulation of anti-apoptotic factors and the promotion of survival signals. Following STAT3 activation mediated by IL-6, there is an important increase in the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-xL, Bcl-2, survivin, and P53, among others. This upregulation plays a crucial role in safeguarding HCC cells against apoptosis [ 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 ]. In particular, Bcl-2 stands out as a vital protein in fostering the survival of tumor cells.

The critical determinant of apoptosis is the delicate balance between pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins. Activation of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway has the potential to shift this balance by increasing the proportion of pro-apoptotic factors relative to anti-apoptotic factors, and heightened IL-6 levels are likely to contribute to this modification [ 87 ].

Additionally, STAT3 phosphorylation can directly bind to the promoter region of the survivin gene, leading to an upregulation of survivin expression and thereby promoting the survival of tumor cells. On the other hand, inhibiting STAT3 activity can result in the downregulation of survivin gene expression, facilitating the induction of apoptosis in liver cancer cells [ 88 ]. These findings demonstrate that the activation of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway has the capacity to boost the expression of survival-related proteins, which, in turn, act to impede apoptosis in HCC cells.

A crucial role in tumor invasion and metastasis is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes vascular endothelial cell growth and tumor neoangiogenesis. The expression of VEGF is more elevated in liver tumor tissue than in cirrhosis and normal liver tissue [ 89 ]. A significant factor which can induce the secretion and expression of VEGF in tumor tissue is hypoxia through hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). IL-6 binds with IL-6R to induce the activation of STAT3 and activated STAT3 binds to the promoter region of the VEGF gene to increase transcription, promoting the tumor angiogenesis.

HCCs that are associated with ASH (alcoholic steatohepatitis) or NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) have a similar molecular key: the IL-6/JAK/STAT signaling pathway [ 90 ] activated by the interleukin-6 family of cytokines. This family’s hallmark is using the signal-transducing β-receptor gp130 [ 91 ].

Estrogen inhibits the release of IL-6 from Kupffer cells, reducing the risk of HCC for women. A significant source of IL-6 appears to be the tumor-associated macrophages [ 92 ], although HCC cells could secrete IL-6 in a YAP (yes-associated protein)-dependent manner [ 93 ]. YAP have been identified as the transcriptional co-activator of the Hippo pathway, overexpressed in 62% of HCC patients as an oncoprotein to modulate liver size and tumorigenesis [ 94 , 95 , 96 ]. Hippo signaling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway that controls organ size by regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, and stem cell self-renewal. To conclude, dysregulation of the Hippo pathway contributes to cancer development.

Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the process of cellular malignant transformation. Persistent and unresolved inflammation within the liver has been demonstrated to stimulate the development of hepatocarcinogenesis [ 97 ]. Changes in the cellular microenvironment lead to tumoral shifts over time [ 98 ]. Several pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF, IL-1β, and anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as TGF-α and TGF-β, and also different transcription factors, such as STAT-3 and NF-κβ, together with their signaling pathways, are involved in modulating the development of HCC [ 97 , 98 , 99 ]. These cytokines are produced by immune cells such as Th1 and Th2 and are triggered by different danger-associated molecular patterns secreted by injured hepatocytes such as high-mobility group box one and S100, IL-1α [ 98 , 100 ]. Reactive oxygen species, such as peroxides, superoxide, hydroxyl radicals, and nitrogen compounds derived from nitric oxide radicals, are generated as reactions to various stressors and inflammations linked to cancer [ 101 ] and contribute to the progression of HCC [ 98 , 101 , 102 ]. It has been shown that the early stages of HCC present an altered immune response regarding stress-related factors, such as the nitrosative stress profile in monocytes and glutathione levels in monocytes and lymphocytes [ 101 ] ( Figure 4 ).

5. The Two Faces of IL-6 in HCC Therapies

IL-6 has a dual role in the immune response. It has been described as anti-inflammatory in some cases, whereas in others, it promotes inflammation and immunity. Initially, it has been viewed as a factor of malignancy, with the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling path having effects such as anti-apoptosis, angiogenesis, and proliferation [ 2 ], while more recent findings have shown that IL-6 also has beneficial roles regarding anti-tumor immunity.

IL-6 is synthesized by various immune cells, including macrophages, T cells, B cells, and dendritic cells. Despite its initial identification as a B cell growth factor, IL-6 delivers survival and proliferation cues to a wide array of leukocytes. Nevertheless, the signaling of IL-6 is tightly controlled, primarily due to the restricted presence of the IL-6Rα subunit on specific cell types [ 103 ]. As an illustration, IL-6 exhibits elevated expression in naive T cells, effectively enhancing T cell survival and minimizing apoptosis. This effect is achieved by downregulating Fas and FasL, which are transmembrane proteins associated with cell death [ 104 ]. Moreover, IL-6 overexpression in mice has been correlated with significantly increased numbers of peripheral T cells, which still had a naive phenotype and did not express memory or activation markers, supporting the idea that the enhanced numbers were due to the increased survival of T cells and not the expansion of activated T cells [ 105 ].

Recent studies have revealed that IL-6 also influences the enhancement of adhesive characteristics in blood vessels. This impact extends to structures such as high endothelial venules, which facilitate the entry of naive and memory T cells into lymph nodes and the endothelium of blood vessels within tumors. This augmentation of endothelial adhesiveness results in heightened immune cell trafficking, thereby contributing to the immune system’s ability to target cancer cells within the tumor microenvironment [ 103 ]. Another advantage of elevated IL-6 levels is its capacity to stimulate the proliferation and regeneration of liver progenitor cells, also known as oval cells. This ability can potentially facilitate liver mass and function restoration [ 106 ]. IL-6 initiates the production of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) [ 107 ], which, in turn, triggers the expression of SNHG12 and regulates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, thus promoting hepatocyte proliferation and regeneration [ 108 , 109 ]. Moreover, in an IL-6 dependent mechanism, HGF facilitates the phosphorylation of STAT3, leading to the activation of this pathway [ 109 ]. This has dual consequences: it regulates liver cells proliferation with the help of cyclin D1/p21, while also preventing cell death by elevating the levels of different proteins involved in this process, i.e., FLIP, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Ref1, and MnSOD [ 110 ].

Moreover, IL-6 and another pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-1β, have been shown to induce fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) expression in both normal and HCC cells. When IL-1β was involved, FGF-2 stimulation led to increased levels of the membrane-bound major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA)—which is an NK cell activation molecule—as well as decreased levels of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I—which is an NK cell inhibitor. Thus, IL-6 indirectly led, through FGF-2 stimulation, to increased NK sensitivity against the cancer cells, showing another possible new role for IL-6 in innate immunity against HCC [ 111 ].

The influence of IL-6 on T cells carries significant implications. Research has demonstrated that effector T cells play a crucial role not only in innate anti-tumor immunity but also in the effectiveness of conventional cancer treatments such as radiation therapy [ 112 , 113 ]. Another study aimed to counteract the negative impact of regulatory T cells in patients treated with therapeutic cytokine-induced killer cells (CIK cells) by adding IL-6 to the CIK cells culture medium. There was a decrease in the number of T reg /CD4(+) and T reg /CD3(+) along with an increase in the cytotoxicity of the CIK cells against HCC in vitro, suggesting the potential use of IL-6 in improving cancer immunotherapy [ 114 ].

The equilibrium shifts in favor of elevated IL-6 levels in the context of thermal HCC ablation. During ablation, tissue surrounding the tumor site experiences heat-induced damage, leading to the release of neoantigens into the bloodstream, which subsequently triggers a systemic response [ 115 , 116 ]. Additional exploration is necessary in order to uncover whether the cytokines influenced by MWA (microwave ablation) treatment might have an impact on cancer progression, whether that impact be beneficial or detrimental.

Although IL-6 plays a beneficial role in the body’s protective response against tumor cells, clinical studies have demonstrated a substantial decline in the efficacy of therapeutic drugs due to their interaction with IL-6. A study by Wong V et al. [ 117 ] found that patients with HBV and high serum IL-6 levels had an increased risk of developing HCC.

Likewise, a study conducted by Yu Li and colleagues proposes that IL-6 could potentially serve as a biomarker indicative of response to sorafenib (PubChem CID:216239) treatment among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib is a standard therapeutic agent frequently employed in HCC treatment. This research article posits that IL-6 might contribute to the development of resistance against sorafenib therapy [ 118 ].

Furthermore, IL-6’s interaction with immunotherapy has come to the forefront. The combination therapy of atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) has emerged as a primary approach for advanced HCC [ 119 , 120 ]. However, approximately 20% of patients fail to respond. In a recent study, simultaneous measurement of 34 plasma proteins was conducted, revealing that elevated plasma IL-6 levels served as a notable predictor of non-responsiveness to Atezo/Bev treatment. This finding was corroborated by the observation that the IL-6-high group exhibited significantly shorter progression-free survival and overall survival durations compared to the IL-6-low group [ 121 ].

Considering the significant involvement of IL-6 in developing and advancing HCC, reducing IL-6 levels has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy. A number of preclinical and clinical trials have examined the use of IL-6 inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies and small molecule inhibitors, in the treatment of HCC. Thus, a study by Johnson D et al. [ 122 ] found that an antibody capable of neutralizing IL-6 enhanced the anti-tumor effects of sorafenib. In this study, the authors discovered that sorafenib’s anti-tumor effects were increased in a mouse model of HCC by targeting the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway with an IL-6 neutralizing antibody, implying that IL-6 may contribute to HCC patients’ resistance to sorafenib therapy. Similarly, a clinical trial by Abou-Alfa et al. [ 123 ] investigated the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib (PubChem CID:25102847) in HCC patients previously receiving sorafenib treatment. The authors also explored the potential effect of IL-6 biomarkers with respect to cabozantinib treatment. According to the study’s findings, high levels of IL-6 were linked to a poor response to cabozantinib therapy. Notably, compared to patients with lower baseline levels of IL-6, those with greater baseline levels of IL-6 had an overall lower response rate and shorter progression-free survival. Collectively, the research suggests that IL-6 could potentially serve as a biomarker indicating the response to cabozantinib treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a comprehensive understanding of IL-6 and other potential biomarkers in the context of cabozantinib therapy for HCC demands further extensive research. Even though IL-6 can be harnessed to manipulate the tumor microenvironment and enhance the body’s immune response, its suppressive effects on standard systemic treatments significantly overshadow the potential benefits of elevated IL-6 levels.

While it primarily promotes tumor growth and progression, IL-6 also exhibits paradoxical effects under specific contexts, often linked to the tumor microenvironment and stage. It stimulates an anti-tumor immune response by activating immune cells, aiding immune surveillance, and targeting pre-cancerous cells. This dichotomy underscores the intricate dynamics of IL-6 in HCC and how it can influence different liver cancer therapies illustrated in Figure 5 .

Recent research has highlighted the increasing importance of the intestinal microbiota in the development of liver disease, indicating that manipulating the bacterial population in the gut could be useful in the prevention and management of HCC [ 124 ]. The connection between IL-6 and the intestinal microbiota holds a crucial role in the development of HCC. A bidirectional link exists between the liver and the gut, as they communicate via the biliary tract, portal vein, and systemic circulation, forming the gut–liver axis [ 125 ]. Dysbiosis can potentially disrupt this system, resulting in heightened intestinal permeability. Consequently, bacterial components and detrimental agents are released within the gut–liver axis, triggering an immune response that initiates inflammation and prompts an elevated secretion of IL-6, fostering the progression of HCC [ 126 ]. Moreover, elevated IL-6 levels aggravate both intestinal permeability and microbiota changes [ 127 ], creating a harmful cycle that contributes to the progression of HCC, as illustrated in Figure 6 .

Cancer stem cells (CSCs), also known as tumor-initiating cells, play a crucial role in tumor initiation, growth, recurrence, metastasis, and resistance to cancer therapies. Studies focused on human HCC observed that within mice HCC, there were cells expressing stem cell markers that surprisingly exhibited a loss of TBRII (TGF-β-receptor type II) [ 128 ]. TBRII plays a crucial role in mediating cellular responses to TGF-β, maintaining normal cellular homeostasis and tissue development [ 129 ]. Aberrant TGF-β signaling can promote tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis in HCC. The tumors’ expression analysis showed a prominent activation of genes related to the IL-6 signaling pathway, including IL-6 and STAT3. This observation suggests that hepatocellular carcinoma might develop from a stem cell that has transformed due to IL-6 stimulation while concurrently deactivating its TGF-β signaling [ 128 ]. One study regarding the resection of HCC revealed that CSCs increased immediately after surgical manipulation, and the laparoscopy group released fewer tumor cells into the blood stream. Post-surgery, both IL-6 and IL-8 levels rose, yet the laparoscopic group showed notably smaller mean increases in serum IL-6 and IL-8 levels compared to the open surgery group. This reduction was linked to decreased cancer progression [ 130 ]. A separate study also highlighted the adverse consequences of heightened IL-6 levels. The expression of both IL-6 and IL-6R within the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) microenvironment was found to contribute to the recurrence of tumors following surgery. This observation suggests that these molecules could serve as potential indicators of recurrence, and might be viable targets for therapeutic intervention, aiming to improve the long-term survival of patients [ 131 ].

Additional research endeavors have focused on investigating the influence of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) on the advancement of HCC [ 132 ]. The findings revealed that CAFs play a significant role by secreting elevated levels of IL-6, promoting cancer growth and progression [ 83 ]. Consequent activation of Notch signaling through STAT3 Tyr705 phosphorylation promotes stem cell-like characteristics in HCC cells [ 133 , 134 ]. Thus, the size of xenografted liver tumors was significantly larger in nude mice that received a combination of HCC cells and CAFs than those injected with HCC cells alone [ 132 ]. These findings indicate that the secretion of IL-6 by CAFs enhances STAT3/Notch signaling, thereby promoting stem cell-like properties in HCC cells.

6. IL-6 Targets

Looking towards bioactive compounds derived from plants that target IL-6 in HCC, including Curcuma phaeocaulis [ 135 ], Curcuma aromatica , Polygonum cuspidatum [ 136 ], and Silybum marianum [ 137 ], it has been shown that curcumin inhibits IL-6-induced JAK/STAT3 signaling cascades through negative feedback, suppressing the development of inflammation in HCC [ 135 ]. Even though their molecular mechanism is not fully understood, both silymarin and resveratrol are also used as alternative treatments for their anti-HCC-associated effects, possibly through the induction of cell cycle arrest [ 137 ] and the installation of apoptotic cell death [ 136 ].

Therapies directed at targeting interleukin-6 have been observed to enhance outcomes across various types of cancer. Monoclonal antibody (mAbs) use has been suggested to have a positive effect against the development of ovarian cancer [ 138 ], renal cancer [ 139 ], multiple myeloma [ 140 ], prostate cancer [ 141 ], non-small cell lung cancer [ 142 ], human oral small squamous cell carcinoma [ 143 ], and cancer cachexia [ 144 ]. Bevacizumab is a humanized recombinant anti-VEGF-A mAbs. It has been shown to have positive effects on the development of HCC in preclinical studies on mice models [ 145 ]. In the clinical setting, it has been evaluated in the treatment of HCC both as a single agent [ 146 ], and in combination with immune check point inhibitors such as Atezolizumab [ 119 , 120 ]. Tocilizumab (PubChem SID:472385906) is an anti-IL-6R mAbs approved by the FDA for human use. Its effects have been studied on tumor cell cultures and in mice models. It has been found to inhibit the progression of HCC by reducing the development of cancer stem cells mediated by tumor-associated macrophages [ 92 ]. Soluble gp130 (sgp130) is a protein that inhibits the trans signaling pathway of IL-6. In vitro examinations demonstrated that recombinant human sgp130 reduces induced HCC in mice and inhibits the growth and metastases of human HCC xenografts in mice models [ 147 ].

Evaluation of small-molecule agents that inhibit IL-6 and its associated signaling pathway has been undertaken, exploring a potential approach in cancer treatment [ 148 , 149 ]. Azaspirane (Antiprimod) (PubChem CID:129869) is a JAK2 and JAK3 inhibitor [ 150 ], i.e., of enzymes which are involved in the IL-6 signaling pathway [ 149 ]. It showed promising results in the in vitro progression of leukemia cells [ 150 ]. Antiprimod has been shown to selectively induce apoptosis and inhibit the proliferation of HCC cells that express HBVs or HCVs. This has been demonstrated on HCC culture cells. The mechanisms by which it affects HCC are the deactivation of the Akt and STAT3 signaling pathways. It has also been hypothesized that the accumulation of viral proteins could sensitize cells to antiprimod [ 151 , 152 ].

More recent research has underlined the possible use of newly synthesized azaspirane derivatives, of which 2-(1-(4-(2-cyanophenyl)1-benzyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-5-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-1-oxa-3-azaspiro(5,5) undecane (CIMO) (PubChem CID:14257) was the most promising; CIMO inhibits constitutive and IL-6-induced activation of STAT3, and its inhibitory effect is specific to Tyr-705 in HCC cells, a site of STAT3 phosphorylation, making it a possible treatment for HCC [ 153 ].

Another small-molecule compound that inhibits JAKs 1 and 2 is ruxolitinib (PubChem CID:25126798), an FDA-approved drug for treating myelofibrosis (MF) [ 154 ]. Ruxolitinib has been shown to have significant anti-proliferative effects on HCC cells, albeit at much higher doses than those approved for MF. It effectively inhibits the downstream targets of JAKs, reducing HCC cell proliferation and colony formation. However, it did not present any in vitro hepatotoxicity, which is a potential risk to be investigated in a clinical setting [ 155 ]. Moreover, ruxolitinib has shown positive effects on HCC metastasis progression [ 156 ] but has been found to have a higher affinity for specific JAK mutations, such as JAK1-S703I [ 157 ]. Furthermore, it was noted that this compound could reduce the progression of hepatic fibrosis and even reverse it [ 158 ].

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, interleukin-6 assumes a pivotal role in hepatocellular carcinoma, the predominant liver cancer type. Its generation spans across immune, stromal, and cancer cells. Given HCC’s multifaceted nature, effective therapeutic approaches must encompass a range of cellular and molecular targets. This variability in HCC composition implies that elevated IL-6 levels can impact therapies diversely. While IL-6-targeted treatments offer potential, their effectiveness may be augmented by combining them with other modalities, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or agents targeting angiogenic pathways.

Acknowledgments

“Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ph.D. study Iuliana Nenu—4322/01.10.2018.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.N. and G.A.F.; methodology, I.N. and T.M.T.; software, I.T., A.Ț. and D.A.B.; validation, Z.S. and G.A.F.; formal analysis, Z.S. and G.A.F.; investigation, I.N. and T.M.T.; resources, A.Ț., D.A.B. and Ș.E.T.; data curation, I.T.; writing—original draft preparation, I.N., T.M.T., I.T., A.Ț., D.A.B. and Ș.E.T.; writing—review and editing, G.A.F.; visualization, I.T.; supervision, Z.S. and G.A.F.; project administration, Z.S. and G.A.F.; funding acquisition, I.N. and G.A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Kotsari M. Dimopoulou V. Koskinas J. Armakolas A. Immune System and Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): New Insights into HCC Progression Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 24 11471 10.3390/ijms241411471 37511228 PMC10380581

2. Xu J. Lin H. Wu G. Zhu M. Li M. IL-6/STAT3 Is a Promising Therapeutic Target for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Front. Oncol. 2021 11 760971 10.3389/fonc.2021.760971 34976809 PMC8714735

3. Tanaka T. Narazaki M. Kishimoto T. IL-6 in Inflammation, Immunity, and Disease Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014 6 a016295 10.1101/cshperspect.a016295 25190079 PMC4176007

4. Mikucki M.E. Fisher D.T. Ku A.W. Appenheimer M.M. Muhitch J.B. Evans S.S. Preconditioning Thermal Therapy: Flipping the Switch on IL-6 for Anti-Tumour Immunity Int. J. Hyperth. 2013 29 464 473 10.3109/02656736.2013.807440 PMC3893705 23862980

5. Schaper F. Rose-John S. Interleukin-6: Biology, Signaling and Strategies of Blockade Cytokine Growth Factor. Rev. 2015 26 475 487 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.004 26189695

6. Kaur S. Bansal Y. Kumar R. Bansal G. A Panoramic Review of IL-6: Structure, Pathophysiological Roles and Inhibitors Bioorg Med. Chem. 2020 28 115327 10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115327 31992476

7. Tanaka T. Kishimoto T. The Biology and Medical Implications of Interleukin-6 Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014 2 288 294 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0022 24764575

8. Rose-John S. Interleukin-6 Family Cytokines Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018 10 a028415 10.1101/cshperspect.a028415 28620096 PMC5793756

9. Scheller J. Garbers C. Rose-John S. Interleukin-6: From Basic Biology to Selective Blockade of pro-Inflammatory Activities Semin. Immunol. 2014 26 2 12 10.1016/j.smim.2013.11.002 24325804

10. Rose-John S. Jenkins B.J. Garbers C. Moll J.M. Scheller J. Targeting IL-6 Trans-Signalling: Past, Present and Future Prospects Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023 23 666 681 10.1038/s41577-023-00856-y 37069261 PMC10108826

11. Schumacher N. Meyer D. Mauermann A. von der Heyde J. Wolf J. Schwarz J. Knittler K. Murphy G. Michalek M. Garbers C. Shedding of Endogenous Interleukin-6 Receptor (IL-6R) Is Governed by A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase (ADAM) Proteases While a Full-Length IL-6R Isoform Localizes to Circulating Microvesicles J. Biol. Chem. 2015 290 26059 26071 10.1074/jbc.M115.649509 26359498 PMC4646259

12. Baran P. Hansen S. Waetzig G.H. Akbarzadeh M. Lamertz L. Huber H.J. Ahmadian M.R. Moll J.M. Scheller J. The Balance of Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-6·soluble IL-6 Receptor (SIL-6R), and IL-6·sIL-6R·sgp130 Complexes Allows Simultaneous Classic and Trans-Signaling J. Biol. Chem. 2018 293 6762 6775 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001163 29559558 PMC5936821

13. Kohsari M. Khadem-Ansari M.-H. Rasmi Y. Sayyadi H. Serum Levels of Interleukin-8 and Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor in Patients with Stage-I Multiple Myeloma: A Case-Control Study Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2020 21 127 132 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.1.127 31983174 PMC7294003

14. Culig Z. Puhr M. Interleukin-6: A Multifunctional Targetable Cytokine in Human Prostate Cancer Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2012 360 52 58 10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.033 21664423 PMC3409376

15. Dethlefsen C. Højfeldt G. Hojman P. The Role of Intratumoral and Systemic IL-6 in Breast Cancer Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013 138 657 664 10.1007/s10549-013-2488-z 23532539

16. Bergmann J. Müller M. Baumann N. Reichert M. Heneweer C. Bolik J. Lücke K. Gruber S. Carambia A. Boretius S. IL-6 Trans-signaling Is Essential for the Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mice Hepatology 2017 65 89 103 10.1002/hep.28874 27770462

17. Saad M.I. Alhayyani S. McLeod L. Yu L. Alanazi M. Deswaerte V. Tang K. Jarde T. Smith J.A. Prodanovic Z. ADAM 17 selectively activates the IL-6 trans-signaling/ERK MAPK axis in KRAS-addicted lung cancer EMBO Mol. Med. 2019 11 e9976 10.15252/emmm.201809976 30833304 PMC6460353

18. Lesina M. Kurkowski M.U. Ludes K. Rose-John S. Treiber M. Klöppel G. Yoshimura A. Reindl W. Sipos B. Akira S. Stat3/Socs3 Activation by IL-6 Transsignaling Promotes Progression of Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Development of Pancreatic Cancer Cancer Cell 2011 19 456 469 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.03.009 21481788

19. Greenhill C.J. Rose-John S. Lissilaa R. Ferlin W. Ernst M. Hertzog P.J. Mansell A. Jenkins B.J. IL-6 Trans -Signaling Modulates TLR4-Dependent Inflammatory Responses via STAT3 J. Immunol. 2011 186 1199 1208 10.4049/jimmunol.1002971 21148800

20. Nagasaki T. Hara M. Nakanishi H. Takahashi H. Sato M. Takeyama H. Interleukin-6 Released by Colon Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Is Critical for Tumour Angiogenesis: Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Antibody Suppressed Angiogenesis and Inhibited Tumour–Stroma Interaction Br. J. Cancer 2014 110 469 478 10.1038/bjc.2013.748 24346288 PMC3899773

21. Johnston P.A. Grandis J.R. STAT3 SIGNALING: Anticancer Strategies and Challenges Mol. Interv. 2011 11 18 26 10.1124/mi.11.1.4 21441118 PMC3063716

22. WANG X. LIU B. QU B. XING H. GAO S. YIN J. WANG X. CHENG Y. Silencing STAT3 May Inhibit Cell Growth through Regulating Signaling Pathway, Telomerase, Cell Cycle, Apoptosis and Angiogenesis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Potential Uses for Gene Therapy Neoplasma 2011 58 158 164 10.4149/neo_2011_02_158 21275467

23. Wang W. Wei C. Advances in the Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Genes. Dis. 2020 7 308 319 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.01.014 32884985 PMC7452544

24. Guichard C. Amaddeo G. Imbeaud S. Ladeiro Y. Pelletier L. Ben Maad I. Calderaro J. Bioulac-Sage P. Letexier M. Degos F. Integrated Analysis of Somatic Mutations and Focal Copy-Number Changes Identifies Key Genes and Pathways in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Nat. Genet. 2012 44 694 698 10.1038/ng.2256 22561517 PMC3819251

25. Akinyemiju T. Abera S. Ahmed M. Alam N. Alemayohu M.A. Allen C. Al-Raddadi R. Alvis-Guzman N. Amoako Y. Artaman A. The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level JAMA Oncol. 2017 3 1683 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055 28983565 PMC5824275

26. Anstee Q.M. Reeves H.L. Kotsiliti E. Govaere O. Heikenwalder M. From NASH to HCC: Current Concepts and Future Challenges Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019 16 411 428 10.1038/s41575-019-0145-7 31028350

27. Kim E. Viatour P. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Old Friends and New Tricks Exp. Mol. Med. 2020 52 1898 1907 10.1038/s12276-020-00527-1 33268834 PMC8080814

28. Gallaway M.S. Henley S.J. Steele C.B. Momin B. Thomas C.C. Jamal A. Trivers K.F. Singh S.D. Stewart S.L. Surveillance for Cancers Associated with Tobacco Use—United States, 2010–2014 MMWR Surveill. Summ. 2018 67 1 42 10.15585/mmwr.ss6712a1 30383737 PMC6220819

29. Zein C.O. Unalp A. Colvin R. Liu Y.-C. McCullough A.J. Smoking and Severity of Hepatic Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease J. Hepatol. 2011 54 753 759 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.040 21126792 PMC3060962

30. Petrick J.L. Campbell P.T. Koshiol J. Thistle J.E. Andreotti G. Beane-Freeman L.E. Buring J.E. Chan A.T. Chong D.Q. Doody M.M. Tobacco, Alcohol Use and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: The Liver Cancer Pooling Project Br. J. Cancer 2018 118 1005 1012 10.1038/s41416-018-0007-z 29520041 PMC5931109

31. Bataller R. Time to Ban Smoking in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases Hepatology 2006 44 1394 1396 10.1002/hep.21484 17133465

32. Benson A.B. D’Angelica M.I. Abbott D.E. Abrams T.A. Alberts S.R. Anaya D.A. Are C. Brown D.B. Chang D.T. Covey A.M. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 1.2017 J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2017 15 563 573 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0059 28476736 PMC5557008

33. Heimbach J.K. Kulik L.M. Finn R.S. Sirlin C.B. Abecassis M.M. Roberts L.R. Zhu A.X. Murad M.H. Marrero J.A. AASLD Guidelines for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hepatology 2018 67 358 380 10.1002/hep.29086 28130846

34. Yıldırım H.Ç. Kavgaci G. Chalabiyev E. Dizdar O. Advances in the Early Detection of Hepatobiliary Cancers Cancers 2023 15 3880 10.3390/cancers15153880 37568696 PMC10416925

35. Galle P.R. Foerster F. Kudo M. Chan S.L. Llovet J.M. Qin S. Schelman W.R. Chintharlapalli S. Abada P.B. Sherman M. Biology and Significance of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Int. 2019 39 2214 2229 10.1111/liv.14223 31436873

36. Spangenberg H.C. Thimme R. Blum H.E. Serum Markers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Semin. Liver Dis. 2006 26 385 390 10.1055/s-2006-951606 17051452

37. Sato Y. Nakata K. Kato Y. Shima M. Ishii N. Koji T. Taketa K. Endo Y. Nagataki S. Early Recognition of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Altered Profiles of Alpha-Fetoprotein N. Engl. J. Med. 1993 328 1802 1806 10.1056/NEJM199306243282502 7684823

38. Tsuchiya N. Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma World J. Gastroenterol. 2015 21 10573 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10573 26457017 PMC4588079

39. Volk M.L. Hernandez J.C. Su G.L. Lok A.S. Marrero J.A. Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma May Impair the Performance of Biomarkers: A Comparison of AFP, DCP, and AFP-L31 Cancer Biomark. 2007 3 79 87 10.3233/CBM-2007-3202 17522429

40. Sung Y.K. Hwang S.Y. Park M.K. Farooq M. Han I.S. Bae H.I. Kim J.-C. Kim M. Glypican-3 Is Overexpressed in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cancer Sci. 2003 94 259 262 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01430.x 12824919 PMC11160150

41. Filmus J. Capurro M. The Role of Glypican-3 in the Regulation of Body Size and Cancer Cell Cycle 2008 7 2787 2790 10.4161/cc.7.18.6672 18787398

42. Nakatsura T. Yoshitake Y. Senju S. Monji M. Komori H. Motomura Y. Hosaka S. Beppu T. Ishiko T. Kamohara H. Glypican-3, Overexpressed Specifically in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Is a Novel Tumor Marker Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003 306 16 25 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00908-2 12788060

43. Shevde L. Das S. Clark D. Samant R. Osteopontin: An Effector and an Effect of Tumor Metastasis Curr. Mol. Med. 2010 10 71 81 10.2174/156652410791065381 20205680 PMC6869338

44. Rangaswami H. Bulbule A. Kundu G.C. Osteopontin: Role in Cell Signaling and Cancer Progression Trends Cell Biol. 2006 16 79 87 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.12.005 16406521

45. Kawashima R. Mochida S. Matsui A. YouLuTuZ Y. Ishikawa K. Toshima K. Yamanobe F. Inao M. Ikeda H. Ohno A. Expression of Osteopontin in Kupffer Cells and Hepatic Macrophages and Stellate Cells in Rat Liver after Carbon Tetrachloride Intoxication: A Possible Factor for Macrophage Migration into Hepatic Necrotic Areas Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999 256 527 531 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0372 10080931

46. Shang S. Plymoth A. Ge S. Feng Z. Rosen H.R. Sangrajrang S. Hainaut P. Marrero J.A. Beretta L. Identification of Osteopontin as a Novel Marker for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hepatology 2012 55 483 490 10.1002/hep.24703 21953299 PMC3914762

47. Abu El Makarem M.A. Abdel-Aleem A. Ali A. Saber R. Shatat M. Rahem D.A. Sayed D. Diagnostic Significance of Plasma Osteopontin in Hepatitis C Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ann. Hepatol. 2011 10 296 305 10.1016/S1665-2681(19)31541-8 21677331

48. Kladney R.D. Cui X. Bulla G.A. Brunt E.M. Fimmel C.J. Expression of GP73, a Resident Golgi Membrane Protein, in Viral and Nonviral Liver Disease Hepatology 2002 35 1431 1440 10.1053/jhep.2002.32525 12029628

49. Mao Y. Yang H. Xu H. Lu X. Sang X. Du S. Zhao H. Chen W. Xu Y. Chi T. Golgi Protein 73 (GOLPH2) Is a Valuable Serum Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Gut 2010 59 1687 1693 10.1136/gut.2010.214916 20876776

50. Xu W.-J. Guo B.-L. Han Y.-G. Shi L. Ma W.-S. Diagnostic Value of Alpha-Fetoprotein-L3 and Golgi Protein 73 in Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Low AFP Levels Tumor Biol. 2014 35 12069 12074 10.1007/s13277-014-2506-8 25209179

51. Marrero J.A. Feng Z. Wang Y. Nguyen M.H. Befeler A.S. Roberts L.R. Reddy K.R. Harnois D. Llovet J.M. Normolle D. α-Fetoprotein, Des-γ Carboxyprothrombin, and Lectin-Bound α-Fetoprotein in Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Gastroenterology 2009 137 110 118 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.005 19362088 PMC2704256

52. Jia X. Liu J. Gao Y. Huang Y. Du Z. Diagnosis Accuracy of Serum Glypican-3 in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Arch. Med. Res. 2014 45 580 588 10.1016/j.arcmed.2014.11.002 25446613

53. Liu X.-N. Cui D.-N. Li Y.-F. Liu Y.-H. Liu G. Liu L. Multiple “Omics” Data-Based Biomarker Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis World J. Gastroenterol. 2019 25 4199 4212 10.3748/wjg.v25.i30.4199 31435173 PMC6700689

54. Tayob N. Kanwal F. Alsarraj A. Hernaez R. El-Serag H.B. The Performance of AFP, AFP-3, DCP as Biomarkers for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): A Phase 3 Biomarker Study in the United States Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023 21 415 423.e4 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.047 35124267 PMC9346092

55. Johnson P.J. Pirrie S.J. Cox T.F. Berhane S. Teng M. Palmer D. Morse J. Hull D. Patman G. Kagebayashi C. The Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Prospectively Developed and Validated Model Based on Serological Biomarkers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2014 23 144 153 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0870 24220911

56. Harris T.B. Ferrucci L. Tracy R.P. Corti M.C. Wacholder S. Ettinger W.H. Heimovitz H. Cohen H.J. Wallace R. Associations of Elevated Interleukin-6 and C-Reactive Protein Levels with Mortality in the Elderly∗∗Access the “Journal Club” Discussion of This Paper at Http:/Www.Elsevier.Com/Locate/Ajmselect/ Am. J. Med. 1999 106 506 512 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00066-2 10335721

57. Mohamed-Ali V. Goodrick S. Rawesh A. Katz D.R. Miles J.M. Yudkin J.S. Klein S. Coppack S.W. Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Releases Interleukin-6, but Not Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha, In Vivo J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997 82 4196 4200 10.1210/jcem.82.12.4450 9398739

58. Kiecolt-Glaser J.K. Preacher K.J. MacCallum R.C. Atkinson C. Malarkey W.B. Glaser R. Chronic Stress and Age-Related Increases in the Proinflammatory Cytokine IL-6 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003 100 9090 9095 10.1073/pnas.1531903100 12840146 PMC166443

59. Naugler W.E. Sakurai T. Kim S. Maeda S. Kim K. Elsharkawy A.M. Karin M. Gender Disparity in Liver Cancer Due to Sex Differences in MyD88-Dependent IL-6 Production Science (1979) 2007 317 121 124 10.1126/science.1140485 17615358

60. Kern P.A. Ranganathan S. Li C. Wood L. Ranganathan G. Adipose Tissue Tumor Necrosis Factor and Interleukin-6 Expression in Human Obesity and Insulin Resistance Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 2001 280 E745 E751 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.5.E745 11287357

61. Nakagawa H. Maeda S. Yoshida H. Tateishi R. Masuzaki R. Ohki T. Hayakawa Y. Kinoshita H. Yamakado M. Kato N. Serum IL-6 Levels and the Risk for Hepatocarcinogenesis in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients: An Analysis Based on Gender Differences Int. J. Cancer 2009 125 2264 2269 10.1002/ijc.24720 19585572

62. Gosain R. Anwar S. Miller A. Iyer R. Mukherjee S. Interleukin-6 as a Biomarker in Patients with Hepatobiliary Cancers J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2019 10 537 545 10.21037/jgo.2019.01.09 31183205 PMC6534725

63. Yang J.-R. Wang J. Li H.-M. Gao S. Fan Y.-C. Wang K. IL-6 Promoter Hypomethylation Acts As a Diagnostic Biomarker in Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Front. Oncol. 2022 12 746643 10.3389/fonc.2022.746643 35359408 PMC8962649

64. Jobe N.P. Rösel D. Dvořánková B. Kodet O. Lacina L. Mateu R. Smetana K. Brábek J. Simultaneous Blocking of IL-6 and IL-8 Is Sufficient to Fully Inhibit CAF-Induced Human Melanoma Cell Invasiveness Histochem. Cell Biol. 2016 146 205 217 10.1007/s00418-016-1433-8 27102177

65. Li L. Dragulev B. Zigrino P. Mauch C. Fox J.W. The Invasive Potential of Human Melanoma Cell Lines Correlates with Their Ability to Alter Fibroblast Gene Expression In Vitro and the Stromal Microenvironment In Vivo Int. J. Cancer 2009 125 1796 1804 10.1002/ijc.24463 19569239

66. Browning L. Patel M. Bring Horvath E. Tawara K. Jorcyk C.L. IL-6 and Ovarian Cancer: Inflammatory Cytokines in Promotion of Metastasis Cancer Manag. Res. 2018 10 6685 6693 10.2147/CMAR.S179189 30584363 PMC6287645

67. Szulc-Kielbik I. Kielbik M. Nowak M. Klink M. The Implication of IL-6 in the Invasiveness and Chemoresistance of Ovarian Cancer Cells. Systematic Review of Its Potential Role as a Biomarker in Ovarian Cancer Patients Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Rev. Cancer 2021 1876 188639 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188639 34695534

68. Abulaiti A. Shintani Y. Funaki S. Nakagiri T. Inoue M. Sawabata N. Minami M. Okumura M. Interaction between Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells and Fibroblasts via Enhancement of TGF-β Signaling by IL-6 Lung Cancer 2013 82 204 213 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.08.008 24011634

69. Mace T.A. Ameen Z. Collins A. Wojcik S. Mair M. Young G.S. Fuchs J.R. Eubank T.D. Frankel W.L. Bekaii-Saab T. Pancreatic Cancer-Associated Stellate Cells Promote Differentiation of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in a STAT3-Dependent Manner Cancer Res. 2013 73 3007 3018 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4601 23514705 PMC3785672

70. Gasche J.A. Hoffmann J. Boland C.R. Goel A. Interleukin-6 Promotes Tumorigenesis by Altering DNA Methylation in Oral Cancer Cells Int. J. Cancer 2011 129 1053 1063 10.1002/ijc.25764 21710491 PMC3110561

71. Kim S. Gwak H. Kim H.S. Kim B. Dhanasekaran D.N. Song Y.S. Malignant Ascites Enhances Migratory and Invasive Properties of Ovarian Cancer Cells with Membrane Bound IL-6R In Vitro Oncotarget 2016 7 83148 83159 10.18632/oncotarget.13074 27825119 PMC5347759

72. Krishnamurthy S. Warner K.A. Dong Z. Imai A. Nör C. Ward B.B. Helman J.I. Taichman R.S. Bellile E.L. McCauley L.K. Endothelial Interleukin-6 Defines the Tumorigenic Potential of Primary Human Cancer Stem Cells Stem Cells 2014 32 2845 2857 10.1002/stem.1793 25078284 PMC4198458

73. Stanam A. Love-Homan L. Joseph T.S. Espinosa-Cotton M. Simons A.L. Upregulated Interleukin-6 Expression Contributes to Erlotinib Resistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Mol. Oncol. 2015 9 1371 1383 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.03.008 25888065 PMC4523436

74. Masjedi A. Hashemi V. Hojjat-Farsangi M. Ghalamfarsa G. Azizi G. Yousefi M. Jadidi-Niaragh F. The Significant Role of Interleukin-6 and Its Signaling Pathway in the Immunopathogenesis and Treatment of Breast Cancer Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018 108 1415 1424 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.177 30372844

75. Rašková M. Lacina L. Kejík Z. Venhauerová A. Skaličková M. Kolář M. Jakubek M. Rosel D. Smetana K. Brábek J. The Role of IL-6 in Cancer Cell Invasiveness and Metastasis—Overview and Therapeutic Opportunities Cells 2022 11 3698 10.3390/cells11223698 36429126 PMC9688109

76. Haga S. Terui K. Zhang H.Q. Enosawa S. Ogawa W. Inoue H. Okuyama T. Takeda K. Akira S. Ogino T. Stat3 Protects against Fas-Induced Liver Injury by Redox-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms J. Clin. Investig. 2003 112 989 998 10.1172/JCI200317970 14523036 PMC198521

77. Galun E. Zeira E. Pappo O. Peters M. Rose-John S. Liver Regeneration Induced by a Designer Human IL-6/SIL-6R Fusion Protein Reverses Severe Hepatocellular Injury FASEB J. 2000 14 1979 1987 10.1096/fj.99-0913com 11023982

78. Kovalovich K. DeAngelis R.A. Li W. Furth E.E. Ciliberto G. Taub R. Increased Toxin-Induced Liver Injury and Fibrosis in Interleukin-6-Deficient Mice Hepatology 2000 31 149 159 10.1002/hep.510310123 10613740

79. Makino Y. Hikita H. Kato S. Sugiyama M. Shigekawa M. Sakamoto T. Sasaki Y. Murai K. Sakane S. Kodama T. STAT3 Is Activated by CTGF-Mediated Tumor-Stroma Cross Talk to Promote HCC Progression Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023 15 99 119 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.09.006 36210625 PMC9672888

80. Bournazou E. Bromberg J. Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment JAKSTAT 2013 2 e23828 10.4161/jkst.23828 24058812 PMC3710325

81. Du P. Cao H. Wu H.-R. Zhu B.-S. Wang H.-W. Gu C.-W. Xing C.-G. Chen W. Blocking Bcl-2 Leads to Autophagy Activation and Cell Death of the HEPG2 Liver Cancer Cell Line Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013 14 5849 5854 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.10.5849 24289588

82. Ghoshal S. Fuchs B.C. Tanabe K.K. STAT3 Is a Key Transcriptional Regulator of Cancer Stem Cell Marker CD133 in HCC Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 2016 5 201 203 10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.02 27275460 PMC4876240

83. Zheng X. Xu M. Yao B. Wang C. Jia Y. Liu Q. IL-6/STAT3 Axis Initiated CAFs via up-Regulating TIMP-1 Which Was Attenuated by Acetylation of STAT3 Induced by PCAF in HCC Microenvironment Cell Signal 2016 28 1314 1324 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.06.009 27297362

84. Kim B. Park B. Saffron Carotenoids Inhibit STAT3 Activation and Promote Apoptotic Progression in IL-6-Stimulated Liver Cancer Cells Oncol. Rep. 2018 39 1883 1891 10.3892/or.2018.6232 29393468

85. Zhao H. Guo Y. Li S. Han R. Ying J. Zhu H. Wang Y. Yin L. Han Y. Sun L. A Novel Anti-Cancer Agent Icaritin Suppresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma Initiation and Malignant Growth through the IL-6/Jak2/Stat3 Pathway Oncotarget 2015 6 31927 31943 10.18632/oncotarget.5578 26376676 PMC4741651

86. Subramaniam A. Shanmugam M.K. Ong T.H. Li F. Perumal E. Chen L. Vali S. Abbasi T. Kapoor S. Ahn K.S. Emodin Inhibits Growth and Induces Apoptosis in an Orthotopic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model by Blocking Activation of STAT3 Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013 170 807 821 10.1111/bph.12302 23848338 PMC3799595

87. Siddiqui W.A. Ahad A. Ahsan H. The Mystery of BCL2 Family: Bcl-2 Proteins and Apoptosis: An Update Arch. Toxicol. 2015 89 289 317 10.1007/s00204-014-1448-7 25618543

88. He G. Karin M. NF-ΚB and STAT3—Key Players in Liver Inflammation and Cancer Cell Res. 2011 21 159 168 10.1038/cr.2010.183 21187858 PMC3193410

89. Yamada S. Okumura N. Wei L. Fuchs B.C. Fujii T. Sugimoto H. Nomoto S. Takeda S. Tanabe K.K. Kodera Y. Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Is Associated with Shorter Disease-Free Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014 21 3882 3890 10.1245/s10434-014-3779-2 24833103

90. Calderaro J. Couchy G. Imbeaud S. Amaddeo G. Letouzé E. Blanc J.-F. Laurent C. Hajji Y. Azoulay D. Bioulac-Sage P. Histological Subtypes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Are Related to Gene Mutations and Molecular Tumour Classification J. Hepatol. 2017 67 727 738 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.05.014 28532995

91. Lokau J. Schoeder V. Haybaeck J. Garbers C. Garbers Jak-Stat Signaling Induced by Interleukin-6 Family Cytokines in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cancers 2019 11 1704 10.3390/cancers11111704 31683891 PMC6896168

92. Wan S. Zhao E. Kryczek I. Vatan L. Sadovskaya A. Ludema G. Simeone D.M. Zou W. Welling T.H. Tumor-Associated Macrophages Produce Interleukin 6 and Signal via STAT3 to Promote Expansion of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stem Cells Gastroenterology 2014 147 1393 1404 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.039 25181692 PMC4253315

93. Zhou T. Zhou Y. Qian M. Fang Y. Ye S. Xin W. Yang X. Wu H. Interleukin-6 Induced by YAP in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Recruits Tumor-Associated Macrophages J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018 138 89 95 10.1016/j.jphs.2018.07.013 30340922

94. Chen R. Zhu S. Fan X. Wang H. Lotze M.T. Zeh H.J. Billiar T.R. Kang R. Tang D. High Mobility Group Protein B1 Controls Liver Cancer Initiation through Yes-associated Protein -dependent Aerobic Glycolysis Hepatology 2018 67 1823 1841 10.1002/hep.29663 29149457 PMC5906197

95. Perra A. Kowalik M.A. Ghiso E. Ledda-Columbano G.M. Di Tommaso L. Angioni M.M. Raschioni C. Testore E. Roncalli M. Giordano S. YAP Activation Is an Early Event and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Liver Cancer Development J. Hepatol. 2014 61 1088 1096 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.06.033 25010260

96. Plouffe S.W. Hong A.W. Guan K.-L. Disease Implications of the Hippo/YAP Pathway Trends Mol. Med. 2015 21 212 222 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.01.003 25702974 PMC4385444

97. Yu L.-X. Ling Y. Wang H.-Y. Role of Nonresolving Inflammation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development and Progression NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2018 2 6 10.1038/s41698-018-0048-z 29872724 PMC5871907

98. Villanueva A. Luedde T. The Transition from Inflammation to Cancer in the Liver Clin. Liver Dis. 2016 8 89 93 10.1002/cld.578 31041071 PMC6490202

99. Alqahtani A. Khan Z. Alloghbi A. Said Ahmed T.S. Ashraf M. Hammouda D.M. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Therapies Medicina 2019 55 526 10.3390/medicina55090526 31450841 PMC6780754

100. Pusterla T. Nèmeth J. Stein I. Wiechert L. Knigin D. Marhenke S. Longerich T. Kumar V. Arnold B. Vogel A. Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts (RAGE) Is a Key Regulator of Oval Cell Activation and Inflammation-Associated Liver Carcinogenesis in Mice Hepatology 2013 58 363 373 10.1002/hep.26395 23504974

101. Lluch P. Segarra G. Tosca J. Navarro L. Navarrete-Navarro J. Herrera G. Sanahuja A. Hernandez S. Lluch S. Medina P. Oxidative and Nitrosative Pattern in Circulating Leukocytes of Very Early/Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Anticancer. Res. 2020 40 6853 6861 10.21873/anticanres.14707 33288577

102. Xu M. Zhao Z. Song J. Lan X. Lu S. Chen M. Wang Z. Chen W. Fan X. Wu F. Interactions between Interleukin-6 and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Drive the Chemoresistant Phenotype of Hepatocellular Cancer Exp. Cell Res. 2017 351 142 149 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.01.008 28109867

103. Fisher D.T. Appenheimer M.M. Evans S.S. The Two Faces of IL-6 in the Tumor Microenvironment Semin. Immunol. 2014 26 38 47 10.1016/j.smim.2014.01.008 24602448 PMC3970580

104. Ayroldi E. Zollo O. Cannarile L. D’ Adamio F. Grohmann U. Delfino D.V. Riccardi C. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Prevents Activation-Induced Cell Death: IL-2–Independent Inhibition of Fas/FasL Expression and Cell Death Blood 1998 92 4212 4219 10.1182/blood.V92.11.4212 9834226

105. Hong C. Nam A.S. Keller H.R. Ligons D.L. Park J.-Y. Yoon H. Park J.J. Luckey M.A. Park J.-H. Interleukin-6 Expands Homeostatic Space for Peripheral T Cells Cytokine 2013 64 532 540 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.08.001 23988623 PMC3806195

106. Yeoh G.C.T. Ernst M. Rose-John S. Akhurst B. Payne C. Long S. Alexander W. Croker B. Grail D. Matthews V.B. Opposing Roles of Gp130-Mediated STAT-3 and ERK-1/2 Signaling in Liver Progenitor Cell Migration and Proliferation Hepatology 2007 45 486 494 10.1002/hep.21535 17256754

107. Al-Ghamdi T.H. Atta I.S. Efficacy of Interleukin-6 in the Induction of Liver Cell Proliferation after Hemi-Hepatectomy: Histopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2020 13 1540 1549 32782672 PMC7414478

108. Zhu Y. Qiu Z. Zhang Y. Li B. Jiang X. Partial Hepatectomy-induced Upregulation of SNHG12 Promotes Hepatocyte Proliferation and Liver Regeneration Mol. Med. Rep. 2019 21 1089 1096 10.3892/mmr.2019.10904 31894329 PMC7003022

109. Zhao Y. Ye W. Wang Y.-D. Chen W.-D. HGF/c-Met: A Key Promoter in Liver Regeneration Front. Pharmacol. 2022 13 808855 10.3389/fphar.2022.808855 35370682 PMC8968572

110. Fujiyoshi M. Ozaki M. Molecular Mechanisms of Liver Regeneration and Protection for Treatment of Liver Dysfunction and Diseases J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2011 18 13 22 10.1007/s00534-010-0304-2 20607568

111. Tsunematsu H. Tatsumi T. Kohga K. Yamamoto M. Aketa H. Miyagi T. Hosui A. Hiramatsu N. Kanto T. Hayashi N. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Enhances NK Sensitivity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Int. J. Cancer 2012 130 356 364 10.1002/ijc.26003 21351090

112. Kroemer G. Galluzzi L. Kepp O. Zitvogel L. Immunogenic Cell Death in Cancer Therapy Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2013 31 51 72 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-100008 23157435

113. Zitvogel L. Galluzzi L. Smyth M.J. Kroemer G. Mechanism of Action of Conventional and Targeted Anticancer Therapies: Reinstating Immunosurveillance Immunity 2013 39 74 88 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.014 23890065

114. Lin G. Wang J. Lao X. Wang J. Li L. Li S. Zhang J. Dong Y. Chang A.E. Li Q. Interleukin-6 Inhibits Regulatory T Cells and Improves the Proliferation and Cytotoxic Activity of Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells J. Immunother. 2012 35 337 343 10.1097/CJI.0b013e318255ada3 22495391

115. Erinjeri J.P. Thomas C.T. Samoilia A. Fleisher M. Gonen M. Sofocleous C.T. Thornton R.H. Siegelbaum R.H. Covey A.M. Brody L.A. Image-Guided Thermal Ablation of Tumors Increases the Plasma Level of Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-10 J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2013 24 1105 1112 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.015 23582441 PMC4167629

116. Zhao J. Li Q. Muktiali M. Ren B. Hu Y. Li D. Li Z. Li D. Xie Y. Tao M. Effect of Microwave Ablation Treatment of Hepatic Malignancies on Serum Cytokine Levels BMC Cancer 2020 20 812 10.1186/s12885-020-07326-x 32847533 PMC7448515

117. Wong V.W.-S. Yu J. Cheng A.S.-L. Wong G.L.-H. Chan H.-Y. Chu E.S.-H. Ng E.K.-O. Chan F.K.-L. Sung J.J.-Y. Chan H.L.-Y. High Serum Interleukin-6 Level Predicts Future Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Int. J. Cancer 2009 124 2766 2770 10.1002/ijc.24281 19267406

118. Li Y. Chen G. Han Z. Cheng H. Qiao L. Li Y. IL-6/STAT3 Signaling Contributes to Sorafenib Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Through Targeting Cancer Stem Cells Onco Targets Ther. 2020 13 9721 9730 10.2147/OTT.S262089 33061451 PMC7533247

119. Finn R.S. Qin S. Ikeda M. Galle P.R. Ducreux M. Kim T.-Y. Kudo M. Breder V. Merle P. Kaseb A.O. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 382 1894 1905 10.1056/NEJMoa1915745 32402160

120. Yang H. Kang B. Ha Y. Lee S.H. Kim I. Kim H. Lee W.S. Kim G. Jung S. Rha S.Y. High Serum IL-6 Correlates with Reduced Clinical Benefit of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma JHEP Rep. 2023 5 100672 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100672 36866388 PMC9972403

121. Myojin Y. Kodama T. Sakamori R. Maesaka K. Matsumae T. Sawai Y. Imai Y. Ohkawa K. Miyazaki M. Tanaka S. Interleukin-6 Is a Circulating Prognostic Biomarker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Combined Immunotherapy Cancers 2022 14 883 10.3390/cancers14040883 35205631 PMC8870238

122. Johnson D.E. O’Keefe R.A. Grandis J.R. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 Signalling Axis in Cancer Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018 15 234 248 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.8 29405201 PMC5858971

123. Abou-Alfa G.K. Meyer T. Cheng A.-L. El-Khoueiry A.B. Rimassa L. Ryoo B.-Y. Cicin I. Merle P. Chen Y. Park J.-W. Cabozantinib in Patients with Advanced and Progressing Hepatocellular Carcinoma N. Engl. J. Med. 2018 379 54 63 10.1056/NEJMoa1717002 29972759 PMC7523244

124. Kang Y. Cai Y. Yang Y. The Gut Microbiome and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implications for Early Diagnostic Biomarkers and Novel Therapies Liver Cancer 2022 11 113 125 10.1159/000521358 35634424 PMC9109080

125. Tripathi A. Debelius J. Brenner D.A. Karin M. Loomba R. Schnabl B. Knight R. The Gut–Liver Axis and the Intersection with the Microbiome Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018 15 397 411 10.1038/s41575-018-0011-z 29748586 PMC6319369

126. Luo W. Guo S. Zhou Y. Zhao J. Wang M. Sang L. Chang B. Wang B. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How the Gut Microbiota Contributes to Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy Front. Microbiol. 2022 13 873160 10.3389/fmicb.2022.873160 35572649 PMC9092458

127. Xiao Y.-T. Yan W.-H. Cao Y. Yan J.-K. Cai W. Neutralization of IL-6 and TNF-α Ameliorates Intestinal Permeability in DSS-Induced Colitis Cytokine 2016 83 189 192 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.04.012 27155817

128. Tang Y. Kitisin K. Jogunoori W. Li C. Deng C.-X. Mueller S.C. Ressom H.W. Rashid A. He A.R. Mendelson J.S. Progenitor/Stem Cells Give Rise to Liver Cancer Due to Aberrant TGF-β and IL-6 Signaling Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008 105 2445 2450 10.1073/pnas.0705395105 18263735 PMC2268156

129. Kitisin K. Tang Y. Katuri V. Volpe E.A. Mendelson J. Jogunoori W. Shetty K. Evans S. Mishra B. Mishra L. Hepatocellular Cancer Loses Tgf-Beta Signaling Progenitor/Stem Cell Niche, and Is Suppressed by Crosstalk between TGF-Beta and IL-6 Signaling Pathways J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2007 205 S87 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.217

130. Li W. Zhou X. Huang Z. Zhang H. Zhang L. Shang C. Chen Y. Laparoscopic Surgery Minimizes the Release of Circulating Tumor Cells Compared to Open Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surg. Endosc. 2015 29 3146 3153 10.1007/s00464-014-4041-5 25539696

131. Zhang M. Zhang S. Yang Z. Hu J. Hu W. Sun P. Wu L. Han B. Association between the Expression Levels of IL-6 and IL-6R in the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Microenvironment and Postoperative Recurrence Oncol. Lett. 2018 16 7158 7165 10.3892/ol.2018.9557 30546452 PMC6256737

132. Xiong S. Wang R. Chen Q. Luo J. Wang J. Zhao Z. Li Y. Wang Y. Wang X. Cheng B. Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Promote Stem Cell-like Properties of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells through IL-6/STAT3/Notch Signaling Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018 8 302 316 29511600 PMC5835697

133. Winton D.J. MiR-34a Sets the “Sweet Spot” for Notch in Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells Cell Stem Cell 2013 12 499 501 10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.018 23642356

134. Takebe N. Harris P.J. Warren R.Q. Ivy S.P. Targeting Cancer Stem Cells by Inhibiting Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog Pathways Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2011 8 97 106 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.196 21151206

135. Jang H.-J. Lim H.-J. Park E.-J. Lee S.-J. Lee S. Lee S.W. Rho M.-C. STAT3-Inhibitory Activity of Sesquiterpenoids and Diterpenoids from Curcuma Phaeocaulis Bioorg Chem. 2019 93 103267 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103267 31586702

136. DU Q. HU B. AN H.-M. SHEN K.-P. XU L. DENG S. WEI M.-M. Synergistic Anticancer Effects of Curcumin and Resveratrol in Hepa1-6 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Oncol. Rep. 2013 29 1851 1858 10.3892/or.2013.2310 23446753

137. Cui H. Li T. Guo H. Wang J. Xue P. Zhang Y. Fan J. Li Z. Gao Y. Silymarin-mediated Regulation of the Cell Cycle and DNA Damage Response Exerts Antitumor Activity in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Oncol. Lett. 2017 15 885 892 10.3892/ol.2017.7425 29399153 PMC5772825

138. Coward J. Kulbe H. Chakravarty P. Leader D. Vassileva V. Leinster D.A. Thompson R. Schioppa T. Nemeth J. Vermeulen J. Interleukin-6 as a Therapeutic Target in Human Ovarian Cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2011 17 6083 6096 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0945 21795409 PMC3182554

139. Rossi J.F. Négrier S. James N.D. Kocak I. Hawkins R. Davis H. Prabhakar U. Qin X. Mulders P. Berns B. A Phase I/II Study of Siltuximab (CNTO 328), an Anti-Interleukin-6 Monoclonal Antibody, in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Br. J. Cancer 2010 103 1154 1162 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605872 20808314 PMC2967052

140. Kurzrock R. Voorhees P.M. Casper C. Furman R.R. Fayad L. Lonial S. Borghaei H. Jagannath S. Sokol L. Usmani S.Z. A Phase I, Open-Label Study of Siltuximab, an Anti–IL-6 Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, or Castleman Disease Clin. Cancer Res. 2013 19 3659 3670 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3349 23659971

141. Karkera J. Steiner H. Li W. Skradski V. Moser P.L. Riethdorf S. Reddy M. Puchalski T. Safer K. Prabhakar U. The Anti-Interleukin-6 Antibody Siltuximab down-Regulates Genes Implicated in Tumorigenesis in Prostate Cancer Patients from a Phase I Study Prostate 2011 71 1455 1465 10.1002/pros.21362 21321981

142. Bayliss T.J. Smith J.T. Schuster M. Dragnev K.H. Rigas J.R. A Humanized Anti-IL-6 Antibody (ALD518) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 2011 11 1663 1668 10.1517/14712598.2011.627850 21995322

143. Shinriki S. Jono H. Ota K. Ueda M. Kudo M. Ota T. Oike Y. Endo M. Ibusuki M. Hiraki A. Humanized Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Antibody Suppresses Tumor Angiogenesis and In Vivo Growth of Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res. 2009 15 5426 5434 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0287 19706815

144. Ando K. Takahashi F. Motojima S. Nakashima K. Kaneko N. Hoshi K. Takahashi K. Possible Role for Tocilizumab, an Anti–Interleukin-6 Receptor Antibody, in Treating Cancer Cachexia J. Clin. Oncol. 2013 31 e69 e72 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2020 23129740

145. Finn R.S. Bentley G. Britten C.D. Amado R. Busuttil R.W. Targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with the Monoclonal Antibody Bevacizumab Inhibits Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Growing in an Orthotopic Mouse Model Liver Int. 2009 29 284 290 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01762.x 18482274

146. Boige V. Malka D. Bourredjem A. Dromain C. Baey C. Jacques N. Pignon J.-P. Vimond N. Bouvet-Forteau N. De Baere T. Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarkers of Single-Agent Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Oncologist 2012 17 1063 1072 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0465 22707516 PMC3425524

147. Hong J. Wang H. Shen G. Lin D. Lin Y. Ye N. Guo Y. Li Q. Ye N. Deng C. Recombinant Soluble Gp130 Protein Reduces DEN-Induced Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mice Sci. Rep. 2016 6 24397 10.1038/srep24397 27080032 PMC4832142

148. Yao X. Huang J. Zhong H. Shen N. Faggioni R. Fung M. Yao Y. Targeting Interleukin-6 in Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases and Cancers Pharmacol. Ther. 2014 141 125 139 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.09.004 24076269

149. Ara T. DeClerck Y.A. Interleukin-6 in Bone Metastasis and Cancer Progression Eur. J. Cancer 2010 46 1223 1231 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.026 20335016 PMC2917917

150. Quintás-Cardama A. Manshouri T. Estrov Z. Harris D. Zhang Y. Gaikwad A. Kantarjian H.M. Verstovsek S. Preclinical Characterization of Atiprimod, a Novel JAK2 AND JAK3 Inhibitor Investig. New Drugs 2011 29 818 826 10.1007/s10637-010-9429-z 20372971 PMC4170651

151. Choudhari S.R. Khan M.A. Harris G. Picker D. Jacob G.S. Block T. Shailubhai K. Deactivation of Akt and STAT3 Signaling Promotes Apoptosis, Inhibits Proliferation, and Enhances the Sensitivity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells to an Anticancer Agent, Atiprimod Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007 6 112 121 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0561 17237271

152. Gajos-Michniewicz A. Czyz M. WNT/β-Catenin Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Aberrant Activation, Pathogenic Roles, and Therapeutic Opportunities Genes. Dis. 2024 11 727 746 10.1016/j.gendis.2023.02.050 37692481 PMC10491942

153. Mohan C.D. Bharathkumar H. Bulusu K.C. Pandey V. Rangappa S. Fuchs J.E. Shanmugam M.K. Dai X. Li F. Deivasigamani A. Development of a Novel Azaspirane That Targets the Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma In Vitro and In Vivo J. Biol. Chem. 2014 289 34296 34307 10.1074/jbc.M114.601104 25320076 PMC4256360

154. Mascarenhas J. Hoffman R. Ruxolitinib: The First FDA Approved Therapy for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis Clin. Cancer Res. 2012 18 3008 3014 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3145 22474318

155. Wilson G.S. Tian A. Hebbard L. Duan W. George J. Li X. Qiao L. Tumoricidal Effects of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) on Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Vitro Cancer Lett. 2013 341 224 230 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.08.009 23941832

156. Guo H. Liang S. Wang Y. Zhou S. Yin D. Zhang S. Wang J. Wu D. Ma K. Liu Y. Cytochrome B5 Type A Alleviates HCC Metastasis via Regulating STOML2 Related Autophagy and Promoting Sensitivity to Ruxolitinib Cell Death Dis. 2022 13 623 10.1038/s41419-022-05053-8 35851063 PMC9293983

157. Yang S. Luo C. Gu Q. Xu Q. Wang G. Sun H. Qian Z. Tan Y. Qin Y. Shen Y. Activating JAK1 Mutation May Predict the Sensitivity of JAK-STAT Inhibition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Oncotarget 2016 7 5461 5469 10.18632/oncotarget.6684 26701727 PMC4868698

158. Song Z. Liu X. Zhang W. Luo Y. Xiao H. Liu Y. Dai G. Hong J. Li A. Ruxolitinib Suppresses Liver Fibrosis Progression and Accelerates Fibrosis Reversal via Selectively Targeting Janus Kinase 1/2 J. Transl. Med. 2022 20 157 10.1186/s12967-022-03366-y 35382859 PMC8981941